Good afternoon, and welcome to Cadre Holdings Third Quarter 2024 Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you and welcome to today’s conference call to discuss Cadre’s third quarter results. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during today’s call, we will be making several forward-looking statements, and we make these statements under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements reflect our best estimates and assumptions based on our understanding of information known to us today. These forward-looking statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties that face Cadre and the industries and markets in which we operate. More information on potential factors that could affect Cadre’s financial results is included from time to time in Cadre’s public reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please note that we have posted presentation materials on our website at www.cadre-holdings.com, which supplement our comments this evening and include a reconciliation of certain non-GAAP financial measures. I’d like to remind everyone that this call will be available for replay through November 20, 2024, starting at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time tonight. A webcast replay will also be available via the link provided in today’s press release as well as on Cadre’s website. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Cadre’s Chairman and CEO, Warren Kanders.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining Cadre’s earnings call to discuss our results for the third quarter of 2024. I am joined today by our President, Brad Williams; and Chief Financial Officer, Blaine Browers. During the quarter, we continued to see strong demand for Cadre’s mission-critical safety products across our law enforcement, first responder, military and nuclear markets. We’ve been pleased with the team’s overall progress and execution, consistent with our stated strategic objectives. Implementation of the Cadre operating model is ongoing, and we remain excited about the potential to further optimize processes throughout the business, driving margin expansion and increased profitability as we continue to grow. While there was a short-term impact on our financial results this quarter due to the cybersecurity incidents, business macros are strong, and we continue to see attractive long-term growth opportunities supported by Cadre’s entrenched positions in the markets in which we operate, as well as favorable industry trends related to public safety. In the context of the U.S. election, I’d like to underscore the resilience and consistency of Cadre’s business through cycles. Historically, our financial results have not been significantly affected by economic, political, geopolitical and other cycles, and we expect this to continue. As you all know, our largest market segment is law enforcement. Over multiple decades, major domestic law enforcement budgets and police protection expenditures have grown despite financial and industrial recessions and a political climate that has oscillated. In recent years, defund the police has become refund the police, and there is an expectation that regardless of which party is in office, there will be a commitment to public safety spending and ensuring those who protect and serve us are equipped with the safest and most reliable products. Looking ahead, complementing our core organic growth initiatives to capitalize on these headwinds, Cadre’s M&A program is a key component to accelerate long-term growth. We continue to aggressively evaluate a robust pipeline of potential transactions and are tracking well to further grow our platform and enhance our market leadership through M&A. Cadre maintains an advantage in pursuing targets given the strength of our balance sheet and our ability to act quickly. Based on the opportunities we are seeing and the status of active discussions, we still believe we are well positioned to announce at least one transaction before the end of 2024 while maintaining patience and discipline. With that, thank you for being with us today, and I will turn the call over to Brad.

Thank you, Warren. On today’s call, Blaine and I will provide a Q3 update and business overview, including recent trends and financial performance, followed by a Q&A session. We’ll begin on Slide 5. We made progress executing our strategic objectives during the third quarter and continued to see strong and recurring demand for our best-in-class mission-critical safety equipment. Our teams remain committed to the principles of the Cadre operating model, which is driving improvement every day throughout the organization. From a broader demand and pricing growth perspective, Cadre continues to benefit from an innovative product offering, premium brands, and leading positions across our law enforcement, first responder, military, and nuclear markets. Our mix in the third quarter was neutral. We maintain a strong orders backlog, which was $167 million as of September 30. This represents a $21 million increase from Q2, excluding Alpha Safety and ICOR. As Warren mentioned, our M&A funnel also remains strong. Blaine will outline our M&A priorities in greater detail, but the primary takeaway is that we continue to be excited about the opportunities we are actively evaluating. Based on our asset-light business model with minimal CapEx needs, Cadre’s strong free cash flow generation continues to support our M&A objectives while also enabling the company to prioritize the return of capital to shareholders. We paid 12 consecutive quarterly dividends since going public and raised our dividend earlier this year to $0.35 per share on an annualized basis. Turning to Slide 6. I’ll briefly highlight the long-term market tailwinds that investors familiar with Cadre know well. As public safety has increasingly become a nonpartisan issue, we see favorable macro trends fueling global demand for our mission-critical equipment. As Warren mentioned, Cadre’s core law enforcement and military business has always been acyclical, delivering consistent and stable growth regardless of economic, political, and geopolitical conditions. A primary reason we were drawn to nuclear safety is the similar attributes it shares as a business area with very stable organic growth. Alpha Safety has a protected market position and highly visible revenue supported by long-term contracts and recurring purchase orders. As we take a step back and look at the nuclear safety sector as a whole, we like to think about long-term market tailwinds supporting growth in terms of three key nuclear missions. The first two are related to environmental safety, which is driven by DOE mission-critical and mandated cleanup efforts, and national security underpinned by expanding national defense programs. Third is nuclear energy, which we recognize is an area of growing interest as focus intensifies on how to increase the sustainability of energy supplies globally. We see future opportunities for our nuclear safety business in conjunction with the growth of the global small modular reactor pipeline. Once SMRs become operational, their requirements will resemble those of the current commercial nuclear reactor fleet, and there will be numerous opportunities for us to win new business. We expect to see demand for ventilation, shielding, and containment products, particularly during outage cycles, much like we do with existing reactors. Turning to Slide 7, we outline the latest market trends impacting our business on a more current basis. Trends related to North American law enforcement, the geopolitical landscape, and new products have remained mostly unchanged in the last three months. Zooming in on our consumer channel, which represents approximately 8% of contract sales after the acquisitions of ICOR and Alpha Safety, I’d like to highlight that we’ve continued to see solid demand despite broader market weakness. I’ll now turn the call over to our CFO, Blaine Browers.

Thanks, Brad. I’ll kick off my comments with a review of our M&A strategy. We continue to evaluate potential transactions consistent with our highly selective key criteria listed on Slide 8. The pipeline is robust, and we see actionable opportunities to build out our nuclear platform as well as to expand our suite of core safety products for law enforcement and military. Turning now to a summary of Cadre’s financial performance. Slides 10 and 11 detail our Q3 results. On Slide 10, you’ll see us discuss the effect of the cybersecurity incidents on our short-term financial performance. Our best estimate at this time is the cyber incidents created about five points of gross margin pressure in the quarter. In Q3, we’ve expensed $1.5 million related to inventory step-up amortization for the acquisitions of ICOR and Alpha Safety. In addition, intangibles amortization and cost of goods sold was $900,000 in Q3. Combined, this created 225 basis points of headwind compared to last year. Illustrated on Slide 11 is net sales and adjusted EBITDA growth year-over-year, including our updated 2024 guidance, which I’ll discuss in more detail in a moment. At its midpoint, this outlook implies full-year revenue and adjusted EBITDA growth this year of over 17% and 21%, respectively. On Slide 12, we present our capital structure as of September 30. Our net debt leverage of 1.3x remains low with ample dry powder available to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities. Before turning to our full-year guidance on the next slide, I’d like to provide an update on the cybersecurity incident we reported last quarter. In response to the July incident, we immediately took steps to remediate the incident with the help of outside experts. During the process of reinstating the affected technology systems, we experienced a second cyber incident as we were transitioning to a steady-state environment. Fortunately, with a number of countermeasures already established, our internal and external cybersecurity teams were able to act quickly and minimize the disruption. To date, we have implemented many countermeasures to improve our infrastructure, and we’ll continue implementing additional countermeasures to protect our systems and data. Full-year guidance in August was based on the information we had available at the time as we worked diligently with cyber experts and internal teams to estimate how long it would take to resume normal operations. It’s important to highlight that customer and supplier relationships remain strong. While these incidents have had an impact on our short-term financial performance, we continue to see favorable demand trends for Cadre’s best-in-class mission-critical safety equipment across our categories. To reiterate a point that Brad made, our teams have ramped up effectively, and we’ve been pleased with the overall progress and execution, leveraging the Cadre operating model to drive constant organizational improvement. With that being said, taking into account both cyber incidents, the company has modified its full-year guidance for 2024, which is reflected on Slide 13. Cadre now expects to generate net sales in the range of $560 million to $570 million and adjusted EBITDA in the range of $101 million to $107 million. We expect capital expenditures to be in the range of $6 million to $8 million. I’ll now turn it back to Brad for concluding comments.

Thank you, Blaine. In summary, we continue to execute in line with our strategic objectives and capitalize on the favorable market trends driving strong demand for Cadre’s best-in-class mission-critical safety equipment. Complementing our core organic growth initiatives, we are actively evaluating attractive M&A opportunities to add complementary businesses with strong margins, leading and defensible market positions, and recurring revenue profiles. Supported by Cadre’s entrenched positions and favorable industry trends across our law enforcement, first responder, military, and nuclear end markets, we are confident in Cadre’s forward outlook and excited to build on our track record of superior execution and further enhance our market leadership. With that, Operator, please open up the lines for Q&A.

Our first question comes from the line of Jeff Van Sinderen with B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, everyone. And I just wanted to clarify a little bit on the cybersecurity. Regarding the revenue that did not occur in Q3, does that revenue shift into Q4, all of it in Q4? And then also, was there any impact to future booking timing or order timing? And then is it fair to say at this point that there’s really no other impact to your business other than just the timing of shipping a few orders?

Yes. So Jeff, thanks for the question. With the second incident, some of that revenue does get pushed into 2025, which is the reason for the change in guidance. There is no other impact outside of the Q3 margins and then the point I just made on the revenue shifting out. At this point, it’s contained inside Q3, and we’re focused on executing a large Q4 here. The teams have done a great job of coming back up, ensuring supply chains were intact during the incidents, allowing us to not only build inventory during the incidents but be prepared for Q4 as well.

Okay. Great. And then since you mentioned Alpha Safety, can you just talk a little bit more about what you’re seeing around Alpha’s M&A pipeline? And maybe give us a sense of how your broader pipeline stands at this moment where you might emphasize acquisitions? And it sounds like there’s no impact to that from the cyber incident. Is that correct?

That’s correct. Jeff, it’s Brad. I’ll take that one. Overall, the funnel for Alpha Safety is definitely solid, and more than solid as we look at what’s been going on, on the nuclear side of things. Companies in the funnel that we’re looking for are everything from engineered-type systems to solutions providers for large end customers, both in the U.S. and internationally. We’re also very interested in companies similar to Alpha in manufacturing certain products for the nuclear industry, where those products are repeated and supplied. These areas are where we see the most opportunity, not just in the U.S. but also internationally. If you remember, one of our strategies with Alpha Safety was to expand into Europe. We’re also keen on acquisitions that fit into that.

Okay, great. Thanks for taking my questions. I will take the rest offline.

Okay, thanks, Jeff.

Thanks, Jeff.

Our next question comes from the line of Lawrence Solow with CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Great. Good evening, guys. I guess just not to beat a dead horse with the security question, but just, I guess – so it sounds like there was a second little breach, but you guys feel pretty confident that you’ve now – it won’t happen again. Was there any kind of – did you have to increase security or expenses anymore after the second breach? And is there any, going forward, any recurring expenses or anything related to this? Or is it de-minimis?

Hey, Larry, I appreciate the question. Coming out of the first incident, we had a number of countermeasures and additional security measures in place. The second incident was managed effectively because of that, minimizing the impact. The teams did a great job on that first and then minimizing the second incident. It had a much different scope and impact on the company. After that second incident, we implemented additional measures and we’ve since engaged outside experts for more countermeasures. While we can’t guarantee prevention of future events, our environment is much more robust now than it was going back to early July. We view this no differently than any other part of the company regarding continuous improvement, and we will continue to apply resources, time, and money to ensure we harden our environment. This will be a longer-term project. There’s a list of short-, medium-, and long-term items, and we’ll continue to execute those. On a cost basis, there weren’t significant or material costs related to the second incident that we didn’t discuss in the earnings. So, I wouldn’t view this as materially changing our financial position because of these countermeasures.

And I’m just curious, Blaine, you got – so you missed the sales number because I think you had guided a little bit higher because of the second incident. But you actually managed to cut SG&A pretty significantly. I thought in the face of declining sales, that SG&A would stay up because it was just a temporary blip in the sales. So is that – some of that just incentive comp? Or any color there?

Yes. A good portion of that, Larry, was incentive comp. Obviously, on a year-on-year basis, when you look at the numbers absolutely, there’s certainly some headwind there, and we evaluated the incentive comp structure and made appropriate adjustments based on the Q3 results.

Got it. And then just last question, just broad brush. It sounds like your end markets don’t change rapidly anyhow, but it sounds like they’re all doing consistent and steady and doing pretty well without – we can talk – get into a little more detail offline, but there is no specific changes. It doesn’t feel like the election or anything in the U.S. is going to change dramatically because of the results or anything like that. So anything we should be aware of just from a top level, high level on the macro.

Not at all, Larry. This is Brad. I mean everything is in line macro-wise with what we’ve seen. As you know, that’s why we love the business overall, just the durability of it. Whether it’s elections or defund the police or COVID or industrial recessions, financial recessions, you name it, we haven’t seen any major changes like that. So nothing there to report.

Got it. Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Lawrence.

Our next question comes from the line of Matt Koranda with ROTH Capital. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Maybe trying to get at the cybersecurity question in a little bit of a different way. Is there any way to just characterize sort of sales by month in the quarter? Was it – I would assume it was down a bunch in July just given production was constrained, then maybe recovered to positive in August, and then the September incident may have sent you back negative. But like any way to kind of just give us the shape of the quarter so we can understand sort of the impact of the two incidents and how they hit the quarter?

Yes. It was – so July was the most severely impacted month in the quarter. In August, we started to ramp up, and actually September was the strongest month in the quarter despite the second incident because the teams had built up quite a bit of production and inventory in the back half of August that got shipped prior to the second incident. The other good news, Matt, is that the teams that were impacted by systems being down were still able to produce during the second incident. Some businesses were operating at 100%, others 90%, maybe 60%, or 70%. But they had the systems in place coming out of that first incident to immediately continue production. It wasn’t a case where there were significant outages like the first. I’ll also call out, and you can see it in the statement of cash flow and the balance sheet, but the teams did build inventory in September, which helps position us well for Q4.

Got it. And then if we think about – I know there’s noise from the cyber incident in the quarter, but any just rough cut on the contribution that you got from Alpha and ICOR within the third quarter?

I assume on a revenue basis, ICOR was pretty consistent with what we saw last quarter. So again, they are a little over $20 million, fairly evenly spread through the year. And then Alpha tends to be a back-end loaded business based on the timing of their projects. For them, they ramped up into Q3 from Q2 pretty significantly, call it a 20% to 30% ramp sequentially. Again, completely unrelated to the incidents, neither of those businesses were impacted.

Yes. Okay. No, that’s good to hear. And then just, I guess lastly on the guidance, I just want to get my head around, it’s a pretty steep ramp in revenue but also it would call for something in the low-20% EBITDA margin in the fourth quarter, which would be well ahead of sort of any other quarter you guys have done. Maybe just speak to sort of how we get the incrementals. Is it just a pure benefit of like, hey, we just have a whole bunch of shipments that got delayed, pushed into the fourth quarter that we get without the associated sort of SG&A costs? Maybe just kind of give us a little bit of comfort around sort of the ramp if we use the midpoint of the guide.

Yes. When we break it down a level lower, gross margins in Q4, we expect to be really similar to Q1 on a rate basis. We are going to incur incremental expenses around production in Q4 for overtime, etc. The EBITDA rate pickup in Q4, Matt, is really that leverage on the SG&A. We expect our SG&A to be more in line with Q1 rather than what we saw in Q3. Obviously, it will be one of our bigger quarters from a production output or revenue output. But like I said, the teams have the plans in place. We did build inventory in Q3. So, we are bullish on Q4. Q4 will be a tough quarter and frankly, a record quarter, but the teams have gone through the detailed plans, and we are comfortable with our outlook for the year.

Okay. Appreciate it. I will leave it there.

Our next question comes from the line of Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon, guys. And maybe on that last line of questioning, if you look at the Q4 implied run rate of 40% and then the margins as well, you are about 45% through the quarter. So, is the quarter trending in line with that? How do we think about that exit rate and the cadence into ‘25 as well? What gives you confidence in that Q4 guidance despite what’s happened?

We are already into Q4. So, a couple of things, I guess Sheila, and thanks for the question. First, the inventory position coming out looks like a very large revenue number, but some of that is really inventory sitting and ready to go or relatively ready to go with the final steps to be made. The second piece is we are looking at the schedules. We are looking at incremental days and overtime. When we think about business that operates on a four-day work week, they are looking at five-day work weeks. We’ve added days by postponing physical inventories to, again, get two or three additional days. These are all small things, but when you start to add them up, if you are running an additional day a week, you are adding 25% capacity. You add three days in the quarter, right? That gives you another 5% production capacity. You have inventory on the shelf. They do start to add up. While it’s a big number, we are comfortable with it. If we weren’t, we wouldn’t have put it out in the guidance, but it will certainly require high-level execution from the teams, but we are confident in their ability to execute.

Okay. And then maybe along the line of the cadence for ‘25 and maybe just stepping back, just given the complexity of the one-time items in the second half, how do we think about the underlying potential for the business in 2025 plus as the accretive M&A continues to roll in and you keep pushing for that 50 basis points of annual margin expansion? How do we think about the underlying business, excluding or removing the one-time complexities?

Yes. The one-timers outside of the inventory step-up, we have talked about kind of this 5-point margin pressure in Q3, which is approximately $5 million of pressure and that should bounce back. We think about next year, Sheila, we would say it’s consistent with what we had seen historically, which is the market grows 3% for military and law enforcement side, expect more in that 4% to 6% range on the nuclear side. The tough part now would be for us to think about quarterly timing. It’s pretty far out for us. As we get into 2025 and announce the guidance, we will provide a little more clarity on the timing and the pacing through the year. But nothing has really changed with our outlook. In my mind, the one-timers are just that $5 million of margin pressure in Q3 as well as the inventory step-up.

Okay. Thank you so much. Appreciate it.

Thanks Sheila.

Our next question comes from the line of Jordan Lyonnais with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thank you, guys for taking the question. For 4Q, could you give us a sense about what’s driving the sales increase? Is it explosive ordinance devices? Is it commercial sales? What’s the underlying growth by segment?

Yes. I would say the two largest areas, if you are thinking sequentially, Jordan, are really armor and duty gear. They are two of the larger businesses that definitely have some pent-up backlog coming out of Q3, as well as inventory. Those are the drivers. The EOD business on the bomb suit side is expected to be big in Q4 for us prior to the incident. In the absence of those, it would still be a big quarter for them. Those are really the three bigger drivers. So EOD suits, as expected, should see a big Q4, then armor and duty gear are more driven by the incident and that pent-up backlog.

Got it. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Mark Smith with Lake Street Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. First off, just a broad question on the nuclear business, as we look at kind of new projects and the startup of plants, what opportunities are you guys seeing, and maybe runway for how long it takes to recognize and see the benefit from some new start-ups?

Yes. Hey Mark, it’s Brad. From a startup perspective, specifically regarding small modular reactors, the cycle for us with Alpha Safety would be once those types of plants are operational and starting to create waste in the reaction type process. That’s where our products tend to come in. Don’t think of it as if a plant is being built; our products are involved in that beginning stage.

Okay. And then I just wanted to think also broadly here on the election results yesterday. Any changes in long-term outlook?

Actually, we don’t see any changes or foresee any changes as we go forward. There have been many learnings, regardless of whether you sit with Republicans or Democrats, in terms of law enforcement and the needs for continued investment in those areas. That’s a big core part of our business. We expect that it will remain the same and be strong. We don’t expect a large uptick in demand on the consumer commercial side based on the transition from a Democratic office to a Republican side. So, pretty much status quo is where we are, which is great. Innovation has been key; we’ve innovated a lot of products over the last couple of years with more in the pipeline. For us, it’s about sticking to our game and continuing to move forward. Supply chain-wise, we don’t have a lengthy supply chain that extends into Asian countries, which is good for us. Most of the supply chain is regional, giving us that ability to stay close to our manufacturing standpoint and not be affected by potential disruptions.

Excellent. Thank you.

You’re welcome.

We have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Brad Williams for any closing comments.

Thank you, operator. I would like to thank everyone again for joining us on today’s call and for your continued interest in Cadre. Thanks a lot.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you and have a great day.