Greetings, welcome to Chatham Lodging Trust First Quarter 2024 Financial Results. Please note, this conference is being recorded. And at this time, I'll turn the conference over to Chris Daly, President of DG Public Relations. Chris, you may now begin.

Thank you, Rob. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Chatham Lodging Trust First Quarter 2024 Results Conference Call. Please note that many of our comments today are considered forward-looking statements as defined by federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, as described in our most recent Form 10-K and other SEC filings. All information in this call is as of May 6, 2024, unless otherwise noted, and the company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. You can form the statement to actual results or changes in the company's expectations. You can find copies of our SEC filings and earnings release, which contain reconciliations to non-GAAP financial measures referenced on this call on our website at www.chathamlodgingtrust.com. Now I'll provide you with some insight into Chatham's 2024 First Quarter Results. Allow me to introduce Jeff Fisher, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Dennis Craven, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Jeremy Wegner, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Let me turn the session over to Jeff Fisher. Jeff?

Thanks, Chris, and I certainly appreciate everyone joining us this Monday morning for our call. As you know, we beat first quarter consensus estimates as we combined RevPAR growth of 2%, together with an almost 20% increase in our other operating profit line, and property tax refunds on a couple of our California hotels. We generated free cash flow of $8.3 million in the quarter, up 10% over the 2023 1st quarter. From an asset management perspective, we're laser-focused on driving free cash flow any way we can, whether that's by increasing revenue or market share, increasing flow-through or enhancing ancillary operating profits. And in the first quarter, we drove other departmental profits up almost 20% as we increased parking rates in certain markets and enhanced our retail market operation product offerings and pricing. The year-over-year increase added $0.01 of FFO to our first quarter performance. The RevPAR increase of 2% was split evenly between occupancy and ADR and was substantially greater than industry performance, above Hilton's North American performance and right in line with Marriott's performance. Generating RevPAR growth and outperformance despite the bad weather in February and the shift of Easter from April last year into March this year is noteworthy. Our RevPAR was boosted by RevPAR growth of 17% at our 5 tech hotels in Silicon Valley and Bellevue, and we saw occupancy gain 1,200 basis points at these hotels to 67%, by far the highest level since 2019. Excluding the 5 tech-driven hotels, first quarter RevPAR was down 1%, but still up over 2019 levels by 3%. Even better news is the strength we're seeing in April with RevPAR up 5% over 2023 and up 4% over 2019 levels, with tech hotel RevPAR up 12% in April and RevPAR for all hotels, excluding those same 5 tech hotels in April, was up 3.6%. Tech hotel occupancy finished at 73%, only 400 basis points off the 2019 levels, more encouraging news on the surging demand out there. April RevPAR growth exceeds most peers that have reported and supports our thesis that we should continue to outperform the industry and most of our peers in 2024 due to surging demand in our primarily tech-driven hotels. Within Silicon Valley, we're confident that the corporate demand growth we saw in the first quarter in April will continue. Additionally, tech companies are moving forward with their intern programs. This year, many of the companies are providing a stipend to each intern to cover room and meals, and the intern can choose where to stay. We're already seeing some intern bookings, not at the level of prior years, but as we talked about in February, so long as the intern programs are active, that is going to generate compression in the market which is something we did not have last year. And obviously, compression boosts occupancy and overall RevPAR results. Mountain View is our strongest market in the quarter, up 19%, as we saw meaningful gains in business travel, specifically from our top accounts here such as Google, Broadcom, and SureFox. Market demand growth has been upper single digits and long-term, the market sets up well for us as new supply is 0. RevPAR at our 2 Sunnyvale hotels gained 12% in the quarter, and this market too is showing good underlying fundamentals. Demand is up 13% and future supply is up 1%. We're seeing corporate demand from our top accounts, Apple, Google, Intuitive Surgical, and Applied Materials, specifically from the start of construction at the big Epic center with the garage getting going and that, as we've talked about many times, should be very beneficial for these 2 hotels over the next few years. San Mateo RevPAR growth was 6% in the quarter versus 2019 and has recovered more than the 3 other Silicon Valley hotels. One aspect to that story is that recently the 476-room Marriott San Mateo permanently closed its stores, which will increase Marriott system demand in the market, and we should see some increased production here as well. During the quarter, we sold the Hilton Garden in Denver Tech for $18 million, and including deferred renovation costs, the hotel was sold for an approximate 4 cap on 2023 NOI. We intend to continue to opportunistically sell some hotels this year with the goal of redeploying those proceeds into higher RevPAR and higher growth hotels and markets. Typical sales targets are going to be hotels with absolute RevPAR lower than absolute RevPAR and margins and probably hotels that are older, that need some upcoming CapEx or regular cycle renovations. We're targeting sales proceeds of $40 million to $100 million, continuing to sell these types of hotels while buying, as I said, higher growth, higher RevPAR, and higher margin hotels will enhance shareholder value and cash flow. With respect to hotel investments, we are seeing more deal volume, and we hope to have an acquisition announced this quarter. Acquisition targets are coming from developers looking to recycle their own capital as well as owners who are facing some meaningful risk related to refinancing and the effects therefrom. As we all know, the levels of CMBS debt maturing in '24 and '25 are pretty staggering for the industry and should provide additional opportunities for well-capitalized owners like us with the capacity to buy. I want to switch gears to address our capital structure as it's been a critically important focus for us over the last few quarters, especially. At quarter end, we are at the lowest leverage levels in over a decade with leverage ratio under 25% and a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio a very healthy 4x. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we further enhanced our financial strength, raising $50 million via increased borrowings under our term loan. We currently have 25 hotels that are unencumbered. Over the past few years, through a combination of asset sales, free cash flow, and the issuance of common and preferred equity, we've repositioned our balance sheet to handle the meaningful tranche of maturing debt this year, debt that dates back to 2014 during one of Chatham's highest growth phases since our IPO. We are well-capitalized to repay all maturing debt this year. In April, we repaid the $29 million maturing mortgage on the Residence Inn Anaheim, and we have $255 million maturing in July. Let me tell you, it's great to put this overhang behind us because we've heard about this for some time from analysts and investors, and I'm proud of the work our team has been doing on this front, and I'm sure our investors will share my sentiment. Including our $260 million credit facility and our upsized $140 million term loan, we have $400 million of floating rate debt exposure that will allow us to benefit from what should be a declining interest rate environment in the future. So in conclusion, we remain confident that Chatham is well-positioned to outperform most peers as we have the most internal growth upside, we think of most other lodging REITs, especially within our tech hotels. The remainder of our portfolio is performing well. New supply is less than 1% across our submarkets, and our balance sheet is in great shape to be opportunistic on the transaction front.

Thanks, Jeff. Within our tech markets, in addition to Silicon Valley, our Residence Inn Bellevue has been thriving this year with RevPAR growth of 40% in the quarter, and that's almost entirely due to occupancy growth of 37%. Demand growth was almost 20% in the Bellevue market as we are seeing acceleration in all business travel segments. Our standard retail segment, which is BT, room demand was up over 1,800 room nights or approximately 42%. And importantly, special corporate, meaning our key corporate accounts, was up over 1,800 room nights or 55%. Amazon, Microsoft, Accenture, and ByteDance or TikTok, all of which are historically top accounts for us, generated over 1,500 room nights in the quarter and demand from Meta and Toyota is surging as we look forward 60 days. In November, Amazon opened a portion of the Sonic building in Bellevue welcoming more than 1,000 employees and intends to double its Bellevue workforce from 10,000 to 20,000 employees over the next couple of years. ByteDance has also expanded its office presence in Bellevue with 2 new office leases, and with supply projected below 1% in the Bellevue market, this corporate expansion is very good news for the hotel and for us, and it's going to help us continue to outperform. Some additional RevPAR tidbits from the quarter. Our first quarter RevPAR was not impacted by any renovation impact as we had 3 hotels with renovation disruption in each of the first quarters of '23 and '24. First quarter weekday occupancy was the highest since 2019. And for the first time since the pandemic, first quarter weekday occupancy outpaced weekend occupancy. Deployments. We continue to monitor. San Francisco's airport saw international passenger traffic surpass 2019 levels in February and March for the first time since 2020. Total domestic traffic into SFO is up approximately 3%. At CTech, international deployments were up approximately 15% through February and domestic is up about 1%. We're seeing most of that inbound travel generally coming from the Asia region. Outside of our tech-driven markets, our 7 primarily leisure-oriented hotels, that comprise approximately 19% of our first quarter room revenue, saw RevPAR increase 1% year-over-year. Top gainers were Anaheim and Portland. And on the downside, our worst performers were Destin and Savannah. Weekday and weekend occupancy were approximately 70% for each of those periods with weekday ADR of $173 outpacing weekend RevPAR of $163, and that $10 gap compares to a $4 gap in the first quarter last year. Our top 5 RevPAR hotels were led by the Residence Inn Fort Lauderdale with RevPAR of $273, which was flat to last year. Our Residence Inn San Diego Gaslamp at $195, followed by our Hilton Garden Inn Marina Del Rey at $167 despite being under renovation and then followed by our Residence Inn Mountain View at $158 and our Residence Inn Washington, D.C. and White Plains, New York, both with RevPAR of $154. At our 38 comparable hotels, GOP margins were down 120 basis points, with the majority of that attributable to labor and benefits which adversely impacted margins by 110 basis points. On a CPOR basis, these costs are up approximately 6% year-over-year. Labor costs, which are by far our largest expenses, have stabilized over the past 9 months or 3 quarters. Our first quarter average hourly wage is essentially unchanged from our 2023 third and fourth quarter hourly wages. Our employee headcount remains about 20% below pre-pandemic levels, and we are not experiencing really any labor supply shortfalls around our markets. Thankfully, as we've talked about for a few quarters now, our margin comparisons will become easier after the second quarter as we were still ramping up housekeeping and other brand-required expenses in the first half of 2023. Our top 5 producers of GOP in the quarter were led by our Gaslamp Residence Inn at $2.5 million, the ninth straight quarter it has led our portfolio, followed by our tech-heavy Sunnyvale 2 Residence Inn with $1.5 million of GOP, and third was our Residence Inn Fort Lauderdale, and rounding out the top 5 were our Courtyard Dallas Downtown and our Embassy Suite Springfield, which managed to reach our top 5 despite being under renovation for most of the quarter. Importantly, looking into hotel GOP at our 5 tech-driven hotels, hotel GOP of $5.3 million was up a strong 22% over the 2023 first quarter. GOP margins for the 5 hotels were up 110 basis points, and GOP at our Residence Inn Bellevue was up approximately 80%. Tech hotel EBITDA was up almost $1 million or over 25%. So again, encouraging trends coming out of these markets. As we've previously disclosed, if we get back to 2019 EBITDA levels, we would add approximately $16 million of EBITDA or over $0.30 of FFO. With respect to capital expenditures, we spent approximately $10 million in the quarter and still expect to spend about $37 million in 2024. During the quarter, we completed renovations at our Hilton Garden Inn Marina Del Rey, our Homewood Suites in San Antonio, our Hyatt Place Cherry Creek; and lastly, our Embassy Suites in Springfield, Virginia. We have no renovations planned for the second quarter.

Thanks, Dennis. Good morning, everyone. Our Q1 2023 hotel EBITDA was $21 million, adjusted EBITDA was $18.9 million and adjusted FFO per share was $0.16. We were able to generate a GOP margin of 38.6% and hotel EBITDA margin of 30.8% in Q1. While our Q1 GOP margin was down 120 basis points from our Q1 2023 margin, we are seeing a stabilization of most of the large cost increases that we saw in the second half of last year. Our Q1 hotel EBITDA margin increased 10 basis points versus Q1 2023 due to approximately $800,000 of property tax refunds received in Q1 of this year. Our balance sheet remains in excellent condition, and we have made significant progress on our plan to address debt maturities. In January 2024, we completed the sale of the HGI Denver Tech for approximately $18 million, which included expected renovation costs of approximately $6 million, representing an EBITDA multiple of 20.5x and a cap rate of 3.8%. Our cash balance at the end of Q1 was $72.3 million, which together with $50 million of incremental proceeds raised through an add-on to our unsecured term loan that we closed last week, provide a pro forma quarter end cash balance of $122.3 million. With a pro forma cash balance of $122.3 million and $260 million of undrawn availability under our revolving line of credit, our pro forma total liquidity of $382 million exceeds the $281 million of remaining debt outstanding at March 31 that matures in Q2 and Q3 by over $100 million. We are currently in the process of executing $60 million of CMBS financing, which will further reduce the revolving credit facility utilization required to address our remaining debt maturities. We expect the CMBS financings to close in the next month and have rates in the 7% to 7.25% area. As of March 31, Chatham's net debt to LTM EBITDA was 4x, which is significantly below our pre-pandemic leverage, generally in the 5.5 to 6x area, despite the fact that EBITDA has not fully recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Turning to guidance for Q2. We expect RevPAR growth of 2.5% to 4%, adjusted EBITDA of $28.7 million to $30.4 million and adjusted FFO per share of $0.33 to $0.36. Our Q2 cash interest expense guidance of $7.7 million reflects the $50 million term loan add-on we completed in early May and assumes $60 million of CMBS issuance in the second half of May. We expect Q2 interest income of approximately $700,000. Second quarter interest expense and interest income do not represent run rates for Q3 and Q4 as our cash balances are much higher in May and June due to the borrowing of money in May to fund the July debt maturities. With respect to hotel EBITDA margins, in general, we expect year-over-year margin comparisons to be much easier starting in Q3 as we begin to lap the fuller staffing levels and other costs that were not completely reflected until the second half of last year. Year-over-year EBITDA margin comparisons in Q2 2024 are impacted by approximately $1.2 million of one-time benefits that positively impacted margins in Q2 of 2023. This concludes my portion of the call. Operator, please open the line for questions.

And our first question today comes from Aryeh Klein with BMO Capital Markets.

Can you provide a little more color on the weekend occupancy dynamics and what you think might be driving that and is there an element of consumer softness that you're seeing, where low-end consumer seems to be feeling a little more pressure these days?

Aryeh, this is Dennis. Yes, I think for the first time in a while, first quarter weekend occupancy was about the same as weekday. It was down, as you noted, 200 basis points, really driven by Savannah and Destin. And I think consistent with what you've heard from other hotel owners, if you had exposure in certain parts of what I would call Florida or other high leisure markets that really spiked in '21 and '22 from the pandemic, those have seen a little bit of a pullback. And I think as we've talked about really now for over a year is that we believed and expected that the leisure markets would soften. And as you started to see, finally people getting back into the office and working is eventually transitioning that leisure-oriented travel to be more business travel. And I think that's essentially what we saw. If you look at our 7 hotels, I think we talked about Destin and Savannah were the worst. But really, outside of that, we had a good mix. Anaheim was up 15%, Pittsburgh was up 11%, Portland up 11%, Portsmouth, New Hampshire down 4%, and Fort Lauderdale was up 1%. So I think it's really just specific to where those leisure hotels are, but again kind of not surprising.

Got it. You mentioned what you're doing with other revenues, such as parking, to drive growth and profit. What additional opportunities do you see in that area?

Yes, I think we made significant pricing adjustments in March regarding parking. At some hotels, we are implementing surge pricing initiatives. For instance, during events like a multi-day Taylor Swift concert, where guests stay for several days, we usually charge $10 per night for parking. However, many nearby parking facilities alter their pricing during major citywide events. From a hotel standpoint, we should adopt similar strategies. This means being more flexible and proactive in assessing market demand from a lodging perspective to see how we can increase parking revenue. Additionally, we've concentrated on our retail offerings over the past 6 to 12 months to ensure we provide convenient items, especially beer, wine, and, in some areas, liquor, while also evaluating our pricing. We still see potential for growth in this area.

And then just on the tech intern plans and the flexibility that companies are providing out there. Do you think that, that's the new normal? And do you have a sense of the size of the intern program this year relative to what they were previously?

There were virtually no interns last year, so we expect a significant increase this year. Currently, intern levels are still below those of 2019 when considering the overall programs. However, the stipend program is important because it offers various accommodations in the markets, such as apartments, short-term rentals, Airbnbs, and corporate housing. This flexibility allows interns to have more control over their arrangements. Let me clarify that these accommodations have always existed. As mentioned earlier and in our February discussion, any growth in these intern programs, whether at our hotel or through other offerings, was absent last year and should benefit the entire market as we approach summer and the upcoming programs. Most companies we partner with are hosting internships, the majority of which are offering stipends, although a few are not, and we are in regular contact with them.

Of course, this is Jeff. The change means, again, a lack of visibility on our part relative to the quantity overall. So we're not being coy here. We know the business will be there. We know the markets will be up. They already are up substantially, as you've heard. But if you're not able to negotiate directly with those companies like we have in the past, then we just have to do all we can to attract those folks compared to the different sources they've got.

Our next question is from the line of Bryan Maher with B. Riley Securities.

Just a couple for me today, maybe for Jeremy or Dennis, on the cost pressures, can you tell us kind of where you're seeing the most and the least relief in those categories?

Yes. I mean, listen, I think surprisingly, I think as I've talked about in our prepared remarks, staffing is really not much of an issue across most of our markets. I think we've obviously heard a lot of things going on in California with respect to fast food minimum wages, that really hasn't impacted us at all. Out in those markets, there really aren't a whole lot of what I would call large-scale cost increases that we sit here and are worried about at the moment. If you look at our P&L corporate real estate taxes, just from a pure comparable basis, and thankfully, we benefited from some refunds in the first quarter. But in general, if you look at our largest increases in expenses, it's really probably real estate taxes and property insurance.

Health insurance is...

Yes, health insurance.

Yes, that was the last thing I wanted to mention, which is that health insurance continues to be a significant issue for everyone, as it seems we experience double-digit increases almost every year.

And on the positive side, for utilities, we're starting to see costs actually come down year-over-year there. So should be a little help.

Do you expect any more tax refunds that move the needle at all? Or is that pretty much behind you?

We don't expect anything, but we're constantly appealing assessment. So you never know. I mean, we've reflected everything here that has happened or that we know about, but we'll keep pushing.

Okay. And then just last for me, it seems like we should be expecting more capital recycling with dispositions and likely acquisitions over the next, let's say, 6 to 18 months than we've seen in a little while. Can you tell me, and maybe for Jeff, what is the criteria that you're looking for kind of the most, maybe kind of 1, 2 and 3 on the list of markets that you want to enter? Is it migration? Is it business growth? What is it in a market that you're looking for?

I think, yes, just to kind of buttress what you're saying, we were very encouraged by the ability to sell that Denver Tech hotel at the number we did. We were encouraged by a relatively high number of bidders that were on the deal. So that really caused us to take a real hard look at our 10-year CapEx plan, the cycle renovations and other renovations that would be coming up, age of hotels. And of course, the world's difference since COVID. There are markets that were very strong, which just are either slow to recover or we don't think really have a lot more upside left in them. Those are hotels that we're going to sell. And we want to be in markets where the population growth is strong. Any time we bought a hotel or developed a hotel in a market where population growth was strong, business growth was strong because that's still the core of what we do around here. As you know, I mean, 80% of these hotels, our business trends and related or corporate hotels show you the strength that we're having this year so far. And that will be our focus for hotels that we try to acquire. They should be 10 years old or less for the most part. And we do see some deals that are brand-new deals where some developers need to take care of some maturities or recycle their own capital for some other hotels they may have under construction around the country. There's still a few folks out there that have some older pipelines, meaning deals that already are underway because we all know there's not a ton of brand new deals getting started, and we see that as a decent source of acquisitions also.

The next question is from the line of Tyler Batory with Oppenheimer.

This is Jonathan on for Tyler. First one for me is on RevPAR in April, obviously, very strong. Can you provide some additional color on that strength, how that number came in maybe versus your expectations and kind of the puts and takes that impacted the month with Easter shifting out and pass over standing alone?

Yes, this is Dennis. It begins with our tech hotels, where RevPAR increased about 12% in April for those five locations, which is a strong performance. Additionally, we observed some positive trends throughout our portfolio, particularly in business travel markets rather than leisure ones. Washington, D.C. performed exceptionally well for us; we have three hotels there, and the Embassy Suites did impressively despite undergoing renovations for much of the quarter. Our suburban hotels in New York also experienced notable growth. It primarily starts with the tech hotels and is supported by strong overall demand from business travelers. We're optimistic that this momentum will continue. As Jeff mentioned, the current booking window is quite short, making it difficult to project aggressive numbers. However, we were encouraged by the performance we saw in April, especially regarding weekday travel. If we can replicate this in May, as rates begin to rise, we could have a very good quarter.

Okay. Very helpful. And then maybe switching gears on the Los Angeles market. Any thoughts overall on that market? What's driving the underperformance relative to your expectations that you mentioned? And kind of your outlook or what needs to happen in that market to get back to 2019?

Yes. Until about six months ago, it was one of our best markets. However, it experienced a weak fourth quarter and first quarter. Some of this was related to weather, but as we discussed, it seems to be more focused on LA. Currently, there is not much business travel in that market. We are beginning to notice some improvement, particularly at our Woodland Hills and Marina Del Rey hotels. Additionally, our Anaheim Residence Inn performed well in the first quarter. The key is increasing business travel into downtown and near Warner Center.

At this time, we have no additional questions. I would like to turn the floor back to Jeff Fisher for any closing remarks.

Well, thanks, everybody, for being on the call again. And I think I'll just pick up from where Dennis left off saying that as we look at the guidance given for the second quarter and the rest of the year, we certainly are, I think, on the conservative side, but we are taking a wait-and-see attitude for the most part as to the kind of RevPAR results that we might see through the quarter and the rest of the year, but we are very encouraged by April numbers. We're very encouraged by the strength we've seen already into May, and we will continue to push the envelope, as I said in my prepared remarks, on all fronts to continue to propel these earnings and FFO for the company. Thanks for listening.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.