Good morning. I'm Alex Brown. And thank you for joining us. Included in today's presentation are forward-looking statements about our future business and financial performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from our projections. More information about these risks and uncertainties can be found in our earnings press release, our 2022 Form 10-K annual report, and other reports filed with the SEC that are located on our website at www.pb.com and by clicking on Investor Relations. Please keep in mind that we do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements as a result of new information or developments. Also, for non-GAAP measures that are used in the press release or discussed in our presentation materials, you can find reconciliations to the appropriate GAAP measures in the tables attached to our press release. Finally, we have provided a slide presentation and spreadsheet with historical segment information on our website. And now, I’d like to turn the call over to Marc.

Thank you, Alex. And good morning, everyone. I appreciate you all joining us this morning. The second quarter played out as we expected as trends from the first quarter largely continued. SendTech and Presort grew profit for the quarter, although SendTech less than transactions in the field that we were expecting. We expect those transactions to close in the third quarter. Presort had a solid quarter growing both revenue and profit for the second quarter. Both of these businesses are well positioned for the third quarter and the second half. Global Ecommerce continued to experience different crosscurrents. On the one hand, our cross-border business continued to face headwinds, as two of our largest clients changed how they access our offerings. Our digital expedited business trended with the overall ecommerce market. However, the large social platform opportunity I've mentioned on previous calls began to come online. It's hard to predict how this opportunity will roll out, but it can be a very interesting opportunity. Growth in our domestic parcel business, where our opportunity to create value is centered, accelerated in the second quarter and parcel growth for the quarter was around 30%. We are winning new clients and our growth is well above the market. Price and weights are less than expected, but consistent with historical periods where retail performance is under some stress. Our network continued to perform well, and our service levels are very competitive in the market. Finally, our costs are progressing as expected and are consistent with what was expected in our long-term plan. Let me unpack the cost dynamics in this business, because they provide the foundation of our confidence. Our unit cost for transportation improved 12% quarter-to-quarter and 26% year-to-year. Going forward to achieve our long-term plan, our plan assumes personnel costs trailing with inflation, transportation unit costs remaining relatively flat, labor costs inflation offset by nominal productivity and fixed cost absorption improving as volumes improve. Said another way, the plan relies on fairly standard cost improvements, resumption of market pricing and volume growth, well less than we're experiencing right now. For me, however, the big news about the quarter was how well we positioned ourselves for the second half. We got a lot of important work done. Ana will give you more details, but our restructuring program is proceeding as we expected, if not slightly ahead of schedule. Much of the cost and expense takeout is centered on GEC as we right-size that business for the reset of our cross-border business and we fine-tune to account for better-than-expected performance of the network. We also completed our refinancing, which positions the balance sheet for the next several years. Our bank began to buy receivables from our captive leasing company, fundamentally improving the earnings power of our bank and diversifying the bank's balance sheet. We've been working on this for a good bit, and this development improves the posture of our bank, which was already very strong. Finally, the July USPS rate case expanded workshare discounts, recognizing the substantial value of the workshare program to the USPS and our clients, and improving the economics of our Presort business going forward. So to summarize, the second quarter turned out as we expected. Lots of work came to fruition that set us up very well for the second half and going forward. With that, I'll turn over the floor to Ana to walk through the operating financial details of the quarter.

Thank you, Marc. And good morning, everyone. Before I begin my financial review, I'll note that the year-on-year revenue information will be discussed on a comparable basis, which, as previously discussed, adjusts for the impact of currency, the disposition of border free, and a revenue presentation change for our digital services. This revenue presentation change primarily affects Global Ecommerce revenues and to a lesser extent SendTech. The change does not affect the dollar profitability of our activities. Also, unless otherwise noted, I will speak to other items such as EBIT, EBITDA, and EPS on an adjusted basis. Total revenue for the quarter was $776 million, which is a decrease of 5% compared to the prior year’s second quarter. Gross profit for the company was $259 million, compared to $274 million for the same period last year, a 6% decrease. SG&A was $223 million in the quarter, down $4 million from the prior year, with unallocated corporate expenses at $48 million, up from $41 million a year ago, which was largely due to the timing of employee variable compensation. Interest expense, including finance interest, was $38 million, which is up $4 million due to higher interest rates on our floating debt. Adjusted EBITDA was $72 million compared to $82 million a year ago, and adjusted EBIT was $32 million compared to $39 million in the prior year. Adjusted EPS was a $0.02 loss in the quarter compared to a $0.02 loss in the prior year. GAAP EPS was a $0.81 loss in the quarter. GAAP EPS includes a non-cash $0.67 goodwill impairment charge related to the Global Ecommerce segment due to the performance of our Global Ecommerce unit through June 30, 2023, and continuing changes in macroeconomic conditions. Turning to cash flow, GAAP cash from operating activities was breakeven. Free cash flow was a use of $11 million, compared to a source of $8 million last year. CapEx for the quarter was $26 million, down from $32 million in the prior year. During the quarter we paid $9 million in dividends and made $8 million in restructuring payments. Let's dive into our three business segments. I'll start with SendTech, which reported revenues of $321 million in the quarter, down 4% compared to the prior year. We continue to make progress on our product refresh and are now 63% through the IMI migration, which is up 20 percentage points from the prior year. We are now entering a stage of our product lifecycle where we will have less new lease opportunities, offset by a corresponding increase in fixed-term lease extensions. This is largely due to our success in placing new equipment over the past several years. From a financial perspective, this shift results in lower upfront equipment sales offset by higher margin financing revenue spread over the lease term. This is a net positive to cash flow. This dynamic, coupled with transactions being deferred, played out in the second quarter with equipment sales down 11% compared to the prior year and financing revenue only down 1%. Shipping continues to be a bright spot for SendTech. In the quarter, shipping-related revenue grew 14% over the prior year and now comprises 12% of segment revenues. We remain very encouraged by the traction our shipping products are receiving, especially in the enterprise segment where we saw our largest growth. Moving to profit, adjusted segment EBIT grew 2% over the prior year as SendTech removed costs faster than revenue declined. We achieve this through initiatives to drive efficiencies and simplify the business. I will highlight two. First, we reorganized our supplier network to be less concentrated in China while also lowering the cost of equipment manufacturing and freight. These actions helped offset product mix headwinds and resulted in flat equipment gross margins year-over-year. Second, we continue to optimize our sales and customer service operations, driving more client touchpoints to lower-cost channels. For example, more than 50% of our U.S. SMB client service requests are handled via an automated chat function. This has resulted in a 22% decline in total customer touchpoints while maintaining an over 80% customer satisfaction score. These actions continue to demonstrate the durability of the business. I'll spend a moment on the performance of financial services inside of SendTech. This quarter, we made significant progress positioning our financial services for long-term success by growing finance receivables, including those held at the Pitney Bowes Bank. We also initiated a program where our bank will participate in the financing of select captive lease receivable initiatives that will be beneficial for the bank and the enterprise overall. Finance receivables grew $12 million over the quarter to $1.2 billion, and we continue to see healthy payment trends across our financing portfolio, with delinquencies improving to the best level in over 15 years. Next, let's turn to Presort. Presort generated revenue of $143 million in the quarter, up 3% from the prior year. Total sortation volume declined 5% to 3.6 billion pieces. Revenue per piece expansion and growth in higher yielding mail classes offset volume decline. Adjusted segment EBIT for the quarter was $20 million, an increase of 59% compared to last year. Adjusted segment EBIT margin improved 500 basis points to 14%. The improvement in margins highlights the team's excellent work driving operational efficiency. More specifically, margin improvement was due to better revenue per piece, continued labor productivity gains from our investments in new orders, and lower unit transportation costs. Also, as Marc mentioned, the USPS implemented new rates on July 9 that reflect the value our Presort network provides our clients and the postal service. These new rates, along with continued technology investments and operational improvements, will help drive continued strong performance in the second half. Let's shift to Global Ecommerce, where revenue was $313 million, down 9% versus the prior year. Adjusted segment EBIT was a loss of $38 million, compared to a loss of $29 million last year. Cross-border continues to weigh heavily on segment performance. The changes in how our two largest cross-border clients access our services, which we described in last quarter's earnings call, contributed to over 100% of the year-on-year declines in segment revenue and drove lower adjusted segment performance. Cross-border revenue excluding border free declined $55 million versus the prior year and $24 million versus last quarter. Gross profit was down $13 million and $4 million against the same time period. Moving forward, we expect changes in cross-border to be less significant on a sequential quarter basis. We continue to be encouraged by the progress in domestic parcel with several strong leading indicators that set the stage for improved financial performance. These are strong service levels, volume growth, and unit cost improvement. Let me unpack these items. First, service levels were very competitive in the quarter, with on-time delivery reaching the high 90s during several weeks in the quarter. This performance bolstered client satisfaction scores, and we reached an all-time high, with more new clients wanting our services. Second, domestic parcel volumes were $50 million, up 29% over the prior year against a market that is close to flat, while domestic parcel revenue grew 19%. Third, higher volumes, coupled with operational improvements, drove 8% lower unit costs versus the prior year and 3% lower versus the prior quarter. Our transportation and labor costs are now in line with our long-term model. Unit transportation costs declined 26% versus the prior year and 12% versus the prior quarter, while labor costs declined 12% and 3% against the same periods. However, similar to last quarter, a mix of lighter weight parcels combined with pricing pressures from market overcapacity resulted in lower revenue per parcel. In addition, our regional delivery offerings, which have been essential to winning more volume in the market, have also impacted revenue per parcel. These dynamics absorbed the improvements in unit cost. We have already started to address this issue with our newly signed 2023 clients, which, on average, come with a higher revenue per parcel and margin. We expect volumes from our new clients to start ramping up in the second half and scale as we move into 2024. From an operating expense perspective, we completed a significant portion of the headcount reduction plan. We also made progress on our plan to consolidate facilities. In total, we have started the process to close three facilities, all of which will occur in the third quarter. These actions marginally benefited expenses in the second quarter and will provide further benefit in the second half of the year and going forward. Cost actions combined with more attractive incremental volume that we expect to come online in the second half of the year are the major building blocks required for long-term profitability in the segment. That said, we expect continued pressure on revenue per parcel in the third quarter. Let me shift gears and discuss the meaningful progress we made on the restructuring and cost reduction plan announced last quarter. We reduced headcount and shifted more processes to shared service centers, resulting in a restructuring charge of $22 million. We are reaffirming our annual savings target of $75 million by the end of 2024 from the restructuring plan and productivity measures in Global Ecommerce. Next, regarding capital structure, we took several significant actions to strengthen our balance sheet. During the quarter, we bought $13 million of bonds in the open market, bringing the total purchase to $39 million year-to-date. Most importantly, earlier this week, we raised $275 million in a private placement offering maturing in March 2028. Net proceeds will be used to redeem the remaining balance of our 2024 notes, as well as a portion of our term loan A. After this refinancing, our next maturity will be in 2026. Moving to guidance, for the full year 2023, we expect revenue to be on the lower end of our guidance, relatively flat on a comparable basis. We continue to expect adjusted EBIT performance to outpace the percent change in revenue. We also anticipate third quarter revenue and EBIT to improve versus the second quarter as incremental volumes in Global Ecommerce, new rate cases in Presort and cost actions materialize. In conclusion, SendTech and Presort maintained strong momentum with profit growth, and while cross-border remained a headwind in the quarter, strong service levels, volume growth and unit cost improvement in domestic parcel position Global Ecommerce well for the second half.

Operator, please open the call to questions.

Thank you. One moment, we'll go to Anthony Lebiedzinksi with Sidoti and Company. Please go ahead.

Good morning. And thank you for taking the questions. So first, I guess maybe a little bit of a bigger picture question. So, this is your first public call since the Board of Directors was changed. What can you share with us so far, as far as in regards to the initial assessment of the new Board?

So listen - here's what I would say about the Board. I would say the following: the onboarding that we went through with the new Board members was terrific. They were highly engaged, asked lots of great questions, and hopefully, we passed on lots of great information. So that's the first thing I would say. So, the second thing, as we reconstituted the committees and the Board Chair, all of those votes were unanimous. So you'll see people coming together to move forward. And then I would say, though beyond that, there's a fairly intensive effort for, I would say, the entire Board, the new Board members as well as existing Board members to drive shareholder value, consistent with how you would expect.

Got it. Okay. Thanks for that. And then, in regards to GEC, obviously, cross-border was the biggest headwind within that. So, if we were to exclude cross-border, can you comment on the profitability of GEC? How the numbers could have been looking, just to kind of ballpark maybe estimates?

Yes, I would say directly domestic parcels profit increased, and expedited kind of traded with the markets. I think Ana said it in her remarks or somewhere, you know, the deterioration in cross-border revenue and profit consumed everything and then some of the progress that the rest of the segment made. So, and that's going to find its right level one way or the other. But you know, as we've said all along, and I go back to, as we contemplate our long-term plan and where the value creation opportunity is, it's in domestic parcels. So, I would say the cross-border is creating some noise right now in the results, and the team is doing their best to work their way through it. But we continue to keep our eye on the prize, and that's in the domestic parcels. And if you kind of go through that dynamic, the parcel growth in the second quarter was terrific, well above the market. The unit costs behaved exactly, if not a little bit better than we would have thought, and are consistent with kind of endpoints of the long-term plan. The service levels were terrific. Honestly, there's some pressure on revenue per piece, which is a little bit of a market phenomenon. And a little bit of some of the new customers that we've brought on, that come with slightly different revenue per piece because they're much more focused on regional types of services. So therefore, while they bring less revenue per piece, they also bring less costs. So, the more we set the cost and the revenue per piece, the more that we get confident that those dynamics are working out precisely the way that we would expect the long-term plan.

Got it. Okay. And then, so just to follow up as far as cross-border, so that's been sort of the biggest challenge for a few quarters. Is that a sub-segment that you could perhaps maybe carve out and look to divest, or is that's not something you would consider?

No, we would absolutely consider, and this is true across the board. I mean, I've always said, we certainly put the portfolio together in a way that they can share structures and get efficiencies and economies of scale and all those things. At the same time, we maintain optionality. So, if a business - and you saw it with border free - that's kind of the proof in the pudding that was a business that we chose to exit. And I would say the rest of the cross-border business, we have that same degree of optionality.

Got it. Okay. And then I know you mentioned that the revenue per piece will be down in the third quarter, is that something? Is that dynamic something that you would expect in the fourth quarter as well? Or do you think that at some point, you could start to see a reversal of that, or maybe just kind of flattening, given the new client wins and potential new client wins that you have in the pipeline?

I would say revenue per piece, quarter-to-quarter is a touch of a question for me right now. Obviously, so much of that depends on client dynamics, which clients are hitting the ball, what consumers are buying, et cetera. So - a little bit of I guess year-to-year I do expect that it will likely be down. Because some of the new clients, but again, if you look at RPP, revenue per piece decline in the second quarter, transportation costs decline the same amount. So, it's easy to over-rotate on one particular variable; you really got to look at the contribution margin. We look at a client basis. So looking at one variable without kind of looking at the attendant costs could lead you to the wrong conclusion.

Got it. Right. Well, thanks. I'll pass it on to the next caller. And best of luck.

Thank you.

Next we can go to Kartik Mehta with Northcoast Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Marc. I know we've had a lot of conversation about the cross-border business. And I'm wondering, do you think this is a secular issue for you? Is it temporary? So, right now, I know it's a drag, and I'm wondering if there's a way to reposition the business to make it profitable or do you just need volume? And maybe it's a temporary issue?

Yes, look, I think that's to be determined, in all candor. It is a business that's highly concentrated in customer relationships. As I said, it has evolved. Those dynamics, we don't expect to change, the issue around exchange rates to stabilize to touch, so that's a little bit less of a problem. So, I think it's a question mark of how that cross-border business evolves going forward. But again, I think it's easy to kind of over-rotate in cross-border. I would draw your attention back to the domestic parcel business. I mean, that's where the biggest chunk of the revenue is; if you look at the long-term plan, that's where all the incremental EBIT is. To your questions, the cross-border things will work themselves out one way or the other. We'll get that business moving forward or if not, I'm confident that it's got some backing in the marketplace.

And then Marc, I know one of the things that you were doing was automating a lot of the warehouses, a lot of those distribution facilities. Kind of where do you stand on that and obviously must be paying some dividends as you're seeing better. You're seeing lower unit costs?

Yes, I would say we are most redundant with the automation investments. We are in the process of deploying it. We had a great review with the team a couple of weeks ago. I would say we've got some sites that are aggressively deploying and using the new automation. We've got some that have some opportunities in front of them. But what I would say is that automation is producing the productivity that was contemplated in the business case when it is deployed as planned.

And Marc, just one last question, in today's environment where maybe the labor is still hard to get, and companies are looking to make their parcels or e-commerce a little bit more efficient. What are you hearing from customers? Or as your salespeople are brought, is your company looking to outsource that? Or is that attitude changing at all?

At first, I'm not sure I understood the question.

Just outsourcing all their parcel needs, coming to a company like you to say, 'Hi, take over the entire parcel shipment process for us?'

Well, and so - we provide a portion of the total logistics chain. So, we don't do the whole thing end-to-end. I would say mid-market customers are more interested in outsourcing; larger customers are a little bit more selective. I would say as you look at the benefits of our business model, I would point to a couple of things. One is the Postal Service's final mail delivery got terrific economics, and one that economics that others have a very hard time recreating. I would say as it relates to our capabilities in the middle, our unit costs, our labor costs are very, very competitive versus our competitors. And we're more flexible to deal with. So, we provide a nice veneer of economic capabilities for clients for middle mail to get parcels to the end of the Postal Service Network.

Thanks, Marc. I appreciate it.

Yes.

And we have time for one more question. We'll go to Matt Swope with Baird. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, Marc and Ana. Just one last from on GEC. You took out cross-border. Would Global Ecommerce have had positive EBITDA for the quarter?

Yes, I'm not going to get to that level of detail. What I would say, just reiterate, what I said is: if you take out cross-border, our performance in EBITDA would have been better.

Okay. Fair enough. And on one - I've asked you a couple of times before on the cash side. Could you characterize again, for us to make - you have about $560 million of cash and short-term investments? How much of that cash is available to you versus tied up in the bank or overseas, etc.?

Sure. So about a third of that is available to us as U.S. cash on hand, and then the rest is between the bank and international.

And so again, just being highly theoretical. If you chose to deploy all $200 million of that third, would you still be able to run the business? Or do you need to keep some of that cash around?

No, I need a good amount of that to run my working capital needs.

Got you. Okay. And then Marc, maybe back to the Board question. What is the cadence of meetings with the Board? When is your guys' next meeting or how often does that happen?

I would say it varies. I mean, we altered the Board schedule to accommodate the new Board members. I would say right now, they're maybe more frequently just because there's more coming up to speed. So, I'm not going to comment on the specific cadence per se. But I would say right now it's a very active and engaged Board.

No, that's fair. And then you can imagine that people are sort of interested in what might come out of that. Maybe to focus on the two other businesses just for a second. On the SendTech side, you showed nice profitability in the face of some revenue challenges still. Can you just talk a little bit about the profitability mix in SendTech and what we should expect on that going forward?

Sure. So the profitability we expect to continue at those margins that we're anticipating. From a revenue perspective, I touched on this during my remarks here. As we are now 63% through the IMI conversion, more of those new opportunities for clients that are coming up have a mix of renewal or an extension concept to their leases instead of a new product being put out because our product lasts longer than the four to five years. So, what we will see in the dynamics playing out is we will see less of the upfront, which comes with that original equipment sales and more a very good profit margin renewals coming through a stream revenue, and that flows better to the bottom line. So net-net, it's a very positive thing from the durability of those cash flows as we anticipate in the SendTech segment.

I'll give you the CES. I mean, we expect those margins to continue where they are through the long-term plan. So we just had all the businesses update their long-term plan, and the margins that we've experienced for the last five years are kind of like the margins we expect for the next five years.

So, we see the same kind of trend where maybe there's a little bit of pressure on the revenue side, but solid performance on the profitability side?

Correct.

That's great. And speaking of good profitability, the Presort numbers were exceedingly strong. Could you talk about sort of the same forward conversation about where revenue and where profitability goes in Presort?

Yes. Let me just make a connection. I think if you look at the Presort, they were absolutely terrific. To us, Presort in some ways is the poster child for Global Ecommerce. If you look at those two businesses and you substitute the word mail for parcels, they're fairly analogous. And candidly, if you look at the history of Presort over the last 15 years and as they build scale and as they've got more operational efficiency, you can see those margins improve. In terms of Presort going forward, last time we gave guidance around Presort, it was margins 15-plus percent. I still think that's the right basic ZIP code. We expect flat to slightly positive revenue growth there. So, it's a good business. And I would say there's opportunities certainly on the revenue side to do better than that. If there's some interesting acquisitions that become available and more customers decide to outsource, which is also possible in Bound & Packet Mail, and the market now continues to be great opportunities. I would say the rate case that the Postal Service passed in July is terrific for the marketplace, and it's reflective of the value that we provide, but that's a really important boost to our economics and our customers' economics going forward.

That's great. That's really helpful, Marc. Thank you.

Thank you.

And we can go to Peter Sakon with CreditSights. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Following up on the Presort business, can you talk about the - in the press release, the growth in the higher-yielding mail classes? Can you elaborate on what that means?

Sure. So inside of Presort, we have first-class mail, we have marketing mail, marketing mail flats. There are different classes. And first-class mail is the vast majority of what we process, and that is what mainly declines in that mid-single-digit range. On the other hand, we've been going into marketing mail and bounded print matter, which are classes of mail that are growing. They represent a small portion of the total at the moment, but we anticipate that growth to continue and help offset some of the first-class mail decline.

That's great. And can you talk about, you said that a lot of the investment has been done in automation. For CapEx in the quarter, what was it by division?

Sure. So what we've talked about is CapEx on a year-over-year basis is declining because the vast majority of our Global Ecommerce investments are done. So, I will tell you that about 40% of our total CapEx is attributable to Global Ecommerce. And then SendTech would be the next big one. Presort has done a lot of the refresh of these orders already. So I hope that gives you a little bit of a perspective.

Okay. And Marc, twice you said on the cross-border business, I think you said one way or the other. What is your sense of timing on resolution of that business?

Listen, I mean we're going to make a thoughtful decision on that business. I mean, I would say the Board and management continually look at the portfolio. So, it's not like it's a once-a-year thing. That's how we look at the portfolio all the time. And the decision that we'll make is what's the best way for first of all, the customers and the team and ultimately, our shareholders to move forward. So, I'm not going to box myself into a timeframe.

Okay. And I guess the last part on the cross-border. Given the negative EBITDA is you said its value in the marketplace. Is that, I guess, consistent? Or is it maybe more expensive to close it because otherwise, you would not have lost that EBITDA?

I didn't say it was negative EBITDA. I just said the decline in EBITDA surpassed the improvement in the other businesses.

Are you saying that cross-border business is EBITDA positive?

I didn't say it was negative.

And I'll turn the call back over to Mr. Lautenbach for any closing remarks.

Great. And thanks, everyone, for joining this morning. I want to go back to kind of the theme in my remarks. The second quarter played out largely as expected. It was consistent with the first quarter. So, not a lot of drama in the second quarter results. What I really like is how we're positioned going forward. We've been fighting through an interesting economic moment for the last candidly a couple of years since COVID. The fact that the broader economy affected supply chains and affected retail feels like we're getting on the tail end of that right now. And as we're coming out of that period, I like how we're positioned. Our costs and expenses are in good shape, with a good opportunity as we get into the second half that will make a meaningful difference. So, most of the cost and expense benefits are still in front of us, and we'll start to realize those in the second half. That's terrific. The Presort and SendTech, as I said, are well positioned in the second half of the year for continued good profit performance. That's important to the overall ballast of the enterprise, and it's also important for our cash. And as it relates to Global Ecommerce, the domestic parcel momentum is absolutely terrific, and we see that continuing. And again, we didn't get any questions, but there were some important adjustments that we made that will fortify the bank, the PB Bank going forward, but we're really excited about how the bank is well positioned. So, this economic moment that we're in is going to end, and the company is extremely well positioned on all fronts as we go forward. So with that, we'll close this morning's call, and we look forward to moving with you going forward. Thank you.

And that does conclude our conference for today. Thanks for your participation and for using AT&T Teleconference service. You may now disconnect.