Good afternoon, and welcome to SiTime's Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded today, Wednesday, November 6, 2024. I would now like to turn the call over to Brett Perry of Shelton Group Investor Relations. Brett, please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to SiTime's third quarter 2024 financial results conference call. Joining us on today's call from SiTime are Rajesh Vashist, Chief Executive Officer; and Beth Howe, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to point out that during the course of this call, the company may make forward-looking statements regarding expected future results, including financial position, strategy and plans, future operations, timing market and other areas of discussion. It's not possible for the company's management to predict all risks nor can the company assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed during this call may not occur, and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied. Neither the company nor any person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of forward-looking statements. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this call to conform statements to actual results or to changes in the company's expectations. For more detailed information on risks associated with the business, we refer you to the risk factors described in the 10-K filed on February 26, 2024, as well as the company's subsequent filings with the SEC. During the call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP measures, which are considered to be an important measure of company performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are provided in addition to and not as a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation includes stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, acquisition-related items, which include transaction and certain other cash costs associated with business acquisition as well as changes in estimated fair value of contingent consideration and earn out liabilities. Please refer to the Company's press release issued earlier today for a detailed reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. With that, it's now my pleasure to turn the call over to SiTime's CEO, Rajesh. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Brett. Good afternoon. I'd like to welcome new as well as existing investors to SiTime's Q3 2024 earnings call. SiTime is the leader in a dynamic new semiconductor category that we call precision timing, which is the heartbeat of modern electronics. Whether it is AI datacenters, networking infrastructure, automated vehicles, personal mobility, or IoT, SiTime's precision timing delivers better performance and reliability. This precision timing uses semiconductor technology to reimagine time and transform the $10 billion timing market. Our third quarter results demonstrate broad strength across financial metrics, customer segments, and regions. Revenue for the quarter grew by 62% to $57.7 million, and net income increased to 17% of revenue. Each of our customer segments and regions continued at least double-digit growth, with Communications Enterprise and Data Center, Greater China, and EMEA all growing at triple digits. Bookings for the fourth quarter are strong, and we expect Q4 to grow sequentially as previously forecasted. Looking back, November 2024 marks our fifth year as a public company. At the time of our IPO, SiTime made a commitment to building high-value timing products for high-growth applications and markets, and we have delivered significantly. We have built high-growth, high-margin businesses with a diversity of revenue, customers, and applications. Since markets grow at different rates and on different timelines, we believe that this diversity benefits SiTime and makes us a unique semiconductor company. Our Communications Enterprise Data Center business demonstrates the value of our products. In both Q2 and Q3 2024, this business has been a major driver of our growth, driven by cloud service provider investments in AI infrastructure. CED revenue grew over 200% year-over-year in Q3, and for FY 2024, it will more than double. Looking forward into 2025, we believe that the AI market will continue to grow as newer generations of AI servers and networking equipment are rolled out. We expect CED to continue to lead SiTime growth next year. In AI datacenter infrastructure, SiTime's products are solving difficult timing problems in applications such as top-of-the-rack switches and optical modules. Additionally, cloud service providers are investing in improving bandwidth and GPU utilization in the datacenter, which we believe results in more use of precision timing solutions with higher dollar content per application. SiTime's precision timing plays in high-speed connectivity applications such as active electrical cables. We provide high performance that is virtually immune to noise in a very small form factor, which is valuable in these cases. Another application is the direct connectivity between GPUs, through a very fast dedicated switch, which improves GPU utilization rates with faster parallel processing of the AI workloads. Our clock generators acquired from Aura play a key role here as well, delivering multiple high-performance clocks from a single integrated device. In summary, we are in a leadership position in AI with precision timing and expect to grow our dollar content as this market grows. Another macro trend is in building a more precise global navigation satellite system that is resilient to jamming and spoofing. Such a system has use cases in defense and aerospace and extends to industrial, automotive, and mobile IoT consumer. In automotive, ADAS level 2, level 3, and 4, as well as robo-taxis need such enhanced GNSS to operate optimally. Such a GNSS depends on precision timing, and we are engaged with key players in multiple markets. In autonomous and ADAS vehicles, we are now also offering fail-safe technology, where the single device integrates resonators, oscillators, clocking, and advanced safety mechanisms for timing. This integration accelerates functional safety development and simplifies system architecture. We have multiple design wins with key electric vehicle companies and expect to begin shipments in volume quantities in 2025. In summary, our strategy is working as intended and delivering results. I'm confident about our first success now and in the future. I'd now like to turn the call over to Beth, our CFO to discuss our financial results in more detail.

Thanks, Rajesh, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, I'll discuss the details of our third quarter results and provide our outlook for the fourth quarter. As a reminder, I'll focus my discussion on the non-GAAP financial results, which are reconciled to GAAP in our press release. We are pleased with our third quarter financial results, as we continue to execute our financial model. We drove strong sequential and year-over-year revenue growth, expanding non-GAAP operating profit and earnings per share over twice as fast as revenue, while continuing to invest in our leading product roadmap. Our financial performance this quarter demonstrates our ability to successfully invest in our business while delivering strong financial results. Third quarter revenue was $57.7 million, up 62% year-on-year, driven by increased volumes and favorable product mix. Looking at growth by market, sales into our communications, enterprise, and data center market were $19.7 million or 34% of sales, up 233% year-on-year. Sales into the automotive, industrial, and aerospace market were $17.7 million or 31% of sales, increasing 51% year-on-year. And sales into the mobile, IoT, and consumer market were $20.3 million or 35% of sales, up 14% year-on-year, with sales to our largest customer totaling $13.1 million or 23% of sales. Non-GAAP gross margins were 58.1%, up 40 basis points sequentially, driven primarily by improved manufacturing absorption from higher volumes. Total non-GAAP operating expenses for the quarter were $29.5 million, with R&D expense of $17.1 million and SG&A expense of $12.4 million. Operating expenses were lower than expected, primarily related to the shift of R&D expense from Q3 to Q4. Q3 marked the return to operating profitability with non-GAAP operating profit of $4 million, a significant improvement of $9.7 million versus the prior year, and representing 75% flow-through of gross profit dollars. Third quarter non-GAAP net income was $9.6 million, representing 17% of revenue or $0.40 per share. Turning to the balance sheet. Accounts receivable was $30.2 million, with Days Sales Outstanding of 47 days. Inventory at the end of the quarter was $71.9 million, and accounts payable was $17.9 million. During the quarter, we generated $8.2 million in cash from operations, invested $15 million in capital purchases and paid $12.9 million to Aura as part of the transaction we announced last year. We ended the quarter with $435 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. Let me now review our outlook for the December quarter. In Q4, we expect revenue of $63 million to $65 million, non-GAAP gross margins to be in the range of 58% to 58.5%, non-GAAP operating expenses of $31 million to $31.5 million, interest income of approximately $4.5 million, and diluted outstanding shares of approximately 24.4 million shares. As a result, we expect non-GAAP EPS to be in the range of $0.39 to $0.45 per share. In closing, we are pleased with our strong results and remain focused on driving revenue and profit growth. Our product portfolio continues to expand with differentiated products that address large and growing markets, and our customers are clearly recognizing our value proposition. All in all, we are executing our strategy, and our strategy is working. With that, I'd like to hand the call back to the operator for questions and answers.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Sujeeva De Silva at Roth Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi, Rajesh. Hi, Beth. Congrats on the progress here. Maybe you can talk about the data center market, Rajesh, the content here. I'm curious, optical top rack switch versus expanding into AECs. It sounds like you have some content in the AI server or somewhere in the rack, other places, and you can elaborate on that maybe. What's the mix of those today, and what's the mix of those content positions maybe one to two years out, maybe some of those are growth opportunities?

Yes. Thank you for that. We see that all of these will continue to grow over time. The tricky part is forecasting how they are configured. But, in general, we're talking about in the next few years seeing that server content grows quite substantially, where we see particularly large content growth is in the switches and some of the CPU servers as well as the pluggables. So, I think we see growth all across the market, depending upon the configuration of these systems.

Okay. And maybe just a follow-up there. I know you've started off with strong traction in the optical pluggables. And, I'm wondering, is there a multiplier of content to think about for a server switch or CPU server versus a pluggable, or are they similar content-wise for your opportunity?

The pluggable is probably the least in dollar amount. But, the switches, the servers, the GPUs, of course, they all go up quite a bit. We do have Super NIC cards, which are used for compute, those that are used for storage. So, depending upon, again, it's a pretty complicated architecture, but those are all important places for SiTime's sales and revenue.

Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton of Needham and Company. Quinn, your line is now open.

Hey, guys. Congratulations on the nice results and outlook. I wanted to follow up on Suji's question. Rajesh, you I think perhaps mentioned GPU-to-GPU networks or others may know them as the scale-up networks in AI being particularly content-rich for your TCXOs. Wondering if you could just dive a little deeper into what the content could be in those scale-up networks. If you look at NVIDIA's latest generation NBL 72 rack, 9 of the 27 trays in that rack are dedicated to switching and there's a lot of content to be had there. And it sounds like those switch trays could potentially use multiple TCXOs from the company. And so just wondering if you could kind of expand on the use cases. And are these scale-up networks specifically with NVIDIA, or are you seeing scale-up opportunities with some of the hyperscalers that are developing their own ASICs? Thanks.

Yes. While I can't mention specific customers, we haven't significantly penetrated the hyperscaler market. We have made progress with some, but not across the board. Most of our advancements are within the CPU and GPU sectors. Initially, we were looking at costs under $100 per rack a couple of years ago, but now fully equipped racks cost several hundred dollars. Even less populated racks still fall in that pricing range. We are discussing costs in the high hundreds, potentially slightly more, depending on whether we are referring to GPU trays, NIC cards for storage compute, or switches, including top-of-the-rack switches, and SiTime is involved in all these areas. Moreover, we are actively engaged with a wide array of OEMs in pluggable modules and with AECs. Some AEC companies are performing quite well, and I know you track them. This is all part of a comprehensive strategy, which contributes to the impressive year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth of 200% that we experienced.

And Rajesh, just to confirm that, that high hundreds of dollars per rack, that's across all applications that would include AECs, pluggables, top rack switches, scale-up switches, and cheaper NIC cards, like everything you do.

Yes. I'm aggregating all of that because, yes, it's a little bit tricky, and I don't think it should be that specific.

Yes. Understand the customer sensitivity there. I guess the next question, CED was up over 200% in the quarter; it will double in '24 versus '23. I know you're not giving guidance for '25 yet, but what kind of growth rate do you expect in 2025 out of CED? I think you said in the prepared comments that CED would again lead the growth. So, I assume, if you're targeting 30% overall for the company that CED is probably going to be well in excess of 30% next year. Is that kind of the right framework to be thinking about for 2025?

Yes. As you recall, Quinn, several quarters ago, we took the unusual step of forecasting that we would grow by give or take 30%, and it looks like we're on target to do that for this year. We also took the sort of unusual step a quarter ago of saying that this growth of approximately 30% would carry on into the coming year and the year beyond. We still maintain that. I think it's fair to say that given the diversity of our revenue, which is a strength of the company, there's always something that's growing at more than the corporate growth rate. And I think in this case, CED qualifies for that, because there's also something on the other side, which is not growing at a corporate growth rate. So, I think it balances itself out nicely, so that we can deliver the promised 30%.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Melissa Fairbanks at Raymond James and Associates. Your line is now open.

Hi, guys. I'll add my congratulations. I have a couple of questions for Beth actually to start. I'm surprised normally this is the first question that gets asked. Are you able to give us any sort of specificity on segment guidance for the fourth quarter? Obviously, CED is going to lead the growth, but any kind of color that you can give us on the other segments?

Sure. As we look at the segments again, we expect growth in CED to lead the way. I think, if you look at our Consumer IoT Mobile segment, that as well, right, we've got holiday season that should show good growth as well. And then, as we look at the auto, industrial, aerospace, we expect that to continue to grow as well. That's had some strong performance this year. But I'd say, again, growing across the board, but CED definitely leading the way.

Okay, great. And then as a follow-up, maybe I know this is like way less boring or way more boring than talking about CED, but on the OpEx line, understand that some of the R&D got pushed to the December quarter. I think in our prior conversations, maybe we talked about going forward, maybe a couple million dollars a year in OpEx growth, and then that drives a lot of leverage on the model. What are you thinking now that you've got all of these new opportunities? Should we expect a greater increase in OpEx, or how should we be modeling OpEx going forward?

So, we look at Q4, I'm expecting OpEx to be kind of $31 million to $31.5 million for the quarter. So that's for Q4. And then I think what you're asking is looking forward into 2025 and how to think about that. So, if you annualize that number, you get to $124 million, $125 million as kind of a baseline. And then, I think, again, we'll grow a bit from there. As we've been talking about, I expect that revenue to grow much, much faster than OpEx, but we do want to be investing in the business. We want to be investing in R&D. We want to be investing in go-to-market. So, for those key growth areas and we see a good ROI on investment, whether it's people or programs, we're going to make those investments. But again, as I said, I expect revenue to grow much faster than OpEx.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Tore Svanberg of Stifel. Your line is now open, Tore.

Yes, good afternoon. This is Jeremy on for Tore. And let me add my congratulations to a very strong quarter and outlook. Wanted to dig a little bit more deeply into the automotive segment. I know software-defined vehicles is something that's kind of been coming on pretty strong lately in the industry. I was wondering if you could give us more insight into your timing content and how it plays into the opportunity there. And how does that compare to legacy or more traditional vehicles in terms of your potential content and potential TAM? That would be great. Thank you.

Yes. So, starting with the Serviceable Available Market, we probably have something like about $400 million to $500 million in the automotive market, which is up substantially from the time when we went public, when it was almost negligible. Most of the business that we have comes from the more innovative car companies, which tend to be electric vehicles, although it's not limited to that. We're not connected to that, but many of them are significantly EVs. So, with that in mind, we do rather well in China, where, as you know, there's a lot of automated driving and new car companies that have really ramped up volumes. We have done well in the United States with those electric car companies that have done well. In terms of use case, the use case is mostly centered around automated driving, whether it is the full Advanced Driver Assistance Systems at level 2 or level 2.5 or design wins at level 3 and level 4, but also in the cameras or the sensors or the radar, the lidar, and the GPS that connect some of these to positioning. So, it's really mostly in that ecosystem. Although I will say that we are also in infotainment, we are also in some of the Ethernet cabling and so on. So, it's a pretty diverse use case, but it's mostly centered around automated driving. And as I mentioned with our new fail-safe technology, which is getting rolled out right now, we are likely to be used in other cars that want to increase the safety of their operation.

Thank you for that information. I would like to discuss the precision timing market in comparison to quartz. Could you provide an update on your penetration rates, especially regarding new or emerging applications? Additionally, it would be helpful if you could differentiate between high performance areas and those you are not focusing on. How is your adoption rate in precision timing versus quartz? Also, how does programmability influence customer decisions? Thank you.

Our total addressable market is $10 billion, which includes $4 billion for oscillators and around $2 billion for clocks, totaling $6 billion. The remainder comprises resonators, even though we currently don't have resonator products in the market. However, we have offerings in the other two categories. Our addressable market is approximately $3 billion, and our revenue is slightly below $200 million, as many of you have forecasted. This means our penetration in the precision timing market is in the $3 billion range, with substantial potential for growth from $200 million. The factors contributing to that $3 billion include strong performance in data centers, important enterprise technologies, and communications, which likely account for about $1 billion. Additionally, we have a substantial presence in the consumer and mobile IoT business. Other segments include military, aerospace, defense, industrial, and medical sectors. We estimate our automotive market to be around $0.5 billion. Overall, this aggregates to about $3 billion, consisting of around 300 applications within that market. It’s a diverse business strategy that we believe strengthens the company while aiming for annual growth of 30%.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton of Needham and Company. Quinn, your line is now open.

Hey, a quick follow-up for Beth. Beth, I think last quarter you'd mentioned the gross margin was sort of weighed down by some new investments in tooling. Obviously, you guys have done a really nice job here in the near term, delivering higher-than-expected revenue. Just kind of wondering if you might be able to give us your latest thoughts on gross margin, what the trajectory might look like beyond the December quarter into March? Would you see a seasonal downtick as revenue may decline seasonally? And then any thoughts on when you can get back to that 60% or higher gross margin target? Thank you.

Sure, Quinn. Let me talk a little bit about our gross margin. As you said, we did see some good improvement sequentially, 40 basis points. And I'd say we're on track with where we expected to be, as we ramp these new products and bring them into production. Long-term, we still expect to be north of 60%. And in fact, if we continue on track as we expect, we would be getting back to kind of that 60% mark by probably the second half of 2025 as we get these products into production and really ramping there. Again, I think we're on track with where we expected to be. We've seen nice improvement here sequentially. To your point, we typically see a seasonal decline Q4 to Q1. I think the average is roughly 20% seasonal decline in revenue, and so that's a little bit of a headwind there just for the March quarter. But long-term, even into 2025, I think we're on track with where we want to be.

Our next question comes from Chris Caso of Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Yes, thank you. Good evening. I wonder if you could talk a little about your penetration or your attempt to penetrate the clock market in terms of the timing of that, and what sort of magnitude of benefit do you expect as you start to penetrate that? And is it really a function of just the pace of product development there? How quickly can you get products out into the market for that segment?

Yes. Thanks, Chris. Actually, the pace of this is predicated by the design win and the deployment of the products, because of the Aura acquisition, we now have significant number of the products that we want. There's still some in the pipeline that are getting rolled out, but most of the products are already out and getting design wins. So, what is predicting that rollout is the design win, which takes anywhere from 9 months because a lot of these go into CED markets, industrial markets, and automotive markets, which have about 9 months to 12 months design win and then another equal number of months for the rollout of the product in volume, so call it two years. So because of that, we think we are very much on target with both our organic growth products in clocking, like the Corus product that we launched recently, but also with the Aura-based products, such that our revenue over the coming years, coming few years, not a long time, we expect to be from clocking to reach about $100 million, and we are well on that trajectory, even though the revenue from clocking is still relatively small this year and in fact, next year as well.

That's helpful. Thank you. As a follow-up one for you, Beth, and I guess you've been there a bit of a while now. Luckily, it appears that the market has now stabilized. So, we have a better idea of what we're dealing with here. What's your view of the margin structure for the company and kind of where you'd like to see it? And how should we think of, not just for the next few quarters, but a little longer out, how we should think about OpEx growth relative to revenue growth and what sort of operating leverage we should see as the revenue grows?

Thank you, Chris. As I reflect on our operating model, we haven't provided guidance for 2025 yet. However, I believe we can grow revenue significantly faster than our operating expenses, especially given our recent performance and the OpEx we brought into 2024. This quarter, we demonstrated a 75% conversion of gross profit to net income, showcasing our strong operating leverage. While we plan to invest in OpEx strategically where we see a solid return on investment, I still anticipate that our revenue will outpace OpEx growth in 2025. We may increase investments in the future, but for now, I expect continued flow-through and operating leverage in our model.

I am showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back to management for closing remarks.

Thank you very much. We are very glad that we've returned to a growth rate, and it's good to be here, and we look forward to talking to you in further detail as the quarters roll on. Thank you very much.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.