Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Vale’s First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. This conference is being recorded, and the replay will be available on our website vale.com. The presentation is available for download in English and Portuguese from our website. To listen to the call in Portuguese, please press the globe icon on the lower right side of your Zoom screen and then choose to enter the Portuguese room. Then select mute original audio, so that you won’t hear the English version in the background. We would like to inform that all participants are currently in a listen-only mode for the presentations. Further instructions will be provided before we begin the question-and-answer section of our call. We would like to advise that forward-looking statements may be provided in this presentation, including Vale’s expectations about future events or results, encompassing those matters listed in the respective presentation. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. To obtain information on factors that may lead to results different from those forecast by Vale, please consult the reports Vale files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Brazilian Comissão de Valores Mobiliários, and in particular the factors discussed under forward-looking statements and risks factors in Vale’s annual report on Form 20-F. With us today are Mr. Eduardo De Salles Bartolomeo, CEO; Mr. Gustavo Pimenta, Executive Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations; Mr. Marcello Spinelli, Executive Vice President, Iron Ore Solutions; Mr. Carlos Medeiros, Executive Vice President of Operations; and Mr. Mark Cutifani, Chairman of Vale Base Metals. Now, I will turn the conference over to Mr. Eduardo Bartolomeo. Sir, you may now begin.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. I’m very excited that we got off to a good start in 2024. Starting with our safety journey, technological enhancements, and innovation towards safety improvements are showing encouraging results with a 77% reduction in accidents in some critical activities. On dam safety, the Peneirinha dam located in the Vargem Grande Complex was removed from the emergency level by the National Mining Agency and is now certified as safe and stable. On our second level, the stabilization of our iron ore operations is taking Vale to an even higher level of performance. Iron ore production had the highest output for our first quarter since 2019 and sales were up 15% year-over-year. On our third level, one of Vale’s major competitive advantages is our potential to grow a high-quality portfolio with low capital intensity. Our three key projects will add 50 million tons capacity by 2026. Vargem Grande, Capanema, and S11D plus 20. The first project to come online will be Vargem Grande, which is almost 90% completed and on track to start up in the fourth quarter of 2024. In our path to transform the Energy Transition Metal business, copper production grew 22% in the first quarter. Nickel production decreased by 4% year-on-year in line with the plan, mainly reflecting maintenance overhaul at the Onça Puma furnace. Outside Brazil, we saw stronger performance in the Canadian and Indonesian operations. On the Energy Transition Metals partnership, last week the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States granted the final regulatory approval and we expect to close the transaction in the upcoming weeks. In our pursuit towards ESG leadership in mining, we reached a remarkable target: 100% renewable energy consumption in Brazil two years ahead of schedule. Reaching the target means that Vale has zeroed its indirect CO2 emissions in Brazil, which corresponds to Scope 2 emissions. To support our decarbonization pathway, Vale has announced an agreement to acquire the remaining 45% stake in Aliança Energia, which is a first step towards creating an asset-light energy platform. Lastly, our discipline in capital allocation remains untouched. We are walking the talk and returning value to shareholders. In March, we paid $2.3 billion in dividends while completing 17% of the fourth buyback program launched since 2020. Now, let’s go over more details of our quarter performance. We’re gradually becoming a safer company. Technology and innovation have been key pillars to our quest to deliver a sustainable safety performance. We want to turn Vale into a safety benchmark starting with zeroing our N2 injuries those that usually precede life-changing or fatal events by the end of 2025. We are on the right track to fulfill this commitment. Our safety transformation program targets the critical activities with the highest N2 records, later developing preventive controls, some of them technology-based like collision alerts and driver drowsiness detection. As a result, we had a 77% reduction in any two events since 2019. Another key element of our safety strategy is our dam safety management. Since 2020, we increased safety conditions up to adequate levels for 16 dams. All our structures are continuously checked by our 24/7 geotechnical monitoring centers. In a conservative approach, we removed 100% of the people from risk areas and backup dams were constructed to reduce potential consequences in those areas. At the same time, Vale continues to progress on the dam de-characterization program with 43% of the structures eliminated to date. We are already seeing a safer Vale built with operational discipline and a strong management model. We delivered a robust operating performance on iron ore in Q1. Production was the highest for our first quarter since 2019 underpinned by increased asset and process reliability, especially at S11D. Our operational plan for the quarter was successful in dealing with a higher average rainfall. We delivered a 6% increase in total production and 15% higher sales year-on-year. Moreover, we continue to debottleneck our operations. At S11D, increased geological knowledge enables more accurate mining plans while the truckless system combined with a mobile mining fleet provides further operating flexibility. Our long-term ability to deal with jaspilite relies on the installation of the new crushers, as you know. But these surgical measures have allowed us to operate S11D with more efficiency with the highest production for our first quarter since 2020. The solid production performance in Q1 gives us further confidence that we will deliver our guidance as planned. We are committed to accelerating solutions to support the steel industry’s decarbonization. Our briquette plant is ramping up in our Tubarao complex aiming to deliver around 1.5 million tons of briquettes in 2024. We continue to progress on agreements for the construction of mega hubs. We are also studying the feasibility of developing green industrial hubs in Spain together with Hydnum Steel. Finally, we are very proud to be selected under the Inflation Reduction Act funding to enter negotiations to develop a briquette plant in the U.S. The selection by the U.S. Government Department of Energy represents a critical path for the validation of our proprietary technology and its potential to deliver a transformative solution to decarbonize the steel sector. Iron ore briquettes will contribute to achieving Vale’s commitment to reduce 15% of its Scope 3 net emissions by 2035. In the Energy Transition Metals business, we delivered remarkable output in copper, an outstanding 22% increase quarter-on-quarter driven by the successful ramp-up of Salobo 3 and a stronger performance at Salobo 1 and 2 plants. On nickel, we are on track to deliver the production guidance for 2024. As part of the asset review initiatives, Sudbury mines had improved performance and the Clarabelle mill throughput was up 7% year-on-year. The improved mine performance resulted in reduced consumption of third-party feed and lower costs. We are confident that we are taking the right steps to transform the Energy Transition Metals business. On ESG, we continue to march towards becoming a more transparent and open company. We just released our 2023 integrated report where we announced that we reached the target of 100% renewable energy consumption in Brazil, two years ahead of schedule. Reaching the target means that Vale has zero Scope 2 emissions in Brazil. To support our decarbonization pathway, Vale signed an agreement to acquire the remaining 45% stake in Aliança Energia. This is an important step towards creating an asset-light energy platform. Upon the transaction conclusion, Vale will search for potential partners to better advance in our commitments to decarbonize our operations using renewable sources at competitive costs. Our big focus on becoming an ESG leader in mining is bearing fruit. Our improvement in carbon emissions and safe practices led to recognition by Sustainalytics for instance with an important upgrade in our ESG risk rating in April. With that said, now I pass the floor to Gustavo for our financial results, and I’ll get back to you in the Q&A. Thank you.

Thanks Eduardo, and good morning, everyone. Let me start with our EBITDA performance in the quarter. As you can see, we delivered a pro forma EBITDA of $3.5 billion in Q1. Before going to the main drivers, I would like to first explain a couple of reporting changes we implemented this quarter with the reorganization of our assets between Iron Ore Solutions and Energy Transition Metals, some items previously classified as others will now be allocated to their respective business segments. This change includes items such as SG&A and energy generation assets, and we will allow for more precise evaluation of each business segment’s performance. In addition, for better alignment with market peers, we are now including the proportional EBITDA of our associates and joint ventures into our EBITDA. We note that before 2024, our EBITDA included the dividends coming from those entities, which were naturally more volatile during the year. Now, returning to the main drivers behind our EBITDA performance in the quarter. We are pleased to see a continued strong operational performance across the board, which helped us offset a large portion of the impact from provisional prices given the decrease in the iron ore benchmark prices during the quarter. On volumes, iron ore sales increased almost 15% or 8.2 million tons year-on-year driven by better operational performance in all of our systems, highlighting S11D which achieved the highest output for our first quarter since 2020. Sales were also quite strong in Q1 this year, reflecting the initiatives undertaken in 2023 to improve operational performance and flexibility of our Ponta da Madeira port. Corporate sales were another highlight in the quarter, increasing by 22% or 14,000 tons year-on-year driven by the ramp-up of Salobo 3 and better operational performance in the Salobo 1 and 2 operations. On costs and expenses, I would like to highlight the ongoing effort that our teams have been making internally to improve productivity and efficiency. Excluding the external effects of higher freight costs in the iron ore business and the one-off effects in base metals like the Onça Puma furnace rebuild, our costs and expenses were roughly flat year-on-year. Again, this is being accomplished through a series of initiatives across the business and we are quite excited about the cost-efficient opportunities we still see ahead of us. Now, moving on to price realization, iron ore fines realized price was $100.7 per ton in Q1, 7% lower year-on-year and 15% lower quarter-on-quarter. Pricing mechanisms had a negative impact of $10 per ton on our realized price in the quarter, largely explained by the negative effect of provisional prices. At the end of Q1, 24% of our iron ore fines sales were booked at $102 per ton on average which compares to an average price of $124 per ton in the quarter. Also, about 30 million tons of sales from Q4 ‘23 were booked at an average price of $139 per ton and were later realized at lower prices in Q1. Our average iron ore fines premium came in negative at $1.6 per ton as we increase the share of high silica products in our sales mix given the lower discounts observed for these products during the quarter. This has allowed us to maintain an adequate balance of high-quality products through our supply chain for later value maximization. For Q2, we continue to see similar market conditions and therefore expected to maintain a slightly higher share of high silica products in our mix compared to historical levels. Now, let me turn to our cost performance. In iron ore, our C1 cash cost ex-third-party purchases was $23.5 per ton, slightly lower versus last year despite the negative impact of the BRL appreciation. Excluding this effect, C1 would have been $22.8 per ton, almost $1 per ton lower year-on-year. This was driven by lower demurrage costs due to improved shipping and port loading during the rainy season, higher fixed cost dilution as a result of higher production volumes and gains from our cost efficiency programs. Additionally, I would like to take a moment to comment on our strategy behind third-party purchases. We acquire iron ore from smaller producers that operate near our operations. This product is sold directly to our customers or blended within our own production, generating a positive contribution margin. This helps dilute fixed costs, particularly as we have excess logistic capacity while capital intensity is very low, which implies a very healthy return on invested capital. In 2023 our third-party volume was 24 million tons and it is expected to increase slightly in 2024. We are also evaluating accelerating the development of some of our smaller deposits through leasing agreements with regional partners, transactions that can offer attractive returns for both sides. Moving on to our Energy Transition Metals business, we were pleased to deliver significant year-on-year reductions in all-in costs in both copper and nickel. Our copper all-in costs decreased by 26% year-on-year driven by continued successful ramp-up of Salobo 3 and improved operational performance at Salobo 1 and 2. The higher proportion of Salobo 3 volumes in the product mix has also contributed to an increase in unit by-product revenues with higher gold sales. Nickel all-in costs were down 14% year-on-year supported by higher unit by-product revenues. The unit COGS increase was expected and largely related to the furnace rebuild at Onça Puma. I would like to also mention that Mark Cutifani and the VBM team continue to make significant progress on the asset review. The Vale unlock opportunities are being assessed and designed for implementation over the next two to three years with some benefits already being captured in the shorter term. As we pointed out last quarter, we’ll present the key findings and action plan of the asset review in our webinar to be scheduled for June this year. Now moving on to cash generation, our EBITDA to cash conversion was 57% in Q1 with free cash flow reaching $2 billion roughly $0.5 billion lower than Q4 2023 despite the $3.4 billion sequential drop in EBITDA driven mostly by seasonally lower shipments quarter-on-quarter and lower iron ore prices. This was achieved primarily due to the positive impact of a strong cash collection from Q4 sales as we had anticipated last quarter and seasonally lower CapEx disbursements. Most of the free cash flow generation was used to pay dividends and execute our buyback program for total shareholder remuneration of $2.6 billion in Q1. So, before we move on to the Q&A session, I would like to reinforce the key messages from today’s call. Safety continues to be our key priority, and we remain highly focused on creating the conditions for an accident-free workplace environment. Our continued strong operational performance across all commodities only reinforces we are in the right direction to consistently deliver on our short-term and long-term commitments. On ESG, we are making significant progress on several fronts as demonstrated by our recent achievement of 100% renewable sourcing in Brazil for Scope 2 and the continued investments to deliver a sustainable future for our businesses. On the medium-term strategic objectives we laid out at Vale Day, we are quite pleased to see the development of our key projects such as Vargem Grande, which we expected to reach startup later this year. These investments will position Vale as the leader in high-quality offerings which are critical for steelmaking decarbonization. Last, we remain highly committed to a disciplined capital allocation process as evidenced by our $2.6 billion cash return to shareholders year-to-date through dividends and share buybacks. Now, I would like to open the call for questions. Thank you.

We are going to start the question-and-answer section of the call. Our first question comes from Rafael Barcellos with Bradesco BBI.

Hello. Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. So firstly, I would say that the main news in the sector was the potential merger between BHP and Anglo American. So, maybe if you could discuss a bit on how this movement could change Vale’s strategy going forward, it could be interesting for us, or even how could it change your recently announced partnership at Anglo’s Minas-Rio assets? And, my second question here is maybe to just understand there your views on iron ore markets and price premiums in the coming quarters. And, of course, how do you see the possibility of further extraordinary dividends, now with prices back to the $120 per ton level? And, thanks.

Thanks, Rafael. It’s Eduardo here. Okay? As you’ve noticed, it’s truly unfolding, so we are still digesting what is going on. Specifically answering your question, we don’t see any impacts on the Minas-Rio deal. It’s being undertaken with Anglo is going to be respected by whoever comes later if it comes later. So, that’s the first reaction. Second is, we’ve been speaking with you since we decided to do the carve-out, right? We believe that Vale has a unique position in the industry. We do have a growth platform in iron ore, as Gustavo mentioned during his presentation. We are going to add 50 million tons of high-quality with low cost. So, there’s no other asset in the world that could be attractive to us on that sense. When you look at base metals, we still have, as well, the best endowment in Canada, Brazil, Carajás province, and Indonesia. Obviously, we’re always looking at opportunities eventually, but it doesn’t change our strategic focus on executing the asset review, the transformation in base metals. There’s a tremendous amount of value to be extracted there. And iron ore, we are the only iron ore growth with quality in the sector. So, we will follow up closely the development of this deal, but it doesn’t impact our strategy or change anything in our mindset. And I’ll pass the second question to Spinelli.

Thank you, Rafael. Regarding the market, so we see China, as you mentioned, we remain with the same view about China. That’s the main market. We’re calling this moment the China resiliency. Despite the problems and the proper markets that all of us track, we’ve seen since ‘21 a very strong market in manufacturing growing really constantly, with the energy transition industry or shipbuilding, so we have an offset for that. We’ll be considering the exports as something that is sometimes bothering the markets, but, by the end of the day, it’s a trade-off between protection in the market and inflation. All the micron conditions in China are going well. Still, inventory now is lower than last year, and the margins are getting better. As a whole, we see the market really similar compared to last year. You asked us about the premiums. Premiums by product, we see a stable moment. We’ve been stable for some months, some quarters actually. So, we see Carajás and also the BRBF in a stable gap. We can have a small upside risk if we have some spike in the coke and coal market that can increase the necessity for efficiency.

Next question from Caio Ribeiro with Bank of America.

Yes, thank you very much. Good morning. Thanks for the opportunity. So first of all, I just wanted to see if you could share some updates with us on the latest involving the Onça Puma and Sossego operations. Any color that you can share on expected operational financial impacts there would be helpful? And then my second question is related to the renegotiation of the railroad concessions rate. Can you give us some color there as well on your latest expectations around those negotiations and on timing as well to conclude them? Thank you.

I think Mark is on the call, right? Mark, could you answer the first one?

Yes. Thanks, Eduardo. Can you hear me okay?

Yes.

Okay. Good. Well, thanks for the question. On both operations, we’re working through with the authorities as we speak. In the case of Sossego, what has been outlined to us is that there were some complaints on noise and dust and complaints around reduced social programs through COVID. We have already submitted our reports for those issues, which were subject to the first complaint. Now that it’s clear that we’ve input the reports, we’re now working through detail that’s contained in those reports both with the authorities and local political leaderships as well. We’ve got about three to four weeks' ore on the ground to process. So, we’re in good shape in terms of our ore supply because it’s the mines that are actually impacted. So, processes are still going forward. On Onça Puma, it’s a fairly similar story in terms of complaints, a little bit different in terms of some of the mining work more environmental-related, but also connected to social programs and a similar story. We’re working through with the authorities. We are also talking to other leaders in the community, very sensitive to making sure that people aren’t impacted. Everybody’s keen to make sure we get things up and running very quickly. In Onça Puma, we’ve got about four months of work because we’ve now finished the furnace rebuild and we’re on heat-up at the moment, still going through those processes. But again, at this stage, we’re not anticipating problems over the course of the year. We should be able to make up the production through the course of the year. May might be impacted on the furnace issue, but that’s more an operating ramp-up to full capacity issue than anything connected to the current mining shutdown because we’ve got lots of ores. So, that’s where we are. I would expect during the course of next week, we’ll have both issues pretty well in view, and we’ll let everybody know where we’re up to.

Caio, thank you for your question. So first of all, we have a very solid contract. We’ve spent over four years to reach a deal for the renewal, with all the approvals at all levels, federal levels, and it’s important to say we are complying with our obligations. Nevertheless, we’ve been talking to the transportation ministry. We see room to optimize some specific parts of the contract and adjust some obligations that can bring value for the company, and we see that we can balance this value with new obligations to pay. So, you may expect a balanced negotiation. We are finalizing the discussion and we expect the final terms soon.

Next question from Carlos De Alba with Morgan Stanley.

Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. So, my question may be similar to the last one, but focusing a little bit on Mariana. You clearly took a provision in the fourth quarter, and now you provided us with an updated disbursement path. And there were news overnight about the potential restart or reportedly restart of the negotiations this week. So, I don’t know if you can provide an update there. Clearly, a key concern by the market, something that everyone would like to get resolved. I think the companies, the authorities, and certainly the people that were impacted. So an update on that would be great. And my second question is, in light of the increasing CapEx at Serra Sul 120 as well as the invoices value expansion and the revision on CapEx of the Briquette projects. How can we think about, how should we think about the 2025, maybe 2026 CapEx for the company? Thank you.

Hey, Carlos. This is Gustavo. So, Mariana, yes, your question is spot on. We are highly engaged with the counterparties. The mediation process, as you probably know, has been ongoing and we engaged more actively, recently in order to find a resolution that works for everybody. We continue to be hopeful that by mid-year, we can reach a negotiated outcome, which we all think is the ideal path in this case. So, stay tuned. We’ll keep you updated, but we are certainly engaged looking for ways to find an agreeable solution here for all parties. On the CapEx, we’ve updated. The main one is S11D. It’s over a period of years as we get to commissioning 2026. So, no impact on our guidance and our expectations as we have before for the final years. This year, we are still within the $6.5 billion no impact, and we should be able to accommodate those increases in the following years as well.

Next question from Jon Brandt with HSBC.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I just wanted to clarify on an earlier answer, Eduardo. Just given the Anglo BHP news today, are you sort of unequivocally saying that Vale has no interest in the Anglo assets and that you’re more watching to see what the impact is from a potential deal but Vale has no interest in those assets? Is that correct? And then I guess my question is really around we sort of discussed some of the rail concessions, some of the permits, the some sort of liabilities, etcetera. I’m just wondering, I think that’s sort of a big part of the reason for Vale’s underperformance relative to peers. I’m just wondering what you can do or what Vale can do to sort of improve the relationship that you have with the government, right? I mean, you’ve talked a lot about stability, and wanting sort of a stable environment. This seems to be anything but so I’m just wondering what you can do or what Vale can do to sort of improve the relationship that you have with the government so that the market doesn’t have to deal with these sorts of issues? And then my second question just really quickly is, it looks like on the breakeven costs for copper, they came in well below guidance for 2024. I’m just wondering how much upside risk there is to that guidance number. Is this a seasonal issue? Or has some of the things, Mark, that you’ve put into place really starting to bear fruit? Thank you.

Thanks, Jon. It's clear that we are interested in Anglo assets. As I mentioned earlier, we have better and more affordable options available internally. Going to a bid wouldn't make sense for us. That's why we're carefully monitoring assets that could affect our strategies, like Minas-Rio, which we've recently closed with Anglo and is now secured. For the other assets, we're taking a wait-and-see approach to understand future developments. In the meantime, we're focused on accelerating and executing our own initiatives. Regarding the railway concessions, that's an important question since it isn't solely a Vale issue. It's been managed through Humu and MRIS, among other concessions, and is not specific to us. We believe we have a robust contract, and we are looking to refine some details to create a win-win situation with the government, which we believe will foster a better and more stable relationship. We have historically maintained good relationships. Now, the second question is directed to you, so I'll pass on a couple of questions to Mark.

I can, we probably lost Mark. I can take it, Jon? Yes, it was a good first quarter, especially given the strong ramp-up of Salobo, right? Salobo 3, plus also a strong operational performance in Salobo 1 and 2. We are not resetting expectations, but what I can say is looking pretty good within the guidance that we had laid out. Hopefully, through year-end, or the remaining part of the year, we can provide more details around it.

Next question from Leonardo Correa with BTG Pactual.

Good morning, everyone. I have a couple of questions on my side. Yes. So, the first one, I’m not sure if Mark is back, so feel free.

Yes.

You are, okay. Perfect. Welcome back, Mark. On the base metal story still, right? I mean, they’re very mixed results, very pressured by in fairness by pressured nickel prices, but you’re having a dual-speed situation, where basically copper is performing very well, perhaps above expectations, and nickel is performing well below expectations. The overall results have been pressured if you take a year of expectations for EBITDA and base metals were way above what you guys are currently delivering. And I get the point that there’s a lot under review, so I don’t want to be unfair. But, and I know that Gustavo, and I think in the opening remarks, he said that by June we’re going to have more details. But, I mean, just thinking of you, do you see an opportunity to adjust capacities into perhaps put some of Vale’s nickel assets under care and maintenance at this point just given market conditions are unfavorable and the assets are not generating any EBITDA? So, my first question is specifically to nickel, how you see the evolution and how viable certain assets of Vale are in this scenario? The second question, I think there was a question on this, Gustavo, but I think it wasn’t addressed yet. But, if I may, just moving back to the dividend situation and the extraordinary dividend potential for the latter part of this year. With all these questions on additional provisions and outflows, how are you viewing this? I mean, we’re getting some help from minor prices lately, so we’re back to $120. How are you viewing this extraordinary dividend story with your leverage, which is now at the upper side of your tolerance, let’s say? Those are the two questions. Thank you very much.

Okay. Go ahead, Mark. Mark, you’re on mute.

How’s that?

Okay. I copy you.

Okay. Gustavo made the observation on copper, around Salobo’s improvement, and that was very encouraging flowing into the first quarter coming off a strong last quarter as well. That pointed to a few changes that were made over the last six or nine months. We’ve had similar, albeit lagging performance at Sudbury because we did the asset review in Sudbury about three months after Salobo. Eduardo pointed to the 7% improvement at Clarabelle. On a run rate basis, it’s closer to 15%, and that reflects both copper and nickel. We think we’ve got good trends at two of the most important operations. Indonesia remains fairly solid. Onça Puma is coming through the furnace rebuild and is heating up. What we are flagging is a likely intention to push some of that feed north to try and improve the premiums on products we receive. It’s not simply about operations; it’s also about price realizations. With the price volatility, and what we think will be a premium related to the products that we produce from Canada, we think there’s still a lot of potential on both the cost side and the pricing side that we’re looking at. With the volatility we’re seeing in the nickel market, what we don’t want to do is start cutting production where we’re already seeing material reductions in operating costs, and we think there’s a real premium. We want to give it another two or three months, and that’s what we want to reflect and show you in June. We still think there are two stories playing out, the operating improvement plus premiums that we can get by using our flow sheets better filling Matsusaka, doing more work at clinic, and making sure we’ve got all the molecules heading in the right direction. It’ll be a story in two parts, and I think we’ll be able to show that in June that we’re looking at both operating cost and margin improvements as well on the pricing side.

Thanks, Mark. And I will take the second one. Apologies also to Rafael that we haven’t responded to the first question on the extraordinary dividend potential. Look, as you know, it depends on several elements. Certainly, market conditions have improved lately, which give us some good expectations of potential cash generation through year-end. But we also compare those vis-a-vis where we are on the leverage ratio, minimum cash, provisions, and outflows. So, I think it’s early, and we think it’s early to point out to potential incremental dividends, but we’ll certainly assess that through the year-end. If there’s any opportunity we will certainly consider with our Board as we always do.

Next question from Myles Allsop with UBS.

Hi, there. Yes, a couple of questions. First of all, on iron ore. Obviously, a very strong first quarter. The guidance for 2024 either looks conservative or you have some concerns about potential operating challenges later this year. I mean, should we look at the guidance as conservative or other things we should bear in mind for later in the year? And then maybe secondly, on the nickel side, a question for Mark. I mean, the challenges in the nickel market are driven by Indonesia, and obviously, Vale’s contributing to those incremental tons. What’s the latest with the Indonesian projects? And is there any desire to slow those back to try and rebalance the market? Thank you.

Hi, Myles. This is Carlos Medeiros. It’s too early days to review our 2024 guidance. We had quite a good Q1, but still, there are challenges as we see ahead. We also had a very strong second half of the year last year. So, this is why we prefer to maintain our guidance. If we decide to revisit it, it will be done later in the year. Meanwhile, we’re still working on the usual levels to increase production, initiatives such as our seasonality plan that has proved to be robust, the reliability initiatives to continue to improve overall equipment availability, our mining plans to review the mine’s geometries, whatever necessary to free up more ore. Also in the hydrogeology initiatives to make sure that our water balance in our mines offers additional opportunities to access the bottom of the pit earlier during the year. So all-in-all, we’ll keep it for now, and we might get back to you later. Thank you.

Yes, Myles, on the nickel side. On the question on Indonesia, I think the first thing to recognize is the divestment announcements and milestones that were achieved were very positive. Certainly, we moved through that fairly quickly with the Indonesian government, so credit to everybody involved. Second point, funds on Palma have been committed, as per the requirements, and we’re still working through the early phases of that. In terms of the commitment on new projects, again, we’re very mindful of our obligations with our partners. But at the same time, we’re also making the point that we need to be prudent and consider each individual investment proposition very carefully. There is a little bit of uncertainty in the marketplace regarding how different products will be priced in the market. Great news for us in Canada is that it’s likely we will do better than most, because of the nature of the material and the low carbon footprint. Indonesia will probably be in a very different conversation, and we’re working with our partners just to make sure we understand that and what that means for each of the investments. We’re also mindful of the fact that we need to pace those additions with the market as well. But again, it’s an open conversation with our partners. It’s still early in that process, I have to say. So, we’ve got a bit more work to do.

Vale team, ready for your next question? Next question from Timna Tanners with Wolfe Research.

Hey. Good morning. I want to dive down a little more into cost if you could please, whatever the recent voluntary and kind of what prices would be great to hear that can do to manage the cost side this quarter can you give us an update, what your thoughts despite the progress on the purchase side? That’s my first question. The second is just an outlook on the premium.

Timna, sorry. It’s getting crunched. Could you speak it again?

Sure. Is that any better?

Yes, a little bit.

I’m sorry. Just asking for any outlook on cost given the loss of price volatility and any guidance for third-party purchase cost. Anything you can do to obtain cost overall on the higher cost side.

Okay. We got it. We got this one.

Hey, Timna. Gustavo here. On the cost outlook, we came in at a C1 at $23.5. It’s slightly lower than last year. You have to be mindful that Q1 is usually our toughest quarter given the lower volumes that are produced. So, the effect of dilution is limited, as we saw last year. When we look at the forecast for the year, we feel super confident with the numbers that we laid out the $21.5 to $23. A lot of the cost efficiency initiatives that we’ve started 18 months ago are bearing fruit, and sales are coming in strong. Production is coming in strong. We are feeling good about it. The challenges which have been managed, on all in, I think Leonardo made that reference in terms of the breakeven cost, has been mostly associated with the freight rates, which Vale is mostly hedged, which is one of our competitive advantages. Not 100% hedged, so you saw an uptick this quarter. This is one of the headwinds that we’ve been able to manage. We are now probably 90% hedged in terms of our demands for the year, also hedged on the Brent costs. The other element here are the premiums, which came a little tighter given market conditions. But all-in-all, we feel very good with the numbers we have laid out in terms of course and the forecast for the year for both C1 and all-in costs across all businesses by the way.

Next question from Ricardo Monegaglia with Safra.

Hello. Good morning, everyone. I have a couple of questions, actually, follow-ups from previous questions. First, on the base metals business, are there any changes to commodity price hedge policies given the recent rally in metals prices? And the second question still on base metals is, are there any updates that you could share with us regarding the conclusion of the Vale base metals transaction? It continues to be expected to occur in the second quarter. What are the final steps to conclude this acquisition that would be interesting to understand? And my second question is on iron ore quality. Based on the target for the year and 1Q ’24 levels, it implies that quality will come above the level of 62.5% in the coming quarters. Should we expect this trend already in the second quarter or could high silica sales continue high or at the same levels as in the first quarter? Those are my questions. Thank you, guys.

Gustavo.

Sure. Thanks, Ricardo. So I’ll do the first ones, and then Spinelli will cover the premiums. On the hedging, we usually don’t do it. That’s the nature of the business. We like to run the exposure unless there are some very unique conditions where we may want to consider. That’s part of the nature of our business, and we like to run with exposure in those commodities. On the VBM, we’ve got I think Eduardo mentioned in his prep remarks, we’ve got all the regulatory approvals and we are now working with partners to move to closing, which we expected to happen in the next couple of weeks. So, keep the market updated about it. So, I’ll turn back to Spinelli.

Okay. Thank you, Ricardo. So, regarding the quality of average, it depends on the first, in the production mix and you saw that we had a good performance in the north system. As we have a pattern of higher production in the second half, that will naturally increase the average grade. Regarding sales, you’re right. We had an advantage to sell directly the high silica in the first part of the year, actually at the end of last year. So, we can take this choice every actually, every day we assess this. So, as we move forward during the year, we have the possibility to blend this product or to concentrate this product or sell them directly. In the second half, we don’t have a lot of high silica as we increase the production in the north system and we prioritize the blend. After that, we can choose the remaining high silica if we want to sell directly or not. It’s difficult to precise in advance; it depends on the market conditions.

Next question from Gabriel Simoes with Goldman Sachs.

Hi. Can you hear me?

Yes.

Okay. Thanks for taking my questions. I actually have one quick follow-up on one of the questions that were asked before. Actually, I just wanted to understand on the development of your iron ore projects. So, if you could comment a bit, on how the development is going with the capacity increases in projects. So, Vargem Grande and Capanema and Plus 20, that’d be great, because we just wanted to understand how the projects are doing so far and how confident you are with the timeline you provided earlier. I know you mentioned that Sossego should remain on the same timeline. Just wanted to have a better sense of the other ones. Thank you.

So, Gabriel, Gustavo here. Yes, we’re feeling pretty good about it. We gave you some stats during Eduardo’s presentation of where each one of those projects are. We have a series of projects, but the three main ones we’ve been pointing out are Vargem Grande, Capanema, and Plus 20. They are moving along the timeline we had established. So, we’re feeling pretty good about it. Vargem Grande, for example, the expectation is that to start, have it start up by the end of the year. That’s one of the key projects that we’ve promised to deliver through 2026 to have that increase and take value to a potential range of 340 to 360. So, I’m moving along the plan, and we feel pretty good about those deliverables.

This concludes today’s question-and-answer session. We would like to hand the floor back to Mr. Eduardo Bartolomeo for the company’s final remarks.

Okay. Thank you. Well, just to conclude, I think, as we say here in Brazil, we start with the right foot. We start the year in a very good shape. We always like to say that we win the game in the first quarter. We’re not that arrogant, so we know we still have nine months to go. The rainy season isn’t over yet in the North, but the thesis of safety versus production is being proved that we can be safer and reliable, and that’s I think is a very important message. We are seeing a positive market in iron ore and in copper as well. Nickel has its challenges. Lastly answered by Gustavo, our projects are on time, on budget. So, we will deliver on it. In June, we’re going to have more color on the asset review. In the end, every about the noises that are around us, we see some overhangs starting to get off of the radar as Mariana is expected to be over by there; we’ll try our best to do it by the first half. The renewal is going to be over, it’s not going to be material. With that said, if we see through the noise, we remain extremely disciplined, extremely focused on what we have to do, and we still see extremely huge opportunities to invest in Vale. So, again, thanks a lot for your attention, and hope to see you in the next call. Okay? Thank you, and have a safe day.

Vale’s conference is now concluded. We thank you for your participation.