Greetings and welcome to the Nine Energy Service Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. This conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Heather Schmidt, Senior Vice President of Strategic Development and Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Nine Energy Service Earnings Conference Call to discuss our results for the second quarter of 2025. With me today are Ann Fox, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Guy Sirkes, Chief Financial Officer. We appreciate your participation. Some of our comments today may include forward-looking statements reflecting Nine's views about future events. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. We advise listeners to review our earnings release and the risk factors discussed in our filings with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. Our comments today also include non-GAAP financial measures. Additional details and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are also included in our second quarter press release and can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website. I will now turn the call over to Ann.

Thank you, Heather. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss our second quarter results for 2025. Revenue for the quarter was $147.3 million, which was in the upper range of our original guidance of $138 million to $148 million, despite significant rig declines throughout the quarter. We generated adjusted EBITDA of $14.1 million. In April, following the announcement of new tariffs, oil prices declined from an average of approximately $72 in Q1 to an average of approximately $65 in Q2, while also dropping below $60 for the first time in 4 years. With the decline in commodity prices, increased costs due to tariffs and uncertainty around the global economy, U.S. activity and CapEx plans were reduced, resulting in significant rate declines throughout the second quarter. Between March 28 and July 3, 53 rigs came out of the U.S. market, a decline of almost 10% in only 3 months. The majority of these rigs came out of oil-levered basins like the Permian, where Nine has historically generated approximately 40% of our total revenue. With these activity declines, we also began to receive pricing pressure across all of our service lines, most notably in the Permian, which negatively impacted revenue and earnings during the second quarter. Natural gas prices remained mostly supportive during the quarter, but declined from the Q1 average of approximately $4.14 to approximately $3.19 in Q2. We have begun to see a more positive sentiment around natural gas levered basins as well as more consistent, efficient operations, which benefited Nine, most specifically in the Northeast. However, overall rig count in both the Northeast and Haynesville, once again remained relatively flat in Q2 versus Q1. Natural gas continues to be a potential catalyst for Nine, and we remain positive on the medium- and long-term outlook for the commodity and natural gas levered regions. Although activity declined throughout the quarter, our operational team performed well, and we were able to capitalize on an improving natural gas environment as well as continuing to grow our International Tool business. Despite a very challenging macro backdrop, both our Completion Tool and Wireline business grew revenue this quarter. Completion Tool revenue grew by approximately 9% driven in large part by increased sales in the Northeastern Haynesville as well as an increase in International Tool sales. We have talked about our strategy for growing our International Tools market share, and the team has been executing. Our total first half International Tools revenue has increased by approximately 20% when compared to the first half of 2024. This was driven by both increased sales of our multi-cycle barrier valve into the Middle East as well as an overall increase in our plug sales. This will continue to be a focus for the team, and I am optimistic about the potential opportunities for Nine in the international markets. Our Wireline team increased revenue by approximately 11% in Q2. We have strong market share in the Northeast and the team has capitalized on an improving market with both traditional pump down work as well as increasing our market share on the remedial side. During Q2, we saw revenue declines in both Cementing and Coil driven by activity and pricing declines in the Permian Basin, where both operations hold meaningful market share. As a reminder, neither of these service lines operate in the Northeast and therefore did not benefit from any uplift in earnings from the improvement in those basins. I would now like to turn the call over to Guy to walk through detailed financial information.

Thank you, Ann. As of June 30, 2025, Nine's cash and cash equivalents were $14.2 million, with $51.3 million of availability under the revolving credit facility, resulting in a total liquidity position of $65.5 million as of June 30, 2025. On June 30, 2025, the company had $49.4 million of borrowings under the revolving credit facility. In July 2025, the company borrowed an additional $13.4 million under its revolving credit facility, part of which was used for funding of fees related to the closing of our new ABL. During Q2, we did not sell any shares under the ATM program. During the second quarter, revenue totaled $147.3 million with adjusted gross profit of $25.8 million. During the second quarter, we completed 1,061 Cementing jobs, a decrease of approximately 15%. The average blended revenue per job increased by approximately 7%. Cementing revenue for the quarter was $52.2 million, a decrease of approximately 9%. During the second quarter, we completed 8,585 Wireline stages, an increase of approximately 11%. The average blended revenue per stage was flat. Wireline revenue for the quarter was $33 million, an increase of approximately 11%. For Completion Tools, we completed 30,331 stages, an increase of approximately 4%. Completion Tool revenue was $37 million, an increase of approximately 9%. During the second quarter, our Coiled Tubing days were decreased by approximately 23%, with the average blended day rate increasing by approximately 9%. Coiled Tubing revenue was $25.1 million, a decrease of approximately 16%. During the second quarter, the company reported general and administrative expense of $13.9 million. Depreciation and amortization expense was $8.6 million. The company's tax benefit was approximately $0.3 million year-to-date. The benefit for 2025 is the result of a $0.5 million discrete tax benefit recorded during the second quarter of 2025, offset by tax provisions in state and non-U.S. jurisdictions. For the second quarter, the company reported net cash provided by operating activities of $10.1 million. The average DSO for Q3 was 55.9 days. CapEx spend during Q2 was $6.1 million, and total CapEx for the first half of 2025 is $10.4 million. Our full year CapEx budget remains unchanged at $15 million to $25 million. I will now turn it back to Ann.

Thank you, Guy. As I mentioned, we saw many operators reduce activity in Q2 in response to lower oil prices. There is a possibility additional rates could come out of the market in the back half of the year, specifically from private operators, and we do expect calendar gaps, completion delays and overall more white space in conjunction with lower activity levels and oil prices. Natural gas prices remain mostly supportive, helping to drive more efficient operations in the Northeast in Haynesville and building a more positive sentiment, which has benefited our operations and earnings. The rig activity in these regions has been mostly stable. And while we would benefit from any incremental activity increases, it may not be enough to completely offset the activity and pricing declines we've seen in the Permian, which impacts all of our service lines. We are continuing to play both offense and defense to grow revenue and increase margins. This includes market share gains with current and potential new customers, R&D and technological advances across service lines, growing our International Tools business, construction of our new Completion Tools facility and potentially expanding service lines to new geographies, which we are currently evaluating. We have been able to utilize Wireline equipment and personnel from West Texas to cover work in the Northeast, and we are constantly evaluating where to best utilize our assets and people in conjunction with market dynamics. We remain focused on increasing our exposure to international markets, and I believe the team has implemented this strategy well thus far, demonstrated by our 20% revenue increase in the first half of the year versus 2024. In conjunction with these growth initiatives, we are working on reducing costs without impeding the quality of our business. Over the last 12 months, we believe we have taken significant sustainable costs out of the business. These include, but are not limited to, improvements in fleet management and maintenance, reduction of corporate and field employees, reduction or elimination of consultants, software and subscriptions and the consolidation and rationalization of vendors. We will continue to prioritize reducing costs while not impeding the quality of our technology, service and safety. In Q3, we will see full quarter realizations of activity and pricing declines made throughout Q2. As I mentioned, we also anticipate more white space in the calendar in the oil-levered basin. Because of this, we anticipate both revenue and adjusted EBITDA will be down compared to Q2 and project Q3 revenue between $135 million and $145 million. Our team is focused on increasing profitability in a declining market. We are nimble and diversified in both our service and technology offerings and commodities. This has and will continue to allow us to navigate these uncertain markets while still being viable.

Our first question comes from Waqar Syed with ATB.

Ann, you mentioned that there is some expectation that some private E&Ps may temper their work. Is that based on firm discussions with the customers? Or is that just your view based on what your view on commodity prices is?

It's a great question, Waqar. Actually, it is not based on conversations. It's based on our knowledge that if commodity prices were to move very negatively for the remainder of the quarter or in Q4, those private operators typically will react more quickly than the public. And so that's just the commentary, is this going to be for them more commodity price driven and they'll be more reactionary than our large public.

Sure. And then in terms of your visibility into Q4, do you have any visibility there where customers have mentioned anything what they're going to be doing in Q4?

We don't have visibility into Q4 regarding any major changes. However, we have had customer conversations suggesting increased activity in Q1, which is typical with budget refresh, but there is nothing specifically for Q4.

And this increased activity in Q1, is this Permian comment or all over U.S. comment?

Specifically with certain customers in the Permian.

Okay. And is that relative to where activity was in Q2? Or where relative activity is as of today?

That would be an increase relative to activity as of today.

Okay. Fair enough. Now Ann, in terms of your international sales, it looks like a pretty decent pickup in first half '25 versus last year's first half. Could you maybe highlight how was second half '24 versus the first half of '24? And how does first half '25 compare to the second half of '24?

We experienced a 20% increase in the first half compared to the second half and from the first half of last year. This market is unpredictable and can be quite erratic. Notably, we have seen significant progress in Argentina and the Middle East. While it is difficult to forecast the exact year-over-year growth, we anticipate an increase. Looking ahead to 2025, we expect our international numbers to be higher than in 2024.

Great. And then in the traction, what products are you seeing the most traction with in the international markets?

We're seeing it with our plugs and our MCBV valves, and it's been really nice big volume orders.

All right. And do you have any visibility into the second half for these international sales?

Again, it will be lumpy. What I can say is that if you look at the full year, we definitely anticipate to be up over last year.

Okay. Great. Yes, I think that's all for me for now. I appreciate the color. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of John Daniel with Daniel Energy Partners.

Ann, the first question has to do with the Completion Tools facility that you highlighted. Can you tell us a bit more about this and what it's expected to do, where it will be? Anything like that would be helpful.

Sure. Yes. Definitely not going to give away too many secrets, but it's going to be a little over 30,000 square feet. We're going to put this right next to our assembly and manufacturing location in Jacksboro. We're going to have multiple test wells, where we are also going to be able to test lots of different pressures, temperatures. We're going to have drill out capabilities, flowback loop, all kinds of capabilities for our customers to log in and see all these test results. I think this will be probably the largest state-of-the-art completion tools testing facility in the U.S. And John, this is also becoming increasingly important for our international customers. So as you know, with sustaining engineering, when you're working on fielding these tools, if issues arise, you need to be able to immediately test that. They need to be able to see those results. So we're just extremely excited about this. Very, very excited.

Does it open this year? Or is it next year event?

It's a next year opening.

Okay. Got it. The next one is with the hope that we see some private operators, particularly in the gassy markets continue to pick up activity. I'm just curious, in your experience, would you maybe say that there's a little bit less procurement rigor, vis-a-vis their larger public peers? I mean, would these be additive to margins, if you will, just maybe because of less pricing power on the part of those buyers?

Sure. As customers grow larger, they often rely more on procurement, which can distance operations from decision-making. This can lead to decreased efficiency in the field. A relevant example is the merger of Pioneer and Exxon. Smaller private companies tend to be more focused on operations, are often quite efficient, and give their field engineers the freedom to choose the best service lines, vendors, and technologies. This generally benefits us. These companies are also quick and decisive, which is promising for us. Additionally, the competitive landscape in regions like Haynesville and the Northeast is less intense compared to the Permian, making those gas markets favorable for us. We're optimistic about the increasing demand for power generation from natural gas, and we believe in the ongoing strength of the natural gas market.

Got it. Okay. And the final one is in the press release, you've highlighted the incremental market share in the remedial Wireline business. Is there any one thing in particular that is driving that?

We have annual strategic meetings and began this initiative a few years ago. The leader of that business is highly knowledgeable in both pump down and remedial Wireline. This effort was aimed at diversifying our top line from the fluctuations of pump down work, and he has performed exceptionally well. I want to express my gratitude for your participation in today's call, and I would also like to thank our employees, E&P partners, and investors. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.