Thank you for joining us for the Honeywell Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that today's call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Sean Meakim, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Honeywell's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. On the call with me today are Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Vimal Kapur; and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mike Stepniak. This webcast and the presentation materials, including non-GAAP reconciliations, are available on our Investor Relations website. From time to time, we post new information that may be of interest or material to our investors on this website. Our discussion today includes forward-looking statements that are based on our best view of the world and of our businesses as we see them today and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the ones described in our SEC filings. This morning, we will review our financial results for the third quarter, share our guidance for the fourth quarter and provide an update on full year 2025. As always, we'll leave time for your questions at the end. I'll turn the call over to Chairman and CEO, Vimal Kapur.

Thank you, Sean, and good morning, everyone. Honeywell continued its strong 2025 performance in the third quarter. Growth in organic sales took another step up and finished ahead of expectations, driven by our commitment to developing new solutions that solve our customers' most challenging problems. Better top line results translated into earnings well above our guided range, while strong orders across the portfolio demonstrate early results of our focus on innovation. Our excellent third quarter performance is powering another increase in our full year guidance. We are raising our 2025 EPS guide for the third time this year even as we incorporate the impact of impairing the spin-off of Solstice Advanced Materials. Barely a year since we announced our intent to separate Advanced Materials, today, we are a week out from Solstice's first day of trading as an independent company. Our swift progress to this point demonstrates our ability to diligently execute carefully crafted work plans with speed and efficacy. We have the right resources in place to deliver on both our portfolio transformation and our businesses, financial and operational targets. We will carry the learnings and momentum from Solstice to next year's separation of Aerospace. As we look to our future as three independent companies in 2026, we are proactively planning to realign the structure of our automation business at the beginning of next year to reflect how we will operate going forward. This move is another significant step in our simplification of Honeywell, which will provide the strategic focus, organizational agility, and tailored capital allocation to grow faster and drive value for all our stakeholders. Please turn to Slide 3 for the latest update of our separation. A couple of weeks ago, Solstice held a well-attended Investor Day in New York, where David Sewell and his new management team presented a compelling vision for the new specialty materials company and how its rich history and new independent strategy will unleash its growth potential and unlock long-term stakeholder value. A week from today, on October 30, Honeywell shareholders will receive new shares of Solstice, which will begin trading as a separate public company. I want to thank the teams that achieved this important milestone well ahead of the original schedule to complete by early 2026. I'm extremely excited about the opportunities in front of Solstice, and I will be cheering on the success in the years ahead. As our planned separation of Aerospace in the second half of 2026 approaches, our Board has been intently focused on assembling a Honeywell Aerospace leadership team with the right mix of industry, company and capital market experiences to maximize value for our customers, partners, employees, and our shareholders. We expect to make an Aerospace leadership and headquarters announcement later this year. The separation of Aerospace brings the opportunity to further simplify Honeywell Automation. As a result, we have proactively designed a new, simpler structure aligned to the future of the business, which I will discuss in more detail in the next slide. As we seek to better position the future independent aerospace and automation companies for success, we have opportunistically completed transactions to simplify the legacy liabilities left on our balance sheet. During the third quarter, we entered into an agreement to divest all our Bendix asbestos liability on attractive terms for all parties. We also terminated an indemnification and reimbursement agreement with Resideo in exchange for $1.6 billion in cash. In combination, these transactions resulted in net cash inflow and will simplify and derisk our balance sheet, providing the company with fewer administrative burdens and greater financial flexibility to focus on creating value for our core business. On Slide 4, I will go over segment realignment in more detail. We announced yesterday that we are planning to reorganize the Honeywell Automation segment into a simplified structure focused on cohesive, synergetic business models. I'm pleased to take this next step in evolving Honeywell's streamlined portfolio with the aim of unlocking incremental value and driving long-term growth and margin expansion. As such, effective beginning of the first quarter of 2026, we plan to report four business segments: Aerospace Technologies, Building Automation, Process Automation and Technology, and Industrial Automation. Ahead of the upcoming aerospace separation, this new structure serves as an elegant way to continue simplifying the remaining portfolio and align our external segments to the way we are increasingly driving our operation through consistent business models. Our differentiated approach underscores our ability to grow our installed base in two ways: by selling mission-critical products through channel and by delivering strategic projects for our customers. We then mine this installed base by providing customers with high-value outcome-based solutions with a combination of software and services. The three remaining reporting segments will be organized into six strategic business units with each of our businesses aligned to our unified automation strategy, enabling us to solve enterprise-level challenges and help our customers achieve new levels of optimization with the Honeywell Forge platform. Aerospace reporting is unchanged ahead of separation in the second half of next year. The new structure will allow us to better prioritize R&D efforts, capital expenditure, and go-to-market strategy with a growth mindset. Building Automation will continue to be a leading provider of unified building automation solutions, delivering safer, more sustainable, integrated buildings and infrastructure assets and maintain its Products and Solutions business unit structure. Process Automation and Technology is a combination of core Honeywell Process Solutions and UOP, the global leader in process technology. These businesses have developed powerful commercial synergies, enjoy leading positions in the process market globally with a vast installed base and share very similar business model characteristics. PA&T will report projects and aftermarket business units. Industrial Automation's portfolio of products and solutions businesses includes mission-critical offerings with proven reliability and tenured channel relationships, positioning us to benefit from ongoing global reshoring themes. With this realignment following the separation of Aerospace next year, Honeywell will be a premier pure-play automation company, leading the future of automation through high ROI outcome-based solutions for customers across a large addressable set of markets. And as we continue our journey of transforming the portfolio, I would like to highlight another lever of value creation with the recently announced Quantinuum capital raise on Slide 5. Four years ago, we formed the world's most advanced full-stack quantum computing company. It has rapidly progressed quantum technology along the path to universal fault-tolerant computing, a more than two-decade pursuit that is soon to be realized. Technological progress has driven fundraising momentum. Less than two years after completing an equity capital raise at a $5 billion pre-money valuation, the company announced in September a second raise at double the prior valuation. As important as the capital contributions will be to advancing the development of quantum computing at scale, the collaboration with new shareholders such as Quanta and NVIDIA, in addition to others like JPMorgan, Amgen, and Mitsui, may prove even more critical. Quantinuum's fundraising efforts have led to a new partnership that will support the development of critical applications for improving drug discovery, government and military cybersecurity, and encryption for large financial institutions. While we are tremendously excited about the future of the business, we recognize we are not the best long-term owner, and it will eventually need its own capital structure to fully exploit its growth potential. As a result, Honeywell will seek to begin monetizing its stake in the company at the appropriate time in a manner that will create meaningful value for Honeywell shareholders. The most recent capital raise will sustain Quantinuum through that point in time. I will now turn the call over to Mike to go through our third quarter results beginning on Slide 6.

Thank you, Vimal, and good morning to everyone joining us. Honeywell delivered exceptional third quarter results, again, exceeding the high end of organic growth and adjusted earnings per share guidance as we have done each quarter this year. Organic sales accelerated to 6% year-over-year, led by a return to double-digit growth in Aerospace and a fourth straight quarter of high single-digit growth in Building Automation. Orders grew 22% organically from the previous year to $11.9 billion. While wins for long-cycle aerospace and energy projects led the way, the increase was broad-based with order growth accelerating in each of our four segments and an overall book-to-bill above 1. The results are encouraging and an early demonstration of our focus on growth through innovative new products and the impact of our increased R&D investments. This impressive commercial performance pushed our backlog up to yet another record, which positions us well for future growth. Segment profit increased 5% from the prior year, with segment margin meeting the high end of our guidance range, led by ongoing margin expansion in Building Automation. Earnings per share in the third quarter was $2.86, up 32% from the prior year. Adjusted earnings per share was $2.82, up 9% year-over-year as strong segment profit growth and lower effective tax rate more than offset higher interest expense. You can find additional information on the year-over-year changes in the third quarter adjusted earnings per share in the appendix of our presentation. Third quarter free cash flow was $1.5 billion, down 16% from the prior year because of the capital expenditures timing and modestly higher working capital to support our sales growth. We maintained our disciplined capital allocation approach in the quarter, returning $800 million to shareholders while committing $400 million to high-return capital projects and completing two technology tuck-in acquisitions. Now let's move to Slide 7 for a discussion on our third quarter segment performance. I will provide a brief overview of results with additional commentary included on the right-hand side of the slide. Aerospace Technologies grew 12% organically, led by strength in both commercial aftermarket and Defense and Space. Commercial OE returned to growth as expected as our sales recoupled to the delivery rates of our large customers. Orders momentum continued with strong double-digit orders growth across all three end markets and book-to-bill of 1.2. On a year-over-year basis, segment margin decreased 160 basis points to 26.1% as commercial excellence and volume leverage were more than offset by cost inflation and acquisition-related headwinds. However, sequentially, margin improved 60 basis points on strong quarter-over-quarter volume supported by improved supply chain performance. Industrial Automation sales returned to growth in the third quarter, increasing 1% organically and exceeding our guidance range, led by continued strength in our Sensing business. Segment margin in Industrial Automation declined 150 basis points from the prior year to 18.8% as commercial excellence and productivity benefits were more than offset by inflationary pressures. Building Automation again delivered high single-digit growth for the quarter. Organic sales increased 7% from the previous year, driven by strength in both building solutions and building products. Regionally, North America and the Middle East led while Europe grew organically for a fourth consecutive quarter. Margin expanded 80 basis points year-over-year as we leverage our strong volume performance. Energy and Sustainability Solutions performed in line with expectations in the third quarter, down 2% organically. Strong refrigerants performance in Advanced Materials was offset by licensing and catalyst delivery delays in UOP. Segment margin was flat versus the prior year at 24.5% as one-time government reimbursement for past legal costs and the lift from margin-accretive acquisition offset cost and volume headwinds. Let's turn now to Slide 8 to discuss our updated outlook for the year. Our guidance for the year now incorporates the impact of Solstice's separation from Honeywell at the end of October. The spin is expected to reduce 2025 sales by $700 million, adjusted earnings per share by approximately $0.21 and free cash flow by $200 million. Even with this impact, we're again raising our 2025 organic sales and adjusted earnings per share guidance as we fully pass through our strong third quarter segment profit and net income growth into our improved outlook. On a like-for-like basis, our free cash flow expectations for the year remain unchanged. Now I'll turn to Slide 9 to provide more details on fourth quarter and full year guidance. We are taking up full year organic sales growth guidance by 150 basis points from the midpoint of our previous range. We now expect growth of approximately 6% for the year or 5% when excluding the prior year impact from the Bombardier agreement. This new outlook builds upon our strong sales momentum in recent quarters while maintaining a pragmatic approach in the face of elevated geopolitical tensions and macro uncertainty. Full year sales are now projected to be $40.7 billion to $40.9 billion. We anticipate a fourth quarter organic sales growth of 8% to 10% or 4% to 6%, excluding Bombardier, which translates to sales of $10.1 billion to $10.3 billion. For the full year, we now expect our company segment margin to be up 30 to 40 basis points or to be down 40 to 30 points excluding Bombardier. We're anticipating modestly lower margins versus prior guidance, a result of reduced expectations for project licensing, catalyst shipments, and certain short-cycle Industrial Automation products, which carry high incremental margins. We are offsetting most of these headwinds by leveraging our strong volume growth and utilizing our accelerated operating model to implement productivity actions. In the fourth quarter, we expect segment margin to be in the range of 22.5% to 22.8%, up 160 to 190 basis points or down 120 to 90 basis points, excluding Bombardier. We now anticipate full year earnings per share of $10.60 to $10.70, up 7% to 8% or up 5% to 6%, excluding the impact of both the 2024 Bombardier agreement and the impending Solstice spin-off. Earnings per share in the fourth quarter is expected to be $2.52 to $2.62, up 2% to 6% from the prior year or down 6% to 3%, excluding the effects of Bombardier and Solstice. I will give additional details on changes to the full year EPS guidance later in my prepared remarks. We expect free cash flow between $5.2 billion and $5.6 billion, down 2% to up 5%, excluding the effects of Bombardier and Solstice. We provide additional information on the changes in the year-over-year free cash flow in the appendix of the presentation. For the first three quarters of the year, we have deployed $9 billion for share repurchases, acquisitions, dividends, and capital projects. Going forward, we will continue to be opportunistic in allocating additional capital beyond debt already committed to the highest return opportunities. Please turn to Slide 10 for details on our segment level outlook for the year. In Aerospace Technologies, we are raising our expectations for full year sales growth to be in the low double-digit range or high single digit when excluding the impact of the 2024 Bombardier agreement. We expect robust Defense and Space growth to continue as our supply chain is improving and our global demand is benefiting from ramping national defense budgets. Commercial aftermarket sales should expand at a healthy rate with air transport growth outpacing business aviation. We anticipate commercial OE sales growth to accelerate for the remainder of the year as our shipments progressively realign to build schedules. For the fourth quarter, we expect Aero organic sales to be up double digits or high single digits, excluding Bombardier, led by Defense and Space. Commercial aftermarket growth should moderate from third quarter levels towards the longer-term trend. Excluding the year-over-year impact of Bombardier, commercial OE should grow faster than the prior quarter. We anticipate the second quarter marked the low point of Aerospace margins, and fourth quarter margins will be comparable to the third. For the full year, margins are expected to be approximately 26% as volume leverage is more than offset by transitory integration headwinds from the CAES acquisition and cost inflation from tariff pressures temporarily outpacing pricing. In 2026, as pricing aligns with tariff costs, OE shipments of electronic solutions recouple with build rates and integration costs from the CAES acquisition subside, Aerospace margins are well positioned to increase from 2025 levels. For Industrial Automation, third quarter outperformance is compelling us to raise our full year top line expectations for a second consecutive quarter from down low to mid-single digits to down only low single digits. Positive order growth in the third quarter was encouraging, though it was uneven within both long- and short-cycle businesses, such that it would not yet be prudent to confirm a sustainable upward trend. As a result of these mix dynamics and a more challenging prior year comparison, we expect fourth quarter sales to be down low single digits. Continued momentum in smart energy and steady performance in Sensing and warehouse automation should offset modest demand headwinds in productivity solutions and services and short-term project pushouts in core process solutions. We now expect to see margin contraction in Industrial Automation for the full year on increasingly unfavorable mix with similar margin performance in the fourth quarter. In Building Automation, we continue to anticipate full year organic sales growth in the mid-single-digit to high single-digit range, supported by strength in the U.S., Middle East, and India, and highlighted by robust demand in data centers, healthcare, and hospitality. For the fourth quarter, we expect sales to be up mid-single digits with momentum from strong orders across both products and solutions. We anticipate a fifth consecutive quarter of organic growth for products to be broad-based across fire, BMS, and Security. Solutions should continue to drive solid year-over-year growth in both projects and services. We expect margins for the full year and the fourth quarter to expand meaningfully as tailwinds from volume leverage and productivity actions continue. In Energy and Sustainability Solutions, we will limit our guidance commentary on Advanced Materials given its pending separation as an independent company. We are maintaining our full year ESS sales growth guidance of flat to up slightly and anticipate fourth quarter sales to be down low single digits year-over-year. A difficult macro backdrop for energy has weighed on our near-term guidance, but the long-term outlook remains strong. A third quarter increase in UOP orders of 9% is a signal of growing underlying demand from our customers, and we have good visibility into project order strength continuing. On segment margin, we anticipate a meaningful fourth quarter contraction, resulting in a roughly 1 point reduction for the full year. Lower high-margin catalyst and licensing sales are offsetting commercial excellence and uplift from the LNG and Sundyne acquisitions. While cost inflation and market headwinds have presented a margin challenge in 2025, we're taking meaningful steps to address ESS cost structure and expect to return to margin expansion in 2026. Let's move to Slide 11 to go through updates on our 2025 EPS walk. Our earnings growth attribution comments separate out the year-over-year impact of Solstice spin-off at the end of the month, which is anticipated to reduce adjusted earnings per share by $0.21. We now expect segment profit growth, both organic and contribution from acquisitions, to add $0.63 to adjusted EPS for the full year, $0.10 better than our previous view as we fully flow through better-than-anticipated third quarter operating results. Third quarter outperformance versus the midpoint of our guidance range benefited from a lower effective tax rate and reduced below-the-line expenses, which were also benefiting the full year. Fourth quarter segment profit contributions to earnings are in line with our prior expectations as better Aerospace growth offsets margin headwinds in Energy and Sustainability Solutions and Industrial Automation, as discussed earlier. We anticipate reduced year-over-year below-the-line headwinds of $0.39 per share as repositioning will be at the low end of our prior range. Additional below-the-line details are available in the appendix of the presentation. We now expect our full year effective tax rate to be 19% compared to 20% previously, adding $0.13 to adjusted earnings per share. To summarize, we anticipate 2025 adjusted EPS to grow at a mid-single-digit rate when excluding the impact of the Solstice spin and Bombardier agreement. Now I'll hand the call back over to Vimal to finish our prepared comments on Slide 12.

Thanks, Mike. Honeywell again exceeded its initial commitment in the third quarter as Aerospace execution returned that business to double-digit year-over-year growth. With orders increasing in each of our four segments, we are getting good returns from dedicating the right level of resources to creating new solutions to sell into our large global customer base. As just one example of our recent commercial success, Gulfstream recently announced that Honeywell's engines and avionics will power its new super midsized G300 business jet platform, which will offer superior range, efficiency, and safety to current comparable aircraft. This win is a testament to our ability to stay at the forefront of leading-edge technologies that matter most to our customers. We are going into the final quarter of 2025 from a position of strength with operating momentum leading us to raise our guidance for the third time this year even as a shifting macro environment requires a high level of agility to deliver these results. We are pleased by the performance of our acquisitions since 2023, which continue to help us shape our portfolio and deliver higher growth and margins. Our commercial and operational momentum are building into 2026, which will be a historic year for Honeywell. At the same time, we are operating with the same commitment to operational excellence that has defined Honeywell for decades. While 2025 was affected by a number of headwinds, including heightened economic uncertainty, incremental tariffs, and significant cost inflation, we have already begun taking action to position our aerospace and automation businesses to return to underlying margin expansion in 2026. As we prepare Aerospace to begin its journey as a leading independent company next year, we expect to begin 2026 operating under a new structure that aligns to how we will deliver the future of automation, giving us a running start post separation. Increasingly, customers across end markets face similar structural challenges such as skilled labor shortages, aging infrastructure, operational inefficiencies, and elevated energy and maintenance costs. As value creation shifts towards harnessing the power of data to solve enterprise-scale challenges and achieve new levels of transformation, we are streamlining our business units centered around cohesive business models for addressing these issues. This segment realignment exemplifies our effort to simplify our whole organization to focus on actions that create the highest value for our stakeholders. Reducing distraction from legacy liabilities, reviewing strategic alternatives for parts of our portfolio that do not fit our business model, and acquiring complementary technology through bolt-on and tuck-in acquisitions all demonstrate our commitment to optimizing our business for future growth and value creation. And finally, Quantinuum's recent capital raise and technological leap forward, delivering the promise of quantum computing, which the company will demonstrate in coming weeks, move Honeywell closer to realizing the value of its pioneering investment in this space. With that, Sean, let's take questions.

Thank you, Vimal. Vimal and Mike are now available to answer your questions. We ask that you please be mindful of others in the queue by asking only one question and one related follow-up. Operator, please open the line for Q&A.

Our first question comes from Nigel Coe with Wolfe Research.

Just wanted to maybe kick off with the 4Q margin for ESS. And I'm just doing the quick math here, it implies 3 to 4 points of decline year-over-year. So I just want to make sure, number one, that math is correct. And secondly, is the Advanced Materials Solstice spin losing 2 months of that? Is that having a material impact on that year-over-year?

So I would first highlight that within the ESS, we see LNG doing extremely well in that business. So that we see really good project activity, and that's progressing well. Orders are up. What do we see in the fourth quarter, we see a little bit of transitory, I would say, softness in margins, and that's predominantly driven by mix. So we see catalyst pushouts continuing. It's affecting us in the fourth quarter. But generally, I would say that ESS will normalize as we progress through 2026, back to its historical margins. And then on Advanced Materials. Advanced Materials was a little bit, I would say, accretive to the overall portfolio, but we're working for that as we are setting up for 2026.

And Nigel, this is Sean. I'll just remind you that the ESS business in Europe, in particular, typically has a seasonal build and both volume and mix favorability from 1Q to 4Q. If you recall, we had an unusually strong second quarter, which we called out at the time. And so really that full year fourth quarter impact is not that severe. It's really just a timing factor of where things came in at second quarter versus traditionally being higher in Q3 and Q4. And so I emphasize just the timing is more of a factor than anything else.

Okay, that's my follow-up question. First, did we experience these pressures in the third quarter and could the government settlements have offset that? I'm curious if you can provide some quantification on that. Also, do you anticipate this shift in mix occurring in the latter part of the first half of next year? Or do you have any visibility on that at this stage?

So like I said, I think from the order activity standpoint, the order activity on big new projects is quite strong, and we'll continue to see that in the fourth quarter. From a revenue conversion standpoint, given these are big capital projects, they start converting to revenue probably in the second and third quarter and then the second half. From a catalyst standpoint, based on how customers order and ordering pattern, we see that improving next year as well, but don't see that volume in the fourth quarter. And like Sean said, we usually see fourth quarter seasonality in the business, and we didn't see it this year because a lot of that volume came to us in the second quarter. So there will be a little bit of a gap in the fourth quarter as far as ESS margins.

But all things said, Nigel, we expect ESS margin to expand in 2026. It's a transitionary thing. At the end of the day, we are positioning the business for growth. The LNG segment is doing extremely well. Sundyne is doing extremely well. The overall projects, as Mike mentioned, are performing at an order rate of 8% growth in Q3. We expect solid Q4. So it's just really a transitionary effect on the catalyst volume. And we think that will adjust in 2026 and we should have a more year more on expected lines, we're expanding our margins in 2026.

Our next question comes from the line of Julian Mitchell with Barclays.

Just wanted to start with the IA segment as it seems there's a lot of different moving parts inside it. You flipped to organic growth in Q3, I think, for the first time in a couple of years, but it sounds like that will reverse in the fourth quarter. So just trying to understand, is that a function of something moving the wrong way again in short cycle lower? Or is it more a function of the large project delays in the longer cycle business? And trying to understand on margins, I think there was a comment on similar margin in Q4. So does that mean it's a 19%-ish margin? And are there any one-time kind of headwinds on that as we're thinking about next year?

Yes. From the IA perspective, the orders appeared to be strong in Q3. However, we have significant timing variability with larger orders, particularly in our warehouse automation business, which we are closely monitoring. Overall, compared to the beginning of the year, we have a more positive outlook on the business and its progress. Regarding margins, I expect them to grow sequentially in the fourth quarter for IA. There aren’t any major one-time costs, and the team is set to enhance margins by 2026. We have good visibility for margin growth in IA through 2026. The backlog is improving, providing us with good leverage concerning fixed costs, and we have strong visibility on pricing.

That's helpful. And then just my quick follow-up on the Aerospace division. Maybe give us some update on where we stand on that destocking? Do you think it's largely behind you now on the commercial aero side? And should we assume that, that 26% margin rate, again, that's a good placeholder into next year, barring violent swings in mix?

Sure. So super happy with how the Aero team performed in the third quarter, and I think you will see more good news from Aero team as we go to fourth quarter and next year. I would say, from a margin standpoint, Q2 '25 was probably the bottom, and you should continue to see sequential improvements on margins going to 2026. And on recoupling, I think that's largely behind us. I think commercial, we will sequentially improve growth rates in the fourth quarter as well. And we should have a good print on Aero in Q4 and going into 2026. The setup looks really good. Orders, again, were extremely high, high double digits. And our past due backlog, even with us outputting at these rates, continues to hang over $2 billion. So we still have a lot, I would say, to work with going to 2026.

Our next question comes from the line of Steve Tusa with JPMorgan.

Can you discuss the trend in the BA margin? It has been quite strong over the past few quarters, although it seems slightly weaker this quarter than we anticipated. What are the factors contributing to this, and what is your outlook as we move into 2026?

I am very pleased with the performance of the BA team, and as we've discussed before, there is still significant potential for growth. Regarding the third quarter, it's primarily about the mix of projects and products, and I wouldn't say there's anything to worry about. I expect BA to continue to improve margins sequentially, and they have a strong plan in place for 2026 to keep expanding those margins, so I have no concerns about that part of the business.

I was going to reinforce that the BA just reinforces the overarching Honeywell strategy on how we are pivoting our business through higher growth and margin expansion. So they are ahead of the curve on executing that, and I'm very confident that other businesses are going to demonstrate the same. So we do expect 2026 to follow the trend line you have observed in BA in 2025.

Lastly, regarding the income statement, with Solstice coming up and the changes you've made to the liabilities, do you have any thoughts on adjusting the pension accounting and its reflection in your income statement? Could this change occur before the aerospace division or would that trigger a reevaluation of the earnings format?

So it's definitely on one of our agenda items as we go over into 2026. We're actively discussing it. We understand your concern and your thoughts on pension treatment. I would say, just based on what you see, we'll continue to simplify our balance sheet and how we report earnings to make sure you have a better visibility to cash flow conversion and EPS. So it's definitely on our agenda, but we're not ready to speak about it today.

Our next question comes from the line of Scott Davis with Melius Research.

I know this can be a little bit variable, but I can't recall a quarter with 22% order growth. You provided some details per segment, but were there any specific projects or significant factors that contributed to that growth, or was it more widespread as suggested in your slides?

It's more across the board, Scott. I mean I think Aero continues to do extremely well, and they're maintaining their momentum of continuing to increase their win rates and backlog. We had strong orders growth in building automation, which flows a lot of that into the revenue stream, which you have seen. ESS orders growth were very good and also in IA. So I would say that the order growth is across all segments. Long cycle, even stronger than short cycle, but short cycle is also growing. And I do expect the trend to continue in Q4. We don't expect any substantial change in the trajectory. And that's the foundation of the growth-oriented Honeywell we have been focusing on over the last two years. The effort we have put in, in terms of our portfolio revitalization and focusing on the R&D spend on the right set of projects, you can see the early effect of that, and I'm confident that things will get better as we go along into 2026.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just switching gears slightly. You guys have done six pretty meaningful deals in the last two years. And I think you previously said that was kind of 1% to 2% tailwind accretion in '25, I believe, somewhere in that ballpark. How does that flow through on '26 given what you're seeing in the deal models? And it sounds like you're a little ahead of the deal models on that group of transactions overall.

Overall, I would say the M&A deals are performing very well. On average, since I started, our deals are at a 12x multiple, and we are either on track or ahead of expectations in the majority of them. The foundational strategy we established to enhance our organic growth rates and margin expansion is really working effectively for us. I'm feeling very optimistic. Mike, would you like to provide some specific feedback on this?

Sure. So like Vimal said, I think the majority of these deals starting actually in the fourth quarter and going into next year is becoming organic for us from a growth standpoint. And like Vimal said, they continue to be accretive and TBAs are ahead of plan, both on revenue synergies and on cost synergies. So we feel really good about these acquisitions and how they fit the portfolio, not only financially, but also from a technology complementary standpoint.

Our next question comes from the line of Amit Mehrotra with UBS.

Vimal, I wanted to ask if you can just talk about the pricing strategy across the organization. You made a comment recently around pricing vis-a-vis wanting to preserve or protect volume. I forgot the exact wording, but it was something to that effect. And the question is really in the context of if I look this year, revenue expectations are increasing, margin expectations are coming down a little bit. Fully understand there's mix, there's acquisition, there's timing. But just wanted to understand if there's maybe a pricing opportunity in the future that is not being exploited today, either because of the R&D investments you're making or maybe just a more surgical focus on that post the spin-off of the businesses.

So thanks, Amit. I would say that fundamentally, our strategy has been that we want to preserve our margins while we keep our volumes to our expectations. So that has been the North Star we have been focusing on, and we have demonstrated that for the most part. I would say that if I look ahead in 2026, pricing will become a good enabler for 2026 margin expansion. The only headwind we faced in pricing, I'll call out in 2025 was just a lag effect. It's just the timing. We're learning something and we can lag 30 days, 45 days. We are not going to face that event in 2026. So overall, I do remain confident that our model of getting our margin expansion through pricing while we're protecting our volume is really working. And some of the margin expansion we have seen in this year, the margins have been more flattish. It's primarily our focus has been growth. And there are some transitionary issues which have happened at this point, whether it is tariff-related cost hitting us in some pockets and M&A impact, et cetera. I'm very confident those are transitionary. And we're going to see a strong impact in our margin expansion into 2026. Mike, anything to add?

That's exactly right. I mean we've been now with the teams focusing on 2026 pricing for about 1.5 months. We have a really good plan and strategy laid out across our segments and regionally. And based on everything I see, pricing will become stronger next year. And a lot of that is really driven just by tariffs stabilizing and that picture on inflation being much more clear. So the teams know what they need to deploy, et cetera. And then I would say if you just look at segments, Aero was behind on price this year. It's going to be a tailwind for them next year. And other than that, I think teams are generally caught up at this stage on pricing going to next year. So I'm really positive on price being better incrementally next year versus this year.

Okay. That's very encouraging. And just one follow-up related to that, just on margins. You're very clear about the trajectory for margin in Aero next year. If I look at all the different pieces, they're all kind of converging Industrial Automation kind of sticks out a little bit in terms of structurally lower margins in building automation and Aero. I think, Vimal, you've talked about maybe some self-help opportunity there, but maybe kind of talk about a little bit of the Industrial Automation margin opportunity from kind of the high teens, where you see that maybe structurally the opportunity for that?

I view margin expansion in Industrial Automation in a traditional sense. As announced recently, our focus will shift primarily to the product businesses within Industrial Automation, with a reform of the Process Automation and Technology segment. This positions us very well. The simplification in Industrial Automation enables us to concentrate on executing effectively within the classic product business model in Building Automation, applying that strategy in Industrial Automation. I anticipate that pricing will play a role, as we've discussed earlier. On the productivity front, we expect a positive impact on both fixed and variable costs. Regarding variable costs, we are confident about direct materials. For fixed costs, we are aligning our cost structure with the volumes we are currently experiencing, and we feel positive about our position today. Overall, the outlook for Industrial Automation is promising. My main focus is on enhancing the business's growth momentum compared to our current performance. When the timing is right, we will also explore potential M&A opportunities that could strengthen our portfolio.

Our next question comes from the line of Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies.

Maybe first question on Aerospace. And I realize some of it will fall in the next leadership team, which you'll announce later this year. How are you thinking about the biggest opportunities and the implications for margins as we think about '25 being a transitory year with some headwinds and just the evolution of OE mix next year?

Sheila, I would say the transition which is occurring, we spoke about that in the last quarter, too. We definitely see the OE mix becoming less intense compared to how we started the year. So that is certainly a benefit to us. The tariff-related pressure, which came into the cost under the margin rates of Aero would be less of a factor in 2026. And then the CAES acquisition, which was acting as a headwind for our margins in 2025, would not be a factor. In fact, it will be a tailwind. So as I look ahead, all these factors, the confidence that we bottomed out in 25% margins in quarter two, and then we are lapping towards 26% and higher. That direction is very clear, and we are working hard to demonstrate towards that and better in '26 and beyond.

Great. And then maybe if I could follow up on the aftermarket, just nice acceleration there. And you called out, I think, some moderation in Q4. What kind of surprised to the upside in the quarter on the commercial aftermarket? Was it commercial aviation, business aviation, was it recurring revenue? If you could just talk about that.

I would say that in the aftermarket, the growth is quite widespread. A lot of this growth is supported by stable demand, and it is also driven by our improvements in the supply chain. I hope this trend continues. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, I expect this business to grow high single digits on a normalized basis. Demand remains strong across the industry, with no specific drivers other than the supply chain performing significantly better than it did in the second quarter.

Our next question comes from the line of Deane Dray with RBC Capital Markets.

First, I'd just like to say congrats to the team on getting Solstice to the finish line or the starting line, depending on your perspective. We've seen multiple spins by companies, and we know all the work that goes into it. So congrats.

I appreciate the good word there, Deane. And the teams have worked really, really hard to get it done ahead of time. Our earlier estimate was Q1 '26, and we pulled it forward by at least one quarter.

Great. And then I missed the very beginning. Did you have any update on the process of looking at strategic alternatives for productivity solutions and services and warehouse automation? Any update on potential timing?

We have started the strategic review process. During the earnings call for the first quarter of 2026, we should be able to provide a clearer path forward. The work is ongoing, but I don’t have any further details to share right now. We expect to have more information for you in about 90 days when we return.

Got it. And then on Industrial Automation and your comment that's more of a product focus, it was interesting to see the call out about sensors being in their fourth quarter of growth, and you called out health care sensors in particular. So we're now getting some additional insight into these businesses. Can you comment on the growth opportunity in the sensor business?

Yes. So if you look at our Industrial Automation look ahead, depending on what decision we make on our scanning and mobility business and warehouse automation business, the balance IA would be a product-oriented business where products are critical. These are related to compliance. These products are certified. And that's a fundamental model we're really working towards. And we also are conscious that IA will also become a pivot towards our U.S. onshoring growth. So all those items are in play as we are thinking ahead about the IA portfolio moving forward. Now sensors is one of the biggest businesses there. We have positioned in three verticals in sensors: aerospace, medical devices, and industrial. And we have good run-up to this business in 2025. We expect to maintain that momentum in 2026. And we expect to provide more segment-specific details in IA as we have simplified the segment. And as we have more conversations and discussions in the future, I look forward to providing you more details. But fundamentally, sensors is one of the key parts of the business, and we remain very optimistic on how this will perform in the times ahead.

Our next question comes from the line of Chris Snyder with Morgan Stanley.

I wanted to follow up on the Industrial Automation portfolio, specifically regarding the realignment Slide from 15. It seems like the only full business line being included in the new Industrial Automation segment is the sensing business, assuming warehouse and PSS are divested. Can you provide insight on how much revenue might be shifting from the process solutions bucket to the new Industrial Automation portfolio? Additionally, what is your perspective on the scale of the Industrial Automation business? Is this an area where you might consider adding assets?

Yes. We provided an overview yesterday that reflects two years of our simplification efforts. Our work on the portfolio, including our spin-offs and strategic reviews, has led us to define three end markets or verticals. We are satisfied with our current position in buildings, process, and industrial sectors. Currently, buildings and process sectors have a greater scale than industrial. However, we are beginning to build a product-oriented business in the industrial sector and anticipate identifying further opportunities for strengthening it. We still need to complete the strategic review of scanning and mobility, as well as warehouse automation. We are also aiming for organic growth in industrial automation to reach its baseline, and I believe we will see positive developments by 2026. After that, we will evaluate what additional assets we may need to incorporate into our portfolio to enhance Honeywell's overall offering.

I really appreciate that. I guess maybe to follow up on Building Automation. And specifically, could you provide any color or comments on the data center exposure or opportunity there? I mean our channel checks, we're hearing more and more about controls needing to be more complex as the facilities get bigger and more complex. I think historically, that has not been a big vertical for you guys, but it seems like you've done a better job breaking in there over the last year. So can you maybe talk about how you broke in and what is the opportunity?

Yes. Data centers are increasingly becoming a significant part of our building automation business and are contributing to our growth rate. We have a strong position in safety and security within data centers. While the spending in this area is relatively small, approximately 2% of data center budgets, we have a solid foothold in our fire safety and security systems. We are also making progress in building management and are actively working to gain more market share. Many hyperscalers and real estate investment trusts are now our customers. Recently, we announced a partnership with LS ELECTRIC to develop joint solutions that integrate electrical and control systems, responding to customer needs. We are continuously refining our strategy and portfolio. I am confident that the growth in the data center market will provide an additional avenue for our building automation business to maintain its growth momentum. Although we started from a low position, we are gaining momentum in this sector.

Our next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie with Goldman Sachs.

So look, Vimal, you've done a lot from a portfolio perspective. A lot has been announced. I like this new structure. I think it very neatly separates the different businesses. I guess the question is, as we head into the Aero spin in the second half of '26, could you potentially see additional announcements on the portfolio?

I would say that, as we mentioned a few months back that based on the current portfolio assessment, actions we have done, they are completed. But in a company of our size, you never say you're done. I think the portfolio revitalization is a continued activity. So I do expect us to do more additions, which are bolt-on to our portfolio, which fits into the core of buildings, process, and industrial. And if your question is, is there any more exit plan, we feel good about the portfolio of what we have at the position we are today. These are all mission-critical parts of automation. They drive very similar common outcomes like safety, operational excellence, reliability and they really help us to gain a lot of mining installed base through our Forge platform. So that commonality we have achieved with a lot of effort. And I don't see that there will be any material changes we want to make on what we own, but certainly like to consider adding more on a bolt-on basis or maybe tuck-in sometimes as we finish our spins, and we'll continue to report to you if we make any progress on that.

Our next question comes from the line of Andy Kaplowitz with Citigroup.

Vimal, maybe just back to the macro. Can you talk about the cadence of orders and revenue in Q3? Did you see any changes in your short-cycle businesses as the quarter shook out here into Q4? And are there any particular trends you're seeing by region? I think you mentioned some recovery is continuing in at least BA in Europe and China, but what are you seeing overall for Honeywell?

I would say the most significant change I've noticed is that we are experiencing growth across all regions. This hasn’t happened in a while. We have solid growth in the U.S., while Europe is showing low single-digit to mid-single-digit growth depending on the business. Europe is returning to reasonable growth. The Middle East and India consistently perform well for Honeywell. China is relatively flat for Honeywell, excluding Aero, but when including Aero, we are seeing high single-digit growth. This is a notable aspect of what we are witnessing. The diversity of our portfolio across various end markets is certainly beneficial. Our emphasis on growth, new product development, and leveraging our installed base are all strategies that are coming together. I also expect a strong Q4 for orders as well. This isn’t just a one-time occurrence; we anticipate maintaining this momentum for the remainder of the year.

That's helpful. And I know you mentioned lower energy prices have continued to lead to some delays in HPS and UOP. But as you just said, improved orders, does it give you more confidence that these businesses are going to turn higher in '26? And maybe what are your customers telling you about their CapEx expectations for '26?

I mean if you look at our ESS business, the positives are strong demand in LNG and gas. We certainly have a lot of demand and order strength in those. We also see investments made by our customers for more localization of refining and petrochemical capacity. So we see investments made across in India and parts of Africa, parts of the Middle East. So those continue there. The only lack of momentum we have seen, which we discussed before, was catalyst demand. I think it's partly impacted by the oil price, partly impacted by some overcapacity. And we do expect things to settle as the year progresses in 2026. So long-cycle demand is strong. That is evident in our orders rate of ESS. I think short-cycle demand is more flattish, but we do expect it to recover during the course of 2026.

Melissa, we'll take one last question.

Our final question comes from the line of Nicole DeBlase with Deutsche Bank.

I guess I'll just ask one since we're running over time. I'm curious how short-cycle industrial trends kind of shaped up throughout the quarter. Did things kind of remain stable versus how you exited 2Q? Or any notable trends that you would highlight?

Short-cycle trends were actually better in Q3 compared to Q4, and we expect similar trends moving forward. As mentioned in our guidance, we do not anticipate any significant change from one quarter to the next. However, we maintain a cautious approach in our guidance because there are uncertainties we cannot predict. An overarching theme is that the dynamics in the end markets that Honeywell serves remain consistent between Q3 and Q4.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the floor back to Mr. Kapur for any final comments.

Thank you, operator. As always, I would like to express my gratitude to our shareholders, our customers, and all the Honeywell Future Shapers across the world, driving our stellar results in the quarter. And our path ahead is promising, and we look forward to sharing more with everyone in the quarters to come. Thank you all for listening, and please stay safe and healthy.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.