Greetings. Welcome to Tenable’s First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Erin Karney, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may now begin.

Thank you, operator and thank you all for joining us on today's conference call to discuss Tenable's first quarter 2023 financial results. With me on the call today are Amit Yoran, our Chief Executive Officer; and Steve Vintz, our Chief Financial Officer. Prior to this call, we issued a press release announcing our financial results for the quarter. You can find the press release on the IR website at tenable.com. Before we begin, let me remind you that we will make forward-looking statements during the course of this call, including statements relating to our guidance and expectations for the second quarter and full-year 2023, growth and drivers in our business, changes in the threat landscape in the security industry and our competitive position in the market, growth in our customer demand for and adoption of our solutions, planned innovation and new products and services, and our expectations regarding long-term profitability and free cash flow. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as a prediction of future events. Forward-looking statements represent our management's beliefs and assumptions only as of today and should not be considered representative of our views as of any subsequent date. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or outlook. For a further discussion of the material risks and other important factors that could affect our actual results, please refer to those contained in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports that we file with the SEC, which are available on the SEC website at sec.gov. In addition, during today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are in addition to and not a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of these non-GAAP financial measures versus their closest GAAP equivalents. Our earnings release that we issued today includes GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations for these measures and is also available on the Investor Relations section of our website. I’ll now turn the call over to Amit.

Today, I'll provide some financial highlights on the quarter, discuss the current state of the market, and our momentum with Tenable One. We delivered strong revenue, operating income, and cash flow during the quarter. This is particularly notable given the macro headwinds we experienced at the end of March. Based on conversations with customers, we are confident that cybersecurity and specifically cyber exposure management remains a top strategic focus for organizations globally. While we experienced some challenges in the quarter, we saw some incredibly positive signs for our business. Let me start by making a few comments about the broader market, which impacted current calculated billings. Some of the macro conditions we've been discussing, such as back-loaded quarters, longer sales cycles, and more scrutiny of large deals, particularly new business, continued during the quarter. The last two weeks of March exacerbated these conditions as the banking crisis came to light. Specifically, we saw longer lead times in purchasing and approval phases of our sales cycle in the first quarter versus what we had typically experienced. As a direct result, a number of highly qualified committed deals pushed out of the quarter, which is reflected in our net new enterprise and our six-figure ads. Of the deals pushed, many were in banking and financial services, technology, and telecom, traditionally strong sectors for Tenable. We expect these macro factors to continue to have an impact this year. As we navigate the current macro environment, there are two points that are important to note. The first is that demand remains strong. New pipeline generation added during the quarter exceeded our expectations and was a record for Tenable. Customers clearly want to understand and reduce their risk, and they're increasingly using Tenable One as the platform of choice to do so. The second is that we believe our competitive dynamics have never been more favorable. We're getting tech evaluation wins at a much faster rate. In fact, the lead to tech win phase of our sales cycle in the quarter was approximately 10% shorter than the same quarter last year, which was also aided by Log4j. In this market, more enterprises are specifically looking to consolidate their investments with the platform-first approach to cybersecurity. This trend is good news for us and one that we intend to use to our full advantage. Tenable One enables our customers to achieve a greater return on their cybersecurity investment while also providing the preventative security they desperately need. Tenable One continues to be an exciting area of growth for us and represents a mid-teens percentage of new business and a high single-digit percentage of our overall business. It's also noteworthy that within Tenable One, we continue to see a shift in the allocation of licenses beyond vulnerability management. Cloud and analytics are key areas of growth with existing customers, validating our investments to unify cloud security posture and vulnerability management, as well as our analytics-led approach to Exposure Management. The strength we're seeing in Tenable One is a direct result of our pursuit to operationalize preventative security, which has been a driving force for our roadmap. While reactive cybersecurity is necessary, it does little to nothing to address the root causes of a majority of breaches, known vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations. We are leading the industry to change the way it thinks about managing risk. With Exposure Management capabilities of Tenable One, organizations are rethinking their approach to risk, leveraging vulnerability and risk data to proactively unearth weaknesses and prioritize vulnerability remediation. And as I mentioned, we're getting tech wins faster. We believe the speed of our wins reflects a combination of our position as a technology leader, our reputation as a company, and the superiority of our Exposure Management platform. There's no doubt that security teams need to do more with less and are choosing to do so with a partner they trust. We're committed to delivering more for our customers. And we're updating Tenable One to support on-premise and hybrid environments via integration with Tenable Security Center. This enables tens of thousands of organizations and customers with regulatory and data privacy requirements to access Tenable One’s features such as risk analytics, attack path analytics, benchmarking, and asset inventory. Tenable One streamlines Exposure Management for hybrid vulnerability management deployments and may help on-prem customers transition to the cloud more quickly. Customers want to understand exposures and manage risk. Tenable One provides a means to consistently enforce cloud security posture and compliance across multi-cloud and hybrid environments through a single unified platform. Our solution is more cost-effective and scalable than using one-off or siloed tools. While we are navigating some near-term macro headwinds which have led us to revise our top-line guidance, we have a lot to be excited about. We have an industry-leading technology and are expanding successfully to a platform, enabling our customers to consolidate vendors and increase operating efficiency, both of which are critical in this environment. We are building strong demand at the top end of the funnel, we're changing tech wins faster, and we believe we've never been better positioned competitively. In short, I believe that Tenable is well-positioned strategically for long-term success and could not be more excited about our future. Additionally, we remain committed to delivering on the operating and unlevered free cash flow commitments we made at the beginning of the year. We look forward to updating you as the year progresses. I'll now turn the call over to Steve for further commentary on our financial results and outlook.

Thanks, Amit. Our ability to deliver better-than-expected profitability in the quarter due to stronger operating efficiency is certainly a notable accomplishment in this market. I will provide more commentary momentarily. But first, please note that all financial results we discuss today are non-GAAP financial measures with the exception of revenue. As Erin mentioned at the start of this call, GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations may be found in our earnings release issued earlier today, which is posted on our website. Now, on to our results for the quarter. Calculated current billings, defined as the change in current deferred revenue plus revenue recognized in the quarter, grew 13% year-over-year to $176.8 million. As Amit discussed earlier, we experienced a more challenging selling environment in Q1, most notably during the final two weeks of the quarter, which historically is our busiest time. This resulted in a higher percentage of large deals both in terms of new lands and expansion opportunities that pushed out of the quarter, particularly in North America and specifically in the banking and financial services and the technology and telecom sectors. It's important to note that banking and financial services and technology and telecom are frequently areas of strength for us, given the sophisticated nature of these customers from a cyber perspective and their propensity to transact larger deals. Despite the environment, demand remained strong and exceeded our expectations as we generated more pipe during the quarter than any other time in our company's history. In terms of key financial metrics, we added 379 new enterprise platform customers and 24 net new six-figure customers in Q1. Our dollar-based net expansion rate was 113% in the quarter. As a reminder, the expansion rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis. Gross retention is worth noting was strong in the quarter. Revenue was $188.8 million, which represents 18% year-over-year growth. Revenue in the quarter exceeded the midpoint of our guided range by $1.8 million. Our percentage of recurring revenue remains high and was 95% this quarter, which is consistent with prior periods. I'll now turn to expenses where we are demonstrating good cost control and operating leverage. I'll start with gross margin, which was 79% this quarter and up from 78% last quarter. We are pleased to see our gross margin expand over the prior quarter, primarily due to our ability to cost-effectively provision and manage public cloud infrastructure as we absorb the initial costs related to our newer exposure management offerings. Sales and marketing expense was $82.8 million, which was up from $78.3 million last quarter. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue was 44%, compared to 42% last quarter. Sales and marketing expense increased primarily due to the incremental costs associated with resuming our annual in-person sales kickoff, higher wages attributed to hiring additional sales personnel and quota-carrying sales reps, offset by lower commissions expense due to our large renewal base in Q4. R&D expense was $29.3 million, which was up from $28.7 million last quarter. R&D expense as a percentage of revenue was 16% this quarter and last quarter. R&D expense increased sequentially due to additional personnel costs, primarily payroll taxes and benefits, and investments in software development and associated cloud resources. G&A expense was $18.8 million, which was up from $17.9 million last quarter, primarily due to higher wages and payroll taxes, as well as higher IT and professional fees to support our continued growth. As a percentage of revenue, G&A expense was 10% this quarter, consistent with last quarter. Income from operations was $18.1 million, which is very notably above the midpoint of our guided range by $8.6 million. Operating margin for the quarter was 10%, which was 500 basis points better than the midpoint of our guidance. The takeaway here is, even in a dynamic environment, we've been able to expand our operating margin as we scale our business by leveraging our VM market leadership, sizable customer base, and broad exposure management platform. All of this resulted in earnings per share in the first quarter of $0.11, which was $0.85 better than the midpoint of our guided range. Now, let's turn to the balance sheet. We finished the quarter with $616.7 million in cash and short-term investments. Accounts receivable was $123.9 million, and total deferred revenue was $642.1 million, including $490.1 million of current deferred revenue, which gives us a lot of visibility into revenue over the next 12 months. We generated $44.2 million of unlevered free cash flow during the quarter, which is up from $32.1 million last quarter. With 95% recurring revenue, high gross margins, and high renewal rates, we feel confident that we can continue to expand our operating and free cash flow margins over the ensuing years. With the results of the quarter behind us, I'd like to discuss our outlook for the second quarter and full-year 2023. For the second quarter, we currently expect revenue to be in the range of $189 million to $191 million, non-GAAP income from operations to be in the range of $20 million to $21 million, non-GAAP net income to be in the range of $15 million to $16 million, assuming interest expense of $7.7 million, interest income of $5.2 million, and a provision for income taxes of $2.4 million. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $0.12 to $0.13, assuming $120.5 million fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding. And for the full year, we currently expect calculated current billings to be in the range of $875 million to $885 million, revenue to be in the range of $775 million to $785 million. Non-GAAP income from operations to be in the range of $90 million to $95 million, non-GAAP net income to be in the range of $69 million to $74 million, assuming interest expense of $31.6 million, interest income of $20.8 million, and a provision for income taxes of $9.9 million. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to be in the range of $0.57 to $0.61, assuming $121.5 million fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding and unlevered free cash flow to be in the range of $175 million to $180 million. There are a few comments I want to make that will provide important context to our guidance today. First, our annual CCB guide reflects a continuation of the selling environment that we experienced at the end of March. While in April, we closed a number of the deals that pushed out of Q1 and demand generation was strong in the quarter, our guidance assumes that new business will take longer to close over the remainder of the year in light of the macro. Our annual CCB guide also reflects a slightly shorter contract duration, which is what we experienced in Q1. In terms of quarterly flow, we expect Q2 to be slightly lower than the 13% to 14% CCB growth expected for the full year. Our revenue guidance also reflects the impact of all these factors. In terms of profitability, we are very pleased to raise our full-year outlook for operating income given our outperformance in the first quarter and our confidence to drive continued leverage in the business. Recall, in February, we laid out a plan to invest more aggressively this year in go-to-market. And it's worth noting that we were able to execute on some of that hiring in Q1. That said, our guidance calls for more select investment across the business for the remainder of the year. In addition, our outlook reflects lower variable costs that drop directly to the bottom line based on our revised top-line guidance. We are mindful of the macro which is very fluid and highly dynamic. So, we expect to remain agile, and we'll reevaluate the ROI of future spend as we continuously strike the right balance between growth and profitability. It's also important to note that we were able to reiterate our annual guide for unlevered free cash flow today based on the strength of our guide for full-year operating income. At this point, I'd like to turn the call back over to Amit for some closing comments.

Thanks, Steve. This is indeed a very fluid environment, but we are well-positioned strategically to help our customers solve their most important cyber challenges. We have a ton of opportunity ahead of us and look forward to updating you throughout the year. We hope to see many of you at the JPMorgan conference in the upcoming weeks. We now like to open the call up for questions.

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Rob Owens with Piper Sandler. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Good afternoon. Could you guys specifically speak to the weakness that you're seeing in the tech and telecom vertical? Anything headcount related or some of the reasoning behind the pushed deals? And then, I guess, in addition, steps that you guys are taking from a pipeline management perspective to shepherd deals across the line? Thanks.

I don't think that we've looked at any of the changes in sales cycle as related specifically to headcount in tech and telecom, although I do acknowledge that maybe there has been some impact from that. From our perspective, it was much more of a procurement process than it was a headcount or a number of asset types issue. We saw very healthy demand in the top-end funnel, with a lot of demand generation activities. We actually saw faster lead to technical win by about 10% faster than we have in previous periods. So, from our perspective, there was more of a deal delay in the final phase, waiting for negotiation and final approval from the finance team. So, I think that's how I would characterize the change in buying behaviors. And internally, we're doing a number of things with the sales team and go-to-market functions to ensure that we've got greater visibility across the board in terms of looking above and beyond just approval from the Exposure Management and risk management teams, and gaining much more visibility into the financial side of deal closure.

Our next question comes from the line of Joel Fishbein with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks for taking my question. Amit, I guess one quick one for you and a quick follow-up for Steve. Just I'm curious, you talked a little bit about the Tenable One getting some traction. I really want to understand what the buyer reaction is to that in terms of pricing and how that has flowed through if pricing is stable? And maybe you could talk about, and give an example or two of some customers that have adopted Tenable One.

Yes. I think we're super excited about Tenable One. Every data point that we've seen shows us that we're achieving faster sales cycles, and we're achieving higher average selling prices (ASPs). From our customer perspective, we're seeing them allocate more of their licenses toward things above and beyond vulnerability management. So, looking at cloud security, identity, and other aspects of their attack surface. So from our perspective, faster sales cycles, larger ASPs have the potential to deliver better and more compelling analytics. And from a customer perspective, yes, they're paying more, but they're actually able to do some vendor consolidation and reduce costs. So, if you look at Tenable for vulnerability management and some other solutions for securing identities or helping with cloud security— that combination can end up being more expensive than allowing Tenable to deliver on all those capabilities through a unified platform, which helps save on license costs and ultimately helps you operationalize these security activities through integrated APIs and streamlined operations with fewer interfaces and the like.

Okay. And Steve, real quick, just as a follow-up. You sort of reiterated the unlevered free cash flow for 2023. So, can we assume that the unlevered free cash flow of 2024 for $240 million to $250 million is still intact?

Hey Joel, this is Steve. We'll talk about 2024 in February of next year, but what I will say is, notwithstanding the current macro, nothing has changed here in our business. We're excited about the opportunity. We're committed to the cash flow targets that we said at the beginning of the year. So, we're reaffirming operating income and free cash flow, and we're happy to talk more about free cash flow in 2024 in February of next year.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Essex with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good afternoon and thank you for taking the question. Maybe if I could follow up to Rob's question a little bit. Could you speak to the weakness in the financial services vertical with regard to the size of the enterprises? And then was there any specific focus in terms of the breadth of the deals. So are these, for example, Tenable One deals where you had a lot of greater attach rates and there were maybe more dollars at stake. Maybe just a little color there would be helpful?

Yes. I think with respect to the banking and financial services sector, we saw—as we said in the elongation of the deal approvals in the finance team at the very end of the sales cycle, it was certainly more toward the midsized and regional banks, and I'd say also more heavily weighted in North America than in any other geographic location.

Brian, this is Steve. I would just say that what we saw in the last weeks of the quarter was more broadly across the board. Obviously, we talked about a greater percentage of pushed deals in banking and financial services in tech and telecom and specifically in North America. Those two sectors are pretty sizable for us and can represent approximately 30% of our total sales. Historically, those sectors have been very strong, and they also tend to skew towards larger transactions, irrespective of whether they're technical difficulty or even a regional bank here. For us, we're seeing a lot of positive signs in the quarter, but we believe these are short-term headwinds that we're working to overcome and feel good about the outlook that we're giving regarding profitability and cash flows. The good news is that we made a fair investment starting out in the first quarter, and our expectation is that this is a good step for success for the remainder of the year.

Our next question comes from the line of Hamza Fodderwala with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Good afternoon and thank you for taking my question. So, if I get this straight, the last two weeks of the quarter were not great and it seems like a lot of that was due to the financial services sector. Has there been anything in the month of April to suggest to you that it was, in fact, a pause from some of your banking customers as opposed to perhaps another leg down for Q2 versus Q1?

Hi Hamza, this is Steve. Well, April was strong for us. We're tracking to our revised outlook. We're encouraged by some of the data that we're seeing in April. As I talked about earlier, we closed some of the deals that pushed out of Q1 in April. That said, the last month of the quarter is always our busiest, so June will certainly be determined here, but we started off strongly, and all this is factored into our outlook for the year.

Got it. So, it sounds like it's too early to tell. And then just roughly, could you help us size what the banking and financial services revenue exposure for Tenable? I know there's a lot that goes into financial services like different sectors. But just roughly how big that is for you guys?

Yes, not surprisingly, banking and financial services, along with tech and telecom, are some of the more sophisticated industries in terms of cybersecurity. Collectively, those represent about 30% of the overall business on a global basis.

Our next question comes from the line of Saket Kalia with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking my questions here. Amit, maybe for you, just to change it up a little bit on verticals, I was wondering if you could just talk a little bit about the federal business. How did that do here in the March quarter? And how does, sort of, the pipeline look for the rest of the year?

Yes. We actually saw a reasonably strong quarter for our public sector business, including federal, and maybe even more so on the state and local side, and we anticipate that to be a strong sector for us throughout the remainder of the year.

Got it. Got it. And Steve, maybe for you. You talked about perhaps seeing slightly shorter contract durations, but you're still able to reiterate the unlevered free cash flow guide, so kudos. Just maybe help us think about some of the puts and takes there.

Yes, sure. Well, we talked about how our calculated current billings reflect a continuation of the selling environment we experienced in Q1. We are assuming that new business, albeit from new logos or even upsell, will take longer to close for the remainder of the year. So, we're modeling in lower conversion rates and even lower net dollar expansion rates than what we were expecting on our last call in February. And we think this is prudent to do so based on what we saw in the last couple of weeks. Our guidance does reflect a slightly shorter contract duration due to fewer than expected multi-year prepaid deals. That said, the top performance is strong. We're reaching tech lines much faster, qualifying these opportunities, and working closely with our prospects and partners.

Great, thanks very much. Steve, sorry if I missed this. But on the quarter capacity, do you still expect 2023 to be larger from an ad perspective than 2022?

We are, as we mentioned, some of the moderation in investment also impacts quarter capacity. So our focus here— we added good quarter capacity in Q1. Our focus here is, in the short term, going to be on achieving higher levels of productivity. Our expectation is that the investment we contemplated across the board for the business at the onset of the year, specifically in sales, will be more moderate going forward than what we discussed on our February call.

No, I don't think we have to wait for calculated current billings to reaccelerate before doing M&A transactions. We're looking at it – and in this market, especially where we anticipate a lot of companies struggling, both from a sales perspective, as well as from a cost of capital perspective, we do expect opportunities to make themselves available for M&A that would not be available in other markets, and we want to take advantage of that.

Perfect. Thanks very much.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Cikos with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your question.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking the questions here. I wanted to circle back. I know that we're talking about the moderation in investments to help you guys preserve that unlevered free cash flow guidance we have for the year. If we're moderating on the hiring side for quota-carrying reps or the sales and marketing more broadly, beyond those hires, are there other areas where the company is looking to either become more efficient or to reduce some of those variable expenses that you guys were initially looking to invest in? Can you give us some more concrete examples as far as where those savings are coming from?

Yes. I guess I'd start by saying we did a tremendous amount of hiring in Q1 and believe that we have both the quarter capacity as well as the headcount necessary to drive the results that we provided through the remainder of the year. What is contemplated is that we will be moderating the pace of new and additional investments throughout the year while we're seeing these longer sales cycles and changes in the sales process, and that enables us to deliver on the free cash flow commitments that we've made.

Understood. And I guess for the follow-up here, I know Tenable One continues to be something that you guys are highlighting. Can you give us a better sense, I guess, excluding some of the commentary that we have around those more difficult weeks in March, but where are you seeing the greatest success with Tenable One? Is it with existing customers? Is it with landing new customers? Is it vertical specific? Any sense there would be helpful.

Yes. I think, not surprisingly, the greatest momentum is occurring with existing customers where they're already leveraging us for vulnerability management, and this becomes an easy on-ramp to broadening their understanding of cyber exposure. In this market, we do anticipate new customer acquisition to be more difficult than it has been in previous periods. So, we do land new logos, and we think there's competitive differentiation with Tenable One, but we believe, given the size of our customer base, the sales motion, and the market that we're operating in, that we expect to see a lot of those sales coming from the existing customer base.

Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Nowinski with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Okay. Thank you. Good afternoon. So, you guys play across a number of different market segments, including identity, cloud, VM app security, etc. Just wondering if you saw a change in sales cycles across all those different product segments or was it more concentrated in maybe one?

No. We saw the change in buying behavior occur across all product segments. It was more heavily weighted to, again, the financial services, banking, telecom, and technology sectors and more heavily weighted in North America than in other regions. But it wasn't specific or weighted in any one product here—it’s pretty much across all of them.

Okay. Got it. And then I wanted to ask a follow-up question on your comments about Tenable One being updated for on-prem and hybrid. I was wondering, do you still get the 70% price uplift with that form factor? And are there any revenue recognition differences between the two when you sell it as an on-prem solution?

Yes. We have not—yes, I can't comment to the actual price uplift because we're only now—we're certainly going to be introducing the hybrid with on-prem capabilities for Tenable One. From a revenue recognition perspective, being separate purchases, I don't know if there's anything...

Yes, there's no change in revenue recognition even when we sell an on-prem. Almost all the time, it's subscription and to a recurring revenue model, and it will continue to be that way.

Our next question comes from the line of Joshua Tilton with Wolfe Research. Please proceed with your question.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I have two actually. From my understanding, the initial guidance for 1Q and the full-year did assume that things got worse in the macro environment, and I guess that was before the SVB fallout. So, I guess my question is, excluding the weakness in Banking and Financial Services, was the rest of the business materially worse than the weakness you'd already baked into the guide? And my second question is, you said that the guidance assumes that new business remains pressured for the rest of the year, are you assuming this for just the verticals that you saw weakness in this quarter? Or are you assuming this for all the verticals that you sell to?

Yes. I guess the way I would answer that is, we saw a particular impact in the sectors that we had mentioned earlier. But we believe that the challenges experienced in the financial services sector do have some impact into other companies and other sectors as well. So, what we're modeling in is really more of the same or those challenges that we saw at the very end of Q1 occurring and playing themselves out for the remainder of the year. Our outlook actually reflects lower achievement rates and lower net dollar expansion rates. We think that's the right thing to do. And again, what we saw some of these headwinds in the last two weeks of the quarter, which are typically their busiest time, so we're translating that out over the rest of the year and taking a more cautious outlook.

And just—Steve, is that lower net dollar expansion rate that you're assuming? Is that lower than what you saw this quarter or is that lower than the midpoint of your expected range that you've previously communicated to us?

Our guidance reflects a lower net dollar expansion rate for the rest of the year than what we experienced. And keep in mind, too, that the net dollar expansion rate can vary from quarter-to-quarter, but if you look at the comparison last year in Q1, it was exceptional, one of our strongest due to Log4j. So, our outlook reflects moderating net dollar expansion rates due to some of the factors that we experienced in the last couple of weeks of Q1. We think this is the right approach.

Our next question comes from the line of Shebly Seyrafi with FBN Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you very much. Related to the last question, the net expansion rate did decline by 4 points from 117% to 113%, and you expect another decline. How confident are you that it won't undercut the low-end of the range of which is 110% going forward?

Yes. Well, we—instead of providing we historically used to provide the range, saying that we expect the net dollar expansion rate to be between 110% and 120%. That's why we were not disclosing the net dollar expansion rate. Now, every quarter, we're one of the few companies that do this. We disclose the exact net dollar expansion rate. It's important to note that the pipeline opportunities can vary from quarter-to-quarter between new logos and expansion opportunities. We're seeing some natural variation. This quarter, we saw some moderation, and we expect it to moderate and the outlook for the full year reflects that we expect that to continue.

Okay. And my second question is, the financial services vertical; some believe that the mess in the banking sector has stabilized a bit, notwithstanding the fact that First Republic was down 20% today after the market. But there is some sense that it has stabilized. Did you see any signs of stabilization in the month of April in that sector?

I would say the good news is, we talked about this earlier that some of the deals that pushed out, we closed a good percentage of those in April. That is certainly encouraging. And we're not seeing customers cancel projects across the board. I would make that very clear. Now that said, if you look at the seasonal flows of our business and kind of the intra-quarter flow, the last month of the quarter is always expected to be our strongest. So, June will certainly be determinative, but we're very pleased with our start to the quarter and specifically what we're seeing in April. We're seeing demand remain strong, competitive differentiations, and we're getting to tech wins much faster. We think the opportunities are right in front of us.

Our next question comes from the line of Rob Owens with Piper Sandler. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Good afternoon. Could you guys specifically speak to the weakness that you're seeing in the tech and telecom vertical? Anything headcount related or some of the reasoning behind the pushed deals? And then, I guess, in addition, steps that you guys are taking from a pipeline management perspective to shepherd deals across the line? Thanks.

Thank you. There are no more questions in the queue at this time. This does conclude today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation, everyone. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day.