Greetings. Welcome to the Gulfport Energy Corp Third Quarter 2021 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I’ll now turn the conference over to your host, Tommy Renouard. You may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to Gulfport Energy Corporation's third quarter of 2021 earnings conference call. I'm Tommy Renouard, Senior Analyst of Investor Relations. Speakers on today's call include Tim Cutt, Chief Executive Officer; and Bill Buese, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. I would like to remind everybody that during this conference call, the participants may make certain forward-looking statements relating to the company's financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. We caution you that actual results could differ materially from those that are indicated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Information concerning these factors can be found in the company's filings with the SEC. In addition, we may reference non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations to the comparable GAAP measures will be posted on our website. An updated Gulfport presentation was posted yesterday evening to our website in conjunction with the earnings announcement. Please review at your leisure. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Tim Cutt, CEO.

Thanks, Tommy, and good morning, and thank you for joining the call. I'll begin this morning with a summary of the third quarter highlights followed by an operational update before turning the call over to Bill to discuss the financial updates of our full year 2021 guidance. As you saw from our earnings release, we made steady progress on numerous fronts during the quarter. We put a new credit facility in place that increases our liquidity by $160 million and accelerates our ability to return capital to shareholders, as demonstrated by the announced $100 million share repurchase program. The six-well Angelo pad was completed in the Utica, which is currently flowing at a rate of 200 million cubic feet per day. Finally, the company fully resolved its largest post-bankruptcy litigation exposure with TC Energy and announced the Settlement Agreement relating to its own standing litigation with Stingray Pressure Pumping in September. I'm pleased to have this litigation behind us so that we can focus on the company's tremendous opportunities moving forward. Moving to our third quarter operational results, production averaged 973 million cubic feet of gas equivalent per day during the quarter, slightly above expectations, driven by strong reservoir performance from both the Utica and the SCOOP development programs. We anticipate an increase in total production during the fourth quarter, driven by a strong contribution from the Angelo pad. Gulfport invested $81 million of capital in the third quarter. We continue to identify opportunities to lower our total drilling and completion costs. However, we remained primarily focused on delivering peer-leading development cost per Mcfe produced. Moving forward, we continue to target a maintenance-level of capital spend of approximately $300 million per year, despite service cost inflation. This level of spend is expected to result in roughly 1 Bcf equivalent per day of production, improved well performance, and longer flat time periods resulting from our new development spacing and completion designs provide this opportunity, allowing us to deliver more molecules with less capital. Regarding 2022 guidance, we're exploring ways to improve cost efficiency by potentially moving to a continuous one-rig drilling program in both the Utica and SCOOP. Turning now to our development program, I'm pleased to report that our results for both the SCOOP and Utica are outperforming historical development results. On page 13 of the IR deck, you'll find recent results from our 2021 Utica program. The Shannon and Hendershot wells have been online for approximately eight months and remained on plateau. In addition, our Morris and Gehrig pads have been online for several months, and we are seeing similar and promising early time data. These wells are located in the southern portion of the play in Monroe County, and we are very encouraged with how these wells are performing as compared to historic wells in the same area. Finally, you can see the rapid build of the indoor wells to their target production rates ahead of schedule. We expect the Utica 2021 development program production to stay relatively flat through November and start to decline in December as the Shannon and Hendershot wells decline in pressure. We believe that the strong performance is driven by the move to wider spacing and optimized frac jobs. On slides 14 through 17, we have highlighted our Angelo pad development. This is our most substantial test of our new development program approach to date. We have provided a picture of the simul-frac operation on page 14 of the IR deck. This operation enables us to complete the wells in 60 days versus 90 days using normal fracking techniques. We completed an average of just over nine stages per day versus our historical six per day and are encouraged by the fact that we achieved multiple days above 12 stages and a record day of 16. We are very pleased to achieve 100% reuse of produced water for fracking operations and plan to utilize dual fuel rigs and frac spreads for future operations, which will lower costs and improve environmental performance. You will see on slide 15 that we utilized two snubbing units to grow out the Angelo well simultaneously, which accelerated production startup into a high commodity price environment by 10 days. As shown on slide 16, production was brought online at target rates ahead of schedule and is expected to remain on plateau for an extended period. The estimated drilling completion costs are consistent with our new development approaches to $750 a foot and when applying lessons learned from the Angelo pad, there are additional opportunities for improvement. Moving to the SCOOP development results, we experienced strong production from the asset during the quarter, an increase of 12% from the second quarter. In addition, as you can see from slide 12, the wells are declining at a slower rate than budgeted, resulting in cumulative rates performing much better than historical Gulfport wells. We attribute the improved performance to wider spacing and longer laterals and are pleased with the results today. We are currently running one rig in the SCOOP and plan to return to fracking operations in January of 2022. We continue to focus on improving the company's cost efficiency. As discussed during the last call, costs are expected to decline by $0.43 per Mcfe or 23% year-on-year, which significantly improves our margins, and is expected to provide substantial and sustainable free cash flow generation moving forward. The LOE for the quarter was up slightly, primarily due to increased water holding costs. However, the full year guidance remained consistent at $0.14 per Mcfe for 2021. Reducing corporate overhead remains a key initiative for the management team, and we have lowered recurring cash G&A guidance by $3 million compared to the midpoint of our previous guidance provided in August. We expect to achieve top quartile G&A costs of $0.12 per Mcfe for the full year 2021 and maintain this run rate into 2022. In closing, as always, we are fully committed to safely executing in the field and improving our environmental, social, and governance performance with our corporate structure, reducing overhead, and are focused on optimizing our development program to deliver the highest returns possible for our investors. I'll now turn the call over to Bill to discuss our financial results and 2021 guidance.

Thank you, Tim, and good morning everyone. As Tim suggested in his remarks, we had another solid quarter, both operationally and from a financial perspective. I will spend my time this morning providing a brief overview of our third quarter financial results, some details surrounding our recent credit facility amendment, our improved liquidity position, share repurchase authorization, and updates to our 2021 guidance before opening the call up for Q&A. For the three-month period ending September 30th, 2021, we reported a net loss of $461 million and generated $171 million of adjusted EBITDA driving the net loss of $529 million unrealized loss associated with our commodity derivatives portfolio. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $126 million during the quarter, and we generated free cash flow of $70 million for the same period. To ensure our ability to fund our capital program and generate free cash flow going forward, we continued to enter into commodity derivative contracts during the quarter. For the remaining three months in 2021, we currently hold natural gas swap and collar contracts totaling approximately 800 million cubic feet per day with an average floor price of $2.65 per Mcf. We also have natural gas swap and collar contracts totaling approximately 550 million cubic feet per day at an average floor price of $2.66 for 2022 and contracts totaling approximately 65 million cubic feet per day at an average floor price of $3.39 per Mcf for 2023. Please see our Form 10-Q for additional details on our derivative portfolio. Turning to our balance sheet, at the end of the third quarter, total assets were approximately $2.1 billion, while total gross debt was approximately $750 million, consisting of $35 million outstanding under our revolver, $165 million outstanding under our term loan, and $550 million of outstanding senior notes. We also had $4 million of cash and $115 million of letters of credit outstanding at the end of the quarter. On the liquidity front, we exited the third quarter with approximately $228 million of total liquidity, made up of the $4 million of cash and approximately $224 million of borrowing capacity under our facility. On October 14th, we announced a comprehensive amendment and restatement of our credit facility. We believe that the amendment provides the necessary financial flexibility we need to execute our ongoing business plan. It also accelerated our ability to return capital to shareholders, as evidenced by our recently announced repurchase program. The amendment provides for, among other things, an $850 million borrowing base, a $120 million increase in aggregate elected lender commitments from $580 million to $700 million, the repayment of the term loan under the exit facility, the elimination of the $40 million availability blocker, and a maturity date extension to October 2025. The amendment reduces the applicable rate for borrowings under the facility by 125 basis points through the elimination of the 100 basis point LIBOR floor and by decreasing the price grade by 25 basis points at each level of utilization. The new agreement requires the company to maintain as of the last day of each quarter, a net funded leverage ratio of less than or equal to 3.25 times and a current ratio of greater than or equal to one time. While there are other modifications to the agreement, this should give you a good feel for some of the key items addressed. Overall, we think the amendment was an extremely positive outcome for the company. Pro forma for the credit facility amendment, liquidity at September 30th increased by $160 million to approximately $388 million, comprised of the $4.5 million of cash and $384 million of available borrowing capacity under the new credit facility. As announced in yesterday's release, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of the company's outstanding shares of common stock. The authorization is valid through December 31st, 2022. The timing and amount of any share repurchases will be subject to available liquidity, market conditions, credit agreement restrictions, applicable legal requirements, and other factors. We intend to utilize the repurchase program opportunistically using available funds, while maintaining sufficient liquidity to execute our capital development program and to pay down debt. We believe the share repurchase program, which is executed at today's share price, would represent over 5% of our outstanding common shares, is a meaningful first step in our commitment to return capital to shareholders. The company will continue to evaluate all options, including potentially increasing the size of the share repurchase program and instituting a common share dividend program in future quarters. Any additional initiatives will be market liquidity driven and largely governed by our new credit facility. Moving on to guidance, we narrowed our 2021 total production guidance to 980 to 1,000 million cubic feet equivalent per day. Our 2021 guidance for LOE and GP&T expense remained unchanged at $0.13 to $0.15 per Mcfe and $0.92 to $0.96 per Mcfe respectively. Our 2021 guide for recurring G&A expense was lowered to a range of $42 million to $44 million, the midpoint of which is 17% lower compared to 2020 and is in line with top quartile performance at $0.12 per Mcfe. Excluding acquisition and divestiture activity, our 2021 guidance for capital investment remain unchanged at $290 million to $310 million with approximately $20 million of capital associated with land and leasehold activities. As little over two-thirds of the 2021 capital budget will be allocated to the year ago. Finally, we increased our full year 2021 free cash flow guidance by $55 million at the midpoint to a range of $345 million to $365 million at current share pricing. Please see our earnings release for a few additional details on our 2021 guidance. In summary, we believe that our efficient asset base continues to support a low investment rate and the potential for strong returns of capital to shareholders. Our 2021 free cash flow yield remains the best in our peer group, and we believe that our ability to generate significant free cash flow going forward is still largely underappreciated. Our business plan remains committed to developing our assets in a disciplined manner, investing approximately $300 million of capital to deliver roughly 1 billion cubic feet per day of equivalent production while targeting annual free cash flow of more than $350 million at a $3.50 natural gas price. Finally, while liquidity has improved, largely due to the amended credit facility, we expect it to get even better as we execute our business plan. As stated last quarter, we believe that our ability to deliver peer-leading free cash flow provides a unique opportunity for investors. While we still plan to prioritize debt repayment in the near term, we are excited by our recently announced share repurchase program and we're eager to share our plans for returning additional capital to shareholders in future quarters. With that, we will now open the call up for questions.

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Neal Dingmann with Truist. You may proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning, everyone. Tim, Bill, thank you for the early insights. I have a question that combines a couple of topics. When discussing your growth and particularly the return to shareholders, which is quite significant for investors these days, I'm curious about your operational strategy. Specifically, regarding the Utica and Midcon, are you planning to operate one rig in each area? My question is how you balance running the most efficient operations with maximizing shareholder returns.

That's an excellent question. I mentioned it in my initial remarks. Currently, we have a program that was created based on very low gas prices, aimed at maximizing cash flow and ultimately returning value to shareholders through budget improvements. This situation provides us with the chance to explore a more efficient development strategy. For example, in both the Utica and the SCOOP, we sometimes pause drilling and then switch to fracking, which can be quite inefficient. Given the current market conditions, where supply costs are rising and services are challenging to secure, this approach introduces risks. Therefore, we are considering the possibility of implementing a more consistent program, which is part of the reason we haven't provided formal guidance. We'll discuss this further as a board. From our operational perspective, we certainly prefer a more consistent approach. So, I appreciate your question.

And then, it just really got to where I wanted to go. And just on the follow-up, now with the shareholder repurchase authorization, how do you sort of blend that in thinking about pushing even for Bill? How do you think about that in comparison to the dividends?

Yes. I think, Neal, I'll take it first. I mean, the good news is going to a more consistent program does not cost a lot; it's probably a 20% to 25% increase in the program. And so, in the Utica, for instance, require three months. You fill that in, you stay on the same fracking schedule, you frac another pad. It's not like you're doubling up at all. So I think you can increase and still generate substantial cash flow. And if you think about right now $350 million is pretty attractive price. That number, obviously, if prices stay higher, will go higher; you still have a lot of headroom for dividend, shareholder buyback, and paying down debt, which is just extremely important to take us down to at least one-times leveraged. So I think there's room for all of that. We just want to make sure we're very measured in our decision-making, I think. And we don't move to that too quickly. But I do think it's something it could be a positive thing. And also, by doing that, although we wouldn't see much of an increase in 2022 on production, we could see a more substantial increase in production in 2023 if prices sustain. So I think we’ve got, I think there's plenty of room to consider this without worrying about do we have to do one or the other. Anything to add, Bill?

I don’t believe that’s entirely accurate. We plan to approach this carefully, and there is flexibility. These options are not mutually exclusive. We recently amended the credit facility, and our board and management are actively discussing capital returns. We will continue these discussions, and we are capable of pursuing multiple initiatives as we look ahead.

No, I love the optionality. Thanks guys so much.

Yeah. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Zach Parham with JPMorgan. You may proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I guess first off, on the Angelo pad, your well cost came in a bit below the Utica target. Could you talk a little bit about how you see well cost trending in 2022, given both the cost inflation pressures, but also positive trends on the upside, including simul-fracked and doing things more efficiently?

Yes. I think right now we're kind of offsetting each other. We’re seeing, obviously, everybody’s different numbers, they're talking about inflation, but on any particular service or commodity, we’re seeing 0% to 40% change. So, on a blended basis, it may be 10% to 15% pressure. So we're trying to basically hold our own and offset. I do think there are opportunities below the 750. But those things could get offset by inflationary effects. We don't have a big water disposal system, for instance, in the Utica. So we have big pads, and we're not fracking next door to use that water. It doesn't cost a lot. So it can be a little bit lumpy. And that's why we're considering going to more consistent programs. So we are fracking more wells while we're producing these new pads to try and have a better place for disposal of the water through the fracking operation. So I don't want to get ahead of our Series as far as predicting where we'll be next year. But I do think the range around 300, if we stay with the same program is good, because we are going to be able to offset some of those inflationary effects. But I wouldn't be prepared yet to quote what we're thinking we'll see on a $1 per foot basis yet.

Thanks for that color. Just one follow-up for me. One of your natural gas-focus peers recently announced restructuring some of their hedge book; is this something Gulfport could potentially look at something to do on some of your longer-dated hedges that were put in place in a very different gas price market? And maybe if you could talk about, if so what that potentially could look like?

Yes, Bill, take that.

Yes. So yes, definitely, that was another reason we did – we did the credit facility. We needed to get some more counterparties to allow us to work on some of that, until a bit early to tell you exactly how that's going to play out. But it's something we're focused on, specifically the calls in 2023. And again, next quarter, we should have a better update on that, but it's definitely something we are focused on. Now, again, part of the reason for the credit facility amendment was to allow us to address some of that.

Thank you, guys. That's all for me.

All right. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Tarek Hamid with JPMorgan. You may proceed with your question.

Good morning, and thanks for taking my question. You certainly kept guidance online and capital sort of flat at that go-forward plan at that 1 Bcf and $300 million of capital since emergence. I guess, and this sort of follows on Neal and Zach's questions, but given the productivity of the Angelo pad and just the broader drilling program so far this year, do you think there's upside to volume in 2022? I guess, how do you think about your productivity assumptions on a go-forward basis?

Yes, I believe we are quite close to our goals. The 1 Bcf target remains a solid estimate. We had anticipated these production rates, and everything we've implemented this year is performing as expected. Our standard operations are meeting our expectations. Therefore, we have limited capacity to speed things up. The permitting process in the Utica takes a considerable amount of time, restricting our flexibility to advance our plans. While we could potentially bring a pad online earlier in the year, that production would still commence late in the year, so we shouldn't anticipate significant increases. The current level aligns with our plans for 2023, and while we have more flexibility for the future, our projections primarily hover around the 1 Bcf mark.

I appreciate it. And just one follow-up for me. Just on the timing on the execution of the share repurchase program. How could you expect to start to execute on the program? I think you should point out pretty successfully in the slide deck you're going to generate a ton of cash in 2022. You could be out of pre-payable debt period in just a quarter or two. So, I guess, how do you think about timing to start to tip your hand on that share purchases?

Yes, that's a good question. While it's not advantageous for us to disclose exactly what will be available on the market, we will approach it opportunistically. We believe our shares are undervalued, making it a worthwhile investment. However, we won't reveal any specifics just yet, but it's definitely something we're considering and are excited about.

Got it. Well, thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Steven Dechert with KeyBanc. You may proceed with your question.

Hey, guys, I just want for me. I just wanted to see if you guys have given any consideration to raise the gas production this winter with the high prices right now? Thanks.

Yes. We don't have many chances to do that. If you examine the slide deck closely, you'll notice that the Shannon and Hendershot wells have been stable for about eight months. About a month ago, we increased the output of those wells for a time. Some wells have seen increased production, while a few have reduced output. We're testing what we can achieve without causing operational issues related to frac sand formations. Our target production rate for the Angelo pads is 235, but we're currently pushing that to 250. Due to some downtime, we would stick with the 235 target. So, don't expect to see a lot of changes. We've been working on compression projects, which you can see in the base decline and the decline of our new wells in the SCOOP, to minimize the decline. We expedited the Angelo pad launch and it started a bit early. However, we don't have unlimited capacity to ramp up production, and we need to operate safely to avoid losing any significant wells. We're proceeding cautiously while trying to maximize our production given the prices, and we understand your question. The guidance range we mentioned in the deck is what you should anticipate for the fourth quarter.

Got it. Okay, great. Thanks.

At this time, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. Now, I turn the floor back over to Tim Cutt for closing remarks.

All right. Thanks very much. And thanks for calling in and asking the questions and also calling in to listen; we appreciate that. I mainly want to say once again, thanks to our organization, our employees, our contractors, who actually did a lot since the beginning of this year, and you've delivered against very well, and we do appreciate that a lot. Again, appreciate your time today to join in. And if you have any additional questions, don't hesitate to call, Tommy, and reach out to our Investor Relations team. So, with that, that concludes the call. Thank you.