Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Thank you. Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, LP, Third Quarter 2026 Results Conference Call and Webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, David Krant, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Shannon, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' third quarter, 2026 earnings conference call. As introduced, my name is David Krant, and I am the Chief Financial Officer of Brookfield Infrastructure. I'm joined today by our Chief Executive Officer, Sam Pollack, and our Chief Operating Officer, Ben Vaughan. Also joining us today is Dave Joint, a managing partner in our investments team, and Leif Williams, a managing director focused on AI infrastructure investments. I'll begin the call today with a discussion of our financial and operating results, followed by a discussion of our asset sale initiatives and balance sheet strength. I'll turn the call over to Sam, then, who will discuss our capital deployment activity and provide an outlook for the business. Now, at this time, I'd like to remind you that in our remarks today, we may make forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, and the future results may differ materially. For further information on known risk factors, I've encouraged you to review our latest annual report on Form 20F, which is available on our website. Now, beginning with our financial and operating results, we're pleased to report that we generated FFO of $717 million, or 91 cents per unit. This marks the third consecutive quarter in which we've achieved our 10% FFO per unit growth target. The increase was driven by strong organic growth at the high end of our target range, supported by inflationary price increases, strong asset utilizations, and the commissioning of approximately $1.4 billion of capital projects from our backlog. Results also benefited from contributions from new investments completed over the last 12 months. Which continues to generate returns above the lost yield from asset sales completed over the same period. I'll now go through our results by segment in a little more detail, starting with our utilities, where we generated FFO of $200 million, an increase of 5% over the prior year. The increase was driven by inflation indexation and the contribution of approximately $600 million of capital commissioned into rate-based. Results also benefited from recent acquisitions, including our South Korean industrial gas business and our New Zealand energy infrastructure platform. These contributions were partially offset by foregone earnings from asset sales completed over the last 12 months. Moving to transport, where FFO was $315 million, representing a 10% increase over the year. The increase was driven by volume strength in our port operations, increased volumes in tariffs on our toll roads, and a contribution from the acquisition of our North American rail car leasing platform. Results were impacted by foregone earnings from asset sales completed in the prior year, including the sale of our Australian container terminal and a partial sale of our UK port operation. In midstream, our FFO was $178 million, up 14% compared to the prior year. Thank you. The increase reflects strong organic growth across the portfolio, particularly at our Canadian diversified midstream business, which benefited from strong asset utilization and elevated commodity prices. Results also reflected a full quarter contribution from our U.S. refined products pipeline, which we acquired in the third quarter of 2025. Compared with the partial Thank you. Lastly, FFO from our data segment was $172 million, representing a 25% increase over the prior year. The increase was driven by strong organic growth across the segment, including contributions from our partnership with Intel to develop semiconductor foundries in Arizona, following the completion of our equity funding during the quarter. Results also included a full-quarter contribution from our U.S. bulk fiber network, which we acquired in the third quarter of 2020. I'll now turn to an update on our asset sales, and on a year-to-date basis, you note we have secured nearly $1.5 billion of proceeds. We are also nearing binding offers on several advanced sale processes that could generate over $1 billion of incremental proceeds net to the partnership before year-end. In parallel, we continue to advance additional monetization opportunities, which position us for a strong start in 2027 for our capital recycling. In terms of our balance sheet, our approach to financing remains straightforward. Maintain conservative leverage, extend maturities when opportunities arise, and ensure our businesses have the financial flexibility to perform through market cycles. Today, more than 90% of our debt, excluding Brazil, is fixed rate, and our debt maturities are well staggered. This provides meaningful protection against movements in interest rates and allows us to focus on operating and growing our operations. At the corporate level, we have approximately 3.2 billion dollars of liquidity. Together with our access to a broad range of capital markets and limited near-term refinancing requirements, this puts us in an excellent position. We have the flexibility to fund our existing growth initiatives and the capacity to pursue new investments when attractive opportunities arise. And with that, that concludes my remarks for this morning. I'll now turn the call over to Sam.

Thank you, David, and good morning, everyone. Building on the progress David just outlined, we've also been active in deploying capital. Year-to-date, we deployed approximately $1.8 billion of equity across new investments and organic growth projects, and we remain on track to deploy over $2 billion in 2026. One of the most compelling aspects of our business today is the growing scale and breadth of organic investment opportunities within our portfolio. Across our four segments, we are deploying capital to expand utility systems, increase capacity in our transport networks, enhance our midstream capabilities, and develop data infrastructure to support accelerating demand for digital connectivity. So far in 2026, we have invested approximately $700 million of equity into organic growth projects. These projects leverage our existing asset base. Established customer relationships and operating expertise, allowing us to deploy capital at attractive risk-adjusted returns with greater visibility and lower execution risk. Alongside this organic activity, investment across AI infrastructure continues to accelerate, adding to our established pipeline of M&A in traditional sectors. The significant capital required to develop AI factories, deploy and compute capacity, And secure associated energy infrastructure is creating new avenues for us to deploy capital, particularly through strategic partnerships of leading global corporations. This momentum is reflected in our recently signed agreement formalizing a strategic partnership with Naver to develop sovereign AI capabilities, including over 200 megawatts of compute capacity One of the largest AI factories in Asia Pacific. As part of the partnership, we will finance and own the compute capacity through a dedicated leasing company with contracted cash flows providing a return on and full recovery of our invested capital over the initial contract term. The first GPU deployment is expected in the first half of 2027 with full deployment by the end of 2028. BIF's expected equity commitment It's approximately $100 million. Now, beyond Naver, our growing pipeline of actual investment opportunities gives us confidence in achieving our forward-looking objective of deploying approximately $500 million of capital on average annually in AI infrastructure. Most recently, we entered into a strategic partnership with Drax to potentially develop a large-scale AI factory in the United Kingdom. So with that, let me now turn to the Outlook. We remain confident in our ability to close out the year with strong financial performance and achieve our 10% FFO per unit growth target. A key focus is converting our expanding investment pipeline into new capital deployment. We're advancing opportunities across sectors and geographies through both traditional M&A and strategic capital partnerships, providing multiple avenues to deploy capital and attractive risk-adjusted returns. Our scale operating expertise and track record have established Brookfield as a partner of choice for leading global corporations seeking long duration capital and an aligned operating partner. This position provides access to differentiated investment opportunities that often arise from relationships developed over many years rather than competitive options. Another key priority is completing the announced corporate simplification. Following the successful BIP unit holder and BIP C shareholder votes, we have now received all required approvals and expect the simplification to close on November 19th. Following closing and subject to approval by its Board of Directors, BIP Bank intends to declare and pay a fourth quarter dividend on its Class A shares in an amount consistent with BIP's current quarterly distribution of 45.5 cents per unit. We believe the simplified structure will make Brookfield Infrastructure easier to own, improve consolidated trade and liquidity, broaden our investor base, and support increased index demand. This concludes my remarks, and I'll pass it now back to the operator, and we'd be happy to take some questions.

Thank you. As a reminder to ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Sheryl and Radborn with TD Cowan. Your line is now open.

Thanks very much and good morning. I was hoping to get some perspective on what the U.S. midterms mean, if anything, for the value of your in-place DC capacity and the development pipeline.

Hi, Sherilyn. Yeah, I guess we expected that question. Maybe I'll just make a couple quick comments, and we have Leif Williams from our AI strategy group here as well, and maybe I'll ask him just to get a general sense of what's happening these days in that sector. I think the two obvious things to say is that it's far too early to speculate on changes that might occur to regulation and other impacts to the sector, because we're still in a heightened political environment. But, you know, obviously, you know, to the extent that development slows down, which, frankly, you know, we expected it to slow down in any event because of constraints to supplies as well as capital. So I think that a slowdown was expected in any event. But, you know, to the extent that there is a Lower supply in the coming years, that's going to make existing assets more valuable. And so for businesses like C-Square, where we have it in place, set of data setters and customers providing compute, we expect rates to get higher and it should be good for the business. In terms of development, I think for, you know, developers who have a strong track record, access to capital, and strong local support, and that means having projects in the right jurisdictions, I think they will continue to be successful. And in our case, you know, we've been running our business extremely prudently. And maybe just to add to that, that's where I'll turn it over to LEAF, just to describe how we've been running the business to position ourselves for this particular environment.

Yeah, thank you, Sam. I think what I would add from a bipartisan perspective, a big area of focus has been ratepayer protection and really trying to ensure that from a grid perspective, the ratepayer is protected and from a power perspective, there's additionality. Now, that's a theme we've been looking forward to for the last 18 months. I would say if you look at the large three AI factory projects we've been advancing, so the Edmonton site, the Paducah site, and the Drax site in the UK, all three of those hit all of those attributes. And so we think that development will continue for the right projects to develop the right way, and that's really been the priority from our perspective.

Great. And for my second question, maybe flipping to a jurisdiction that's a bit more friendly at the moment, can you talk about what you think Build Canada Strong and the mega productivity deduction implies for your Canadian midstream business?

Okay, well, maybe I'll start there, and if any of my colleagues want to add, they can jump in as well. Look, I think as we've probably said on previous calls, the tone from the various governments over the last year has been trending positive. We've seen, both federally and provincially, a number of governments much more supportive of new projects, particularly projects out west. We think that there's a lot of momentum in the energy sector, in particular, to expand egress, both To Asia and South. And I think while we can't point to a number of projects yet, the direction of travel is positive. And so we remain optimistic that things will get done and that our pipeline today of Energy projects has probably never been larger and continues to be – our favourable view on the sector has not changed.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Maurice Choi with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Maybe let's take an even bigger picture as we talk about the changing policy and political landscapes around the world that seems to be quite rapid, not least being the U.S. Just keen to hear where you think you see the greatest opportunities and dislocations in any of the four pillars of business that you have.

Hi, Maurice.

Today, if we look from a geographic perspective, for the last couple of years, most of the opportunities have arisen out of the U.S., and a lot of that was driven by The explosion in data center activity, which led to behind-the-meter power opportunities, utility opportunities, as well as midstream, so a lot of that took place, and as we just said, I think we can expect that to continue, even if it's moderated somewhat. You know, the other theme that has been very prevalent has been, you know, energy security, and we just touched on that a little bit, I guess, with Sherilyn's question regarding, you know, projects in Canada, which really, I think, are being developed in response to energy security issues around the world. You know, we have... We participated in investments in New Zealand, where energy security was part of our CLARS thesis, and we're pursuing a number of opportunities in Europe related to that theme as well. So, I would say energy is still a big component. You know, there are opportunities in New York, in particular, and related to... Utilities, you know, not dissimilar to what we see here in North America. They have issues there as well with raising capital to invest in utilities so that they can expand transmission and distribution in particular, and so investments into rate-based opportunities are quite prevalent. And then on the transportation side, maybe I've got Dave Joynt here with me who runs our transportation business. Do you want to comment on where we see transportation opportunities?

Yeah, I would probably just make two comments on that. I think number one, despite what you might think, global trade continues to be really strong. And it's not just as direct as it was in the past where we go directly from factories in Asia and go directly into demand markets in Europe and North America, but it's actually making many steps kind of along the way. And so I think that overall demand for global trade just increases overall investment requirements in everything from ports to rail and other sort of like inland infrastructure assets. So I think overall that is probably very strong. And then I think the second thing that I would comment is another large theme continues to be around supply chain security. So beyond Sam's comments about energy security, people are also concerned about the security of their supply chains. And there are significant investments being made around the world in order to, whether it's reshore or simply to create captive supply chains in order to get their goods from their supply destinations to the end markets, a lot of investment in that market as well. It's 5.1 bucks.

Understood. Thank you very much for that. And if I could just finish off with a question on the corporate simplification, my congratulations to your team for the hard work in getting this across the line. And I just wanted to hear your sense as to when the benefits that you've outlined for this simplification may materialize timing-wise over the coming weeks, months, or quarters.

Hey, Maurice. It's David. Look, I think in terms of the benefits, it's going to be, and to remind everyone, we think there's a number of them, obviously, the combined company is going to have a much larger market cap, a bigger free flow, and therefore better trading liquidity. And so I would expect those benefits to come in from day one in terms of liquidity. People will have access to trade the shares, as we noted in our release yesterday from the 23rd onwards. And so I think that that's probably more imminent. Some of the other maybe medium to longer-term benefits in terms of index demand and flows will be harder to predict. It's based on our estimates. But we think that the initial benefits will be soon. And so we're really excited to have that.

That's great. Thank you very much for that.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Devin Dodge with the BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Yeah, thanks. Good morning. So I'm going to start with a question on Radiant. We started to see more of these arrangements with third parties to fund compute capacity. Including Brookfield's agreement with Navers. I know the total addressable market is really large, but just wondering how much of that is currently in discussion with technology companies, and how do you differentiate versus your competitors?

Yeah, sure. Thanks for the question, Devin. Look, I think you're right. The addressable market is significantly sized. I would say from a sheer dollars per megawatt perspective, the compute market is about three times larger than the data center market. So we see a tremendous addressable market, but I would say we're very focused on the Brookfield side and on the Radiant side, sticking to our knitting. And so this is take-or-pay contracts, full return on and of capital over the contract period, no technology risk, and investment-grade counterparties. The Naver transaction is a great example of that focus, and I would say you'll see more transactions like that from us over the coming quarters. From a differentiation perspective, I think you're starting to see that in the market right now. I think having access to capital in periods of volatility will be a difference maker. Capital is becoming more scarce, and I think that strong sponsors like Brookfield with deep access to capital will be able to take advantage of the volatility.

Okay, thanks for that. Second question is on ARC infrastructure. There was some legislation that came forward in Western Australia involving the renationalization of the freight network. At least to the extent that you're able, can you speak to where you are in those discussions with the government and what's the range of outcomes that are being considered?

Hi, Devin. I don't think we can really talk about that at the moment. I think the government has put forward legislation that allows them to have the opportunity to buy back, and those are conversations that we're having today, and we'll see where they end up.

Okay, got it. Thanks for that. I will turn it over.

Thank you. As a reminder to ask a question at this time, please press star 11 on your touchtone telephone. Our next question comes from the line of Frederick Bastien with Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Hi, good morning. Question on the NAVR partnership. Your $100 million equity commitment looks relatively modest against the $9 billion project size. Given that you typically invest alongside Brookfield and some institutional partners, can you give us a sense of the total equity commitment at the group level and perhaps clarify whether the $9 billion represents? Total project costs, including debt financing or equity alone.

Fred, hey, it's David. Yeah, so the $9 billion, I'll start backwards. The $9 billion is the total capital spend for the GPUs, and so that's the CapEx component. From an equity funding perspective, typical for these structures, you would have a loan to cost in the 80% range, maybe slightly lower than that, so you're probably around $1.75 billion of equity. And so we're estimating here, BIP share of that will be somewhere in the 5% to 10% we do expect to offer equity investments here to potential fund investors. And given we're in the fundraising process, it's hard to speculate on where that shakes out. But I'd say the investment, we wanted to put a number just so people had a sense of what to expect. So $100 million, maybe upwards to $200 million would be where we'd expect this to be.

And can you clarify what sort of investments you'd be looking at the group level, including Brookfield and your partners?

Plus or mod is $1.7 to $1.8 billion is the total equity into the deal.

And that's yours? That's the group level investment?

That's the group level, and as Dave mentioned, a portion of that will go into the fund, the AI fund, and then a portion will go to co-investors who are partners in the fund, and BIP will participate through the fund.

Okay, super. Okay, thanks for clarifying. My other question around, I guess you've been super active in data and certainly feels like investment opportunities are heating up in midstream. How's the opportunity set evolving across your two other segments, utilities and transport?

I would say if we had the rank sort of pace of deployment, data would still be the most active, followed by midstream. I think those are the two areas where we're seeing the most deal flow at the moment. And then probably transportation would be next, and then utilities. I'd say they can be lumpy, so the utility transactions tend to be larger, just less frequent, and so it's possible in any given year, we could have a large utility transaction, and there's some that we're pursuing at the moment, but they tend to be a little bit more sporadic, whereas the transportation side tend to be smaller deals, but But more often. So that's kind of the lay of the land. You know, it's always hard to speculate because we have, as you can appreciate, you know, a large number of transactions underway at any one particular time. And it's hard to predict which ones will become actionable and which ones, you know, might fall away for various reasons.

Thanks. I appreciate your answers.

Okay. Thanks, Fred.

Thank you. And I'm currently showing no further questions at this time. I'd now like to hand the call back over to Sam Pollack, Chief Executive Officer, for closing remarks.

All right. Thank you, Operator, for helping us out today. And thank you to everyone who joined the call. You know, I think we'd like to wish everyone a happy upcoming holiday season. And we look forward to providing you our fourth quarter and year-end results early in the new year. Thank you, and have a great weekend.

This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.