Thank you and welcome, everyone, to Keysight's First Quarter Earnings Conference Call for Fiscal Year 2021. Joining me are Ron Nersesian, Keysight's Chairman, President and CEO; and Neil Doherty, our CFO. Joining us in the Q&A session will be Satish Dhanasekaran, Chief Operating Officer and Mark Wallace, Senior Vice President of Global Sales. You will find a press release and information to supplement today's discussion on our website on investor.keysight.com. While there, please click on the link for quarterly reports under the Financial Information tab. There you will find an investor presentation along with Keysight segment results. Following this conference call, we will post a copy of the prepared remarks to the website. Today's comments by Ron and Neil will refer to non-GAAP financial measures. We will also make references to core growth, which excludes the impact of currency movements and acquisitions or divestitures completed within the last 12 months. You will find the most directly comparable GAAP financial metrics and reconciliations on our website. All comparisons are on a year-over-year basis unless specifically noted otherwise. We will make forward-looking statements about the financial performance of the company on today's call. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are only valid as of today. The company assumes no obligation to update them. Please review the company's recent SEC filings for a more complete picture of our risks and other factors. Lastly, I would note that management is scheduled to participate in upcoming virtual investor conferences in March, hosted by Susquehanna, Credit Suisse and UBS. And now I will turn the call over to Ron.

Thank you, Jason, and thank you, everyone, for joining us. Keysight delivered another outstanding quarter. Our consistent performance illustrates the strength of our differentiated solutions, broad-based momentum across diverse end markets and the durability of our business model. Today, I'll focus my comments on three key headlines. First, we achieved record first quarter orders driven by growth across all regions despite China trade headwinds. Second, strong execution by the Keysight team delivered revenue and earnings growth above guidance. And third, we entered the year with solid momentum across multiple end markets and confidence in our revenue and earnings growth trajectory for the year. Despite our short-term expectation of elevated expenses from variable compensation, which is due to the high near-term revenue growth, we expect to achieve mid to high teens earnings growth in Fiscal 2021. Now let's take a deeper look into our first quarter results. We delivered record first quarter orders of $1.2 billion, which again exceeded revenue and grew 7%. First quarter revenue grew 8% to $1.2 billion. As previously discussed, we faced strong year-over-year headwinds in the first quarter due to China trade restrictions; adjusting for this impact, both orders and revenue grew solid double digits. We continue to make strong progress towards our long-term financial targets with consistent execution enabled by the strengthened discipline of the Keysight leadership model. We delivered first quarter gross margin of 64%, operating margin at 27%, which increased 210 basis points and free cash flow of $267 million. Turning to our markets, aerospace, defense and government achieved record first quarter orders and revenue; 20% revenue growth was driven by continued investment in electromagnetic spectrum operations, space and the new commercial technologies like 5G and early 6G research. In commercial communications, we achieved all-time record orders in total, as well as for 5G, while revenue declined 3%. Adjusting to the transient impact of unfavorable trade restrictions, commercial communications orders grew double digits and revenue grew high single digits. Strength was driven by ongoing global 5G deployments and the rollout of new 5G devices and continued investment in 400G and 800G Ethernet for data centers. Keysight's end-to-end solutions portfolio is enabling the rapid progression of new technologies, both in the wireless and wired systems of the communications network, where our value proposition remains strong. Keysight continues to lead the industry in 5G powered by years of close collaboration with market makers in standards bodies. We are advancing our 5G strategy to capture emerging opportunities in the application layer as momentum builds ahead of deployments in 2021. We made great progress this quarter as broad industries embrace our 5G platform and new applications emerge. For example, O-RAN continues to be an area of active investment for our customers. We recently introduced a suite of end-to-end solutions for O-RAN vendors and mobile operators. Our solutions are used to verify the interoperability, performance, conformance, and security of multi-vendor 5G networks. We also announced strategic partnerships in the expanding O-RAN space with industry leaders like Xilinx, Radisys, ArrayComm and Altiostar. In addition, we continue to accelerate Keysight's capabilities to provide industry-leading solutions through strategic acquisitions. In Q1, we acquired a leader in wireless test and measurement solutions for protocol decoding and interoperability. This acquisition complements our end-to-end solutions portfolio, providing problem-solving tools that extend from inside the wireless network, out through over-the-air analytics. Record revenue for the Electronic Industrial Solutions Group was driven by double-digit growth in semiconductors and general electronic solutions. Record semiconductor revenue was fueled by ongoing investment in next-generation process technologies, bolstered by new customer wins in China as we successfully redeployed our salesforce to capitalize on new opportunities. General electronic strength reflected continued economic recovery with growth across all regions and improvement in the advanced research education market. In automotive, despite ongoing macro challenges, end demand is stabilizing as strategic investments in advanced technologies have accelerated in Asia and in the Americas. In Europe, we continue to expand our presence and recently announced a collaboration with ElringKlinger, one of the world's leading Cisco partners to the automotive industry. They chose Keysight's battery test solution to advance e-mobility in the field of battery development for electric vehicles. Software and services each delivered double-digit order and revenue growth. Combined, they were approximately one-third of total Keysight revenue contributing significantly to our software-centric solution strategy and differentiation and further strengthen the durability of our business model with increasing recurring revenue. In summary, I'd like to thank our Keysight employees around the world who have reacted dynamically to a challenging environment to deliver exceptional results for our customers and shareholders. We are pleased with our first quarter performance and encouraged by the broad-based momentum across our markets entering the year. Now, I would like to turn it over to Neil to discuss our financial performance and outlook in more detail.

Thank you, Ron, and hello, everyone. As Ron mentioned, the Keysight team delivered an outstanding first quarter as continued economic recovery drove a steady improvement in demand across all major regions. First Quarter revenue of $1,180 billion was above the high end of our guidance range and grew 8% or 6% on a core basis. Q1 revenue growth was driven by broad strength across multiple end markets and geographies. Total Keysight orders again exceeded revenue in Q1 with a book-to-build just over one. We achieved first quarter orders of $1,223 billion, up 7% or 5% on a core basis, successfully overcoming increased trade restrictions. Turning to operational results for Q1. Reported gross margin of 64% and operating expenses of $439 million were well-managed, resulting in an operating margin of 27%, an increase of 210 basis points year-over-year. We achieved net income of $270 million and delivered $1.43 in earnings per share, which is well above the high end of our guidance. Our weighted average share count for the quarter was 188 million shares. Moving to the performance of our segments. Our Communication Solutions Group generated record first quarter revenue of $852 million, up 4%, delivering gross margin of 65% and operating margin of 26%. In Q1, commercial communications achieved all-time record total and 5G quarterly orders. First Quarter revenue declined 3% to $558 million, with commercial communications disproportionately impacted by the China trade restrictions. Aerospace, defense and government achieved record first quarter revenue of $294 million, an increase of 20% versus a strong compare in Q1 last year. Growth was driven by robust year-end spending across all major regions. In the U.S., growth was driven by prime contractor spending, offsetting slightly lower spending from direct government customers as we saw less than expected disruption from the U.S. administration transition. The Electronic Industrial Solutions Group generated record revenue of $328 million, an increase of 18% or 13% on a core basis. Orders in revenue for our semiconductor and general electronics measurement solutions broke through double digits for the second quarter in a row, with strong revenue growth across all regions, particularly in Asia Pacific. EISD reported gross margin of 63% and operating margin of 29%. Moving to the balance sheet and cash flow. We ended our first quarter with $1.9 billion in cash and cash equivalents and reported cash flow from operations of $295 million and free cash flow of $267 million, or 23% of revenue. Under a share repurchase authorization during the quarter, we acquired approximately 137,000 shares on the open market at an average price of $145.14 for a total consideration of $20 million. Before moving to our guidance, I'd like to remind everyone of my comments last quarter in which I stated that flexible spending and variable compensation are expected to increase in FY 2021, with Q2 expenses seasonally higher than all other quarters. The principal driver is variable compensation, which is a function of organic revenue growth and operating margin. Just as we flexed expenses down last year in response to a decline in revenue, we will flex up this year, particularly in quarters with soft revenue comps, notably Q2 and Q3. We believe our variable compensation is an important element of not only our flexible cost structure, but our human capital philosophy, in which employees are engaged and participate in both the ups and downs of the business. Now, turning to our outlook and guidance. We expect second quarter 2021 revenue to be in the range of $1,190 billion to $1,210 billion, which represents 34% revenue growth at the midpoint. We expect Q2 earnings per share to be in the range of $1.29 to $1.35 based on a weighted diluted share count of approximately 188 million shares. In closing, we're entering the year with order momentum, a solid backlog position and strong operational execution. We are pleased with the trajectory of our business and expect to achieve mid to high teens earnings growth for the full fiscal year. With that, I will now turn it back to Jason for the Q&A.

Thank you, Neil. Sideris, will you please give the instructions for the Q&A?

Yes. And your first question comes from the line of Rick Eastman with Baird.

Yes, good afternoon. Could you perhaps maybe just kind of walk through a little bit of the operating leverage that we really saw in both Commercial Communication Solutions Group? But I'm kind of looking at the out profit number of 170. Is that with the gross margin maybe down? Is that primarily all mix or maybe give us a little bit of a feel for that. And maybe the same question around EISG. Just significant operating leverage there. I'm curious how much of this mix versus volume. That's a new word for it?

Yes, Rick, this is Neil. I believe you are right. The fourth quarter was very favorable; when looking sequentially, it was a strong quarter for our gross margin as we significantly increased production following the COVID disruptions in the second and third quarters. Our response to immediate customer demand for urgent deliveries also positively influenced the mix in the fourth quarter. In the first quarter, we observed a return to a more normalized mix, which aligns with the quarters leading up to the fourth quarter, along with slightly lower volume. This observation is generally applicable to both the Communications Group and EISG, with no specific issues in either business.

And you also look at the long-term model that we outlined at analysts day for FY 2023, obviously, our performance shows very strong against that and we have no doubt that we'll be able to deliver to that level going forward.

I'm surprised to see the order growth, and it seems like you've maintained your backlog around 20% year-over-year. My quick math suggests it's 23% year-over-year on the backlog side. I know you've indicated that orders are strong across different geographies and product lines. Could you highlight any specific area, whether it's a geography or between the two business segments, where you were particularly pleased with your order growth this quarter?

I'll mention a couple of points, and then I'll let Mark provide more detail. First, regarding China, our orders were down 6%, but we anticipated a larger decline due to the impact of the trade restrictions involving Huawei. Excluding Huawei, we saw a 19% growth in orders from our other Chinese customers. As Huawei falls out of the comparison period, we're very pleased with this performance. Our Chinese sales team was quickly reassigned from accounts where they couldn't sell to other accounts in the region, and we executed this almost immediately, which contributed to our results. That was significant. Additionally, both India and Japan demonstrated strong performance, with orders well into double digits, and Europe also achieved double-digit growth. Mark, would you like to add some more regional insights?

Sure. Ron covered it really well, Rick, but I would just add that about half our growth in China overcoming the headwinds was from new customers. Again, demonstrating how we're executing and rotating to both new opportunities and new customers and we want additional business with our existing customers, whether that be around 5G to some of the long tail of customers, 400-gigabit Tier 2 customers. And I was very pleased with semiconductor, very strong growth again, both from existing large customers, as well as acquiring two new fabulous semiconductor customers in the quarter in China. Very strong results in Japan for 5G and aerospace defense. And then if you look at Europe, it really was a story of this very broad demand across multiple end markets. We had growth across most of our countries across Europe. And it really goes to show the strength of our portfolio and the depth of our penetration into all these end markets.

Let me add just a couple more comments, Rick. One, our general electronics business was up in orders over 20% and that's a really good sign. That talks about the macro environment in the industrial markets. So, we're very pleased to see that and also our overall corporate strategy and moving to more software-centric solutions, which requires more software and more services. Both software and services grew double digits in orders again this quarter.

Very good. Congrats. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Jim Suva from Citigroup Investment. Your line is open.

Thank you very much, and really good job on the results in an unclear uncertain environment. My question is a little bit more, just to help us out looking forward. Not so much on the trade and tariff stuff, but recently the supply chain with the freezing in Texas and chip shortages, can you talk to us a little bit about do you have some buffer chips that you're okay for the next three to six months? Or are you tempering your outlook a little bit? I'm just kind of a little bit concerned about the procurement cycle. Seems to have this additional variable. And then my second question is on OpEx. How should we be thinking about that as hopefully COVID becomes behind us at some point? Thank you so much.

Sure, I will discuss the procurement aspect, and then I will hand it over to Neil to elaborate on the ongoing OpEx formula. Regarding procurement, we have considered the extended lead times from semiconductor suppliers as well as other global environmental factors. We have provided guidance for the midpoint, which is set at $1.2 billion for the upcoming quarter, factoring in the semiconductor cycles. However, we are optimistic that situations won’t deteriorate due to COVID, and we are confident in our ability to maintain this guidance, which is higher than street consensus for the next quarter.

Yes, Jim, regarding your second question about OpEx, I mentioned in my prepared remarks that our underlying investment levels are stable and are expected to remain stable moving forward. However, we anticipate some short-term increases over the next couple of quarters, with the most significant factor being our variable pay program. As I noted last quarter, Q2 expenses are expected to be seasonally higher than in other quarters this year, primarily due to the rebound in variable compensation compared to last year. This variable compensation depends on both organic revenue growth and operating margin, and in quarters where we experience softer revenue comparisons and thus higher revenue growth, like we will see in Q2 and Q3 this year, our variable compensation will be significantly elevated. We have forecasted strong revenue growth of 34% in Q2, which will lead to sequential increases in our variable compensation program of more than $30 million compared to Q1. Since all of our non-executive employees are part of this variable pay program, the increase will be distributed roughly equally among cost of sales, R&D, and SG&A, specifically affecting the OpEx lines you mentioned. It’s also important to emphasize that the underlying investment level is stable, and after Q3, both our variable pay and expense levels should return to more typical levels.

Thank you, and congratulations again, to you and your team. Thank you.

Thanks, Jim. And just to finish that up, if you take a look at our overall model, we think it's a short-term effect, and that's why for one of the few times we've guided out for the whole year producing EPS growth in the teens as we had mentioned in our prepared remarks.

Your next question comes from the line of John Marchetti with Stifel. Your line is open.

Thanks very much. I was wondering if you could just take a moment and talk about some of the strength that you continue to see in 5G? How much of that maybe is coming from new customers, as you sort of hinted at in the comment about the older strength? And how much of it is maybe moving into different variants of 5G? Whether it's standalone versus non, or Millimeter Wave versus sub-6G?

Satish, feel free to answer this question.

Yes, I'll take that, Ron. I think one of the effects in 5G that we're seeing as deployments scale is the broader interest in deploying this technology across different end market verticals. And that as a result of expanding the ecosystem, as we have talked about this quarter, we added over 100 new customers to our 5G platform. So that's that continues to be strong. At the highest level, I think we've stated its growth across all regions, for 5G and all parts of the ecosystem. So, it is broad and we see sort of four themes. Right? You look at the R&D investment cycle, there's new themes such as Open RAN that are capturing interest, manufacturing opportunities, scaling as 5G deploys, and it's profitable manufacturing as we have discussed as select manufacturing strategy. And there is the interest in this technology from new verticals such as aerospace, defense, automotive, and industrial. And finally, we see this long term steady push to commercialize Millimeter Wave as we've talked about as a long-term dynamic for our business, which has got an upgrade pattern and to feed this momentum, we've just announced over 30 new product introductions this quarter and we feel confident about the projections based on everything we see in the industry.

And maybe just as a follow up there, Satish, you guys have mentioned in the past, you think this market sort of peaked out in 2022 or 2023 for you. I'm curious if that's still the case, or if you think with some of these newer things coming on, that actually extends it out a little bit?

Yes, I think based on what we have seen in the past, I think we've sort of seen an industry CapEx projected to peak due to the Millimeter Wave parts of 5G being deployed. However, for our business in communications, we have a broad portfolio of both wired and wireless and the end-to-end portfolio that we have created, not only has sort of a poor incident effect, but as Ron referenced, higher software content, higher services, so we're much more plugged in and able to monetize the lifecycle value from our early lead.

Hi, this is Joker on for Samik. So my first question is just around aerospace, and electronic industrial business again. Obviously, you had two great quarters of execution in a row. I guess how should we think of the sustainability of the momentum in both those segments? And what is driving your content?

Ron, should I take…

Sure.

As far as aerospace and defense is concerned, I'm very pleased with record orders and record revenues. As we mentioned before, the strength is coming across all the regions, tracking the COVID recovery or macro recovery. And that's probably a common dynamic between our aerospace, defense business and the general electronics business in our industrial segment. Specifically, on the aerospace defense, our portfolio focus is on defense modernization, in particular around these new teams continue to position us well. The passage of the NDAA or the budget in the United States in December, we feel cautiously optimistic about the outlook for that business as we look forward. And we also have a pretty healthy backlog into the business. So, we continue to expect strong growth in the next couple of quarters. As far as the EISG business is concerned, again, broad strength from our general electronics business, but also semiconductor where we're seeing increased investments driven by the advanced nodes and the China IC investment that Mark referenced earlier.

Got it.

I would also comment that different form factors are contributing to that such as our modular solutions had a very strong quarter, as well as software and services that have been mentioned earlier, all play into this general electronics market and the overall EISG market.

I appreciate the color. And then just a quick follow up. You guys kind of went into detail about the 5G and the momentum that you're seeing there. I'm just curious, can we get an update on how you're seeing the declines play out on the 4G side? I know last year, because of COVID, there was obviously a big impact there, but are we seeing declines starting to moderate on the 4G side?

Yes, sequentially 4G has been flat quarter-over-quarter for us and we're very pleased with the uptake in 5G as I referenced. It was a record quarter and if you include 5G and 4G together, we've grown at year-over-year and sequentially quarter-over-quarter. We feel good about the portfolio and I did mention that we've launched 30 new products this quarter to feed that momentum in the market.

Got it. Appreciate the color, guys. Congrats on the results.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Mehdi Hosseini with SIG. Your line is open.

Yes. Thanks for taking the question. One follow with Satish. Can you please help me understand the mix of 400-gig and 800-gig ethernet as a mixer for overall communication sector group? And how do you see that trending especially as the volume brand for 400-gig plays out in the second half? And for Neil, it would be great if you could give us some reference. I think there was a mention of software and services accounting for one-third of the revenue. Can you give us a qualitative or quantitative assessment of what the mix of software is? Where was it a year ago? And how should we be thinking about the software mix looking forward?

Yes, I'll maybe start with the 400-gig question, Mehdi. As we have really done very well with the wireline technology evolutions over the number of years and last year was a pretty strong year for 400-gig, I think we've referenced it on calls. And what we saw this quarter was a broader adoption of 400-gig technologies, still heavily driven by data center demand, which is adapting, I should say, the 400-gig at scale. We saw increased spend from Tier 2 and long-tail customers in Asia in particular and we expect as the 400-gig economies of scale and maturity occur, that more of that demand will start to shift in the telco or Metro opportunities. So, we're still on the frontend of that. I would also say that on 800-gig, the investments are in early R&D, which we expect to play out in production in 18 to 24 months. So, we're engaged early. Just this quarter, we announced the full suite of R&D offerings for 800-gig as well, which positions us well to benefit from not only the wireless on the 5G side, but also from the wireline opportunities in our commercial communications business.

Just in terms of the relative size of software, we've said previously that software is approximately 20% of total revenues. And as Satish has mentioned, it continues to outgrow the broader business, growing double digits again this quarter. So that mix is increasing slowly over time and we expect that it will continue to do so as we continue this migration towards more complete solutions with higher software content.

If I may, just a quick follow up for Neil here. If you execute and deliver the software growth above the top line, could that be potentially a source of gross margin upside that could potentially drive EPS growth this year towards the mid to high teens?

Certainly, over the long run, we see increasing software content as a driver of gross margin. I think you've seen that over the past couple of years as we've added software to our portfolio, as well as taking other actions to drive our gross margins northward. You know, the mix shift, it's not dramatic. It's slow and steady over time. So, hard for me to draw a direct link between a mixed shift over the next couple of quarters and immediate EPS increases; there's a lot of things that are going to go into determining that level over the course of the next several quarters. But generally speaking, yes, our software growth is absolutely contributing to our gross margin improvement over time.

Thank you.

Well also, so if you're looking for the short term, or big orders, where to go ahead and where to exceed our projections, when you take a look at our incrementals, we have delivered to our model and then some pretty much consistently over the last five years. And we expect to continue to do so. Yes. And I was just trying to understand how conservative is that method, high-teen EPS growth? And how should we think about upsides from there?

I think you can see in our guide that we're very encouraged by the market and our performance in the business on the top line. We do have some short-term expense pressures over a couple of quarters that will put some pressure on EPS relative to normal incrementals, over the quarter or where the incrementals would otherwise have been over the course of the next several quarters. But by Q4, we're kind of lapping those comps and the impact that they have on our business where we return to more normalized levels.

Okay, thanks, guys.

Your next question comes Mark Delaney with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Yes. Good afternoon, and thanks for taking the question. I was hoping to dig more into the full year EPS growth commentary of mid to high teens in recognizing the very good or that the company just reported for the quarter. If my math is right, the implied second half EPS growth is relatively flattish to slightly higher year-over-year, 5% or 10% or so. And yes, I understand the higher variable comp, which makes a lot of sense and is good news. But is there anything else besides the variable comp that you're trying to factor into the implied EPS growth guidance that you're discussing today? Thanks.

The only thing I mentioned earlier is that our Q4 gross margins in last year were extraordinarily favorable. Right? Not only do we have the highest revenue quarter we'd had by a pretty significant margin, we had significantly higher gross margins than we'd ever had previously. So, we are going to have a tough year-over-year compare in the fourth quarter that is going to factor into that ultimate equation as well.

That's helpful and makes sense. My question was on the 5G order strength and the strength that the companies have seen within Millimeter Wave. Can you describe to what extent you're seeing some increased adoption of Millimeter Wave in different geographies and perhaps the opportunity for Millimeter Wave deployments to help your business in China? Thank you.

Yes, thank you. I think as we have referenced before, the Millimeter Wave opportunity is a long-term one for us. We see a very steady increase in interest from our customers. At this point, heavily driven by the U.S. bans. You can think of 20 gigahertz to 40 gigahertz sort of spectrum. And with new spectrum coming online, the 66 gigahertz to 90 gigahertz range, I think that tends to sow the seeds for the runway. We're talking about China's 2022 Winter Olympics, and we expect it to be a push with a showcase of Millimeter Wave. So those are clearly drivers. And then if you look even further out, you start thinking about some early research occurring in the terahertz space. So, again, this is a very long-term opportunity. Keysight's got a competitive differentiation. We have talked about this and we're well-positioned to address this. Currently, we're working with customers to solve some critical challenges in commercializing Millimeter Wave like in advanced beam management, peak higher data rates, 10 gigabits per second and above. It's a long term dynamic and we are well-positioned there.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Long from Barclays. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. This is Peter on for Tim. Congratulations on the results. On CSG, just again, as we see the 400G cycle coming closer, could you help us parse out what that has meant for you between your wireline hardware business versus the network invisibility side and the essence of what inning we are in that cycle from that testing measurement perspective? And then also on A&D. How should we think about what this very strong Q1 here implies for Q2 seasonality out? Just going off this very strong pace?

Yes. I'll take the aerospace, defense first. Again, record orders, and given the comps from the favorable comms we have for the next couple of quarters. We expect strong revenue performance in the business and our focus areas around defense modernization are also aligned with some of the strategic priorities of the governments around the world. So we feel good about where we are in the business. With regard to your question on wireline, the entire portfolio of wireline involves the focus in three areas if you think of it. The focus on high-speed evolutions, 400-gig, 800-gig, terahertz and terabit ethernet and beyond. And security as a second theme, which is gaining customer interest. And the third area is on visibility. Clearly, we're the drivers for the business right now, are 400-gig and 800-gig. In terms of the visibility business, we expect or we're everything we hear and we see the pipeline building towards is a recovery in enterprise IT spending which would be a good peg. And that to occur as folks return back to work or in a hybrid mode later on in the year. So that's probably a driver for that part of the business. But overall, we're pleased with the synergies we're seeing and you see that reflected in the strength of our commercial communications business this quarter.

Great, thank you for the color.

Your next question comes from the line of David Ridley-Lane from Bank of America. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good evening. Since you've done the math on the impacts from trade restrictions on both orders and revenue, what was the estimated headwind for both of those?

It was roughly six to seven points at the Keysight level. Obviously, it was heavily skewed to CSG, specifically to commercial communications. So, I think if you get to the commercial communications level, it was a double-digit headwind for the commercial communications business.

Got it.

Putting the record orders for commercial communications into context, we were extraordinarily pleased with that result given the China trade headwinds on that business.

Got it? Okay. And then, since no one else has picked up on it, I'll ask. Can you tell us a little bit more on the acquisition that you closed? I think it was about $100 million or so from cash flow revenue. How it fits into the portfolio? And it seems like it's in a very fast-growing part of the market. So kind of what's your near-term revenue expectations as well?

Yes, I can start by saying that it's a smaller acquisition. It's estimated to contribute roughly half a percentage point to Keysight's revenue, and it's highly profitable. This aligns with our M&A strategy of focusing on software-centric product categories, and importantly, it helps us complete the customer workflow. It plays a role in the interoperability testing space, allowing customers to resolve complex system issues. With the scale of 5G deployments and new trends like Open RAN, we believe this acquisition will enhance our momentum in the commercial communications business.

Got it. And then last one for me. You're now in a net cash position. How do you think about Keysight's ability to be more aggressive on share repurchase? Is being in a net cash position aligned for you?

Go ahead, I'm sorry.

Yes, our first objective, obviously, is to grow the business and provide a great return above our cost of capital. So we continue to look for M&A opportunities that can further our strategy. But again, if we can't go ahead and produce, you know, an hourly return, we're not going to spend it. So you can see we're very deliberate and focused, and we will not go ahead and go after things that are too speculative. So that is our first priority. The second thing, if we had excess funds, at the end of the day, we would rather do that through opportunistic share repurchases. As you saw, not this quarter, but as you saw in Q4, where the average price was below $100 in the shares that we did repurchase. And then third would be to do something like a dividend that we're far from that at this point. But still, first, we're going ahead and making sure after organic growth is funded through over $700 million in R&D. Second, is to look for M&A that could go ahead and enhance our growth and produce a higher return on invested capital. Third, clearly is to look for opportunistic share buybacks, which we have done and we plan to make sure we're at least anti-dilutive, like we've stated before, but we will get a little bit more aggressive if we see a very big opportunity.

Your next question comes from a line of Adam Thalhimer from Thomas Davis. Your line is open.

Close enough. Hi, guys. Great quarter.

Thanks, Adam.

Thanks, Adam.

Shoot, this might be a waste of a question, but I got to ask about the Biden administration and Huawei. There have been some early indications that maybe some of their restrictions get eased. I'm just curious if you have any thoughts on that?

Well, we don't have any particular insight as to what the Biden administration will do. But I'm very pleased that we were concerned about having to have that in our compare and to go ahead and seeing what that would do to our top line when we had to go ahead and stop selling, according to the government laws. And I'm very, very pleased that we reported double-digit quarter growth and revenue growth outside at our other accounts in order to basically smooth right over that. So, if things were to change at Huawei or with any other government restrictions, that would certainly be significant upside for us.

Okay, thank you.

Thanks, Adam.

Your next question comes from a line of Chris Snyder from UBS. Your line is open.

Thank you. So, just following up on the capital allocation. The company finished the quarter with $1.9 billion of cash, which is certainly well above historical levels. What do you view to be the optimal level of cash to keep on hand? And is there a willingness to go after larger acquisition targets? Because while there's been a steady stream of bolt-on type acquisitions, it feels like that is a little bit difficult to kind of right-size the cash balance with these just bolt-ons alone?

Sure, well, I'll just say this, that we have looked at over 300 different acquisitions. And again, we're very selective. We've made about a dozen at this point, and you're right, most of them have been smaller, except for two of them. And we continue to look for large and small things that fit into our strategy. But there is a very high hurdle for the large acquisitions, obviously, the upside, is much more significant. But when you look at the premium and the amount of dollars that you have to make up in the premium you pay for a company, we want to make sure that pays off for the shareholders. We have more cash than we need to run the company right now. But we are aggressively looking at M&A and unfortunately, we can't share much more than that. Neil, you may have something else you want to add?

Yes, I want to mention that while we currently hold more cash than necessary, determining the ideal cash level is a complex matter that can change over time. We are focused on utilizing that cash effectively, either through strategic mergers and acquisitions that add value or by finding favorable ways to return it, similar to what we accomplished in the fourth quarter of last year. We will keep pursuing these options.

Thank you for that. And then just for the second question, can you talk about the pricing environment, both for CSG and EISG? And what level of positive pricing, if any, is baked into the company's mid-single digit long term core growth targets?

We always look at pricing depending on what's going on in the market and how much our differentiation is in a particular segment. So clearly, if there's a lot of competition, we don't have differentiation that it's that great, we cannot go ahead and utilize too much pricing power. But what we're doing in 5G is certainly unique. We're on the leadership end and not only in different products, but when you look across the workflow and we look for opportunities to do so but we're not going to gouge our customers. We want to make sure that we have a good long-term environment and they stick with us. So, we review our pricing at a minimum twice a year and we look for opportunities for price increases and we will continue to do so to drive our margins higher or to offset inflation. But as far as what the amount is, that's something that we do not state publicly.

Thank you.

Thanks, Chris.

Your next question comes from the line of Brandon Couillard from Jefferies. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks. Good afternoon. Most of my questions have been covered. But, Ron, I don't think you mentioned any call on the auto market specifically yet. Curious, latest thoughts there? And if there has been kind of any turn perhaps in the order trends in that market? Thanks.

Yes. Well, I'll let Satish answer this. We've been focusing certainly on the battery test and the overall infrastructure for EV. We have mentioned a nice win that we had in the prepared remarks earlier, and we continue to be in good position in that space. Also, as we look at autonomous vehicles, it's the same thing. But as far as the market, we've seen the market a little bit more depressed, as we all know, in auto and I'll let Satish get a chance to comment on where he sees that going.

Yes. And thanks, Ron. We're seeing signs of slow recovery in the auto market. The business is definitely stabilizing; the manufacturing parts of the business have depressed a strong reference. But there is a steady focus on next-gen R&D with AV and EV applications. Definitely the push around the world for more electrification, we view as a long-term opportunity and we're focused on creating value to help extend the ranges, help with interoperability needs by implementing global standards, including in China and focusing on bidirectional charging applications. With 5G in particular, we have a differentiated position on C-V2X technology that we're continuing to progress. So, this may be a market where as the auto end market recovers, we start to see even bigger traction, especially in EV and AV. That's our expectation, but our portfolio is strong and we continue to be engaged with customers.

Thanks. And, Neil, would you remind us just what the China trade headwind is on a year-over-year basis to the top line in the second quarter? That a similar sort of 6% to 7%?

Yes, what we said before was that it was 5% on the half, obviously skewed towards Q1. We've just told you Q1 was 6%, so Q2 is in the 3% to 4%-ish range.

Got you. Thank you.

Thank you. That concludes our question-and-answer session for today. I would now like to turn the conference back to Jason Kary for any closing comments.

Hi. Thanks, Sedaris. No further comments. I just like to thank everyone for joining us today and wish you all a great day.

This concludes our conference call. You may now disconnect.