Welcome to the Adient First Quarter Fiscal Year 2023 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mark Oswald. Thank you.

Thank you, Danielle. Good morning, and thank you for joining us as we review Adient's results for Q1 fiscal 2023. The press release and presentation slides for our call today have been posted to the Investors section of our website at adient.com. This morning, I'm joined by Doug Del Grosso, Adient's President and Chief Executive Officer; Jerome Dorlack, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. On today's call, Doug will provide an update on the business, followed by Jerome, who will review our Q1 financial results and outlook for the remainder of fiscal '23. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call to your questions. Before I turn the call over to Doug and Jerome, there are a few items I'd like to cover. First, today's conference call will include forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the environment as we see it today and therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. I would caution you that our actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements made on the call. Please refer to Slide 2 of the presentation for our complete safe harbor statement. In addition to the financial results presented on a GAAP basis, we will be discussing non-GAAP information that we believe is useful in evaluating the company's operating performance. Reconciliations for these non-GAAP measures to the closest GAAP equivalent can be found in the appendix of our full earnings release. This concludes my comments. I'll now turn the call over to Doug.

Great. Thanks, Mark. Good morning. Thank you to our investors, prospective investors and analysts joining the call this morning as we review our first quarter results for fiscal 2023. Turning to Slide 4, let me begin with a few comments related to the quarter. As expected, heading into fiscal 2023, the overall operating environment appears to be trending in a positive direction. However, I'd still characterize the environment in Q1 as choppy with certain external influences trending favorably and other influences appearing stubbornly persistent, placing downward pressure on the industry. With regard to the positives, it was encouraging to see softening steel, energy and freight costs, and FX movements also trended favorably. While these metrics signaled that we're moving in the right direction, other challenges such as the resurgence of COVID-19 in China, elevated labor costs, tight labor availability and tightening monetary policies continue to cloud the outlook. Visibility remains murky, that said, the balance of the many puts and takes resulted in a quarter generally in line with our internal expectations. Key financial metrics for the quarter can be seen on the right-hand side of the slide. Revenue for the quarter, which totaled $3.7 billion was up $219 million compared to last year's first quarter. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter totaled $12 million, up $66 million. Adient ended the quarter with a strong cash balance and total liquidity of $900 million and $1.9 billion respectively. In addition to Q1 fiscal '23 improved year-on-year financial results, Adient continues to execute actions within its control to position the company for sustained financial success. These actions include but are not limited to the team's intense focus on launch execution, cost and operational improvement and customer profitability management. Winning new business across various regions, customers and platforms, which over time are expected to strengthen our leading market position not to mention support improved margins and earnings. The team is also executing actions to provide value add to Adient's stakeholders every day. Whether that's our customers, suppliers or employees, these efforts have been validated repeatedly with numerous industry and customer recognition awards including most recently the Automotive News Champion of Diversity Award and Top Employer 2023 Certification by the Top Employer Institute for Adient EMEA. And recognition in China from FAW-VW for our quality performance. Finally, Adient continues to make progress at building a sustainable future, the details of our many ongoing ESG initiatives as well as our fiscal year 2022 accomplishments are included in the company's recently published Sustainability Report. Turning to Slide 5 and commenting further on the topic, the 2022 Sustainability Report highlights among other things how Adient is reducing its Scope 1 and Scope 2 absolute greenhouse gas emissions, which as shown on the lower right-hand side of the slide are down 25% compared with our baseline year for fiscal 2019. We are implementing innovative seat solutions, including materials and processes in our metals, plastic, foam, trim and complete seat products that promote a circular economy and help Adient's customers meet their ESG goals. Enforcing policies and practices that protect human rights in accordance with the UN Global Compact, and encouraging our suppliers to adopt similar business practices. Advancing diversity, equity and inclusion through employee training opportunities, inclusive hiring and employment development processes, and employee-led business resource groups. Recognizing a diverse and inclusive workforce environment has been part of Adient for years. For more than two decades, the company has been involved in successful diverse joint ventures with Detroit-based Bridgewater Interiors. We are particularly proud that this forward-thinking unique joint venture has stood the test of time, continues to grow, and remains a viable venture for our customers. One additional milestone to mention during Q1 fiscal year '23, the science-based target initiatives validated Adient's near-term greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets, affirming that Adient has established a clear pathway to achieving its emissions reduction goals. We realize that reaching the company's full potential cannot be achieved without firmly integrating sustainability into Adient's core operations in order to become the foremost sustainable automotive supplier. We've included a link to the full report. Please take a few minutes to see the progress we've made in our sustainability journey and the commitments we intend to deliver in the future. Turning to Slides 6 and 7, now let's take a look at the business wins and launch performance. As you can see, Slide 6 highlights a few recent Adient wins. Adient continues to successfully navigate the choppy operating environment and related commercial discussions by winning new and replacement business. Programs highlighted represent a good mix of wins across ICE in various levels of EV, powertrains, new entrants, and legacy customers, as well as deepening levels of vertical integration including complete seat, foam, trim and metals. One of the programs highlighted is the recently awarded Toyota Rav4 replacement business in China. Also worth noting is that NIO's new Alps vehicle platform was awarded to Adient, strengthening the company's position with growing Chinese domestic OEMs. Alps is NIO's latest sub-brand, marking an entrance into the mass market outside of the premium/luxury space. One final highlight to mention, as noted in the call-out box to the right, Adient is pleased to provide a complete seat or components to all three 2023 North American Car and Truck of the Year winners: Acura Integra, Ford F-150 Lightning and KIA EV6. Looking to Slide 7, as we typically do we've highlighted several critical launches that are complete, in process, or scheduled to begin in the near term. I'm happy to report that launches currently underway are progressing in line with our expectations. The launches and platforms shown not only impact Adient's just-in-time facilities but span across our network of foam, trim, and metals facilities. The team continues to focus process discipline around launch readiness, which has driven a very high level of performance, especially considering the launch load and complexity of launches that are planned for the year. We have no intention of letting up. Before turning the call over to Jerome and turning to Slide 8, let me continue with a few comments related to the current environment and how it has evolved over the past few months. If you recall, entering fiscal year '23, Adient expected the overall operating environment to improve in '23 versus '22. That expectation has not changed based on what has transpired in our first quarter. That said, certain of the underlying assumptions around variance influences that were expected to have a significant impact on Adient's '23 results have shifted. As you can see on the slide, we laid out certain positive and negative influences that we navigated entering the year. Many of the positives include Adient's self-help initiatives, the benefits from the balance in, balance out of new programs, the impact of supply chain disruptions, which are still placing downward pressure on the industry, but trending in the right direction. Commercial settlements with our customers, which encompass a variety of transactional items, including recovery of inflationary costs continue to be successfully negotiated. I would note that as certain inflationary pressures soften, the absolute level of recovery needed to achieve our '23 earnings commitment will be reduced, which is good news; think of that as de-risking our plan. Lastly, although we continue to forecast a year-on-year tailwind from increased vehicle production, the magnitude of benefits have moderated given the recent revisions to production forecasts. In China, for example, S&P recently lowered the forecast by approximately 500,000 units in the March quarter versus the third December forecast. Given Adient's September 30 fiscal end, the expected recovery, which is largely re-calendarized into the December quarter, will benefit our fiscal year '24, not fiscal year '23. On the right-hand side of the slide, just a few comments that we are seeing and expecting from the three key markets. In the Americas, we continue to monitor potential softening of consumer demand primarily driven by rising interest rates, which ultimately impacts affordability. That said, our customers have not signaled through their production forecast to us that this is the case. We believe inventory rebuild combined with the likely increase in sales initiatives should support the current vehicle build assumptions for the remainder of fiscal '23. In China, we're monitoring the return to work, absenteeism post-Lunar New Year given the potential resurgence of COVID. At this time absenteeism remains very low. Most of our facilities now have either low single-digit cases or no cases at all and we're managing them as normal absenteeism. Although vehicle production was revised down in our fiscal second quarter, as I just mentioned, we believe solid economic growth and the absence of COVID restrictions will support improved production beginning in the back half of the year. For Europe, the outlook remains bleak, lacking positive catalysts for the near-term and long-term. In fact, based on S&P forecast vehicle production is not expected to return to pre-COVID levels in the foreseeable future. With that as a backdrop, the team is working on plans to improve the company's operating and financial performance in the region, assuming production remains at these depressed levels. Actions will be broad-based encompassing our operations, plant costs, future capital spending, etc. I'll provide additional details as the plan takes shape. Bottom line, we're focusing on executing our strategy, which we're confident will drive earnings, margin, and cash flow growth in '23 and beyond. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jerome to take us through Adient's first quarter 2023 financial performance and provide our current thoughts on what to expect as we progress through the remainder of fiscal '23.

Thanks, Doug. Let's jump into the financials on Slide 10. Adhering to our typical format, the pages are formatted with our reported results on the left and our adjusted results on the right side. We will focus our commentary on the adjusted results which exclude special items that we view as either one-time in nature or otherwise skew important trends and underlying performance. For the quarter, the biggest drivers of the difference between our reported results and our adjusted results relate to purchasing, accounting, amortization, restructuring, impairment costs and a pension mark-to-market as we settled certain pension plans in the Americas segment and recorded a curtailment settlement loss. Details of the adjustment for the quarter are in the appendix of the presentation. High level for the quarter, sales were approximately $3.7 billion, up about 6% compared to our first quarter results last year. Improving vehicle production in the Americas combined with favorable customer mix in China were the primary drivers of the year-over-year increase. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $212 million, up $66 million year-on-year. The increase is primarily attributed to the benefits associated with higher volume and mix, improved business performance and commercial recoveries. These benefits were partially offset by the impact of increased business operating costs and the negative impact of currency movements between the two periods. I'll expand on these key drivers in just a minute. Finally, at the bottom line, Adient reported an adjusted net income of $33 million or $0.34 per share. Let's break down the first-quarter results in more detail. I'll cover the next few slides rather quickly as the detail for the results are included on the slides and this should ensure we have an adequate amount of time set aside for the Q&A portion of the call. Starting with revenue on Slide 11, we reported consolidated sales of approximately $3.7 billion, an increase of $219 million compared with Q1, FY '22. The primary driver of the year-over-year increase was higher volume and pricing of about $430 million, including about $15 million of higher commodity recoveries. The negative impact of FX movement between the two periods impacted the quarter by $211 million focusing on the table on the right-hand side of the slide. Adient's consolidated sales for the Americas and China significantly outpaced production. Americas' growth over market was primarily driven by outperformance on key platforms that we were launching in last year's first quarter, such as the Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti QX60, and Toyota Tundra, plus the benefit of increased commercial recoveries. In China, Adient's strong customer mix supported our growth over market, specifically our business with Beijing Benz, GAMC, and NIO. In Asia outside of China, the story is similar to the Americas where last year's volumes were depressed due to program launches, and our customer mix was disproportionately impacted by chip shortages. Europe's modest underperformance was in line with internal expectations, primarily reflecting our decision a few years back to walk away from certain unprofitable business in the region. With regards to Adient's unconsolidated seating revenue year-over-year results were down about 9% adjusted for FX. In China, where a large majority of Adient's unconsolidated sales are derived, the resurgence of COVID had a significant impact on certain of our customers' production schedules, namely FAW and FCW. Partially offsetting the lower unconsolidated sales in China was improved volume and sales at our unconsolidated JVs in the Americas and EMEA. Moving to Slide 12, we've provided a bridge of adjusted EBITDA to show the performance of our segments between periods. The bucket labeled corporate represents central costs that are not allocated back to the operations, such as executive office, communications, corporate finance, and legal. Big picture adjusted EBITDA was $212 million in the current quarter versus $146 million reported a year ago. The primary drivers of the year-on-year comparison are detailed on the page and are consistent with what we expected heading into the quarter. Positive influences included $59 million associated with increased volume and mix. Improved business performance also benefited the quarter by $24 million. Looking deeper within that bucket, the biggest positive driver was improved net material margin of $59 million. In addition, improved launch operations waste and tooling performance provided a $5 million benefit. Partial offsets within business performance were utility and wage inflation, which negatively impacted the quarter by $27 million. Freight was also a headwind, calling it $13 million. Outside of business performance, Adient's SG&A costs were $11 million lower year-on-year, primarily driven by temporary compensation-related savings and one-time benefits associated with minor asset sales, specifically certain minor footprint changes. The compensation-related savings should not be included in the forward run rate as certain benefits, such as the 401(k) match in the Americas were reinstated in January of 2023. Headwinds impacting the year-on-year comparison included higher net commodity prices, calling it $18 million, the majority of which impacted our EMEA segment. The negative impact of currency movements between the two periods was about $7 million. Although we expect FX to be a headwind for the quarter and full year, recent currency movements suggest FX will have less of a negative impact on Adient's 2023 results versus our expectations at the beginning of the fiscal year. I'll have additional commentary on what to expect for the remainder of the year in just a few minutes. And finally, given the lower volume and sales at our unconsolidated JVs, and to a lesser extent, Adient's restructured pricing agreement announced last quarter, equity income was lower year-on-year by $3 million. All in all, a quarter very much in line with our internal expectations driven from the continued strong execution and performance of our global team. Similar to past quarters, we've provided detailed segment performance slides in the appendix of the presentation. High level for the Americas, several positive factors drove the year-on-year increase and included improved volume and mix, improved business performance driven by increased net material margin, which was aided by commercial recoveries and to a lesser extent the restructured pricing agreement at our Keiper JV. Other movements within business performance included the benefits associated with launch, waste, and tooling performance, not to mention a slight tailwind related to the improving operating environment, which resulted in lower inefficiencies versus a year ago. Increased freight was a partial offset to these business performance benefits. Lower SG&A costs, primarily driven by compensation-related savings also contributed to the year-on-year improvement. In EMEA, the year-over-year comparison was influenced by several factors such as improved SG&A performance, which included the one-time benefit of minor real estate asset sales, increased equity income resulting from improved volumes at our unconsolidated JVs and a modest improvement from volume and mix. More than offsetting these benefits were headwinds related to increased commodity costs and lower business performance. Within business performance, utility and wage inflation, combined with increased non-ocean freight weighed on the quarter. Partial offsets included higher net material margin, aided by commercial recoveries and benefits associated with improved launch operations waste and tooling. In Asia, the benefit of higher volumes and mix at our consolidated entities combined with improved business performance were partially offset by unfavorable FX movements. Equity income was also lower as our unconsolidated JVs were impacted by broadly reduced volumes in China. Let me now shift to our cash, liquidity, and capital structure on Slides 13 and 14. Starting with cash on Slide 13, adjusted free cash flow defined as operating cash flow less CapEx was an outflow of $17 million. This compares to an outflow of $74 million last year's first quarter. The year-on-year improvement and positive outcome was hard-fought, especially considering the choppy operating environment and normal seasonality pattern of Adient's cash flow. The primary drivers of the year-on-year improvement included a higher level of consolidated earnings underpinned by improved volumes and an incrementally improving operating environment, coupled with lower levels of cash interest, which was in line with internal expectations given our successful deleveraging efforts. Partial offsets included typical month-to-month working capital movements, the timing and level of commercial settlements and VAT deferrals and payments and planned increases in engineering spend to support our growth in customer launch activity. One last point is called out on the slide; Adient continues to utilize factoring programs as a low-cost source of liquidity. At December 31, 2022, we had $181 million of factored receivables versus $218 million at last year's first quarter end. Flipping to Slide 14, as noted on the right-hand side of the slide, we ended the quarter with about $1.9 billion in total liquidity, comprised of cash on hand of $901 million and $971 million of undrawn capacity under Adient's revolving line of credit. Adient's debt and net debt position totaled about $2.6 billion and $1.7 billion respectively at December 31, 2022. The modest increase in gross debt compared with September 30, 2022, was driven by the recent appreciation of the euro and its direct impact on Adient's 2024, 3.5% Euro notes. Speaking of the 3.5% Euro notes, although those notes mature in August of 2024, they become current in August of this year. The team continues to monitor the credit markets and will look to refinance those at an appropriate time, obviously driven by market conditions, which have improved in early 2023 compared with late 2022. One last point before moving on and as noted on the slide, Adient continues to forecast free cash generation of about $200 million in FY 2023, underpinned by the Company's solid operational execution and intense focus on cash management and earnings growth. Given our significant deleveraging over the past few years, combined with our expected earnings and cash generation in FY23, Adient remains solidly on track to achieve its target leverage ratio of between 1.5 times to 2 times net debt to adjusted EBITDA. With that, let's flip to slide 15 and review our outlook for the remainder of fiscal FY23. As Doug mentioned, the overall operating environment remains choppy with certain external influences trending favorably and other influences appearing stubbornly persistent, placing downward pressure on the industry. We are successfully navigating through the various obstacles and continue to expect the operating environment will be much improved in the latter part of 2023 versus the choppy conditions that exist today. That said, the pacing of the improvement is likely to be more back-end weighted versus the gradual improvement we expected when we provided our original guidance back in November. Changes to vehicle production schedules predominantly in China, which have been re-calendarized out of the current March quarter is the primary driver. With that as a backdrop, based on Adient's first quarter results and current market conditions, including revised production forecast and FX assumptions for the year, we currently forecast the following: Adient's consolidated sales to land at about $15 billion, up from our prior forecast of $14.7 billion. The increase is primarily driven by revised FX assumptions, particularly related to the euro which has appreciated from about 1.02 in November when we provided our original guidance to around 1.08 today. For adjusted EBITDA, we continue to forecast approximately $850 million. That said, the composition between consolidated earnings and equity income has been revised. Given the lower level of production forecast at certain of our unconsolidated JVs, equity income is revised down to about $70 million versus the November guidance of $90 million. That said, Adient's consolidated EBITDA is now forecast to be about $780 million, which would imply an EBITDA margin excluding equity income of about 5.2%, consistent with our earlier guidance and a 100 basis point improvement above fiscal 2022. Important to note that the re-calendarization of production in China from the current quarter has significant impacts on equity income and to a lesser extent consolidated results in China given our favorable customer mix. We expect Adient's Q2 EBITDA to fall short of the $212 million Q1 result just announced today, largely driven by the drop in equity income which is forecast at less than $10 million in Q2 versus the $27 million for the quarter just completed. This would now represent the trough in fiscal 2023 earnings. Moving on, interest expense is still expected at about $160 million given our expected debt and cash balances as well as interest rate expectations, cash taxes, thanks to various tax planning initiatives continues to be forecast at around $90 million. CapEx, largely based on customer launch schedules, is forecast at $300 million, no change from the November guidance. Finally, our improved earnings combined with our reduced calls for cash, such as the benefits associated with our deleveraging and relatively flat cash taxes are expected to underpin free cash generation of about $200 million. Again, no change from November. With that, let's move on to the Q&A portion of the call.

Our first question today comes from Rod Lache with Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Good morning, everyone. I wanted to clarify something. Your initial guidance for fiscal 2023 included approximately $180 million in commodity and other headwinds, which you planned to offset with $50 million to $70 million in recoveries and just over $100 million in performance. It seems that the $180 million headwind is now lower, and I'd appreciate it if you could provide some insight on that. More generally, as some of these headwinds shift from commodities to issues like labor and energy, could you share your thoughts on how the recovery discussions might be changing?

I will address the second part of your question first and then return to the specifics. When we shift our focus from issues related to materials to those concerning labor and energy, it creates a different conversation with our customers. This is a type of recovery that they aren’t used to having because we have never faced such a spike in inflation in these two areas. It's quite different from our discussions about steel economics, which we have continued even at the inflated levels we've seen in recent years. Overall, the discussions are progressing positively, and we are making headway, though there's still a lot of work to be done to fully resolve these issues. We were transparent with our customers from the start and addressed the issues clearly. We’ve made solid progress in engaging and discussing these matters, but, as I mentioned, there is still work ahead, and some customers are more resistant to these discussions.

Yes. To address your first question, Rod, regarding the costs in the system, I will focus on what we see for 2023. We estimate around $200 million in costs that fall between net income and other persistent costs, balanced by about $100 million in recoveries, which fluctuate based on different types of recoveries we experience. We notice improvements in ocean freight and energy. However, although ocean freight may return to 2020 levels, we do not expect energy costs to decrease back to 2022 levels anytime soon. Labor costs are stable and are not expected to decrease. Therefore, as Doug mentioned, we need to intensify our recovery efforts with our customers. While energy costs might be easing, other costs are increasing that we need to address with our customers. This situation requires a comprehensive discussion on various cost factors. Does that address your questions?

That is helpful. Jerome, could you rephrase your previous comments for clarity? In 2022, you mentioned that the $675 million of EBITDA included $400 million from volume challenges, $100 million in persistent costs, and another $100 million in temporary costs. It appears you are indicating that the $200 million in costs is being balanced by about $100 million, and there is still another $100 million expected as we look ahead to 2024. Am I understanding that correctly?

Yes, I think that's a fair way to interpret that.

Okay. And then just lastly, the conversion on volume and price is still a bit under 14% below historical levels. Is there anything that's unusual just relative to launches or anything else? Because I thought that the margins on some of these new launches would be higher just given the complexity that you're absorbing.

Yes, in an ideal operating environment, that would be correct. However, we are still far from ideal, and there continues to be a lot of stop-and-start in our production environment. We are not achieving what I would classify as optimized efficiencies due to this inconsistent nature. For example, in China, during what would have been our first quarter, we faced COVID-related impacts, particularly in the North, which then affected the South. In Europe, several of our customers are still experiencing significant disruptions. Even in October and November, our schedule attainment with many customers was still in the low '80s range. December improved, but the overall situation is still not a normal operating environment that would allow us to achieve 16% to 18% leverage on volume as we usually would.

I think, on top of that, when you think about it from a mix standpoint, and the impact China's having, that's a bit of a negative for us. So as that volume improves, that contribution margin should also improve.

Thank you.

Thank you. Thanks, Rod.

Our next question comes from Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Just to follow up on that, I just want to make sure I got the key drivers. You're holding full-year guidance, but it sounds like sticky costs are up around $20 million, JV income is down $20 million and that's offset by $540 million and higher recoveries than you're expecting. Any other factors we should be thinking about from the change from last quarter?

No. I mean, I think that's probably fair from that standpoint, Colin. I think the biggest driver is really looking at kind of the equity income piece of it. And what's happening in China with employee income and the re-calendarization of the volume portion of it is the larger piece of that.

Okay. And you bring up China. So one of the surprises I think in the quarter is your Asia margins are actually extremely good. Anything unusual going on in this quarter, that's not sustained? Because actually lockdowns in calendar Q4 would have actually kind of messed with the margins in that segment. And yet, they seem to hold on pretty well?

Yes, no, there were certain one-time commercial settlements in the quarter. And our own internal operations that will not repeat. And that's really what drove the margin within the quarter within our China operation.

That in top of Asia is China and all of our other Asian business, which has not been impacted by COVID. Has not done a year-over-year basis been disrupted like it was a year ago last. We're on the plus side of launches, roll-in, rollout has been favorable in that albeit on a smaller revenue base. That's helped to offset some of the China impact.

Got it. And just lastly, you mentioned in the comments about potential more Europe restructuring actions. Would that be reflected in the current guidance or if you take additional actions and save costs, that would be sort of upside to the outlook?

Yes, it would be incremental to the current guidance. And so, we're in the midst of that right now. If you look back two, three years ago, we took on a fairly significant amount of, I think it was some $200 million of restructuring, anticipating a revenue level in the region that's really not recovered to that level. So as we kind of recalibrate and reset, we're trying to assess whether there's additional actions that need to be taken. There'll be more to come on that if we decide that's the direction we want to move in.

Got it. All right, thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you.

Welcome.

Our next question comes from the line of John Murphy with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Good morning, guys. I just wanted to follow up on the volatility and schedules that Rod touched on, I think you guys were getting to a little bit. I mean, even at the beginning of this year in January, it sounds like there's fits and starts and volatility already. It doesn't seem like it's something that's going to ease anytime soon. How should we think about what the actual cost of that volatility was? I mean, you guys were talking about flow through being depressed at 14% on volume and mix. Maybe it should be closer to 18%. Is it that four points on flow through kind of the way to think about it or is there a dollar number in the quarter and for FY 2022 that you could give us so we can think about how to walk off what something might be more normal?

Yes, I think that 400 basis points seems a little high to me. I think we'd have to circle back if we're really going to pinpoint a number for you on that. I would suggest though that we do see volume improving from just a start, start standpoint. I think it depends on where your baseline is that you want to measure that from. But the schedules we're seeing from our customers are far stronger. There's far less disruptions that we've experienced, I'll say a year ago, nine months ago. There was a time that we were building to about 70% of what the customer was releasing to us on a regular basis. And I think that number is much higher now, probably above 85%. I mean, if you think about kind of sequentially as we go throughout the year, quarter-over-quarter to put in what we expect from improvement. It certainly isn't anything like 400 basis points. When we think about kind of the March as we go forward, we've always said it's a 100 basis points from volume, a 100 basis points from kind of performance and then 100 basis points of what I'd call kind of balance in, balance out management of our key programs. So in that, 100 basis points of what I'd call performance is where you'd see some of this premium and inefficiency coming out. And so it's not 400 to be in that 100 basis points bucket, a subset of it.

Okay, all right, that's helpful. And then just second, I mean, I know this is kind of a morbid and weird question, but it does sound like you're through the worst of the COVID wave in your plants. We've heard that from other suppliers in the industry. So as we go forward, I mean, obviously there are economic concerns in China. But as far as the COVID disruption, do you think you're clear of the worst of it at the moment on the reopening?

I think that would be a bit optimistic, just based on the fact that we've just returned from Lunar New Year. All the early indications are positive. We were very concerned whether we were going to get the return to work that we had planned for a worse case. It was far better. The employee center plants appear to be healthy. So there's some indication that perhaps the virus has kind of burned through if you will, and we're more dealing with natural immunities. But we'll never claim to be COVID experts. And if you look at mutations and could there be another wave, we've all seen that it's a pretty unpredictable virus. So we're taking a lot of precautionary measures talking to the team there. They're relatively optimistic that life seems back to normal. Those are all really encouraging signs. But I think we're kind of more on the let's wait and see how this plays over the coming weeks and months before we get over our skis on it.

Yes, that's a fair statement. Lastly, can you just talk about new business wins and how they're going sort of versus history and how we should think about the book business building and also just kind of remind us if we're truly through all the less economic contracts from days ago when we're actually working into more - sort of large majority of portfolio being more normalized contracts though, new business wins and where we are sort of weighted, sort of average of uneconomic to rework contracts?

Yes, we're really - the rework contracts are really kind of building out some of the ugly contracts that we had in place. And there's a tail on that. It gets smaller as time goes on. With regard to new business wins, we feel very good about where we're at with our new business wins. We've been able to push back on commercial issues and support that with really outstanding performance with our customers. Such that we can have thoughtful discussions on where we go and kind of have a reasonable expectation on recoveries and not at the expense of the backlog. With regard to the wins, not all customers are created equal and the ones new business that we want to win are with the customers that are near and dear to us. We've been extremely successful with. And again, we clearly will walk away from business that we think financially doesn't make sense, even if it's replacement business. We've done that in the past. We think that's been the smart move for us. We'll continue to do that in the future. And then when we look at China, I think what's difficult to predict when you start to build your backlog is really what the mix of that business is going to look like in the future with all the new entrants. We're excited about the wins that we have there, but we have to be really thoughtful where we invest our capital with those customers as we think that will be a pretty dynamic market over the course of the next five to ten years. But I feel great about where we're at with new business wins. I think we're making the right decisions. We're not trying to measure success solely on market share. We are really focused on return on invested capital to make sure that the business we win will get the recovery from an investment standpoint.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Emmanuel Rosner with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. Maybe to start picking up from where you just left it off on the business wins, so for this year, you have incorporated in guidance something like six points of gross above market, which is just impressive, but also fairly unprecedented. Can you really talk about again what the drivers are for this? And then how do you think about that metric on a go forward basis? Is some of the traction you're getting on new business sort of able to push up your growth of a market framework on a go forward basis or is it mostly as it was, and this year is more of a one-off?

Yes. This year, two main factors are driving our performance. First, in China, we previously mentioned on the Q4 call that several programs are launching this year. The timing of these programs, particularly with select customers like NIO, Xiaopeng, and Daimler, is positively impacting our results and is beneficial for our customer mix. Therefore, I wouldn't factor that into your terminal rate. Secondly, in the Americas, we've noted today that we are fully benefiting from the tender launch, including the S650 program for the Mustang, which we won as a conquest. Additionally, we are also benefiting from the Sequoia program, which is another conquest win. Timing is crucial this year regarding when these programs cycle in. I wouldn't incorporate the 6% into your calculations, but what's more significant is the quality of our wins. For instance, the Sequoia represents a complete value chain for us, including the jet, trim, foam, and metals, which are fully reused from the Tacoma and Tundra front row. The Mustang includes the jet, trim, and almost all the foam. In China, we serve as a full-service supplier, handling jet, trim, foam, and the kits designed for NIO and Xiaopeng. When we discuss growth, it's essential to recognize that not every dollar of revenue is the same; we emphasize what's behind that revenue. We want to ensure we have the jet for the topline, along with the trim and foam that support it, which is the focus of our strategy.

Great.

Doug, I don't know if you have anything else to add. But does that help to answer your question on that 6%, Emmanuel?

Yes, absolutely. That's great.

I think somewhere around that 100 to 200 basis points that you've normally used is more appropriate.

Thank you for clarifying that. Regarding the second question about costs, I understand you have ambitious goals for margins. Can you provide an estimate of the remaining cost inefficiencies by the end of 2023, assuming you meet your guidance? Specifically, what opportunities are there for improving costs, whether through volume adjustments or operational efficiencies?

I think it goes back to what John asked earlier. A little bit manual how we view it. If we look at our long-term goal for this business and where we think this business can run at circa 8%, 8.5%. It really breaks down to a third or third or third to bridge the gap between where we exit '23 and where we want to get to with a third of the gap coming from volume. So getting back to kind of the normalized LVS build level, the third of that gap closure comes from volume. A third of it comes from closing out the remaining, what I would call, sticky costs that are left in the business, whether that is labor, gap closure or ocean freight, returning back, the energy returning back, and the other transient costs in the business over the road-freight. If that doesn't come back, then it moves into the last third of the bucket, which is then business performance and us going and getting it either through balance-in balance-out or just commercial might, and us retrenching that through our commercial negotiations with our customers. It really does break down when we do our internal target setting to really a third, a third, a third in between those buckets. From there, you can say, okay, when does the industry get back to kind of a $90 million build, that's when the first third comes back? And if you look at ocean freight and some of the over-the-road freight where some of the indices are returning to, you can kind of say when the other third comes back and then our balance and balance out being the last third or commercial recoveries.

And I think I asked you that last quarter, but I guess some of these buckets at least sort of like two out of the three seem to be sort of essentially anticipating a progression for the industry and for the macro environment, which sort of like may or may not happen quickly. Is there an opportunity for you to sort of like to accelerate this, resize the business for a smaller industry or is your longer-term views in a more optimistic on the industry and therefore you should maintain sort of like your structure and your cost base the way it is now?

When I think about the situation, I focus on two regions, Asia and the Americas, where I feel fairly confident about our current cost structure. We believe there are no further actions needed in these areas. The main concern is Europe's recovery and how it might impact our breakeven profile and costs in that region, which we are currently evaluating. We've shown that we can quickly negotiate with our customers regarding non-volume related costs. If energy costs in Europe continue to decline, we may not need to recover those costs. However, if they remain, we will need to discuss with our customers that these are structural costs that were originally part of our business plan and need to be addressed.

Perfect, thank you.

Thank you.

Our final question comes from Adam Jonas with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Good morning, everyone. Evan Silverberg on behalf of Adam Jonas. Looking at the supply disruption being seen at the OE customers outside of COVID, are there any key issues your customers are highlighting?

I think the one issue that they continue to highlight to us is there is some residual electronics, more semiconductor-related that impact them and then the probably the biggest issue is supply chain labor. That's everywhere for different reasons in China. I think that's a bit of the concern on the recovery there is as you go through the supply chain, will labor be an issue there as workers return to work. Similarly in Europe, as we kind of recalibrate labor cost there and labor availability, particularly in Eastern Europe that can be disruptive to the supply chain, as well as in the U.S. Semiconductors, clearly, there is an improved level of performance there. Labor is still a bit of a wildcard. And it's just how it manifests itself within the supply chain and not only Tier 1 but Tier 2 and Tier 3.

Thanks for that. Obviously, you guys are a step removed from the semi-issue, but is there any color you can provide on whether the OEs are saying it's a specific type of semiconductor that's short or whether it's across the board? Thank you.

It's more the feedback we get, it's across the board. And no sooner that they think they have one issue solved, another issue arises that they didn't quite completely comprehend.

Great. Thanks, Evan. And Danielle, it looks like we're at the bottom of the hour. So, this will conclude the call today. If you have additional questions or any follow-up questions, Eric and I will be available. Just feel free to reach out and we'll talk soon. Thanks again for participating.

That concludes today's conference. Thank you all for your participation. You may disconnect at this time.