Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I would like to welcome all of you to Camtek's Results Zoom webinar. My name is Kenny Green and I'm part of the Investor Relations team at Camtek. All participants other than the presenters are currently muted. Following the formal presentation, I'll provide some instructions for participating in the question-and-answer session. I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded and the recordings will be available on Camtek's website from tomorrow. You should have all by now received the company's press release and if not, you can view it on the company's website. With me on the call today, we have Mr. Rafi Amit, Camtek’s CEO; Mr. Moshe Eisenberg, Camtek’s CFO; and Mr. Ramy Langer, Camtek's COO. Rafi will begin by providing an overview of Camtek's results and discuss recent market trends. Moshe will then summarize the financial results of the quarter. Following that, Rafi, Moshe, and Ramy will be available to take your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that certain information provided on this conference call are internal company estimates unless otherwise specified. This call may also contain forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions and may change as time passes. Statements on this call are made as of today and the company undertakes no obligation to update any of that information or any of those forward-looking statements contained, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in expectations, or otherwise. Investors are reminded that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected, including as a result of the effects of general economic conditions, risk related to the concentration of a significant portion of Camtek's expected business in certain countries, particularly China, from which Camtek expects to generate a significant portion of its revenues for the foreseeable future, but also Taiwan and Korea, including the risks of deviations from our expectations regarding timing and size of orders from customers in these countries. Changing industry and market trends, reduced demand for services and products, the timely development of new services and products and their adoption by the market, increased competition in the industry and price reductions, as well as due to other risks identified in the company's filings with the SEC. Please note that the Safe Harbor statements and today's press release also cover the contents of this conference call. In addition, during this call, certain non-GAAP financial measures will be discussed. These are used by management to make strategic decisions, forecast future results, and evaluate the company's current performance. Management believes that the presentation of non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors' understanding and assessment of a company's ongoing core operations and prospects for the future. A full reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial measure – GAAP financial measures are included in today's earnings release. And now I would like to hand the call over to Rafi Amit, Camtek’s CEO. Rafi, please go ahead.

Okay, thanks Kenny. Good morning or good afternoon everyone. Camtek ended this quarter with record quarterly revenue of $102.6 million, representing 40% growth compared with Q2 2023. The distribution of revenue in this quarter is over 50% of our sales were for high-performance computing-related products for the second quarter in a row. Approximately 15% for OSATs, mainly for Advanced Packaging, and the rest were split between silicon carbide, front-end CMOS Image Sensors, and other applications. This trend of product mix resulted in increased profitability and I am very pleased with the improvement of achieving a gross margin of 51% and operating margin of about 30%. The demand in the HPC segment is reflected in the PR we issued a few days ago with an announcement about receiving multiple systems order of over $25 million from a global Tier 1 customer to inspect HBM wafers. I am happy to share with you that since we issued the PR, this customer added $6 million, bringing the entire order to over $31 million. The industry trends regarding high-performance computing modules are also reflected in our view of our future revenue. Based on our current orders, flow, backlog, and pipeline, our revenue guidance for the third quarter is $107 million to $110 million, representing in the midpoint about 35% growth year-over-year. We expect continued growth in the fourth quarter as well. The main growth driver in the semiconductor market is HPC modules for generative AI, for which we are a key equipment provider. Our revenues in this quarter have grown three times since Q2 2023. From orders we have on hand, our pipeline, and discussions with customers, we expect demand for our system for HPC-related products to continue in the second half of 2024 and into 2025. HPC modules include mainly chiplets, HBM, and silicon substrates. The production technologies of HPC modules are developing rapidly, which requires our continued development of advanced and cost-effective solutions. For example, one of our new key challenges is measuring and inspecting wafers with an extremely high number of micron-level interconnects at a very fine pitch. The industry is moving from a pitch of tenths of micron to a single-digit pitch. Moreover, customers use more inspection steps to maintain high yield, and they are evaluating our systems in process steps we have not participated in before. So we can see high potential for expanding our business with our current and new generation systems. Our new generation systems that we completed developing are equipped with state-of-the-art sensors and optics to perform all types of inspection, 3D bumps measurement, and metrology that we believe will address the current and the next-generation HPC-related products at high volume manufacturing throughputs. We also expect OSATs to implement packaging capabilities for HPC. This trend will allow fabless and IDM companies to start producing HPC modules that will be suitable for AI and additional applications. We expect that our strong position within the OSATs will benefit us with this industry shift as well. Clearly, a major growth in demand for capital semiconductor equipment is generated from the reality where countries with leading economies such as the U.S., Japan, China, and Europe consider advanced semiconductor components as strategic national assets. Therefore, they expand their design and production capabilities by establishing new manufacturing facilities in their respective countries. Concerns regarding geopolitical changes only accelerate the decision of those countries to have local infrastructure for the manufacturing of semiconductor components. The strong order flow sum for delivery in 2025 and the high demand for HPC gives us a relatively clear long-term vision, which allows us to organize our operations efficiently to meet the expected demand. To sum it up, the demand for HPC together with industry analysts' forecasts for a growing demand for end products such as mobile phones and PCs and the establishment of new facilities in key countries make us believe that we will continue growing in 2025. And now Moshe will review the financial results. Moshe?

Thanks, Rafi. In my financial summary ahead, I will provide the results on a non-GAAP basis. The reconciliation between GAAP results and the non-GAAP results appears in the table at the end of the press release issued earlier today. Revenue for the first quarter came in at a record $102.6 million, an increase of 39% compared with the second quarter of 2023, and an increase of 6% from the first quarter of 2024. The geographic revenue split for the quarter was as follows: Asia, 92%. U.S. and Europe accounted for 8%. The higher-than-normal contribution from Asia relates mainly to the big demand for HBM, which is currently manufactured in Korea and Taiwan. Gross profit for the quarter was $52.4 million. The gross margin for the quarter improved to 51%, up from 50.6% in the first quarter of 2024 and 48% in the second quarter of last year. This is mainly due to a more favorable product mix in the quarter and our ongoing efforts to improve the cost structure of our products. We anticipate that gross margin will remain at a similar level in the coming quarters. Operating expenses in the quarter were $21.6 million, compared to $17.1 million in the second quarter of last year and $20.1 million in the previous quarter. The increase is mostly due to planned expansion to support the growth of operations. Operating profit in the quarter was $30.8 million, compared to $18.3 million reported in the second quarter of last year and $29 million in the previous quarter. The increase is mostly due to the increase in revenue and the improvement in gross profit. Operating margin was 30% compared to 24.8% and 29.9%, respectively. Financial income for the quarter was $5 million, slightly lower than the $5.8 million reported in the second quarter of last year and $5.6 million in the previous quarter. The decrease is mostly due to the lower cash balance following the $60 million dividend paid in April, slightly offset by the cash generated throughout the quarter. Net income for the second quarter of 2024 was $32.6 million, or $0.66 per diluted share. This is compared to a net income of $21.9 million, or $0.45 per share, in the second quarter of last year. The total diluted number of shares as of the end of the second quarter was 49.3 million. Turning to some high-level balance sheet and cash flow metrics, cash and cash equivalents including short and long-term deposits and marketable securities as of June 30, 2024, were $454 million. This compares with $466 million at the end of the first quarter. We generated $49 million in cash from operations in the quarter on the back of increased revenue and very strong collections. Inventory levels increased by $7 million to $109 million. The increase over the previous quarter is to support the anticipated sales growth in the coming quarters. Despite the increase in revenue, accounts receivable decreased from $86 million to $68.2 million in the quarter, as a result of strong collections in the quarter. Our days sales outstanding improved significantly from 81 days to 61 days. Finally, we expect revenue of between $107 million to $110 million in the third quarter with continued sequential growth in Q4. And with that, Rafi, Ramy, and I will be open to take your questions.

Thank you, Moshe. Our first question will be from Charles Shi of Needham. Charles, please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. The first question I want to ask, what's the thought? What's the current estimate from management on the overall contribution of HPC module for the full year?

Charles, I think as we discussed in previous meetings, we expect the overall contribution from HPC, or both HBM and chiplet modules, to account for anywhere between 50% to 60% for the entire year.

Okay. So let's say relative to like 90 days ago, is the percentage moving up? Or do you think it's still in a similar ballpark?

I think it's in a similar ballpark.

Okay. Thank you. Maybe the second question, do you see the HBM versus chiplet mix going into the second half? Any changes to that? Because you did disclose for Q1, roughly, HBM versus chiplet is a 2:1 ratio, but you didn't provide a number for Q2. If you can provide that number, that would be great. But more importantly, what would be the ratio of the second half?

So the ratios will change, will vary from one quarter to the other. In general, I think it will be more accurate to talk about the entire number, which will be anywhere between 50% to 60%. But overall, both markets are pretty stable.

Thank you. Maybe one other question for Moshe on gross margin. Definitely gross margin has been improving every quarter. Well, actually, since I would say the first quarter, 2023. What's the expectation for the next two quarters? 51% in June, which is great. But do you see sequential improvement from here for the next two quarters?

Indeed, gross margin has improved in the last several quarters. This was a result of ongoing efforts to improve the cost structure and obviously the product mix. We think that anywhere between 50% to 51.5% is a good range. You know, it's really depending on the product mix from quarter-to-quarter. So I don't want to commit now for the next couple of quarters, but this will be within this range that I’ve mentioned.

All right. Thank you.

Thanks, Charles. Our next question is going to be from Brian Chin of Stifel. Brian, please go ahead.

Hi there. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking a few questions. Maybe just a question on sort of your other more traditional and legacy businesses and like wafer-level packaging, specialty, et cetera. The implication this year is that 50%-ish of your revenue is maybe even down this year, year-on-year. Are you starting to see improvement, even sequentially on some of that revenue or kind of building some visibility towards growth in that business? Any kind of color you can provide would be helpful.

So Brian, we spoke about it and I can say that definitely we see improvement in our other businesses. Even this quarter in a sense is already, I think there is some improvement. And as you can see, our overall, what we saw for advanced packaging, it’s close to 70% compared to 80% it was last quarter. In this quarter, we’re starting to see some pickup on the OSAT business. Definitely, we’re getting good indications about some business from the CMOS Image Sensors. Overall I think next year we will see an improvement what we are reading, what we understand from customers that what we call our traditional businesses will definitely be better than this year.

Okay. That’s helpful. And back to the sort of like the AI packaging inspection and metrology business for you. Other companies, not necessarily even competitors of yours, who break out some of their customers or their business that they’re seeing. They’ve seen even this earnings season maybe, a lot of that business being dominated by a large Korean customer and then even seeing a bit of a period of digestion as that customer kind of takes a breather from buying and they’ve seen sort of maybe a pause in the business. Are you – in terms of your business, are you seeing more diversification across maybe the main HBM players? There’s a few people on the chiplet side. Are you seeing those kinds of trends or is it kind of more diversified in terms of your business?

So first of all, we – there was a discussion and we heard some comments about the pause or digestion. We did not see it. This is really more related to the relevant customers on the HPC segment. The steps that you are doing, it’s a little bit more complex. But at least from the business that we are doing with all the players on the HPC market, we do not see a pause. The business is stable. And I think as Rafi said in his remarks, in the prepared remarks, we definitely see this business continuing into 2025. So from that point of view, we do not see it.

Okay. And maybe just one last thing. When you have the press release to talk about the 25 million of HBM orders for the second half this year into next year. When that customer comes back and adds another 6 million on top of that, is that their misjudgment of the type of coverage that they need relative to maybe the challenges that they have in their business, or is there some other circumstance behind that?

So first of all, I’m not aware of the real reason, but these customers are big customers and it’s not going to be. They continue to buy machines and they will continue to buy machines. In this instance, there was some adjustments to the number as they felt that they wanted a few more machines. I think what you are seeing, and I think the sense is that our customers are predicting that this business is going to grow and they are ready to invest because they are very confident about their future business in the foreseeable future.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Brian. Our next question is going to be from Craig Ellis from B. Riley. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand on the platform. Craig, you may go ahead and ask.

Yes, thanks for taking the question. I wanted to start off just by asking a follow-up to Rafi given comments regarding expectations for OSATs to add HPC and chiplet-related capacity to be a bigger part of the supply chain there. The question is this, Rafi, where are we now in OSATs actually building out the degree of capacity that they’ll need? And how do you expect that to play out for Camtek, both in the second half of this year and in 2025 for your business?

Rafi, you want to answer? You want me to take this answer? I think…

Rafi, you’re on mute.

I’m sorry. I’m sorry. Yes, I’m sorry. I was on mute. Look, as we said, our visibility usually is in general it’s about two quarters ahead and over that we can read analyst forecasts and discussions with customers. They prepare their budget for next year in the coming few months. So based on all the information, as Ramy mentioned, as I mentioned, we definitely see that the HPC business continue growing. We mentioned, I think a few quarters that the analysts talk about over 20% growth in some products, even over 30% growth year-over-year. I must tell you that what we see today, this is the growth rate that we can see from our customers from discussions, but we don’t see any change right now. Now, and even the customer that just Ramy mentioned, he didn’t say this is for 2025, this is just what he needs today. He definitely predicts to place more orders in the next few months. So we are very optimistic about that type of product and we are organized for delivery.

Let me add, Craig, you spoke OSATs. We have definitely gained more knowledge today than we had a few weeks ago. Some of the capacity, referred to as the indiscernible capacity, is beginning to shift to OSATs. We are engaged in discussions with OSATs about business opportunities in 2025. This transition is underway and will materialize in 2025. As we are very strong in the OSAT sector, we view this as a positive development from our perspective.

Okay. So it sounds like, Ramy, if I’m hearing you and Rafi correctly, that the engagement with the broader ecosystem as well as with OSATs is in the realm of what we would call discussions for the pipeline. The pipeline is starting to look good. As the calendar clicks forward, we would expect that to convert into firm orders, as we’ve seen in the last month of July, where you had 45 million and now one upside by 6 million. Is that right?

In general, you're correct. I don't want to delve into specifics, but our pipeline is definitely looking promising, and it will start to translate into firm orders.

That’s helpful. And then the second question is for Moshe. So, Moshe, I think we’ve heard Rafi identified that business activity overall is lending the kind of visibility that results in more efficient operations. And I would expect that to be a tailwind for gross margins. But I know the company’s also been working hard on things like input costs and other manufacturing optimizations. As we look at the business now and as we look at the improvement in gross margin over the last year, how much of that is just volume versus some of the company controllables? And as we look ahead, what are the levers to drive gross margins incrementally higher from where we are today? Thank you.

So really, on the gross margin level, volume has certain contributions, but not as much as on the operating level, since most of the expenses are direct expenses. Absolutely, the fact that we can organize ourselves ahead of time is a big contribution to the overall efficiency. How much is that exactly translates into improvement in gross margin? It’s a little bit early to say, but it should help smooth out the operation with hiring people with processes. But again, it’s a bit early to say how much of that will contribute to the gross margin.

Okay, got it. Thanks, team. Appreciate the help.

Thank you.

Thanks. As a reminder, if you have a question, please raise your hand on the platform. Our next question is going to be from Vivek Arya from BofA. Vivek, please go ahead.

Hi, this is Michael Moni on from Vivek Arya. Thank you for allowing us to ask a few questions. So I think a couple of your HBM customers have provided very strong guidance for volume and sales into 2025, and so does your confidence in hitting that eventual $500 million sales target increase. In other words, do you feel more confidence that you’d be able to hit it maybe earlier than expected, given the increased intensity of orders? And in addition, how much of attaining that target is contingent on a recovery in your more traditional business? Thank you.

Let Ramy – maybe let me, I will start and you can complete it. Okay. I would say, the growth rate depends on two major issues. Number one is the market. And some customers may have great demand, but they don’t have enough facility. It takes time to build facilities. So even if they want, they cannot build everything they want. So it’s not everything depends on us. We can provide systems, but sometimes the facility is not ready for installation and running production. There are too many elements that affect the overall requirement. From our side, we feel very comfortable with our ability to build machines, to deliver machines, and to keep our competitiveness because customers ask for more features, for more special requirements and we feel very comfortable, definitely after we complete a lot of R&D efforts to meet the future demand. So everything depends on us. We believe we did everything to maintain our market and potential growth. Now we have to go to the market. We have to be sure that customers have enough capacity and their infrastructure, they can expand it and have enough room to put the production line and to meet the market demand. The market demand is there. We are ready. The next question is if all our direct customers can do it, can really make their facility ready for the demands.

Understood. Thank you. And maybe one on your next, your upcoming platform. So nice to hear this additional color on this next-generation system. Do you have any updates on when we’d expect this to be released on the market? Is this more geared towards hybrid bonding as an application? And what kind of uplift from ASP do you expect?

Ramy, do you want to give some information?

Let me start. So first of all, I think that at this stage it’s too early to provide more information. It’s definitely we will provide, I would say we will start to provide more information to the public in the next few months. It’s not something that will take tomorrow and we’re not at this stage really ready to say more information. What I can say definitely is that there will be an ASP improvement on these new products.

Now, as we said, for example, just to be clear about it, that we could see some of them. For example, as I mentioned in my script, that customer move from about, let’s say, 100 million bumps per wafer to 500 million bumps per wafer. It’s a lot. It’s totally five times more. And we have to – we need to develop solutions now. It’s not enough to inspect it in the fine pitch. Also, customers look on the efficiency on the economic. You want to be sure that it can meet its cost. So altogether is a lot of parameters that allow customers to maintain its cost structure and to make – to get a good result. Some of that is still in the beginning. Not all of them are already in high volume. They finish the R&D. They start moving from R&D to production and we will see it. I believe in the next year we can see more and more very tough, I would say the application moving to high volume.

Thank you very much.

Thanks a lot. Our next question will be from Vedvati Shrotre from Evercore. Vedvati, please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. The first one I wanted to understand was the remaining pieces of your business. You talked about strength in the traditional markets like the compound semi CIS front end. Could you give us a sense of how the revenue splits out between the three and the specific area where you’re seeing more strength versus 90 days ago?

So I think in general we’re seeing improvements, I would say mainly in the front end and the compound semi. Definitely these, we see some improvements as we speak. On the CMOS image sensors, we’re getting indications for improvement. I would say, late this year, beginning of next year. The overall business of what we call the non-HPC business, definitely the OSAT business is already stronger this quarter than it was in the previous one. We’re expecting these businesses to start to grow in the coming quarters. So definitely that’s a very important part of the business. And I'm confident at this stage now, from the numbers that I'm seeing that we will continue to see these improvements in the next few quarters.

And would you provide a split of how the revenue splits between the three? Is that something you can provide?

I can say that what I can tell you that this quarter, for example, the compound in the front, they're, well, about 15%. It's a little lower. I mean, I would have expected in a better quarter to be closer to 20%, maybe even higher. The CMOS Image Sensor is really very low at this stage. It's ones and twos. Definitely this is something that should be in the range of about 5% when we take about the overall business. So these are the numbers and we'll see. I think they will improve as we move along.

Thank you. That's very helpful. And then the next question I had was on your next-generation systems that you talked about, is this, I understand that this is to address applications like the number of bumps increasing, but are you also kind of penetrating into the inspection steps? And another question I had here was how does the qualification process work? Like you have the products kind of shipping in, I think a little bit into your customers. But how much time does it take to really qualify this into the fab lines?

So that's a good question Vedvati. Yes. So first of all, we've already started with the process of qualification, as we said in our prepared remarks. This differs, I mean in a lot of our customers that know us and look at the qualification and the, I would say, testing that we have done here at Camtek and would accept it as part of the evaluation process. They might ask us to run some wafers and we would do it for them and they would buy the equipment. In other customers, it would take very few months of running the machines, but overall it depends on the application. In a lot of the cases, the, I would say that the evaluation, it's maximum in weeks or very few months to cases they will accept our equipment based on the results and the testing that we've done internally.

Got it. And is this addressing the newer generations? Are they addressing more inspection step now versus your Eagle platform? What would you say is the biggest differentiator?

So first of all, a lot of it is inspection. But a lot of our business today is inspection. Even when we talk about Advanced Packaging, HBM, the chiplets, a lot of this is doing also inspection stages. This is metrology and inspection. I would say in general our inspection business is much larger than our metrology business. I think one of the advantages that we bring on our machine is that it would do metrology and inspection. No doubt our inspection today is state-of-the-art. We expect to continue and increase. This is a large market, there are a lot of market shares that we can run after and we definitely expect that with the newer machines we'll increase our market share in the inspection even further.

Got it. That's helpful. And I'll just squeeze in one last one. So can you talk about how – what you're seeing in the China markets and how that has done in the first half of 2024? I know you don't break it out on a quarterly basis, but any color there would be helpful given the trade concerns that have been coming on.

So, I would say that things have not really drastically changed with China. The government there is backing this industry. This is a strategic move for China, and we definitely see more and more investments there all around in the trailing-edge fabs. This is where we are playing in the front-end, and we're seeing a lot of also business expansion, including Advanced Packaging. So we do not see a weakness in China. We see stability and continued investment and we expect to see this business continuing to grow.

I see. Could you give a sense of how that China splits out Advanced Packaging versus trailing-edge fabs, if you could provide any color, is one bigger than the other? That would be helpful.

I think for us in general, we've been in our business primarily has been in the trailing-edge. It's mixed signal, automotive applications and this has been our main market, our target market. In general, we've not been running after, I would say the leading-edge nodes in China and this has not been our target market.

Thanks, Vedvati. Our next question is from Tom O'Malley of Barclays. Tom, please go ahead.

Hi all, this is Will Levy on for Tom O'Malley. Thank you so much for taking my question. Just had a question on the FRT acquisition. How is it trending since you acquired it? And are the upsides you guys are seeing in Advanced Packaging? Any of this attributed to FRT at all?

All in all, I can say, and Rafi, I will start and maybe you can. So all in all, we are very happy with the acquisition and obviously there is an effort to integrate FRT into Camtek and this is underway. From the business side, we're definitely seeing opportunities. The upside is not coming from FRT. FRT is still, as we said, it's a relatively small business this year, we said we gave a target of roughly $30 million. We will meet this target. So definitely it's not yet in the big numbers. We see opportunities. We are talking with customers. I think that in general, customers are very excited about the fact that we acquired FRT. They are very happy. I believe that we will get significant numbers, significant business as we move forward and continue to integrate FRT. We'll get a lot of opportunities there. Opportunities that will enlarge the FRT business and also create new opportunities for us. To summarize, definitely we are on track with the FRT acquisition and our thought process that it will complement our business and we will be able to sell these products through our sales force is indeed correct.

Got it. Thank you.

Thanks. Our next question is from Gus Richard from Northland. Gus, you may go ahead and ask a question. Gus, you're still on mute.

Apologies. Thanks for letting me ask a few questions. In terms of HBM going from HBM 3 to HBM 4, does your inspection intensity increase, and do you have a sense of by how much?

Gus, I think it's a little bit too early at this stage to really pinpoint the steps that we will do on the HBM 4. It's also based on the final, I would say, configuration or the technologies and processes that our customers will use. But definitely a lot of our business in general in HBM are coming from inspection. Yes, that's an area that will probably intensify as these technologies move to hybrid bonding.

Got it. And then in terms of hybrid bonding, just clearly your intensity goes up both for chiplets and CPUs and SRAM.

Definitely.

Got it. And then of your Advanced Packaging, how much these days is fan-out?

Well, it's hard. In general, if we talked about close to 70%, about 20% is 15% to 20% is our traditional, what we call OSAT, about 15%. The rest of our other customers doing what we call wafer-level packaging. Fan-out is a big number out of it. I don’t have the number exactly in front of me, but definitely fan-out is a market that is growing. There are many opportunities there and we have developed some new steps to address some of the challenges there. It's going to be a number that, in the range of 10% plus and in how far a business.

Got it. And this is a difficult question. Having forbid things tensions escalate in the Middle East. But I'm just wondering how you guys are thinking about contingency plans. Is it impacting your business? And if it does get significantly worse, how do you manage through it?

So, first of all, the team here in Israel is prepared for several scenarios and we expect to be able to meet our commitments. This means including deliveries, customer support, and development. I think we went through it and this is the situation. Obviously, longer term, we are also thinking about production out of Israel. We are planning to add manufacturing capacity in Europe at our new FRT facility in Cologne, Germany. So we have a plan in the short term to overcome anything that may happen in the short term. Longer term, we also have a plan.

Obviously we can't really be prepared for all possible scenarios, but we definitely made some efforts to be prepared for whatever we could prepare.

Got it. I apologize for having to ask that question. And then in terms of your planning for capacity for next year and the year out, how close are you getting to be filled out? Is the expansion in Germany part of the ability to deliver more product? And is there a significant investment required?

So no. So from the overall investment. First of all, our manufacturing, the basic manufacturing is done by two very big subcontractors, which are international companies, Jabil and Flex. From that point of view, we have enough capacity. Here in the facility in Israel, we have enough capacity for over $600 million of manufacturing. As I said, we will add additional capacity in Europe. So I think from the overall capacity for any scenarios of upside, we have enough capacity. This includes also from a material point of view, that we can ramp up a clean room space, people. So I think we're very well covered from this point of view.

Thank you. Thank you for allowing me to ask some questions.

Thank you, Gus.

Thanks, Gus. Our next question is from Ezra Weener of Jefferies. Ezra, please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I guess two here. The first is just in terms of new orders, obviously talked about second half and into next year. Can you give a little more detail on the split? And I guess relative to your plan, if any of that was incremental? Then the second would be you've talked about your long-term model and gross margins getting to about 52% at $500 million. Looks like you're getting pretty close to passing that next year. Can you just talk about what leverage would look like from there?

Yes. So with respect to your first question, what portion of this additional business is above our previous expectations? Well, when we prepare our expectation, we take into account our current backlog on hand, plus some potential upside from business that we are going after. So I think we are very close to what we have expected. Originally, hard to say what part of it is an upside, but we are going to end the year very nicely with a nice Q3 and plus additional, continued growth coming into the fourth quarter as well. Your other question relates to the gross margin. So I think we said in the next few quarters, we will operate at the level of 50.5%, 50% to 51.5%. We definitely have plans to reach 52% with the contribution of our new products that we are going to launch in the coming weeks or coming months, they will definitely have a positive contribution to the gross margin. So overall, we are not going to change our expectation that when we reach the $500 plus million revenue level, we should be able to operate on a higher gross margin, close to the or around the 52% that we've mentioned.

Got it. Then one quick follow-up. You discussed Advanced Packaging at 70%. Just want to clarify that 70s, not 70%. Just trying to put all the pieces together. And at 70%, you would be down quarter-over-quarter there. If it is 70%, not 70s. Can you kind of give a little bit more detail on why that is?

It's around 77.0%. And the overall, yes, indeed, it's a little bit lower. This is the result of the other businesses that are growing. We were, as we said, the HPC was over 50%. Definitely these numbers also vary from quarter-to-quarter. It's related to shipments and when customers are planning their clean room. So I wouldn't pay too much attention here to the changes between quarter-to-quarter. I think the business in general, as we said, the HPC is indeed stable and we expect to finish the year anywhere between 50% to 60%. The other businesses, the wafer-level packaging, the front end compound, CMOS Image Sensors, MEMs, and a lot of other applications that we're doing will continue to grow in the third and fourth quarters and definitely in 2025. This mix is something changes, but the big numbers will not change.

Got it. Thank you very much.

So that will end our question-and-answer session. Before I hand back to Rafi, I would like to let everyone know that in the coming hours we will upload the recording of the conference call, the investor relations section of Camtek’s website at camtek.com. I would like to thank all of you for joining this call. And Rafi, please make your closing statement.

I would like to thank you all for your continued interest in our business. I want to especially thank the employees and my management team for their tremendous performance. To our investors, I thank you for your long-term support. I look forward to looking with you again next quarter. Thank you and goodbye.