Welcome to the Aemetis Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Review Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Todd Waltz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Aemetis, Inc. Mr. Waltz, you may begin.

Thank you, Kate. Welcome to Aemetis fourth quarter 2020 earnings review call. We suggest visiting our Web site at aemetis.com to review today's earnings press release, updated corporate presentation, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, recent press releases, and previous earnings conference call. The presentation is available for review or download on the Investor section of the aemetis.com Web site. Before we begin our discussion today, I'd like to read the following disclosure statements. During today's call, we'll be making forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements with respect to our future stock performance, plans, opportunities, and expectations with respect to financing activity and the execution of our business plan. These statements must be considered in conjunction with the disclosures and cautionary warnings that appear in our SEC filings. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements made on this call involve risk and uncertainties, and that future events may differ materially from the statements made. For additional information, please refer to the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings, which are posted on our Web site and are available from the company without charge. Our discussion on this call will include a review of non-GAAP measures as a supplement to financial results based on GAAP. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in our earnings release for the quarter ended December 31, 2020, which is available on our Web site. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income or loss, plus to the extent deducted in calculating such net income, interest expense, loss on extinguishment, income tax expense, intangible and other amortization expense, accretion expense, depreciation expense, loss contingency on litigation, and share-based compensation expense. Now, I'd like to review the financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended 2020. Revenues were $37.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to $52.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2019. The decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to delays in the India government oil marketing company biodiesel tender process, the delayed revenue in our India operation and temporarily lower ethanol production prices in North America. Gross loss for the fourth quarter was $3.4 million, compared to a gross profit of $5.8 million during the same period in 2019. The gross profit change was attributable to the temporary ethanol production volume and price reductions during the fourth quarter of 2020, during which the price of ethanol decreased from $1.82 per gallon to $1.64 per gallon in a market where the cost of delivered corn rose from $5.02 to $5.61 per bushel during the same respective periods. Selling, general administrative expenses decreased to $4.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to $4.7 million during the fourth quarter of 2019. Operating loss was $7.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to operating income of $1 million during the fourth quarter of 2019. Net loss was $14.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to net loss of $7.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2019. Turning to our balance sheet, cash at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020 was $592,000 compared to $656,000 at the end of the fourth quarter of 2019. As an additional note, capital expenditures of $17.3 million were made for the construction of carbon intensity reduction projects and key plant upgrades during 2020. That completes our financial review for the fourth quarter and year end 2020. Now I'd like to introduce the Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Aemetis, Eric McAfee for business updates. Eric?

Thank you, Todd. The earnings release that was sent out this morning has a link to the updated Aemetis presentation that we will refer to today. As we discuss results from 2020, I encourage you to consider viewing our updated slide presentation, which can be found on the investor page of our Web site under this conference call. Aemetis was founded in 2006. We have grown into four lines of business which are focused on producing renewable natural gas, including below zero carbon intensity dairy biogas for transportation fuel, renewable fuels, including low carbon and below zero carbon intensity ethanol, high grade distilled biodiesel, renewable jet and diesel using cellulosic hydrogen from waste wood and byproducts, including carbon dioxide and corn oil, health safety products, including sanitizer, alcohol, refined glycerin, blended hand sanitizer, and other health safety products and technology development, to maximize the value of our products and processes. We own and operate production facilities with more than 110 million gallons per year of capacity in the US and India. Included in our production portfolio is a 65 million gallon per year fuel ethanol, hybrid alcohol, wet distillers grains and distillers corn oil plant located in Keyes, California, near Modesto. We also build, own and operate a 15 million gallon per year capacity distilled biodiesel and refined glycerin biorefinery on the east coast of India near the port city of Kakinada. Before discussing our business, I'd like to comment on the social and environmental impact of our company and projects. The circular bio-economy created by our California dairy renewable natural gas project, our soon to be solar-powered ethanol plants, and our renewable jet and diesel plant under development to use cellulosic hydrogen from waste orchard wood and our sanitizer alcohol business provide benefits to the local environment and communities. For example, by providing an alternative use of waste wood and ultimately eliminating fuel burning of the 3 billion pounds per year of waste orchard within California Central Valley, we plan to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, while displacing carbon-intensive feedstock with negative carbon intensity feedstock for the production of renewable jet and diesel fuel. Aemetis projects result in a healthier planet and a better quality of life for our fellow Californians. From a social impact perspective, everyone living in the Central Valley is directly impacted by poor air quality since the region has the dubious distinction of having the second worst air quality in the US according to the EPA. The Aemetis production facilities and dairy renewable natural gas projects in California are located in or near disadvantaged communities. Our dairy renewable natural gas projects, Keyes plant upgrades, and renewable jet and diesel projects are specifically designed to have a direct positive impact on these communities. Our projects directly benefit Central Valley disadvantaged communities and families by improving air quality, while creating valuable energy and food products from dairy and orchard agricultural waste and increasing the sustainability of farming and dairy operations that employ thousands of local workers. The Aemetis 2020 earnings report was a positive overall outcome, especially considering that more than 50 ethanol plants in the US were shut down at various times during 2020 due to pandemic-related gasoline demand decreases and significant corn price increases caused by historic Midwestern weather conditions. Despite these challenges, the Aemetis Keyes ethanol plant operated continuously throughout the year by responding quickly to opportunities. In March 2020, we quickly upgraded production systems to supply high-grade alcohol to the sanitizer alcohol market, and the Keyes plant became the largest sanitizer alcohol producer in the western US during a time of critical need for our country. Aemetis operations were significantly impacted in 2020 by work constraints and market conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, we focused on keeping our employees safe. We also invested more than $17 million in building carbon intensity reduction projects and other upgrades that have generated a significant amount of shareholder value. Despite the difficult external conditions that began in Q1 2020, we completed phase one of the dairy renewable natural gas project, began the installation of important Keyes plant energy efficiency systems upgrades to significantly reduce the carbon intensity of our ethanol, and began operations of the Messer CO2 liquefaction facility that is now generating CO2 revenues and IRS 45Q credits from carbon reuse. Protecting the health of our employees will continue to operate our California ethanol plants to supply animal feed to about 80 local dairies during a time period in which demand for biofuels, starting in Q2 2020, decreased significantly due to steep declines in gasoline consumption as a result of California's shelter-in-place orders. However, as the economy began to reopen in mid-2020, fuel ethanol demand partially recovered during the second half of 2020. With the release of the COVID-19 vaccines in early 2021 and overall increased economic activity, the Keyes plant is now running at full capacity to meet the increased demand for ethanol in California, partially driven by recent severe winter weather in the Midwest that caused disruption to the railroad supply chain used by Midwest ethanol producers. During the fourth quarter and full year of 2020, Aemetis achieved important milestones toward revenue growth and sustained profitability in each of our four lines of business. Let's review our Aemetis dairy, renewable natural gas, and pipeline projects. At Aemetis, we are focused on producing below zero carbon intensity products, including the production of negative carbon intensity renewable natural gas and renewable fuels. Our projects maximize the value of carbon credits under the California low carbon fuel standard, the Federal Renewable Fuel Standard, and IRS 45Q tax credits, while reducing operating expenses by using waste materials as feedstocks. Using our byproducts from ethanol production or using readily available agricultural waste products from the local area, the sustainability and environmental benefits of our processes can benefit all of the parties in the value chain. An excellent example of this low carbon sustainable circular biogas economy is our dairy renewable natural gas project, which is designed to have many synergies with our Keyes ethanol plant. Our Keyes ethanol plant uses agricultural feedstocks that absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, then produces ethanol and animal feed. The plant delivers about 2 million pounds per day of wet distillers grain to about 80 local dairies to feed more than 100,000 dairy cows. The dairy cows provide waste to the dairy digesters we build at each dairy, thereby producing biogas that we clean up and pressurize in an Aemetis processing unit at the dairy, then transport via the Aemetis biogas pipeline back to the Aemetis ethanol plants to use in the production of ethanol by displacing high carbon intensity petroleum natural gas. In addition, the dairy biogas can be upgraded and compressed to produce renewable natural gas to fuel RNG trucks at our fueling station at the Keyes plant to carry our wet distillers grains to the 80 dairies. Trucks can also be fueled at any RNG station connected to a utility pipeline. Since our RNG interconnection to the PG&E pipeline enables us to send renewable natural gas to other RNG fueling stations that we build or are owned by others, this skill pool system is scheduled to be operating by the end of 2021. In September 2020, we completed construction of the first two out of 17 covered lagoon digesters in the Aemetis biogas central dairy digester project, including on-site dairy biogas cleanup and pressurization, a four-mile pipeline owned by Aemetis, and a boiler unit to utilize the biogas to operate the Keyes plant. We are now generating dairy biogas with an estimated carbon intensity of negative 416 that is being used at our ethanol plant, displacing petroleum natural gas with a carbon intensity of positive 100. Methane, commonly known as natural gas, is a potent greenhouse gas that is up to 80 times more destructive than carbon dioxide at warming our planet's atmosphere. Approximately 25% of California's methane emissions come from the newer waste ponds on dairy farms. To reduce damaging methane emissions, California passed the law commonly known as Senate Bill 1383, that mandates a 40% reduction in methane emitted by large dairy lagoons by the year 2030. Biomethane sourced from dairies can be used directly in the form of renewable compressed natural gas to replace gasoline or diesel fuel in cars, trucks, and buses to significantly reduce carbon emissions and air pollution. To support the state mandate, California has funded, through the California Department of Agriculture and other agencies, matching grants to dairies to build biogas digesters and related systems. To date, Aemetis has applied for or been awarded about $23 million of grants for biogas and energy efficiency to support our conversion to low carbon and below zero carbon intensity power to operate our California biorefinery and produce renewable natural gas. We believe that capturing biogas from dairies and converting it into renewable natural gas to generate negative carbon intensity transportation fuel is an excellent way to reduce climate change, create value for dairies, and reduce costs for diesel truck fleets, and potentially for electric vehicles, by converting dairy renewable natural gas to electricity. Aemetis is uniquely positioned as one of only two ethanol plants in California that can maximize the value of biogas due to our proximity to dairies, and we are able to use biogas in our plants until our planned utility pipeline and interconnection and gas upgrading is completed. In addition, we were awarded a $1 million grant to install our own renewable natural gas dispensing system at our Keyes plant for CNG trucks, supplying fuel for the approximately 75 truckloads per day of animal feed and ethanol at the Keyes plant. In 2019, after more than a year of project development and financing work, we announced $30 million of equity financing to fund our biogas projects. Our institutional investors are working with us to expand this funding with $25 million of additional equity funding to complete a total of 17 dairies by the end of Q2 2022. In addition to about $75 million of USDA guaranteed debt funding that is in process with one of the largest USDA letters in the US. This 17 dairy project is scheduled to generate more than $40 million per year of operating cash flow under 25-year dairy supply contracts. Let's discuss progress at our California ethanol plant. Revenues from ethanol production were approximately flat at $112 million in 2020 compared to $115 million for 2019, as higher ethanol prices offset our decision to respond to low margins by reducing production to 60.2 million gallons in 2020 instead of the 64.7 million gallons produced in 2019. Our decision to slightly reduce production by about 7% enabled us to operate the plant while managing finished goods inventory during the temporary decline in ethanol demand in 2020. Currently, the Aemetis ethanol plant is operating at maximum sustainable production rates due to increased demand related to the winter weather in the Midwest that reduced ethanol production at some plants and created a shortage in California, along with the loosening of many state and local COVID restrictions that increased demand for gasoline and ethanol. During 2020, gross profit percentage margins improved about 6% from 6.2% to 6.6% of revenues compared to 2019. SG&A expenses were actually reduced, and earnings per share were basically unchanged, while EBITDA decreased only slightly for the year 2020 compared to 2019. New higher-margin businesses largely offset the adverse impact of the COVID pandemic on ethanol and biodiesel revenues and margins for the year. Aemetis operates in three of the Federal essential critical infrastructures, and we were able to continuously operate our California ethanol plant this past year in order to provide transportation fuel, alcohol for sanitizer products, CO2 for food production, and animal feed. By implementing stringent PPE and workers’ safety policies, we were able to continue to operate our ethanol facility, work on the construction of plant upgrades, and build our dairy renewable natural gas project without interruption. This work progress was achieved despite COVID shutdowns and operating restrictions that impacted many other companies in California and the Midwest. To increase the value of our ethanol and high-grade alcohol and to reduce the cost of operation of our production plant, we are currently implementing several upgrade projects related to the California ethanol plants, including number one, constructing the dairy biogas cluster and pipeline to deliver renewable natural gas to the Keyes ethanol plant from an initial two dairies that became operational in September 2020, with planned expansion to an additional 15 dairies by the end of Q2 of next year, along with a gas cleanup unit and interconnection to the utility gas pipeline and an RNG fueling station at the Keyes plant. The dairy RNG will be used to eventually significantly reduce or potentially eliminate the use of petroleum natural gas at the Keyes ethanol plant, as well as replace diesel use in trucks related to Keyes plant operations. Number two, completing the installation of the new $8 million zeolite membrane dehydration unit from Mitsubishi that will reduce natural gas use at the ethanol plant by replacing our molecular sieves, which use a significant amount of petroleum natural gas to operate with electrically powered equipment. This upgrade to an electric dehydration system will reduce the carbon intensity of our fuel ethanol and is partially funded by a $1.5 million energy efficiency grant. Number three, installing a solar panel microgrid array with battery backup to further reduce natural gas consumption by replacement with solar electricity, while optimizing energy use throughout the ethanol plant, which is primarily funded by an $8 million California Energy Commission grant. Number four, designing and building a Mechanical Vapor Recompression or known as MVR system to significantly reduce petroleum natural gas use, partially funded by a $6 million California Energy Commission grant. Number five, building new distillation columns and related systems to produce high purity US Pharmacopoeia grade alcohol for sanitizers, known as USP grade, expected to begin operation in Q1 2022. Number six, installing five new stainless steel tanks for USP and high-grade alcohol storage and loadout, increasing our storage capacity by more than 250,000 gallons and providing flexibility for operation of the new systems at the plant. When completed, these upgrades are designed to potentially eliminate petroleum natural gas use at the alcohol plant, saving up to $7 million per year of natural gas and utility pipeline transmission costs. The California fire refinery will primarily operate using high-efficiency electric motors and pumps powered by renewable power sources, including solar. These projects at the Keyes plant are targeted to significantly reduce carbon intensity by reducing petroleum natural gas usage and costs, while increasing the number of California low carbon fuel standard credits generated each year. The potential combined impact of these projects is expected to be more than $20 million per year increase in operating cash flow at the Keyes plants, not including the increased value of high-grade alcohol produced by the new distillation unit. Let's review our biodiesel business in India. Last quarter, our universal biofuels subsidiary in India did on a portion of the newly issued $900 million biodiesel purchase order for about 225 million gallons by the three India government oil marketing companies. In the past, the OMC bidding process required a one-year fixed price for biodiesel. However, the OMC bidding process for biodiesel was not successful in 2020 due to a high level of volatility in crude oil and other markets. So in response to requests by biodiesel producers, including Aemetis, the OMC contracting process has been changed to a monthly bid instead of a one-year contract with a fixed price. We expect that the new monthly OMC bidding process will be successful during 2021, allowing large volumes of biodiesel to be blended into petroleum diesel to improve air quality and reduce carbon emissions in India. Our production capacity at the India plant is about 4 million gallons of biodiesel per month. The large oil marketing companies' tender offer that was issued in late 2020 is an indication of their rapidly expanding government demand for biodiesel in India to reduce dependence on imported crude oil, improve air quality, and reduce carbon emissions. The entire production capacity of the approximately five India biodiesel production plants is about one-third of the amount of biodiesel requested to be purchased by the government oil marketing companies last year, signaling to the market that additional biodiesel capacity is needed to meet India biofuels consumption needs. Importing biodiesel into India is not allowed under the National biofuels policy, so only domestic production can meet the approximately 1.25 billion gallons per year of biodiesel blending, which is a goal set by the government. Currently, there's about 250 million gallons of India domestic biodiesel production capacity and we believe that Aemetis produced and sold a large amount of any operating biodiesel plant in India during 2020, while the industry waited for government OMC purchasing, which was delayed for nine months due to the COVID-19 shutdowns in India. Though the global price of diesel declined along with the price of crude oil as crude fell below $30 per barrel, the domestic price of diesel in India remained largely unchanged due to increased India government taxes that offset crude oil price declines. As global crude oil prices increased to more than $64 per barrel today, the price of diesel has also increased in India as the government is maintaining the same level of taxes. Since our biodiesel is sold at a price linked to India domestic diesel prices, our biodiesel prices in India have increased as global crude oil prices have increased. The rising cost of feedstock relative to the price accepted by the government OMCs is the remaining primary barrier to operation of our India biodiesel plant at full capacity, which will generate more than $150 million of annual revenues. Due to the COVID-related increase in demand, the refined glycerin prices received by our India plant have increased in response to the need for hand sanitizer and other consumer products. Let's discuss our carbon zero renewable jet and diesel fuel projects using negative carbon intensity hydrogen in Riverbank, California. We were pleased that the Aemetis carbon zero bio refinery under development in Riverbank, California near Modesto continues to achieve major milestones, including an expected issuance of the initial authority to construct under our original air permit application. Though further amendments are planned as a part of final construction engineering, the authority to construct air permit will allow us to move forward with final EPC agreements and financing. The California Central Valley has about 1.5 million acres of almond and walnut orchards. Almond orchards have about a 20-year life and then must be removed, creating about 3 billion pounds per year of waste wood, which is usually burned in large piles in the field since there's no market for most of the waste material. The Aemetis Riverbank project signed a 20-year fixed price low-cost orchard wood waste contract to supply feedstock to the renewable jet and diesel plant for the production of negative carbon intensity cellulosic hydrogen to be used with distillers corn oil and other renewable oils to reduce the low zero carbon intensity renewable jet diesel fuel. The Riverbank plant is designed to produce 45 million gallons per year of renewable jet and diesel, generating more than $230 million of annual revenue and more than $65 million per year of positive cash flow. We plan to expand production to 90 million gallons per year at the Riverbank site by year 2025 in our five-year plan. The Riverbank plant is designed to use waste orchard wood and other waste biomass such as dead forest, which is becoming a major issue for California as the state has prioritized forest management to reduce damaging wildfires. Let's wrap up with a quick review of a newly issued exclusive patent and a milestone achieved by our technology development group in fueling an ethanol engine with cellulosic ethanol produced from sugar extracted from waste orchard wood. The Aemetis technology development and strategic projects teams worked with the federally funded joint bioenergy institute in Berkeley, California for three years in the development of a patented process to extract sugars from low-cost waste orchard and forest wood feedstocks. The process has been exclusively licensed to Aemetis for wood and other biomass from non-commercial forest. The negative carbon intensity sugars can then be used to produce high-value cellulosic biofuels in the Aemetis Keyes ethanol plant, displacing expensive and carbon-intensive cornstarch as feedstock to produce ethanol. A $3 million California energy commission grant was awarded to J Bay and Aemetis, which partially funded the years of collaborative work and lab testing. Then in Q2 2020, this resulted in the production of the first carbon negative fuel ethanol from California orchard wood using ionic liquids. During the third quarter of 2020, our cellulosic ethanol was used to fuel the operation of an ethanol engine that generated the same performance and low emissions as a traditional ethanol used in testing. The ethanol engine technology was originally developed at Stanford University and is a modified diesel engine design. The engine takes advantage of the high octane content of ethanol to generate about 30% more torque or pulling power than an engine running on diesel while creating almost no particulates and very low emissions since ethanol contains a lower level of contaminants compared to petroleum. The patented sugar extraction process allows the sugar component of low-cost waste wood to be used to replace cornstarch in an existing corn ethanol plant, such as the Keyes plant, producing both high-grade alcohol as well as cellulosic ethanol that are each currently valued at more than $5 per gallon. Importantly, this process innovation to extract sugar from waste, which is scheduled to be implemented at our existing California ethanol plant in Keyes, decreasing the cost of corn feedstock and substantially increasing the value of our ethanol. We expect to move forward with a pilot project to extract sugars from locally sourced orchard and forest wood waste during 2021 with the expectation of commercial operations to pre-extract sugars from waste wood when the Riverbank renewable jet diesel plant becomes operational. In summary, Aemetis is a leading diversified negative carbon intensity dairy RNG and low carbon renewable fuels producer that is rapidly deploying new projects and adopting new technology to reduce carbon intensity and input costs, thereby significantly increasing the value of renewable natural gas and fuels by maximizing LCFS, RFS, and IRS 45Q credits. Now let's take a few questions from our call participants. Kate?

Our first question today is coming from Amit Dayal at H.C. Wainwright.

On the renewable natural gas efforts, could you talk about your contribution from the two completed dairy digesters in the fourth quarter, if any? And how should we think about deployments for the additional 15, 16 for the next year or so? And any color on changes to expectations around CapEx requirements, et cetera, related to this? Just an update would be very helpful. Thank you.

The process of recognizing revenue from our dairy renewable natural gas involves a three-month measurement period for the amount of biogas produced, followed by three to six months for verification and approval from the California Resources Board. We receive actual approval but retroactively start recognizing revenue from an earlier quarter. This means we anticipate revenue generation to begin in the second quarter of 2021, reflecting activities from October 1, 2020. Essentially, there's a six-month delay before the revenue is reported. Although we aren't showing significant revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020 or expecting them in the first quarter of 2021 unless we make some accruals, the revenues are still being generated. We appreciate the cooperation from CARB; shortly after our startup in mid-September, we began earning credits from October 1. The California Resources Board has been invaluable in ensuring these projects can operate without a lengthy wait for revenue. The option to revert to the original startup date is crucial for the rapid expansion of these projects, and the CARB team has played a significant role in this. We are planning to expand by adding 15 more dairies in 2021, which we expect to have operational by the end of the second quarter of 2022. Each of these dairies will undergo the same six-month approval process. Generally, if a startup occurs mid-quarter, there might be a delay in some initial revenue recognition. However, we are planning to have revenue start shortly after startup, while the markets will see a lag of about six months. This revenue won't appear in our financial statements immediately, and we might handle some accruals as we approach actual approval. By the second quarter of 2022, we expect all 17 dairies to be operational and generating cash flow exceeding $40 million. The cash flow will ramp up because we will have dairies coming online in the next 12 months, but the six-month verification process remains a part of this timeline.

And I know you've previously indicated that funding for the Phase 1 and 2, probably you already have those. But for Phase 3 of the 35 digesters in Phase 3, how are you thinking about funding those deployments?

Phase 3 is in the aggregate 35 dairies; whether we decide to break that into two parts or not, we'll make a decision on later on this year. But to simplify, what we will be generating is over $40 million of cash flow from Phase 1 and Phase 2, and we are expecting $75 million of USDA debt funding, which enables us actually to not only fund fully Phase 1 and Phase 2 but also prepare ourselves well for Phase 3 because of the infrastructure we're putting in place. You don't have to rebuild the pipeline; that will be at the time 35 miles of pipeline. So adding additional dairies to that pipeline, in some cases, might be only a matter of running a quarter mile of pipeline. You don't have to put 35 miles of pipeline in place, and centralized dairy hub, gas cleanup, interconnection with utility, all those are already in place, and the renewable natural gas dispensing stations is already in place. So our capital expenditure for Phase 3 is somewhat less and is driven by the cash flow we're getting from Phase 1 and Phase 2, which enables us to use basically debt instruments. Currently, the USDA renewable energy for America program is ideally suited for the $75 million of build-out that we're doing over the next 18 months. But our existing institutional investors have strongly supported the project, have already funded $30 million, and are already working with us to extend us an additional $25 million on the same terms. This is equity, and we have an expectation that that would certainly be available to us at any time. They've been extraordinarily supportive of the project and continue to be very bullish about how important it is, frankly, that we execute on time. I would say that in addition to the $75 million, to have their $25 million in place gives us over $100 million of capital. If you look at our budget, we only need about half of that, so we're substantially overfunded by probably $50 million more than what we actually need to deploy to do Phase 1 and Phase 2, which positions us very well to make strides on Phase 3 in the next five quarters.

Eric, how should investors think about offtake agreements or supply agreements with customers who will potentially be buying this renewable natural gas from you?

Currently, our strategy is to capture all of the $137 to $142 of revenue per MMBTU Million British Thermal Units by putting it into our own renewable natural gas trucks or our own dispensing fueling station on site. We, of course, can sell into the utility pipeline and market to anybody in California, but the economics of that are less attractive. The margins are excellent; it's certainly a fine situation to find yourself in. But we think that there's easily another probably at full project scale, $15 million per year of revenue that we don't have to give to other parties in order to dispense RNG. So we're working on a business model that would allow us to use as much of it as possible internally, and then have one or two outside parties who would be able to use whatever's leftover. We're looking at this as 52 dairies over 60 months. When we're done with 52 dairies, we're looking to optimize the return on investment, which potentially would mean that we consume all the renewable natural gas with our internal requirements for truck fueling and even potentially some in the ethanol plant because we will need a small amount in the ethanol plant. Our model is to optimize the return on investment and minimize dependence on third parties.

With respect to sort of the debt side of the story, I know you've previously highlighted efforts to convert a large portion of the existing debt to low interest debt. Is that something that could play out in 2021? Any updates on that front would be helpful.

There are two primary paths that we're taking for our existing bridge loan debt, which is what we've been using to build these projects. Number one is we have an ongoing program; we've already raised about $39.5 million under which is an approximately 1% interest rate program under EB-5, and we have an additional $172 million approved under the exemplar under that program. Yes, it's true; we could make tremendous strides on that anywhere from $25 million to $172 million of that could be funded this year. It's all really dependent mostly on how immigration policy is going. Under the previous administration, there were some significant concerns related to immigration policy, and so investors were reluctant to put themselves in a situation of having invested but then couldn't get the paperwork process. I think that that tone has changed significantly. There is an upside opportunity where some amount of that $172 million is funded this year, and it all goes for senior debt conversion into 1% interest rate subordinated debt. Now why is that valuable? Because we can put senior debt in place; it's just that senior debt would have $172 million of additional equity underneath it from the perspective of lenders. And so that process is ongoing. Again, we have almost $40 million of that capital we’ve already received at approximately 1% interest rate. The second is that we have expected restructuring arrangements with a potential new refinancing that could be easily tax-free bonds over 20-year amortization. Certainly, there's an expectation that the Department of Energy is actually serious about carbon reduction. With Jennifer Granholm and Jigar Shah now in control of $40 billion of federal money, I am looking for them to demonstrate with cash that they're actually serious about their proposals about carbon intensity reduction in the United States. As you know from our company, we are one of the few diversified below zero carbon companies in the market today, and $500 million DoE funding similar to Tesla's $475 million funding would be the appropriate indication by the current administration that they're actually serious about carbon reduction. We're giving them that opportunity; we'll see whether they have the foresight and appetite to respond to that opportunity. Debt restructuring with expansion capital stretched out over a very long period of time at low interest rates would be certainly the goal.

Just going back to the renewable natural gas digester deployments, Eric. Have you had any issues, etc., with those deployments? The two deployments you've completed, has everything been running smoothly relatively?

Everything has been running very smoothly. The advantage of the renewable natural gas business is that there are essentially no operations involved; it mainly consists of electric motors that push gas around and through filters. Therefore, we haven't had any significant operational activities to report, especially when compared to running an ethanol plant where you physically move mash and 4.5 million gallons of fermentation. This is a very simple business. We have a complete maintenance team and a full operations management team in place, so nothing has been particularly difficult here.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Derrick Whitfield at Stifel.

Eric, perhaps at a high level with my first question, as you think about your five year outlook on Page 11. What are the greatest execution or regulatory risks embedded in this plan in your view? And I asked this because the market is seemingly over-risking this plan in light of your valuation versus market peers.

The risk of execution here is really just frankly built around whether the US federal government employs the Renewable Fuel Standard the way Congress intended. The last time the federal Renewable Fuel Standard was enforced was in 2013. In the last four quarters in which the RFS was enforced, our existing ethanol plant bought corn from the same suppliers, sold ethanol to the same customers, and made $40 million of positive cash flow, over four quarters about $10 million per quarter. That is the structure under which further investment and expansion of low carbon and below zero carbon renewable fuels was designed to occur. For a combination of political reasons, the renewable fuel standard was just not enforced for three years. They did not announce the renewable volume obligations. Under the last administration, they actively issued waivers to oil companies that were deemed to eventually be illegal, just as not issuing volume obligations that seem to be illegal. There are two federal court cases that said the EPA violated the law not one way but twice, and a total of 7.2 billion gallons of ethanol demand disappeared as a result. The current administration has an opportunity; it's just simply don't violate federal law for renewable fuels, and you will have a very strong cycle of investment in the over 1 billion tons of waste biomass available in the US under $40 per ton. That's the cycle we're in, and our company we believe is a leader in that cycle.

As my follow-up regarding the cellulosic sugar extraction process from orchard waste wood. Could you speak to the event path for the commercialization of this development, and also speak to the downstream constraints, if any, for the utilization of this sugar in place of corn starch at your Keyes plant?

First of all, the economics of this are not reflected in our five-year plan. We are just disclosing this along the way to additional profitability of our Keyes plant. If you look at our Keyes plant over the next five years, we're not expecting rapid operational expansion in that business. This is all upside to the five-year plan. The next step of scaling this up is a pilot plant, and we already have two different grants pending in the application process with the US Forest Service, a division of the US Department of Agriculture, to fund the pilot plant, and we would be looking to get that construction going this year, be up and operating next year. After the pilot plant, the next scale up would be to commercial production. This is a pre-extraction of sugar from waste wood. So think of that as coming in from the field, and the first thing you do is you put it through a pre-extraction process to extract sugars. The reason why this isn't used widely in the industry is that up to 75% of your waste wood is still remaining; it's a waste product from the sugar extraction. Unless you have something to do with just tons of waste wood, you never can do the sugar extraction economically. We happen to have it; it's called the jet diesel plant. We use that waste wood to make renewable hydrogen that is used in hydro treating edible oils and animal oils to make renewable jet diesel. We have a valuable use for the remaining waste wood. Our commercial operations would be scaled to occur at the same time as our jet and diesel plant operation startup.

Again, just to clarify, I think with every 10% increase in utilization of cellulosic sugar, which again is not your numbers, there will be a $30 million EBITDA increase. Are there any limitations around how much of this sugar can be used at the Keyes plant?

Yes, our Keyes plant is basically a facility to seed sugar to yeast. That's what we're doing; we take starch, treat it with enzymes that break them down into sugars. We are just not using corn starch-based sugars; we take starch, treat it, and we use an upgraded yeast. Those are currently on the marketplace as well. It is directly linear; in other words, there's no tapering off. As we pass 20%, downside yield is not tapped. Instead of using corn starch-based sugars, we use wood to produce the six-carbon sugar, and the five-carbon sugars as well. So there is some modification of the yeast if we were going to use, for example, 50% of wood material; it would be a higher percentage of five-carbon sugars. We would be using an upgraded yeast, but those upgraded yeasts are already in the marketplace. It’s directly linear. What most people don't appreciate is that we spend almost $15 million per month buying corn; that's a variable price. When you can displace 10% of something costing you $15 million a month, that's $18 million per year just in corn savings. You have carbon intensity reduction, which means that our ethanol is worth more. We're selling our ethanol at over $6.50 a gallon instead of $1.80 or $2 a gallon; it's the same for the molecule, but simply came from a different feedstock with lower carbon intensity. As of yesterday, you're getting a D3 cellulosic renewable identification number, which is worth $2.90 a gallon versus $1.30. You have an additional value from the D3 RIN driving the price.

Extremely impactful. That's very helpful. Thanks for your time.

I want to repeat for everybody that is not in our five-year projection. It is all upside, and as we get closer over the course of the year and into next year, we'll update people about timing. All of that $30 million per 10% will be an upgrade to our five-year plan.

Our next question today is coming from Ed Woo at Ascendiant Capital.

Great, congratulations on all the progress that you made on all the various projects you're working on. Recently you decided or you announced that you made an investment in an EV company? Are we going to expect you guys to do more in that area?

We're in the business of electric vehicles. The market just doesn't understand it yet, and here's why. When you make electricity, it doesn't just magically show up. It is actually a molecule that's converted to an electron. What are the molecules we currently use? We use carbon-intensive coal, and worldwide that is the most rapidly growing source of our electricity, which produces a tremendous amount of carbon that goes into the atmosphere. We use petroleum natural gas, which again was carbon to the ground in the form of petroleum, and once it's combusted, it ends up in the atmosphere. I think most people would agree that a positive 100 carbon intensity, which is higher than gasoline and higher than diesel, is probably not a great way to make electricity either. But over 50% of electricity in the United States is made by coal or petroleum natural gas. Our dairy renewable natural gas, which is negative 416 carbon intensity, is an offset to the greenhouse gases going up in the atmosphere from coal and from petroleum natural gas. The more electricity we make from natural gas that comes from CO2 that was absorbed from the atmosphere into a plant, then eaten by it into an animal, in this case, a dairy cow, captured this biogas from the waste, and converted into electrons, the more of that we do, the greener those Tesla motor cars and lucid cars and electric trucks are going to be because that's how you actually help carbon emissions. You don't help carbon emissions by running your Tesla motor car on coal. Our expectation is the market will increasingly understand that those carbon negative biogas molecules are tremendously aligned with the electric car revolution; I would almost say they are necessary in order to expand electric car adoption and trucks. Let me give you the second and more important, and more direct, and more immediate application; batteries are heavy, expensive, and take up space. They take a long time to charge. If you solve one or two of them, say quick charging, they are still expensive, take up space, and are still heavy. You've got to solve all four of those before you really have long-haul trucking like Class A trucks that are on the highway or even delivery trucks that are carrying substantial amounts of cargo that are going to be willing to displace that cargo for batteries. They're heavy, expensive, and difficult to charge. The solution is having an electric drivetrain, a very efficient and high-torque powerful drivetrain, having batteries that carry the energy to power the drive train. But instead of having to park that truck for hours every day finding some charging place station that doesn't exist, have a dense 100% renewable carbon low or negative, cheap molecule that you can fuel that vehicle within a few minutes. So what is that molecule? In the United States, there are really only three fuels. There's gasoline and diesel made from crude oil, which is positive 93 and positive 95 carbon intensity, and there's ethanol which we all know has 40%-60% lower carbon intensity than gasoline according to current studies, even from corn. With the Aemetis ethanol, we are probably the lowest carbon intensity corn ethanol in the world, and then carbon negative ethanol from our cellulosic ethanol. If you know there are three fuels, two of them are non-renewable and heavy carbon, and the other one is cheap and readily available; it is called ethanol. What should be the range extender engine on your truck or other vehicle that needs to go farther than 100 to 200 miles? It's pretty easy to understand; it's going to be ethanol. Ethanol is only one molecule and has no sulfur. There’s no sulfur dioxide, unlike gasoline, which has over 400 molecules in it when it combusts and that has a tremendous number of issues. If you're going to run an ethanol truck, what's the range extender going to be? It's going to be renewable natural gas, carbon negative, very low emissions; or it's going to be ethanol, low carbon, very low emission. This engine could meet the zero emission vehicle standards even though it's an internal combustion engine because the fuel, ethanol, is one molecule and does not create all of these different emissions. We think that what we're producing is required in order to have an electrified future; not an option, not a temporary bridge, it is the future of how you can have electrified infrastructure between electrons we make as well as the range extenders we make.

Our final question today is coming from Marco Rodriguez at Stonegate Capital Partners.

Eric, I was wondering if maybe you could spend a little bit more time just on kind of the five-year plan that you guys have sketched out in your presentation. Just kind of wondering if you can maybe help frame the total CapEx that would be necessary for you guys to ramp that particular plan. And if you can maybe talk a little bit about the timing of that CapEx would be kind of helpful. Thanks.

We haven't put out a balance sheet to line up with the five-year plan. We will be working on doing that just to provide some guidance for everybody. We did include all those in our financial projection in terms of interest calculations and everything else, so the numbers are there derivatively through the income statement. But we think about it on a business unit basis. Dairy renewable natural gas, as we discussed, is basically just using USDA funding which is about ten-year funding and it's a very low interest rate. The renewable energy for America program is limited to $25 million blocks. Let's say we put five dairies in a given project; they get a senior loan against it and then you amortize it out over 10 years. Because cash flow is strong, we easily build up a lot of cash from that entity. So what do we do with that cash? We use it to fund the next five dairies and the next dairies. Essentially we're fully funded for the entire project just on the first $75 million from the USDA and can go back and get another $25 or $50 million if needed. It’s a self-funding mechanism using debt. The CapEx is kind of an interesting factor, but what's more interesting to me is if there's a dilution to shareholders involved. The answer is no. There's no dilution to our parent company shareholders at all. Even in our preferred stock structure, it is automatically redeemable by cash flow and there's no interest rate given the substantial just related to our preferred stock. It’s a self-financing entity without any dilution of parent company, and the numbers that you see in our five-year projection consider the interest costs, etc. The renewable jet and diesel plant similarly structured; we've invested about $15 million of actual cash. We have some additional assets; for example, a 142-acre site, part of that site is where the ethanol plant would go and that site has 710,000 square feet of buildings on it. We’ll contribute additional assets to that project. Our goal is simply to use tax-free bonds 20-year device or USDA or DoE funding to complete that financing without any additional equity, because we have sufficient equity to meet the requirements based on our analysis. The renewable jet diesel plant Phase 1 would be fully equity-funded already. Phase 2 would be to take cash flow, which we've described as being in excess of $65 million a year and use that as the extra equity if any is required to do the expansion. It's an operating plant that's going to build a second unit. We will just use cash flow from the first unit plus additional debt to do the second unit. Again, no dilution to the parent company. Our net contribution to this is all the development funding, which in that case was $15 million. In almost five years, we funded that. We’ll have some additional development funding that we’ll put in place. The overall plan is to build our business without having to dilute parent company shareholders and by achieving that using intelligent debt instruments. We think we're going to maximize shareholder value; India, by the way, is debt-free fully built out for 50 million gallons. There's no capital expenditures required there at all.

We do have a question coming from Jordan Levy at Truist Securities.

Just wanted to quickly get your thoughts on the potential for the renewable hydrogen outside of feeding into the renewable diesel, renewable jet plant, and how you see that kind of structure and technology fitting into a lot of the news flow we see on the hydrogen side of things?

We carefully evaluated the option of generating renewable hydrogen from orchard waste wood to create a carbon-negative product for market sale. Our Board of Directors includes industry leaders, and our shareholder base reflects that expertise. After thorough analysis, we found that there are fewer than 10,000 hydrogen vehicles and under 50 fueling stations in California. We engaged with major automotive companies to understand their timelines for fueling stations and vehicle deployments, concluding that our potential renewable hydrogen production would far surpass market demand. We would need to rely on significant future market growth over one to four years. Ultimately, we decided to utilize a byproduct from our Keyes ethanol plant, which is low-carbon, non-edible distillers corn oil, applying standard hydro treating technology common in oil refining to inject hydrogen into corn oil. Thus, we chose to invest time, energy, and resources into producing low-carbon or carbon-negative jet and diesel fuels. In the U.S., there are about 12 billion gallons of diesel consumed by trucks, providing an opportunity to replace every gallon and obtain LCFS credits in California, along with federal renewable standard RINs for others. California has a market capable of handling 4 billion gallons without a blending wall. This approach focuses on using renewable diesel molecules that come from new carbon sources. We also identified a global market of 79 billion gallons for jet fuel. Supportive policies for aviation fuel are anticipated. To enhance our capabilities, we decided to add a unit to produce sustainable aviation fuel up to 50% of our total capacity. This strategy places us in a low-risk position, as we are likely to offer the lowest carbon content renewable diesel globally, and potentially the same for our SAF. Many airlines have shown strong interest in our low-carbon SAF, especially since it is produced with carbon-negative petroleum hydrogen, contrasting with the high carbon intensity of traditional petroleum hydrogen. We see significant value in this market and opted to invest further to tap into the growing demand, rather than putting our shareholders at risk in a slow-growing market hindered by limited vehicles and fueling infrastructure for hydrogen.

Thank you. That's all the time we have for questions today. I would like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

Thank you, Kate. I appreciate it. Thanks to everyone for joining us today. We will be posting the audio and transcript on our website. I encourage you to visit the investor section of our website, where you can find an earnings-focused presentation that includes slides specifically discussing 2020, as well as slides outlining our five-year plan. I want our shareholders to be well informed about the company's plans for the next five years, as this knowledge will help you be more effective as shareholders. I also look forward to speaking with you; please feel free to email me, and if possible, we can arrange a time to discuss over the phone. Thank you for participating in today's Aemetis earnings conference call. Please check the Investors section of the Aemetis website for the written and audio versions of this earnings review and business update.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference event. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.