Thank you and good morning. We will begin the call with remarks from Darryl White, BMO's CEO; followed by Tayfun Tuzun, our Chief Financial Officer; and Piyush Agrawal, our Chief Risk Officer. Also present to take questions are Ernie Johannson, Head of BMO North American Personal Business Banking; Nadim Hirji, Head of BMO Commercial Banking; Alan Tannenbaum, Head of BMO Capital Markets; Deland Kamanga, Head of BMO Wealth Management; and Darrel Hackett, BMO US CEO. As our call will end at 8:15 this morning, please limit yourselves to one question during the Q&A and requeue to give everyone a chance to participate. As noted on Slide 2, forward-looking statements may be made during this call which involve assumptions that have inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these statements. I would also remind listeners that the bank uses non-GAAP financial measures to arrive at adjusted results, management measures performance on a reported and adjusted basis and considers both to be useful in assessing underlying business performance. Darryl and Tayfun will be referring to adjusted results in their remarks, unless otherwise noted. I will now turn the call over to Darryl.

Thank you, Christine, and good morning, everyone. This quarter we delivered record pre-provision pre-tax earnings of $3.5 billion, up 8% over last year, driven by continued revenue growth in Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, stronger client activity in our market-sensitive businesses and the full realization of our cost synergy and efficiency programs. We met our commitment to positive operating leverage this quarter at 5.2% and year-to-date at 1.3% and we remain on track to deliver positive operating leverage for the full year. Operating momentum across our diversified businesses has been steadily improving since the start of the year. And at the same time, the cyclical increase in credit costs has resulted in loan loss provisions above our historical range, which has not met our expectations. BMO has a long history of superior credit management and that has not changed. Over many cycles, we've consistently outperformed peers and our portfolios remain strong, diversified, and well-managed. We've investigated the circumstances that led to recent impairments, and the conclusion is for some customers, the combination of prolonged high interest rates, economic uncertainty, and changing consumer preferences had an acute impact. This is presented in a relatively limited list of borrowers. For instance, only 15 accounts comprise almost 50% of year-to-date impaired provisions in our wholesale portfolio. During a contracting credit cycle, the timing of wholesale losses can be difficult to predict. While we expect provisions will remain elevated in the near term as the benefit of Central Bank easing will take time to transmit, we also expect that we will return to normalized levels in the range of our long-term average during 2025. Piyush will discuss this further in his remarks. The Bank of Canada is anticipated to continue cutting rates in increments and the Fed to begin reducing rates in September. While GDP growth has strengthened from earlier expectations, we continue to monitor evolving geopolitical events and the pace of unemployment. We're dynamically managing our businesses to support customers and deliver returns across a range of conditions and outcomes. Turning to our results and operating group performance for the quarter, adjusted net income for the third quarter was $2 billion and earnings per share were $2.64. We've had good balance sheet growth, including robust customer deposit growth across our franchise, supported by a strong capital position with a CET1 ratio of 13%. Canadian P&C delivered another quarter of record revenue, up 7% year-over-year, and PPPT up 12%. Our P&BB business is on pace for our strongest year ever in net customer acquisition, with net account growth nearly double industry benchmark and strong customer primacy, a reflection of our award-winning digital and product capabilities and our strong traction with new Canadians. It's been just over a year since the acquisition of AIR MILES, Canada's most recognized loyalty program. In that time, we've executed against key strategies and investments to revitalize the program, including a new mobile app and expanded ways to earn Miles, including offers directly linked to BMO AIR MILES credit cards. The AIR MILES brand relaunch this summer is already seeing early signs of success with double-digit growth in enrollments, app downloads, and reward redemptions. With access to over two-thirds of all Canadian households, we're creating differentiation in the market and a foundation to drive customer acquisition and engagement. In US P&C, we're seeing improving performance with revenue up over last quarter, positive operating leverage of 4.9% and a 300 basis point improvement in our efficiency ratio over last year. In Commercial Banking, loan and deposit growth is strengthening in Canada and while softer in the US, we continue to acquire new clients and increase deposit penetration. We're growing active users in our leading Treasury Payment Solution business and we received the Red Dot Award for Design Concept for redesigning the digital banking experience for small and medium enterprises. BMO Wealth Management had a strong quarter with Wealth and Asset Management net income up 44% year-over-year, driven by good growth in client assets with strong net sales in our leading ETF business and net positive mutual fund flows. We're seeing results from our investments in Asset Management as nearly all global mandates managed by our global equities team performed in the top decile, including the BMO Global Equity Fund, which received a five-star Morningstar rating. BMO Capital Markets had PPPT of $625 million within the range we've guided to bolstered by strong client activity and revenue performance in global markets, M&A, and corporate banking. We're growing our capabilities and leadership in target areas in the US, ranking number one in US agency CMO issuance year-to-date. Turning to our overall US segment, we're building on over 200 years of experience in our second home market. This fall, we'll be celebrating 40 years since our bold expansion of Harris Bank in Chicago, 15 years since the acquisition of M&I and one year since the conversion of the Bank of the West. Over this time, we've consistently grown through many economic cycles, creating value as a key differentiator for BMO and our customers. From a regional bank with $8 billion of assets in 1984, we're now a top 10 bank with national reach, strong capital and the size and scale to compete across retail and commercial banking, wealth management and capital markets. We continue to progress on our revenue synergy targets, including strong core personal customer growth with over 35% coming from our new West markets, evidence of our growing brand recognition, strong digital checking account growth, and improving branch productivity. We're augmenting talent and capabilities, including, for example, dedicated teams in wine and beverage M&A, and media and entertainment finance in Los Angeles. Transactions between commercial banking and capital markets in areas like FX hedging and treasury payments are increasing and this quarter, we closed the biggest referral of the year between commercial and wealth management. We've delivered consistent pre-provision pre-tax earnings of $1 billion or more in the US for the sixth consecutive quarter, with modest balance growth and protecting margins at a rate better than peers. While we've surpassed our synergy goals, as we've discussed, the currently muted conditions for US banking industry growth have impacted the timing of delivery on the revenue synergies from the Bank of the West. However, the overall environment is now showing signs of inflection, and the investments we've made to build the business for success position us to grow profitable market share and strengthen return on equity. At the same time, we're making a difference in the communities we serve through EMpower 2.0, our five-year commitment to break down barriers faced by underserved communities, businesses, and families in the United States, having already delivered $10 billion of our more than $40 billion commitment. In summary, our franchise is strong as evidenced by fast-growing deposit, customer base, leading customer acquisition, and deepening client relationships. We've delivered on our commitment to positive operating leverage. I'm confident that our risk culture is intact with actions in place to effectively manage risk and improve our credit performance through next year. Our teams are executing on a clear and consistent strategy for sustained operating performance that will endure through credit cycles. I'll now turn it over to Tayfun.

Thank you, Darryl. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. My comments will start on Slide 10. Third quarter reported EPS was $2.48 and net income was $1.9 billion. Adjusting items are shown on Slide 39 and the remainder of my comments will focus on adjusted results. Adjusted EPS was $2.64, down from $2.94 last year, and net income was $2 billion, down 8% as strong PPPT growth of 8% was offset by higher PCL. Record PPPT of $3.5 billion was driven by strong operating performance across our businesses with positive operating leverage of 5.2%. Excluding lower insurance revenue which was inflated last year due to market impacts related to the IFRS 17 transition, revenue was up 2% and expenses were down 1% excluding severance in the prior year. PCL increased $414 million, which Piyush will speak to in his remarks. Moving to Slide 11, average loans grew 6% year-over-year, excluding the impact of the RV loan portfolio sale and the wind-down of the indirect auto book, driven by good growth in residential mortgages and business and government loans. Strong growth in customer deposits continues with average balances up 9% from last year, driven by higher deposits in our US and Canadian personal and commercial businesses. Turning to Slide 12. On an ex-trading basis, net interest income was unchanged from the prior year as balance growth was offset by lower margins and up 5% sequentially, including the impact of two additional days in the quarter. Compared with last quarter, NIM was up one basis point. In both Canadian and US P&C, NIM decreased three basis points sequentially. Lower deposit margins continued to pressure NIM this quarter, but to a lesser extent, as pricing and the shift to term deposits is stabilizing. At the all bank level, we maintain our expectation of relative margin stability for the remainder of the year. Canadian P&C NIM is expected to tighten mainly due to higher loan growth relative to deposit growth, while US P&C is expected to be modestly higher. Turning to Slide 13. We maintain a relatively neutral position to changes in interest rates, consistent with our strategy, and we believe that we are well positioned for the declining rate environment. Moving to Slide 14. Expenses continue to be well managed and declined 5% driven by the full realization of both the Bank of the West cost synergies and broader operational efficiencies as well as the impact of higher severance and legal provisions in the prior year, which more than offset underlying growth in operating expenses and business investments. We delivered on our commitment to positive operating leverage again this quarter and expect the same next quarter despite a typical fourth quarter sequential uptick in expenses. Turning to Slide 15. Our capital position remains strong with a CET1 ratio of 13%. Internal capital generation was offset by higher source currency RWA, due to asset growth and to a lesser extent, the impact of credit migration as well as an increase in market risk RWA from the low levels in the second quarter. Our capital outlook remains strong and is still likely to remain above our 12.5% management target. Moving to the operating groups and starting on Slide 16. Canadian P&C net income was up 3% year-over-year, driven by strong PPPT performance, up 12%, partially offset by higher PCLs. Record revenue of $2.9 billion was up 7%, driven by higher net interest income, reflecting both solid balance growth and improved margins, while non-interest revenue remained flat. The transition of bankers' acceptances to loans resulted in lower lending revenue offset in net interest income. Expenses were up 2% reflecting higher employee-related operating and technology costs, partially offset by severance in the prior year. Loans were up 6%, with good growth across consumer and commercial products, and deposits were up 11%, reflecting continued growth in transactional and term products across both consumer and commercial clients. Moving to US P&C on Slide 17. My comments here will speak to the US dollar performance. Net income was down due to higher PCLs, while PPPT growth and operating leverage were strong at 6% and 4.9%, respectively. Revenue was down slightly driven by lower non-interest revenue due to lower deposit and card fees in Personal and Business Banking. Net interest income remained flat with balanced growth offset by a five basis point reduction in margins, which has actually performed better than industry trends. Expenses were down, reflecting good expense management including cost synergies and operational efficiencies and lower severance costs. Loans were up 4%, excluding the impact of the RV loan portfolio sale. Deposits were up 4% with strong growth in term and money markets, offsetting decreases in non-interest-bearing balances. Sequentially, deposits were up 1% as we see the shift in interest-bearing from non-interest-bearing deposits stabilizing. Moving to Slide 18. BMO Wealth Management net income reflected year-over-year growth of 44% in Wealth and Asset Management, offset by a decline in insurance from the impact of the transition to IFRS 17. Wealth and Asset Management revenue was up 7%, reflecting good growth in client assets and market appreciation more than offsetting lower net interest income. Expenses were lower due to severance in the prior year. Moving to Slide 19. BMO Capital Markets net income was up 31% year-over-year, reflecting continued strong PPPT of $625 million in the quarter, consistent with our guidance and partially offset by higher PCLs. Revenue in Global Markets was up 16%, reflecting higher equity and interest rate trading. Investment and corporate banking revenue was up 11% on higher advisory fees and corporate banking-related revenues. Expenses were down due to a legal provision and severance in the prior year. Assuming markets remain constructive, we expect capital markets to continue to deliver PPPT within the $625 million to $650 million range guidance provided earlier. Turning now to Slide 20. Corporate Services net loss was $236 million compared with $244 million in the prior quarter as higher revenue and lower expenses offset higher PCL. To conclude, while as Darryl said, our provisions have exceeded our expectations, similar to last quarter, this quarter demonstrated continued good operating performance with improving revenues, PPPT and positive operating leverage in line with our expectations. The steady rise in our operating performance through the credit cycle is the result of the underlying strength of our franchise and our business and geographic diversity. We will continue to execute on our strategic priorities and invest for growth and look to leverage the strength of our balance sheet and our capital to build lasting shareholder value. I will now turn it over to Piyush.

Thank you, Tayfun, and good morning, everyone. First, I'll start with some context for our overall credit position. Consistent with trends over the last few quarters, we continue to experience credit outcomes reflective of the current credit cycle. Notwithstanding the early stages of easing monetary policy in Canada and the potential for rate cuts in the US later this year, specific client segments continue to feel the impact of prolonged elevated interest rates, tightening of credit conditions as well as shifting consumer demand for products and services. Moreover, rising unemployment in Canada and reduced pandemic-related liquidity are challenging consumer and business balance sheets. This has led to credit downgrades in our portfolio with higher watch lists and impairments. On Slide 22, this quarter's total provision for credit losses was $906 million or 54 basis points. Impaired provisions were $828 million or 50 basis points, up nine basis points from last quarter, largely driven by higher provisions in our wholesale book. Canadian Personal and Business Banking impaired losses were up $27 million from prior quarter, driven by higher delinquencies and insolvencies in unsecured retail products while the mortgage portfolio continued to perform well. We continue to take actions to manage losses within these portfolios, including pre-delinquency engagement with customers most vulnerable to payment stress. In Commercial Banking, impaired losses increased $31 million in Canada and $55 million in the US. The capital markets loss this quarter was mainly driven by one account in the services sector. On Slide 23, we provide additional information on our business and government portfolio. Over the last few quarters, the wholesale portfolio has experienced negative migration and elevated losses. As Darryl noted, 15 accounts drove almost 50% of year-to-date wholesale impaired provisions. And as I've said before, in a large wholesale portfolio like ours, quarterly provisions can be variable. And in fact, this quarter, two accounts drove the nine basis point increase in impaired provisions over the prior quarter. Two sectors, we continue to monitor closely are transportation, where the trucking segment has been in a cyclical downturn with weak freight volumes and reduced spot rates, although there are early signs of stabilization, and commercial real estate where the portfolio continues to perform in line with our expectations, including a partial recovery this quarter of a prior provision. The wholesale portfolio remains well diversified with over half-rated investment grade. Moving to Slide 24. Performing provision for credit losses of $78 million primarily reflected portfolio credit migration. We have added to performing allowances for the last nine quarters and are appropriately reserved with a total performing allowance of $3.8 billion or 56 basis point coverage over performing loans. We expect credit migration will continue, which in turn will drive increases to the allowance for the next few quarters. Turning to Slide 25. Impaired formations of $1.8 billion decreased $141 million due to lower business and government formations. Gross impaired loans increased to $6 billion or 89 basis points with increases primarily in commercial real estate, manufacturing and transportation. Based on our extensive portfolio monitoring and where we are in this credit cycle, we expect impaired provisions to remain elevated over the next couple of quarters and subject to variability. As rates fall, and unemployment stabilizes, we expect credit performance will trend towards long-term averages through 2025. I will now turn the call back to the operator for the Q&A portion of this call.

Hi. Good morning. On the PCL, the guidance was for impaired to be in line with Q2. It was up nine basis points, and I get that things changed. Just curious, what surprised you when you mentioned impaired PCLs likely remain elevated for a few quarters. What gives you confidence that it's going to revert to the long-term average in fiscal '25? And is this more midway through fiscal '25, early '25? Just hoping to get some color.

Yes. No, thanks, Doug. Thanks for the question. When we look at our overall impaired PCL performance, there are several reasons for this elevated number this quarter. I think as we all know, the current environment is complex and changing rapidly. But overall, when we provided guidance, I would say our retail losses have been in a tight range of what we expected and that's pretty expected because of delinquencies and what's flowing through that book. It's influenced a little bit by Canadian insolvencies, as you've seen those continue to be high. And then in a large part, our wholesale book has also performed exactly per our expected model. So we have a long history of what our loss performance is. And to a large part, the wholesale book has actually performed in line with our expectation where it has been a little challenging is the variability on a few large names that we have discussed before. And so the variability, what I call is unexpected losses that have a lower probability seem to be a significant part of any credit cycle, and that's what you're seeing right now. So we are in a fairly tight range from that expectation. As we look forward, it's hard to give you a number or a range only because of this variability over a quarter, but over a year, we can tell you where it's coming. So we expect this will be elevated as we go through the next one or two quarters, starts to start coming down. And by the end of the year, it should start reverting to our long-term average. That's our expectation. We'll provide you more guidance as we get through next quarter.

To clarify, you are anticipating a return to the long-term average closer to the end of fiscal '25, rather than throughout the entire year. Regarding the 50 basis points, last quarter you mentioned it remains elevated and flat sequentially. We are currently in the 50 basis point range for impaired loans. This 50 basis points is seen as a proper starting point to consider for the elevated levels expected over the next few quarters. Is that accurate?

Yes. I would say when we're saying elevated, we know it's a little higher. It's hard to pinpoint a number because of this variability. If you look back at this quarter, nine basis points was two accounts. If you look back year-to-date, 50% was 15 accounts. So these one or two accounts that can move the needle a little bit more, but we expect it to be elevated. Some of it the economic environment, as you're seeing, again insolvencies and things like that. But it should start coming down towards the second half of the year because it's the elevation is the next one or two quarters.

Hi. Can you hear me now?

And just a follow-up, where you see sort of your comfortable operating range in terms of CET1? And is it more elevated now just given the environment?

No, Meny, thanks for the question. I think it's just more generalized than that. I remind myself that we just turned the DRIP discount off in Q2. And as we assess the overall environment, I think, the short answer to your question would be not yet. I think when we look at the overall environment, we're not yet in a position where buying back shares gets a full green light given the various uncertainties. I'd say various uncertainties that we see out there. And we also, at the same time, as I've always said, we want to maintain lots of capital for deployment when we see good customer opportunities, and the expectation is we'll start to see some expansion opportunities there as we go into 2025. But look, as always, we put all of those things into the hopper and we make our decisions and we'll update you again at the end of the fourth quarter based on where those conditions are. Is that helpful?

Hey, good morning. I guess a question for Piyush and maybe for Darryl on credit. So a couple of things like it seems that you have very limited visibility on credit for now. And two questions come up. One, is there an issue in terms of the bank having too many outsized credit for its size, because for a bank of BMO size, one loan, two loans moving credit meaningfully quarter after quarter is a little bit surprising. So one, just talk through in terms of how you're approaching whole size? Are these all shared national credits in the US and you're having to take these charges as you go through the review with examiners? And second, just talk through the process like given what's happened in the last two quarters, help us gain some confidence that you've done some deep dive reviews what the outcomes have been and why you have a better handle today than six months ago?

Yes. Ebrahim, thanks for that. I would say let me begin with where we are in terms of our performance. We obviously continue to look at our peers and where we are and I can't comment on any individual bank. But year-to-date second quarter, we were at 35 basis points. Our peer group was at 35 basis points. They're a bit higher right now. We'll see where everybody shapes up. In the large losses we've had, I would tell you about 70% of those credits, we're not alone. These are syndicated facilities. We have banks north and south of the border in those in different ranges, different sizes and some we're the lead bank and some other lead banks. So these aren't unique to BMO. To your point around what have we done? Well, we are always learning from what has happened and what can we change. And I would say we're not anticipating any radical changes to risk appetite, but we're always making refinements. I mean that's what good risk managers and bankers do to ensure we're capturing the evolving risks in the industry. I would tell you in the large losses, there isn't an industry theme, there isn't a geography theme. These are very episodic, but many of these loans have related to underwriting we have done around the end of the pandemic. And those were exceptional circumstances, liquidity was high. It carried consumers. It carried companies, their balance sheets are more liquid. As consumer patterns have shifted, that's one of the reasons many of these companies are right now in a position to have higher leverage or not the same operating performance as we expected. So we've gone back, looked at our entire book, combed through underwritings we've done that. And really I come down to a handful of accounts that are now on our watch list, which is why we are guiding you to a higher elevated performance for the next few quarters. Just like we've said for retail, this will get through the system. It's the same thing. We believe the position is contained. It will get through the system. It's hard to pinpoint the exact quarter. But in the next one, maybe two, maybe three these names should clear the system and that's why our confidence in reverting back to our long-term averages.

Yes. And Ebrahim, it's Daryl. I would just add to that, that when you look back, I think, what we're experiencing here is effectively the delayed consequence of the dynamics that were pretty unique to a pandemic. When you look back at that inflation surge, the unprecedented rise in interest rates, and you consider that time in 2020, for example, when we were all coming to grips with all of those dynamics around pandemic and free money was free money from government stimulus, that free money didn't discriminate where it went. Everybody got it. And that tends to, in some cases, as Piyush said, pretty limited list, but it covers up a lot of problems, which then can come back later. Inevitably, when we look through that, there will be companies that are stranded as rates rise, inflation persists, consumer preferences change, especially in certain segments. So where are we today? I think, well, on the one hand, one might say, we're seeing those conditions reversing and easing. The reality is, in some cases, the impairments and the bankruptcies are just evidencing themselves while the conditions improve, and that's what we have seen in previous credit cycles. Because for some of those instances, it's just too late. And what we're seeing is, therefore, a faster rise with higher losses than we've seen historically. I will say, except for the fact that we have to remember, we haven't had a recession in 15 years, give or take. And so when we look back to that recession, this is actually a very similar pattern to what we saw then in our wholesale portfolio, where we ended up having higher losses in our peers for a short period of time, which is unusual relative to a very long period of time. And I think that's kind of where we are now. The implications as we've done that, I think, you referred to the deep dive, Ebrahim, are pretty straightforward. I mentioned earlier that 50% of our credit losses year-to-date or from 15 accounts. When we looked into whether there are common characteristics in those 15 accounts is actually quite interesting in terms of what it wasn't and what it is. It's not local concentration within geographies in the US, for example, it's not BMO legacy versus Bank of the West. There we're pretty much pro rata. It's not a specific industry sector. What it is, is there's a vintage of, I call them, pandemic loans that might have had higher leverage and larger holds than if we were able to do them again and in some cases, expansion geographies. And in most of those cases, as Piyush pointed out, there were other banks involved. So it wasn't unique to us. I think 70% of the time, in fact, they were syndicated facilities. So look, when I look forward, I think you asked about our confidence in terms of where we go from here. We know what those conditions were. We know how to screen the rest of the portfolio for those conditions and we've done that. And that's why we feel really confident that this is known and it's bounded. And the rest of the portfolio like 99 point something percent of the portfolio doesn't exhibit those combinations of characteristics. So that's what gives us the confidence in a quarter or two that this will be behind us, but we're going to have to fight through it for the next couple of quarters. Is that helpful?

Good morning. So BMO's PCLs, as you've disclosed, have gone from 21 basis points impaired last year to 50% this year and your peers are something like 24 to 38. So clearly, something's gone wrong. And I appreciate your comments around the pandemic, but the pandemic was not unique to BMO. So as you look back, do you see can you identify the failures, like the underwriting failures, the mistakes that the bank made? And the reason I'm asking the question this way is because it has been my experience that when a bank goes through something like this. And I think the bank is clearly going through something relative to your peers, that changes need to be made and often those changes lead to subpar growth until the bank figures out what went wrong. So the question is two parts, what went wrong relative to your peers? And secondly, does this necessarily lead to a period of below-average growth as the bank retools?

In terms of did we do something different? Our credit underwriting policies, procedures are robust and we did not make any significant changes to our credit risk appetite over the past several years. I thought about this and we've taken share in the US in the last few years. It was purposeful. It was more so in specialty segments like ABL, sponsor fund lending and dealer finance. And these are not the areas where we are seeing an increase in impairment. And as you heard from Darryl and Piyush, we're not seeing systemic issues in the portfolio or losses concentrated in any segment or geography. It is broad-based. We had a growth strategy, but we didn't lose discipline. And we're going to, of course, look at our underwriting and portfolio management practices in a changing environment, but it's going to be to support continued growth and support our clients through these times.

Yeah, Mario, that is Nadim. It's Piyush. I would just add, again, exactly to the point we've said. If you think about the PCL increase in retail, it's not unique to us. It's systemic. It's the pressures you're seeing from unemployment and insolvencies. So then it gets back to wholesale. And I'm confident we've looked through our files. It's not thematic to a sector. Yes, we have a transportation finance business. So the business waiting can change some of the PCL performance. Transportation, as you know, and we've covered in our remarks, is going through a tough time, a tough cycle. But we've been in the business 40, 50 years. It's still profitable. It just happens to have a higher PCL through a cycle. We are beginning to see some improvements. We hope we'll report those improvements as we go next quarter. And then on the wholesale, the confidence that I have is because through the reviews of the losses we've gone through, they are broadly in line with our long-term expected loss models. Where you're seeing is the changes that I call unexpected losses. And these are hard to call. They're hard to call, especially when they're noncredit like events in certain cases or in many cases. If there's an auditor resignation. Are you going through a cycle where you've got a company for sale with 10 bidders, and all of a sudden, there's nobody at the end, they all go away. So those lead to some higher numbers, and that's just a function of a credit cycle. I think as this wades through in the next one or two quarters, we feel pretty good about this returning back to a normal. I think the rate decreases this is coming in the US, the transmission of what's been happening to the Canada Central Bank rate cuts. These are all positives that should flow through the system. So we'll get back to you.

Yes, Darryl, it's Daryl. I would just add to that, when you look back, I think, what we're experiencing here is effectively the delayed consequence of the dynamics that were pretty unique to a pandemic. When you look back at that inflation surge, the unprecedented rise in interest rates, and you consider that time in 2020, for example, when we were all coming to grips with all of those dynamics around pandemic and free money was free money from government stimulus, that free money didn't discriminate where it went. Everybody got it. And that tends to, in some cases, as Piyush said, pretty limited list, but it covers up a lot of problems, which then can come back later. Inevitably, when we look through that, there will be companies that are stranded as rates rise, inflation persists, consumer preferences change, especially in certain segments. So where are we today? I think, well, on the one hand, one might say, we're seeing those conditions reversing and easing. The reality is, in some cases, the impairments and the bankruptcies are just evidencing themselves while the conditions improve, and that's what we have seen in previous credit cycles. Because for some of those instances, it's just too late. And what we're seeing is, therefore, a faster rise with higher losses than we've seen historically. I will say, except for the fact that we have to remember, we haven't had a recession in 15 years, give or take. And so when we look back to that recession, this is actually a very similar pattern to what we saw then in our wholesale portfolio, where we ended up having higher losses in our peers for a short period of time, which is unusual relative to a very long period of time. And I think that's kind of where we are now. The implications as we've done that, I think, you referred to the deep dive, Ebrahim, are pretty straightforward. I mentioned earlier that 50% of our credit losses year-to-date or from 15 accounts. When we looked into whether there are common characteristics in those 15 accounts, it's actually quite interesting in terms of what it wasn't and what it is. It's not local concentration within geographies in the US, for example, it's not BMO legacy versus Bank of the West. There we're pretty much pro rata. It's not a specific industry sector. What it is, is there's a vintage of, I call them, pandemic loans that might have had higher leverage and larger holds than if we were able to do them again, and in some cases, expansion geographies. And in most of those cases, as Piyush pointed out, there were other banks involved. So it wasn't unique to us. I think 70% of the time, in fact, they were syndicated facilities. So look, when I look forward, I think you asked about our confidence in terms of where we go from here. We know what those conditions were. We know how to screen the rest of the portfolio for those conditions and we've done that. And that's why we feel really confident that this is known and it's bounded. And the rest of the portfolio like 99 point something percent of the portfolio doesn't exhibit those combinations of characteristics. So that's what gives us the confidence in a quarter or two that this will be behind us, but we're going to have to fight through it for the next couple of quarters. Is that helpful?

Thank you.

Good morning, guys. You mentioned the watch list, and I noticed it's going from 5% of the book, up from 3% at the end of '23. Can you maybe just talk about what level of credit deterioration the company has to show before they end up on that list? And just maybe you can detail some of the indications looking forward when you put a company on that list?

Sure. So we are obviously evaluating credits between our bankers and risk partners throughout a company journey with us. And as we underwrite, risk rating changes that come through because of higher leverage, weaker cash flows, lower liquidity is what drives our internal ratings. And when you get to a certain level, you put in a watch list, which really means we are evaluating you more often, we have a higher connectivity with you. I don't think that's symbolic of a problem that something bad is imminent immediately, but it just gives us a perspective on what the watch list is and are there things we need to be doing with the client, helping the client get back to where they started. So I wouldn't read more into the watches other than it's a category that allows us to continue to be highly engaged with the client and start also thinking about risk mitigation strategies, which is appropriate at that point of time. And you've seen that happen through various things we've done around risk mitigation and we continue to do that even now.

Okay. That's great. And then maybe on the US expense front. Efficiency ratio dropping a couple of hundred basis points quarter-over-quarter good progress. Can you maybe put some dimensions around where you expect that ratio to end up over the medium term? Like should we be expecting to see a return to the low 50s, high 40s in the next couple of years or are there mitigating factors that might offset cost reductions there?

Yes, as Darryl said a moment ago, our broader enterprise target in the medium term continues to be 55%. Along with that, in the US, we do expect our efficiency ratio to come down to the lower 50s. Obviously, it would require a better revenue environment in the US, and we need to realize some of the scale benefits in our efficiency ratio as we grow our US business, but yes, our target remains directionally moving that ratio towards the lower 50s, even to 50% potentially.

Good morning. I just want to follow up on the line of questioning that Mario was going with earlier. In terms of maybe stuff that went wrong over the past couple of years. I know you're saying it's normal and consistent with the industry on the consumer side. But on the commercial side, I'm just wondering if, while you were integrating Bank of the West, maybe that watch list wasn't as closely watched as it should have been?

Yes. I can begin, Gabriel, this is Piyush and then maybe Nadim can chime in. So we've done, obviously extensive diligence. I've said to you Bank of the West portfolio is fully integrated with ours. We haven't seen any different loss performance from the Bank of the West. Yes, there's a few losses this quarter. But year-to-date, it's performing exactly in line with our expectations, exactly in line with the legacy BMO portfolio. So I wouldn't say it is a geographic issue or something to do with Bank of the West. Like I said, there aren't industry themes. These are episodic events or credits that are driving some of these issues. But Nadim, I don't know if you would like to add more from the Bank of the West and what we've done.

Yes, I would just add on to exactly what Piyush said. The portfolio is behaving very, very similar from our legacy business and our Bank of the West business. If I look at our new client acquisition activity and the risk profile and the probability of defaults that are coming into the portfolio, the risk culture is very, very similar as well. We've done scrub of many accounts that Piyush talked about when we talked about the confidence we have and where we're going and that we have this contained. And I am not seeing any big changes in terms of characteristics between our portfolio and Bank of the West.

Okay. And just so I understand your credit outlook in a clear fashion. You're saying the next one to three quarters are going to be in and around the credit experience we've seen this quarter, some variability, I guess, for whatever you're calling it, idiosyncratic situations. But in and around this quarter's level for the next one to three then after that moving towards the normalized level, which would be what?

Yes. So we're saying compared to our Q3, we expect Q4, maybe Q1 to be higher. I'm not giving you a guidance around what that number is because of the variability that exists from these names. So the next couple of quarters really is one, maybe two, maybe three, but really it's the next two quarters, given our confidence of the reviews we've done on where this will be. Also, I think the transmission, as we've talked about in many calls, the transmission of central bank policy takes about 6 to 12 months to go through the system. So that should start helping the market start helping consumers. And so that's why the next couple of quarters elevated. And then after that, receding back to our long-term normal and our long-term averages are in the range of about 36 basis points that we've seen over the last 30 years.

Okay. And again this language is important here. You're saying higher than the 36 or higher than what we saw this quarter?

For the next couple of quarters, higher than what you saw this quarter.

Okay. Thank you, operator, and thank you all for your questions today. I would just wrap very quickly by saying our performance reflects both the operating momentum, which will endure and the higher credit cost, which, as you heard, we expect to moderate through 2025. Our strategic goals are firmly in place and that's because we've built competitive advantages in a highly fragmented US market, capturing our one-client opportunities across the relationships and modernizing the digital capabilities of the bank for the future. So I'm confident in the power of our integrated North American franchise to deliver long-term value and we look forward to speaking to you again in December. Thank you.

Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time and we thank you for your participation.