Greetings, and welcome to Vitesse Energy's call to discuss the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Earnings. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to the Director of Investor Relations and Business Development at Vitesse, Ben Messier. Thank you. You may begin.

Good morning, and thank you for joining. Today, we will be discussing our 2024 results and the expectations for 2025, including the impact of the acquisition of Lucero Energy Corp which closed last Friday. Our 10-K and earnings were released yesterday after market close and an updated investor presentation can be found on the Vitesse website. I'm joined here this morning by Bob Gerrity, Vitesse's Chairman and CEO; our President, Brian Cree; and our CFO, Jimmy Henderson. Before we begin, please be reminded that this call may contain estimates, projections, and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. Please review our earnings release and risk factors discussed in our filings with the SEC for additional information. In addition, today's discussion may reference non-GAAP financial measures. For reconciliation of historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, please reference our 10-K and earnings release. Now I'll turn the call over to Vitesse's Chairman and CEO, Bob Gerrity.

Thanks, Ben. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in today's earnings call. In 2024, we continued to deliver on our mandate to return capital to shareholders. It was a good year. We increased our dividend in June and have now paid $4.07 in dividends per share since our spinoff in January 2023, while converting our undeveloped asset base to producing wells and sourcing highly economic deals, at the same time maintaining a conservative balance sheet. Last week we closed the acquisition of Lucero Energy Corp in a stock-for-stock transaction. We expect this transaction to be immediately accretive to key financial metrics, bolstering the dividend and further strengthening our balance sheet. With Lucero now closed, our Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.5625 per common share to be paid on March 31st. That's $2.25 per share on an annualized basis. This represents a 7% increase to the dividend sequentially. Our Board of Directors has increased to nine members, with Gary Reaves and Bruce Chernoff joining the Vitesse board from Lucero. Their deep knowledge and experience will complement our Board nicely. I want to thank all the team members who have worked so diligently on this transaction, both from Lucero and Vitesse. The hard work on both sides was key to its success. For 2025, our strategy is consistent. We will continue to return capital to shareholders via the fixed dividend and allocate capital based on our returns-based hierarchy. We are well-positioned to pursue additional acquisitions. I will now hand the call over to our President, Brian Cree, to discuss our operations.

Good morning, everyone, and thanks Bob. Production for the year was just over 13,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. We expect production for the first quarter to be between 14,000 and 15,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day with a significant increase in the second quarter as Lucero was closed in March. As of December 31st, 2024, we had 17.7 net wells in our development pipeline, including 9.7 net wells that were either drilling or completing, and another eight net locations that had been permitted for development. The Lucero assets include 1.9 net wells that are waiting on completion and another 5.3 net locations that have been permitted for development. We currently plan to begin completion activities on the 1.9 net wells later this spring. At year end prior to incorporating Lucero, total proved reserves for Vitesse were 40.3 million barrels of oil equivalent, proved developed reserves were 27.2 million Boe, while proved undeveloped reserves increased 8% to 13 million barrels of oil equivalent. Proved undeveloped reserves are limited to those locations that are reasonably certain to be developed over the next five years. However, we believe our acreage also includes extensive undeveloped drilling and completion locations not currently classified as proved. Vitesse's total proved reserves at year end had a PV-10 value of $586.6 million with 78% being proved developed. Year-end 2024 reserves were impacted by the reduction in the net realized oil and natural gas prices used in accordance with SEC rules. Net realized prices decreased by $4.09 a barrel for oil and $0.51 per Mcf for natural gas between 2023 and 2024. Including our internal estimates of Lucero reserves using the same pricing, the pro forma PV-10 value would have been just over $800 million. To mitigate the impact of these commodity price changes for 2025, we have approximately 53% of our oil production hedged at a weighted average price of $71.16 per barrel at the midpoint of our guidance. For the first time since going public, we added natural gas hedges to take advantage of the increase in natural gas prices and the call skew present in Henry Hub costless collars. We have 15% of our natural gas production now hedged at a weighted average floor of $3.73 and a weighted average ceiling of $4.88 per MMBtu, again based on the midpoint of our guidance. For the same volumes, we swapped a basis differential to increase the effectiveness of our natural gas hedge. In addition to these volumes, we have over 2,500 barrels per day and 8,000 MMBtu per day of our 2026 oil and natural gas production hedge at roughly $67 per barrel and through a costless collar of $3.71 by $4.47 per MMBtu. Thanks for your time. Now I'll turn the call over to our CFO, Jimmy Henderson.

Good morning, everyone. Thanks, Brian. I will provide a quick review of our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024, as well as an update on our financial status. Please refer to our earnings release and 10-K which we filed last night for any further details. Our production for the quarter was just under 13,000 Boe per day with a 68% oil cut. This brought our total 2024 production to 13,003 Boe per day with a 69% oil cut. These amounts were just within guidance as some of our larger working interest wells were not brought online during the fourth quarter but shifted into early 2025. For the year, adjusted EBITDA was $156.8 million and adjusted net income was $35.7 million. GAAP net income was $21.1 million, and you can see the reconciliation of that in our press release that we filed last night. Cash CapEx and acquisition costs combined for the year were at the midpoint of our revised guidance of $115.2 million. These costs were funded within operating cash flows as well as draws on our credit facility. At the end of 2024, we had total debt of $117 million with net debt to adjusted full year EBITDA of just 0.7 times. In connection with the closing of Lucero, we increased our borrowing base to $315 million with the aggregate elected commitments also increased to $250 million. Thanks as always to all the banks and our syndicate for their continued support. The Lucero closing further strengthened our balance sheet as they had no borrowings and held a net cash position of approximately $50 million at the close. This transaction also had the benefits of increasing our public float while maintaining meaningful insider holdings. Vitesse insiders now own more than 25% of the company. We are also providing guidance for 2025. On a two-stream basis, we anticipate production in the range of 17,000 to 18,000 Boe per day for the full year, an increase of approximately 35% at the midpoint versus 2024 levels. We anticipate an oil cut of 66% to 70%. With the Lucero transaction closed in March, production for the first quarter is expected to range from 14,000 to 15,000 Boe per day. And cash CapEx for the year is anticipated at $130 million to $150 million, weighted more towards the first half of the year as the larger working interest wells are brought online. This includes the completion of two drilled uncompleted wells that Brian mentioned earlier and approximately $20 million of expected acquisitions during the year. Remember that production and CapEx can be lumpy during the year and they were not held to a fixed capital budget but will always allocate capital to the highest rate of return projects. We are very excited to have Lucero as part of the Vitesse team. The effort put into the closing of the transaction was readily apparent and we look forward to seeing the value this hard work will produce as we move forward together. With that, let me turn the call over to the operator for Q&A.

Our first question comes from Jeff Grampp with Alliance Global Partners. Please state your question.

Good morning, guys.

Hey, Jeff.

Was curious Bob, to get your perspective on the acquisition side of the world or ground game. Obviously, you guys get a nice chunk of cash from Lucero and de-lever the balance sheet and free up some liquidity amidst some volatile oil markets that I imagine could be lucrative from an acquisition standpoint. So does this maybe lead you guys to perhaps be a bit more aggressive on the ground game acquisition front, given those dynamics or how might you think about that strategy in the context of kind of the improvements on the balance sheet side?

Yeah. Hi, Jeff, and thanks for the question. When we look at the screen every day of the oil price, when we see it starting with a six, that is very advantageous for us on the acquisition front. Oil in the 60s allows our current assets to perform very well. And I will tell you, we have not seen this much deal flow in something that's a little chunkier since we've been public. So again, we'll be very methodical. We waited a couple of years for Lucero, but I'm telling you that's a great question. Oil in the 60s is a sweet spot for us, Jeff.

Great. I appreciate those details. And maybe switching from offense to defense, curious to get updated on kind of the dividend philosophy. Obviously, we have the increase with the transaction here and you guys have some nice hedges for the next couple of years, but to the extent you use your balance sheet to maintain that dividend, is that something you guys are comfortable with in kind of the near and medium term, provided leverage is still low or like what are the toggles or variables that you guys are kind of looking for that we should look for that might necessitate revisiting the dividend plan if it's at any point? Thanks.

Yeah, no, thanks, Jeff. Look, our product is our dividend and everything we do is focused on supporting that dividend and growing that dividend. So we are risk managers; we do have hedges, but the biggest risk management is how economically we spend our capital. So you need to remember, everyone needs to remember, when the price of oil goes down, our drilling and completion costs go down. So it's a dynamic process. It's almost impossible to figure out what a quote-unquote breakeven is. So as the price of oil goes down, our CapEx will go down, and that is beneficial to our coverage ratio. So in a band of $55 to $85 oil, our dividend is solid.

All right, that's really helpful. Thank you for the time.

Thanks, Jeff.

Your next question comes from Bobby Brooks with Northland Capital Markets. Please state your question.

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for taking my question. I would like to build on Jeff's inquiry regarding the M&A outlook. In the press release, you noted that you are operationally and financially prepared to pursue additional acquisitions, and that the CapEx guidance includes $20 million for incremental acquisitions. I am curious about what this $20 million entails. Additionally, as you consider your acquisition strategy moving forward, are you expanding in terms of size and geographical focus compared to your previous targets since going public?

Yes, the answer to your second question is definitely. Our previous experience as operators gives us significant acquisition capability, allowing us to assess a wider range of opportunities. We are actively seeking alpha wherever it may be available. With the current state of gas prices, we are now considering gas assets that we previously overlooked. While we have always explored opportunities outside of our core area, the Bakken remains our primary focus, and we believe there are still opportunities for acquisition there. Brian, would you like to add anything?

Yeah, and I'll just kind of touch on the fact that you guys have seen us do quite a few acquisitions over the past few years. We're constantly looking at that ground game. We're looking at opportunities. Bob talked about oil prices being in the 60s. We're seeing lots of deals. We'll continue to evaluate all of these deals. For us, there was a question earlier about whether or not we'd be more aggressive with the cash on our balance sheet. I don't think that we ever really get aggressive. We have a rate of return hierarchy that we talked about earlier. We're going to stick with that. And as opportunities present themselves, we will definitely take advantage of those. But certainly as we think about our guidance and our budgets for the year, we do build in those acquisitions and they can take many different forms. I mean, we may find something that's more of a PDP type acquisition. We may find near-term development. We're looking at a variety of things right now and we're pretty highly confident that we'll get some of those closed during the course of the year.

We do not have a CapEx budget. We guide simply because of what our expectations can be, but with our capital structure we will seek highly economic things when we can find them. So, Jimmy, do you want to add anything? Okay, so.

You guys covered it.

Yeah. Good.

Yeah, no, that was great color. I appreciate it. And just wanted to kind of circle back on the $20 million of that, and I know you said you give the CapEx guides just for expectation purposes, but any color that you could give on, like what the expectation is of that $20 million? Is that just more ground game, smaller acquisition stuff or is it something a bit more, or is it something for maybe a bit chunkier like you mentioned?

Yeah, Bobby, I think that Brian covered it pretty well. That can take many different forms. Given where we are now, that we wanted to put a number out there, what our expectations are, given line of sight to things that are available, but it can take the form of several different styles of acquisitions. But we look at everything from chunkier deals, it could be the entire $20 million to several smaller deals that total up to that. So I hate to put you off a little bit, but it's just a placeholder for things that we think that we can pull down during the year.

No, fair enough. That makes sense. And then as you mentioned, you guys are looking at things outside the Bakken, right? And I wanted to kind of maybe tie it into like Luminis, I'm going to say this wrong. Your system, Luminis, and it kind of how you can leverage because my understanding is it's really kind of focused on well data within the Bakken, or is it a bit more broad than that and kind of the advantages that you get using that for deals within the Bakken, is that something that you can leverage as you look outside of it?

Absolutely, Bobby. It's Luminis, and we take great pride in that as it continues to expand every day. We gather massive amounts of data, including for the Haynesville, Mid-Con, Permian, DJ, and Powder. It's a very powerful tool that allows us to analyze deals with thousands of wells in just days. We rely heavily on Luminis, and it's crucial that it evolves into an even more powerful resource in the future.

Fair enough. The last question I have is about your capital allocation strategy focused on the highest return assets. Considering that, does the addition of Lucero-operated acreage affect the potential of some of the non-operated inventory? I'm trying to understand how the inclusion of Lucero acreage might influence your approach to managing your inventory over the next few years.

Brian?

I believe this change provides us with greater flexibility. We now have an operated asset that competes with our non-operated ones. As we've mentioned before, we don't have a fixed budget. We'll invest capital wherever we believe it will yield the best returns. The operated asset includes several promising drilling locations that are now part of our inventory. For 2025, our current plan is to focus only on completing the two drilled but uncompleted wells. However, we will keep evaluating those drilling opportunities. At the moment, they are included in our plans for 2026, but we will continuously assess them as new non-operated opportunities arise.

Fair enough. Thank you guys for taking the questions and congrats on the great year.

Thanks, Bobby.

Your next question comes from John White with Roth Capital Partners. Please state your question.

Good morning and congratulations on closing the deal and your strong 2024 results.

Thank you, John.

What percentage of Lucero properties are operated?

Basically 100% of the assets. They do have some very, very minor non-operated working interests, but the vast majority of their interests are all operated properties.

Okay, and reading the operations update, it looks like the Lucero working interest is much higher than legacy Vitesse acreage?

It is, John. Remember that our average working interest in our 7,000 properties is roughly 3%. But when you bring in the 60 to 65 producing wells that Lucero has an interest in, their average working interest is going to be closer to 75% to 80% in those properties.

Okay, so I read that right.

You did.

All right. Well, thanks for the answers, and I'll pass it back to the operator.

Thank you, John.

Our next question comes from Noel Parks with Tuohy Brothers. Please state your question.

Hi, good morning. Sorry if this has already been addressed, but can you discuss the current status of infrastructure in the basin regarding both gas and oil takeaway? I'm more interested in what is aging and might need attention rather than the footprint itself.

Hey Noel, this is Jimmy. Thanks for the question. Overall, I believe the Bakken is performing well as a mature basin. Regarding oil takeaway, we're in a strong position. We are affected by various markets and sources of oil, such as those coming from Canada. However, we don't face issues moving oil out of the basin. For natural gas, we definitely need more gas processing and particularly more capacity for NGL takeaway. Right now, it's a balancing act to recover enough ethane to fill the gas pipes and transport NGLs efficiently. We could use more capacity on that end. Overall, I'd say we're in a good position given the current level of activity and the rig count in the basin.

Thank you. I have a question for clarification. While reviewing the slides, I noticed the pie chart displaying the range of operators, and I was surprised that the market is still not more concentrated. There is still significant fragmentation, as even the largest operators do not seem to hold a dominant share. Are the private operators too focused on securing returns and managing their existing wells to consolidate further, or might we see some long-awaited exits soon?

I will start with that. This is Brian, and I'll let Bob or Jimmy add their thoughts. There has been significant consolidation, and we've seen our initial interest in about 40 operators reduced to around 30. This consolidation has taken place, and if we consider production instead of acreage, we now have about five operators that account for approximately 75% of our total production. The consolidation has occurred and is likely to continue. I believe there are other companies that will probably find ways to consolidate over the next few years, as it's a smart and effective business strategy.

Right. And somebody else wanted to add something I thought.

I think Brian covered it pretty well.

Okay, great. Thanks a lot.

Thanks, Noel.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'll hand the floor back to Bob Gerrity for closing remarks.

I want to thank everyone for taking their time today and we look forward to the next call that we have with you. In the interim, if you have any questions, please contact Ben directly, and thank you.

Thank you. With that, we conclude today's call. All participants may disconnect. Have a good day.