Good morning, and welcome to the Allegro MicroSystems Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Jalene Hoover, Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications.

Thank you, Amber. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today to discuss Allegro’s Second Fiscal Quarter 2024 results. I’m joined today by Allegro’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Vineet Nargolwala; and Allegro’s Chief Financial Officer, Derek D’Antilio. They will provide highlights of our business, review our quarterly financial performance and share our third quarter outlook. We will follow our prepared remarks with a Q&A session. Our earnings release and prepared remarks include certain non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures that are discussed today are not intended to replace or be a substitute for our GAAP financial results. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release which is available on the Investor Relations page of our website at www.alegramicro.com. This call is also being webcast, and a replay will be available in the Events and Presentations section of our IR page shortly. During the course of this conference call, we will make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of the company. We wish to caution that such statements are based on current expectations and assumptions as of today’s date and as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from projections. Important factors that can affect our business, including factors that could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements, are described in detail in our earnings release for the second quarter of fiscal 2024 and in our most recent periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our estimates or other forward-looking statements may change, and the company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes to assumptions or other events that may occur except as required by law. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Allegro’s President and CEO, Vineet Nargolwala. Vineet?

Thank you, Jalene, and good morning, and thank you for joining our second quarter fiscal year 2024 conference call. I’m pleased to report that we continued a strong performance in fiscal Q2. We delivered sales of $276 million, up 16% year-over-year, driven by continued strength in automotive and non-GAAP earnings per share established a new record at $0.40, up 29% year-over-year. We continue to execute our strategy of growing our business in e-mobility and select industrial markets, including clean energy and automation. Sales in these strategic growth areas were $154 million or 56% of total sales, up 37% year-over-year as we continue to gain share and outpace the competition. Automotive revenues in Q2 grew 31% year-over-year. Within that segment, e-mobility, which is the electrification of vehicles and increasing adoption of ADAS features continues to fuel Allegro’s growth. Sales into e-mobility applications increased by 60% year-over-year to 50% of Q2 automotive sales, establishing a new milestone and up from 41% in Q2 of 2023. Last quarter, we highlighted macro concerns related to China, a sentiment that was echoed by many in the semiconductor space as well as other industries. In September, I traveled to China with several members of my executive team, where we met with our customers, channel partners, suppliers and teams to obtain a comprehensive view of the market dynamics on the ground. While there are clearly challenges in the broader Chinese economy, we came away even more excited about the opportunities for Allegro, specifically related to e-mobility and clean energy. The enthusiasm and respect from our customers and our partners for Allegro’s long-standing heritage in automotive as well as for a track record of delivering innovative, high-quality products continues to position us as a partner of choice for Chinese OEMs who are increasingly capturing the world’s imagination and targeting a more global presence. As a proof point, we saw continued strong second quarter design win activity and shipments in China, which increased both sequentially and year-over-year. With local incentives for EVs extended until 2027 and increasing consumer enthusiasm for EVs, we have solidified plans for localizing key aspects of our supply chain, which will help us better support our customers in an increasingly competitive landscape. We were also pleased to celebrate the opening of our new Shanghai office, punctuating our commitment to our customers and our growing local team in the strategically important region. Looking to the future, we continue to see strong design wins in our strategic growth areas, including e-mobility, clean energy and automation. E-mobility alone represented approximately two-thirds of second quarter design wins. This design win momentum and the significant content opportunity associated with those design wins continues to drive our above-market performance and support future growth. A great example is BMW’s selection of Allegro as the sole current-sensor IC supplier for traction inverter systems used across the company’s entire fleet of battery electric vehicles. Allegro’s current sensor integrated circuits deliver market-leading accuracy, enabling precise motor control, leading to a superior driving experience and extended driving range by minimizing power losses. Additionally, our current sensors built-in overcurrent detection and self-diagnostics enable BMW to meet the highest level of safety and reliability while reducing the number of components used in the traction inverter. There has been some discussion lately about slowing momentum for EVs and whether hybrids are a better option. The transition to fully electric vehicles is a significant one and major technology transformations usually don’t happen in a straight line or without bumps in the road. BEVs are still projected to grow strong double digits over the foreseeable future as they remain the best way to meet emissions requirements. And I want to emphasize that Allegro’s content in full hybrid vehicles is significantly higher than that in ICE vehicles and similar to that in BEVs. So Allegro wins, no matter which platforms OEMs invest in and grow. This reinforces our confidence in the long-term target growth model we set at Analyst Day in March 2023. Beyond e-mobility, we’re seeing some near-term auto movement in our automotive business, primarily related to the impact of the UAW strike as OEMs and tiers rebalance their production plans. In Q3, we still expect our automotive business to grow year-over-year. Let me now comment on the industrial markets. In Q2, growth in industrial automation and clean energy helped offset declines at data center and broad industrials to deliver 6% year-over-year growth in industrial sales. The continuing macro trends are starting to have an impact on overall demand, leading industrial OEMs to become more cautious. Looking into the third quarter, we expect to see a sequential decline in industrial sales as OEMs trimmed their production schedules and managed their inventory. Our other market which is less than 10% of our sales and largely serves consumer applications has seen significant declines on a year-over-year basis due to slowing consumer demand and inventory correction. In response, we will continue to manage channel inventory tightly in both the industrial and consumer markets while still maintaining our market positions. While our backlog remains robust, our Q3 sales forecast reflects normal third quarter seasonality, heightened macroeconomic trends, elevated inventory levels in industrial and consumer markets and the lingering impact from the UAW strike in automotive. Over the mid and long-term, continued strong momentum in design wins, especially in our strategic focus areas of e-mobility, clean energy and automation and the deepening and expanding collaboration with leading OEMs like BMW reinforces our conviction in the target model of low double-digit sales growth and above 32% operating margin. Finally, I’d like to take a few moments to discuss the Crocus acquisition, which we closed on Tuesday this week. We’re delighted to welcome the Crocus team to Allegro and look forward to working together to serve our customers. Crocus’ IP and products complement Allegro’s portfolio while accelerating our roadmap and plans to deploy TMR to highly demanding applications by several years. Allegro’s TMR technology is strong in ADAS and Crocus will bolster our leadership in xEV applications as well as expand the aperture in industrial and consumer applications. Crocus’ industrial presence is complementary to Allegro’s leadership positions in automotive and industrial markets and will benefit from a strong global sales, engineering and supply-chain footprint. Putting this all together, we expect this business combination to strengthen Allegro’s leading position in magnetic sensing with world-leading Hall effect and leading-edge TMR solutions, which further enhances our long-term growth. I will now turn the call over to Derek to review the Q2 financial results and provide guidance for our third quarter. Derek?

Thank you, Vineet, and good morning, everyone. Starting with a summary of our Q2 financial results. Sales were $276 million. Gross margin was 58.3%, operating income was 31.3% and adjusted EBITDA was 37.1% of sales. As a result, earnings were $0.40 per share, an increase of 29% compared to Q2 of fiscal 2023. Sales to our automotive customers were $206 million, or 75% of our Q2 sales, an increase of 9% sequentially and 31% year-over-year. All automotive sales categories grew sequentially and year-over-year. E-mobility sales increased by 13% sequentially and 60% year-over-year, now representing 50% of second-quarter auto sales, up from 41% a year ago. Industrial sales were $51 million, declining 25% sequentially with the largest percentage declines in data center and broad-based industrial. This largely reflects the timing of shipments between Q1 and Q2 and our careful channel inventory management. Second-quarter industrial sales increased by 6% year-over-year. Other sales, which includes consumer applications, were $19 million, down 10% sequentially and 42% year-over-year, reflecting inventory destocking. Sales through distribution declined as expected and were down 8% sequentially as we continue to manage the channel closely. Channel inventories appear to have stabilized and POS was up sequentially. From a product perspective, magnetic sensor sales were $176 million, increasing 1% sequentially and 25% year-over-year. Sales of our power products were $100 million declining 4% sequentially, but increasing 2% year-over-year. Sales by geography were well balanced with 25% of our sales in China, 21% in the Americas, 20% in the rest of Asia and 17% each in Europe and Japan. Highlights in the quarter were 14% sequential growth in Japan and 12% sequential growth in China. Now turning to Q2 profitability. Gross margin was 58.3% compared to 57.8% in Q1 and above our guidance range of 56% to 57%, largely due to favorable product mix and foreign exchange. Operating expenses were $74 million or 27% of sales, declining by approximately $1 million sequentially and from 28% of sales a year ago. Second-quarter R&D expenses were 14% of sales and SG&A was 13% of sales. Operating margin was 31.3% of sales compared to 30.8% in Q1 and 27.9% a year ago. Operating margin dollars increased by 30% year-over-year on a comparable sales increase of 16%, demonstrating continued strong operating leverage. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 11.4%, slightly lower than expected due to the geographical mix of income. The second-quarter diluted share count was 195.1 million shares and net income was $78 million or $0.40 per diluted share. Moving to the balance sheet and cash flow. We ended Q2 with cash of $378 million. Cash flow from operations in the quarter was $47 million, and free cash flow was $16 million. From a working capital perspective, DSO was 39 days, down slightly from Q1 and days in inventory were 136 days compared to 132 in Q1 on slightly lower inventory balances. Capital expenditures in the second quarter were $31 million as we continue to build out our back-end operations in the Philippines. Before I move to Q3 guidance, I’ll make a few additional comments about the Crocus acquisition. As Vineet mentioned, we’re excited to have closed the Crocus acquisition two days ago on October 31. Since announcing this transaction in August, our teams have been planning for integration, which is now well underway. We are ready to begin selling Crocus products through our sales channels and expect to begin to realize cost synergies beginning in calendar 2024 as integration progresses. We also expect to utilize Crocus’ significant tax net operating losses within the first year of close by repatriating IP from France to the U.S. This will allow us to efficiently integrate Crocus into our operations, leverage our U.S. tax rate and obtain many of the same benefits typically associated with an asset transaction. In connection with the closing of Crocus, we executed a $250 million term loan at SOFR plus 275 basis points. In pro forma after closing, we have approximately $200 million in cash, and our net leverage is well below one turn. In addition, I’m pleased to report that Moody’s upgraded Allegro’s credit rating to Ba3. Now with that backdrop, I’ll turn to our Q3 outlook. Including two months of Crocus, we expect third quarter sales to be in the range of $250 million to $260 million. Our guidance contemplates a return to normal third quarter seasonality, the lingering impacts from the UAW strike and careful channel inventory management. Our long-term model, including low double-digit sales growth is still intact and in fiscal 2024, we expect our strategic focus areas of auto and industrial to outgrow the underlying markets. We expect the gross margin in Q3 to be approximately 54%, reflecting the projected product and channel mix as well as the initial impact of Crocus. Operating expenses are expected to decline by 4% sequentially and are anticipated to be approximately 28% of sales. We continue to make investments in R&D and sales in our strategic focus areas as we work towards our target operating model. We are also taking prudent actions to manage expenses and working capital as we navigate near-term macroeconomic uncertainties. We expect our non-GAAP tax rate to be approximately 12.5% and our diluted share count to be approximately 196.5 million shares. As a result, we expect non-GAAP EPS to be between $0.27 and $0.31 per share. In Q3, we expect the Crocus impact to be $5 million in sales, $3.5 million in interest expense, and $0.03 dilutive to EPS for the two months that Crocus is included in our results. Going forward, Crocus will be integrated into our magnetic sensor business.

Thank you, Derek. We believe our core growth engines and target financial model remain intact. We remain focused on executing our strategy that leverages the intersection of our industry-leading technology with the megatrends of electrification and automation in the automotive and industrial markets. We take great pride in our core value to innovate with purpose with the goal of delivering the greatest value to our customers, and we remain as bullish as ever and excited about the journey ahead. I want to thank our teams around the globe for delivering great results in Q2 and for their continued hard work and dedication to serve our customers. Now I’ll turn the call back to Jalene for the Q&A session. Jalene?

Thank you, Vineet. This concludes management’s prepared remarks. Before we open the call for your questions, I’d like to share our third fiscal quarter conference lineup with you. We are attending UBS’ Global Technology Conference on November 27 and 28 at The Phoenician in Scottsdale, Arizona. Wells Fargo’s Seventh Annual TMC Summit on November 29 at the Terranea Resort and Rancho Palos Verdes, California; and Barclays TMT Conference on December 7 at the Palace Hotel in San Francisco, California. We will now open the call for your questions. Amanda, please review Q&A instructions.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Gary Mobley of Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question. I want to start off my questions by focusing on the two largest global automotive markets, the U.S. and China. Last quarter, you called out some bookings weakness in China. But since then, we’ve seen some reacceleration in their light vehicle build rates. So maybe if you can just speak to the bookings trends that you’re seeing in China. And I would have thought that the UAW strike would not be tremendously material for overall global light vehicle production, but maybe if you can just call out or size the impact as you see it here as we go through the third quarter.

Yes, hi Gary, this is Vineet. Thanks for the question. So you’re right. Last quarter, we had expressed some concerns about trends in China. And I think we were pleased to see that the bookings returned quite strongly for our China business. And certainly, our visit to the region, spending a week on the ground with customers and partners reinforces that the e-mobility trend continues to be really strong and vital within the China customer base. And I think we’re just seeing a resumption and a continued acceleration of the order rate. On the UAW part, it’s difficult to quantify, but I will tell you that we are seeing order movement between quarters. And we’ve said this before, we are several steps removed at times from the OEMs in terms of the supply chain or the value chain. And so we don’t always get a direct correlation between a platform and our product but it is clear to us that there has been some order movement between quarters as the tiers and the OEMs rebalance their production schedules as a result of the strike and our managing the various inventory positions as well.

And Gary, this is Derek. We saw a demarcation. Our auto sales were up 9% in Q2. And we saw a demarcation between sales after the strike started in September with the big three automakers in Q3. So while it’s been settled now at this point, there’s still some lingering effect. So it’s not material, but it does have an impact on Q3. The other things that impact Q3 are a return to some normal seasonality, which has been above 4% or 5% prior to the supply chain crisis for the last few years.

Thanks. As my follow-up, I wanted to ask about distribution inventory. What was the mix for the second quarter sales? And I would assume since point-of-sale was up in sell into the distribution channel was down 8% as you called out, the inventory decrease in the distribution channel. And maybe you could just speak to where it sits today, measured in weeks relative to where your normal range is?

Yes. So we’ve talked in the past about our target range as being about 10 to 12 weeks. And I would say that we’re kind of at the higher end of that range right now, Gary, and we’ve been there now for this quarter. And what we’ve seen is the inventories in the channel have stabilized. The good news is POS was up higher than our sell-in to the channel and we’ll continue to watch that very closely and the split in Q2 was about 50-50, so 50% OEM, 50% distribution. We expect that split in Q3 to be higher OEM and a little bit lower distribution as we continue to manage that. And that’s part of the reason why the gross margin guide in Q2 is coming down. That’s about 100 basis points, as I’ve talked about in the past, we’re selling it to the channel because of the volumes has a significantly higher gross margin. So we’ll continue to manage that very, very closely in the short term to make sure that we’re not over shipping into the channel.

Thanks guys.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Blayne Curtis at Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hey good morning guys. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask on the inventory in industrial. I mean you went through a cycle in the other consumer bucket, and there’s a period where you were kind of shipping the backlog. I’m just kind of curious what your perspective is in industrial, how much inventory is there and kind of how long this correction might take?

So I’ll start with some numbers Blayne, then I’ll turn it over to Vineet. But when you look at industrial, we continue to shift from backlog really in Q4 and Q1. So our industrial sales were actually up 17% in Q1 compared to Q4. Q4 had 14 weeks, so it was really up in the low 20s. So coming down 25% in Q2. Part of that is the timing of when our scheduled shipments were scheduled to ship. So that’s part of it. But there is inventory in the channel, as I just talked about. We continue to watch that closely. We certainly expect sales to distribution and industrial to be muted again in Q3 and be down again in Q3 as part of our guidance, and we’ll watch that closely until we think that we’re not over shipping to demand.

Yes, Blayne. What I would add is when you think about the end markets within our industrial business, this broad industrial, which again is highly fragmented set of different applications. But one of the big markets is solar. As we supply our set of ICs for a variety of applications that make up the solar ecosystem, the solar business is pretty muted at this point. And so when we take a step back and take a look at the inventory positions at our distributors that serve the industrial market, so data center is another one. And we say the inventory positions are well within the comfortable range, maybe at some places, they’re a little bit higher, we’re watching the POS very carefully to make sure that we are not creating or exacerbating the inventory problem. And so that’s why we are intentionally managing our shipments into those industrial distributors. But I would say that the end markets of data center and solar, in particular, are the ones that are muted. And I think it’s anybody’s guess as to how long it’s going to take for those markets to recover and come back, okay? But it’s probably going to be a couple of quarters, at least.

And then the $5 million from the Crocus acquisition, is that being recorded in the industrial bucket?

Largely, it will be in the industrial bucket, Blayne, yes.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Blake Friedman of Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. I wanted to touch on gross margin again. I know you gave some brief comments. But last time you were around this $250 million revenue level, gross margins were still able to hold around 58%. And so just in the 54% guidance for December, just was hoping you could quantify more of the puts and takes into that.

Blake, this is Derek. Yes, I mean, our gross margins have only touched 58% twice, once this quarter and once two quarters ago. In this quarter here in Q2, we had a really positive product mix, magnetic sensing and in particular, some products within that. We also had some positive foreign exchange. What I’ve talked about in the past is kind of the near-term gross margins being in that 56% range. And when I look at Q3, if I exclude the initial impacts of Crocus, the base business gross margins are about 55%, and that includes a headwind of around 100 basis points from the decline in channel inventory. So as channel inventories start to normalize, the base business goes back to around 56%. And product mix can have about a 100 basis point plus or minus impact on that gross margin. So we’re still working towards our structurally improving our cost structures and working towards our target model of 58%. On the Crocus business, their variable contribution margins are quite acceptable to us right now but they are business that needs to scale. And as we start getting some of the cost synergies and bringing in some of our supply chain and some of our logistics, we expect to get their gross margins overall to our target model well over time.

Great. Very helpful. And then also just maybe within your December guidance as well. Just specifically in terms of your autos outlook, I know you mentioned it should grow year-on-year. But is there any way you can kind of talk about the buckets in terms of e-Mobility and non-e-Mobility as we kind of look in the next quarter? That would be great. Thanks.

Yes, Blake, this is Vineet. I’ll answer that. So we continue to be very pleased with our momentum in e-Mobility, and we expect e-Mobility to stay strong as we look to the next quarter sequentially. We are seeing some order movement in our ICE shipments or product set. And so we expect that to be down but as we said before, on a year-over-year basis, we are still expecting overall order to have good growth.

Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Joshua Buchalter at TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I wanted to follow up on Blake's second question. In the outlook, which should see year-over-year growth, I need to project a significant sequential decline to get close to flat year-over-year. It seems like the only specific challenge you've mentioned is the order movement related to the UAW strike. Can you provide more details on the auto segment from a sequential perspective? Are there other areas where you believe demand is currently underperforming? Thank you.

One number thing I’ll clarify, Josh, year-over-year, we expect auto to well outgrow the market. So auto for the overall year, fiscal 2024 versus 2023 will well outgrow the market.

I was just on a follow-up on that. I mean, your confidence that after under shipping in the third quarter on the auto basis, you should return to sequential growth. Could you remind us of like what seasonal is because it’s been so atypical for the last several quarters?

Yes, Josh, we’re not saying it will return to sequential growth next really. We haven’t commented on Q4. We’re saying that Q3 auto is going to be down probably mid-single digits in Q3, e-Mobility will remain robust. The sharper decline in Q3 is going to be industrial and other, as we’ve talked about. For the fiscal year, though, we expect auto to be well above market growth rates and well above our target operating model of 7% to 10% above auto production growth.

And then, Josh, within that, obviously, e-mobility is what is really driving overall growth for us in auto. And as I said in my prepared remarks, we are really agnostic in terms of the content between full hybrids and BEVs. And so the content is very similar for us right now. And so we are agnostic and actually supporting both platforms and growth in both platforms for our customers. It’s correlated to that pure ICE vehicles would see some decline. And I think that’s pretty well understood broadly by third-party estimates as well and our safety confident convenience business is really agnostic to the powertrain. So that continues to be really stable and starts to see a little bit of content lift with more electrified content.

Thank you for the detailed information. For my follow-up, I understand that you don’t have perfect visibility into the channel. It seems like things are stabilizing in the industrial sector. However, considering your on-book inventories are still higher than usual, are you comfortable with the current situation? Is there more to address from your on-book perspective in the coming quarters? I'm interested to know your thoughts on this. Thank you.

Yes, Josh, this is Derek. So the on-book inventories, the absolute dollar amount came down about $1 million from Q1. The days went up a little bit on the sales down about 1%. So I think we’re still comfortable with those levels because the majority of that inventory is in wafer and actually in die bank now. So the good news is we’ve been able to put in place more progress and move that inventory to die pro die bank, which means it’s good die. And that lasts quite some time, but we are continuing to manage those inventory levels to make sure that we’re aligning wafer receipts with projected demand. And certainly managing finished goods inventories, and we’re also managing working capital very tightly and CapEx, as you might imagine here in the near term.

Got it. Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Christopher Caso at Wolfe Research. Chris, your line is open.

Yes, thank you. Good morning. I guess the first question is regarding the backlog and visibility going forward. Obviously, lead times have been long, product has been short. As things get a little bit more normal, how does that affect your visibility in the backlog as we look into the December quarter and does that have any implications for the March quarter? What do you consider to be kind of normal seasonal behavior for the March quarter? And what sort of visibility do you have for that now?

Chris, this is Vineet. So I want to start answering that question by saying that the visibility that we really get is first based on our design wins. So our design wins and the customer forecast that comes with those design wins is really what we use for our call it, our mid to long-term planning purposes. And that sets the table for our R&D investments, our capital investments, our factory planning and so on. And then in the near term, that forecast gets turned into orders, which then become part of the backlog. And you’re right that as lead times have come back more into the normal range, the backlog has moderated to what we would call the normal range, right? Typically, it’s two quarters with what we would consider normal. We are back within that range. So we have good visibility for the next couple of quarters and the forecast continues to evolve based on the design wins. So hopefully, that gives you a sense for how we think about visibility and how we think about the next couple of quarters.

Got it. If I could ask a follow-up on the Crocus acquisition. If you could speak to the rationale for that because obviously, you guys were ready doing internal work on TMR sensors. What was the decision to go out and buy as opposed to continue that development internally?

Yes, Chris, that's a great question, and I'm glad to revisit this important topic. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, Allegro has historically excelled in developing TMR for ADAS and our automotive business. In evaluating the Crocus technology and its development over the past few years, we found it to be an excellent match for xEV applications, which are becoming more demanding in terms of accuracy and robustness over temperature and lifespan. Thus, while it presents a build versus buy decision, integrating Crocus into our portfolio has accelerated our roadmap by several years. We can now offer this TMR technology with minimal adjustments from our engineers, making it automotive grade and ready to deliver to our automotive customers almost immediately. Over the next few days and weeks, our sales team, alongside the Crocus team, will approach all automotive customers. It’s worth noting that Crocus currently lacks an automotive business, primarily focusing on industrial applications. Our aim is to introduce this technology to our automotive clients and some of our more demanding industrial customers. This will enable us to significantly grow TMR within the entire marketplace and especially within the Allegro portfolio. We are truly excited about the potential to provide a more comprehensive magnetic sensing portfolio to our customers, which we believe will help further differentiate us in the applications we serve and create new opportunities for expansion.

If I could just follow up quickly on that, too. And given the need for qualification, the auto customers, the need to bring those up to automotive grade, can you give us a sense of what the qualification time would be and when we’d start to see an impact at those auto customers?

Yes, it’s a great question. So auto calls typically are long cycle, right? It takes at least a year to get automotive calls if you’re starting from scratch. The good news is that the Crocus team was already in process of qualifying their technology at several key OEMs. We can now come in and help accelerate that. And so we believe that we’ll be able to see some impact from automotive customers much sooner than what a traditional call cycle would call for.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton at Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

I'm trying to understand the factors influencing the auto outlook. You mentioned lowering guidance in December, which seems to be affected by seasonality and the UAW strike. However, these issues appear to be short-term. I'm curious why we wouldn't expect a return to typical seasonality or strength in March. Are you noticing a broader slowdown in the auto industry that affects the current outlook? If not, why wouldn't we return to normal seasonality by March?

Quinn, this is Vineet. We're not providing explicit guidance for next quarter. However, we aren't observing a slowdown in the auto sector overall. Previously, we mentioned that auto production remains subdued due to the supply chain crisis, and we still need to reach around 90 million global units to restore balance in the industry. The industry is making progress toward that goal. The mix of vehicles is up for discussion, but as I noted in my prepared remarks, we have become indifferent to the distribution between hybrids and battery electric vehicles, as these are the main types that we believe the original equipment manufacturers are focusing on. Additionally, we mentioned today that we continue to see strong performance in e-mobility, with some short-term fluctuations in orders between quarters, along with seasonality factored into our Q3 guidance.

And to break it down a bit, Quinn, that’s absolutely correct. However, the industrial segment and others have a different dynamic. Historically, it has taken a few quarters to clear out inventory in the channels where those products are sold in those two markets.

Understood. And then Derek, just kind of try to parse the gross margin. It sounds like the channel mix to OEM, which is about 100 basis points. Sounds like Crocus is about 100 basis points. I guess in the near term, if I just run the math, it looks like Crocus comes in with effectively zero gross profit to kind of impact overall corporate margins by 100 basis points. How should we be thinking about the gross margin trajectory over the balance of this year and then into fiscal 2025? Do you think it sort of stays in this $54 million to 55% range given sort of the drag on Crocus? Or do you think that you can kind of get back to that more that 56% level that I guess I would call more your sort of near-term target for gross margins?

Yes. In the first quarter, the initial effects of Crocus included some start-up costs, but the gross margins were positive, showing some improvement. The core business’s gross margin in Q3 is around 55%, which takes into account challenges from channel inventory management. Normalizing the channel business moving forward would bring this to 56%. We also anticipate achieving some cost synergies as we return to operations for Crocus and enhance our working relationship with suppliers and our back-end facility in the Philippines in 2024. In the medium term, we expect to maintain that 56% gross margin and are striving to reach our operating model goal of improving gross margins by 50 to 100 basis points, aiming for 58%. It’s important to note that Q3 is the initial quarter of Crocus in terms of operating expenses, which are down 4%. They would have been down 10% without Crocus, and we plan to continue integrating them into our organization as part of our magnetic sensing business.

Understood. Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Vijay Rakesh at Mizuho. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. So on the BMW announcement, you guys highlighted that it’s a sole source kind of win for you. And I was just curious, like, is this a normal approach for some of those e-Mobility design wins you guys are seeing? And also, have you seen any shift between kind of the sole source and dual-source approach coming out of the shortages? Are you seeing kind of incrementally OEMs using one model sourcing versus the other?

Hi Natalia, this is Vineet. Thanks for the question. And the short answer is that it depends on the OEM. I would say that, yes, there are certainly efforts on the part of some OEMs to make sure that they have at least a dual source for some of the key components. But there is also our case where we have redundant sources of manufacturing. So we are able to bring supply chain resiliency to bear. And so when we present to our OEMs it’s the most comprehensive portfolio of products, especially when it comes to magnetic sensing and some of the power applications we serve. And then we talk about the supply chain resiliency that’s in-built into our supply chain with multiple sources for wafers, multiple packaging and assembly and test locations. And so that allows us to get to a sole source position. I would tell you that the complexity of designing the xEV powertrains and systems as well as the demanding nature of some of these applications where we certainly presented the best option that can meet those needs across life, across a wide range of operating conditions lends us to be sole sourced in most of these cases.

That’s very helpful. And as a follow-up, Vineet, would you speak a little bit more to the data center dynamics? It sounds like over the last few quarters, you guys have highlighted somewhat the weakness in there. Has there been any structural kind of change to what’s pulling the demand? And are you seeing any sort of near-term or midterm tailwinds that might kind of shift that dynamic?

Yes. Natalia, it’s a really good question. So first of all, data center is a very small part of our business. It’s less than 5% of our total sales. In the near term, we don’t really see any change in the data center dynamic. We’re in constant communication with our data center partners, tiers and distributors and they’re not indicating any sense of a change in direction or the market starting to recover. The positive, if I can call out, one, is that we continue to have new design wins with our data center customers. So we’ve, in the past, talked about the shift towards 48-volt architecture. That results in new platforms, new product requirements and for us, new design wins. And as the industry moves to 3-phase fans or 3-phase motors there’s more content for us. We’re seeing design win activity associated with that. But for the next couple of quarters, we don’t really see any potential recovery in the data center space.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Vijay Rakesh at Mizuho. Please go ahead Vijay. One moment for our next question. I am showing no further questions in the queue. I would now like to hand it back to Jalene for closing remarks.

Thank you, Amanda. We appreciate you taking the time to join us this morning. This concludes this morning’s conference call.