Good day. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Intel Corp.’s First Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker, Head of Investor Relations, Tony Balow. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator. Welcome everyone to Intel’s first quarter earnings conference call. By now you should have received a copy of our earnings release and the earnings presentation. If you have not received both documents, they are available on our Investor website. The earnings presentation is also available in the webcast window for those joining us online. I am joined today by our CEO, Pat Gelsinger; and our CFO, George Davis. In a moment, we will hear brief remarks from both followed by Q&A. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that today’s discussion contains forward-looking statements based on the environment as we currently see it, and as such, does include risks and uncertainties. Please refer to our press release for more information on the specific risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. Today we provided both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. We will be speaking to the non-GAAP financial measures when describing our consolidated results. As a reminder, our non-GAAP results exclude our NAND memory business, which is subject to a pending divestiture, and our non-GAAP year-over-year comparisons also exclude NAND from 2020 results. The earnings presentation and earnings release available on intc.com include the full GAAP and non-GAAP reconciliations. With that, let me hand it over to Pat.

Thank you, Tony. Good afternoon, everyone. It’s a pleasure to be with you for my first earnings call. I consider it an honor to be CEO of this great company. Thanks for joining today. Intel delivered a strong Q1 that beat our January guidance on both the top and bottom line driven by exceptional demand for our products and exemplary execution by our team. We shipped a record volume of notebook CPUs. We launched new competitive Intel Core and Xeon processors. Mobileye had its best quarter ever. With tremendous industry support, we unveiled our IDM 2.0 strategy, setting a bold new course for technology leadership at Intel. The response from employees, partners, and customers has been incredible. Our teams are reinvigorated, innovating, and executing. It’s amazing to be back at Intel, and Intel is back. Before George takes you through the financial details of the quarter, I will begin with the industry trends we are seeing and why Intel is well positioned to aggressively capitalize on them. Said simply, Intel is the only company with the depth and breadth of software, silicon, platforms, and packaging and process with at-scale manufacturing that customers can depend on for their next-generation innovations. There are four superpowers driving digital transformation: cloud, connectivity, artificial intelligence, and the intelligent edge. Intel’s mission, and we are uniquely positioned to do so, is to help customers harness these superpowers to improve the lives of every human on the planet. The digitization of everything was remarkably accelerated by COVID and has spurred innovation and new models of working, learning, interacting, and care. Technology is increasingly central to every aspect of human existence, and semiconductors are the foundation. This is creating a cycle of explosive growth in semiconductors that will result in sustained growth for a decade or more. The PC ecosystem, in particular, is experiencing resurgence. This remote work and learning dynamic of COVID led to more PC shipments in 2020 than at any point since 2012, and that’s continuing. 2021 is shaping up to be the largest PC market ever. In fact, we shipped more notebook CPUs in Q1 than in any other quarter in our history. Total platform unit volumes were up well over 30% in the first quarter. In many markets, one PC in every home is no longer enough. The number of PCs per household, what we call PC density, is increasing. We are seeing strong growth in education, where on a global basis, the number of PCs per hundred students and teachers still remains in the single digits. Every student needs a laptop. We have a long way to go. Additionally, there are over 400 million PCs running Windows 10 that are over four years old today, which is an enormous PC refresh opportunity. Intel is leading this rejuvenation of the PC with marketing, user experience, and purpose-built innovation at the software, silicon, and platform level. We shipped Tiger Lake H for notebooks and Rocket Lake for desktops, and customer reception has been enthusiastic. As a sign of our improving execution, we qualified Tiger Lake H ahead of schedule in 10-nanometers, and we expect 10-nanometer unit volumes to cross over 14-nanometers in the second half of the year. Our Intel Evo platform gives buyers the very best mobile experience, and we are deepening our ecosystem engagement with partners including Microsoft, Google, and Samsung to advance the PC experience in new innovative ways. We see no signs of PC demand slowing and believe the industry will return to shipping more than a million units a day. With over 100 million Xeon servers in the install base, the world runs on Intel. Building on that foundation, we recently launched our most advanced high-performance data center platform optimized to power the industry’s broadest range of workloads from the cloud to the network to the intelligent edge. At the heart of this is our new 3rd-gen Intel Xeon Scalable processor code named Ice Lake, which offers nearly 50% generation-over-generation performance improvements across a range of workloads. We are already shipping Ice Lake to more than 30 customers, including major cloud providers, communication service providers, enterprise, and HPC customers. Another trend driving demand for more optimized computing performance is the infusion of artificial intelligence and machine learning into nearly every application. As the only x86 Data Center CPU with built-in AI acceleration, Ice Lake provides 74% generation-over-generation improvement on AI workloads, and our Habana discrete solutions address the needs of those customers with extreme AI demands in areas like training. Sometimes customers want both. For example, UC San Diego will use Intel Xeon and Habana AI accelerators to power their new Voyager supercomputer. Mobileye set a new quarterly record. Mobileye’s assisted driving technology continues to win over automakers with eight new design wins in Q1. We have programs with 13 of the 15 top automotive OEMs. Mobileye continues to open new categories such as delivery transport with a win at Udelv and is rapidly evolving to power L4 fully autonomous robotaxis beginning next year. We continue to have extraordinary success winning in the next-generation 5G environments. A great example from this quarter is our collaboration with Google Cloud to develop solutions that help communication service providers accelerate 5G deployment across multiple network and edge locations. We are already seeing significant adoption of oneAPI and oneAPI power tool kits for high-performance computing, AI, and data analytics. Developers and customers are embracing oneAPI’s open standard space approach for unified programming across architectures and vendors. This includes leading cloud service providers who are embracing oneAPI at scale. The unprecedented demand for semiconductors has stressed supply chains across the industry. We have doubled our internal wafer capacity over the last few years, but the industry is now challenged by a shortage of foundry capacity, substrates, and components. We expect it will take a couple of years for the ecosystem to make the significant investments to address these shortages. This fundamental industry challenge underscores the importance of our unique and differentiated IDM 2.0 strategy. IDM 2.0 utilizes our internal factory network to reliably deliver leadership products and provide the industry another source of foundry capacity through our new Intel foundry services. Leveraging our IDM advantage, we are working aggressively across our global supply chain to solve substrate shortages to satisfy our customers' surging demand and gain market share. By partnering closely with our suppliers, we are creatively utilizing our internal assembly factory network to remove a major constraint in our substrate supply. Coming online in Q2, this capability will increase the availability of millions of units in 2021. It’s a great example of how the IDM model gives us the flexibility to address the dynamic market. It’s clear the industry, and Intel will need more capacity to meet strong future demand, which is why we are dramatically expanding our foundry capability with Intel Foundry Services, starting with a $20 billion investment for our first large-scale foundry operations in Arizona. We plan to expand other locations and establish Intel Foundry Services as a major provider of committed foundry capacity in the U.S. and Europe while ensuring a sustainable and secure semiconductor supply for the world. Since its announcement, the industry response to Intel Foundry Services has already been incredible. We are engaged with well over 50 potential customers today. We are seeing excitement from some of the top technology giants in the world across industry verticals ranging from automotive to high-performance compute and cloud service providers. We have been responding to and proactively engaging with automotive component suppliers on how we can help them with their supply chains and alleviate shortages in both the near and long term. We are doing our part to address this global supply crisis, but we cannot do it alone. The investment needed at the scale required is immense, and it will require close industry and government partnership to address this need. Governments around the world are recognizing the critical nature of semiconductors and the need to increase advanced chip manufacturing capacity and prepare for the future. We are encouraged by President Biden’s recognition of semiconductor manufacturing as a critical component of our national infrastructure and its inclusion along with key research and infrastructure investments in broadband in the American Jobs Plan. Looking ahead, we are confident our strategy will drive innovation and technology leadership for Intel. 7-nanometers is progressing well, and IDM 2.0 puts us on a path to restore process performance leadership and build on our industry-leading packaging technologies. With IDM 2.0, we will have superior capacity and supply resilience by leveraging our internal and external capacity and a superior cost structure. By accelerating our clock rate of innovation, we will deliver leadership products in every category. In the PC business, we will follow the successful launches of Tiger Lake and Rocket Lake with Alder Lake, which is currently sampling and will ship in the second half of this year. Within the next couple of weeks, we will tape in the compute tile for Meteor Lake, our first 7-nanometer CPU for 2023. In the data center, we will follow the strong ramp of Ice Lake with Sapphire Rapids, which is scheduled to reach production around the end of this year and ramp in the first half of 2022. Overall, our 2023 roadmaps are firm and under execution, and our 2024 and 2025 plans are well underway to provide unquestioned leadership products in every category we participate in. The Intel innovation machine is fired up. Before I pass it to George for the details of the quarter, let me reiterate how excited I am to be back. You can feel the energy inside of Intel, the passion to innovate, and the drive that made us great. We are reigniting our culture to attract, retain, and motivate the best and brightest engineers in the industry. In fact, we have onboarded over 2,000 engineers so far this year, including the recent key hire of Sanjay Natarajan, who will co-lead our logic technology development. In total, we expect to add several thousand more engineers by the end of the year. 2021 is a pivotal year as we lay the foundation of our winning IDM 2.0 strategy and invest in our future to accelerate our trajectory and execution. Given the incredible demand for computing, the strength of our IDM 2.0 strategy, and the technology investments we are making, I am certain Intel’s best days are in front of us.

Thanks, Pat, and good afternoon, everyone. Q1 marked a stronger-than-expected start to the year, with both our PC notebook and Mobileye businesses achieving record quarters. Our revenue was $18.6 billion, exceeding our guidance by $1.1 billion led by strength in our PC business and the first signs of recovery in the enterprise and government portion of our data center business. Our IoTG, Mobileye, and PSG businesses also posted strong sequential growth as they began to emerge from an adverse macroeconomic environment driven by COVID. As noted in our January guidance, Q1 revenue includes an approximately $580 million one-time corporate revenue item. Gross margin for the quarter was 58.4%, exceeding guidance by approximately 40 basis points largely due to flow-through on higher revenue. Q1 EPS was $1.39, up $0.29 versus guidance, with the majority of the beat attributed to strong operational performance and the balance on gains related to our ICAP portfolio. Note that these non-GAAP results exclude the impact of a charge related to VLSI litigation that is included in GAAP results. In Q1, we generated $5.5 billion of cash from operations and free cash flow of $1.6 billion. We repurchased $2.4 billion of shares, completing the $20 billion repurchase plan announced in October of 2019. Going forward, we expect to have lower stock repurchases as we enter an investment phase to support strong demand growth in the client segment, build initial infrastructure for future foundry volumes, and make necessary investments to accelerate our return to process leadership. We remain committed to growing the dividend. Moving to segment performance in the quarter, CCG revenue was up 8% year-over-year, driven by all-time record notebook unit volumes, up 54% year-over-year. Increased volume in the consumer entry and education segments resulted in platform ASPs being down 20% year-over-year. Excluding this upside volume, ASPs were flat year-over-year. Combined with growth in our Wi-Fi and Thunderbolt connectivity businesses, revenue grew overall in CCG despite the ramp-down of our modem and Mac sales, and the impact of exiting our connected home division. Operating income was $4.1 billion, down 2% year-over-year on higher 10-nanometer mix and increased R&D investment. DCG delivered revenue of $5.6 billion, somewhat above our expectations, but down 20% year-over-year on a challenging compare. Enterprise and government saw initial recovery with sequential performance above seasonal expectations, while cloud inventory digestion persisted through the quarter as expected. Strong network SoC growth and product mix drove more than half of the 14% year-over-year ASP decline. DCG operating income in Q1 was down $2.2 billion year-over-year on lower revenue, transition to 10-nanometer, and increased R&D investment in our Xeon roadmap. Our Intelligent Edge businesses were up year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter as COVID-related demand impacts began to subside. Specifically, IoTG revenue was up 18% quarter-over-quarter with strength in retail and industrial segments. Mobileye revenue and operating margin were both all-time records at $377 million and $147 million, respectively. Mobileye continues to execute well and gain market segment share as the auto industry recovers from pandemic lows. DSG revenue was up 15% quarter-over-quarter with strength in its communications and embedded segments. Moving to our Q2 and full year outlook. For Q2, we are guiding revenue of $17.8 billion, down 2% year-over-year excluding our NAND business. We continue to see very strong demand for PCs, with fulfillment challenges on industry-wide component and substrate shortages. In data center, we believe revenue bottomed in Q1 and will increase in Q2 as cloud digestion impacts begin to subside, and enterprise and government momentum continues. Gross margin is expected to be approximately 57%, up approximately 1 point year-over-year, driven by lower inventory reserves and improved 10-nanometer costs, partially offset by factory start-up costs. We are forecasting EPS of $1.05 per share and a tax rate of 13%. For the full year, we are increasing our guidance provided in March, now forecasting $72.5 billion in revenue, up $500 million from our prior guidance, gross margin of 56.5%, and EPS at $4.60, up $0.05 from our March 23 call. We now expect free cash flow to be $10.5 billion, up $500 million versus prior expectations. We continue to see very strong PC demand with both TAM and our internal PC supply growing double digits year-over-year, but we expect CCG revenue to be more first-half-weighted than normal seasonality due to industry-wide supply constraints and the continuing ramp-down of modem and Apple Mac revenue. In data center, we expect increased demand in the second half as both cloud, enterprise, and government segments return to growth. Gross margin percentage will be lower in the second half of the year, predominantly due to increased 7-nanometer start-up costs and industry-wide supply constraints impacting client volume and mix. We expect increased R&D throughout the year as we invest in our roadmap and IDM 2.0 strategy. As stated in March, this guidance is tempered by DCG-related entity list uncertainty and industry-wide supply constraints, primarily impacting our client, IoTG, and PSG businesses. We are working closely with our supply chain partners and leveraging our unique IDM capabilities to mitigate these supply constraints, gaining market segment share and outperforming this guidance. With that, let me turn it back over to Tony and get to your questions.

All right. Thank you, George. Moving on now to the Q&A. As is our normal practice, we would ask each participant to ask just one question. Operator, please go ahead and introduce the first caller.

Our first question will come from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan. You may begin.

Good afternoon and nice job on the quarterly execution. It was good to see the unveiling of the IDM 2.0 strategy back in March. It was also good to get the 7-nanometer update and continued execution on getting that ramped in 2023. But that’s just a point milestone, right? So in order to sustain your technology and performance leadership with the IDM 2.0 strategy, it’s going to require the means to maintain a cadence on both intranode optimization, but also more importantly to maintain a cadence of continued node strength to 5-nanometer and then ultimately to 3-nanometer. I think the Intel team had previously articulated node migrations kind of every two, two and a half years. Pat, I think you said, a yearly cadence back in March, but I assume that that was internode optimization. But on the move to 7 to 5, can we expect the team to ramp 5-nanometers two, two and a half years after your 7-nanometer ramp and then 3-nanometer ramp two, two and a half years after 5?

Yeah. Thank you for the question, Harlan. Overall, as I said on the call, we are seeing very good progress on the 7-nanometer team. They are executing now. We are very confident with the changes that we made on that and the move to really embrace EUV, and since we have done that, we have just seen superb execution. As I said in the unleashed event, we expect to move to a yearly cadence or better for our process technology, and we are going to be laying that path out very clearly. We are excited about our team’s ability to get us back to process parity and ultimately to sustained leadership yet again. I am very happy with the team and some of the investments we are making. The hiring of Sanjay Natarajan that we talked about, the team is getting fired up to execute on that. We also see this as just one piece of our technology leadership strategy, and as we have seen in the IDM 2.0 strategy, it’s about packaging. It’s about the process. It’s about the full set of IP that we are bringing to the table and at-scale manufacturing. I will say some of the early enthusiasm that we have seen from some of the foundry customer pipeline is really bringing together our packaging technology with the full IDM 2.0 strategy. So overall, getting back to the heart of your question, exactly. We are going to increase the cadence of our process technology innovations. We are seeing very positive signs since we made this change, and we are on track to parity and again sustained leadership out in the future. Our team is firing on all cylinders, and I am excited about what we are seeing as we monitor those milestones very rigorously going forward. This team is on fire, and we are executing.

Great. Thank you.

Operator, next question.

Thank you. Our next question will come from the line of C.J. Muse from Evercore. You may begin.

Yeah. Thank you for taking the question. I guess a follow-on question to your foundry strategy or IDM 2.0 strategy. I get the vision of gaining scale by investing for yourselves at the leading edge and then backfilling fully depreciated capacity in the 22-nanometer and 10-nanometer nodes over time and the benefit to you guys. But what’s the benefit of opening up the business at the leading edge to foundry customers, and how are you going to persuade folks to redesign to your designs? Will you have to subsidize them, or will that be a subsidy that comes from the U.S. Government? I would love to hear your thoughts there. Thank you.

Yeah. Overall, let’s just paint the picture a little bit more broadly, C.J. and thanks for the question. On the IDM 2.0 strategy, we are all about making leading-edge capacity available for our foundry customers. The world needs more leading-edge capacity, and there are very few companies that can supply it around the world. So we are seeing a lot of enthusiasm for that. It’s going to cause us to build and expand our capacity more aggressively. And as you suggest, it also means we have a better monetization on the longer life cycle of the foundry business, and we are planning on getting to foundry margins with that investment. Now, as we have already begun engaging with customers, we have seen enthusiasm, right? We have seen enthusiasm that they get to design on our leading process technology, and they have more choices for where that might be coming from. We are also seeing enthusiasm for this idea that they can bring some of their IP and bring our IP to the table, and in particular, some of the cloud customers have been very excited about that ability to say, hey, I can take some of my cool ideas and be better optimized, including things like x86 cores to have a more optimized solution for their market requirements. This is compelling for them. Then we combine that with all the other strengths that we have talked about such as at-scale manufacturing, and in a supply-constrained environment like we are in right now, boy, that’s bringing enthusiasm from customers. Also, we get to do that with all of the other assets that we have with packaging, our software technology. We think this is a strategy that will be very powerful for the industry, and we have seen that response from early customers, including the EDA tool chains and the IP suppliers. This is really hitting the right time in the industry, and we are seeing the international aspects as well as the government aspect saying, yeah, we need a more geographically distributed resilient supply chain for something that’s critical to the future of humanity and semiconductor technology. This is the right strategy for the right time, and we are seeing great response from it.

Thank you.

Operator, next question.

Our next question comes from the line of Joe Moore from Morgan Stanley. You may begin.

Great. Thank you. I wonder if you can talk about the data center group numbers. I guess both the 20% year-on-year decline in cloud and the 14% decline in platform average selling price. How much of that is just this kind of lingering cloud digestion, and what’s your visibility to that resuming? Is there any competitive aspect you think to the weakness there?

Yeah. I will start on that one and ask George to jump in a little bit. Overall, as George said in his comments, Q1 was a little bit better than we expected for DCG in terms of revenue, and we see it improving as we go through the year. So we saw this at the bottom. A lot of that was driven exactly as you asked in the question by cloud digestion. We had an extraordinary last year. But now customers are almost through the digestion of that, and we are starting to see signs that they want to start the next build phase in their cloud. But we also saw some great successes with the enterprise business starting to pick up, some of the networking business wins were very strong for our 5G area. Overall, we believe we are on a path back to growth. I’d also emphasize that the Ice Lake launch was superb. This product has major gains in generation-to-generation improvement and absolute areas of differentiation like the AI performance. As we said, this is AI-infused now into the 100 million plus Xeon sockets as we are bringing AI into every one of them. This is a powerful new capability and getting great response from our customers overall. So we feel very good about the path that we are on. Our overall outlook for the year is that we are going to continue to see that momentum build as we go through the year and expect to see the business response, the competitive position, and the customers getting on board. It’s an exciting time for our data center business. George, anything you would add?

If you consider the year-over-year impact in the first quarter, a significant portion was due to comparing what we now view as the low point of the digestion phase with an exceptionally strong Q1. Additionally, our investments in this area are increasing. As we make advancements in 7-nanometer technology, we are beginning to see cost efficiencies that were not present last year, which is a positive trend that will improve over time. We have also raised operational expenses to further advance the Xeon roadmap, aligning with some of the initiatives Pat discussed. Moreover, we are beginning the transition to the 10-nanometer generation for servers, which is leading to initial cost impacts. We are already witnessing notable cost improvements in the 10-nanometer segment on the client side, which is benefiting DCG currently, although there is still work to be done as we shift from 14-nanometer to 10-nanometer technology.

Great. And just to make sure, the 14% decline in platform ASP, was that more mix related towards communications, or was there something as well as any decline like-for-like?

You have a significantly higher proportion of SoCs and similar products in the mix. When revenue declines, comparing these mixes becomes more challenging, especially since you are facing a drop in the area with the best margins.

Great. Thank you very much.

Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein. You may begin.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I want to ask that question a little bit more explicitly. So if more than half, about half, or whatever of the ASP decline year-over-year, the 14% in data center was due to SoC mix and product mix, what was the other half coming from? How much of that is direct ASP decline, and what should we expect on that front as we go into the second half? And how does that tie into the implied gross margin guidance in the second half, which is for the company which is down something like 250 bps second half versus first half?

I’d like to clarify that the lower revenue includes both the ASP and volume effects compared to the first quarter of last year, which accounted for over half of it. The rest was divided between the factory start-up costs I mentioned, increased operating expenses as we consider operating margin, and the impact on unit costs due to ramping up 10-nanometer relative to last year. Looking at the second half of the year regarding overall margin, we expect to see some margin effects from the supply situation affecting the mix and volume from clients. Additionally, the start-up costs for 7-nanometer will increase throughout the year, which is likely the next biggest factor, though this could be somewhat balanced by the recovery in the server segment.

Yeah. Overall, Stacy, I’d just add it’s about building leadership products. Ice Lake is a great product and we are seeing a strong ramp for it. As the products get better, ASPs will improve, and we are going to be very aggressive in terms of market share in this area. So we feel like we are now very much on the front foot again in this business and we are starting to see the market respond that way. Some of the things that we have discussed with Ice Lake in particular and our Sapphire Rapids program following up, we are in a good competitive dynamic, and we are leaning into this area of our business and we are seeing great response from our customers.

Can you define what you mean aggressive on market share?

Exactly that. Aggressive on market share, we are going to fight for every socket in the market. This is an area that is core to our business. We are going to be aggressive. We have just delivered a great new product for it. We are going to be using our system design, our validation, our software assets, our customer relationships, our supply chain, everything that we can to bring value to our customers. They are looking for us, building on that 100 million install base of servers that we have now. This is a great business and one that we are going to be very aggressive in bringing the best things to our customers. As you think about this business, this is an area that with our cloud partners, our IDM 2.0 strategy is powerful. Now we are saying to them not only are we going to be building better and better products for you in this area, but we are also going to be co-designing, co-innovating and bringing new capabilities for them to optimize solutions for their markets as well. Yes, we are going to be aggressive in the data center and cloud business going forward.

And John Pitzer from Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Data center…

Your line is open, John.

We can hear you now, John.

Sorry about that. Pat, just sticking on the theme of data center and the cloud business, can you help us understand why you are comfortable that this is digestion and not something more like cloud guys going to more internal solutions or solutions away from Intel? I sort of ask the question because cloud was down about 15% year-over-year in Q4. It’s down about 30% in Q1. I know you have another hard compare year-over-year on Q2, but what gives you confidence that this is digestion and not something more? In George’s prepared comments, he said all of data center would be up sequentially in June. Do you expect that for the cloud portion as well?

At the highest level, I will just say we work intimately with these customers, right? Our people are in their environments, we are working supply chains, we are building forecasts with them, we know what their inventory levels are. These are very intimate relationships. So I’d just say, at that level, we are confident when we speak that what they are doing and what we are going to see in the future and how they are digesting and deploying the products that we delivered to them last year are now ramping in and becoming instances they are selling and services they are selling as well. I will say because of that intimate relationship that we have. We are quite confident in those comments. As we see the sequential growth, we expect that across the business. We see that at networking, we see that at enterprise and government, and we see that at cloud as well. We do see some of the elements that we talked about with respect to some of them exploring some of their own design work, and I will just say with that, we are very close to that. Those are fairly modest overall in terms of their volume so far. And as I mentioned in the last question, this is an area that the IDM 2.0 strategy, the Intel Foundry Services is powerful, and the response that we have seen from those customers saying, wow, now we can co-innovate without doing all the work of creating a new architectural point in the cloud environment, this is powerful and something that we think is uniquely going to help us to navigate them to an answer that is much more favorable for them as well as for us, and we are off to a great start.

Hey, John, one thing I would add is that we are going to see growth in all three of the major areas in data center, but the standout grower in Q2 is going to be cloud.

Perfect. Thank you, guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Ambrish Srivastava from BMO. You may begin.

Yeah. Thank you. Pat and George, I just wanted to come back to the IDM 2.0 strategy. George, you mentioned that clamping down on buyback, which makes sense, so somewhat capital allocation, excuse me. But how should investors be thinking about the impact on P&L as you go through implementing IDM 2.0? And related to that is free cash flow impact as you go through an elevated level of capital spend, and what really are the milestones that investors should be looking for?

Thank you for the question. We will cover many of those details at our Analyst Day, which will focus on future plans. The investment cycles for foundry are lengthy. It takes time to qualify customers, and capacity expansions also require a significant amount of time. To be agile, we are making substantial investments in shelf build-out, with Arizona being a prime example. We have been addressing demand for several years. Our goal is to have more options to respond to the market for both foundry and our core market, which we are currently unable to meet. You can expect us to prioritize building this flexibility. Consequently, capital expenditures will increase, impacting free cash flow. However, we have a solid growth outlook that will aid in boosting cash from operations. Overall, the investment cycle will be logical as we present it. The returns will definitely involve an investment phase for the next two to three years, after which customer demand will begin to balance the investment.

Yeah. I’d just add to that from some of the things building on the unleashed announcement in March. This is a good market, a $100 billion foundry market, a huge emphasis in that for leading-edge capacity which we are uniquely suited to provide. Competitors aren’t able to catch up with demand in this area, and factories take a long time to build. We are clearly, as George has laid out, this is something that the optionality helps our existing business, as well as our foundry business. Finally, the characteristics of the foundry business for somebody like us are good. Not only is it large, but it has good margin characteristics, and we expect that we are going to be able to produce good returns over the long term. As we think about this, again, we go back. The world needs more semiconductor capacity, and it wants a more balanced supply chain. We are seeing industry say that, and governments say that, and we are uniquely positioned to fulfill that.

Thank you.

Our next question is from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America. You may begin.

Thanks for taking my question. I had a question on the roadmap for gross margin both kind of near and longer term. On the near-term, your implied gross margin in the back half are about 55% plus minus. Is this the trough, and is this kind of the starting point for calendar 2022 that we should keep in mind as we start to invest more in 7-nanometer? Then longer term, when I look at your CapEx now, it’s about 25%, 27% of sales, much higher than depreciation. So what is the additional pressure as those things converge? When I look at the foundry business that you are talking about, the best foundry in the world makes 50% gross margin. So how should we think about gross margin both near-term and the longer term? Thank you.

We are unlikely to provide forecasts for 2022 and beyond during this call. We will offer insights into margin expectations at Analyst Day. For the remainder of the year, we are facing a supply-constrained environment, which is affecting our mix, resulting in more small core products being sold instead of our higher average selling price and higher margin items. Additionally, the 7-nanometer start-up is progressing well, demonstrating both process and product readiness for this technology. We anticipate a strong recovery in the server segment, although this is tempered since we are ramping up the 10-nanometer process from a very mature 14-nanometer node, which may not yield the expected gains. I am optimistic about our long-term margin potential. This year, we will not see significant impacts from our IFS activities, although we will be making some investments. These investments are crucial for the next year or two to meet the rising demand we notice in the client sector.

And when do depreciation and CapEx converge, George?

It will really depend on the multi-year capital situation. We will need to wait and discuss that when we are prepared to provide a multi-year overview.

Yeah. I’d just say, this is a pivotal year.

Yeah.

This is where we are building out the IDM 2.0 strategy, we are getting our product roadmap back in shape. Leadership products produce leadership margins, and as we see as we go through the year, we have opportunities for supply. As we drive revenues, if we are overachieving, as George said in his prepared remarks, if we overachieve on supply, we will see revenue and gross margin improvements, and leadership products as we are committing to on our roadmap over time will get us back to leadership margins. Overall, this is pivotal, and we are well underway in making that turn to have, I will say, Intel is back with the kind of products, and the kind of growth that you would expect to see from us.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS. You may begin.

Thanks a lot. George, I had a two-part question. I guess the first thing is the $500 million in prepayments that was corporate related, where was that reported from a segment perspective or was it sort of like sprinkled throughout all the segments? I guess the second part is, just on CapEx, I know you had talked before about some CapEx had pushed from last year into this year. I think it was $1.5 billion or something like that. So I am sort of wondering what the right sort of new normal is as you trajectory into next year. Is it like $20 billion the right number, or is it a little bit less than $20 billion? Thanks.

The $500 million was not distributed; it was recorded under other revenue, all in one category. Regarding capital expenditures, we experienced a delay of roughly eight weeks or more due to the pandemic, which significantly impacted our construction activities. This situation remains challenging. Consequently, the most significant factor we encountered last year was this delay. You could argue that around $1.5 billion to $2.5 billion is primarily just making up for the shortfall from last year, which could be added to our free cash flow estimates for this year and help reduce this year's CapEx requirements. Therefore, I believe that the $20 billion estimate for this year is reasonable, and we will discuss next year's expectations later on.

Thanks, George.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Pierre Ferragu from New Street. You may begin.

Thank you for taking my question. Pat, I want to revisit your comments on the foundry initiative. I see it in two ways: first, offering a foundry service that allows clients to combine their designs with Intel’s intellectual property. The second approach is to position Intel as a mainstream general foundry to compete directly with established players like Samsung and TSMC. These two approaches are quite different. In your discussions so far, how would you characterize the focus on these two strategies? How do you envision the balance between them in your business model?

Yeah. Hey. Thanks for the question, Pierre. I think it’s a good question. To some degree, I’d say we don’t know. We are in this phase where we are beginning to engage with customers. We have a good pipeline of customers that fit in both of those buckets. Definitely some of the cloud customers are particularly interested in where they can comingle or create, I will say, hybrid design, some of their IP with some of our IP. We have a very rich pipeline of customers really across pretty much every segment of the industry, communications providers, auto makers, et cetera, that would fit into the second bucket, where it’s much more about them using us as a world-class foundry for all of their designs. We view this as a very broad set of customers that we are aiming at with a broad set of IP. As we get IP for the Risk 5, the ARM ecosystem, and the x86 ecosystem, our value proposition to customers is across that spectrum where they don’t need to decide ours versus theirs. They get to design with that full spectrum. The other thing I would say, Pierre, is we are also seeing extreme interest in our packaging technologies. Here it might be a tile from Samsung or TSMC being combined with a tile from Intel, right? Those might be on older process technologies, newer process technologies, and taking advantage of our world-class packaging and assembly test technologies. We really see that full spectrum coming to bear, and it really is that combination of world-class foundry, world-class IP, and world-class assembly package and test that we think gives us a unique proposition in the industry, and so far, the enthusiasm is very high for that offering. Yeah. Let me just add to that. I think it’s a great point, George, because every IP that I generate from the industry increases the IP available to my internal design teams. Every piece of IP I develop internally is going to be made available to the industry for their use as well. This becomes a powerful reinforcing cycle. Also, we are being benchmarked against the industry for our process technology as we move to industry standard PBKs. We are seeing strong embrace from the EDA suppliers. We see all of this as it makes our process better. It makes our product better, it increases our efficiency, and takes our clock rate of innovation up with the industry. It’s a powerful strategy.

Makes sense. Thanks, George and Pat.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Chris Danely from Citigroup. You may begin.

Thanks, guys. I always thought I was Jewish. I guess I am Italian now.

Now you can be Catholic.

So it seems like we are in the middle of this never-ending fuselage of ARM products out there both from a merchant and a captive perspective. So, Pat, I’d just appreciate your thoughts on where you see things shaking out on an x86 versus ARM both in the PC and the data center space. Would you guys ever consider maybe licensing the x86 technology to some of your hyperscale customers and having them design their own products with the foundry?

Yes, we have just announced that x86 cores will be available through our foundry services for design purposes. We believe this will significantly change how customers view ARM versus x86. Previously, we didn’t provide enough flexibility for designing with our IP, which hindered unique design efforts. Many were left without a strong x86 option and only had access to our standard products with various features, which didn’t necessarily meet their specific needs, especially in cloud applications. Now we are inviting them to collaborate with us, utilize our leading process and packaging technologies, or even create their own designs in our foundry. This approach is a powerful strategy that we think will positively alter the landscape. Making x86 available in this way taps into a vast ecosystem with trillions of lines of code optimized for x86, which continues to innovate. We are also adding capabilities like integrated AI in our new products, as seen with Ice Lake. These innovations set us apart, and the industry is enthusiastic about our advancements in both standard products and what we’re offering through IDM 2.0.

Great. Thanks.

And our last question will come from the line of Matt Ramsay from Cowen. You may begin.

Thank you very much. Good afternoon, guys. Pat, I wanted to ask a couple of questions on the data center in terms of architecture, and I think on the strategy event, I asked a similar one, and maybe we can dig into it a little bit more here. I know you guys just launched Ice Lake and a lot of new features and capabilities as you lay out, but it is a platform transition from Cascade Lake and then another platform transition on to Sapphire. I just wonder, first, what’s been the feedback from Ice Lake as you guys have sampled it and now launched it in terms of platform compatibility issues that customers might be facing? The second part of the question is, what has been the feedback from customers that you have sampled Sapphire Rapids to particularly around the change from a single die to a tile architecture and what that does to the memory system? Thank you.

I think we could spend an hour on that question. Let me try to be quick here for it. The response from Ice Lake has been very strong. Early ramp is very strong, obviously, with the platform change, that does put a bit more work on the part of the customers, but we have been working through that with them, and we are getting good responses overall. As your question suggests, it would be better if we weren’t bringing a new platform transition with Sapphire Rapids as well. But there are so many good things in that platform that the customers are excited about. New PCI, new DVR, and probably, most significantly is the new CXL launch as part of that. I will tell you opening up that additional interface on the platform has gotten tremendous support from the industry, new capabilities, co-processor capabilities, memory pooling capabilities, has really been maybe the most exciting new platform capability since the PCI gen when we introduced that quite a number of years ago. A lot of excitement about that, and particularly for cloud customers who have seen their memory portion of their TCO cost rise quite rapidly. There’s a lot of enthusiasm in that area of the platform. So I’d say, overall, yeah, we would have probably liked to have less platform transitions in this, but so far the response from customers is they are going through those transitions with us, they are seeing value in those transitions. As we look further out in time, having more platform stability in the architecture, I think, is something that we are striving for. As we get all aspects of our core leadership, our vector AI leadership, process leadership, all of those start to come into play. I think we will see a very nice view of how that platform architecture lays out over time.

Pat, do you have any closing thoughts for the call?

Thank you to everyone for joining my first call back as the CEO of VMware. I want to emphasize that Intel is back. We are performing exceptionally well. Our best days lie ahead. We are making investments for the future, executing effectively, and we are just beginning. I look forward to our next quarterly call with you.

Thanks, Pat. Thank you all for joining today. Operator, could you please close the call.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.