Hello and welcome to the Stratasys' Q4 2022 Conference Call and Webcast. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Yonah Lloyd, Chief Communications Officer and Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us to discuss our 2022 fourth quarter and full-year financial results. On the call with us today are our CEO, Dr. Yoav Zeif; and our CFO, Eitan Zamir. I would like to remind you that access to today's call, including the slide presentation is available online at the web address provided in our press release. In addition, a replay of today's call, including access to the slide presentation will also be available and can be accessed through the investor relations section of our website. Please note that some of the information you will hear during our discussion today will consist of forward-looking statements, including without limitation, those regarding our expectations as to our future revenue, gross margin, operating expenses, taxes, and other future financial performance and our expectations for our business outlook. All statements that speak to future performance, events, expectations, or results are forward-looking statements. Actual results or trends could differ materially from our forecast. For risks that could cause actual results to be materially different from those set forth in forward-looking statements, please refer to the risk factors discussed or referenced in Stratasys' annual report on Form 20-F for the 2021 year and for the 2022 year which will be filed later today U.S. time with the SEC. Please also refer to our operating and financial review and prospects for 2021 and 2022. Please also see the press release that announces our earnings for the fourth quarter of 2022, which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to report on Form 6-K that we are furnishing to the SEC today. Stratasys assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information, which speak as of their respective dates. As in previous quarters, today's call will include GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures should be read in combination with our GAAP metrics to evaluate our performance. Non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliations are provided in tables in our slide presentation and today's press release. I will now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Yoav Zeif, Yoav?

Thank you, Yonah. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. Our encouraging and profitable results this quarter demonstrate the resilience of our business, the diversity of our offerings, and the overall fiscal health of Stratasys as we perform well against the challenging environment for our entire industry and the broader economy that continues today. Importantly, we delivered our sixth consecutive quarter of profitability on an adjusted basis. Our strategy is focused on being the leading innovator and provider of polymer-based additive manufacturing solutions. We have a broad, global diverse set of both organic and acquired technology offerings and unique go-to-market capabilities. We believe that the partnerships we have today and expect to build in the future will drive their increased adoption and ultimately our overall financial results. We remain laser-focused on managing our operations to effectively execute sustained profitable growth for years to come. Our full-year results provide great clarity into the potential power of our business model. We generated top line growth of 7.3% versus 2021 and taking into account the divestment of MakerBot this past September, we grew 11.4% on a constant currency basis, overcoming inflationary and other pressures that accelerated over the course of the year. Our gross margin for the year, a major focus for the team, was slightly higher despite these many headwinds as price increases helped offset cost pressures. As our new technologies ramp and our operational efficiencies continue, we expect gross margin will strengthen in the coming years. For full-year 2022, our revenues from manufacturing came in at 32.5% of our total revenues demonstrating the ongoing transition from prototyping to manufacturing at scale our customers are undergoing today. I'm particularly pleased we were also able to deliver $0.15 in adjusted EPS in 2022. Furthermore, we once again ended the quarter with a strong balance sheet that includes no debt. This continues to provide stability through challenging times and optionality to support our growth through organic investment as well as accretive acquisition opportunities that we uncover. We spoke last quarter about the challenges our customers continue to face that are impacting their purchasing behavior. There are still inflationary pressures and concerns around the potential recession impacting capital spending decisions by our customers. This resulted in headwinds in the second half of 2022 that we still see today with longer sales cycles and occasional deferrals of orders continuing to impact our results. And while these challenges are causing near-term headwinds, the benefits of 3D printing such as improved production efficiency, better performing parts, reduced logistic costs, and faster time to market become even more apparent in times like this, our engagement with customers around all our technologies remains strong and the results in our service business were the best in eight quarters. It is noteworthy that in 2022, recurring revenue increased meaningfully with consumables up 7.7% over 2021, excluding MakerBot, and customer support up 11% both at constant currency. This reflects the fact that the hardware growth of our installed base in 2021 and 2022 is driving utilization, which should positively impact long-term sales of higher margin consumables as initial supplies are exhausted. 2022 was a year of both focused execution and investment. Over the course of the year, we invested to position ourselves for growth in coming years. We acquired Riven, an AI software company that helps customer quickly create consistently and accurately usable production cloud at scale. We invested in Axial3D, a cloud-based AI driven 3D printing platform that enables healthcare providers to easily segment CT and MRI scans for anatomic models. We plan to unlock new sales opportunities in materials highlighted by our announced Covestro AM acquisition expected to close in the second quarter. MakerBot joined forces with Ultimaker to form a leading desktop 3D printing company. This move was immediately accretive to our margin and our large minority stake includes commercial rights to engage their customers as they move through their additive manufacturing journey. We announced our first validated third-party high-performance materials for Stratasys FDM printers. These materials, along with open material licenses for FDM and Origin, are expected to generate new business opportunities for Stratasys such as service bureaus in the coming years. We also continue to advance our own material. For example, we collaborated with Lockheed Martin on our Antero materials that is space-ready and published qualification data enabling others in the industry to use it for aerospace parts. And in healthcare, we created realistic anatomic modeling materials for use with CT scans and other images. As we expand our offering to support manufacturing across our entire 3D printing technology portfolio, software is critical to crossing the additive manufacturing chasm from early adopters to early majority. This is evidenced by the fact that we have customers who now use multiple Stratasys technologies and are able to rely on the advantages of having a single software application platform GrabCAD across all of them, which is truly a differentiator for us. In 2022, we expanded GrabCAD's integration with many of our offerings, added new software partners to our GrabCAD platform and introduced GrabCAD print software for the H350, Origin One, and Origin One Dental 3D Printers. I'd like to spend a few minutes giving added details on two of our key end markets in healthcare, dental and medical. The dental opportunity for Stratasys is one of the largest and most exciting growth avenues for us as a company. Our focus remains on non-elective dental parts such as dentures, crowns, bridges and surgical guides. The dental industry as a whole is worth well over $50 billion and produces the highest volume of end-use parts in additive manufacturing today. We believe the dental sector will become one of our strongest growth drivers in the future. As we noted would happen on our last call, we are very excited to have recently launched TrueDent, a new resin for producing dentures. TrueDent was invented at Stratasys and is exclusively compatible with our J5 DentaJet. It enables labs to create permanent, natural-looking dentures with accurate tooth structure, shade, and translucency all in one continuous print. It is our first FDA cleared medical device specifically for use in the fabrication of removable dentures and temporary crowns and regions. According to a recent IDATA Study, dentures represent an over $5 billion opportunity today, of the 4.2 million dentures created annually in the U.S. Only 5% are created digitally. We believe TrueDent provides the leap in workflow efficiency required to transition most of the industry from traditional dentures to 3D printed ones. In connection with TrueDent, we also announced a partnership with 3Shape, a leader in digital dental workflow. 3Shape has integrated TrueDent into their denture design module, allowing dental files to seamlessly export to our GrabCAD software. Our customers will benefit with the most accurate parts possible, created more quickly and affordably than other traditional mailing or additive options on the market. We also recently announced the launch of our newest printer, the J3 DentaJet. The J3 is an entry-level multi-material solution focused on implant models and surgical guides that we believe provides the best accuracy in the market and is tailored towards small and medium-sized labs that represent two-thirds of all labs in the dental industry. We have timed these two significant announcements with two major dental trade shows in the U.S. and Germany, LMT LAB DAY last week and the IDS show later this month, and we are meeting with top dental labs at the show. The result is that we expect to start making measurable progress in 2023 on growing our presence in the large dental industry. Another key growth area for the company is medical. We formally launched our patient-specific solution made possible by our Q4 investment in Axial3D. With this solution, healthcare providers and medical device companies can use a cloud service to quickly go from medical scan to 3D printed anatomical model without large upfront capital expenses. The solution uses Axial3D's AI powered software to prepare medical files for 3D printing and Stratasys 3D printers to provide visual or biomechanically realistic models that are used for pre-operative surgical planning and diagnostic purposes and fulfilled by Ricoh using our digital anatomy J5 MediJet or Origin One 3D printers. Most surgeons and radiologists are not yet using 3D printed models and we believe this service offering can be a way to accelerate majority adoption. Importantly, later this year, we plan to launch a prospective clinical study to prove the value of using patient-specific anatomical models as a pre-operative surgical planning tool. Stratasys will be the first 3D printing manufacturer to run such a study, positioning us to lead this exciting new area with evidence, new service offerings, new marketing tools, and a supportive pool of key opinion leaders that will be part of this trial. We believe that using 3D printed models as part of pre-operative planning can result in favorable clinical and economical outcomes, and we look forward to sharing more after we conclude the study. I will now turn the call over to our CFO, Eitan Zamir, to share the financial results and our initial outlook for 2023. Eitan?

Thank you, Yoav, and good morning everyone. We achieved solid results against an increasingly challenging environment in the quarter and for the full year. Importantly, our OEM business grew 3.2% in the fourth quarter of 2022 on a constant currency basis compared to the fourth quarter of 2021. We are particularly proud of the reduction in OpEx as a percentage of revenues to its lowest level in eight quarters, which shows the progress we're making on driving efficiencies across the platform. And we executed on our operating income guidance by meeting our promise to deliver higher than 2% as we continue to improve that metric. In general, our results demonstrate the resilience our diversified offerings provide, which led to our sixth consecutive quarter of profitability. Now let me dive deeper into the numbers. For the fourth quarter, consolidated revenue of $159.3 million was down 4.6%, and revenue adjusted for constant currency was down 2.8% from the prior year period. When adjusted for the MakerBot divestment, revenue grew 1.7% at constant currency. For our OEM business, which would be backing out MakerBot, revenue was up 3.2% at constant currency. Product revenue in the fourth quarter fell by 5.8% to $111.2 million compared to the same period last year, but grew 1.6% in the fourth quarter excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. Within product revenue, systems revenue was down 11.1% to $54.9 million compared to the same period last year. Excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis, fourth quarter system sales were essentially flat year-over-year. Consumables revenue was essentially flat at $56.3 million in the fourth quarter compared to the same period last year. Excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis, consumables in the fourth quarter grew 4.4% year-over-year. Service revenue was $48.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2022, down 1.9% as compared to the same period last year and up by 1.4% excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. Within service revenue, customer support revenue grew 1.9% compared to the same period last year and increased by 9.9%, excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. For the full year 2022, consolidated revenue was up 7.3%, up 9.6% on a constant currency basis and up 11.4% at constant currency after backing out MakerBot; and for our core OEM business, taking out MakerBot and FDM, growth was 12.5% at constant currency. Product revenue in 2022 grew by 8.3% compared to 2021 and by 13.7%, excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. Within product revenue, system revenue in 2022 increased by 12.6% compared to 2021 and by 20.9%, excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. Consumable revenue was up by 4.3% in 2022 compared to 2021 and by 7.7% excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. For the full year of 2022, service revenue grew by 5.1% compared to 2021 and by 7.1% excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. Within service revenue, customer support revenue in 2022 was up by 6.3% compared to 2021 and by 11% excluding divestitures and on a constant currency basis. Now turning to gross margin, GAAP gross margins was 43.1% for the quarter compared to 43.7% for the same period last year. Non-GAAP gross margin was 48.4% for the quarter compared to 48.7% for the same period last year. The year-over-year slight decrease in gross margin was the result of the negative FX impact offset somewhat by the carve out of MakerBot. For the full year 2022, gross margin was slightly higher year-over-year as price increases helped to offset cost increases. A reminder that our 2022 guidance planned for gross margins to be flat to slightly higher than 2021, and given the increasingly difficult cost environment as the year progressed, we are proud to have been able to deliver on this commitment. GAAP operating expenses were $67.1 million for the quarter compared to $89.2 million during the same period last year, reflecting the elimination of operating expenses of divested entities and further improved operating efficiencies. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $72 million for the quarter compared to $79.6 million during the same period last year. Non-GAAP operating expenses were 45.2% of revenue for the quarter compared to 47.7% for the same period last year. As we continue to focus on operational efficiency improvement, as I just mentioned, OpEx as a percentage of revenue was the lowest level in eight quarters. For the full year, non-GAAP operating expenses were 45.9% of revenue, an improvement of 220 basis points. Regarding our consolidated earnings for the quarter, GAAP operating income for the quarter was $1.6 million compared to a loss of $16.2 million for the same period last year. Non-GAAP operating income for the quarter was $5.1 million compared to $1.7 million for the same period last year. The increase reflects our business scalability and improved operational efficiencies. GAAP net loss for the quarter was $2.4 million or $0.04 per diluted share compared to a net loss of $4.8 million or $0.07 per diluted share for the same period last year. Non-GAAP net income for the quarter was $4.6 million or $0.07 per diluted share compared to net income of $0.5 million or $0.01 per diluted share in the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA of $10.7 million for the quarter compared to $7.9 million in the same period last year reflected our improved profitability levels. Regarding our consolidated earnings for the full year 2022, GAAP operating loss was $57.2 million compared to a loss of $79.2 million for 2021 reflecting operational efficiency. Non-GAAP operating income for the year was $13.5 million compared to a loss of $1.7 million in 2021. As with gross margins, a reminder that despite the increasing challenges as 2022 progressed, we achieved our non-GAAP operating margin guidance of slightly above 2%, coming in at 2.1%. GAAP net loss for the year was $29 million or $0.44 per diluted share compared to a net loss of $62 million or $0.98 per diluted share for last year. GAAP net loss included a $39.1 million gain from the deconsolidation of MakerBot. Non-GAAP net income for the year was $10.3 million or $0.15 per diluted share compared to a loss of $4.3 million or $0.07 per diluted share last year. Adjusted EBITDA of $36.1 million compared to $22.6 million in 2021 reflected our improved profitability levels. We used $18.1 million of cash in our operations during the fourth quarter compared to generating $4.4 million of cash from operations in the same quarter last year. The use of cash was primarily driven by increased inventory purchases. Going forward, we will shift from building inventory and return to more normalized levels. While there may be a quarter or two lag effect, this change will contribute towards us returning to positive cash flow from operations for 2023. We ended the quarter with $327.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term deposits compared to $348.7 million at the end of the third quarter of 2022. During the quarter, we used cash to make investments in companies that we believe will help further advance our strategic goals. Our balance sheet and cash generation profile remain strong and we're well funded and well positioned to weather near-term challenges and capitalize on value-enhancing market opportunities as they are identified. Now let me turn to our initial outlook for 2023. For comparison purposes, 2022 revenue without MakerBot was approximately $625 million. In the back half of last year, we started to see reduced CapEx spending on hardware as many of our customers positioned for a potential recession, and we expect this trend to continue in 2023. Given that, we expect 2023 revenue to be in a range of $620 million to $670 million subject to potential fluctuations in FX. I'll remind you that our first quarter is typically our weakest, the fourth quarter our strongest, and we expect revenue to grow sequentially throughout the year. We also expect the second half of the year to be notably stronger than the first, primarily due to several new products that we're planning to launch. The customer demand feedback for these products has been excellent, and we look forward to sharing more details later in the year. From a gross margin perspective, full-year 2023 is expected to improve modestly to a range of 48% to 49% with the second half stronger than the first half. Based primarily on higher revenue, we expect gross margins to exceed 50% in the next few years. Assuming market conditions improve and our newer technologies and materials ramp, we will continue to invest in our growth engines to generate significant leverage benefit as we responsibly build a strong company for the long-term. In 2023, we expect our operating expenses to range between $290 million to $300 million. We expect operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue to be slightly lower for the full-year relative to 2022. Improving long-term profitability is an important objective for us, and for 2023, we expect to see continued improvement in our earnings. We expect non-GAAP operating margins to be in a range of 2.5% to 3.5% for the full-year with improving profitability through the year, as we will benefit from anticipated revenue growth. For 2023, we anticipate a GAAP net loss of $78 million to $57 million or $1.12 to $0.83 per diluted share, and a non-GAAP net income of $9 million to $17 million or $0.12 to $0.24 per diluted share. I'd like to point out that our adjusted profitability has not seen a sequential decline for the past eight quarters, and while we anticipate some pressure on this metric to start the year, we expect to produce sequential profitability growth as we move through 2023. Adjusted EBITDA for 2023 is expected to be in a range of $35 million to $50 million. We expect to see EBITDA reach 13% to 15% of our revenue long-term. As our margins improve over time, we expect our capital expenditure for 2023 to range between $20 million to $25 million. Finally, we expect to deliver positive operating cash flow for the full year, primarily driven by the growth anticipated in the second half. With that, let me turn the call back over to Yoav for closing remarks.

Thank you, Eitan. Stratasys produced another year of profitable growth while sharpening our focus on our core OEM offerings. As we have stated time and again, the challenges our customers and our business face today in many ways highlight the benefits of additive manufacturing going forward, resulting in confidence for the years ahead, even as we navigate the current environment, we have the balance sheet strength to continue investing in an expanding portfolio of hardware, materials, and software solutions to broaden our market presence. As the relevance and adoption of 3D printing grow, our management team began to forge our path to make Stratasys the leader in polymer 3D printing solutions over two years ago, and the actions we have taken ever since reflect our ongoing execution. I want to thank our global teams for rising to the challenge and helping drive continued profitability as our business grows, creating long-term value for all of our shareholders. With that, let's open it up for questions.

Thank you. We'll now begin the question-and-answer session. Our first question today is from Greg Palm at Craig-Hallum. Your line is now live.

Yes, thanks. This is Danny Eggerichs on for Greg today. I guess we'll just start off more broadly what you're seeing in the market right now. Specifically, any end-markets or geographies that you're seeing particular strength or weaknesses?

Hi, thank you for the question. It's Yoav. We're observing a general microeconomic slowdown in the market, although some regions are less affected than others. Fortunately, Stratasys is highly diversified across geographies, verticals, and technologies, which positions us well to address the varying behaviors of different segments. For instance, in aerospace, after struggling for several quarters, we are now seeing growth as it rebounds post-pandemic. This illustrates how our leadership in FDM is propelling us forward. Conversely, in the medical sector, growth is occurring, but it's not as rapid as in aerospace. However, being the largest player in the market, our size and diversification enable us to balance the performance of different segments while still achieving nearly 10% year-over-year growth without adjustments. We expect to continue this trend of profitable growth in the future.

Yes, that's good. Maybe just in terms of the guide, it sounds like a lot of emphasis on more of the second half, and you said there should be some product announcements there that should help that growth. But how good is your visibility levels that makes you confident in that heightened activity in the second half and maybe what could go right or wrong there?

We are facing a macroeconomic challenge, but we have clarity on what lies ahead. We have confidence in the second half of the year, with several potential positive outcomes. Our product pipeline is strong, and among our five technologies, we rank between one to three in the market, being the clear leader in PolyJet and FDM. In the new technologies, we hold positions two to three. There are many opportunities for growth, such as new product launches across various platforms and the anticipated Covestro deal closure in the second quarter. Eitan can provide more details on the significant impact of our dental offerings, which are transforming the dental restorative market. Our installed base remains the largest in the industry, and although some customers may postpone expenditures due to capital constraints, they continue to use spare parts and consumables, which have shown notable year-over-year growth despite current conditions.

Okay. That's good. I will hop back in line. Thanks.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Paul Chung from JPMorgan. Your line is now live.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. So just on the Ricoh partnership, talk about how that deal came about, how to size that relationship, potential for other kind of future collaborations globally, and then margin and revenue contributions we can expect over time and any kind of similar forays into different verticals would be helpful?

Thank you, Paul. I think the collaboration with Ricoh is a great example of how we are restructuring some key applications of 3D printing in the end-use part space. So we're talking here about medical, about anatomic models. It's a market with huge prospects going forward, but it's stuck at the high end of the hospital and very high-end operations and surgeries, and we want to democratize it to bring it to dozens of thousands of hospitals. And so we need to build a network to make this solution really accessible, and you will see that we will do it also in other types of applications. So how will it work? We collaborate and invest in Axial3D, it's an AI. I would say probably the only AI that transforms, for example, CT or MRI files into files that you can print, and they are the front end that are working with the surgeon or the radiologist. They transform, without labels, just a check automatically the file into a 3D-printed file. And we are building a network, and Ricoh is the first partner in this network where they print on our unique solution, the PolyJet solution for anatomic modeling, like our Adapt and our MediJet, the digital anatomic printing, and we have the right software. We put everything together, and it's an end-to-end solution, to disrupt the market practically because suddenly it's accessible also for most of the hospitals in the world and it offers a huge cost savings compared to the current solution where you need to order the full kit from third-party vendors.

Okay, great. Thanks for that. And then, second on gross margins. Can you talk about the progression there in the past to kind of get back to that 50%? The '23 guide suggests a slight improvement here on flattish revenues, but if we think about 2019, you were at 52% at a similar run rate of revenues. Obviously this year you're getting hit by this year and the past year by component inflation, freight and others. But as those costs inputs ease, expand on the timing you expect and efficiency gains to kind of get you back to 50%? Thank you.

Hi Paul, thanks for the question. It's Eitan. So I guess at the start, you see the progress when you look at our last few quarters and you look at 2022 versus 2023 guidance. You do see that we move towards the 50% plus that we believe we can achieve as we scale our business. We have confidence together with our better operational efficiency. We have inventory levels that can support our business and help us to better manage the fees versus air, freight and obviously, try to improve our mix with more consumables. Take into consideration the Covestro business that comes with better growth margins. We still have some headwinds from FX in 2023 compared to 2022, so that's something that, if you put aside FX could have been even better. But we are very proud, very excited about our ability to improve and increase gross margins also in 2023.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Jim Ricchiuti from Needham & Company. Your line is now live.

Hi, thank you. I'm curious about your full-year guidance and the assumptions you're making regarding the macro environment, especially for the second half of the year. How are you considering the opportunities in the legacy prototyping business compared to manufacturing, where you seem to be gaining some traction? I'm particularly interested in your perspective on the manufacturing segment of the business, which accounts for about a third of the revenues.

Thank you. That's precisely our strategy. It's evident that we have strong foundations in prototyping, which is reflected in our gross margin and recurring revenues. We're doing well with solid recurring revenues. However, the key driver of our growth over the past three years has been our penetration into manufacturing. Initially, this accounted for less than 20% of our overall sales, but in just under three years since we initiated this strategy, it has risen to 32.5%. We are witnessing significant applications for manufacturing, and this transition is truly transforming the company. We are deploying more machines, offering a comprehensive solution with machines as the core. Market research shows that we significantly increased our hardware share of overall industry sales in 2022 compared to the end of 2021. Our strategy is effective, and we're concentrating on creating machines for manufacturing across all five technologies. For instance, in FDM, we are adapting it for manufacturing, particularly in the aerospace sector, producing large files with exceptional quality and precision. We already have hundreds of thousands of parts in use on airplanes. Regarding PolyJet, we are evolving it into an end-use part machine. Recently, we launched TrueDent, with more innovations to come in the next 12 to 24 months, which will transform the way dentists approach restorative dental treatments. Dental solutions, including dentures, crowns, and bridges, are not optional; they are essential. Our unique approach allows for monolithic prints that are ready to use right from the machine, eliminating the need for gluing or additional labor. This represents a groundbreaking advancement in denture technology. We take great pride in this transformation from prototyping to manufacturing.

My follow-up is, as you get beyond the Covestro additive manufacturing business acquisition, I guess in Q2. How are you thinking about M&A just in light in the current economic environment?

I think it's an opportunity to be honest, because we worked really hard over the last, and really I need to thank my teams all over the globe. But we built very strong foundations and foundations are what makes the difference now in tough times. So we invested in material, we invested in workflow, in pre-processing, in post-processing. We are investing in software. We can elaborate on it later on. But this infrastructure, what we call the platform for profitable growth, puts us in a very good position in the industry to be part of any M&A activity. We are very attractive as someone that can take many companies to the global market and in a structured way create profitable growth.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Brian Drab from William Blair. Your line is now live.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. I was wondering if you could talk about what you've seen in terms of equipment utilization, maybe through the lens of consumables growth or decline as you moved through 2022. And just wondering if that that's begun to soften given some of the macro challenges?

Thanks, Brian. As we explained earlier on the call, if you look at our actual 2022 numbers, our recurring revenue, which includes consumables and services, saw consumables grow by 7.7% in 2022 compared to 2021 when adjusted for foreign exchange and the MakerBot divestment. Services also experienced double-digit growth when excluding MakerBot and foreign exchange. We are very proud of this journey and the results from 2022. Looking ahead to 2023, with the addition of Covestro to our consumables offering and an increased installed base for our new platform, we are excited and confident in our ability to further grow this recurring revenue business.

Okay, thanks. I did see that information in the slides. Just to be clear, I don't know if you want to answer this directly, but what I'm trying to see is, I mean because consumables growth was 7% for the year, 4% for the fourth quarter. I'm just wondering what you saw from really from the third quarter to the fourth quarter sequentially consumables dollars. Were they up or down? Thanks a lot.

So Q3, if the question is Q3 versus Q4, the picture in Q4 is actually better than the picture in Q3. As far as concerned with the results in 2022, and we believe that the 2023 quarter will show further improvement again, due to the addition of Covestro, but also due to the installed base that we created for the new platforms: Origin, SaaS and RPS.

Hey gentlemen, congrats on the nice results and profitability this quarter.

Thank you.

Thanks Troy.

You're very welcome. So, Eitan, maybe start with you first, Covestro, we've talked about a few times on the call. I just want to confirm that the guidance doesn't include anything from that acquisition until it closes. And then you can, can you remind us what contribution it will have for '23?

Thanks, Troy for the question. So, it's actually a very good question and to clarify for everyone. So we anticipate Covestro to close during Q2 as Yoav mentioned earlier, Covestro historically had roughly $20 million in revenue annualized. So we actually anticipate between $10 million to $15 million of contribution from Covestro. It is reflected in our numbers, in particular in the high-end. So that's something that is good for clarification for the entire group here.

And you have said historically it's instantly accretive right to both margins and profitability?

Correct.

All right, perfect. And how about, you had my follow-up. It was probably a year or so, maybe a year and a half ago, you guys started talking about Open Materials. And I know it's going to be a while before you launch, but for some reason I thought it would've been the second half of last year that you guys launched Open Materials. So I'm curious if you've seen traction with it. And I guess I'm specifically thinking about FDM and Origin?

So we launched it on the F450 and at the end of last year, and practically we are supplying starting to supply now. And on the F450 we see that many of high-end manufacturing players are highly interested in this, because it's completely changed the way they look at additive manufacturing. It's not anymore a closed system where they don't have flexibility. They are willing to pay more because we are charging for the open material license. You have to buy the license, but they are willing to pay more. And we are shifting revenues from the material to the software, but we open up new applications for our customers because they can develop by themselves new materials. They have now a much broader portfolio of materials just below peers batch of new material is eight new materials. It will take us almost four years to develop those eight materials, and we did it in one shot. So, great attraction and I'm very optimistic about this.

Awesome. All right guys, well keep up the good work.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Shannon Cross from Credit Suisse. Your line is now live.

Thank you very much. I was just wondering if you could go into a bit more detail on your increased OpEx and like what is driving the decision to spend more, where are you spending it at and how should we think about the opportunity for that to drive increased revenue in coming years? And then I have a follow-up. Thank you.

Hi, Shannon. Let me really start with the actual of 2022 and then touch on the 2023 OpEx. So when you look for the full-year of 2022, we increased revenue by $44 million with an incremental OpEx of only $6.5 million, which reflects 15% of OpEx as a percentage of revenue for the full-year of 2022. That's something that is part of our scale. That's something that is part of our plan and that's basically our ability to leverage our existing infrastructure with the new businesses that we acquired over the last few years. Now, when you look at our guidance in particular on our high-end, and maybe if you do the mid-range of the guidance, we actually show on the high-end $670 million of revenue with $300 million of OpEx. When you look at this ratio, that's actually an improvement compared to 2022. And when you do the same exercise with the midrange with 645, you actually also see an improvement of OpEx as a percentage of revenue. So we continue with the same journey. We continue with our ability to scale our business. We do take into account certain elements that are beyond our control. For example, FX impact can negatively affect our OpEx. So that's something that could actually be even better if FX stabilized during the year. But overall, as I mentioned, OpEx is actually improving also in 2023.

Okay, thank you. And then, can you talk about working capital and inventory? Just how you're thinking about that as you do grow your business, obviously, you'll need incremental working capital, but then on the other side, maybe there's some room for optimization of inventory? Thanks.

Yes. So, thanks Shannon. We're actually reaching inventory levels that can support our business, our growth going forward. Those inventory levels also help us to improve our gross margin levels. It helped us shift to sea freight versus air freight, which is favorable to our gross margin, and that's something that will also serve us in the next few quarters. But we're reaching a point that it is normalized. It is in the level that will serve our business in the future. And that's why we have confidence in our ability to generate operating cash flow in 2023 due to that fact also.

Thank you. My final question is about the current competitive landscape. There has been some pressure from the end market due to macroeconomic factors, and several competitors are facing challenges related to liquidity, share prices, and the maturity of their business models. Can you share your observations regarding RFPs, pricing, and your competitive positioning? Thank you.

Yes, it's definitely challenging times for everyone, but it's also an opportunity for us because we are shining in those times. It happened to us also during the COVID period. It happens to us also now when we are competing. So someone is putting its future in the hands of a company. He would like to see a company like Stratasys, a large player, profitable for six consecutive quarters and a tech leader. As I said, we are in five technologies in two, and number one in the other three, we are in the second or third position. We are leading the vertical. For example, if we go for an RFP in aerospace, we have a proven track record of execution, which is highly appreciated by our customers. We have number one service in the industry, and this is not me judging it, it's based on NPS scores and surveys and our customers see that we are walking our talk. And when I'm in front of the customer and I'm promising a superior application fit and that I can solve your problem, they genuinely believe me because I'm not selling them something. I have the whole five technologies and I'm solving their problem on the spot with the best of everything in the industry, the best go-to-market, and with the full solution. And no one has a better material portfolio than us, especially after Covestro. So all this hard work of building those platforms is great for our reputation and puts us in a really good place. Good things are happening at Stratasys, and our customers observe it.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Ananda Baruah from Loop Capital. Your line is now live.

Hey guys, appreciate it. Thanks for taking the questions. Yes, a couple quick ones, if I could. How do you guys think about long-term revenue growth, if even just contextually, given that you're putting up pretty attractive revenue growth, call it mid-to-high-single-digits, kind of with macro challenges, and you have all the new opportunities in front of you, including growing manufacturing as the percentage of sales? And then I have a quick follow-up. Thanks.

Thank you. So we work really in tranches for the last three years to build the platform for profitable growth. So the moment the trigger will be released in terms of the macro challenges, we are positioned to capture significant growth because we have the growth drivers in this, we have the five technologies, the Origin, the SaaS, the RPS, the quality that is going for end-use parts like dental and the FDM mainly aerospace and automotive. So this is a very strong growth driver. The hardware leadership that we have, and you can see it in our hardware share quarter-over-quarter in every market research. Then we have the materials which are critical for growth and the software that we really build something unique based on our large, actually the largest installed base in the industry. And we are leveraging this installed base to bring a fantastic solution to our customers, and they are willing to pay for it. And we see it in their open material licenses that we started to sell. So the growth drivers are in place, the position in the vertical is in place, which creates for us the confidence that we can govern the business in the next three to five years.

And that maybe answers my next question, which was I was going to ask you not as a commitment or a guide, but just philosophically, do you think there's an opportunity over time that normalize the company could be a 15% to 20% organic revenue grower?

I think if you take what I said and calculate your order.

Appreciate it guys.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Noelle Dilts from Stifel. Your line is now live.

Hi, thanks so much. And congrats on the good quarter. I was hoping you could expand on some of your software initiatives, and how you're thinking about the contribution from software over in 2023 and beyond? Thanks.

Thank you for the question. When we analyze the different segments in additive manufacturing, it is clear that software presents significant opportunities and a high growth rate. Our unique strategy focuses on utilizing our strong position and large, connected install base. This is crucial for scaling manufacturing. We aim to provide our customers with access to our living operating system, GrabCAD, which we have developed into a platform. This platform not only connects to our printers but may also connect to others in the future, thanks to our SDKs and APIs. Additionally, the platform is open to various partners, allowing them to operate within a single system across five technologies instead of using multiple software solutions. They can manage their digital thread effectively on our platform, which they are willing to pay for. We offer two different services: one for 3D capabilities and others for specific features, which we will charge for. This will add to our already strong recurring revenues from services and materials, making for a great contribution. We will share more details about our expectations at the appropriate time.

Great. Thank you. And then you've touched on this in some of the comments but just I guess maybe trying to get a little bit more granular. When you look at your 2023 revenue guidance and sort of the organic element of that, is there a way to kind of think about how you're thinking about like base market growth versus maybe what you would think about as share gain or growth that's coming from that expanded addressable market that you're going to have following the recent acquisitions and when you close Covestro? Thanks.

So I will divide my answer into two. One, we are growing across all technologies. This is amazing. So in 2022, all our technologies grew one by one, and that creates a lot of confidence with us. So we are not bleeding on any technology, which was not the case in the past. And we have quite good visibility in the future because we have those road drivers that I already mentioned. And when I'm looking forward, first we have the three new technologies that almost triple our addressable market. And we know exactly what is the share that we are expecting to gain there. And our go-to-market, our sales guys and our partners' sales reps know exactly where and what they need to achieve. Of course, it's given a ramp-up. So this is a huge step for us to grow. On top of it, what we are doing is that for each one of the technologies, we are developing an end-to-end solution for specific applications. Take for example, the dentures. Take for example, and this is just the first, the product that we launched now is only the first step, more to come in the next 12 to 24 months. So the application itself is a growth driver for us. Take for example, even the fashion, really great attraction from the market, the high-end fashion market, and we have more applications like those. We took and analyzed 186 applications and we prioritized them and we go one by one to deliver those solutions across the five technologies. So there is like the direct selling more machines because we are not there, and then there is the full solution that only Stratasys can deliver. We are very optimistic on this one as well.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Jared Maymon from Berenberg. Your line is now live.

Hey guys, we've kind of touched on this in the past, but I just wanted to ask about it again since we're a quarter closer to it becoming a real opportunity. But just on dentures. So you guys are obviously talking about this. Some of your competitors are increasingly talking about it. I think you'd be crazy not to given the order of magnitude of the opportunity sounds on par or maybe even better than things that have been great demand generators for additive like aligners and hearing aids. So I'm just curious from your perspective, what are you guys seeing on number of customers that you think there are to address in concentration, I guess where you think the big opportunities are for you geographically? And then lastly, what's kind of left on the development side before you can go out and start to show some of the customers what you're capable of and generate some meaningful revenues from that market?

Dentures represent a significant opportunity, exceeding $5 billion, and I believe this figure applies only to the U.S. This opportunity pertains solely to dentures, excluding crowns and bridges. Additionally, the broader potential for our technology is nearly $50 billion. We are providing substantial value to dentists and dental labs by significantly reducing the number of patient visits and the time and effort required to produce dentures. Currently, digital dentures account for approximately 5% of the total market. If we multiply that 5% by $5 billion and consider the European market, you'll see developments in the next 12 to 24 months, as we work through FDA approval, which we intend to use for marketing purposes. We've produced videos showcasing our new dentures compared to traditional ones, which are heavier and can cause friction-related problems. Our new dentures offer a perfect fit due to our scanning technology, and replacing them is straightforward. This is a truly disruptive change in the market. No one else possesses our PolyJet technology or the capability to produce end-use parts on a PolyJet machine like we can, thanks to our exceptional teams. They have achieved milestones that others in our industry haven't reached. We continue developing our TrueDent resins, and we aim to lead the market for non-discretionary end-use parts in dentures. We have the technology to make people happier and help them smile, and we are committed to doing just that.

Yes, that's great. And then just to clarify on that, so I guess when you look at kind of concentration or Stratasys' strategy of addressing this market. Do you guys look at this like you want to become the supplier of choice for a few big customers that you look at as clear targets that can drive a lot of volume? Or is this more of a spread approach of build the technology and let the demand come from a big base of customers?

We are going in a few different channels. Of course, I'm not going to elaborate here, but we are going through different channels to the market. And for us, the most important thing that as many people as possible will be able to enjoy and not only in the developed world but also in the developing world, because we dramatically also reduce the cost for dentures.

Got it. Thanks. And then just one follow-up on the EBITDA margin target. So you guys mentioned that 13% to 15% as what you think the business is kind of capable of on EBITDA. So I'm just curious, if we look back at the additive industry as a whole, since 2014 and even before that as well, getting a good gauge of kind of normalized profitability has been a real challenge. So I'm just wondering, are you guys this 13% to 15% targeted? Are you guys looking at this as like an out-year estimate and you have a time in mind where you can hit that or do you think that's a good way to look at the industry and perpetuity in 13% to 15% is what makes sense for additive long-term?

Thanks, Jared, for the question. This target is a mid-term target, so probably two to three years to reach the double-digit operating income and 13% to 15% EBITDA. That's definitely not the end state. We believe that we can continue to grow the business and grow profitability beyond that target as we continue with our journey and our scale.

Perfect. Thanks guys. And congrats on a nice quarter.

Thank you.

Thank you. We've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any further or closing comments.

Thank you for joining us. Looking forward to updating you again next quarter.

Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.