Hello, and thank you for being here. My name is Bella, and I will be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to STERIS plc's second quarter Fiscal 2026 Earnings Conference Call. I will now hand the conference over to Julie Winter, Vice President of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, Bella, and good morning, everyone. Speaking on today's call this morning will be Karen Burton, Senior Vice President and CFO; and Dan Carestio, our President and CEO. And I do have a few words of caution before we open for comments. This webcast contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today. Any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of this call without the express written consent of STERIS is strictly prohibited. Some of the statements made during this review are or may be considered forward-looking statements. Many important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those risk factors described in STERIS' securities filings. The company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments. STERIS' SEC filings are available through the company and on our website. In addition, on today's call, non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted earnings per diluted share, adjusted operating income, constant currency organic revenue growth, and free cash flow will be used. Additional information regarding these measures, including definitions, is available in our press release as well as reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures are presented during this call with the intent of providing greater transparency to supplemental financial information used by management and the Board of Directors in their financial analysis and operational decision-making. With those cautions, I will hand the call over to Karen.

Thank you, Julie, and good morning, everyone. It is my pleasure to be with you this morning to review the highlights of our second quarter performance from continuing operations. For the second quarter, total as-reported revenue grew 10%. Constant currency organic revenue grew 9% in the quarter, driven by volume as well as 210 basis points of price. Gross margin for the quarter increased 60 basis points compared with the prior year to 44.3%. Positive price and productivity, primarily driven by volume, more than offset increased inflation and tariff costs. EBIT margin increased 90 basis points to 23.1% of revenue compared with the second quarter last year, mainly driven by operating expense leverage. The adjusted effective tax rate in the quarter was 24.5%. The year-over-year increase was driven primarily by changes in discrete item adjustments and geographic mix. Net income from continuing operations in the quarter was $244.5 million. Adjusted earnings per diluted share from continuing operations were $2.47, a 15% increase over the prior year. Capital expenditures for the first half of fiscal 2026 totaled $180.1 million, and depreciation and amortization totaled $241.1 million. We ended the quarter with $1.9 billion in total debt. Gross to EBITDA at quarter end was approximately 1.2x. Free cash flow for the first half of fiscal 2026 was $527.7 million, a very strong start to the year, driven by the increase in earnings and improvements in working capital. With that, I will now turn the call over to Dan for his remarks.

Thanks, Karen, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to hear more about our second quarter and our increased outlook. Karen covered the quarter at a high level, so I will add some commentary on the segments. Starting with Healthcare. Constant currency organic revenue grew 9% in the second quarter, with growth across all categories. Service continued its streak of outperformance, growing 13% in the second quarter. Consumables also performed well with growth of 10%. Healthcare capital equipment revenue increased 4% in the quarter with a backlog of over $400 million. Orders were up 3% year-to-date and down slightly in the second quarter. EBIT margins for Healthcare in the quarter increased 100 basis points to 25.1%, with volume, pricing, positive productivity, and restructuring program benefits offsetting tariffs and inflation. Turning to AST. Constant currency organic revenue grew 7% for the quarter with 13% growth in services, offset by anticipated declines in capital equipment revenue. Services benefited from stable medical device volumes, bioprocessing demand, and currency. EBIT margins for AST were 45.3%, up 250 basis points from the second quarter last year as additional volume, pricing, and less capital equipment in the mix were able to more than offset increases in labor and energy. Constant currency organic revenue increased 12% for Life Sciences in the quarter, driven by a return of capital equipment shipments with growth of 39%. Service revenues grew 9% and consumables increased 7%. Capital equipment backlog was up over 50% to $114 million. Margins declined 70 basis points as volume and price were more than offset by tariffs and inflation. From an earnings perspective, we grew the bottom line 15% in the quarter to $2.47 per diluted share. Included in that number is approximately $12 million of pretax tariff impact, which primarily impacted our Healthcare segment. Turning to our outlook for fiscal 2026. As noted in the press release, based on our first half outperformance and expectations for the balance of the year, we are increasing most elements of our outlook. We now anticipate approximately 8% to 9% as-reported revenue growth, which reflects about 100 basis points of favorable currency, a significantly lower impact than we anticipated last quarter. Making up for the shift in currency impact, constant currency organic revenue growth is now expected to be 7% to 8%, an increase of 100 basis points from our prior outlook. This improvement was driven by our first half outperformance. We now expect all three segments to grow 7% to 8% on a constant currency organic basis for the year. For AST, we now expect services to grow 9% to 10%, which will be offset by anticipated declines in capital equipment, particularly versus the tough comparisons in the fourth quarter. We are also increasing our earnings outlook with a new range of $10.15 to $10.30. For your modeling purposes, we now expect EBIT margins to improve 10 to 20 basis points in fiscal 2026. This will be partially offset by a 50 basis point increase in our anticipated effective tax rate of approximately 24%. We are also increasing our outlook for free cash flow by $30 million to $850 million for fiscal 2026. CapEx remains unchanged at about $375 million. We are pleased with our strong start to the year, and we are confident in our ability to meet these revised expectations. That concludes our prepared remarks for the call. Julie, would you please give the instructions so that we can begin the Q&A.

Thank you, Karen and Dan, for your comments. Bella, can you please give the instructions for Q&A, and we can get started.

Your first question comes from the line of Brett Fishbin with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Just wanted to start on AST. I was curious if you guys could comment a little bit on what drove the second consecutive quarter of double-digit growth in services. And then just how you're thinking about sustainability of trends in that area going forward?

Yes. Thanks, Brett. This is Dan. I think it's more of the same. We continue to see pretty stable volume from our medtech customers. We continue to see recovery in bioprocessing, which was a negative drain on us for some quarters a year or so ago. And in addition to that, we've had a number of expansions going into place over the last four years. And that investment is facilitating our growth. So we're very confident in the 9% to 10% outlook that we have going forward. There's still a little noise out there. We have seen some juxtaposition of customer volume in terms of manufacturing location, but not in a real meaningful way. So we feel pretty good about our global footprint and how that facilitates those needs.

All right. Perfect. And then just one more for me. I think in the press release, you mentioned that operating margins took a step up despite several headwinds. I think you mentioned tariffs and inflation on the call today. Maybe if you could just touch on any other items that you might have been referring to? And then how much of an offset you're kind of viewing those collective headwinds against the underlying margin expansion?

So as you noted, we are referring to tariffs and inflation, both labor and material.

Okay. Sorry, is there like any way to maybe approximate like how much those headwinds represented as an offset in the quarter to margins?

Tariffs in the quarter were 90 basis points, and material and labor inflation was about 130 basis points across the company.

Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Wood with Morgan Stanley.

Beautiful. Two quick ones. I guess, the first one, Healthcare on the service side also was very strong. What are you seeing there? Could you unpack that a little bit for us?

Yes, there are a few points to mention. Our service business in Healthcare primarily consists of our traditional rental service for equipment and installation work that accompanies our capital offerings. However, a significant portion also comes from our IMS repair business and instrument processing, where we function as a service provider. Volumes have been robust, and we've experienced strong performance over the last five or six quarters with double-digit growth. As we've indicated, this sector of our business has allowed us to increase pricing, which has been possible due to substantial labor cost increases over recent years. However, as those costs have begun to stabilize, we anticipate a slight decrease in growth rates from 12% to 13% to something lower. At the same time, we expect to see a corresponding slowdown in labor costs. Therefore, while growth may moderate, it should not impact our overall margins significantly.

I got you. That makes sense. I guess one more, which is basically like on the modality side like X-ray, could you give us a sense of how that's contributed to growth? It's obviously an exciting modality.

Yes, we're very excited about it. We don't break out the technologies. It will become just a math exercise that we'd have to keep up with, which isn't worth pursuing. We view radiation as one technology and consider dose as dose. We use gamma, e-beam, and x-ray. While we are incredibly excited about x-ray and it plays a significant role in our expansion capacity, it's just one tool in our toolkit.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Bednar with Piper Sandler.

Congrats on another strong quarter here. I heard you on the updated outlook for the segment, and I appreciate the breakout of the service growth in AST. Wondering if you're willing to give maybe a similar perspective on the outlook for some of those Healthcare subsegments. Dan, I just heard you on service there, maybe detailing a little bit as maybe price comes off. But what about like consumables versus equipment? Any way to give a little bit of color there, rack and stack, help service top, consumables next, equipment bottom on kind of the growth. Anything there would be great.

Yes, you can analyze our consumable business based on the market share we've gained historically and the procedure rate. I expect this trend of strong performance to continue. Currently, we have a significant backlog in Healthcare capital, exceeding $400 million, and our order rate remains robust. This primarily hinges on the timing of shipments. We feel optimistic about the next two quarters, although we will face some challenging comparisons in Healthcare capital. While it's difficult to provide specific predictions, we are confident in our position. If forced to rank them, I would say service is likely at the top, followed by consumables, with capital growing and remaining somewhat unpredictable in terms of timing.

Okay. That's very helpful. And then, Karen, you're already at $530 million in free cash flow this year. Really impressive so far, but you typically generate far more free cash in the second half of your fiscal years. So is this just an abnormal year? When I look at your updated guidance, I like the raise, but is this just an abnormal year where you get more cash generation in the front end of the year and you've maybe had some things shift out of second half or pulled forward from second half into first half? Or is the guidance just really conservative here for the full year?

We have observed stronger cash flow in the first half of the year than usual. One factor contributing to this is the earnings being slightly pulled forward into the first half. Additionally, we have seen significant improvements in working capital and quicker collections on shipments that were delayed in fiscal year 2025. Therefore, the reasons for this include earlier stronger earnings, improvements in working capital, and a degree of caution.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Matson with Needham.

So just in terms of the Healthcare business, I mean, I know you kind of broke it out into the capital service and consumables. But I'm just wondering if you could give us any more detail around geographies, types of customers, hospitals versus ASCs, product lines, et cetera, that are driving the growth there. Is it pretty strong across the board? Are there any areas of those things where you would call out you're seeing particular strength?

Not really. I mean, we're seeing pretty good strength across the globe in terms of geographic and there still seems to be a lot of procedures going on and particularly strong in the U.S. more so than other places, but we're starting to see recovery in other places as well. So no, there's nothing I would call out specifically.

Okay. And then for AST, can you just give us an update on your capacity there? And are you currently capacity constrained? And if so, how fast can you address this? I think you've said earlier in this call that you are expanding capacity there.

Yes. It's a long process to expand capacity. In AST, from the time we decided to build a plant at the time it's operational, it can be 2 to 3 years. So we have a number of expansions that have been completed. We have a number that are in process, and we have a number that are planned out into the future. And we've been pretty steadily bringing new capacity into the market now for the last eight years. So we're in a good position in most geographies, if not all geographies of the world right now in terms of where we've added capacity to facilitate plants that are nearing their limit of capacity.

Your last question comes from the line of Michael Polark with Wolfe Research.

I will say I forget what the record is for prepared remarks, but 9 minutes was pretty good again. So kudos. I got two big picture ones. Life Sciences, some growth mojo back, 12% in the quarter. Obviously, the comps are easy and capital equipment is up big off of a low base, but nevertheless, 12%. My question is thematic, this notion of reshoring, hearing about a little bit pharmas biotechs bringing, their manufacturing partners bringing manufacturing back towards the U.S. What do you think on this? Do you see any evidence that it's helpful so far here, anecdote that it could be helpful for you? What is the state of this theme for your exposure in this space?

Thanks, Michael. Yes, generally whenever we see our large pharmaceutical customers moving or expanding their manufacturing capacity, whether in new locations or existing sites, it usually indicates positive prospects for our capital equipment business. There is likely more perception than reality regarding the current level of redistribution or construction in the pharmaceutical sector, but it does exist and is genuine. I believe we may be experiencing some benefits from this in terms of our capital equipment linked to GMP and pharmaceuticals. Additionally, as you mentioned, we are comparing against periods when there was virtually no activity in the pharmaceutical sector for nearly 18 months.

The other one is in Healthcare, and I've been asked this once or twice a year for a good number of years running, but it's the topic of single-use scopes. And obviously, this is a function of your Cantel exposure. Like what is the state of that trend today? Has it really not lived up to what was once believed to be high expectations or those products are getting some traction? It's just small and therefore, not all that significant. I know once upon a time, not long ago, you talked about launching your own single-use scope. Maybe that's been a helpful offset. But what are you seeing there over the last year or two? And what's on the horizon over the next year or two?

Yes. I think what I would convey, and what we've consistently communicated, is that there is a role for single-use scopes, particularly with small diameter scopes. This includes hysteroscopy, ureteroscopes, various nasogastric scopes, and bronchoscopes. However, the majority of our business at STERIS focuses on large diameter scopes used for colonoscopies. The rationale for small diameter scopes lies in their cost—both their failure rates and the expense to repair them are relatively high, whereas large diameter scopes tend to be more durable and have a longer lifespan, despite their higher initial cost. We have always maintained that there is a place for certain disposable products. Many disposable scope manufacturers are primarily targeting the small diameter scopes, and some have even stated that they are not concentrating on large diameter scopes for colonoscopy at all.

That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back over to Julie Winter for closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for taking the time to join us this morning to learn more about our performance in the quarter and our outlook for the year. We look forward to seeing many of you on the road later this.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you all for joining, and you may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.