Welcome to the DexCom Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Release Conference Call. My name is Darren, and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we’ll conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Sean Christensen. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and welcome to DexCom’s second quarter 2021 earnings call. Our agenda this afternoon includes comments on the company's recent performance and strategic initiatives from Kevin Sayer, DexCom’s Chairman, President and CEO; Jereme Sylvain, our Chief Financial Officer; and finally an update from Quen Blackford, our Chief Operating Officer. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the call up for your questions. At that time, we ask analysts to limit themselves to one question, so we can provide an opportunity for everyone participating today. Please note that there are also slides available related to our second quarter performance on the DexCom Investor Relations website on the Events and Presentations page. With that, let’s review our Safe Harbor statement. Some of the statements we will make in today’s call may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s intentions, beliefs, and expectations about future events, strategies, competition, products, operating plans, and performance. All forward-looking statements included in this presentation are made as of the date hereof based on information currently available to DexCom, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any of these forward-looking statements are detailed in DexCom’s annual report on Form 10-K, most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements after the date of this presentation or to conform these forward-looking statements to actual results. Additionally, during the call, we will discuss certain financial measures that have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP with respect to our non-GAAP and cash-based results. Unless otherwise noted, all references to financial metrics are presented on a non-GAAP basis. The presentation of this additional information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results or superior to results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to the tables in our earnings release and the slides accompanying our second quarter earnings presentation for a reconciliation of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Now, I will turn it over to Kevin.

Thank you, Sean, and thank you, everyone, for joining us. Today we reported great results for our second quarter with 32% revenue growth for the quarter compared to the second quarter of 2020, as well as solid execution on our key strategic initiatives that we will discuss throughout the call today. The $143 million in absolute revenue growth compared to the second quarter in 2020 represents the highest quarterly increase in DexCom's history. We continue to believe that we are early in our story with the potential to drive a far greater impact on global health. Our growth performance is closely related to the progress we’ve made to advance access to our CGM systems for people with diabetes. And because there is often so much misinformation spread about access to DexCom's CGM in the field or the cost of our products for people with diabetes, let me point out several key points that our investors, clinicians, and current and potential customers should know. We’ve advanced pharmacy access in the U.S. where more than 70% of our commercial customers have a monthly out-of-pocket cost of less than $60 per month and nearly one-third of our customers have zero out-of-pocket costs for the G6 Sensors. According to IQVIA, this is less than a comparable out-of-pocket cost for our nearest competitor. The latest research from diabetes market research firm Infomed confirms our conclusion. With DexCom having the lowest customer copays of the three largest CGM suppliers in the U.S. for customers on intensive insulin therapy. We've significantly expanded coverage for people with intensively managed type 2 diabetes, with the overwhelming majority of these patients now having coverage for DexCom CGM in the U.S. We also continue to advocate for equitable access to our CGM supplies for populations that are often underserved. As of July 2021, there are now 43 state Medicaid programs providing coverage for DexCom CGM, including a growing number of states providing access to the pharmacy channel for both type 1 and type 2 intensive users. We are building even more on those advocacy efforts in collaboration with several key nonprofit organizations that support the diabetes community. In June, we launched the global movement for time and range to broaden awareness of time and range and its benefits for people with diabetes and their healthcare providers. And we hope that this collaboration effort will lead to future solutions for improved CGM access. Our teams have taken a leading role to drive the removal of administrative barriers that prevent people with diabetes from accessing the benefits of real-time CGM. Along these lines, we are pleased to see the update from CMS in the second quarter to remove the requirement of at least four daily fingersticks for Medicare customers. This will simplify the CGM onboarding process for both customers and clinicians. We've also made solid progress internationally, building from our position of operational strength to advocate for broader reimbursement for G6. This initiative is moving forward according to plan with several geographies publicly announcing enhancements to their coverage of DexCom CGM in the second quarter. Despite these developments, a majority of people on mealtime insulin continue to manage their diabetes with fingersticks. Even in the U.S., a leader in CGM adoption, we continue to believe that the type 1 market remains less than 50% penetrated and the type 2 intensive market is less than 25% penetrated. So there remains a great opportunity ahead of us even in the markets that we currently serve. At the same time, we are generating a growing evidence base for the use of DexCom CGM. At the ATTD and ADA industry conferences in June, we presented exciting research affirming the benefits of our product platform, including the ALERTT1 trial. This randomized controlled trial was simultaneously published in The Lancet, showing superior health outcomes associated with the use of DexCom CGM relative to our nearest competitors' glucose monitor. These conferences also featured several presentations on the use of CGM for people with type 2 diabetes, including those not using mealtime insulin, as well as use in women who are pregnant, use in the hospital setting, and even conclusions applicable to health and wellness using CGM data. Perhaps the most significant of these presentations was the long-awaited readout of our MOBILE trial, which was also published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. MOBILE was another rigorous randomized controlled trial assessing the value of DexCom CGM compared to the current standard of care, fingersticks, for people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. Importantly, the study looked at a diverse user base representative of the U.S. population, and it assessed these people in the primary care clinical environments where they're traditionally served. So what did we see? We saw clinically significant A1c reductions for users of our DexCom CGM systems. And perhaps even more telling, we saw a 16% time and range increase for the CGM cohort, which is four additional hours per day spent in the target glucose range. These were results produced with DexCom CGM and DexCom Software. We designed the trial with the goal of changing the standard of care for these basal insulin users, a group that we believe includes between 3 million and 4 million people in the U.S. alone. With these results, we feel that MOBILE has the potential to do just that. And our team looks forward to driving better awareness and access based on the study outcomes and the JAMA publication. We also made great progress in the second quarter to advance the clinical and regulatory pathway for our next generation G7 CGM system. At ATTD in June, we provided an update on the performance of G7 drawn from our recent clinical trials. Based on the data shown, we expect the G7 will continue the excellent clinical and real-world performance and reliability that we have established with our G6 brand. And we will do so with several factors that we believe will enhance our customer experience, including a fully disposable sensor and transmitter, a redesigned app experience, and a market-leading 30-minute warm-up period. Our G7 continues to progress according to our plans. During the second quarter, we concluded our U.S. clinical trial that will support our ICJM filing; our teams have now shifted to processing the data and working toward preparing the regulatory filing. In addition, we've recently submitted G7 for CE Mark approval. As we previously discussed, we believe that this timing places us still on track to begin the G7 launch by the end of 2021. These are incredible achievements and advances from the quarter, and I step forward to fulfill the promise presented by our CGM technology. And this is just the beginning. There are several additional areas of progress that Jereme and Quen will discuss based on the great work of our teams in the past several months. So with that said, let me turn it over to Jereme for a review of our second quarter financial performance.

Thank you, Kevin. As a reminder, unless otherwise noted, the financial metrics presented today will be discussed on a non-GAAP basis. Reconciliations to GAAP can be found in today's earnings release as well as on our IR website. For the second quarter of 2021, we reported worldwide revenue of $595 million, compared to $452 million for the second quarter of 2020, representing growth of 32% on a reported basis, and 30% on a constant currency basis. As Kevin noted, this represents a record for absolute dollar growth in a quarter year-over-year. U.S. revenue totaled $462 million in the second quarter, compared to $367 million in the second quarter of 2020, representing growth of 26%. Our momentum and market leadership position in the U.S. remains strong, and we have been very encouraged with the continued interest in CGM in the marketplace. With the combination of greater depth in our sales force, solid results from our direct-to-consumer marketing campaigns, and expanded ability to allow for patients and clinicians to trial the G6 experience, we are beginning to see preliminary results in our effort to further expand our presence into primary care offices and position the company to extend our customer base. International business grew about 58% in the second quarter, totaling $134 million. While the second quarter comparisons benefited from the impact of COVID on our second quarter 2020 results, we saw good sequential growth momentum as the business once again achieved a new high watermark. The international growth was broad-based across all markets, including core markets like Germany, the U.K., Canada, Australia, and the Nordic Region. Our shift to the pharmacy channel and sales initiatives in the U.S. and our market expansion initiatives internationally are all progressing according to plan, driving high volume growth in both regions. Volume growth for the second quarter came in around the mid 40% range on a global basis. Perhaps the greatest examples of the international effort during the quarter came from Canada, where we saw public announcements of provincial coverage for G6 from two of the largest Canadian provinces. Quebec, where coverage of G6 was established for people with type 1 diabetes, and British Columbia, which became the first Canadian province to cover G6 for people with type 1 diabetes and intentionally managed type 2 diabetes. These public announcements are representative of our broader strategy to advance access to our technology for people with diabetes. We are leveraging the increasing strength of our operations in driving a meaningful expansion to the total number of patients that we can address via reimbursed pathways. Our second quarter gross profit was $417.1 million or 70.1% of revenue, compared to 64.1% of revenue in the second quarter of 2020. We're very proud of the effort that's gone into these results. The 600 basis points of gross margin expansion is another great validation of the growing efficiencies that we've achieved through product design and efficient manufacturing operations. It is these types of efforts that drive the strategic flexibility to expand our addressable market that I just referenced. Operating expenses were $315.6 for Q2 2021, compared to $213 million for Q2 2020. These results reflect what we previously noted in our discussion of our 2021 plans. We have several areas of investment that we are pursuing, which account for the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of sales relative to the second quarter of 2020. These include the costs associated with our expanded field sales force, the pivotal trial in support of our U.S. G7 regulatory submission, the G7 manufacturing scale-up, and global direct-to-consumer marketing. Our strategic investments have also included our efforts to efficiently scale and lower the cost to serve our customers. As we envision a future in which we serve meaningfully more people than we do today. Our global business services operations in Lithuania and the Philippines are key examples of those initiatives that are driving great customer service while leveraging our G&A spend. Operating income was $101.5 million or 17.1% of revenue in the second quarter of 2021, compared to $76.7 million or 17% of revenue in the same quarter of 2020. The 10 basis point year-over-year improvement was driven by strong improvements to our gross margin resulting from the design of our products and the manufacturing efficiencies that come there through. These improvements more than offset the strategic investment that we've made during the year. Adjusted EBITDA was $156.6 million or 26.3% of revenue for the second quarter, compared to $122.6 million or 27.1% of revenue for the second quarter of 2020. Net income for the second quarter was $75.4 million or $0.76 per share. We remain in a great financial position, closing the second quarter with approximately $2.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents and great financial flexibility to drive our strategic initiatives. Turning to guidance. We continue to expect solid volume growth across all of our regions in the back half of the year with momentum driven by growing CGM awareness globally. Based on our second quarter performance, we are pleased to be in a position to once again raise our full-year 2021 revenue guidance. We now expect 2021 revenue to be between $2.35 billion to $2.4 billion, representing growth of 22% to 25% over 2020. This increase comes on top of our expectations for approximately $10 million of unfavorable currency impact in the back half relative to prior guidance. This revenue increase is primarily a reflection of our continued growth momentum as well as the ongoing impact of our channel mix and international access expansion strategies. We will see a greater revenue per patient impact to our existing base from our international access initiatives in the second half of the year. But we continue to expect the incremental volume driven by these efforts to offset those pressures in our base this year alone. More importantly, this will leave us in a much better position in the years to come. Turning to margins. We're increasing our full-year 2021 targets. This includes non-GAAP results to be approximately at the following levels: gross profit margins of approximately 67%; operating margins of approximately 14%; and adjusted EBITDA margins of approximately 24%. With that, I will now turn the call over to Quen for a scale and strategy update.

Thank you, Jereme. As Kevin and Jereme indicated, we made great progress on our key strategic initiatives during the second quarter. It is hard not to be excited about the market potential for CGM after seeing the depth of research using DexCom technology at the recent ATTD and ADA industry conferences. We saw well over a dozen presentations from DexCom's insulin delivery partners, highlighting the clinical utility of DexCom integrated systems and DexCom's leadership in the field of interoperable solutions. Outside of the mobile and alert publications that Kevin mentioned, we also saw several presentations from our DexCom team members, as well as independent investigators with outcomes that are very promising for the continued growth of DexCom CGM. In one study presented by our health economics team, we looked at real-world evidence documenting the cost savings for a significant number of patients with type 2 diabetes using G6, including both the intensive insulin therapy and those who are not treated with mealtime insulin. The results were compelling, with the magnitude of cost savings generated for G6 users being nearly identical to the cost savings we've seen in several of our other pilots. This is yet another data point supporting economic benefits associated with the better glucose control for our customers. And we are excited to leverage this growing evidence base into broader access for people with diabetes around the world. We also continue to innovate our software solutions to enable differentiated user experiences that meet the needs of the diverse customer bases that we serve. Most recently, in mid-July, we received FDA clearance on a real-time API software solution. This is to our knowledge, one of the first, if not the first, real-time API clearance in the medical device sector that enables integration with third-party apps. As many of you likely know, prior to the clearance of our real-time API, our various digital health partners were limited to the display of CGM data on a three-hour delayed basis through our retrospective API. With this new API, partners who are now invited by DexCom have the ability to integrate real-time DexCom CGM data into their respective apps and devices. This is another great win for our customers, who will now benefit from the ability to see real-time glucose levels in a variety of new displays, according to their needs. At the time of the approval, we announced Garmin and Teladoc's Livongo for diabetes program as early users of the new API solution. In addition, Welldoc and UnitedHealthcare's Level 2 are utilizing our real-time connectivity solutions in their integrated offerings. This is an exciting innovation for us and an example of how we are leveraging our leadership and software connectivity to advance our market position in the growing digital health landscape. On the commercial front, we remain well-positioned to drive growth and broader DexCom market penetration in several locations. In addition to the significant access expansion efforts that we began to implement last quarter to enable multiples of growth in our core markets, we are growing our presence in locations that are relatively new to our team. This includes Japan, where we've recently sent our first shipment of G6 systems to a local distributor. Although we have had a minor presence in Japan through the use of our key for professional CGM, these G6 systems represent the expanded use of our product to serve people with diabetes with our core ambulatory solution. We're incredibly excited to bring our CGM technology to empower people with diabetes in Japan and look forward to developing that as a nice growth market for DexCom. In addition to the strong G7 performance data shown at ATTD, in the clinical and regulatory updates that Kevin provided, our operations team is continuing according to plan in our G7 manufacturing development and scaling efforts. We have automated lines producing G7 products as we speak, with a steady cadence of additional lines scheduled to be delivered to the back half of this year and throughout 2022. In addition, the vendors in our supply chain are scaling up G7 capabilities alongside us as we sit here today. We will take what we have learned from these automated lines in San Diego and Mesa and use them to quickly replicate and scale a new manufacturing facility in Malaysia. As we've said before, this effort will be critical to our ability to serve significant customer populations that we think can benefit from our CGM technology, giving us a clear runway to produce more than 200 million sensors per year, and a much stronger presence in a key growth region for us. Our team is doing a great job to advance our efforts in what continues to be a challenging environment to navigate because of the impact of the pandemic globally. We are currently building out the manufacturing facility while also scaling our supply chain, putting us on track to be ready for production in 2022. As you can see from our 70% gross margin this quarter, as we make this progress on G7, we are also advancing our efforts towards operational excellence, resulting in even greater improvements and efficiencies to our G6 manufacturing, procurement, and distribution capabilities. Overall, as I think Kevin and Jereme would agree, we are very proud of the work of our teams to execute on the ambitious plans that we set forth in 2021. With that, I will pass the call back to Kevin.

Thanks, Quen. I agree with that message as we are all very pleased with the progress that we made during the quarter. To be able to raise guidance across the board, including another revenue raise of $65 million added to the midpoint of guidance is a great result for the company. We're excited to continue that momentum into the second half of the year. I would now like to open up the call for Q&A.

Thank you, Kevin. As a reminder, we ask our audience to limit themselves to only one question at this time, and then reenter the queue if necessary. Operator, please provide the Q&A instructions.

And our first question comes from Robbie Marcus. Robbie, go ahead.

Oh, great. I want to congratulate you guys on a really nice quarter. If I can ask, I think we're all interested in updated G7 approval timing. It sounds like you haven't filed in the U.S. yet. And you had a great international number. I'd love if you could provide, just any examples or tangible examples of how the expansion of benefit is already helping you and how it might continue to help you the rest of this year and next year. Thanks.

Well, I'll start with G7. Then I'll let Quen and Jereme take over the benefit expansion. I mean, with respect to G7, we're very deliberate about what we disclose. We have filed for CE Mark and we are on schedule for that; we hit our goal there. And we are now gathering the data from the U.S. pivotal study. It was a much larger study than the data that was presented at ATTD. However, the trial was run under actually what we think are improved protocols from what we ran before. So we have no reason to not expect great data. We believe the product will be very robust. We will make sure that we deliver that file in a very pristine manner. We hear a lot of things about FDA delays and things of that nature. We don’t want to create delays. It's been our experience over time, and if we deliver what the FDA expects, they move very quickly and they’re very cooperative with us. We have no reason to believe the file we're preparing isn't going to meet those expectations or moving along those lines. So again, with the CE Mark filing, we're on track for an OUS launch later this year. And we'll update you more on the U.S. as time goes on.

When?

Yes, Robbie, with respect to your question or comments on the OUS business. Look, there was strength really across the board in that entire portfolio of ours. So we're very encouraged by what we're seeing there, primarily on the heels of awareness just continuing to grow. To be honest with you, I don't think we've seen the benefit yet of the increased access that we spoke about really back in the first quarter, and the team has made incredible progress in working with the payers and negotiating these contracts. I'd say we are through 90% or so of those, all landing in favorable positions where we've probably increased or improved access for nearly a million patients in the first half of the year alone, in the OUS business. But the reality is that benefit's not going to show up until the back half of the year. So the strength in the second quarter, I wouldn't attribute that to the increased access just yet. But we're very excited about how we're positioned as we go into the back half of the year around those access efforts.

Great. Appreciate the thought.

And our next question comes from Bob Hopkins. Bob, go ahead.

Thank you. I want to touch on two quick points. First, Clint, I think you're referring to the access fees, and I would like to know more about the price cuts and the negotiations around them. How do you feel that process is progressing? I apologize if this overlaps with your last question. Kevin, could you also provide a brief update? Some time has passed since the MOBILE trial, and I am curious about any feedback you’re receiving from insurance partners or other key stakeholders regarding how this data might affect reimbursement for a wider patient group in the future.

Sure. So I'll jump on that first one, Bob. We are talking the exact same thing there. In terms of the fact that we've negotiated or work through the majority of those negotiations through the course of the second quarter. More than 90% or so of them behind us are all landing in favorable positions relative to improving the access for the patients and reducing the administrative burdens that were there. So very bullish around where we're at and creating incremental access for our patients, and how that sets up into the back half of the year. The pricing assumptions have come right in line with what we expected as we were going into it, no surprises there. So from our perspective, all positive on that front.

And, Bob, with respect to the MOBILE study, obviously, we're very excited about it. Just a little time has passed here. We also have a bunch of other analyses on this data that are coming that will support our position on basal insulin reimbursement for these patients. It's time to get the word out. Now, I think one of the big areas here is going to be CMS discussions down the line because a lot of these patients fall into the Medicare bucket. We haven't done any of that yet, but we are looking forward and we're preparing because this day yet, it's just but we are looking forward. Thank you.

And our next question comes from Jeff Johnson. Go ahead, Jeff.

Yes, thanks. Good Afternoon, guys. Yes, just saying on maybe the international side for a second, Jeremy, last quarter, you talked about a $15 million incremental headwind from Quentin's comments. It sounds like maybe those really haven't started to flow in yet. So do we think about that $50 million headwind kind of next 12-month number? Is that how to think about it? And then those initial $200 million headwinds that we kind of were expecting heading into this year, the first quarter kind of straight lined in right at about $50 did it straight line again in the second quarter about the $50 on the US side, and still thinking about the international than $50 over the next 12 months. Thanks, guys.

Sure. So the full year guidance around pricing or channel mix headwinds is still the same. And so the $200 million on what we call the original shift mix primarily in the U.S., it's still the same in the second quarter. It came in a little bit lighter than the first quarter but generally in line and so I think we're seeing that stable and we talked about at the beginning you're being pretty stable throughout the course of the year. To your point on the international incremental headwinds about the access for price conversation that has started its back half loaded. We certainly will have some of those in the first half of next year, as we anniversary some of those contracts of the $250 million we talked about was really the impact on 2021. And so you'll see the $50 million in the back half of the year; there will be a little of that into 2022. We'll get more into that in the future. But that will happen over a 12-month period.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Matthew O'Brian. Go ahead, Matthew.

Afternoon, thanks for taking the question. I know traditionally DexCom has been pretty conservative with their outlook. But I think Jeremy just said the pricing concessions are going to be impactful in the back half. But as I look at the model, the back half of the year has easier comps than the first half, and you just put up a monster Q2, especially in the U.S. So is there something specifically you're trying to call out as far as incremental pressure in the back half of the year that we should be aware of? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks for the question. Certainly nothing that we're trying to call out. I think when we thought about guidance, we certainly talked about the performance in the first half of the year. And certainly thinking about that patient base and how that plays out for the balance of the year. So that's contemplated in the guidance. And look, we raised the guidance $65 million at the midpoint and $75 million when you exclude the impact of currency. So we've certainly raised it and passed through some of that for the balance of the year. As we think about the back half of the year, we simply don't want to get ahead of ourselves. We talked about the impact, and you pointed out the international access, but there still is COVID out there and the Delta variant is out there. And so rather than increase it and get bullish and get ahead of ourselves, we want to see how it plays through for the balance of the year. We do hear and this is out there outside the U.S. where primary care physicians are taking their practice, and ultimately using their time to administer vaccinations. While we've done a great job navigating through those thus far this year. We do want to be prudent and make sure that we are contemplating and look if we can deliver more than that, we certainly will and will talk to it if we are able to.

Thank you.

And our next question comes from Matthew Blackman. Go ahead, Matthew.

Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. Jereme, I just was curious about the second half cadence and whether we should be thinking about sort of a typical third quarter or fourth quarter cadence? Or are we sort of at the point or approaching the point where things like increasing pharmacy access may make the year somewhat less Q weighted than we've seen historically? Any help on that would be appreciated. Thanks.

Yes, I'm happy to address that. When considering Q3, it is typically not significantly affected by changing trends. Over the past few years, Q3 has consistently represented about 26% of our full-year revenue, and we anticipate a similar pattern this year. This perspective should help you understand Q3 and how it relates to the rest of the year. In Q4, we expect a lower revenue contribution, especially following the changes from Q1 due to the transition to the pharmacy, which makes this period less seasonal. We anticipate that Q4 will also reflect this trend, with fewer customers in the DME channel rushing to utilize their benefits. As we've previously mentioned, our shift towards the pharmacy is leading to a reduction in Q4 weighting and more uniform distribution across the quarters, moving away from traditional seasonality. I hope this provides some clarity. For Q3 specifically, we expect it to align with previous periods, maintaining that 26% seasonality.

And our next question comes from Matt Taylor. Go ahead, Matt.

Thank you. So I wanted to ask one on the margins here. I guess the way I'll ask it is you showed significant progress. Quentin, you talked about a lot of the scaling and automation activities you're doing in these facilities. Has the results that you've had so far and being able to raise guidance changed your view on the longer-term potential for margins at all to the positive versus the LRP?

Yes, what I would say is, look, our confidence level continues to increase in our ability to keep it in that mid 60s range that we've guided to long-term. Is there the opportunity to take it north of there over time? If so, you can bet on it; that we're going to flow that through and give that up if possible. But look, we're in the midst of evaluating many different potential business models. As you look at the whole type 2 non-intensive space as it opens up, we're looking at the international business continuing to expand in a significant way. Pharmacy access continues to grow. All of these things are going to continue to put a bit of pressure on the gross margin profile. But if you saw the way that we were able to take cost out of the product from a design perspective and improve the process efficiencies around manufacturing this, your confidence level only increases in where we can keep that gross margin over time. So we're incredibly excited by what we're seeing, a lot of that doesn't contemplate the fact that over time, you probably see us move into a 15-day wear cycle on the product itself, and so there's significant benefits that come there also. So, again, a bit back to Jereme's point earlier, this is not an area that we're going to get ahead of ourselves. But we feel like we have the flexibility we need to really get after the market opportunities that present themselves and still deliver a very attractive gross margin profile in this business.

Great. Thanks for the comments and congrats on a good result.

Thanks, Matt.

And our next question comes from Margaret Kaczor. Go ahead, Margaret.

Hey, good afternoon, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to follow up a little bit on the real-time APIs you guys got approval for and it seems like to me like it could be one of the next evolutions for the business. So I was curious if you could talk to us about how important it is today versus three years from now. What it can facilitate both clinically and commercially. And I guess just to round it out, what's been the reaction from the potential partners to the API so far?

So maybe I'll start with the reaction. The reaction has been incredibly positive. I think folks understand and desire to see the real-time information coming into their tools and being able to put that into the hands of the patients. The more real-time that information is, the more reactive the patient can be to that information and improve their outcomes over time. And I think, we're incredibly bullish in the sense that we believe we have the capability in a platform to build these tools off of. And that's exactly where we want to be, we want to provide as much input to these tools as we possibly can and work with as many partners as possible. I think from the very beginning, we've always had a bit of a different approach to the value of information, data, and software in particular. And what you're seeing play out right now is part of that vision that we've had there and the approval of the real-time API, we've invested heavily in the ability to produce this capability. We understand the importance of interoperability, the importance of putting information in the hands of the patients. That's who DexCom is. And you're going to continue to see us invest in that area and really use it as a differentiator. In terms of how that evolves into the future and if there is an opportunity to create value in that, monetization of the data stream or the real-time API, those are all things we will evaluate over time. That's not our strategy today. Today, it's all about improving outcomes for patients that's going to show up in the way of incremental sensor sales over time. And we're very happy with that approach. But it leaves us with some great flexibility.

Great, thanks.

And our next question comes from an indiscernible source. Please go ahead.

Congratulations on a good quarter. I know you've talked about the OUS G7 here in the back half. And just curious if you could put some context on expectations for how you think about that launch and which countries, if you’re willing to share that, and you've also got probably 40 to 50 million G6 sensors that you're making a year. And just curious what you're going to do with that G6 capacity as G7 launches?

That's a great question. I'll address that. We won't provide details on specific countries for competitive reasons, as we don't disclose our playbook. However, we are on track. Moving forward, it's an interesting topic for us to discuss. We need to figure out how to utilize our G6 capacity while simultaneously ramping up G7 lines, since the two don't overlap. We believe there will be a demand for G6 for a significant period. Even though we plan to launch globally and swiftly, there will be regions where G7 won't be immediately available. Our partners will take some time to catch up on the automated insulin delivery aspect. We're collaborating with them on G7 while still having G6 available for those areas. Additionally, there are some regions where we haven't started yet, and we can offer G6 in those locations while launching G7 elsewhere. We are carefully planning this and it's a topic of significant discussion for us. We'll manage the transition as effectively as possible and won't hesitate to reduce G6 production if G7 proves to be as successful as we anticipate. Quentin, along with his operations team and our R&D team, has developed impressive manufacturing processes for G7 that provide us with great flexibility to scale up quickly and thoughtfully. We'll keep a close eye on this matter. It's a pertinent question and one we consider frequently.

And our next question comes from Danielle Antalffy. Go ahead, Danielle.

Hey, good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. I'm not sure who this question is for, but it's on the DTC initiatives. You guys had a very successful Super Bowl ad campaign. Just curious if there's any way to quantify what you're seeing from a return perspective yet. I mean, this quarter, what seems exceptionally strong to me, I'm wondering if we're seeing any benefit from that, not sure if you can even tell? Or if you can tell us. But if so, we'd love to hear even qualitative feedback there. Thanks so much.

Sure, we appreciate the question. There are a couple of key data points that can help clarify the feedback we've received. Firstly, Q2 was our best quarter ever for adding new patients, largely attributed to our direct-to-consumer efforts, sales team initiatives, and sampling strategies. Secondly, we have doubled the number of active prescribers of our product over the past 18 months. Engaging with both endocrinologists and primary care physicians has significantly increased awareness and prescribing rates of our product. These two indicators clearly demonstrate the positive impact of our investments in awareness, direct-to-consumer marketing, and our sales force. I hope this provides some insight, and looking at the revenue performance for the quarter also offers additional context. Overall, these data points suggest that we still see this as a remarkable investment with strong returns compared to the industry.

And our next question comes from Jayson Bedford. Go ahead, Jayson.

Thanks. Just a quick one. I wanted to get back to the gross margin line of questioning. What weighs on gross margin in the second half of the year to get to 67 for the year? Is it international pricing? Is the buildup of Malaysia? And just if you can comment on, it seems like a large portion of these costs may be transitory. Any color there would be helpful.

Sure. The two main factors affecting this are the international pricing and the launch of G7. As you noted, the international pricing will put some pressure on our margins. Regarding G7, initially, those production lines won't operate at full capacity or yield, similar to what we experienced with G6 when we introduced new automation. Although we anticipate strong output right from the start, the costs associated with this will be higher. You are observing some impact from international access, and as we roll out G7, the brief period of higher production costs will be evident. In response to your question about whether this impact is temporary, we believe it will stabilize as our team continues to enhance our manufacturing capabilities at higher capacities and yields. This quarter demonstrates their skill, as shown by our margins, and we foresee a turnaround with G7 in the future. However, there will be a transition period similar to what we encountered with G6. We remain very optimistic about our team's ability and are confident in their performance as we roll out G7.

And our next question comes from Joanne Wuensch. Go ahead, Joanne.

Thank you and nice quarter. Two questions. Was there any stocking in the quarter either in the U.S or the OUS market? And then you gave us sort of a blended volume-price number. Could you sort of parse that out for the U.S and for the International sales dynamic? Thank you.

Yes, there was no stocking in the quarter, everything was at normal levels. Regarding your question about a blended number, I'm not entirely clear on what you mean. We do have a price dynamic of about $250 million, but when we refer to price, it's more about the channel. We want to clarify that it's the shift in channel and international access that matters. We also discussed unit volumes, which I assume you might be referring to; our unit volume growth for the quarter was in the mid 40% range year-over-year, indicating a strong quarter for unit volume growth. I hope this addresses your question. If you have any other inquiries, please feel free to ask for further clarification.

Actually, it's the unit volume number that mid 40% that's what I want to call a blended number. What is that number in the U.S and international?

We don't break it out. That's our global number. But we can tell you that the growth on unit volume was strong in both the U.S and outside the U.S.

Okay, thank you very much.

And our next question comes from Steve Lichtman. Go ahead, Steve.

Thank you. Hi, guys. Kevin, you talked about momentum in intensive type 2. Where do you think U.S penetration into that market can go over the next few years? Or are there any hurdles to drive penetration? Or are you feeling good now where awareness and payer coverage are continuing to drop penetration there?

We feel very good about the coverage we have there. On the commercial side, it's up over 80% of the intensive type 2 patients now covered for commercial payers plus the Medicare coverage. So we have that it covers a number of these patients already. So access for these patients isn't going to be a problem. It's now all about awareness. We went and doubled the size of our sales force at the beginning of this year. So we get access to more primary care physicians who do see a lot of the insulin using type 2 patients. And we've seen great results from that team. We've had a huge increase in the number of prescribers of our product over the course of this year. So that is a big win. For us, it's about getting to him and explain to him what technology is available. We think this market will be every bit as penetrated as type 1 at some point in time. We view it as a very strong opportunity.

Okay. Thanks, Kevin.

Our next question comes from Anthony Petrone. Go ahead, Anthony.

Great. Thanks. Congratulations. Great quarter and hope everyone's doing well on the team. Maybe a quick one on Malaysia and G7. Is it safe to assume G7 will be exclusively manufactured out of there? And if so, what does that mean for the margin of that product? And then maybe a quick update on the integrated device partnerships, Control-IQ, and eventually Omnipod 5, just how you see those partnerships and those product cycles evolving over the next 24 months. Thank you.

Yes, I'll address the question about Malaysia. Kevin will touch on the final part. Regarding Malaysia, G7 will not be exclusive to that location. We will initially begin G7 in the United States, specifically in San Diego and Mesa. In fact, the production lines are already established, and we will continue to ramp up throughout this year and into next year. As Malaysia becomes operational and as we complete the construction of the facility and validate the clean room and its capabilities, we will start to develop G7 there as well. Therefore, G7 will operate in both locations over time. This will enable us to produce over 200 million sensors in total. Considering the distribution of these sensors in the U.S. and internationally, it makes sense to maintain production capabilities in both the States and Malaysia, especially when we factor in the logistics and distribution costs associated with handling the product volumes we anticipate. Both locations will be operational. Over time, I believe the cost advantages will arise from the Malaysia facilities, which is a key part of the value proposition. This will allow us to effectively and efficiently serve many international markets.

Yes, and with respect to the integrated systems, we're very excited for these opportunities. I actually made it out in the field last week. There is a whole bunch of pent-up demand for Omnipod 5. People are very ready for it. They've been ready for it for a long time and we're looking forward to that day as well on the Tandem side. We know they're working on new products and have new projects. I think the best thing I can talk about with Tandem is just a recent story. I got a note on my computer. Somebody wanted to give me a Facebook message and it was person who told me it's been 22 years on Medtronic systems and is now on Tandem Control-IQ with DexCom and he has never been healthier, never had a lower A1c. Never had better, he said my whole life has changed because this system is amazing. So we believe the integrated systems driven by DexCom sensors are game changers. People get accurate sensors, information that can take these sophisticated algorithms and make proper decisions. We're very bullish and optimistic on both these opportunities going forward. Very excited.

The next question comes from Ravi Misra. Go ahead, Ravi.

All right. Thanks for taking the question. Just on the DexCom API, can you talk a little bit about how you chose some of the partners that you're working with? I understand Livongo, of course, but with Garmin and then just more on that. Just walk us through kind of how you envision this being separate or integrated with CLARITY in the future? Just curious why this is for industry rather than kind of providers itself? Thanks.

Yes, this is Kevin, I'll handle the CLARITY piece. With the live API, the patient still has to run the DexCom app in the background. So the data will go straight to CLARITY and it will be there as it is now. The better question is will we ever have a CLARITY type system for those who don't have the same needs as intensive insulin users? And I think over time, you'll see us migrate our tools to that platform. Hence, you heard these guys talk about software investments over the last half of the year. And as we look at 2022, we see the same. We're quickly becoming a software company in addition to a sensor company. It's very exciting there. Quentin, do you want to talk...

Yes, in terms of the partners, I mean, you think about the Teladoc Livongo's diabetes program, the UnitedHealth, the Welldoc and Garmin, these are partners that we've had established relationships with in the past. There is a little bit of integration work that goes into providing the real-time API and the connection into their systems. These were the easy ones out of the gate that really sync up with and get programs going with. But I think the important thing is we want to be a foundation that we can provide this sort of information into many programs out there, and really improve the outcomes for the patients themselves. And I don't think we can be better positioned to be able to do that right now. So incredibly thrilled with where it's at, and expect more partners to be lining up.

And our next question comes from Marie Thibault. Go ahead, Marie.

Thank you. Congrats on a nice quarter and thanks for the time today. Just a quick follow-up, I think on the comments around the sales force. I know that you doubled the sales force this year. So just want to get an update on where they are in their productivity ramp. I know we typically think of at least 6 to 9 months to get to a more normal productivity level. So would love to hear kind of a status update on that. Thank you.

I think you're right on target. It does take about 6 to 9 months for everybody to get up to speed. The one thing we are saying, if I can just give you one trend though, is we try and expand our coverage into the PCP offices where we haven't been before. It's a lot of work. We haven't been there. And as we knock on doors, it's taken these guys a while to get appointments. Once they get in, we're finding the physicians do not know a whole lot about DexCom. And if anything, we've totally validated our assumptions. In this expansion, we had to get out there, we had to get more feet on the street, and more faces to be as competitive as we want it to and to achieve our goals.

And our next question comes from an indiscernible source. Please go ahead.

This is Kyle Rose from Canaccord. You made significant investments on the commercial side this year, including doubling the sales force and conducting trials. I wanted to know if you could identify one of these as a more significant driver than the other, as I'm trying to understand how much we might be seeing in terms of productivity gains from the sales force within the primary care channel.

Yes, I can take that. So, at first, these all really needed to be done in conjunction. But the immediate one that you get returns on is, obviously, awareness. And awareness comes in many forms and factors, but clearly through DTC. I think at this point, they all go hand in hand because you're making folks aware, you're getting out into the physician's office, you're making the physician aware certainly through your rep and through the Hello DexCom program, people are getting the opportunity to trial it. And so we did them all together. So maybe early out of the gate, DTC was the immediate shot in the arm, but at this point, they're all really contributing in conjunction. And so that's the way we think about it. Over the longer haul, you think that feet on the street are going to be incredibly important as these physicians need to have relationships with folks in conjunction with all the other offerings that we provide. We have to validate that over time, Kevin referenced it was we get in front of these doctors, we're educating them, but the way I think about it as DTC was the immediate more quick return. But I think at this point, they're all contributing equally.

And we have no more questions at this time. I'd like to turn it back to Kevin Sayer for closing comments.

Thank you very much. And thank you everybody for participating in and listening to our earnings report today. In summary, this was a quarter of tremendous accomplishment. Just under $600 million in revenue for this quarter with our highest ever absolute revenue and dollar increase when compared to the previous year's quarter. Our worldwide field and access expansion efforts are working exactly the way we planned. Positioning is very well for the rest of 2021 and beyond. 70% gross margins during a period of continued planned annual revenue per patient reductions to increase global access for all diabetes customers, new record operating income during a period of increased investment and what I believe is the most robust product pipeline we've ever had. G7 progress continues. Very important measurable milestones have been achieved on schedule this quarter. And there's nothing like being around here as we approach a deadline. It is just energizing. Other projects here made great progress as well. And finally, we are laying the groundwork for our future growth with irrefutable fact-based clinical evidence. This technology will have a major impact in health care all over the world. Thanks, everybody and have a great day.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.