Good afternoon. My name is Sarah and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to NVIDIA's fourth quarter earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. So, Shia Hari, you may begin your conference.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to NVIDIA's conference call for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026. With me today from NVIDIA are Jensen Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Colette Kress, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Our call is being webcast live on NVIDIA's Investor Relations website. The webcast will be available for replay until the conference call to discuss our financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2027. The content of today's call is NVIDIA's property. It can't be reproduced or transcribed without our prior written consent. During this call, we may make forward-looking statements based on current expectations. These are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties, and our actual results may differ materially. For a discussion of factors that could affect our future financial results in business, please refer to the disclosure in today's earnings release, our most recent Forms 10-K and 10-Q, and the reports that we may file on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All our statements are made as of today, February 25, 2026, based on information currently available to us. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any such statements. During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. You can find a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures in our CFO commentary, which is posted on our website. With that, let me turn the call over to Colette.

Thanks, Tushia. We delivered another outstanding quarter with record revenue, operating income, and free cash flow. Total revenue of $68 billion was up 73% year over year, accelerating from Q3. Growth on a sequential basis was also a record as we added $11 billion in data center revenue across a diverse and expanding set of customers, including cloud providers, hyperscalers, AI model makers, enterprises, and sovereign nations. Demand for our Blackwell architecture, extreme co-design at data center scale, continues to strengthen as inference deployments grow in addition to training. The transition to accelerated computing and the infusion of AI across existing hyperscale workloads continue to fuel our growth. agentic and physical ai applications built on increasingly smarter and multimodal models are beginning to drive our financial performance on a full year basis data center generated revenue of 194 billion up 68 percent year over year we have now scaled our data center business by nearly 13x since the emergence of chat gpt in fiscal 2023 we look ahead we expect sequential revenue growth throughout calendar 2026 exceeding what was included in the 500 billion blackwell and reuben revenue opportunity we shared last year we believe we have inventory and supply commitments in place to address future demand, including shipments extending into calendar 2027. Every data center is power constrained. Customers make critical architectural decisions based on performance per watt given these constraints and the need to maximize AI factory revenue semi-analysis declared nvidia inference king as recent results from inference x reinforced our inference leadership with gb300 nvl 72 achieving up to 50x performance per watt and 35x lower cost per token compared with offering and continuous optimization of cuda software help deliver up to five times better performance on GB200 and VL72, just within four months. NVIDIA produces the lowest cost per token, and data centers running on NVIDIA generate the highest revenues. Our pace of innovation, particularly at our scale, is unmatched. Fueled by an annual R&D budget approaching $20 billion and our ability to extreme co-design across compute and networking across chips, systems, algorithms, and softwares, we intend to deliver X-factor leaps in performance per watt every generation and extend our leadership position over the long term. Q4 data center revenue of $62 billion increased 75% year over year and 22% sequentially, driven primarily by sustained strength in Blackwell and the Blackwell Ultra Ramp. With NVIDIA infrastructure in high demand, even Hopper and much of the six-year-old Ampere-based products are sold out in the cloud. Nearly a year has passed since the release of our Grace Blackwell GNVL72 systems. Today, nearly nine gigawatts of infrastructure on Blackwell are deployed and consumed by the major cloud service providers, hyperscalers, AI model makers, and enterprises. networking a cornerstone of our data center scale infrastructure offering was a standout this quarter generating 11 billion in revenue up more than 3.5x year over year demand for our scale up and scale out technologies reached record levels both growing double digit sequentially driven by strong adoption of NVLink, Spectrum X Ethernet, and Infinibam. On a year-over-year basis, growth was driven primarily by NVLink 72 scale-up switches as Grace Blackwell Systems accounted for roughly two-thirds of data center revenue in the quarter. NVLink's scale-up fabric has revolutionized computing and demonstrates the power of extreme co-design across all of the chips of the supercomputer and the full stack. In Q4, we announced that we will enable AWS with NVLink to integrate with their custom silicon. Momentum is strong with our Spectrum X Ethernet scale up and scale across networking as customers work to unify distributed data centers into integrated gigascale AI factories. For the full year, our networking business exceeded $31 billion in revenue, up more than 10x compared to fiscal 2021, the year we acquired Mellanox. Our demand profile is broad, diverse, and expanding beyond just chatbots. First, there is a fundamental platform shift from classical machine learning to generative AI. Strong evidence of ROI as hyperscalers upgrade massive traditional workloads to generative AI, including search, ad generation, and content recommender systems, is encouraging our largest customers to accelerate their capital spending. For example, at Meta, advancements in their gem model drove a 3.5 increase in ad clicks on Facebook, and more than 1% gain in conversations on Instagram, translating into meaningful revenue growth. With the same NVIDIA infrastructure, Meta Superintelligence Labs can train and deploy their frontier agentic AI systems. Frontier agentic systems have reached an inflection point. Cloud Code, Cloud Cowork, and OpenAI Codecs have achieved useful intelligence. Adoption is skyrocketing, and tokens are profitable, driving extreme urgency to scale up compute. Compute directly translates to intelligence and revenue growth. Analysts' expectations for 2026 CapEx across the top five cloud providers and hyperscalers who collectively account for a little over 50% of our data center revenue are up nearly $120 billion since the start of the year and approaching $700 billion. We continue to expect the transition of classic data center workloads to GPU-accelerated computing and the use of AI to enhance today's hyperscale workloads and contribute toward roughly half of our long-term opportunity. Every country will build and operate some parts of its AI infrastructure, just like with electricity and internet today. In fiscal year 2026, our sovereign AI business more than tripled year over year and over $30 billion, driven primarily by customers based in Canada, France, the Netherlands, Singapore, and the UK. Over the long run, we expect our sovereign opportunity to grow at least in line with the AI infrastructure market, as countries spend on AI proportional to their GDP. While small amounts of H-200 products for China-based customers were approved by the U.S. government, we have yet to generate any revenue, and we do not know whether any imports will be allowed into China. Our competitors in China, bolstered by recent IPOs, are making progress and have the potential to disrupt the structure of the global AI industry over the long term. To sustain its leadership position in AI compute, America must engage every developer and be the platform for choice for every commercial business, including those in China. We will continue to engage with the U.S. and China governments and advocate for America's ability to compete around the world. We unveiled the Rubin platform last month at CES, comprised of six new chips, the Vera CPU, Rubin GPU, EnvyLink 6Switch, ConnectX9 SuperNet, Bluefield 4DPU, and Spectrum 6 Ethernet Switch. The platform will train MOE models with one-fourth the number of GPUs and reduce inference token costs by up to 10x compared to Blackwell. We shipped our first Vera Rubin samples to customers earlier this week, and we remain on track to commence production shipments in the second half of the year. Based on its modular, cable-free trade design, Rubin will deliver improved resiliency and serviceability relative to Blackwell. We expect every cloud model builder to deploy Vera Rubin. Moving to gaming. Gaming revenue of $3.7 billion increased 47% year-on-year, driven by strong Blackwell demand and improved supply. GeForce RTX is the leading platform for PC gamers, creators, and developers. In Q4, we added several new technologies and advancements, including DLSS 4.5, which uses AI to bring game visuals to a new level, G-Sync Pulsar, bringing incredible clear graphics even in motion, and 35% faster LLM inference across leading AI PC frameworks. looking ahead while end demand for our products remain strong and channel inventory levels are healthy we expect supply constraints to be the headwind to gaming in q1 and beyond for professional visualization it crossed the 1 billion mark for the first time with revenue of 1.3 billion up 159 percent year over year and 74 percent sequentially during the quarter we launched the rtx pro 5000 blackwell workstation with 72 gigabytes of fast memory for ai ai developers running llms and agentic workflows automotive revenue of 604 million was up six percent year-over-year and was driven by robust demand for self-driving solutions at ces we introduced alpamayo the world's first open portfolio of reasoning vision language action models simulation blueprints and data sets enabling vehicles that can think the first passenger car featuring Alpamayo, built on NVIDIA Drive, will be on the road soon in the new Mercedes-Benz CLA. Physical AI is here, having already contributed north of $6 billion in NVIDIA revenue in fiscal year 2026. Robotaxi rides are growing exponentially with commercial fleets from Waymo, Tesla, Uber, WeRide, and Zoox, and many others are expected to scale from thousands of vehicles in 2025 to millions over the next decade, creating a market poised to generate hundreds of billions of dollars of revenue. This expansion will demand orders of a magnitude more compute with every major OEM and service provider developing on NVIDIA's platform. We continue to advance robotics development with the new NVIDIA Cosmos and ISA Group, Open Models, Frameworks, and NVIDIA's powered robots and autonomous machines for leading companies, including Boston Dynamics, Caterpillar, Franco Robotics, LG Electronics, and Neuro Robotics. To accelerate industrial physical AI adoption, we also announced new expanding partnerships with Dassault Systems, Siemens, and Synopsys to bring NVIDIA AI infrastructure, Omniverse Digital Twins, World Models, and CUDAX libraries to millions of researchers, designers, and engineers building the world's industries. Let's move to the rest of the P&L. Gap gross margin was 75%, and non-gap gross margin was 75.2%, increasing sequentially as backwell continued to ramp. Gap operating expenses were up 16% sequentially and up 21% on a non-gap basis related to new product introductions and compute and infrastructure costs. Non-gap effective tax rate for the fourth quarter was 15.4%, below our outlook for the quarter, primarily due to the impact of a one-time tax benefit. Inventory grew 8% quarter-over-quarter, while purchase commitments also increased significantly, as we have strategically secured inventory and capacity to meet demand beyond the next several quarters. This is further out in time than usual and reflects the longer demand visibility we have. While we expect tightness in the supply for our advanced architectures to persist, we remain confident in our ability to capitalize on the growth opportunity ahead with our scale, expansive supply chain, and the longstanding partnerships continuing to serve us well. We generated free cash flow of $35 billion in Q4 and $97 billion in fiscal year 2026. For the year, we returned $41 billion, or 43% of free cash flow, to our shareholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends. We continue to invest in our technology and our ecosystem to cultivate market development, drive long-term growth, and ultimately yield total shareholder returns superior to the market or our peer group. Importantly, we will continue to run a strategic and disciplined process as it relates to our investments, and we remain committed to returning capital to our shareholders. Let me turn to the outlook for the first quarter. Starting this quarter, we will be including stock-based compensation expense in our non-GAAP results. Stock bank compensation is a foundational component of our compensation program to attract and retain world-class talent. Let me first start with revenue. Total revenue is expected to be $78 billion, plus or minus 2%. We expect most of our growth to be driven by data center. Consistent with last quarter, we are not assuming any data center compute revenue from China in our outlook. GAAP and non-GAAP gross margins are expected to be 74.9% and 75% respectively, plus or minus 50 basis points. For the full year, we continue to see gross margins in the mid-70s. We will keep you updated on our progress as we prepare for the Vera Rubin transition. GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses are expected to be approximately $7.7 billion and $7.5 billion, respectively, including stock-based compensation expense of $1.9 billion. For the full year, we expect non-GAAP operating expenses to grow in the low 40s on a year-over-year basis as we continue to invest in our expanding opportunity set. For the full year, fiscal year 27, we expect gap and non-gap tax rates to be in between 7 and 19 percent, excluding any discrete items and material changes to our tax environment. With that, let me turn the call over to Jensen. I think he has

a few words for us. This quarter, we significantly deepened and expanded our partnerships with leading frontier model makers. We recently celebrated OpenAI's launch of GPT 5.3 Codex, trained with and inferencing on Grace Blackwell and V-Link 72 systems. GPT 5.3 Codex can take on long-running tasks that involve research, tool use, and complex execution. 5.3 Codex is deployed broadly inside NVIDIA. Our engineers love it. We continue to work with OpenAI toward a partnership agreement and believe we are close. We are thrilled with our ongoing partnership with OpenAI, a once-in-a-generation company we've had the pleasure of partnering with since their first days. Meta Superintelligence Labs is scaling up at lightning speed. Last week, we announced that Meta is deploying millions of Blackwells and Ruben GPUs. NVIDIA CPUs, and Spectrum X Ethernet for training and inference. This quarter, we announced a partnership with Anthropic and a $10 billion investment in their company. Anthropic will train and inference on Grace Blackwell and Verirubin systems. Anthropic's cloud codework agent platform is revolutionary and has opened the floodgates for enterprise AI adoption. Between Claude Cowork and OpenClaw, compute demand is skyrocketing, and chat GPT moment of agentic AI has arrived. With partnerships spanning Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, and XAI, NVIDIA deployed across every cloud, and with our ability to build full-stack AI infrastructure from the ground up or support them in the cloud. We're uniquely positioned to partner with Frontier model builders at every stage, training, inference, and AI factory scale-out. Finally, we recently entered into a non-exclusive licensing agreement with Grok for its low-latency inference technology and welcomed a team of brilliant engineers to NVIDIA. As we did with Mellanox, we will extend NVIDIA's architecture with Grok's innovations to enable new levels of AI infrastructure performance and value. We look forward to sharing more at GTC

next month. Okay, back to you. We will now transition to Q&A. Operator, please pull for

questions. At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from Vivek Aria with Bank of America Securities. Your line

is open. Thanks for taking my question. I think you mentioned that you now have growth visibility into calendar 27 also, and I think your purchase commitments kind of reflect that confidence. But Jensen, I'm curious, you know, when you look at your top cloud customers, cloud capex close to $700 billion this year. Many investors are concerned that it would be harder for this level to grow into next year. And for several of them, their cash flow generation capability is also getting compressed. So I know you're very confident about your roadmap, right, and your purchase commitments and whatnot. But how confident are you about your customers' ability to continue to grow their CapEx? And if their CapEx doesn't grow, can NVIDIA still find a way to grow in that envelope. Thank you. I am confident in their cash flow growing. And the reason for that

is very simple. We have now seen the inflection of agentic AI and the usefulness of agents across the world and enterprises everywhere. You're seeing incredible compute demand because of it. In this new world of AI, compute is revenues. Without compute, there's no way to generate tokens. Without tokens, there's no way to grow revenues. So in this new world of AI, compute equals revenues. And I am certain that at this point, with the productive use of Codex and Cloud Code and the excitement around Cloud Cowork and just the incredible enthusiasm about OpenClaw and the enterprise versions of them. All of the enterprise ISVs who are now working on agentic systems on top of their tools platforms. I'm certain at this point that we are at the inflection point, we've reached the inflection point and we're generating profitable tokens that are productive for customers and profitable for the cloud service providers. And so the simple logic of it, the simple way to think about it is computing has changed. What used to be software running on computers, modest amount of computers, call it $300 or $400 billion worth of CapEx each year, has now gone into AI. And AI, in order to have, in order to generate tokens, you need compute capacity. And that translates directly to growth and that translates directly to revenues.

Your next question comes from Joe Moore with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Great. And congratulations on the numbers. You talked about some of the strategic investments that you've made into Anthropic and potentially OpenAI. core as well but also partners intel nokia synopsis you know you're you're clearly at the center of everything can you talk about the role of those investments and kind of how do you view the balance sheet as a tool to kind of grow the nvidia's position the ecosystem and and

participate in that growth as you know fundamentally at the core of everything nvidia is our ecosystem that's what everybody loves about our business the richness of our ecosystem just about every startup in the world is working on NVIDIA's platform. We're in every cloud. We're in every on-prem data center. We're all over the world's edge and robotic systems. Thousands of AI natives are built on top of NVIDIA. We want to take the great opportunity that we have as we're in the beginning of this new computing era, this new computing platform shift, to put everybody on NVIDIA. Everything is already built on CUDA. And so we're starting from a really terrific starting point. But as we build out the entire AI ecosystem, whether it's in AI for language or physical AI or AI physics or biology or robotics or manufacturing, we want all of these ecosystems to be built on top of NVIDIA. And this is such a wonderful opportunity for us to invest into the ecosystem across the entire stack. Our ecosystem is also richer today than it used to be. We used to be largely a computing platform on GPUs, but now we're a computing AI infrastructure company, and we have computing platforms on, well, every aspect of that. And everything from computing to AI models to networking to our DPU, All of that has computing stacks on top of it. And as I mentioned before, whether it's an enterprise or in manufacturing, industrial or science or robotics, each one of these ecosystems have different stacks. And we want to make sure that we continue to invest into our ecosystem. So our investments are focused very squarely, strategically on expanding and deeply our ecosystem reach.

Your next question comes from Harlan Suhr with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Networking continues to rise as a percentage of your overall data center profile, right? Through fiscal 26, your networking revenue is accelerated on a year-over-year basis every single quarter, right? With 3.6x growth, as you guys mentioned, year-over-year growth in Q4. Obviously, on the strength of your scale-up and scale-out networking product portfolio, I seem to remember that first half of last year, your annualized run rate on your Spectrum X Ethernet switching platform was around $10 billion annualized. It looks like that may have stepped up to around $11, $12 billion in the second half of last year. Vincent, looking at your order book, especially with Spectrum XGS, upcoming 102T Spectrum 6 switching platforms launching soon, where is the Spectrum run rate trending now and as you foresee exiting sort of this calendar year?

Yeah. As you know, we see ourselves as an AI infrastructure company, and the AI computing infrastructure includes CPUs, GPUs, and we invented MVLink to scale up one computing node into a giant computing rack. We invented the idea of a rack-scale computer. We don't ship nodes of computers. We ship racks of computers. And that NVLink switch scale-up system is then scaled out using Spectrum X and InfiniBand. We support both. And then further, we also scale across data centers using Spectrum X scale-across. And so the way we think about networking is really an extension. We offer everything openly so that people could decide to mix and match in different scale and, you know, however they would like to integrate it into their bespoke data center. But in the final analysis, it's all one big part of our platform. And the invention of MVLink really turbocharged our networking business. Every rack comes with nine nodes of switches. And each one of them has two chips in it. And in the future, they'll have more. And so the amount of switching that we do per rack is really quite incredible. We're also now the largest networking company in the world. And if you look at Ethernet, we came into the Ethernet market about a couple of years ago into Ethernet switching. And I think that we're probably the largest Ethernet networking company in the world today and surely will be soon. And so Spectrum X Ethernet has been a home run for us. But, you know, we're open to however people want to do networking. Some people just really love the low latency and the scale-up capability of InfiniBand, and we will continue to support that, of course. And some people love to integrate their networking across their data center based on Ethernet, and we created an Ethernet capability that extends Ethernet with artificial intelligence, a way of processing in the data center, and we're incredibly good at that. And our Spectrum X performance really shows it. You know, the difference of when you built a $10 billion or $20 billion AI factory, the difference of 10%, you know, and it could be easily 20% on the effectiveness and the utilization of your network for your data center, that translates to real money. And so NVIDIA's networking business is really, really growing fast. And it's, you know, I think it's just because we built the AI infrastructure so effectively, and the AI infrastructure business is growing incredibly fast.

Your next question comes from CJ Muse with Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is open.

Yeah, good afternoon. Thank you for taking the question. I guess with CPX for large context, Windows and Grok, likely adding a decode-specific solution, curious how we should think about your future roadmap. Julie, do you think about customized silicon either by workload or customer as an increase in focus by NVIDIA, particularly helped by your move to a dilate architecture? Thanks so much.

um we don't use we we want to everybody should want to extend push out dilate as long as they can and the reason for that is because every time you cross a dilate you have a dilate you have to cross an interface every time you cross an interface you add latency you add power unnecessarily we're not allergic to dilate we use dilates already but we try to use dilates only when we absolutely have no choice but to do so and so we if you look at the grace blackwall architecture and the ruben architecture we use two giant reticle limited dies and we abut them and that reduces the amount of architecture crossing the dilate tax shows up in the architecture effectiveness of um of the competitors if you look at nvidia people call it our software advantage but you know where software starts and architecture starts and ends it's kind of hard to tell. It's, you know, our software is effective because our architecture is so good. And so the CUDA architecture is unquestionably more effective, more efficient, delivers more performance per flop per watt than any computing architecture out there. And it's because of the way we architect. With respect to how we think about Grok and the low latency decoder, I've got some great ideas that I'd like to share with you at GTC. But the simple idea is that our infrastructure is incredibly versatile because of CUDA, and we're going to continue to do that. All of our GPUs are architecturally compatible, which means that when I'm working on optimizing models today for Blackwell, all of that work and all that dedication to optimizing software stacks and new models. also benefit Hopper and also benefit Ampere. It's the reason why A100 continues to feel fresh and continues to stay performant years after we've deployed it into the world. Architecture compatibility allows us to do that. It allows us to invest enormously in software engineering and optimization, knowing that our entire install base in the cloud, on-prem everywhere from generations of architectures of GPUs will all benefit. And so we'll continue to do that and allows us to extend the useful life, allows us to have innovation flexibility and velocity, which translates to performance and very importantly, performance per dollar and performance per watt for our customers. And so what we'll do with Rock is you'll come to see GTC But what we'll do is we'll extend our architecture with Grok as an accelerator in very much the ways that we extended NVIDIA's architecture with Mellanox.

The next question comes from Stacey Raskin with Bernstein Research. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Colette, I wanted to dig a little bit into the call for sequential growth through the year. So, I mean, you grew this quarter more than $10 billion sequentially in data center, and the guide seems to imply, you know, the bulk of the increased $10 billion sequential in data center. How do you see that as we go through the year, especially as Rubin ramps into the back half? Blackwell has been a pretty massive acceleration for sequential growth. Should we expect something similar as we get to Rubin? And then I was also just hoping you could comment on your expectations for gaming. I understand the memory issues and everything else. Do you think gaming can still grow year over year in fiscal 27, or will that be under more pressure given memory? So those two questions, please. Thank you.

Thanks, Stacey. Let me start with the revenue going forward. Again, we're trying to look at revenue quarter by quarter. As you think about the full year, we are absolutely going to be still selling and providing Blackwell, probably at the same time that we're also seeing Vera Rubin come to market. This is a very great architecture that helps them just today quickly standing up and have already planned on many different orders across the different customers to provide that. It's too early yet to determine how much in terms of that Vera Rubin, that beginning ramp will start in the second half and we'll get through it. but no confusion in terms of the strong demand and the interest. We do expect pretty much every single customer to be purchasing Vera Rubin. The question is, how soon are we in market and how soon are they able to stand that up in terms of in their data centers? That was your first part. The second part was focusing on our gaming. As much as we would love to have additional more supply, we do believe for a couple quarters, it is going to be very tight. If things improve by the end of the year, there is an opportunity to think about what that is from a year-over-year growth. But it's still too early for us to know at this time, and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

Your next question comes from Atif Malik with Citi. Your line is open.

Thank you for taking my question. Jensen, I'm curious if you can touch on the importance of CUDA, as now more of the investment dollars in AI are coming from inference workloads?

Without CUDA, we wouldn't know what to do with inference. The entire stack from TensorRTLM that we introduced a few years ago, which is still the most performant inference stack in the world, optimizing it for MVLink requires us to discover and invent new parallelization algorithms sits on top of CUDA is to distribute the workload and the inferencing to take advantage of the aggregate bandwidth across MVLink 72. MVLink 72 has enabled us to deliver generationally 50 times more performance per Y. It's just an incredible lead and it's sensible. Now, NVLink 72 is a great invention. It was hard to do. The creation of the switching technology, disaggregating the switches, building the system racks, all of that, you know, we did it all in plain sight and everybody knew how hard it was for us to do. And, but the results are incredible, you know, so performance per watt is 50 times, performance per dollar, 35 times. And so the leap and inference is incredible. it's very important it's really important to realize that inference equals revenues now for our customers because agents are generating so many tokens and the results are so effective when the agents are coding it's off generating thousands tens of thousands hundreds of thousands because they're running for you know minutes to hours and so these systems these agentic systems are spawning off different agents working as a team the number of tokens that are being generated is really really gone exponential and so so we need to inference at a much higher speed and when you're inferencing at a much higher speed and each one of those tokens are dollarized it directly translates into revenues and so inference equals inference performance equals revenues for our customers. For the data centers, inference tokens per watt translates directly to the revenues of the CSPs. And the reason for that is because everybody is power limited. And so, I mean, no matter how many data centers you have, each data center, you know, 100 megawatts or one gigawatt has power limits. So the architecture that has the best performance per watt translates because each token, the performance tokens per watt, each token is dollarized. Tokens per watt translates to dollars per watt, which translates in a gigawatt directly to revenues. And so you could see that every CSP understands this now, every hyperscaler understands hands is that capex translates to compute compute with the right architecture translates to maximizing revenues and compute equals revenues without investing capacity today without investing in compute there cannot be revenue growth and that that i think everybody understands compute equals revenues choosing the right architecture is incredibly important it's more than strategic now. It directly affects their earnings, and choosing the right architecture, the one with the best performance per watt, is literally everything. Your next question comes from

Ben Reitzes with Melius Research. Your line is open. Yeah, hey, thanks. First, let me say kudos

on including the stock comp in non-GAAP. I think that's a great move, but that isn't my question. My question is around gross margins and the sustainability of the mid-70s long-term. Should we read into the visibility on supply being available into calendar 27, that it's sustainable until then? And then, Jensen, what about after that? Are there innovations in memory consumption you can unveil that makes us feel better about the ability to keep margins at that level for a long time?

the single most important lever of our gross margins is actually delivering generational leaps to our customers that is the single most important thing if we could deliver generationally performance per watt that exceeds dramatically what Moore's Law can do If we can deliver performance per dollar dramatically more than the cost of our systems, than the price of our systems, then we can continue to sustain our gross margins. That's the simple, most important concept. The reason why we're moving so fast is because, number one, the demand for tokens in the world as a result of the inflection points that we've gone through has now gone completely exponential. I think we're all seeing that to the point where even our six-year-old GPUs in the cloud are completely consumed and the pricing is going up. And so we know that the amount of computation necessary, the amount of compute necessary for the modern way of doing software is growing exponentially. And so our strategy is to deliver an entire AI infrastructure every single year. This year, we introduced six new chips. Ruben, next generation, will do many new chips as well. And every single generation, we are committed to deliver many X factors of performance per watt and performance per dollar. And that pace and our ability to do extreme co-design allows us to deliver that value and that benefit to the customers. And that is the single most vital thing as it relates to our value delivery.

Your next question comes from Antoine Chiquetan with New Street Research. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks a lot for taking my question. I'd like to ask about space data centers, which some of your customers are considering. How feasible do you think that is and on what kind of horizon? And what do the economics look like today? And how do you think that could evolve over time?

Thank you. Well, the economics are poor today, but it's going to improve over time. As you know, the way that space works is radically different than how it works down here. There's an abundance of energy, but solar panels are large, but there's plenty of space in space. The heat dissipation, it's cold in space. However, there's no airflow, and so the only way to dissipate heat is through conduction. and the radiators that you need to create are fairly large liquid cooling is obviously out of the question because it kind of it's heavy and you know freezes and and so the methods that we use here on earth are are a little different than the way we would do it in space but there are many different computing problems that really wants to be done in space and so nvidia is already the world's first GPU in space, hoppers in space. And one of the best use cases of, of GPUs in space is imaging, to be able to image, image at extremely high resolutions using, using, of course, of course, optics and, and, and artificial intelligence. And to be able to do that computation of reprojection of different angles and be able to, to up res and do noise reduction And just to be able to see, be able to image at very large, very high resolutions, extremely large scales, and very, very fast. It's hard to do that by sending petabytes and petabytes of imaging data back here on Earth and doing that work. It's easier just to do it out in space. And then ignore all of the data collected and processed until you see something interesting. And so artificial intelligence in space will have very good, very interesting applications.

Your next question comes from Mark Lipakis with Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I want to pick up the comment you made on the script about revenue diversification. I believe, Colette, you said that hyperscalers were over 50% of revenues, but growth was led by the rest of your data center customers. And as a clarification, I just want to make sure I understood that. Does that imply your non-hyperscale customers grew faster? And if so, can you help us understand what are the non-hyperscalers doing different? Are they doing different things than the hyperscalers or the same things on a different scale? And do you expect this trend to continue? Do you expect your customer base to evolve to a point where non-hyperscalers become a bigger part of your, the larger part of your business?

Yes. Let's see if we can help on this question. So when you think about our top five, as we articulated as being our CSPs, our hyperscalers, and they have right now sat at about 50% of our total revenue. There's a big organization, therefore, of diversity of all different other types of companies that we are working with, that it goes through our AI model makers, that goes through our enterprises, that goes to supercomputing, it goes to our sovereigns. There's a lot of other different facts on there. But you are correct. It's a very fast-growing area as well. We have a strong position in terms of all of our different cloud providers on our platform. and now we also have a extreme diversity of different customers that we are seeing all the way across the world and this will really benefit uh seeing that diversity and being able to serve all of uh those parts let me see if jensen wants to yeah this is one of the advantages that we

have with our ecosystem i'll build on tapakuda we have we're we're the only accelerated computing platform that is in every cloud that's available through every single computer maker uh available at the edge and uh we're now cultivating uh telecommunications obviously the future radios will all be ai driven radios and and the future wireless network will also be a computing platform that is a foregone conclusion but somebody has to go and invent the technologies to make that possible and we created the tech we created a platform called ariel to go do that uh where we're out in just about every single robot every single self-driving car um our ability cuda's ability uh to have the benefit of the performance of specialized processors on the one hand with the tensor cores inside our gpus on the other hand the flexibility of cuda allows us to solve language problems, computer vision problems, robotics problems, to biology problems, you know, physics problems, and just about all kinds of AI and all kinds of computation algorithms. And so the diversity of our customer base is one of the greatest strengths that we have. The second thing, of course, is without our own ecosystem, even if our processor was was programmable. If we didn't cultivate our ecosystem and talking about some of the things that we were, we're doing today, investing in our future ecosystem and continue to enhance our ecosystem without our ecosystem, it's hard for us to grow beyond what design wins we capture for somebody else's ecosystem. And so we could grow and expand our ecosystem very naturally because of the platform that we created. And then lastly, one of the things that's really important is the partnerships that we have with OpenAI and Anthropic, with XAI, with Meta, now makes, and of course, just about every single open source in the world. There's one and a half million AI models on Hugging Face. All of it runs on NVIDIA CUDA. And so an open source in totality probably represents the largest, the second largest model in the world, OpenAI is the largest, second largest is probably all the collection of all the open sources. And so NVIDIA's ability to run all of that makes our platform super fungible, super easy to use, and really safe to invest into. And so that creates the diversity of customers and the diversity of the platforms available in every single country because, you know, we support the whole world's ecosystem.

Your next question comes from Aaron Rakers with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Yeah, thanks for taking the question. And I guess, you know, sticking with the idea of the platform and extreme co-design, some of the news over this last quarter has obviously been NVIDIA's ability or push to bring Vira CPUs to market on a standalone solution basis. So I guess, Jensen, I'm curious, what's the importance that Vira plays in this architecture evolution as we move forward? Is this being driven more by the proliferation or the heterogeneity of inference workloads? But I'm just curious of how you see that evolving for NVIDIA, particularly on a standalone CPU basis.

Yeah, thanks. And I'll tell you some more about it at GTC. But at the highest level, we made fundamentally different architecture decisions about our CPUs compared to the rest of the world's CPUs. It's the only data center CPU that supports LPDDR5. It is designed to be focused on very high data processing capabilities. And the reason for that is because most of the computing problems that we're interested in are data driven, artificial intelligence being one. And the single threaded performance in this ratio with bandwidth is just off the charts. off the charts. And we made those architectural decisions because in the entire phase, the different phases of AI from data processing, before you even do training, you have to do data processing. So you have data processing, pre-training, and in post-training now, the AIs are learning how to use tools, and the usage of tools, many of those tools run in CPU-only environments, or they run in CPU with GPU-accelerated environments. And Vera was designed to be an excellent CPU for post-training. And so some of the use cases in the entire pipeline of artificial intelligence includes using a lot of CPUs. You know, we love CPUs as well as GPUs. And when you accelerate the algorithms to the limit as we have, Amdahl's law would suggest that you need really, really fast single-threaded CPUs. And that's the reason why we built Grace to be extraordinarily great at single-threaded performance, and Vera is off the charts better than that.

Next question comes from Tim Arcuri with UBS. Your line is open.

Thanks a lot. Colette, I was wondering if you can talk about the deployment of capital. I know that you really jacked up the purchase commits, but it sounds like maybe you're over the hump on this, and you're going to probably generate about $100 billion in cash this year. So and, you know, pretty much no matter how good the results have been, the stock hasn't really gone up, gone up much. So I think it's you probably feel like this is a pretty good price to be buying back a bunch of it here. So I was wondering if you can talk about that, like, you know, question being, why not put a big stake in the ground and just have a huge share of repo here?

Thanks. So thanks for the question. We look at our capital return very, very carefully, and we do believe that one of the most important things that we can do is really supporting the extreme ecosystem that's in front of us, that stems from everywhere, from our suppliers and the work that we need to do to assure that we can have the supply that's needed and help them from a capacity. all the way that we are in terms of the early developers of the AI solutions that will be on our platform. So we will continue to make this a very important part of our process and strategic investments. But of course, we are still repurchasing our stock. We are still with our dividend as well. And we will continue to find the right unique opportunities within the year for doing those different purchases.

Your final question comes from Jim Schneider with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Thank you for taking my question. Jonathan, you've previously outlined the potential to get to $3 to $4 trillion of data center CAPEX by 2030, which implies a potential acceleration in growth rates, which you've sort of guided to at least this next quarter. The question is, what are some of the key application areas that you believe are most likely to drive that inflection? Is that physical AI, agentic, or something else? And do you still feel good about that $3 to $4 trillion envelope? Thank you.

Yeah, let's back that up and just reason through it from a few different ways. So the first way is our first principles. The way that software is done in the future using AI is token-driven. And I think everybody talks about tokenomics and talks about data centers generating tokens, and inference is about generating tokens, and we generate tokens, you know, we're just talking about tokens, how NVIDIA's NVLink 72 enabled us to generate tokens at 50 times better performance per unit energy than the previous generation. and so token generation is at the center of almost everything that relates to software in the future and relates to computing if you look at look at the way we use computing in the past however the amount of computation demand for software in the past is a tiny fraction of what is necessary in the future and ai is here ai is not going to go back ai is only going only get better from here and so if you think about it and you said okay well the world was investing about three to four hundred billion dollars a year in classical computing and now ai is here and the amount of computation necessary is a thousand times higher than uh the way we used to do computing the computing demand is just a lot higher and so if if we continue to believe there's value in it and we'll talk about that in a second, then the world will invest to produce that token. And so the amount of token generation capability that the world needs is a lot more than $700 billion. And I'm fairly confident that we're going to continue to generate tokens. We're going to continue to invest in compute capacity from this point out. And fundamentally, because every single company depends on software, every software will depend on AI. And so every company will produce tokens. And that's the reason why I call them AI factories. And whether you're a company in the cloud data centers, you have AI factories to generate tokens for your revenues. If you're an enterprise software company, you're going to generate tokens for the agentic systems that are on top of your tools. If you are a robotics factory and a self-driving car is the first indication of that, you have huge supercomputers, which are basically AI factories, to generate tokens that goes into your cars, that becomes its AI. And then you also have to put computers inside the cars to continuously generate tokens. And so we're fairly sure now that this is the future of computing. Now, why is it so certain that this is the future of computing? And the reason for that is because the way we used to do software was pre-recorded. Everything was captured a priori. We pre-compile the software. We pre-write the content. We pre-record the videos. But now, everything is generative in real time. And when it's generated in real time, it can take into The context of the person, the situation, the query, and the intentions could all be taken into consideration to generate the outcome of this new software called we call AI, agentic AI. And so the amount of computation necessary is far, far greater than prerecorded. You know, just as a computer has a lot more computation capability than a DVD recorder, a DVD player that was pre-recorded, artificial intelligence needs a lot more computing capability than the way we used to do software in the past. Now, the question about computation, about sustainability, at the first level is just at the computer science level, this is the way computing is going to be done. Now, from an industrial level, because all of our companies in the final analysis are powered by software, and the cloud companies are powered by software, and if the new software requires tokens to be generated, and the tokens are monetized, then it stands to reason that their data center build out directly drives their revenues. And so compute drives revenues. And I think they all understand that. I think people are increasingly starting to understand that as well. And then lastly, the benefits that AI produces for the world ultimately has to generate revenues. And we're seeing right in front, right being developed as we see, as we stand here, agentic AI has turned an inflection point. And it literally happened in the last couple of two, three months. Of course, inside the industry, we've been seeing it for a while, you know, probably six months or so. But the world is now awakened to the agentic AI inflection. The agents are super smart. They're solving real problems. Coding is obviously supported by agentic systems now. And all of our coders here at NVIDIA are using agentic systems, either Cloud Code or OpenAI Codex enormously, and oftentimes both, and Cursor, oftentimes all three, depends on the use case. But they have agents and co-design partners, engineering partners, to help them solve problems. And you could see their revenue skyrocketing. You know, these companies, in the case of Anthropic, I think their revenue's 10x'd in a year. And they are severely capacity-constrained because demand is just incredible. And the token demand is incredible. The token generation rate is growing exponentially. And the same thing with, of course, OpenAI, their demand is incredible. And so the more compute that they can stand online, bring online, the faster their revenues will grow. And that goes back to the comment that I was saying, that inference is revenues, that compute equals revenues now in this new world. And in a lot of ways, that's the reason why we say it's a new industrial revolution. There are new factories, new infrastructure being built, and this new way of doing computing is not going to go back. And so to the extent that we believe that producing tokens is going to be the future of computing, which I believe, and I think largely the industry believes, then we're going to be building out this capacity from this point forward and continue to expand from here. Now, the thing that is, the wave that we're seeing now is the agentic AI inflection, and the next inflection beyond that is physical AI, where we take AI and these agentic systems into the physical applications, such as manufacturing, such as robotics. And so, that's a giant opportunity ahead. Okay.

This concludes the question and answer session. I'll turn the call to Toshia Hari.

In closing, please note Jensen will be participating in a fireside chat at the Morgan Stanley TMT Conference in San Francisco on March 4th. He'll also be giving a keynote at GTC in San Jose on March 16th. Our earnings call to discuss the results of our first quarter of fiscal 2027 is scheduled for May 20th. Thank you for joining us today. Operator, please go ahead and close the

call. Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.