Thank you for standing by and welcome to the AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Review. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the remarks, there will be a question and answer session, and I will give you instructions on how to ask questions at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay on our website shortly after the conclusion of this call. I would now like to turn the conference over to the host for this call, Head of Investor Relations for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P., Mr. Ioanis Jorgali. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our third quarter 2025 earnings review. This conference call is being webcast and accompanied by a slide presentation that's posted in the Investor Relations section of our website. With us today to discuss the company's results for the quarter are Seth Perry Bernstein, President and CEO, and Thomas Rudolph Simeone, CFO. Onur Erzan, Head of Global Client Group and Private Wealth, will join us for questions after our prepared remarks. Some of the information we will present today is forward-looking and subject to certain SEC rules and regulations regarding disclosure. So I would like to point out the safe harbor language on slide two of our presentation. You can also find our safe harbor language in the MD&A of our 10-Q, which we filed this morning. We base our distribution to unitholders on our adjusted results, which we provide in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Our standard GAAP reporting and reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted results are in our presentation, appendix, press release, and our 10-Q. Under regulation FD, management may only address questions of material nature from the investment community in a public forum. So please ask all such questions during this call. Now, I'll turn it over to Seth.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. I am delighted to update you on our progress against our goals for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P., harnessing our diversified investment expertise and deep distribution capabilities. We remain steadfast in our commitment to providing better outcomes for our clients. On slide three, I will review the key business highlights of the third quarter. First, firmwide assets under management have reached a new milestone, sitting at $860 billion as of quarter-end. Bernstein Private Wealth has reached a record high of $153 billion, bolstering relationships within the ultra-high-net-worth client segment, including wealth creators, family offices, global families, and business owners. Our institutional asset management business, with $351 billion in AUM, caters to long-duration capital pools encompassing private markets, insurance, general account assets, and customized retirement plans. Our $356 billion retail platform serves robust markets like Asia Pacific and the US, offering secularly growing solutions such as SMAs, active ETFs, and model portfolios spanning a diverse asset allocation. Through scale, improved operating leverage, and a sustainable fee structure, we are driving consistent growth in revenues, earnings, and margins, capturing profitable growth aligned with market dynamics. Second, flow dynamics improved in the third quarter, excluding $4 billion of outflows related to the previously announced Equitable RGA reinsurance deal. Our firmwide net flows were $1.7 billion positive. Demand was led by two secularly growing asset classes and consistent organic growth engines for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.: tax-exempt fixed income and private alternatives. In the third quarter, we had over $4 billion tax-exempt inflows, extending our streak of positive organic growth to 11 consecutive quarters. This quarter saw accelerated inflows from both retail and private wealth. AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. is the number one retail muni SMA manager. We grew our tax-exempt platform to more than $50 billion of AUM, despite a very turbulent macro backdrop for muni bonds. Private markets generated nearly $3 billion of net inflows, reflecting an improved backdrop for commercial real estate, coupled with strong origination for investment-grade corporate and ABS private placements. While active equities shed over $6 billion, driven by growth-oriented redemptions, we're seeing inflows in structured and defensive strategies such as our global structured equities, strategic core, and US select. Additionally, thematic investments such as security of the future and our disruptors ETF ticker continue to attract strong inflows and deliver relative outperformance. Taxable outflows of approximately $4 billion were largely episodic, excluding the impact from the reinsurance transaction. Firmwide taxable flows were flat, reflecting improved retail and private wealth dynamics where we observed modest inflows. Thirdly, we continue to enhance our third-party insurance asset management business, drawing on our extensive 40-plus years of experience in managing insurance assets. We're excited to announce our new partnership with Fortitude in strategic investment in FCA Re. This represents another major milestone in our ongoing efforts to expand our leadership in global insurance asset management. Leveraging our prominent competitive position in the Asia Pacific market, we're gaining further traction as a partner of choice for insurers in the region. Looking ahead, we're eager to expand our collaboration with Fortitude through this partnership. Year to date, we've successfully onboarded seven new insurance GA relationships spanning across eight strategies. These partnerships necessitate a high-touch client service approach that goes beyond traditional asset management. We've dedicated substantial operational resources and institutional expertise to provide a comprehensive client experience that is scalable, unlocking additional revenue streams beyond management fees. Our strategic alliance with Equitable gives us a competitive advantage, reinforcing our client-centric asset-light approach by leveraging the permanent capital commitment from Equitable, we concede and scale our higher fee, longer-dated private alternative strategies. To date, we've deployed approximately $17 billion of the $20 billion capital commitment made by Equitable to our AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. private markets strategies. We see further opportunity to increase this allocation over time as Equitable continues to grow its general account assets. Skipping to slide five, I'll review our investment performance, starting with fixed income. In the US, a weakening labor market and better-than-feared inflation readings raised the possibility of rate cuts, pushing yields lower. Conversely, European and Japanese sovereign yields increased due to concerns over government stability, increased fiscal spending, and the conclusion of the European Central Bank's rate-cutting cycle. Credit markets performed well with investment-grade corporate spreads tightening and risk-on sentiment for high-yield bonds. The Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index returned 2%, while the hedge global High Yield Index returned 2.7% in the third quarter. Our one-year performance faced challenges due to selection and emerging markets, high-yield corporates, and yield curve positioning, which detracted from our returns as longer yields fluctuated, ultimately ending lower. 30% of our fixed income assets outperformed over the one-year period. Despite rates volatility, active management of duration and credit exposure has generated strong long-term returns, with 86% and 70% of AUM outperforming over the three and five-year periods, respectively. Our flagship income strategies, American Income and Global High Yield, delivered high single-digit and low double-digit returns over the three-year period, both outperforming their Morningstar categories for that period. Notably, we observed a rebound in client flows into American income, reflecting resurgent interest in duration, extension, and US dollar-denominated assets, highlighting the enduring appeal of US assets supported by attractive rate differentials and deep capital markets. Looking ahead, we maintain a positive outlook on fixed income and we stand ready to capture the next reallocation wave as bonds regain their diversification value. Credit fundamentals remain robust and monetary policy clarity increases. Turning to equities, US equity markets delivered strong returns in the third quarter of 2025, benefiting from the resilient consumer spending, benign inflation readings, and strong GDP and corporate earnings growth. The S&P 500 returned 8.1% during the quarter, reaching record highs. Small-cap stocks outperformed large caps, driving a 12.4% return for the Russell 2000 in Q3. Global developed equities posted positive returns, although they underperformed the US, while emerging markets outperformed. Signs of improving market breadth are encouraging, but it's important to note that the recent rally was primarily driven by lower quality, unprofitable, high momentum, and heavily shorted names. Given our limited exposure to these equity baskets, our relative performance was affected with 22% of assets outperforming over the one-year, 41% over the three-year, and 53% of our equity AUM outperforming over the five-year. Despite these dynamics weighing on the relative performance across the active industry, our client discussions regarding our decisions to underweight in these risk units have been positive. Our investment philosophy centered around an active approach to quality investing continues to resonate with those seeking such strategies. Finally, I want to highlight the growing interest in international equities, where we have a diverse selection of active equity strategies with strong breadth and high-quality product offerings balanced across geographies. These include our international strategic equities, international small cap, international value, emerging market strategic core, China, and emerging markets value. Next, I'll briefly cover channel highlights before doing a deeper dive into our retirement and private alternatives capabilities. Turning to slide six with our retail highlights. Despite facing channel outflows for the second consecutive quarter, we observed a notable uptick in momentum, driven primarily by active fixed income. Sentiment around taxable fixed income has improved as rates volatility stabilized. Taxable net flows rebounded slightly in the third quarter, driven by our fixed income ETF platform in the US and improving demand for our American Income product in Asia. Furthermore, our tax-exempt retail inflows reaccelerated, growing organically at an impressive 26% annualized rate. We think the bond reallocation theme has more runway, and we stand ready to assist our clients in capturing the enduring value proposition of fixed income as we effectively demonstrated in 2024. Moving on to slide seven to cover our institutional channel. Our private alternative services are experiencing significant inflows with a range of existing, adjacent, and new strategies in illiquid credit attracting substantial investments from Equitable and third-party institutions. Our pipeline AUM currently sits at around $12 billion, showcasing notable fundings in both liquid and illiquid credit as well as active and passive equities. We anticipate an additional $1.5 billion in private market AUM in the upcoming quarters, a figure not yet accounted for in our pipeline. Next, I'll move to slide eight to cover private wealth. Through a blend of flexibility, insight, and personal attention, Bernstein Private Wealth continues to gain market share in the ultra-high-net-worth channel. Our Private Wealth channel delivered strong sales and the highest inflows in ten quarters, reflecting strong advisor productivity and cross-asset client allocations. Bernstein Private Wealth represents 18% of our firmwide assets with average client tenures of more than ten years, generating approximately 36% of our firmwide revenues. Moving to slide nine, I'd like to talk about how AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. is helping clients navigate one of their most important financial objectives: retiring with confidence. The retirement landscape has evolved a lot over the years. There are fewer younger workers to care for our aging populations, and with longer lifespans, the savings challenge is even greater. The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution plans is reshaping the way people prepare for their golden years. More than ever, the burden is on individuals to save on their own and choose their own investments. Getting it wrong could leave them without a reliable income stream in retirement that DB plans once provided. Innovation has played a pivotal role in addressing the evolving trends and challenges in retirement planning. Target date funds became very popular after the passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. It was a meaningful step in improving retirement outcomes, and it relieved individuals from the burden of having to make complex asset allocation decisions that they weren't trained to do. But markets have become increasingly complex, and we did continue to innovate by customizing target date funds at the plan and participant level and incorporating a broader set of asset classes, including private assets and insurance solutions that provide guaranteed lifetime income. AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.'s custom target date business was launched in 2006. Today, about two decades later, it stands at approximately $105 billion in assets under management across 27 global clients, mostly concentrated in the US, but also with a meaningful business in the UK. We've been an industry leader for well over ten years. We've seen more custom target date searches this year, and we're pleased to have been selected recently to design and manage a custom target date solution for a large US insurance company's DC plan. It's the second mandate we've won this year. Combined, they total nearly $4 billion, and both will be implemented in 2026. Additionally, we were selected earlier this year to run a custom retirement solution for one of the largest DC master trusts in the UK, which is expected to grow to significant scale over time. In collaboration with Equitable, we were first movers in the in-plan lifetime income market. Our industry-leading lifetime income strategy, also known as LIS, manages $13.5 billion of total assets, and $5 billion of that is guaranteed by five insurance companies. LIS gives DC plan participants a personalized target date portfolio with a flexible guaranteed income adoption, addressing both their accumulation and decumulation needs. When we first launched LIS in 2020, we designed it to comply with QDIA regulations so that it could be a true default option for DC plans. Our team's foresight proved invaluable. On September 23, an advisory opinion from the US Department of Labor affirmed that DC plan sponsors can benefit from ERISA's fiduciary safe harbor when they select AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.'s LIS program. This endorsement validates our approach and offers further reassurance to plan sponsors. The guidance significantly reduces regulatory uncertainty and shields our plan sponsor clients from potential litigation risks. That empowers them to focus on what really matters: solving for the best outcome for their participants. In fact, participants in our multi-insurer secured income portfolio have both guaranteed income for life and net-of-fee returns that have exceeded the typical target date fund benchmark since inception. Our design allows us to take on higher equity exposure and has delivered returns that have offset the cost of the insurance. We continue to expand our lifetime income platform to provide choice to plan sponsors. This includes the option to add lifetime income without changing their current target date provider and the new fixed annuity version of the SAB Secured Income Portfolio. Combining the recent DOL advisory opinion with our thirteen-year track record, expanded lifetime income solutions platform, and ongoing integrations of additional record keepers, we are well-positioned to benefit as interest in these solutions continues to grow. Expanding access to private assets in DC plans is another area where AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.'s innovation has already been addressing the need for more diversification and new return sources. We believe that incorporating private assets in target date funds can help deliver long-term results while also minimizing downside risks for participants. We've been doing this for a decade now, in both the US and the UK. We've embedded private assets into glide paths for many of our clients. This includes both corporate and public plans and spans private market segments such as private equity, private credit, and private real estate. Finally, I'd like to close with slide 10, which highlights our private market capabilities and our strong growth in this platform. Over the past decade, we've successfully expanded our private markets platform to nearly $80 billion in fee-paying and fee-eligible assets under management, representing a 17% year-over-year growth. We focus on credit-oriented strategies, offering diverse capabilities tailored to various risk-return and portfolio objectives. AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. Private Credit Investors, or ABPCI, our $22 billion middle-market direct lending platform, has a seventeen-year track record investing in directly originated, privately negotiated loans to core middle-market companies, offering a variety of solutions to institutional, insurance, and individual investor clients. AB CarVal, our $20 billion global asset-based credit platform, has a thirty-eight-year track record specializing in consumer, real estate, aviation, and energy transition opportunities, investing across drawdown, evergreen, and interval funds and across the capital structure from investment-grade private credit through opportunistic investing. US and European commercial real estate lending, our $12 billion commercial real estate lending platform, invests across property type and business plan in the US and Europe, expanding multiple risk-return profiles with fund, lead, and SMA offerings. Corporate and structured private placements, our $18 billion platform offers a differentiated relative value orientation to complement investment-grade portfolios. In addition to continued organic growth in this business of private credit markets, we continue to scale and diversify, we're actively exploring strategic partnerships and lift-outs to further expand our capabilities. For instance, our structured private placement team we onboarded approximately one year ago and already manages more than $2 billion in AUM. More recently, we added a correspondent residential mortgage team to expand the origination capabilities of our existing residential mortgage platform. Our relationship with Equitable provides us with significant competitive advantage as we expand our private markets business. We continue to scale existing and develop new solutions in partnership with Equitable, leveraging our existing investment teams such as residential mortgages, NAV lending, and private investment-grade asset-backed finance. These solutions are also core to our offering to other insurance and institutional clients, helping drive diversified growth in our private markets franchise. Our ability to provide borrowers with a range of solutions across the cost of capital spectrum and match those investment opportunities to the various risk-reward profiles of our diversified client base is a competitive advantage. With strong momentum in the business, we're confident that we'll achieve our target of $90 billion to $100 billion of assets under management by 2027. Now I'll pass it to Tom to cover our financial results.

Thank you, Seth. We are pleased to report strong financial performance in the third quarter, reflecting growth in asset management fees, driven by record AUM and focused expense discipline. Adjusted earnings for the third quarter came in at $0.86 per unit, representing a 12% increase compared to the prior year. Distributions grew uniformly with EPU as we distribute 100% of our adjusted earnings to unitholders. On slide 11, we present our adjusted results, which exclude certain items not considered part of our core operating business. For a detailed reconciliation of GAAP and adjusted financials, please refer to our presentation appendix or 10-Q. In the third quarter, net revenues reached $885 million, a 5% increase compared to the prior year. Base fees grew 5% year over year in line with net revenues. Total performance fees of approximately $20 million decreased by $6 million. Dividend and interest revenue, along with broker-dealer related interest expense, declined compared to the prior year, reflecting lower cash and margin balances within private wealth. Investment gains totaled $8 million, while other revenues were flat versus the prior year. Moving to expenses, our third quarter total adjusted operating expenses were roughly flat at $582 million compared to the prior year. In the third quarter, total compensation and benefits expenses amounted to $439 million, representing a 6% increase in absolute dollar terms compared to the previous year. This was due to a 48.5% compensation ratio of adjusted net revenues, slightly higher than the 48% ratio reported last year. We expect our fourth quarter 2025 compensation to revenue ratio will remain at 48.5%. We see potential upside if markets remain supportive for the remainder of the year. Compared to the previous year, third quarter promotion and servicing costs remained stable, while general and administrative expenses decreased by 17% year over year. This reduction was primarily due to lower professional fees and the one-time accelerated lease expense of around $12 million in 2024. Year to date, our non-compensation expenses are approximately $437 million, tracking better than our revised full-year guidance range of $600 million to $620 million for 2025. As a result of expense discipline and enhanced operational efficiency, we are again lowering our non-compensation expense projection to fall within $600 million to $610 million for the full year, anticipating a tick up in 2025. As a reminder, promotion and servicing accounts for roughly 20% to 25% of non-comp expenses and G&A for 75% to 80%. Third quarter interest on borrowings decreased by roughly $1 million versus the prior year due to lower cost of debt and lower debt balances. We have not funded our commitment to the Ruby Re sidecar, which we now expect will be called in 2026. In the meantime, we are pleased with the progress of the partnership and look forward to further advancing our collaboration with RGA. AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.'s effective tax rate was 6% in the third quarter, in line with our full-year guidance of 6% to 7%. Our operating income of $303 million is up 15% versus the prior year, reflecting strong margin expansion of 209 basis points. Over the last three years, operating income has grown at a 13% CAGR, reflecting 7% growth in revenues excluding Bernstein Research. While markets have been a tailwind to equity-driven revenues, that has not necessarily been the case for fixed income markets. We have managed to grow our liquid and private credit platforms largely organically, capitalizing on a strategic relationship with Equitable. At the same time, we have delivered on initiatives such as the Bernstein Research deconsolidation and the real estate relocation strategy to further enhance profitability and boost margins. Transitioning to slide 12, I'll cover the trajectory of our firmwide base fee rate net of distribution expenses. In 2025, our firmwide fee rate increased to 38.9 basis points versus 38.7 bps in the prior quarter. The sequential shift in AUM was supportive in 3Q as equity markets outpaced fixed income returns. Average active equity AUM made up 32.8% of firmwide AUM in the third quarter versus 32.3% in the prior quarter, but this is below the prior year's 34%, reflecting a negative year-on-year mix. Partially offsetting market dynamics, quarterly flows and FX dynamics were less supportive to our firmwide fee rate. We observed outflows from higher fee retail service alongside organic growth in lower fee categories such as SMAs, ETFs, and retirement. We continue to grow our private markets capabilities, which have also been supportive against the industry-wide fee rate pressures. Historical track record demonstrates a relatively durable fee rate, with our regional sales mix and strategic growth initiatives helping to partially mitigate industry-wide fee erosion. Over the past five years, our base fee rate has generally fluctuated between 39 and 40 basis points, reflecting relative stability versus the industry. Our all-in fee rate, including performances, has ticked higher over time, reflecting the growth in our private markets AUM. We are making significant strides in tapping into secularly growing long-duration capital pools that we can scale rapidly, leveraging our partnership with Equitable and our unique distribution capabilities. We remain enthusiastic about the value we bring to our clients and shareholders by focusing on scalable long-duration assets that align with our commitment to sustainable organic growth and long-term profitability, rather than solely concentrating on fee rates. Slide 13 offers a breakdown of our performance fees across private and public strategies. Third quarter performance-related fees totaled approximately $20 million, with nearly $18 million generated through our direct lending platform within private wealth, and approximately $2 million from institutional services, both public and private. In the fourth quarter, we expect an additional $35 million to $40 million in private market performance fees, reflecting modest upside from AB CarVal's strong performance coupled with an improved real estate backdrop for our CRE debt services. Strong year-to-date public markets have also increased the likelihood of upside from public market strategies that could potentially crystallize in the fourth quarter, assuming stable markets. Therefore, we expect an additional $5 million to $25 million from public performance fees. All in all, we are raising our full-year performance fee guide to $130 million to $155 million in total performance fees from our prior guide of $110 million to $130 million. As you can see, the range of potential outcomes will largely be driven by our public market strategies. Assuming flat markets, we view our guide as a floor rather than a ceiling, although we caution that the prior year's upside was largely driven by sector-specific windfalls in select public strategies. Although public beta is volatile and difficult to predict, our public alternative strategies improve our market leverage profile and provide additional upside in strong markets. This complements our more dependable private market performance fees, creating an attractive performance fee stream for our business. Turning to slide 14, as previously mentioned, adjusted operating margin rose to 34.2% in the third quarter, a 209 basis point increase from the prior year. As a result of favorable market conditions and improved operational efficiency, our year-to-date adjusted margin of 33.4% stands above our market-neutral forecast of 33%. We are pleased with the progress we have made to enhance margins, currently exceeding the midpoint of our Investor Day target. As we have been adding investment teams, new product launches, and marketing efforts, which are aimed at delivering enhanced earnings over time. While we continue to be disciplined on expenses, we expect our ongoing allocation of resources to targeted growth initiatives such as new teams and products to drive organic growth and sustainable profitability over the long term. Before we proceed to the Q&A session, I want to express my sincere appreciation to all my colleagues for their continued contributions and commitment. We are steadfast in our goal to efficiently allocate capital, create value for our clients, investors, employees, and stakeholders by simultaneously diversifying and expanding our business. With that, we are pleased to answer your questions.

Thank you. Questions. You're welcome to return to the queue to ask follow-up questions. Our first question will come from William Raymond Katz from TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Okay. Thank you. Good morning. I apologize, my voice is dealing with a bit of a hoarse situation here. Maybe starting on the insurance opportunity. I was wondering if you could flesh out maybe how the economic opportunity would sit with the opportunity with Carlyle. And then I think you mentioned in your commentary that the Ruby Re might get extended out to 2026. So I was wondering, is that a delay and what might be driving that? Thank you.

Hi, Bill. Let me take that. Yes, we are very excited about the continued momentum in our insurance asset management business. And FCA Re is our second sidecar investment to build on that positive experience we had with Ruby Re. Everything is going as planned with Ruby Re. We are pleased with the results to date. It's in line with our IRR expectations. And the relationship with RGA is off to a phenomenal start with all of the IMAs in place, and we already started deploying capital in all of the IMAs we have across multiple private alts mandates. So all in all, no issues with the sidecar expectations, performance, as well as our RGA relationship. That is obviously of the sidecar given we manage assets for the IGA balance sheet. And on the FCA Re, obviously, Carlyle is one of the investors with Fortitude as well as a number of Asian insurance companies. We really like that sidecar, and it's additive to Ruby Re because Ruby Re is in the asset-intensive space, primarily US liabilities versus FCA Re takes us to very attractive Asian insurance markets. It's also quite synergistic with our broader Asia strategy. So all in all, in terms of our insurance strategy with seven new clients in GA and 25 internal account relationships with eight new mandates and with two successful sidecar investments, we believe we are on track.

And Bill, it's Seth, and I hope you're feeling better. But just to clarify, the timing of the funding on RGA hasn't changed. It was always gonna be deferred. Yeah. I mean, it was always scheduled to be over this period. So I don't think there's any delay of any sort to note.

Okay. Thank you for the clarification. And just maybe the second question. Just seems like a lot of attention around the opportunity in private credit. If you could speak to just a couple of different facets, maybe what you're seeing in terms of credit quality seems to be quite a kerfuffle out there, which doesn't seem logical to us but nonetheless. And I was wondering if you could also help us understand what the rate sensitivity might be to the extent that forward rates come down? How we might think about Part one fees into 2026? Thank you.

Well, let me start, and whether it makes sense or not, Tom should jump in if I missed part of the answer. As we look at our various private credit teams, we see pretty competitive environments, pretty aggressive bidding for transactions across different asset classes. With maybe the exception of commercial real estate, which as you know has been out of favor for a while, although we do see more and more opportunities there. I'd also say that we do believe these are one-off transactions and don't suggest a broader material deterioration in credit quality. The economy continues to be fairly robust, albeit slowing. The maturities that many of our counterparties are facing are manageable, and their cash flow generation is positive. So on balance, we think we're in pretty good shape. With respect to First Brands, which is one of the names you did mention, we do have exposure there, and we're pretty well protected given that ours was an inventory financing vehicle rather than funding receivables. And we have a perfected interest and look, time is going to tell, but we feel at this point given the discussions we've had with all parties, we're sitting in a pretty good place. So all in all, we feel that they're continuing to grow. There will be deterioration in credits more broadly, and there will be individual names where fraud and other issues do arise. But we're not in any way shaken or disturbed by the course of the market.

Yes. I think the only thing I did there, Seth, is as rates decline, that may have an impact on our ability to generate performance fees.

Next question comes from Craig Siegenthaler from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning, Seth. Hope everyone is doing well. My question is on your Asia business. And what you're seeing and hearing from investors in the region. Following Liberation Day in the trade conflicts in the first half of the year, how have investors in Asia reacted to that? Have you seen any demand rotations from US to Asia product or from US to global product?

Hi, Craig. Let me take that question. To answer specifically for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P., actually in the third quarter, we definitely saw improvement in our Asia business, particularly in taxable fixed income. And we continue to see strong engagement from institutional clients as well. So all in all, despite the noise from tariffs, some of the debasement of the US dollar, we have not experienced any major impact on our business. But in our travels, anecdotally, clients talk more about getting exposure to other currencies and diversifying more into global and international equities. And also let me emphasize that our equities platform is a global platform. So although we are a US-headquartered global asset manager, our equity strategies are global. We have international strategies. We have regional strategies. We have global strategies. We are not necessarily at a disadvantage if there is a rotation away on a tactical basis or a structural basis from US equities into international or global. In our case, I think the pressure has been primarily in our large-cap growth product, and that is isolated in Japan. Obviously, as you know, we have delivered very impressive performance in Japan through that product over many, many quarters. I think it's natural to see some slowdown at some point. But I believe that is a much more product-specific trend as opposed to a broader structural or systemic risk for us. Our business.

Craig, I would just add that we have on-the-ground fundamental research capabilities in China and in broader Asia. And we are seeing more and more inquiries for those strategies principally from outside the US, but that interest is there and growing. And I would also say just back on the institutional point in Asia, we are continuing to see demand institutionally through US fixed income.

Got it. Thank you, Seth. My follow-up, I just wanted some clarifications on the strategic partnership with Fortitude Carlyle Asia REIT. So, how much capital do you invest in that sidecar? Where did those funds come from? And then I think you plan to manage private and liquid credit for Fortitude Carlyle Asia's general accounts. Is that right? What is the AUM potential?

Yeah. So let me start with AUM and the asset class, and then Tom can add on the financing implications, etcetera. So in terms of the relationship, this is to manage assets for the sidecar itself. It is predominantly private credit. We expect that to be around $1.5 billion across multiple private credit strategies. So that has a lot of similarities to Ruby Re, but there are two differences with Ruby Re. Number one, this is for the sidecar itself. And then in terms of the AUM lift, AUM lift here is going to be even greater when all the capital is called and deployed. In terms of financing of these sidecars, I also want to highlight the funding of the equity typically takes time. And let me hand it over to Tom to talk about the timing and the capital implications.

Yes. The commitment to FCA is $100 million. We plan to fund that in '26 or '27 when called. And there's a couple of levers or a few levers rather that we have available to us to fund it. We can, we're very under-levered, so we have credit lines available to us. And then we have units through two avenues, either public units or private units, and we'll evaluate the best course forward when we get there.

Right. And also to remind our investors, and we talked about it when we made the original Ruby Re investments. When we think about the economics of these deals, economics come from two different parts, right? Number one is, on the equity investment, we generate earnings. So typically these sidecars are modeled to deliver mid-teens 15% IRR. And so that is one stream of income. And then in addition to that 15% on average IRR, you get the downstream economics on the assets you manage. With relatively long-term IMAs. And those IMAs tend to be very much focused on private credit. So pretty sticky assets, relatively high fee. And as a result, it should be accretive to our revenue base and earnings on multiple dimensions.

Onur, Tom, thank you very much. Our next question comes from Alexander Blostein from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning, guys. This is Anthony on for Alex. Wanted to touch on the margin and kind of expense growth trajectory as we look out into the other couple of years, you guys are tracking ahead of your target for this year. And I appreciate the expense guide, but as we look out for the next couple of years, how should we think about the pace of margin expansion and non-comp expense growth?

Hi, Anthony. How's it going? Look, I'm gonna anchor back to Investor Day in 2023. We had a long-term target of 30% to 35% operating margin. There were two big anchors to achieving that at that point in time. It was the BRS divestiture, as well as the relocation and consolidation strategy in the US. We've achieved those. We're currently at the midpoint. We're going to our 33% margin target for 2025. And from there, there's no other stories or big stories to share with you on the expense side. We don't have anything of that size that's going to impact our expenses. Be able to bring them down as those two that I just mentioned. But we continue to look for a lot of small wins just as evidenced by our decrease, our second decrease actually this year, our non-comp controllable expenses. We're going to continue to look at items like that, but there's nothing more I can share with you related to that at this point.

Thanks. That's helpful. And maybe for my follow-up, just on the buyback, I was pretty light this quarter, and I'm not sure if that had to do with the Equitable conversion. But how should we think about kind of the capital allocation strategy specifically around buybacks or maybe any potential inorganic opportunities?

Yeah. The light buyback this quarter had nothing to do with Equitable. We do buy units back and retire them, as you're aware, for our deferred compensation plan. We probably have another $30 million to $35 million left to go this year to fund that. So I think it's just timing. I did read your note this morning. I just think it's a matter of timing. I think your number was pretty close. We only captured roughly $4 million of that in Q3 versus what you had.

Our next question comes from Daniel Thomas Fannon from Jefferies.

Yes. Thanks. Good morning. Seth, I think you said the bond reallocation is underway. Wanted you to elaborate a bit on those comments. And then as we look at your performance and the products you have, do you think you're positioned to benefit materially from that reallocation if and when that occurs?

Thanks, Dan. We continue to see, particularly in Asia, appetite remaining for taxable fixed income. While it's not at the gross sales levels they were prior to April, they are recovering, and we feel good about the trajectory there. From a relative performance perspective in our flagship products, we're doing fine. We could always do better, but I feel that that's not a hurdle to us gaining our share or better given our very strong distribution capabilities within the region. Additionally, we continue to look at new strategies to deploy in the region. When I look back in the US, we've had tremendous success in the tax-exempt SMA space. We think we're the largest player now in it, and we continue to see increasing adoption for our customized mass-customized solutions in a number of the key distributors and continue to grow as we innovate and develop more products. So look, I think that the short-term performance in the third quarter wasn't as good just given a couple of call-outs that I mentioned earlier on in emerging markets credit and given just the volatility and duration. But we're feeling good about performance and the team and the quality of the team and the discipline of their process. So Dan, I think it's in good shape. But there's always going to be volatility from quarter to quarter.

Yes. Let me add a few specific points. As Seth mentioned, per Morningstar, we are the number one retail muni SMA manager based on net flows. So we definitely capture market share. In the third quarter, our annualized organic growth rate was around 26%, so very strong results there. Second, in terms of broadening from US fixed income to global fixed income as a proof point, we had a $5 billion global credits win in the third quarter in Publix. So that's definitely demonstrating that we can also play on the global bond transition. And then finally, given the growth of our ETF franchise, we have additional ways to participate in the fixed income flows from different channels. I'm very pleased that as of October, our ETF platform exceeded $10 billion, and right now the run rate flows on a monthly basis typically exceed $250 million, and we had multiple more than eight ETFs in the third quarter that delivered more than $50 million in net flows. So overall, I feel given we have a relatively modest market share in many of these client segments, with new vehicles and the broad platform, we have a long way to achieve further upside.

I guess just the final point. The long-term performance is quite strong for those services. So yeah, we feel good with where we are. I hope that answers your question.

Sure. Yes, sure. Look, at the end, I mean, pipeline, I mean, good news is we have been deploying at very fast speeds. So eventually, you want to deploy so you can start generating revenue and assets. So we are very pleased that we are deploying. Although on a net basis, the pipeline came down given the deployments and the RGA dynamics, but ultimately we added a billion dollars to the pipeline. So it has been a strong quarter from that perspective. The other thing to highlight is, we don't basically get full credit for leverage on different products, which are fee-earning. Some of our competitors get credit on that leverage, including net flows, etcetera. So I wouldn't also kind of ignore the fact that we have $15 billion powder including leverage in our private credit platform. So that will also continue to flow in, and that's greater than our pipeline numbers. All in all, it's hard to promise a specific pipeline number. We are focused on deploying capital, generating revenue fast, and we are on track also with the build-out of our private credit platform given we are at $80 billion relative to our $90 billion to $100 billion '27 goal.

I would just add that FCA is not included in that pipeline yet. And we continue to see good search activity. But I would just also remind everybody that when we win some of these larger customized retirement solutions, they tend to be quite lumpy in the way that they impact the pipeline. So they're hard to predict, but there's activity in that space.

Thank you. You guys mentioned some areas of equities like structured equities and strategic core thematic. Can you kind of highlight the profile of the investors who are putting money to work there?

Sure, John. Hi, Onur again. Yes, let me comment on that. In terms of the structured equity, it is large Asian institutional. In terms of thematic products, healthcare has been more Europe, large European high net worths. In terms of some of the thematic like security of the future, we have a strong partnership with a large global private bank that has been the driver of that. So pretty global, it's well balanced between retail and geographically. Sure. Yes, sure. Look, at the end, I mean, pipeline, I mean, good news is we have been deploying at very fast speeds. So eventually, you want to deploy so you can start generating revenue and assets. So we are very pleased that we are deploying. Although on a net basis, the pipeline came down given the deployments and the RGA dynamics, but ultimately we added a billion dollars to the pipeline. So it has been a strong quarter from that perspective.

I would just add that FCA is not included in that pipeline yet. And we continue to see good search activity. But I would just also remind everybody that when we win some of these larger customized retirement solutions, they tend to be quite lumpy in the way that they impact the pipeline. So they're hard to predict, but there's activity in that space.

Our next question comes from Benjamin Elliot Budish from Barclays. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning and thanks for taking the question. Maybe just first on the private markets fees, you spent some time about what's going on in the public side. Curious on the private side in the slides you always emphasize that the majority comes from ABPCI. I would think that should be somewhat more predictable. I'm just curious what else I think the guidance came up a little over ten million for the full year. Just curious what else changed on the private side? And could you maybe touch on the sort of sensitivity to rates? I would assume a lot of that floating rate debt. So just curious if you could kind of frame that up?

Yeah. So, Ben, it's Tom. How are you doing? I agree. PCI is very stable and dependable, consistent performer. We get to crystallize those as we go throughout the year each quarter. Some of the other products don't crystallize until year-end, so they've got a little bit more variability to it. And during the year, we've also got some performance fees. I'm just trying to see if I've yeah. We've got some performance fees in commercial real estate and CarVal in our forecast as well, Ben.

Okay. Maybe just following up on a separate topic, the target date discussion from earlier. Just curious if you could unpack a little bit for the partners where you are allocating to private and custom funds, what do the allocations look like? What are the fee rate implications? And are there any kind of are they custom enough such that they're not good read-throughs to what we might see as this market opens up more broadly? Or do you think that perhaps those are good indicators? Appreciate any thoughts there. Thank you.

Sure. Let me take that, Onur here. In terms of our experience in DC and coming up with custom solutions, that goes back more than a decade, including the lifetime solutions. So we have deep experience structuring these solutions, including also alternatives into the glide path. We have been doing that for a long time both in the US as well as overseas, particularly the UK. Obviously, the executive order private alts in DC creates some momentum at least in terms of the talk track. I mean, our experience is typically DC market moves slowly given the litigation risk that is still high on the minds of the sponsors. And hence, although that's definitely a structural trend and we will definitely see more alternative assets in DC plans. I expect two things. One, I think it will start with more custom solutions like managed accounts, etcetera, as opposed to some of the existing large target date funds which are in commingled vehicles. So that will be my prediction. And two, in terms of the fees, given the pending litigation risk on the minds of the sponsors, there's going to be continued fee sensitivity in addition to the usual fee sensitivity of the institutional investors and the DC investors. So hence some of these alternatives products might not have the same fee levels as you see in some other channels. Definitely, there's going to be lower fees than the retail vehicles. And then in many cases, it might be even lower than some of the defined benefit plans. So that's how I think about it. That being said, in terms of our positioning, with $100 plus billion of custom retirement solutions including lifetime income, we are one of the biggest providers of custom solutions in the DC market globally. We definitely have a lot of ongoing partnership conversations as well. So as the market develops, we're going to be definitely in the front seat and we're going to be benefiting from that. But we are not taking any credit in our forecast in terms of any major flows coming from DC alts. Hopefully, that will be an upside if the market moves faster than I predict.

I would just add that to Onur's point that it's going to take time for this to mature given the caution and the process. But it's not unreasonable to think that privates could be 10% of these portfolios over time. In composition, private credit will play a big part of that. But again, it's going to take we're still in the very early days of this evolution. And I think you're gonna continue to see more activity over time.

We have time for one last question. Last question will come from William Raymond Katz from TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks for taking the extra question. So if you could unpack a little bit some of the success you're having on the private wealth side of the equation and just remind us of what the rate sensitivity is on cash? Thank you.

Sure. Thanks for the question, Bill. Yes, on the success of the business, we have a strong third quarter. In terms of annualized net new assets, growth was seven-plus percent in terms of net flows if I use the management metric 3.5% annualized. So definitely very strong. And what I like about that is it's driven by both record run rate productivity from the advisor side, uptick in sales as a result, as well as reduction in outflow. So it's a very healthy picture. I mean, at the end of the day, there will be always quarter-to-quarter volatility, but I'm happy with the direction of our business. In terms of the sensitivity to rates, we have very, very little sensitivity to rates in our private wealth business when it comes to cash economics. The cash economics is less than 5% of the total revenue and earnings contribution is modest. And the good thing is since we are self-funding our margin with the cash balances, we have a locked-in spread between what we pay versus what we earn. The result is our sensitivity to absolute fee levels is very low, particularly when the rates remain positive. And I think it will remain positive for the foreseeable future. So all in all, it's a non-event for our business. So we are much more protected on that dimension related to some other broker-dealers that have an economic or business model highly dependent on the spread income.

There are no further questions at this time. Mr. Jorgali, I turn the call back over to you.

Thank you all very much for attending our call today. We look forward to connecting with you. Please don't hesitate to reach out.

And we're now in private. Have a great day, everyone.

Thank you very much, Julian. I appreciate the help. Thank you. That was great.

It was my pleasure. Bye for now.