Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the SWK Holdings First Quarter 2024 Conference Call. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host, Jason Rando. Sir, the floor is yours.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining SWK Holdings First Quarter 2024 Financial and Corporate Results Call. Yesterday evening, SWK Holdings issued a press release detailing its financial results for the 3 months ended March 31, 2024. The press release can be found in the Investor Relations section of swkhold.com under News Releases. Before beginning today's call, I would like to make the following statement regarding forward-looking statements. Today, we'll be making certain forward-looking statements about future expectations, plans, events, and circumstances including statements about our strategy, future operations, and our expectations regarding our capital allocation and cash resources. These statements are based on our current expectations, and you should not place undue reliance on these statements. Actual results may differ materially due to our risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in the Risk Factors section of SWK Holdings 10-K filed with the SEC and other filings we make with the SEC from time to time. SWK Holdings disclaims any obligation to update information contained in these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Joining me from SWK Holdings on today's call is Jody Staggs, President and CEO, who will provide an update on SWK's first quarter 2024 corporate and financial results. Jody, go ahead.

Thank you, Jason, and thanks, everyone, for joining our first quarter conference call. SWK's first quarter of 2024 results were highlighted by a 24% growth in Finance segment revenue to a near all-time high of $11.5 million, while our Enteris segment signed an exclusive option and purchase agreement with a strategic partner that reduces the operating burn and may lead to the acquisition of certain CDMO-related tangible assets. SWK's core business is financing commercial stage life science product companies through first lien term loans and royalties with a focus on $5 million to $25 million investments. We have concentrated on this niche for over a decade and have developed an extensive network and strong experience, spanning the three core functions of a direct credit firm, origination, underwriting, and portfolio management. These capabilities were evidenced during the first quarter as our Finance segment generated a 10.3% year-over-year increase in gross finance receivables portfolio to $274.5 million, coupled with a 14.2% effective yield and 16.3% realized yield. These achievements led to a 24% year-over-year increase in segment revenue to $11.5 million. This performance enabled our Finance segment to remain profitable in the quarter, generating $1 million of GAAP net income and $2.7 million of adjusted non-GAAP net income despite being negatively impacted by a $6 million impairment in our loan book. We are constructive on the life science finance market and are actively pursuing multiple loan and royalty opportunities while remaining cognizant of increased competition in certain pockets of the life science finance market. While many of our competitors have grown to a size where they must focus on large sponsor-backed opportunities, we believe SWK's focus on the less competitive sub-$25 million market remains a competitive differentiator. During the first quarter, our Enteris division signed an exclusive option and asset purchase agreement with a strategic partner, granting the partner a two-year exclusive option to purchase certain Enteris tangible assets in exchange for option fees and guaranteed revenue payments. In April, we received the first low single-digit million-dollar option fee. The guaranteed revenue payments are due every six months, and we expect to receive the first guaranteed revenue payment in the third quarter. Our first quarter financial results did not include any revenue from either the option fee or guaranteed revenue payments. As we highlighted on our fourth quarter call, the agreement immediately reduces the cash burn on Enteris, and we believe the business will be breakeven or better over the duration of the agreement. The agreement also provides our colleagues at Enteris opportunities to work with our partner to increase the project pipeline and generate new business, while allowing SWK to prioritize our specialty finance business focused on investing in small and midsized commercial stage life science companies. Turning to our share repurchase program, we bought back 58,298 shares at a total cost of $1 million during the quarter. Since quarter close, we repurchased an additional 19,000 shares for a total cost of $300,000. At March 31, 2024, our book value per share was $22.46, a 5% increase compared to $21.39 in the year-ago period. Non-GAAP tangible financing book value per share totaled $19.69, an approximately 17% increase from the year-ago period. For the first quarter of 2024, the realized yield of the finance receivables portfolio was 16.3% versus approximately 15% for the same period in the prior year. In summary, the first quarter of 2024 was largely as expected with the exception of the $6 million loan impairment. For the remainder of 2024, we will prioritize selectively closing commercial stage life science loan and royalty transactions that fit our underwriting criteria, working with our non-accrual borrower partners to realize positive outcomes, exploring paths for additional capital, and returning capital to shareholders via our buyback program. With that, let's open the call to questions.

Your first question is from Mark Argentino from Lake Street.

Jody, just a couple of quick ones. One, could you just touch on the impairment? What was it? And then two, what's your kind of lending base or capacity right now?

Yes. Thanks, Mark. Yes. So the impairment was to our Trio loan, which was carried at $9.6 million at December 30. Yes, the situation remains in work out, there is a restructuring ongoing. So we remain positive towards the potential outcome here, but I think the restructuring happened a little quicker than we would have thought. It was a little bit more rushed than we would have thought. And as the business goes through that, there's likely to be some disruptions. Given that our structure under the restructuring, we felt this impairment was appropriate. As we get a little further out from it, we'll do a full write-up and analysis of what happened here. It was a U.K. borrower. We've only done a few of those. I think we need to do a deep dive and understand if that played a role here. There are some other dynamics that, I think, in my mind, happened, and we'll definitely use this as a learning experience. In terms of our lending capacity, as we stand today, the revolver is undrawn. I think we've got a few million dollars of cash. So we have plenty of capacity, let's say, $50 million to $50 million. We've got some undrawn commitments and things like that. But we're in the $45 million to $50 million range of capacity. I was talking to the team yesterday about what we've done year-to-date, and I think we would have liked to have closed some deals. We actually have submitted about $200 million of proposals year-to-date, which is up year-over-year, and we have about $60 million of proposals outstanding. So I think we're running our playbook. We're out there originating, we're out there finding potential partners, and we're out there submitting proposals. The market has turned a bit more competitive, and that's both the general dynamic of a new player or two in the market, plus with equity markets moving higher, that's an alternative for some of these companies. I don't think we're going to be doing anything drastically different, but I've sort of challenged the team to think through our process, our proposals, and other things we should be doing differently, are we out there hustling every day making sure that we're staying in front of these companies and putting the best proposal forward to get some closings.

That's helpful. And then has any of your portfolio companies accessed the equity markets in terms of raising additional equity capital? Or how do you guys view broader capital markets right now?

Yes. Yes. So we do have some private companies that have raised capital recently, one public company as well, and I suspect others are evaluating that, given those opportunities are open. So it's a double-edged sword. It's great for our portfolio companies, more equity. We refinanced cash for a life science company. So it's important that they have some ability to raise equity, particularly when things are good. It does make originating new loans, I would say, modestly more challenging.

Your next question is coming from William Koch.

This is Bill Koch calling. I'm a shareholder. I'm not a financial person. In fact, I'm a criminal defense lawyer. All the financial numbers are, I think, great with this company. The only reason why I'm a shareholder, though, is because SWK owns Enteris, and I owned Unigene stock 20, 25 years ago. I'd like – so it's almost like I'd like to have a lot of questions, and I couldn't really – I mean, I know what they are, but I couldn't really formulate them given that I just found out last night that this conference call is going to be this morning. But going back to stuff that Unigene did, some of the situations they were in, like with Pfizer and how they competed with Emisphere through the years, all the deals, the big deals they had that Unigene had and then Enteris had with sort of potentially never worked out, but potential blockbuster drugs. So I'm not sure if I could – should just start asking questions or if I could send you an email.

Yes. Let me – let me maybe kind of frame it this way, and maybe it makes sense for us to get on a call too, because I can walk you through kind of what's happened, SWK's involvement, and a lot of specifics around Unigene in the transition. So we purchased Enteris, it's been over 4 years ago, might have been 5 years ago. And at the time, the thesis really was, hey, this is a cool technology. They're helping peptide and certain small molecules go from IV to oral. There were some interesting things in the pipeline. And yes, we saw the Emisphere transaction and sort of their involvement with GLP-1s, and we thought, wow, this is pretty cool. Fast forward, I would say the execution wasn't great, and we certainly hold responsibility for that. I would say the window was kind of missed. So they're still talking to folks about additional licenses. And we've come close a couple of times, but the window was sort of missed. There was probably a 4- or 5-year window when there were some opportunities to get some things done. And again, execution wasn't great. So when the Board put me in as CEO, we looked at that business and said, 'Hey, can we really add value doing what we're doing now?' And if you look at our financials, it was a cash-burning situation. So we were sending money from our finance business to Enteris, which none of us wanted to do. And we made the decision to really downsize that business. So we reduced the headcount. There's a new CEO there named Paul Shields, and we really refocused that around kind of classic CDMO operations. So their focus right now on some unique dosing types and helping companies evaluate those dosing types in Phase 1 and Phase 2. So we still have Peptelligence. There are still some efforts to do some licenses there. As mentioned, we're talking to people, and we've come close a couple of times, but unfortunately, I think the window for monetizing that IP is probably not all the way closed, but it's not where it was 5 years ago.

Okay. I mean, Emisphere only had an oral delivery technology, and I believe Unigene's technology was demonstrated to be superior in delivering the API into the bloodstream in those calcitonin studies years ago. Emisphere was acquired by Novo for over $1 billion, which is why I thought SWK might invest in Enteris to secure significant deals. However, it seems that won't be happening.

I would say we haven't given up. There's still some efforts there. But look, you're exactly saying our thesis. That is exactly what we thought. We purchased it for, I think, $19 million. We got some of the Cara license. So your thesis is exactly what we thought. And at the time, I think we thought there was some work in the pipeline on GLP-1, and I don't want to get too in the weeds here, but we saw all those same things about this could be a huge upside scenario. So again, I don't think it was a crazy idea. It didn't work out like we would have hoped. But yes, I think your points are well taken. And just I guess the last comment I would say is, if you look at any of these dosing companies' technologies, most of the large pharma biotechs, they have some of those internal capabilities. And you're right, like the Peptelligence technology is, from what we've seen from data from talking to partners, it's the best out there in terms of getting certain APIs where they need to go. However, is it a differentiating enough factor to get someone to pay a royalty? That's always a challenge. So if you can get 10% of the API where it needs to go versus 5%, that's awesome. That's great. Is it valuable enough for someone to pay a royalty or do they say, 'You know what, 5%, we can maybe up the milligram and still get the coverage we need?' So that's what you're always wrestling with there.

Okay. All right. I appreciate it.

Absolutely, yes. And feel free to call, I'm happy to chat on that, and we'd love to hear your views on sort of what happened there.

There are no further questions in the queue.

Well, thanks for the questions, Mark and Bill, and thanks for joining the call. I'm around today. The team is around today and tomorrow if you'd like to reach out and hope everyone has a good day. Bye-bye.

Thank you, everyone. This concludes today's event. You may disconnect at this time, and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.