Thank you for joining us today. On the call are Mike Burkland, Chairman and CEO, Dan Burkland, President, and Barry Zwarenstein, CFO. Certain statements made during the course of this conference call that are not historical facts, including those regarding the future financial performance and cash position of the company, expected improvements in financial-related metrics, expected ARR from certain customers, our proposed acquisition of Acqueon, certain expected revenue mix shifts, customer growth, anticipated customer benefits from our solution, including from AI, the extent of anticipated TAM expansion, our ability to take advantage of such expansion, company growth, enhancements to and development of our solution, market size and trends, our expectations regarding macroeconomic conditions, company market position, initiatives and expectations, technology and product initiatives, including investment in R&D and other future events or results, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are simply predictions and should not be unduly relied upon by investors. Actual events or results may differ materially, and the company undertakes no obligation to update the information in such statements. These statements are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect Five9's future results and cause these forward-looking statements to be inaccurate, including the impact of adverse economic conditions, including macroeconomic deterioration and uncertainty, including continuing increased inflation, increased interest rates, supply chain disruptions, decreased economic output and fluctuations in currency exchange rates, lower growth rates within our installed base of customers and the other risks discussed under the caption Risk Factors and Elsewhere in Five9's annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, management will make reference to non-GAAP financial measures during this call. A discussion of why we use non-GAAP financial measures and information regarding reconciliation of our GAAP versus non-GAAP results and guidance is currently available in our press release issued earlier this afternoon, as well as in the appendix of our investor deck that can be found in the Investor Relations section on Five9's website. Lastly, a reminder that unless otherwise indicated, financial figures discussed are non-GAAP. And now I'd like to turn the call over to Five9's Chairman and CEO, Mike Burkland.

Thanks, everyone, for joining our call this afternoon. I'm pleased to report that we achieved a key milestone in Q2, with an annual revenue run rate exceeding $1 billion, primarily driven by LTM Enterprise subscription revenue growing 21% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased sequentially to 17% of revenue, helping drive strong LTM operating cash flow of $126 million, or 13% of revenue. Before I move on to the business updates, let me comment on our outlook for the remainder of the year. We are reducing our top line annual guidance by 3.8%, based on the latest trends we saw in June bookings and other factors that Barry will elaborate on. In response, we will be laser-focused on managing expenses to generate improved margins and cash flow. As a result, we're raising the midpoint of our annual non-GAAP EPS guidance. This is also consistent with our objective of driving shareholder value through balanced, profitable growth, further supporting our positive long-term outlook. Now, turning to our business updates. Today, I want to focus my comments on some announcements we believe will drive significant future growth for Five9 by improving AI-powered customer experiences. First, I'll comment on our agreement to acquire Acqueon, and then I'll touch on our AI strategy and the latest innovations that are extending our leadership position in AI. I'm excited to announce our agreement to acquire Acqueon, a significant step in extending our AI-powered CX platform and market reach. Today, brands are increasingly wanting to proactively reach customers for sales, e-commerce, collections, and appointment reminders, as well as service and support. Acqueon excels in orchestrating proactive outbound omnichannel customer engagement across numerous CX use cases and has assisted leading financial services, retail, and healthcare businesses to connect with their audiences and increase revenue through higher contact and conversion rates. Like a symphony conductor, Acqueon's platform uses AI and contextual data to predict, personalize, and orchestrate when and how to best reach customers. Adding Acqueon's capabilities to Five9’s intelligent CX platform is a big step toward realizing our ambition to become the orchestration engine for every interaction across the entire customer journey, including marketing, e-commerce, sales, as well as customer service. In addition, the multimodal interactions handled by Acqueon generate incremental contextual data that will further strengthen the value of our AI. Five9 and Acqueon have already been partnering to win some of the largest enterprise CX opportunities in the industry. And we're very bullish on the opportunities we see in the pipeline. We anticipate the Acqueon transaction to close in the second half of 2024. Now, turning to our AI strategy. Since 2018, Five9 has been focused on harnessing the power of AI to elevate CX. Today, consumers will tell you that their interactions with many brands are disjointed and not satisfactory. This is often due to customer interactions being spread across many platforms and touchpoints, each of which is siloed. This has driven our ambition to orchestrate every interaction between a consumer and a brand through Five9's Intelligence CX platform powered by Five9 Genius AI. Our platform provides advanced orchestration for elevated customer experiences, allowing us to bring together all of these interactions and personalize them using contextual data. Our strategy has been consistent throughout, embedding AI across our platform, delivering practical AI solutions that drive tangible business value, and helping our customers leverage AI responsibly. Also, with our engine agnostic approach, we enable our customers to continually take advantage of the rapid innovation in AI. But technology alone is not enough to deliver this vision. And so we combine it with our trusted AI and CX experts to help our customers navigate through this evolving world of AI. And now I'd like to share two significant steps we've taken to extend our leadership position in AI. First, we're excited to announce the general availability of GenAI Studio. This pioneering product serves as a central hub for brands to apply GenAI across all CX touchpoints within the Five9 platform and beyond. We now have the unique ability to break down data silos by leveraging contextual data, not just within our platform, but also from external systems such as CRM, marketing, e-commerce, and more, all through a single pane of glass. This comprehensive 360-degree view of the customer experience enables us to deliver hyper-personalization and improved business outcomes. And second, we're announcing the newest member of the Five9 Genius AI suite, AI Knowledge. AI Knowledge allows brands to provide concise answers to many common questions their customers might have by training custom GenAI models with knowledge unique to their brand. AI Knowledge can be used for voice and chatbots, enabling self-service answers to a much wider set of use cases than were previously possible with prior generation FAQ bots. That in turn reduces the need for calls and chats to reach live agents, saving brands money. AI Knowledge is also integrated into Five9 AI Agent Assist, allowing agents to get quicker and more accurate answers to customer questions. That allows them to offer accurate and faster service, improving CX while also reducing handle times and cutting costs. And best of all, AI Knowledge reduces the amount of time people have to sit waiting on hold, something we can all appreciate. These latest AI innovations are important additions to our market-leading AI portfolio, which today is enabling some of the world's largest brands to elevate their CX. Turning now to our market opportunity related to AI, as we've said in the past, AI represents a TAM expansion for Five9. For instance, if a hypothetical Five9 customer is able to automate 15% of interactions and therefore reduce seats and labor costs by 15%, given that we are providing the software for that automation, our subscription revenue increases on a net basis by 30%. In other words, it's a win-win for both our customers and us. Now let's get a little more specific and take a look at three real-life examples from our customer base. The first is a healthcare company and a long-time Five9 customer with 1,000 agents that is a supplier of medical test kits. As call volumes were increasing, they implemented our IVA and patients were able to automatically schedule a pickup or delivery three times faster without waiting in queue for an agent. In addition, they saw overall agent handle time decline by 10%. Since that IVA implementation, Five9's total subscription revenue from this customer has increased 20%. The second example is a financial institution which was seeing increasing call volumes. Within a month of our IVA implementation, they saw an 8% reduction in agent talk time while increasing customer satisfaction due to faster response times. In this case, Five9's total subscription revenue from this customer increased by 30%. The third example is a Fortune 500 medical device company. Since the deployment of our IVA, overall call duration was reduced by 16%, resulting in cost reductions. Five9's total subscription revenue from this customer increased by 30%. In summary, we remain very optimistic about the long-term opportunities in this massive market that is expanding even further with AI. We believe we are well positioned to further strengthen our leadership position with ongoing innovations to our Five9 Genius AI suite. Our AI solutions are driving significant and tangible business outcomes for our customers to elevate CX. And with that, I will turn it over to our President and CRO, Dan Burkland. Dan, please go ahead.

Thank you, Mike, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, I'd like to start off by discussing our bookings for the second quarter and sharing some key go-to-market initiatives. In Q2, we had a challenging bookings quarter primarily due to customer budgets being more constrained and scrutinized. As a result, we did not have any mega deals, and we had fewer $1 million ARR deals than expected during the quarter. In addition, while we are very proud of our talented sales team, we are taking action to further improve our sales execution and efficiency, including recently promoting an accomplished 10-year Five9 veteran to EVP of sales, giving us a single 100% dedicated sales leader. We're also realigning resources across market segments and partnering more aggressively with certain technology solutions and integrations. And now, I'd like to share some key wins for the quarter. The first example is a new customer who, in March, was preparing to place a significant order with Five9, including the Acqueon solution. You may recall, last quarter, I described a Q1 deal over $3.8 million in ARR for a company that helps universities with recruiting, enrollment, and fundraising. On March 30, we were still completing the SOW details for the Acqueon portion, and the customer agreed to place the orders for the Five9 solutions. Shortly thereafter, we completed the SOW and received an order for an additional $1.3 million of ARR for the Acqueon portion, making that an anticipated $5.2 million ARR customer for Five9. The second example is a healthcare provider with a leading virtual care platform who is looking to improve and elevate experiences with their patients, doctors, nurses, and pharmacies. They've gone all in with Five9, including our chat, email, SMS, AI Agent Assist, Salesforce integration, and the full WEM suite to enable hyper-personalized experiences at every touchpoint. We anticipate this initial order will result in over $1.1 million in ARR for Five9. The third example is also in the healthcare field, a full-service pharmacy benefits management company that had been using another leading CCaaS provider but did not feel they were getting the focus and attention from their provider to help them truly elevate their AI experiences and deliver better business outcomes. With an acceleration of AI and a vast array of solutions, companies are looking for a partner with a team of experts who will listen, analyze, tailor, and apply continuous optimization to meaningfully improve those business outcomes. As a result, they purchased our chat, email, Salesforce integration, our WEM suite powered by Verint, voice stream for caller authentication, and our AI Agent Assist solutions, including transcripts and summaries. We anticipate this initial order will result in over $1.1 million in ARR to Five9. Now I'd like to share two examples of existing customers who have expanded their use of Five9 by adopting our AI and automation solutions to elevate their CX. The first example is a healthcare provider who has been a Five9 customer since 2018. They had been spending approximately $4.5 million annually with Five9. They've been using several advanced solutions from Five9, including our VCC with SMS, AI Agent Assist, and our workflow automation. In Q2, they added our WEM suite, powered by Verint, to perform AQM, performance management, and interaction analytics. With this add-on order, we anticipate their ARR with Five9 to now be over $6.1 million. The next example is a Fortune 200 company and a top-rated insurance provider who has been a Five9 customer for over two years and has been using our Omnichannel, AI, Agent Assist, Voice IVA, Digital IVA, and our Verint WEM suite with an ARR over $4.9 million to Five9. In Q2, they added Five9 AI Insights in order to leverage both real-time and historical conversational data to prescribe and apply the Five9 platform in ways that will result in maximizing business outcomes and truly elevate the customer experience. With this add-on order, we anticipate their ARR with Five9 will now be approximately $5.5 million. While we've had some headwinds in Q2, our long-term outlook remains strong given our leading platform and AI strategy, as well as our continued partner and channel expansion. This was validated once again by the most recent Baird survey in July, where we were ranked number one by far in each of the following three categories: the best AI solutions, most likely to benefit from AI, and the easiest CCaaS provider to work with. And now, I'd like to turn it over to Barry to take you through the financials. Barry?

Thank you, Dan. We reported record revenue of $252.1 million for the second quarter, with the annual run rate exceeding $1 billion. Looking at the components of revenue, as Mike mentioned, LTM Enterprise subscription revenue grew 21%, while Q2 total subscription revenue grew 17% year-over-year, driven by our new logo deployments, which continue to be strong, increasing meaningfully, quarter-over-quarter, from Q1. Our AI and automation portfolio, which now makes up 8% of Enterprise subscription revenue, continues to be the fastest growing category of our products, with AI Agent Assist, our second biggest AI offering after RVA, showing particularly strong growth of 111% year-over-year. Our Enterprise business made up 88% of LTM revenue. Our Commercial business, which represented the remaining 12%, grew again in the single digits on an LTM basis. Recurring revenue, which is comprised of both subscriptions and telecom usage, made up 92% of total Q2 revenue. As a reminder, we expect the one- to three-percentage-point mix shift from subscription to telecom usage each year to continue. The main reason for this is because our larger customers often use their existing carriers for telecom usage. Additionally, our channel partners like BT and AT&T are also carriers, and we will not take business away from them. We see this continuing mix shift as a positive long-term trend for both corporate revenue growth and gross margins. Professional services made up the remaining 8% of revenue. Our LTM database retention rate declined slightly from 109 to 108 as anticipated. Second quarter adjusted gross margins were 60.5%, decreasing by approximately 130 basis points year-over-year primarily driven by the substantial but temporary investments we are making as we scale to support the momentum of our march up market and international expansion. Second quarter adjusted EBITDA was $41.8 million, representing a 16.6% margin, a decrease of approximately 200 basis points year-over-year, primarily driven by investments, most notably in FedRAMP and India, both of which we expect to deliver significant long-term opportunities for it. Second quarter non-GAAP EPS was $0.52 per diluted share, the same as Q2 of 2023. With regards to our balance sheet and cash flow highlights, in Q2, we continued our strong cash flow generation, delivering $126 million of LTM operating cash flow, equivalent to 13% of revenue. This is driven by EBITDA and by our strong DSO performance, which came in at 33 days. We have now delivered 32 consecutive quarters of positive LTM operating cash flow, and we remain optimistic about our potential for continuing cash flow generation. Turning now to guidance. As you know, a quarter ago, we confirmed our annual revenue guidance of 16% year-over-year growth to $1.055 billion, which is based on three key assumptions. First, visibility into the ramp schedule of the backlog. Second, contributions from the new logo go-gets. And third, an inflection in the dollar base retention rate in the second half of the year. With respect to the first item, our assumption around our backlog remains unchanged as we continue to ramp our backlog largely on schedule. However, with regard to the other two factors, we saw trends in the latter part of the second quarter regarding new logo bookings and the dollar-based retention rate, which are causing us to lower our forecast. Therefore, we are now guiding annual revenue to $1.015 billion, which is 3.8% below our prior annual guidance. Let me elaborate in more detail. As Dan explained, our Q2 new logo bookings came in softer than expected, especially in the last few weeks of June, which is when we typically close a majority of our deals. Given that most enterprise new logos generally take three months to go live and four months to ramp, the lower-than-expected go-gets in June bookings are expected to have a negative impact on our Q4 recurring revenue forecast. In addition, the headwind will be particularly strong for PS revenue in both Q3 and Q4 since we start recognizing revenue as soon as implementation work starts. Also, given the softer new logo bookings in Q2, we have prudently adjusted our new logo bookings forecast in the second half which will impact our PS revenue forecast for the remainder of the year. Turning to dollar-based retention rate, while we continue to expect customers with longer than 12 months ramps to positively contribute to the dollar-based retention rate, we are no longer assuming an inflection in the second half of the year. This is because we are prudently assuming a more muted seasonality in our service bookings than what we were originally forecasting to align with weaker economic data points that have been coming out recently, further confirmed by our discussions with top seasonal customers. In terms of Q3, we are guiding revenue to a midpoint of $255 million or 1% quarter-over-quarter growth, the same guidance pattern heading into the third quarter for eight of the last nine years. As for the bottom line, we will be laser-focused on aggressively managing expenses and scrutinizing selective strategic investments to improve profitability in the second half. As a result, we are raising the midpoint of our annual non-GAAP EPS guidance from $2.17 to $2.27. With regards to the quarterly progression of our non-GAAP EPS, we are guiding to a midpoint of $0.58 cents for Q3 and $0.69 cents for Q4, which implies the EBITDA margin to improve sequentially each quarter, with Q4 exceeding 20%. Please note that our top and bottom line guidance does not include any impact from Acqueon. We expect the 2024 revenue impact to be immaterial. Please refer to the presentation posted in our Investor Relations website for additional estimates including share count, taxes, and capital expenditures, as well as a more detailed analysis and visual representation of the TAM expansion from AI that Mike discussed earlier. In summary, we will remain focused on executing against this massive market opportunity that is further expanding with AI, which will drive long-term shareholder value. In addition, we look forward to updating you on our progress of achieving stronger profitability for the remainder of the year.

Our first question today comes from Ryan MacWilliams from Barclays.

Hey, guys, thanks for taking the question. For Barry, just on the headwinds to the dollar-based retention rate, is this mostly macro impacting call volumes, or are you noticing a pickup in customer agent headcount reductions? And were there any changes to churn rates in the quarter? Thanks.

Yes, so I'll take the last part first. In terms of logo churn, no, there was no pickup. Dollar improved, actually, slightly during the quarter. In terms of the impact, the install base is continuing to grow. It is simply growing at a slower rate. What we did was we highlighted our most seasonal customers, Ryan, by going back a few years, looking at the H1 to H2 change which companies were the biggest drivers for that. And it was a tactical bunch, not just in consumer, but also in healthcare and education. Things like fashion, gourmet foods, online education, healthcare insurance, home decor. We spoke with them, and as Dan can elaborate, as we customarily do in the middle of the year. And they are talking about a meaningful reduction in terms of the rate of seasonal uptick in the August to December period. And that's what we took into account.

They're still just covered. They're still adding seats. They’re still adding seasonally, but just doing so in a more conservative manner and not at the rates they once were.

And I didn't address your usage part of the question. For us, they don't move in perfect tandem. And in dollars, of course, the usage from telecom usage grows a bit slower over time, but they tend to move in tandem.

So it's mostly changes in guidance from your customers around their plans for the fourth quarter.

Statistically stated, yes.

Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my question here. Lots of them. I guess I wanted to start off with the end changes in the sales organization. Sounds like a lot of changes. Sounds a little bit like a knee-jerk reaction to a single quarter, especially given your bookings last four quarters, five quarters have been generally pretty positive. You guys have been fired up with some large ones there. Help us understand why all these changes, and I guess is it really a reaction to the second quarter or something more broadly that you're trying to roll out?

Yes, thanks, Scott. And one thing just to note, we're in a room that we may be audibly challenged, so we're trying to speak up because we heard our mic wasn't quite picking up the audio. We're going to be speaking a little louder than normal. If you have trouble hearing us, do not hesitate to let us know, and we'll repeat ourselves. But no, this was absolutely not a knee-jerk reaction in any way, shape, or form. It’s really a situation where we had an EVP of sales several years ago who has been stretched thin with lots of different responsibilities across the company. I just wanted to ensure that we had somebody every single day that is 100% dedicated to the sales execution, making sure we have the right market coverage, realigning our segments. I know we've talked about commercial and mid-market and enterprise and strategic teams to ensure that we've got the most optimal coverage model to maximize our bookings. So nothing… it's not a lot of changes. It’s really just adding more expertise and more focus into the sales execution. And that's going to be for the long haul. We had an EVP of sales leave about four years ago. I said I'm not going to replace them. I'll just roll up my sleeves and do it all. We've now come to a point where we're a $1 billion company on a run rate basis and really feel like we need to add to the leadership team. So that's what we've done.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. I guess, if you're looking at how the contract terms for a bunch of the AI and automation products are shaping up, how are your customers looking at purchasing that and how much of a change in dynamic of a revenue model do you expect to occur over the next couple of years? And sort of wrapped in that, can that maybe offset some of these lower seasonal upticks on a seat basis by adding more product? Thanks.

Thanks, Matt. I'll start. Dan, feel free to chime in, but we've talked about pricing for a while now in terms of AI and automation solutions. We offer both consumption-based pricing and other models for all of our AI solutions. I want to be clear about that. Some are more appropriate on a per seat basis, some are more appropriate on a per port basis, some are more appropriate on a consumption basis and, quite frankly, we offer options to our customers relative to that. We've also talked about the expanded TAM from AI, and you'll see on our investor presentation up on the website quantification of that. I talked about it in my prepared remarks. In a 15% automation case where 15% of transactions go to self-service, we get a 30% increase in our TAM. Happy to do a little more math. There’s math in that slide on the investor deck as well. But Dan, feel free to chime in.

Yes, no, you said it well. And absolutely, we want to give flexibility to the customers to purchase in the way that fits their business model the best. Sometimes that's per seat, and various AI products that don't really tie to a seat, like Insight as an example. I gave one of the examples of customers. That’s across the domain or across the tenant, if you will. Certain things are best done on a consumption basis. Whether that be on a per minute, like our long-distance usage, or whether it be on a per gig of data. We have transcription services and summary services. And so those are clearly… some people want to just add that to their seat if it's for a human, but others will want to simply do it on a consumption basis, especially when we're transcribing and delivering summaries of things like IVAs or DVAs. They really don't tie to an agent, so therefore, it’s more appropriate to do it on a consumption.

All right, perfect. Thank you, guys. So I understood, I think, what you were saying about the seasonal patterns and how you're baking that into outlook. But when you think about the June bookings, how much of that would you attribute to macro versus go-to-market execution? And then Barry, what would you encourage us to think from June bookings and Q4 seasonality as we just think about our 2025 growth estimates? Thank you.

Yes, great question about the bookings. It's absolutely a combination of the two. I mean, when we look at it and we say is the scrutiny and budget constraints macro, in some senses, sure. Budgets are tight, people are prioritizing. You got to build and deliver a very compelling ROI to get to the top of the stack and get prioritized. But there's also sales execution that, in my mind, wasn’t up to par. We’ve had one of the most, and continue to have the most productive world-class sales organizations that we're extremely proud of, but we’re never going to rest on our laurels. We're always going to want to look for new ways to maximize effectiveness and maximize success. Just adding more focus. executing at an even higher level is something we’re looking forward to. A little bit of macro, a little bit of sales execution, little bit of customers having all this technology coming at them, not only from us and from other folks right within our space, but lots of SaaS products face the same dilemma, which is how do you help the customers prioritize their budgets. We remain very bullish about the future. Our portfolio is continuing to be very accepted by our customers and prospects, and they love where we're going with everything. So long-term, we think we're in a driver's seat to help drive this market.

Arjun, with respect to 2025, we would love to give you an outlook, but we are creatures of habit, and we customarily do this in November when we report our third quarter, give it an initial look, and then firm it up later on. Especially given the current turbulence in the economic environment, we prefer to stick to that pattern.

Great, I turned into a Fisher as opposed to a Fish, but I don't have as good of a shirt as Ben Fleet, but apologies for that. I did want to work off of Ryan's prior question on kind of two aspects, guys. You guys had been expecting NRR to be troughing. I get the rationale why, but why wouldn't NRR kind of stay at this range into the foreseeable future? And how much do these AI cross-sells actually impact NRR at this point?

So again, let me take the last part first. Cross-sell for AI is somewhat helpful, but to be perfectly candid, the attach rate is much higher on the new bookings. It's still a very small part of the install base that it just can't move the needle that materially. In terms of NRR, you do need to think of it in terms of two buckets, a smaller but important top bucket and a bigger bottom bucket. In terms of the top bucket, these are the mega deals, as we found of calling them, that take more than 12 months to go live and therefore help the dollar-based retention rate in the meantime. That has been the case. We predicted it would be the case, and it is a case with normal ebbs and flows. Where we are seeing clearly that some slowing of the growth of the dollar-based retention rate has been in the bottom bucket, if you will, the regular run-of-the-mill deals. We know, as sure as one can be, that it's not due to the negative aspects of AI. It's not that people are reducing their seats because of AI; it's simply because of the macro environment. When we speak to these customers, we look at things like, I forget the exact phraseology, but challenging environment, constrained, we're getting out of that particular business, etc. And that’s what's driving the dollar-based retention rate. One thing, though, that we’re supremely confident about is that, at a certain point in time, we don’t know when, the economy will rebound, and we’ll be in an extremely good position because our lower retention has been excellent. It’s easy to add seats to accommodate that extra growth.

Thanks for taking my question. I want to focus on the acquisition of Acqueon. Looks like you have partnered with them for more than two years now, and you guys talked about some of the deals like ARR, more than $1 million, $1.5 million kind of per deal basis. So help us understand how many customers they have, what kind of overlap you have, and what's the revenue run rate they have? And, Barry, like when you said, no revenue contribution is immaterial, is it because of the debt for write-down or anything else?

Yes, Barry, I'll start, and then you can chime in. Siti, thanks for the question. Yes, we're really excited about Acqueon. They, as I said in my remarks, they bring us an ability to expand into a broader CX category beyond inbound customer service. Now we have outbound solutions, but there's an omnichannel outbound proactive engagement platform and it's best-in-class. It really brings us into the world of marketing and e-commerce and sales in some respects. So it's a massive opportunity. It's a big step for us on our mission to be the orchestration engine for interactions between a brand and the consumer across the entire customer journey. In terms of the size of the business, it's still a pretty small business. Yes, that's the kind of acquisition we look for—great technology, very innovative, very synergistic in terms of the customers that we win together. Some of the largest of our large enterprise customers, our megas, are using Acqueon. To us, that is a huge proof point, and you heard the size of the deals from an ARR perspective in terms of the Acqueon solution. This is not a tiny revenue opportunity going forward, even though it's a fairly early-stage company that I frankly think we picked them up at the perfect time. So that's the kind of acquisition we like to do. Barry?

Yes. And while the company is going to be growing, currently, it's still quite small, as Mike said. In particular, with respect to Q4, and you alluded to this in your question, we need to look at all of their contracts in detail, put them under Five9 accounting policies, and see what sort of haircut there is. There will be a haircut; we know that already. We just haven't had the time to do that yet. So stay tuned. We'll keep you fully informed about what actually transpired.

Yes, thanks for taking my question. It's a bit of a multi-parter, but there's a number of things to unpack. So hopefully you'll bear with me here. I mean, this is one of those areas that I feel like is an imperative. Contact centers, we've all been talking about it for a while as well. If you want to do AI and automation improves, yes, you got to get to the cloud. So with some of the deals that slipped out of June, and you didn't close any mega deals, I think you said, I mean, what are they saying? Are they just going to kick the can down the curve to '25 or '26? Or do you think some of these deals are going to close in Q3 and Q4 and you just want to be conservative? And kind of related to this, because of these mega trends, what are you seeing at the top of the funnel and around demand gen? Is any of that changing some of those forward-leading indicators? Thank you.

Yes, thanks, Terry. I'll start and feel free to chime in, Barry and Mike. If you look at the quarter or the end of June in particular, which is, we naturally, like many sales organizations, have quite a hockey stick right at the end of the quarter. Some of the decisions, like you said, are they just going to stick with premises or kick it down the road some more? It’s less that and more looking at the prioritization of their budgets. They have to look at things that will return right away. Many things, in some of the larger mega deals and multimillion-dollar annual deals, they know that ROI isn't going to start realizing itself for a year plus. This is one of those things that are easy to say, 'Oh, we need a return in the next six months.' That's not even going to start generating a return for over a year. The other thing to note is that we had some pushes as well that just pushed out into the next quarters. One of the reasons for our adjusted guidance is that those deals that happen from now on don’t contribute to the year in terms of revenue. So as bullish as we are with our pipeline and with our market coverage and top of funnel, as you mentioned, it still doesn't help us for this year because the commercial business, yes, we can get that up and running and the stuff we sell in the quarter; we can get a little bit of revenue by the end of the year. But for the enterprise and strategic business, those are definitely 2025 impacts to the revenue number. Anything else?

Yes, I'll just add one thing, Terry, and that is RFPs continue to be at record levels. To me, that's always a good indicator of the health of the demand in the market. We see that continue to stay at that new normal, which is relatively double what it was, say, five or six quarters ago.

One other thing to add; we talked about our partnerships. We're also seeing our channel partners and our routes to market enjoying substantial success. As I mentioned, they rated us in the Baird survey number one and easy to do business with, number one in preferring our AI story and solutions, and number one, as far as most likely, of all the folks that they distribute, to benefit most from AI. They chose Five9 by far. We're feeling very good about that approach, and they help fill the top of the funnel along with us.

Hey guys. So Barry, your old guidance had pretty material re-acceleration baked in for the second half. It was predicated on kind of the implementation backlog standing up where it sounds like nothing has really changed there. And then the seasonal stuff kicking in, right? I understand that’s not happening. Does this mean that the acceleration gets pushed out by a couple of quarters or is what you’re seeing now calling into doubt that re-acceleration happens?

So we cannot comment, DJ, on the timing of the re-acceleration because we’re giving our guidance and we’re not going to go beyond that. We’ve been pretty explicit about that. I do want to step back a little and clarify. The biggest, most material issue by a margin is the lower go-gets that we referred to. You may be surprised by that, but we get meaningful PS revenue, especially as the companies go higher in the chain and scale. Second, we share a number that’s a little bit lower than our internal forecast, but we don’t want to do this more than once every ten years. This is not an environment for big beats, but that’s the second biggest problem. The third biggest is the seasonality, and that’s actually the ordinal ranking. I wanted to get that off my chest.

Yes, hi, thank you so much. Can you guys hear me? Perfect, awesome. I know the place was not so great service. So that’s good. Barry, maybe just wondering if you could give us a little bit of color on the three different buckets and how those might be impacting the guide. For instance, if we look at the old guide and the incremental recurring revenue or ARR needed in the second half to hit that guide, could you give us a sense of the portion of that coming from existing ramps, new logos, and the seasonal increase, and how that might differ under the new guide just so we can have some help there in quantifying it.

Yes. Thank you, Taylor. What I'm actually going to do is talk about the recurring revenue increase year-over-year, assuming 8% peers for the second half of this year as well. From memory, maybe off a little bit, but not by much, we’re talking about a year-over-year increase in the second half of recurring revenue in the order of $42 million. The breakout of that is roughly 70% of that coming from the install base, and 30% from the new logo, the professional services, and the recurring revenue in the fourth quarter.

Thanks for squeezing me in here. I appreciate all the color, maybe just one on this gross margin, not margin. You've seen some compression. You talked about FedRAMP investments on the infrastructure, but they need to show us like, when's the inflection, right? Because I think that’s maybe one pain point for some is we’re not seeing the leverage in the model as we would have expected at this point in time.

Mike, can I take that?

Sure, Barry, go ahead.

We're going to see inflection in gross margins in the second half of the year. We’ve guided to that explicitly with our $2.27 EPS. You can get from there to the EBITDA margin, which we’ve said explicitly: Q3 will be higher than Q2, and Q4 will be higher than Q3, exceeding 20%. We feel very good about that, Peter. There are no 100% certainties, but the stars and the moon are aligning to get some dividends. We also continue with FedRAMP. FedRAMP was material, but it doesn't hit too much in the core aspect. India might come live pretty soon, and between all of these initiatives starting to pay dividends, we will see improved gross margins in the second half.

And if I can, are you seeing any pricing compression just on their core voice contact center seat? I know it’s typically been $150 per month. Is that steady? Are you seeing any – I know there’s a lot more competitors in the space today than there were 12, 24 months ago. Maybe just any color on the core voice seat?

Yes, it’s stayed very steady. In fact, there’s occasions on a deal-by-deal basis where somebody will get super aggressive to try to buy business, but for the most part, we've maintained very, very steady pricing on the core. The beauty there is we've got so much more add-on SKUs that when we look at a given customer, and we used to sell an enterprise with 10,000 employees and you’ve got, let’s say, 1,000 seats or so, when we would go into those environments, the revenue that we could extract or get the wallet share from that customer was much lower, even just two or three years ago, because we’ve added so much more to the portfolio. When you start looking at the different AI solutions we have, obviously the IVA is the most common and most prevalent, but then you've got the whole WEM suite. We’ve got other partnerships that we have brought in to resell other products. We're getting more and more. If you look at our revenue per seat metric, it’s continued to rise steadily across our base over time. So it’s not price erosion; it’s actually been moving in the other direction positively.

Great, thanks so much. Maybe a question just on you noted sales execution, but I guess I just wanted to get a sense of, is the time to get these deals signed off on elongating just because of the amount of things that you're throwing into the RFPs? Like while you’re trying to throw in kind of AI and other pieces of it, it’s just kind of taking longer to get those approvals more so than execution. And then just as a second question, I know you guys have kind of expanded the professional services into the channel or kind of enabled more implementation by the channel. Just any different trends that you’re seeing there, thanks.

Yes, thanks Meta. To cover the first one, as far as the added approvals and several extra meetings with all the data flowing around with AI and all the different solutions, absolutely you have more meetings, but that’s been the case for several quarters. We’ve talked about that for the last year, year to two years. Once you have that initial delay, it shouldn’t affect sales. It's just that we started the deals earlier when they come in. We track very closely days to close from the moment that the opportunities enter our system to when it closes. It had elongated a little bit a while back because of that extra time. In Q2, we had some elongated sales cycles as well, but I don’t equate it with that and the approvals necessary as much as I do with the budgets and the prioritization. The timing of customers is that they're in the same boat, right? They’re looking at the macro economy and having trouble pulling the trigger on spending their entire budgets, and they’ve had budgets being reduced too. It’s just a more competitive environment, not so much with our direct competitors, but you’re competing for overall spend by those enterprises. Some of those folks have perceived a pause or delay or pushed some of their budget to later in the year because they want to wait and see what’s going to happen with the economy as well.

And Meta, I’ll comment on your other question about what we call project pull-through. This enables third-party partners to do the implementations. We continue to see the percentage of implementations being done by partners increase consistently every quarter. Andy and the team have done a great job of just leaning in with more partners. We’re still being pretty focused here in terms of how many partners we’re allowing to do this because, again, we’ve always taken a lot of pride in that, and we’re making sure our partners continue to do that, and they are doing it very well.

Hi, good evening. Thank you for taking my questions. First, I appreciate all the disclosure. There are many factors at play, but regarding the implied Q4 guidance, it suggests 9% subscription revenue growth, Barry. I’m trying to understand what this means for new book dollars in the first half of the year compared to 2023. Is new book ARR down, flat, or up? More importantly, in Q2, the significant $40 million reduction to the implied Q4 number indicates that new bookings might be declining or contracting. Could you clarify this for us?

Yes, great question, Samad. One thing you got to understand is that the mega deals and those million-dollar deals cause lumpiness in quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year. When I say a Q2 versus a Q2, you may recall last year in Q2, we had a significant $20 million insurance company that we booked. We didn’t have that this quarter. So could you say that bookings were down? You could, but the revenue that $20 million insurance company is generating, that’s a long implementation cycle. So the health of the bookings that occurred meaning the timing of when they convert to revenue, we didn’t have any of those big mega deals that are going to start revenue in a year or two from now. So in one sense, most of that will get revenue starting at the beginning of 2025. So it’s hard to just look at a singular quarter and ascertain and come to a conclusion that there’s an impact. It depends on what’s in those bookings. If you take out some of those big anomalies, we had a very, very steady solid quarter. I’ll put it that way. We didn’t have those big deals; overall, pipeline’s healthy. We feel very good about the top of the funnel, as well as what we’re forecasting for the remainder of the year.

Great, and then maybe just to follow up, I fully appreciate the complexity of, we have a world that is changing rapidly, and there’s a lot of volatility. I guess my question though is it feels like it’s been about four to six quarters where it seems the visibility and the guidance are lower or maybe there may not be as much visibility as anticipated. Just as I look at the guidance history, is it time to maybe rethink the way that you’re building up your guidance? You’re making some kind of permanent change to the assumptions. Because I think that’s creating volatility in our estimates and in the outlooks; I’m just curious if there’s any rethinking on the framework to guidance in and of itself.

Samad, very fair question. The only issue I have with it is the tense. It’s implying a future tense about the rethinking. We rethought; we’re not going to have big beats. It’s not the environment for them, but we looked for every foreseeable thing that we could look for and put it in there. Of course, there’s always, as Donald Rumsfeld said, unknown unknowns, but leaving that as a singular exception. We’ve done the very best we can. We don’t like the environment that we’re in.

Hey guys, good evening. Thank you for the question. So kind of related to the last question, Barry, on the derisking of the guidance and the confidence level in the guidance, I understand you talk to customers to help you think about the back half of the year. Maybe you’ve got a little bit less ramp in Q4. What is your impression though, the customer’s outlook for the economy? There’s a lot of debate around recession, no recession. Does their outlook incorporate a recessionary environment or not? And if that did occur, would that be more downside to your guidance?

Yes, great question, Michael. Thank you. It's perplexing. There’s this huge debate about are we in a recession? Are we going into recession? Are we not? Jamie Dimon taking it from 20% to 35% risk. You look at the Bank of America credit and debit card spending. In June, it was down per household by 0.5. By the way, that’s nominal; in real terms, it’s negative. JPMorgan Chase data is similar. We look at actual internal data, and it’s clear that it’s not as strong as it was in the past. In short, the debate goes on; we are seeing weakness amongst not just the consumer vertical, but one or two others a little bit, which we’ve allowed for in the projection. We also see a little bit in healthcare and education, which are other two verticals that have some degree of seasonality.

I would just add, Michael, that we talk to our customers; we talk to our seasonal customers. While they cite kind of the economic conditions, they usually stop short of predicting recession versus something less than that. So again, we look at the comments from those discussions with all of our seasonal customers and we talk to all of them; they’re obviously citing just this uncertainty out there.

Sure. Our customers’ comments are things like ongoing choppiness, retailer cautiousness, challenges from global macro and geopolitical, we don’t know, and this is not Five9 speaking; this is our customer. They expect macro headwinds to continue throughout this year, etc.

Hi, thank you for taking the question. On your $1 million ARR deals, typically that's where you really have your bread and butter during the quarter. So can you poke a little bit more? Is that a lot a very competitive area now with more players, pricing pressure, or is it just a delay? Because it seems like you’re saying the funnel is healthy and the pipeline’s healthy. So I'm just trying to reconcile that.

It's delay and timing, and our deal sizes were smaller this quarter. Yes, I can’t put my finger on a precise reason, but when you look back and take a look at the overall health of the pipeline, yes, it just was a lull for us. Not concerned about it. We’re taking action to ensure we can make up for it and get back on the track that we love being on, which is to execute at a very high level. We set a high standard for ourselves, and we like to always live up to it. We didn’t do that in Q2, but rest assured, we feel very good about our long-term prospects all the way back to the beginning and the top of the funnel. The customer sentiment's strong across the board, and we feel great about the long-term future.

Yes, again, thank you to all Five9 employees for their dedication. We remain very excited about the future in this market and we will keep you posted as the next couple of quarters unfold. Thanks for joining.