Good day, and welcome to this Ultralife Corporation's Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Release Conference Call. At this time, for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to Ms. Jody Burfening. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Catherine, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us this morning for Ultralife Corporation's earnings conference call for the third quarter of fiscal 2021. With us on today's call are Mike Popielec, Ultralife's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Phil Fain, Ultralife's Chief Financial Officer. The earnings press release was issued earlier this morning. If anyone has not yet received a copy, I invite you to visit the Company's website, www.ultralifecorp.com, where you'll find the release under Investor News in the Investor Relations section. Before turning the call over to management, I would like to remind everyone that some statements made during this conference call contain forward-looking statements based on current expectations. Actual results could differ materially from those projected as a result of various risks and uncertainties. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially include the impact of COVID-19, potential reductions in revenue from key customers, acceptance of our new products on a global basis, and uncertain global economic conditions. The Company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect the Company's analysis only as of today's date. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking information to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. Further information on these factors and other factors that could affect Ultralife's financial results is included in Ultralife's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the latest annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, on today's call, management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that management considers to be useful metrics that differ from GAAP. These non-GAAP measures should be considered as supplemental to corresponding GAAP figures. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Mike. Good morning, Mike.

Good morning, Jody, and thank you, everyone, for joining the call. Today, I'll start by making some brief overall comments about our Q3 2021 operating performance, after which I'll turn the call over to Phil, who will take you through the detailed financial results. When Phil is finished, I'll provide an update on the progress against our 2021 revenue initiatives, then open it up for questions. For the third quarter of 2021, COVID supply chain challenges negatively impacted our customers, as well as our own product manufacturing schedules, affecting quarterly shipments, revenue, and earnings. We estimate the COVID supply chain issues for the third quarter of 2021 to have had an adverse impact on revenue of approximately $4.1 million, operating profit of $1.3 million, and EPS of $0.06. As such, total company revenue was down 11% or $2.6 million year-over-year, which drove a slight operating loss and negative earnings per share. Revenues in our core end markets, government, defense, and medical, were both down year-over-year. However, we continued to see improvement in our oil and gas and China revenues, up 90% and 86%, respectively, year-over-year, which drove our total company commercial revenues up 5%. Coincident with the COVID supply chain-related revenue impact, customer demand remained high, and our ending Q3 total company firm order backlog increased by 22% or $7.7 million over the end of Q2, not including the $4.2 million Leader Radio add-on contract received and announced just a few days ago. To address these supply chain challenges, we have leveraged our established relationships with our suppliers and customers, working side-by-side to acquire and qualify required materials, managing freight and logistical costs as best as possible, transparently adjusting delivery expectations, tightening overhead spending, and in many cases, raising prices. Though difficult, we do not view the current COVID supply chain challenges as permanent. And while closely monitoring cost and worldwide supply chain developments, given our solid liquidity position, we will continue to aggressively pursue completion of our transformational projects and support new contracts to realize the expected new revenue growth streams they will bring, despite the near-term pressure on profitability and year-over-year comparisons. In a few minutes, I'll give you a further update on our revenue initiatives. But first, I would like to ask Ultralife's CFO, Phil Fain, to take you through additional details of the Q3 2021 financial performance. Phil?

Thank you, Mike, and good morning, everyone. Earlier this morning, we released our third quarter results for the quarter ended September 30, 2021. We also filed our Form 10-Q with the SEC and have updated our investor presentation, which you can find in the Investor Relations section of our website. I would like to thank all those that helped make this happen. Consolidated revenues for the 2021 third quarter totaled $21.8 million compared to $24.4 million reported for the third quarter of 2020, a decrease of 10.7%. Commercial sales increased 5.1%, reflecting a rebound in oil and gas and international industrial markets, partially offset by a reduction in medical sales from the initial surge of batteries for ventilators, respirators, and infusion pumps in response to COVID-19 last year. Government defense sales declined 39.7% relative to the shipment of an order for 5390 batteries in last year's period and lower shipments for our Communications Systems business. As Mike mentioned, for the 2021 third quarter, increased lead times on components from suppliers and other COVID-19 related logistics matters significantly impacted both our internal and our customers' manufacturing schedules, resulting in delays in our shipments to future periods. Of the $4.1 million adverse revenue impact, $2.5 million was related to our government defense business, with the remaining $1.6 million related to our commercial business. On a segment basis, Battery & Energy Products accounted for $2.5 million of the $4.1 million revenue impact and communication systems for $1.6 million. Revenues from our Battery & Energy Products segment were $20 million compared to $21.8 million last year, a decrease of 8.3%, attributable to a $2.9 million or 28.3% decrease in medical sales, and a $2.6 million or 43.3% decrease in government defense, partially offset by a $2 million or 89.5% increase in oil and gas market sales and a 1.2 or 86.2% increase in sales from our China operations, primarily driven by our new ER and thin cell products. The decline in government defense sales resulted from a large shipment in last year's third quarter of a 5390 battery order placed in December 2019 by the U.S. Department of Defense and delayed sales to a large global defense product. The sales split between commercial and government defense for our battery business was 83-17 compared to 72-28 for the 2020 third quarter, and the domestic to international split was 40-60 compared to 50-50 last year, accentuating both the delays in U.S. government defense sales and the combined success of our global revenue diversification strategy. Revenues from our Communications Systems segment were $1.8 million compared to $2.5 million last year, a decrease of 31.1% and reflecting shipments delayed to future periods due to increased lead times on components from suppliers and other COVID-19 related logistics matters. On a consolidated basis, the commercial to government defense sales split was 76-24 versus 65-35 for the year-earlier quarter. Our consolidated gross profit was $5.1 million compared to $6.5 million for the 2020 period. As a percentage of total revenues, consolidated gross margin was 23.5% versus 26.7% for last year's third quarter. Gross profit for our Battery & Energy Products business was $4.8 million compared to $5.7 million last year. Gross margin was 24.0%, a decrease of 200 basis points from 26% reported last year, reflecting sales product mix and lower factory volume. For our Communications Systems segment, gross profit was $0.3 million compared to $0.8 million for the year-earlier period. Gross margin of 18.0% compared to 32.8% last year, reflecting lower factory throughput in the 2021 period. Operating expenses were $5.9 million compared to $5.8 million last year, reflecting investment in engineering resources for new product development, including resources dedicated to the conformal wearable battery IDIQ contract announced on May 17. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses were 27.1% compared to 23.8% for last year's third quarter. Operating loss for the third quarter of 2021 was $0.8 million compared to income of $0.7 million for the 2020 quarter, reflecting lower sales and gross margins, resulting from supply chain delays and our continued investments in new product development. Adjusted EBITDA, defined as EBITDA including noncash stock-based compensation expense, was $0.3 million or 1.3% of sales compared to $1.7 million or 6.8% for the third quarter of 2020. On a trailing 12-month basis, adjusted EBITDA was $8.3 million or 8.0% of sales. Our tax benefit for the third quarter was $0.2 million compared to a provision of $0.2 million for the 2020 quarter computed at statutory rates for GAAP reporting purposes. Accordingly, our reported tax benefit for the third quarter is based on an effective rate of 22.4%, which is reduced to 5.5% when we pay our taxes. Using the 22.4% statutory tax rate, net loss was $0.6 million or $0.04 per share on a diluted basis for the 2021 third quarter. This compares to net income of $0.4 million or $0.03 per share on a diluted basis for the 2020 quarter. We utilized adjusted EPS to reflect actual cash taxes paid or to be paid and define adjusted EPS as EPS excluding the provision for noncash U.S. taxes expected to be fully offset by our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits. As noted in the supplementary table in our earnings release, adjusted EPS on a diluted basis was a loss of $0.05 per share for the 2021 third quarter compared to a positive $0.04 for the 2020 third quarter. Ultralife maintained its solid balance sheet and liquidity in the third quarter, with cash on hand slightly increasing from $15.8 to $15.9 million and debt decreasing from $0.7 million to $0.3 million from the second quarter. We ended the 2021 third quarter with working capital of $47.9 million and a current ratio of 3.9 compared to $45.8 million and 3.4 for year-end 2020. As a result, we remain well positioned to fund organic growth initiatives, including new product development and strategic capital expenditures while expediting our organic growth through accretive M&A. Going forward, with our growing backlog, ample liquidity, diversified end markets, and growth initiatives, we remain steadfastly focused on realizing the full leverage potential of our business model. I will now turn it back to Mike.

Thank you, Phil. For 2021, we continue to focus on driving revenue growth by market and sales reach expansion, primarily through diversification, new product development, and strategic CapEx for competitive advantage and a disciplined approach to accretive acquisitions. For the Battery & Energy products business, the strategy for market and sales reach expansion is about diversifying more into the global commercial markets and international government defense markets to lessen our historical concentration in the U.S. and government defense market. For Q3 2021, overall global B&E medical revenue represented 37% of total Battery & Energy products revenue. Demand from current customers was for applications such as ventilators, respirators, infusion pumps, digital X-rays, and surgical robots. We also received over $4.3 million in delivery orders from existing medical customer blanket and/or multiyear agreements. A new emerging medical device application that we are very excited about is in the area of wearable thin cell batteries, such as those used to power devices for vital signs monitoring. For a product line for which we were just shipping testing samples in 2019 and 2020, in Q3, we received initial production orders for shipments in Q4, and we are now ramping up production to serve demand, which is expected to grow significantly over multiple customers in the 2022-2023 time frame. Q3 oil and gas and subsea electrification commercial revenue was approximately 21% of total B&E sales. As mentioned earlier, we continue to see encouraging signs of improvement in our core oil and gas business, which drove up total Q3 oil and gas revenues at a strong double-digit rate year-over-year. In Q3, B&E's U.S. government business represented approximately 15% of total B&E product sales, with shipments primarily for radio batteries and chargers to OEM primes. Revenue is down year-over-year, as stated earlier, due to OEM COVID supply chain shipment delays and the nonrecurrence of prior year DLA 5390 shipments as the main drivers. The first article testing for the next-generation BA-5390 primary battery is now fully approved and signed off, and we do have a small delivery order to supply under this current IDIQ with shipments expected in the first half of 2022. We are also now eligible for additional delivery orders under this IDIQ, subject to the discretion of the DoD. Though there are no guarantees of future delivery orders for government IDIQ contracts, the historical revenue over the last decade in any given year has ranged from hundreds of thousands of dollars to up to several millions of dollars. Regarding the wearable conformal battery IDIQ contract, which we announced on May 17 and supports the U.S. Army's new integrated visual augmentation system, we are currently executing the development sourcing phase of the process while navigating through the supply chain challenges to best meet an ambitious first article testing schedule. As the Army recently announced, the overarching IVIS program was delayed by up to one year due to technical challenges in the IVIS heads-up digital display. Despite this, we continue to aggressively work towards the key first article testing completion milestone for the associated conformal wearable battery. This is now more likely to occur in the latter part of 2022 with potential production awards thereafter. The actual timing of deliveries and quantities are at the discretion of the U.S. Army and include successful completion of first article testing, demonstrating full compliance with the contractual product specifications and program requirements. As new product development remains a core element of our organic growth strategy. In addition to the next-generation 5390 and conformal wearable batteries, during the quarter, we continued to advance several of our multiyear development new products, including, but not limited to, next-generation hot swappable medical batteries, new smart U1 batteries, new 5790 and XR123A CFx blend primary batteries, OEM public safety radio batteries, and next-generation ruggedized modular large-format energy storage batteries. It is worth noting that with some easing of the COVID restrictions, we have begun to once again attend public industry events, and we were delighted to introduce our new hot swappable medical card battery at the August 2021 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Trade Show in Las Vegas. The showcase resulted in several specific customers requesting products for formal technical evaluations later this year, with production deliveries beginning as early as the first half of next year. We are also very proud of the fact that this product was conceived, designed, sourced, and manufactured over multiple Ultralife locations, leveraging our worldwide technical talent and delivering a product suitable for a global customer base. As access to our key customers opens up post-COVID, we are seeing a return to more opportunities for new product development and collaboration across all of our locations. New product development in multigenerational product planning continues to keep us current with market needs and gives us the opportunity to remain close with and provide value to our key customers. Regarding the efforts to strengthen our competitive differentiation, we also continue to invest in strategic CapEx. The new manufacturing line at our New York, New York facility for our new high-performance lithium manganese dioxide 3-volt cell is now fulfilling initial customer orders. Voice-of-the-customer feedback is showing positive responses for our products' performance, safety, contribution to the overall devices competitiveness, as well as its U.S. manufacturing location. Performance differentiation has been demonstrated in a high rate or power capability, which is particularly useful in illumination devices and medical devices with short, high pulse rate applications. In China, the performance attributes expected from the completion of the first phase of our project to upgrade our thionyl chloride ER cell continue to be confirmed by customer testing. For this product line, which can be in operation anywhere from 5 to 10 to 20 years, customers have long testing and qualification periods. So their feedback provides valuable validation of our products and leads to sticky customer relationships. As you may recall, this overall project involves several steps of product and process improvements, which will help us multiply severalfold, our total available market with newly identified thionyl chloride ER cell commercial and industrial applications. Medical and other industrial customers also continue to tap into our China operations for the supply of battery pack solutions, not just ourselves, which is growing our value proposition. In Q3, our total China operations revenue was up 86% year-over-year, an indicator of growing global demand for our China capabilities. Our goal remains to produce the highest value proposition, best quality, and safest products, in which every one of our global locations best serves the supply chain of the particular end market and/or OEM customer. Looking at our Communication Systems business, Q3 new product development revenue from products less than or equal to three years old represented approximately 51% of communication systems revenues. Regarding the U.S. Army's Handheld, Manpack, and Small Form Fit and Leader Radio programs, we just received and announced a follow-on order for $4.2 million with delivery starting in Q2 2022. As the Army is moving into full production, we expect potentially another round of awards for the Leader Radio program in the first half of 2022. As radios are the critical enabler of the Communication Systems business, the team is continually focused on technology innovations, market trends, and customer requirements to position us for future business, supporting both Handheld and Manpack radios and integrated systems. The effects of COVID-19 continued to impact the Communication Systems business. Supply chain issues are affecting electronic component availability, resulting in extended material lead times and manufacturing timelines, clouding revenue forecasts. For supply chain components that are available, the shortage of global transport resources is causing delayed deliveries, often compounded with increased transportation and logistics costs. Our teams continue to work closely with customers and suppliers to actively manage sales and operations planning to mitigate the supply chain and manufacturing impact to the extent possible. Communication systems also continue working to expand into the commercial market with multiple system integration product initiatives for several key customers for the mobile data card, which will enable analysis of autonomous vehicle data during testing and manufacturing of the vehicles. Initial purchases of low rate production quantities for tests and evaluations have been received and will be delivered in Q4. We are pleased to have reached this milestone and are working steadily with the customer to position for a successful test and evaluation with production orders to follow. This product is the first purely commercial product offering for Communication Systems and a significant milestone for the Communications Systems team. Separately, Communication Systems has also continued the prototype phase for a virtualized radio access network enclosure, supporting 5G network deployments worldwide. This is the second, all commercial business opportunity. We have experienced delays in material acquisition for finalizing prototypes, but anticipate completion soon with delivery to customer for test and evaluation in Q4 with production volume orders to initiate in early 2022. The award of additional HMS, Manpack, Handheld amplifier systems ongoing dialogue with other government defense OEMs, initial order in a commercial business program with a second quickly to follow, are all opportunities for increased revenue, which will assist in mitigating the often inconsistent or lumpy defense sales to which communication systems have been traditionally dependent. The diversification in commercial products, combined with our participation in ongoing military radar programs anchors our optimism about the long-term growth of the Communications Systems business. In closing, for the third quarter of 2021, though our financial results were challenged on several fronts, we were pleased with our overall total company commercial growth, progress on transformational projects, addition of new orders to our backlog, and positive operational cash flow. We are also glad to now have the next Leader Radio follow-on award in hand. Most importantly, I want to thank each and every one of our employees, channel partners, and customers for their tremendous effort and cooperation in fulfillment execution given the present extraordinary supply chain hurdles. Our top priority remains to achieve revenue realization from our transformational projects, delivering new meaningful, sustainable annual revenue streams in attractive growth markets from new competitively differentiated products. For Communication Systems, that includes our additional potential Leader Radio follow-on awards, new OEM Manpack radios and ancillaries, next-generation 20-watt amplifiers, and integrated computing, 5G, and AI solutions. At B&E, included are the new 3 Volt product line, the new ER product line, the smart U1 battery product line, the wearable conformal battery, the 5790 and XR123A CFx-blend primary batteries; and several new public safety, ThinCell, medical, and subsea electrification battery packs. We are also monitoring several potential new U.S. government budget and infrastructure package opportunities for each of our business units, should that legislation pass through Congress. As we approach the end of 2021, we will continue to optimize our financial performance, targeting total year profitability, solid cash flow from operations, and maintaining our strong balance sheet while supporting transformational products and investments. Though we expect the current COVID supply chain challenges to potentially continue at least a few more quarters, it is imperative that we stay keenly focused on completing our current multiyear transformational projects in order to unleash the new revenue streams each will bring. We continue to focus our time and effort on completing these transformational projects as we believe they are the elements which are most under our control to improve our organic revenue growth rate and revenue and EPS consistency. We will also continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities where we can quickly gain scale and achieve further operating leverage. Operator, this concludes my prepared remarks, and we'll be happy to open up the call for questions.

I will take the first question from Gary Siperstein at Eliot Rose Wealth Management.

Mike, on the COVID and supply chain, you mentioned you put through some price increases. Do you feel that will offset most of the added expenses? I know it's not going to necessarily change any delays. But do you think that will help with half the expense increases or a quarter of the expense increases?

I think generally, yes. I mean, I think we've been working extremely close with our customers. I mean, in some cases, our customers are stepping right up to help us with some of the premiums that we've been subjected to in freight and the like, some of our contracts are existing contracts, and so you have to go in after the fact and make some changes. But for the most part, as I indicated in my prepared remarks, our customers are right there side-by-side and helping us try and address some of these cost increases and some of these delays. So from a standpoint, purely of the cost increases, I think we are doing a pretty good job of managing those down. But as you indicated, it's the delays that are having a bigger impact at this point.

Okay. And did those price increases go through later in the third quarter, so we'll have a full quarter effect in Q4? Or did they just go through recently? So it will be more of a Q1 part of the quarter and more of a Q1 opportunity.

Gary, they went through earlier in Q3.

Okay. And in terms of the Leader Radio, I saw one of the prime contractors recently got a $200 million contract, and they said they went into full-rate production. And in the news release, it said the ceiling on that contract over the next 10 years is $16 billion, and they talked about 100,000 Leader Radios and 65,000 Manpack radios, and that was just one of the contractors. And then the other contractor, I guess, for the amplifiers is where you just got that $4.2 million contract. So my first question is, does the government give out equal contracts to both prime contractors? Or is it different? Did the amplifier customer also get a $200 million contract as they went into full rate production? Or is it hard to know who gets what?

Yes, it's really hard to know what goes into the final details of each of those individual contracts. I mean, we read the news headlines as well. Sometimes they split, and sometimes they allocate bigger portions to one versus the other, at least from our own experiences; sometimes they just give a single award. So what we try to do is not try to figure out too much what's going into our OEM partners' contracts. But really, just whenever we're called upon by the OEM partners, we do our very best job to help make them as competitive as possible so we can get the biggest share possible for us.

Okay. And trying to come out with a potential figure for Ultralife. $16 billion over 10 years is $1.6 billion a year for that one contractor. So even if you cut it by 50%, it's still almost $1 billion a year, $800 million or something like that for that one contractor. And I know you guys supply batteries and chargers to one and amplifiers to the other. So if indeed, it is worth $800 million annually to at least that one contractor on batteries and chargers, does that mean the opportunity for Ultralife is $5 million to $10 million a year? Or is it $10 million to $15 million a year? I'm just trying to get a sense for the battery and chargers if that contractor does continue to go into full production with the government?

Yes, Gary, I wish life was that easy that we could straight-line this across the years. But the 100,000 figure that you gave is accurate. That was issued three years ago. And just using math from the initial press release by the U.S. Army, it's 20% or 22% of all those Leader Radios have the VAA type of system with it. So that magnifies the opportunity, and you're correct, we supply batteries and our VAA systems. So, but then again, predicting the annual impact of Government & Defense contracts, the timing of those, and the magnitude of those is — I used to call it 4-dimensional chess. It's now 5-dimensional chess. Very difficult to do. So the opportunity is there on both the battery side and the VAA side.

Okay. Regarding the recently secured $4.2 million contract for amplifiers, Mike, you mentioned that shipping would begin in the second quarter of next year. Will it take two quarters to complete the shipping, or will everything be shipped within one quarter?

It really depends on the supply chain. The biggest challenge we face is securing firm commitments from our suppliers to construct the units for shipping. Since we just received this contract a few days ago, it is too early to predict exactly when everything will ship, but we believe shipping will begin in the second quarter of 2022.

Okay. And have there been any indications from that customer on follow-on orders after that point? Did they give you any color on what kind of orders the government is expecting from them and what, therefore, they expect from you, so you can improve the supply chain, have six months' notice, that kind of thing, nine months' notice?

We try to keep close to what we hear from our channel partners as well as what we read in various media. And it's just really too early to say. I mean, we believed, as was mentioned in my prepared remarks that the fact that it's going to full-rate production is a positive sign. But there's just a lot of variables, government budgeting, and various things going on in the world that make it impossible to predict right now what the next steps would be. But at this point, we're very pleased that they've gone to full-rate production because that potentially creates another opportunity for us.

Okay. Moving to the 3-volt product line. I think last quarter's conference call, you mentioned different discussions with customers. I think you said they were up to 20 potential customers and different applications. And you mentioned some of the customers are 6-figure orders, some are million-unit orders or even more. Can you give us any color on what's going on there?

Now, those continue, as I mentioned last quarter, and that's why I didn't cover it again this quarter, but we're continuing to work through the final tweaks on the products and making initial shipments and continue to work the customer funnel of new opportunities. And as I mentioned in the remarks, we're getting good feedback on some of the characteristics of the product bring to the marketplace. So we're very optimistic about its future.

Okay. And moving to the conformal. So you said that the schedule has changed a bit. So previously, you had talked about maybe getting into testing starting in the first quarter of next year and maybe shipments or orders in the second half. So now testing is delayed to the second half of next year. Is that correct?

Yes, yes. The overall program due to a part of the program that we're not involved with has been delayed, and they publicly announced up to a year. And so it sort of pushed the whole program out a little bit. So we're trying to still work as aggressively as possible. We're spending extra money to do it, frankly, to make sure that when the time comes that we're in a good position to pass the first article testing and hopefully be first in line with some of the deliveries that would follow that.

Okay. And as the government giving you any color on when they can start first article testing?

No, we have no new updates on our specific schedule.

Okay. In terms of the operating models of the Company, originally, it was, I think a 30, 10, 10, 5, equals 10, something like that. The Company has been challenged for a while now to get to the 30% gross margin. Can you talk to that model, if it's still effective and what it's going to take to get to it?

Yes. I think it's still very much effective. I think the overall principles hold. As I mentioned in the battery side of the business, as you could glean from some of the comments that Phil has made over the last couple of quarters is that with the number of new products going through the factory that are brand new. There's certainly some inefficiencies associated with that extra production of scrap and so on and so forth. And so that's taken a hit a little bit on our gross margins. It hasn't necessarily been anything related to price per se or the value proposition. It has more to do with just the development cycle and getting up to full volumes, going through some of the growing pains with some of the complex products that we make. In the case of communication systems, it's typically been a higher-margin type of activity and also, frankly, at a higher level of investment technically for capabilities. It's very susceptible to volume. And so in the last quarter, you saw that the volume was low, and that had an adverse effect on overall gross margins. So collectively, we know what's causing the gross margin challenges, we know that these are not permanent situations, but they are having an impact on gross margin. It hasn't been price though; I want to emphasize that. Mostly, it's just sort of going through the growing pains of new products getting through the factory to a very efficient production manufacturing.

Okay. So if the revenue levels start picking up and you have the right mix between the base business, battery business, and communication business. So as you get back to $25 million on a quarterly run rate and then move, hopefully, to $30 million, do you think that would get us to the 30%?

Directionally, it would be unclear.

Okay. But you still believe you can get to 30%?

Yes. Yes. I mean, there's no reason why we can't. Most of it has to do with our aspirations and simultaneously putting through a lot of new products all at the same time. In the short term, there's some impact, as we talked about earlier in the call about inflation from some of the supply chain issues we have. But again, those won't last forever. We don't know how long they last; they won't last forever. But fundamentally, we still believe that our business model that we put together is achievable.

If the pressures from COVID begin to lessen over the next six to nine months, along with the booster shot, the expected approval for children ages 5 to 11 for the new Merck medication, and potential success with antidepressants for individuals with COVID, we might see COVID rates peak and decrease during this period. Even if supply chain challenges persist, improvements in management and the government's efforts to keep ports and logistics operational around the clock could help. As these issues gradually improve or diminish, the backlog has already exceeded $7 million, not counting an additional $4.2 million contract, bringing the total backlog to over $11 million for the upcoming year. This suggests a strong likelihood that the third quarter might represent the lowest point, with a potential for gradual improvement in Q4. Moving into next year, we can expect new products to start transitioning from testing to production, possibly introducing one or two new products each quarter. Given this perspective, it appears that the future looks significantly more promising than what the stock price has reflected in the last two quarters, which have been difficult in terms of revenue and earnings. Therefore, perhaps it is time for the company to revisit its buyback program. I recall that previously when stock was bought back just under $5, the company was trading at one-time sales or more, with book value around $4.5 million. Currently, on an enterprise level, with a market cap minus cash, and with a revenue rebound anticipated next year, we are clearly below one-time sales and at a greater discount to book value than when stock was previously repurchased around the $4 range. The company currently has nearly $16 million in cash and a $35 million credit line, providing a total of $50 million in potential availability. Taking advantage of this optimistic outlook seems sensible, particularly as the stock price may continue to decline if investors react negatively to quarterly results, compounded by the timing of tax loss selling. Additionally, many who purchased shares at higher prices around $9, $10, or $11 during the conformal announcement may sell for tax reasons. Over the past year, there have also been insider purchases at prices higher than the current stock value, alongside option exercises without corresponding selling. Concerning capital allocation, while I am not advocating against pursuing mergers and acquisitions, as this remains part of the strategy, I am suggesting that alongside M&A efforts, it may be beneficial to consider the buyback of stock. Historically, the last two acquisitions were conducted at about one-time sales, while the current stock is available at less than one-time sales and below book value. Therefore, repurchasing shares seems like a favorable option as part of the capital allocation plan. Investing a portion of the available $50 million to buy back $5 million of stock before year-end during the tax selling period could align with our interests, especially if the third quarter is indeed the turning point, leading into a new year enriched with various transformative opportunities. It may take several quarters to return to $25 million to $30 million, but it seems achievable as some challenges ease and products transition to production. Could you discuss this possibility, Mike, and the potential to use some cash to capitalize on this situation?

Well, thank you very much for those comments and suggestions. I mean, when we look at our capital deployment, we do it on a regular basis, we look at a number of different things. And I would say, sort of in the top category is what can we do for organic growth, organic revenue of anything we can to put capital towards increasing the trajectory of our organic revenue growth. And that's going to have a very high priority. We talk about transformational products and also capabilities that are important to spend more time and effort, obviously, recent years on strategic CapEx. So that's another gross organic growth initiative that we deploy capital towards. Next, we look at acquisitions. I think we've made some good buys and acquisitions and have accretive acquisitions to show for it. We now are almost debt-free again. So now we continue, I think, to be good stewards of the cash that we are generating. And I think it gives us some flexibility, especially in difficult times like these. And then, of course, we have the opportunity to return to our shareholders in the form of stock buybacks. So those are all on the table at any given time. I'll discuss those internally. And I appreciate your suggestion about maybe the timing is good. We'll take that under advisement. But generally speaking, we look at those items I just mentioned on a regular basis. Our cash balance continues to grow. So we want to make sure we put it to good use to continue to drive the top and bottom line of the Company.

Okay. I would just add, you've done all that. You've invested in transformational products, you've invested in inorganic to position the Company, you've made acquisitions, you've absorbed the COVID problems, you've absorbed supply chain problems, and you've still been EBITDA positive that what could prove to be the low for the Company, and you've still increased your cash. So again, I'm not saying instead of inorganic opportunities, instead of transformational products, instead of CapEx, transformational CapEx, you've done all those things and still have gotten out of debt and cash keeps going up every quarter. So again, it seems to be an opportunity and presumably as the future unfolds and all these things go into production, whether it's the second half of 2022 or 2023, when you're hitting on all cylinders, there could be an opportunity where the stock is back to $8, $10, $12, who knows, and you always have an opportunity for a secondary. So to buy stock in the five or six range with tax selling and with the recent poor results, it just seems like you can have your cake and eat it too, that it wouldn't prohibit you from any of the investments you talked about, any of the priorities that come before that and also your ability to find and buy a good M&A deal. All right guys, good luck, thank you.

Thank you, Gary.

Thank you, Gary.

I'll now take the next question from Josh Sullivan of The Benchmark Company.

Just to your comment on predicting the 5-dimensional chess that is on spending. If we get a longer continuing resolution, how does that impact you? What percentage of your defense contributions over the next three quarters or so are defined by new program spending?

I think it's an excellent question, Josh. I mean, I'm an expert personally on costing resolutions, but when I understand — trying to understand as best as I can. I know that with the continuing resolution, I think roughly 80% of the budgets are in play and that existing projects continue to get funded, but it may have an impact on new projects. And at the same time, just from a behavioral perspective, because there's overall less money available, you see it sometimes impacting us on the day-to-day flow business, if you will, which impacts both of our business units. So going forward, we — under the understanding that some of the large programs that we're currently involved with would be captured under existing funds. But some of the brand-new programs that may be bidding or development with the customer may be potentially delayed. We're just probably on a long-term basis trying to understand what that impact will be, knowing that maybe from where we said we're not going to get it exactly right, but just to meet the understanding of the possibilities. But I think the bigger issue short-term is trying to make sure that whatever funding is available is still flowing through the sort of the core flow business respectively.

Right. Okay. And then any early reads into the '23 budget as it comes together, any comments out of the Pentagon on if you're seeing some support for various programs in there?

Yes. I mean, we have some that analyze what they can glean. And we think there's opportunities in both our businesses. So we're cautiously optimistic about that, and we're trying to make sure that we understand what potential things are available, so we can target either direct participation or participation, many times we would do through an OEM or another channel partner. So we're consciously optimistic about at least what it says on the surface. But we'll wait until things actually completed Congress signs off on them and comes to reality versus speculation.

And then just on the vaccine mandate. I mean, as the deadline comes up, do you see it impacting your labor availability or your customers' labor availability? I mean, do you consider yourself high-touch labor? Or just curious how you're thinking about that?

Even without the vaccine availability, I think labor is challenging. Whether it be from availability of labor or wage and benefit rate inflation, let alone what the vaccine mandates are. So to me, that's just another facet of an already challenging situation. What we're trying to do is be a good employer, trying to make sure that we don't whipsaw people in terms of headcount reductions and things like that, just because there's a quarter or two of profitability pressure. We want to make sure we're sending the right message, and we're taking care of our good employees, and we're trying to make it attractive for new employees to come and work for us, both from a wage perspective as well as from a benefit portfolio. So to me, the vaccine potential is just another facet of the existing situation.

Got it. Got it. And then you talked a little bit about diversifying the international defense sales. What are those opportunities?

Most of the time, we have relationships with other multinational companies in countries friendly to the United States. And so a lot of times when a technology matures in the U.S., there's an opportunity in one of our allies around the world for that technology or a derivative of it. So they're also long cycle. Some of the countries that we've been participating in, there are large countries that you would know the well names of — have gone through some of their own COVID shutdowns and lockdowns even more severe than we had during this time here. And so that's had an impact on us. But generally speaking, these are allied countries that have very positive relationships with our military. And as such, are involved in similar types of equipment or derivatives thereof. In the case of Comm Systems, certainly, there's a provider of ancillary equipment to radios; a lot of the modernization activities that are taking place in the U.S. are also taking place in their own right in a number of international companies. So we would be working with partners there as well to try to provide product in those modernization activities.

And then as far as passing prices on to customers, just be curious how you're balancing those conversations between what you might see as transitory costs versus structural inflation realities. How are you having those conversations with customers?

Well, I think we're very closely aligned with our customers. And I think that the customers themselves are dealing with the same pricing, cost pricing issues that we're dealing with. So I think there is — at first, they were relatively difficult, but as it progressed, I think that there was a much better understanding because we're pretty much in the same boat. And you started out by talking about passing on cost to the customers, and instead of hearing their defense against that, they come back to you with their own personal stories. So there is a general understanding of what is driving the price increases. And I don't want to say it's easy conversations. But then again, in many cases, it seems like it's expected. So initially difficult with some outliers, but I think our folks have done a really terrific job in based on the relationships, the deep relationships that we have with our customers.

And then just one on the oil and gas strength that you mentioned. What specific products are driving that? And then do you have inventory in that segment, just given that it's kind of on the rebound here that might allow you to capture this environment?

Yes. I think the main driver, Josh, is that if you look year-over-year, if you look at the U.S. right now, we closely follow-on a weekly basis, the U.S. rig count. So the U.S. rig count is 545 active rigs right now. You look at it a year ago; it's higher by 255 rigs. And I think more than anything, it's that rig count that's driving that and where we see the largest portion of the increase is purely downhole drilling. That is the downhole drilling itself is up over the 90% that we mentioned. And with not a lot of lead time within this industry, we have to have inventory available or access to available inventory. So that's why you'll see that our inventory is pushing $28 million, where under normal circumstances, we would want that to be below $26 million, trending towards $25 million. So we — again, those close relationships and just trying to anticipate what's going to happen next week is really what it's all about. But again, it's driven by the rig count in the U.S., which is the numbers I gave you in international as well, which is also up.

That concludes today's questions-and-answer session. I'd now like to turn the conference back to Mike for any closing or additional remarks.

Great. Thank you once again for joining us for our third quarter 2021 earnings call. We look forward to sharing with you our quarterly progress on each quarter's conference call in the future. As mentioned earlier, also like note, we update our investor presentation on our website. So please check that out. Everybody, have a great day. Thanks very much for participating. That concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.