Good day. Thank you for being here. Welcome to the Third Quarter Louisiana Pacific Corporation Earnings Conference Call. I would now like to turn the call over to Aaron Howald, Vice President of Investor Relations and Business Development. Please continue.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining us to discuss LP's results for the third quarter of 2022 as well as our updated outlook for the fourth quarter and full year. As the operator said, my name is Aaron Howald, and I'm LP's Vice President of Investor Relations and Business Development. I'm joined this morning by Brad Southern, LP's Chief Executive Officer; and Alan Haughie, LP's Chief Financial Officer. During this morning's conference call and webcast we will refer to an accompanying presentation that is available on LP’s IR webpage, which is investor.lpcorp.com. Our 8-K filing is also available there along with our earnings press release and various other materials. Statements regarding non-GAAP financial metrics and forward-looking statements are available on Slides 2 and 3 of the earnings presentation. And the appendix also contains reconciliations that are further supplemented by this morning's 8-K filing. Rather than reading those statements, I incorporate them here and by reference. And with that, I will turn the call over to Brad.

Thanks, Aaron. Good morning everyone. And thank you for joining us to discuss LP’s results for the third quarter and our full year outlook. As you all know, the third quarter saw a significant slowdown in single-family housing starts, which no doubt contributed to the normalization of OSB prices. This is a challenge for commodity OSB results, but also provides an opportunity to demonstrate the value of LP’s transformation against the backdrop of a slowdown in new residential construction. LP’s strategic focus on the repair and remodel market segment and higher value-added specialty products drove continued growth. In fact, the Siding segment generated more revenue than the OSB segment in Q3. And within OSB, the majority of the revenue came from the more specialized Structural Solutions portfolio. Our disciplined capital allocation strategy continues to prioritize and support investment in the capacity necessary to enable future growth. Pages 5 and 6 of the presentation show some high-level results for the quarter. LP earned $200 million in EBITDA in the quarter and received about another $200 million in net proceeds from the EWP sale. In Q3, we invested $86 million in capital projects to drive future growth and returned $341 million to shareholders, the bulk of which was spent to repurchase 5.6 million shares. LP ended the quarter with a very strong balance sheet, including $482 million in cash and over $1 billion in available liquidity. Page 7 shows more detail on Siding solutions growth. Recall, only about 40% of Siding volume goes into the single-family new construction with a growing majority dedicated to R&R, shares and other DIY applications. Through Q3, single-family starts fell by about 5% on a trailing 12-month basis. In contrast, Siding solutions volume grew by 6% and price increased by 13% over the past 12 months. Comparing only the third quarter single-family starts, they were down 18% compared to last year. But Siding sales grew by 27% with SmartSide and ExpertFinish both setting new records for volume and price in the quarter. In both Siding and Structural Solutions, product innovation continues to drive growth. In Siding, new products made up 11% of volume in January to 15% of Siding's revenue in the quarter. ExpertFinish and BuilderSeries are the fastest growing product categories within Siding where ExpertFinish volume grew by 48%. Structural Solutions volume grew by 10% compared to the prior year quarter. The newest edition to the Structural Solutions portfolio, NovaCore Insulated Sheathing, officially launched last week. NovaCore launch is a priceless product not connected to random links. LP is committed to making the investments necessary to continue this growth and innovation. Slide 8 shows an update on our strategic capacity planning. Houlton remains ahead of schedule and should finish the year running near full rated capacity. Sagola, Michigan, which is the next Siding press capacity addition after Houlton will cease OSB production this week to start the final phases of the conversion process. This will remove roughly 420 million square feet of OSB capacity and once fully up and running add about 320 million feet of siding capacity annually, bringing total siding capacity to about 2.3 billion square feet. Sagola is expected to produce SmartSide in Q1 of next year. It should ramp up at about the same rate that Houlton has, progressing from panel and soffit then ultimately to lap and trim with a roughly linear ramp-up from start to full production run over three to four quarters. For ExpertFinish, the expansion of LP’s finishing facility in Green Bay is nearly complete. The latest project in Bath, New York will add ExpertFinish capacity in the strategically important northeastern market. This project remains on schedule with production expected to begin in Q2 of 2023. And today we can announce two more capacity additions in the Siding business. Pending final approvals from state and local regulators and other stakeholders we will build on the success of the Holten conversion project by expanding that mill. This project will add a new forming line in press with Holten joining Hayward as our second two-line siding facility. New siding production there should begin in mid to late 2024 and will more than double Holten's capacity, improving the utilization of sheer green in and finishing processes. Holten's second line will bring total Siding press capacity to roughly 2.6 billion square feet. To accelerate ExpertFinish growth, we plan to add a new facility in Washington State to better serve the growing prefinished siding markets in the Pacific Northwest. Compared to the 2021 capacity baseline for ExpertFinish, expansion over our existing pre-finished facilities, plus new capacity at the New York and Washington sites puts LP on a path to more than double pre-finishing capacity by the end of 2023. And we are on pace to double ExpertFinish capacity again by 2025. These projects will add scale, efficiency and geographic range while simultaneously driving down cost. We believe that the long-term fundamentals for housing and R&R remain very favorable despite near-term turbulence and we are investing to meet that demand. Given our current visibility into order files, inventory levels, and the capacity expansions that I just outlined, we anticipate remaining on managed order file for prime products at least until Sagola provides meaningful volume in Q2 of next year and potentially throughout 2023 for ExpertFinish. In order to ensure that we can generate value over the long-term, we remain focused on enhancing our sustainable business model. This includes long-term access to responsibly managed fiber resources, efficient production processes that minimize waste and emissions, carbon-negative products that sequester more CO2 than is emitted in their manufacturing distribution, and building a team that is welcoming and inclusive for all who have the talent and desire to contribute to LP’s growth. We plan to publish our second sustainability report tomorrow. So stay tuned for more detail about our sustainability performance and strategy. As we look towards Q4 and next year, inflationary pressures continue to provide headwind. Alan will provide more detail on this in a moment, but so far, LP’s growth continues to more than offset the cost impact of raw material and wage inflation. Mortgage rates of 7% or more will worsen affordability especially for first-time home buyers, and this is likely a contributing factor for softening housing starts. But as we head into a potentially weaker housing market, I remain optimistic about two factors. First, I remain bullish about the long-term fundamentals for housing and repair and remodeling. And second, I am more convinced than ever that LP's strategy of growing Siding & Structural Solutions and managing our capital and capacity with discipline is the right approach in any market. And with that I will turn the call over to Alan for a more detailed review of the quarter before we take your questions.

Thanks Brad. As we've said, the third quarter of 2022 set new records for Siding. Despite general economic headwinds and slowing single-family housing starts, LP continues to grow Siding and Structural Solutions, and that growth continues to offset the impacts of raw material and wage inflation. The waterfall on Slide 9 provides a summary of revenue and EBITDA compared to the third quarter of last year for Siding. Revenue grew year-over-year by $82 million or 27% to $394 million, prices were 16% higher due to the combined effective two list price increases in the past three quarters in addition to the mix of lift from ExpertFinish. These higher prices added $51 million of revenue and EBITDA. Volumes were 9% higher as a result of the Houlton mill's ongoing ramp-up, as well as continued improvement in overall equipment effectiveness or OEE, which rose 2 points over last year. Volume growth contributed $31 million of revenue and $12 million of EBITDA. Inflation produced $32 million of direct cost headwinds, of which $23 million was in raw materials and $7 million in freight. And the final $14 million of cost increases largely relates to sustaining maintenance of the mills together with increased prices for MRO materials. But in summary, growth and price, which we believe are permanent more than offset inflation, which we hope is not; the result was a rather healthy $90 million in EBITDA, a 23% margin. Slide 10 shows the waterfall for the OSB business. Now, the growth story is broadly consistent with that of siding with increases in Structural Solutions volume offsetting raw material and wage inflation. But this similarity is overshadowed by the drop in commodity OSB prices, which reduced the year-over-year revenue and EBITDA by $252 million. The final $20 million EBITDA headwind on the waterfall reflects increased maintenance costs and the impact of somewhat reduced OEE. The resulting $130 million in EBITDA slightly outperformed our algorithmic guidance in part due to favorable price realization, without which the impact of falling commodity prices would have been more severe. But in both businesses, inflationary pressures were driven primarily by natural gas and benzene, which are key inputs for resins, overlays, paints, and waxes and by crude oil, which increases the cost of freight both inbound and outbound. Page 11 aggregates these impacts to show a high-level summary for LP as a whole. The largest single factor is, of course, commodity OSB prices. The $18 million in revenue and $12 million in EBITDA from increased commodity OSB volume is largely the difference in Peace Valley's output as it has ramped up over the past year. Siding growth net of selling and marketing investments added $60 million in EBITDA and Structural Solutions growth added $24 million from which for the purposes of this analysis, I will deduct $7 million representing the lost opportunity to sell commodity volume instead of higher-margin Structural Solutions. North American inflationary costs including the inflationary components of the other mill costs listed in the waterfalls results in a $65 million headwind. The net positive $12 million of EBITDA, that is $77 million from growth against $65 million of inflation shows that once again LP's growth is offsetting inflation. When raw material and freight prices normalize, then all else equal, the potential for margin enhancement is substantial. South America referred to on the slide as LPSA saw similar raw material inflation and demand appears to be slowing more meaningfully than in North America, but a constant dollar exchange rates revenue fell year-over-year by $12 million or 16% and EBITDA fell by $17 million. Slide 12 shows cash flow for the quarter and it tells a story of very consistent capital allocation. LP generated $200 million in EBITDA from continuing operations plus another $14 million from EWP in July. Taxes in some working capital movements produced $195 million in cash and cash flow. The diversity of the EWP Segment produced another $206 million in proceeds and as Brad said, we essentially took this inflow of around $400 million, invested what we needed in the business, and returned the balance to shareholders. Cash at quarter end was almost flat, hovering just under $500 million, so when combined with our undrawn revolver we ended the quarter with over $1 billion of liquidity. I also want to point out that third quarter share buybacks have lowered LP's share count to 71.7 million, a reduction of 50% from the end of 2018 when repurchase activity began in earnest. Furthermore, the $1.72 in adjusted diluted earnings per share would have been $0.37 per share, or 22% lower had it not been for share repurchases over the past 12 months. And while the lower OSB prices we are experiencing right now may have reduced the magnitude of cash flows with the result that share repurchases will slow proportionately, our capital allocation strategy remains unchanged. We will continue to earn cash, invest in growth and return the balance to shareholders, specifically in that order. Slide 13 shows guidance for the fourth quarter and full year. With work accelerating on converting the Sagola OSB mill to Siding production, the fourth quarter will be the highest for CapEx this year, bringing us to somewhere between $400 million and $420 million in total spending for 2022. Just under $200 million of that spend was for the Sagola mill conversions, and we'll spend just under $100 million on other growth projects to expand capacity in ExpertFinish and Structural Solutions and between $120 million and $130 million in sustaining maintenance. And as Brad said earlier, we continue to add Siding capacity with the planned expansion of Houlton. Now, adding a new forming line and press at Houlton will be substantially more expensive than converting an existing mill. As such an early preview of CapEx for 2023 would seem to be in order. The expansion of Houlton is expected to cost in the order of $400 million with a rate of return of about 30%. Spending on that project will significantly ramp up in the latter part of 2023 with the result that total CapEx next year will likely be closer to $500 million than this year's $410 million. And there is substantial flexibility in the system to delay these capital outlays should circumstances warrant. However, demand for Siding remains strong and we expect year-over-year sales growth in the fourth quarter of at least 30% and taking demand as a given. This growth is enabled by the additional capacity from Houlton's continuing ramp-up, as well as the non-recurrence of press rebuild in the fourth quarter of last year, which provided a soft comparison, and this would bring full-year Siding revenue growth to about 24%. OSB prices have been essentially flat for the past several weeks, and if we assume that they maintain their current levels, we expect OSB revenue to fall by about 30% sequentially quarter-over-quarter. In addition to price reductions, revenue in the fourth quarter will be impacted by lower output due to Sagola's conversion to Siding, the interruption caused by a fire at Clarke County in October, and typical year-end maintenance outages. The result of all this would be a fourth-quarter EBITDA for LP as a whole of around $100 million, and within that $100 million we expect Siding EBITDA of at least $85 million for a fourth-quarter Siding margin of around 23%. And with that, I'll turn the call back over to the operator for Q&A.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Susan Maklari from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning everyone. My first question is looking at this Siding business, can you talk a little bit about channel inventories there and what you're seeing just in terms of overall order rates? We've heard from a lot of building product companies this last couple of weeks that things are obviously starting to moderate on the ground. So can you just help us understand better what you're seeing there and contrasting your growth relative to what's happening in the broader industry?

Susan, we're still on managed order file and as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, expect to stay on managed order file at least through Q1 of next year, and so right now our demand pulls are still strong. Channel inventories in Siding remain on the lean side of where we would like them to be at this for this time of year. And so from that standpoint and look it's hard when we're oversold or all managed order file, you're not sure how much more you could sell if you had it. But currently, the strength of the order file remains pretty stable. These additions to capacity particularly at Houlton are going to provide this incremental volume to sell over the next several quarters. And so the managed order file situation could change, but as of today it still has a very healthy order file.

Okay. That's helpful. And then following up, can we talk a little bit more about inflation and the supply chain and how you're thinking about those costs coming through over the next couple of quarters? And the ability to sustain price as the macro and as housing does moderate to hold the margins that you've been seeing, especially in the Siding segment?

Yes, Susan, I feel good. As Alan mentioned in his remarks, our Siding pricing historically for the last 20 years or so has been very sticky. Once we get it we've essentially never given it up especially on the price list sometimes to respond to competitive situations. We can work around with rebates to specific customers, but I mean, I feel good about the pricing that we've gotten this year. We are planning to go out in January with another 3% to 5% list price increase announcement to help offset some of the late this year's later inflation that we are experiencing now. So I don't anticipate us using price to generate demand next year; that's typically not how this product goes to market. I feel like our price to cost ratio is going to stay and kind of where it's at. It's always a matter of timing; inflation can get ahead of our ability to get the price increase through the channel etc., but so far we've been able to keep up with it and I anticipate being able to do that in the first part of next year as well.

Okay. Thanks for the color and good luck with everything.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question. The next question is from Sean Steuart with TD Securities. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning everyone. It's actually filling in for Sean. Sticking with the price theme, just to follow-up on the realizations this quarter for Siding, I think they were up 5% relative to Q2. I know you implemented price hikes of 2% to 3% on July 1st. Can you comment on what factor mix played this quarter?

Actually, you broke up right at the last part of your question.

No problem. Sorry about that, Brad. I'm just wondering if you can comment on to what extent mix played a role this quarter?

Yes. Mix can play a role, but most of that price increase was attributed to the major price increase. So maybe 1% mix, but the rest was all from pricing.

Okay. And I know you commented on buybacks, the return activities slowing down a bit just in tandem with commodity markets slowing down. But can you just remind us how much you have left on your current program? I think it was $600 million authorization. How much is left right now, if anything, and any share buyback activity in Q4 to date?

We have $200 million remaining on the authorization and there's no share buybacks to date this quarter.

Okay, wonderful. Thanks for the context. I appreciate it. I'll turn it over.

Thank you very much for your question. And our next question comes from George Staphos with Bank of America Securities. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thanks very much. Alan, Aaron, and Brad good morning congratulations on the progress. I wanted to ask first question on the supply chain and costs; are you seeing any kind of – if you will green shoot in recovery and improvement especially on labor, especially on freight, and then related and there are no guarantees in life, we won't hold you to this, but is your expectation that if things go as planned we don't see a material drop off in demand in Siding. Sagola comes up to curve as you'd expect that you can maintain your current level of margin or maybe get to the 25% next year. How would you have us think about those two questions?

Well on supply chain yes, we are seeing freight trucking free up more than we've experienced all year and so that has certainly improved the availability of freight and somewhat impacted cost. On the labor side, I mean, we're still fighting to maintain staffing at our operations group and to a certain extent in sales, but I would say it's not – certainly not gotten any worse in the second half of the year. And then as far as overall cost because of the way that most of our big supply contracts are indexed to a base material, and most of those are in some way associated with oil and benzene directly, we currently haven't seen any green shoots on cost reductions. But obviously we're watching oil closely. And if that were to trend downward there could be some opportunities for some cost relief next year though, we're currently not seeing that. And then as far as margin for next year at the 25% rate with the Sagola ramp-up there will certainly be inefficiencies associated with that. We have not finalized our raw material input costing for next year as far as our budget process, we have decided to initiate a price increase at the beginning of the year. So I mean, I think we could – well, depending on the ramp of Sagola and depending on no incremental cost increases around raw material we could get back to more around the 25% rate. But there's a lot of unknowns around that number again given the uncertainty about the Sagola ramp-up and raw material inputs. But I will say this, I feel good about what we're doing on the stuff we can control specifically around pricing. We've been demonstrating good price discipline in Siding and getting it where and when we can. So, we will continue to focus on that as far as protecting our margins.

Thanks, Brad. Two other questions on Siding and I'll turn it over. So first of all, can you talk about the ability of the fiber basket around Houlton to take on that second line? Maybe it's a non-event, but if you could just give us a bit of parameters there. And then when you're done with Houlton, I want to say in your prepared remarks you said you're going to have, along with the other pre-finishing investments that you're making, you're going to have additional offering scale. If you could kind of go back through what the additional capabilities you'll have inside when you're done with Houlton Line 2 and with the other pre-finishing operations that would be great? Thank you, guys.

Yes, one of the main reasons for our expansion in Houlton is the availability of a strong wood supply. There have been some reductions in wood-related manufacturing in the Maine area over the years, but the availability of pulpwood there is good. We also find the Aspen wood supply, which we prefer, to be very strong. This was a key factor in our decision to expand production in Houlton. Regarding our expansions in the siding business, particularly in pre-finish, we are currently adding coating lines at our facility in Green Bay. We also have facilities in St. Louis and North Carolina, and we are constructing a large facility in Bath, New York, which will allow for further expansion by adding pipelines. Additionally, we are starting engineering on a new facility in Washington. I see further growth opportunities in the central part of the country, west of St. Louis. With our North Carolina facility and the new Bath facility, we believe we will adequately cover the east coast. As we continue to grow in siding, adding capacity will be crucial beyond Houlton Line 2. The pre-finished segment allows for easier growth since we can simply add paint lines at our existing facilities to increase capacity. In the grand scheme, these additional paint lines are relatively low-cost investments, so we can add capacity efficiently.

Thank you, Brad.

Thank you for your questions. Our next question comes from Kurt Yinger with D.A. Davidson. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Great, thanks and good morning everyone. Just wanted to start off on the outlook for OSB to be down 30% sequentially on sales with some of the noise around Sagola and the Clarke County mill. Could you, I guess, help us think about how much of that is price versus volume embedded in that?

So the Sagola capacity purchases there and the Sagola capacity is about a little over 400 annually. We shut it down now; that's going to be, call it, 100 per quarter, but less than that because we're mid-quarter. So price is likely to be a larger component of that than volume. But there is some volume coming out as a combination of Sagola and typical quarter-end maintenance outages that are common this time of year.

Got it. Okay, thanks for that, Alan. And then I guess a two-parter on Houlton as you think about getting the facility positioned for production in mid-to-late 2024, how much of the pacing of that work will kind of be dependent on the macro? And if you get to the point and everything's ready to go, but the demand isn't there to justify a startup; how would you think about additional fixed costs associated with that mill and just expanding the capacity but not necessarily running it?

It's a good question. And so obviously where we are today, it would be easy to delay the Houlton Line 2 capacity expansion as we had some outlook that was dire around Siding demand, which we currently don't have. And as we get closer to gaining construction and all that stuff, it gets harder to push those back, especially when it comes to the purchases we've made early. Let me back up a little bit from that answer to explain that because machinery and presses and the embossing plates are so tight, we are actively engaged in doing as much procurement as we can early in order to secure that material and necessarily manufacturing of that equipment. And so from a cost standpoint on the equipment, that gets harder and harder to lay, I mean really beginning right now as we place those orders, where we could push is around the construction labor as far as erecting it. So it'll be something we can talk about as we go through next year, quarter-to-quarter. But obviously once we get Sagola up and going over the next couple quarters, it'll be all hands on deck getting Houlton Line 2 up, and because we're expecting to need that capacity.

No, that’s alright. I mean, I guess the last one is just you talked about the fiber basket, but outside of that were there any other kind of big factors that chose you to go with the Houlton expansion versus some of the other kind of capacity alternatives that you talked about?

The biggest thing was timing. We felt like our ability to get that mill up and running with the second line, given the infrastructure that is in place there, certainly was quicker than any of the OSB conversions we could have done. And by an order of magnitude faster than doing a Greenfield, and so that was really the driving factor. I'll add two others. First is the quality of the workforce at our Houlton facility is very high. This is evidenced by how well Houlton Line 1 conversion is going. So we really have a lot of confidence about ability to execute both on the construction and the ramp-up phase of that project. And then thirdly, being in the Northeast again gives us a little more geographic diversity versus the central part of the country where we are really concentrated as far as manufacturing. And it also compliments our repair and remodel push which northeast, mid-Atlantic all down the east coast is a really good repair remodel market. With us adding the pre-finished capacity in Bath, New York and obviously that would be very efficient transportation between Houlton and Bath. So all those factors and a few more criteria, in the context of our alternatives made Houlton apply to kind of a no-brainer for us.

Okay. Great. Well thanks for that Brad, and good luck here in Q4 guys.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Our next participant is Mark Weintraub with Seaport Global Securities. Your phone line is now open. Please proceed.

Thank you. Two lines of inquiry. First, on the Houlton expansion if I heard right, $400 million in capital, I think, Alan, you mentioned a 30% type return and also suggested that it was about 300 million square foot of incremental capacity. So, I guess the question was, so if I take the $400 million and kind of simplistically say, well $400 million and 30% or so am I going to have $120 million plus of EBITDA increment? And then if I look at the average pricing you have in your Siding right now that would be really high margins, like 50% type margins. Now, of course, it could be that this is a sweeter mix and so has higher average prices, or is it really low costs? I mean can you just help us out in kind of understanding how the economics work as you see it for the Houlton expansion? Thank you.

You kind of got it right Mark. So you are right about the very high margin of an independent siding mill given the progress we've made on pricing, mix, and so on. Fundamentally, high level delivers about a 50% EBITDA margin in isolation as a mill. Now the business doesn't deliver that level because we obviously have a set of fixed costs, selling costs, and marketing costs, so aren't necessarily included in that analysis. So, yes, the mill economically described it, right. There is significant operating leverage we get from adding another mill into an already effective network. Yes.

Okay, great. Thank you. And then on the fourth quarter guidance, can you give us where your OSB prices average quarter-to-date and currently are relative to the third quarter?

Well, Mark this is Alan. The prices in the guide using the algorithmic approach that we've consistently stuck with the past several quarters. And why random links print from last Friday. I think the North Central was about 350 on a 716 basis last Friday. So the guide assumes that for modeling purposes that that remains stable at that level.

And so is that roughly a $50 or $60 decline from what you would have averaged in the third quarter?

Yes, that is right. Again, pretty close Mark, your math is good.

Okay. And then if I'm down 30% in revenue, just want to make sure. So basically, am I expecting like a 10% or so decline from volumes or something else because I'm down?

Yes, I think it was Kurt's question earlier about volume. I will just remind you that Sagola comes out this week. And then we may finally for the first time in about three years have a little bit of breathing room at the end of the year to take some maintenance-related downtime around the holidays. The combination of those effects would account for roughly the level of volume that you assumed.

Both of which are incorporated loosely in our algorithmic guide.

Got it.

Thanks, Mark.

Thank you for your question Mark. And we're setting up for the next person. And our next person is Mike Roxland from Truist Securities. Your line is now open. Go ahead.

Thanks very much for taking the questions.

Yes.

Sorry about that. Just a quick question on the broader housing market. Are you seeing – are there any pockets of strengths? The housing market obviously is rolling over. Builders are – the cancellation rates are higher. Are there any markets that you've noted in terms of you've noted brand that your Siding is held up relatively well? Are there any markets that are particularly showing strength relative to the decline that we're seeing more broadly in the national market?

So within the market for single-family new construction, generally speaking, the south is stronger than the north. And we're seeing that in our polls in both OSB and Siding. Some of that may be weather-related as we get into the fall season, and we'll see as it plays through November and December how the south is impacted. But relatively speaking, stronger in the south and the north.

Got you. Okay. And then just on the BuilderSeries, which tends to be one of the fastest-growing components of Siding, and just given the stress that many builders are facing, how has that product particularly fared? Is the demand still strong or have you seen some trading given just a slowdown in housing?

Demand is still really strong for that. Obviously, we got to be careful about percentage growth when last year was zero. So it makes it for a very high percentage growth. But we're very pleased with that launch. I believe given some of the costing pressure, cost pressure and labor availability issues, the product was engineered to address both of those. And so it has put us in a position particularly with the larger builders to have a value proposition that's pretty attractive. We have been very well pleased with the conversations that have led to orders and then the outlook for that product given, I mean, honestly, given this environment. So I mean obviously that will be – if housing is way down next year, that will provide a headwind to that product. But I will say from a market share standpoint, I feel like we've got an opportunity to significantly increase our market share with large national and regional builders.

Got it. And this one final question, on order files, I think last quarter you mentioned signing on allocation. I think you reiterated that earlier. Again line of sight in terms of order files of four to six weeks in Siding, OSB, you are not seeing any order weakness, but you had line of sight the two to four weeks out. Any change in terms of the order books and your order files in both Siding and OSB?

Not really. But certainly not in OSB. I would call the market pretty balanced right now. And obviously that's shown up in the pricing reported in the random length. In Siding it's a similar thing where we're allocating orders, so we're six to six plus weeks out on the order file so we're pretty much in the same place that we were last quarter, as far as the outlook for Siding and the strength of the order file.

Great. I appreciate all the color, Brad. And good luck for the balance of the year.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question, Mike. Our next question comes from John Tumazos of John Tumazos Very Independent Research LLC. Please go ahead, John.

Thank you for taking my question. A few months ago, I had the pleasure of putting SmartSide on my house, which I'm very pleased with. It cost me installed $11,000 per 1000 square feet versus your sales realization in the 800s. And I bought prefinished, so maybe it cost a few hundred dollars more than that. And the crew of six people worked about 22 hours, and they worked hard. They were good. And it struck me that there are other applications like the people that use lasers to measure before they install granite countertops or the TV ad for the floor mats in your car that are laser measured or the bathtub fixtures, things like that, that there is a lot of potential to improve the precision of the installation of SmartSide through the implementation of technology. And if you improve the productivity of the installers by 10%, it might enable you to charge a $1,000 more for SmartSide, since what matters to the customer is the installed cost. Could you just talk a little bit about your efforts to train installers and improve productivity in that phase of the value added, which would enable you to charge more for the product?

John, first of all, thank you for putting SmartSide on your house. I'm pleased to hear it went well. That is certainly a testament to the product and to your installer. Kind of in the direction that your question is focused. We do actively work with a set of contractors. We have various loyalty programs where we provide both online and in-person training in depth on about how to install our product because as John has mentioned, we want that experience to be really well for the homeowner, for them to see, that Siding put up efficiently, and it being beautiful and functional once it's installed. And so, the marketing spins that we have is, and for most purposes, directed at making sure that our contractor base is enabled to understand the product and install it efficiently. There is a lot of opportunity for product enhancement around this R&R Siding market related to labor efficiency. If you think about it, the whole concept of pre-finished is one of those where you are eliminating the secondary step of painting when it's on the wall. But the opportunity for us to do things as far as accessories related to improving that efficiency, like the three-dimensional corners that we've launched over the last couple of years, that save a big labor step, those kind of products really can provide the contractor with an efficiency that allows him to better utilize his labor, lower the cost of an install, and then ultimately our objective is to increase the profitability of both us and the contractor as part of that sales process. So, you're dead-on. Your observation of watching Siding being installed and the ideas around continued improvement, and product innovation and service innovation that improves the efficiency of that is certainly one of the most attractive features of the repair and remodel segment that we're playing in now. We want to get really good at turning those value propositions into profit for our sales and the contractor base that supports our product.

If I could continue, do you think it's fair for your mill realization to be on the order of one-tenth of the installed cost of the customer? Do you think that the distributors – the demand for your product is so high that the distributors are getting an inordinate markup?

No, I don't believe. I think fair is a complex word, in business transactions. But I do believe – look, we have really good distributor partners that over the years we have actively upgraded to specialty, to more of a specialty-focused network. We are proud that our business model is centered around providing opportunities for profitability throughout the channel and with our contractor base. Ultimately to have that product delivered efficiently enough so that you decided to install it on your home given the price that you were quoted. But there is no – right now we don't feel compelled in any way in trying to take margin out of the channel as a means to improving our profitability. We want to improve our profitability by working on the costs that we can control directly and by managing pricing.

Thank you. And let me add the Hurricane Ian passed ten miles south of me two months after the job was done and everything held up great.

Thank you so much for your questions, John.

Okay, thank you operator. And thank you everyone for joining us to discuss LP's results for the third quarter of 2022. With no further questions we’ll bring the call to a close there. Stay safe and we'll look forward to speaking with you all again soon.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.