Good morning and welcome to Agenis Inc.'s fourth quarter and year-end 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Currently, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal remarks. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Zach Orman, Head of Investor Relations.

Thank you, Regina. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Agenis' fourth quarter and year-end 2024 Financial Results and Corporate Update Call. Earlier today, we issued a press release detailing our financial results and key corporate development. A copy of the press release is available on our website at www.investors.agenisbio.com. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that today's discussion will include forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Please refer to our FCC filings for further details. Joining me today are Garo Harman, Chairman and CEO, Stephen O'Day, Chief Medical Officer, Robin Taylor, Chief Commercial Officer, Christine Kaskin, VP Finance and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. Now, I'll turn the call over to Garo.

A very good morning once again from a delightful day in Lexington, Massachusetts. Thank you very much for joining us. First, let me start by saying we are, as a company, pleased to report that we delivered on our commitment to significantly reduce a Genesis operational burn. By the end of 2024, we had reduced our annualized burn rate to the level that we had guided everyone. And now we are executing on our next phase of strategic cost reductions with an annualized burn to approximate 50 million by the middle of this year. And we're very much on track for that number. Our objective is to direct every available resource towards what truly matters to our stakeholders, and patients particularly, to make sure that our groundbreaking potential of BUT-BAL is realized, and patients have access to it as soon as possible. BUT-BAL continues to demonstrate unprecedented clinical activity. Recently, it was presented at major oncology forums, such as AACR Immune Oncology. It was the first year that AACR organized the Immune Oncology Division of its annual conference. ASCO-GI in January, CITSE in the fall, ESMO and ESMO-GI. And we detail the most influential peer-reviewed journals, including Nature Medicine, JCO, Journal of Clinical Oncology, and Cancer Discovery. All these were accomplished in the last 12 months or less. We are witnessing transformative clinical outcomes in colerical cancer and other tumors that have been historically unresponsive to immunotherapy. This is based on the opinion of some of the most prestigious experts in the field. In a matter of example, ButtVal has demonstrated durable, and I want to underline durable responses, and prolonged survival in refractory microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Now, this particular kind of colorectal cancer, meaning MSS, is accounting for these days over 90% of CRC. We've seen encouraging activity with the additional valve to full box, which is the standard of care, including BEDS, in first-line MSS CRC. These are early indications of activity, but in terms of both efficacy and tolerability, these early signals are very encouraging. We have also either seen complete or near complete pathological responses, very importantly, in neoadjuvant MSS, as well as MSI ICRC, Even though the trade likes to break these into two categories, we believe based on the result that we have seen, our agents are active in both categories of colorectal cancer. This has transformative potential to enable chemo, radiation, and possibly surgery free options for patients. Because in some cases, like rectal cancer, surgery, along with the other standards of care, can be debilitating for patients, particularly the fact that TRC and rectal cancer are now being seen more and more frequently in younger patients. I'd say these results, based on the opinion of our experts, are beyond promising. they are potentially revolutionary. Also importantly, these outcomes aren't just our internal assessment. Leading global oncology centers and experts are independently conducting investigative-sponsored trials, and in some cases, all we need to do is just provide product for them and we incur no costs. This independent validation by some of the most respected oncologists and oncology centers who are pivotal in securing approval in our breakthrough therapies significantly amplify our confidence in blood valve and its potential for patients. Several of these trials, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, are expected to rapidly enroll in potentially organ-sparing trials with blood trial. These trials have gotten underway. In fact, we have a new trial that's gotten underway this week with inquiries that have come in from patients ahead of the official opening of the trial. Additionally, we've strategically continued monitoring and monetizing the potential of our non-core assets, our high-value biologics manufacturing facility in Emeryville and Berkeley, our land in Vacaville to fortify our balance sheet currently, our high-priority projects. We're engaged in also late-stage partnership discussions to secure funding for butt-bowel and butt-bowel development and registration, with an emphasis on neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage, well, I shouldn't say early-stage, but intermediate-stage colon and rectal cancers, where these are clear opportunities for butt-bowel to provide significant benefit to patients. With that, I'll turn it over to Christine for a quick review of our finances. Christine?

Thank you, Garrow. We ended the year 2024 with a consolidated cash balance of $40.4 million. This compares to a balance of $76.1 million at December 31, 2023. Cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $158 million. This is reduced from $224 million for the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized revenue of $103.5 million and incurred a net loss of $232.3 million, or $10.59 per share. For the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024, we recognized revenue of $26.8 million and incurred a net loss of $46.8 million, or $2.04 per share. Our revenue primarily consists of a non-cash royalty revenue. I'll now turn the call back to Guerra.

Thank you, Christine. In summary, while we recognize that our financial position is not reflective of the high potential on the promise of our product, and it's a bit tighter than ideal, we are taking decided actions to continue to and we will continue to take very decisive actions to bolster our cash position as well as to contain costs now we're very heartened by the fact that we've had significant external validation through numerous selected high quality centers that are doing trials, such as ISDs for us, and robust clinical activity that we have seen in BALCO. These, of course, position us to advance our LEAP programs in 2025 and beyond. We remain committed and strategically aligned to deliver groundbreaking treatments for patients. This is very important because having treated now well over a thousand patients across nine different cancers with a heavy concentration on colon cancer and seen the benefit to patients. It's very heartening that we have kept our eye on developing bowel as a high priority for it. With that, I will end my poll, and I think we welcome questions that you may have.

At this time, if you would like to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad we kindly ask that you please limit your questions to one and one follow-up our first question will come from the line of emily bodnar with hc wainwright please go ahead hi good morning thanks for taking the questions maybe for the first one if you can kind of help frame the cost reductions for us particularly which programs are being impacted the most particularly on the R&D side, and especially into mid-2025 as you're guiding to additional cost cuts, which programs might be impacted there. And then secondly, if you can kind of walk us through expected catalysts for 2025 and any new data updates or regulatory updates that we should be looking out for, thank you.

So the cost reductions really center around headcount reductions. that are non-essential, meaning that even our priority being POTBAL development and registration, we have defined exactly which experts we need internally and externally, and we have significantly cut down on external advisors. We have limited external advisors to those that will benefit us the most in terms of advancing black battle to a line of registration and most of the registration work that we were undertaking under accelerated approval is already completed so should there be a window for us and we believe there will be we will utilize a lot of the work that has been completed to seek potentially registration globally so in terms of our pipeline products we have not killed them we have simply shelved them for the time being and we've done it in a way that we can reignite them because as you know we got a significant uh number of products back from our partners after they have spent in excess of 800 million dollars collectively on those products. Not because of any product performance issues, but strictly because of the fact that IO for the time being is out of fashion. Not because we believe our products are implicated in it being out of fashion, but you know in the pharmaceutical industry things go hot and cold and right now IO is cold, and that doesn't mean that it will remain cold to six months from now. So we have put them on hold with an intent to reignite them quickly. In terms of catalysts for 2025 on the regulatory updates, stay tuned.

Okay, great.

Again, to ask a question, simply press star 1 on your telephone keypad, and our next question comes from the line of Mayank Memtani with B. Riley Securities.

Please go ahead. good morning team uh thanks for taking our questions and uh appreciate the detailed update here um maybe just a similar question as asked before on uh the the process of monetization of non-core assets um uh gary if you could comment how further along you are and what sort of economics you could derive from that and then i have a follow-up Sure.

Thank you for that. And if you recall, and I'm sure that you recall, but in general, the first stage of monetization of our West Coast assets, namely Vacaville, our Berkeley facility, came in the form of a mortgage that we obtained back in November. And if you remember, prior to that, prior to the elections, it was almost impossible for us to obtain any mortgage. Impossible. But we got a $20 million mortgage at a record time of approximately two weeks. And so that was the first stage of monetization. Now, in addition to that, for those of you who have been to our Emeryville facility, know that Emeryville is a highly desired state-of-the-art manufacturing facility that is soup to nuts. It starts with cell lines, and it finishes with packaging, filling, finishing, and packaging of product. Now, given the fact that there has been significant shifts in U.S. manufacturing interests, we have seen a similar level of interest, and we are in discussions, including contract discussions, with parties for the potential consummation or monetization of our West Coast manufacturing and real estate. that um okay no that's that's helpful uh and and then are you able to uh share your latest uh and

greatest thoughts on um what uh registrational program could look like uh obviously asco gi data recently showed you know a number of different directions you could go in uh late line frontline uh obviously new adjuvant um any uh thoughts in each of those buckets that um could be helpful for folks to understand uh the path to uh market here yeah sure so um first off we have a mess a an enormous amount of data in the late state study there's no ambiguity about our ability to rescue patients

with MSS-CRC who had exhausted all other options. And these patients are now living longer, even though we haven't done a randomized trial in late stage yet. There is no ambiguity about the fact that these patients are living much longer, orders of magnitude lower than patients who have had standards of care. So we have more than double the response rates in these patients. And we have an extension of their lifespan that is, based on our current data, essentially double what you would see with standards of care. And that magnitude, of course, is of great interest to the experts in the field and patients. In fact, we have patients who are going on disease-free now, pushing three years, which is almost unprecedented. Now, that's one area where, with more mature data, we will make an effort to get the interest of regulators around the world. Secondly, the data from the neoadjuvant setting is unambiguous, because when I say unambiguous, it's really black and white. these patients are treated only with one valve so no chemo no radiation and what we're seeing is complete pathological responses in more than half patients and this has been by the way there There was some concern that the data was from a single center, Cornell. But now the data corroborates the Cornell data in 11 centers from Europe and in four times the patient. So that's very encouraging. Because of the black and white nature of the outcomes in MSSCRC and MSI Hive, we believe that there is a clear path for potential approval, particularly in a setting that will be organ sparing. For example, if a patient has MSS rectal cancer, their options are chemo, radiation, and surgery. And for these patients, rectal surgery is debilitated. And we believe that if we can show that our products are organ-sparing, that will be a significant benefit to patients.

Well, Dave, you do have to add to that. Mark, thank you for the question. I would just elaborate on what Gerald said. In the refractory setting now, between our Phase I and our Phase II trial, we have approximately 350 patients whose data is maturing. those trials have closed and the data is maturing and we look forward to really uh uh watching this durability of response and treatment-free interval uh mature and then obviously interact further with regulatory bodies around this this data and then i i think what gary said in the the neoadjuvant setting is really uh remarkable in terms of its ability to change paradigms in both the ms stable and obviously the MS high colorectal setting. And rectal cancer is within our sites as a primary first neoadjuvant sort of regulatory approach.

It's very helpful. Thank you, Tim. Looking at some of these updates in the coming months.

And by the way, we have Robin Taylor here as well, who is one of the foremost commercial and beyond commercial experts in CRC. would you like to add your equipment?

Certainly, I'm quite happy to. Maya, it's good to hear from you again. You know, I think the context has been explained certainly in terms of rectal cancer, but I would also point out that both rectal and colon cancer have a significant opportunity because we're looking at not only, you know, in rectal cancer potential for hemo sparing, sparing radiation, and also sparing and debilitating surgery, because if we improve the clinical complete response rate, those patients basically will not go on to surgery. They'll wait, and the evidence that we've seen so far with early use of immunotherapy, particularly CTLA-4, translates into a prolonged recurrence-free survival, and that's a clear benefit so across all those measures we expect we're going to be able to improve in regular cancer similarly in colon cancer uh there is that opportunity to be able to improve the event-free survival uh overall survival in the long run uh and real question about being able to reduce the amount of chemotherapy the patients are receiving particularly oxaliplatin, which has the potential for permanent neuropathy in the long run. These patients who have an infant chemotherapy may end up with permanent neuropathy that could be avoided, and that coupled with the ability to improve on event-free survival and overall survival really makes colon cancer a real significant opportunity as well um and you know finally just to note that we have um you know just there's an ist that's just initiated from oilstone heading entering uh with andrea surcheck uh phase two and recto cancer that you know they are very excited about patients very excited about which should be kicking off uh very shortly

And that will conclude our question and answer session. I'll hand the call back over to Gerald Orman for any closing remarks.

Once again, thank you very much for joining us. It's always a pleasure to have you and your questions. We're very excited about the prospects of our lead programs. There is more reason to be excited now with the longevity of data than even six months ago. and so we're grateful to our investigators and patients for participating in these trials to demonstrate the kind of results that we've come up with so far and we move forward to data maturing and our trials expending so thank you very much and that will conclude today's conference call.

Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.