Good day, and welcome to the Alto Ingredients Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Kirsten Chapman with Alliance Advisors Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Asha, and thank you all for joining us for the Alto Ingredients Second Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. On the call today are President and CEO, Bryon McGregor; and CFO, Rob Olander. Alto Ingredients issued a press release after the market closed today, providing details of the company's financials for the second quarter of 2025. The company also has prepared a presentation for today's call that is available on the company's website at altoingredients.com. A telephone replay of today's call will be available through August 13, the details of which are included in today's press release. A webcast replay will also be available on Alto Ingredients' website. Please note the information on this call speaks only as of today, August 6, 2025, and you're advised that time-sensitive information may be no longer accurate at the time of any replay. Please refer to the company's safe harbor statement on Slide 2 of the presentation available online, which states that some of the comments in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements and considerations that involve risks and uncertainties. The actual future results of Alto Ingredients could differ materially from those statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, events, risks and other factors previously and from time to time disclosed in Alto Ingredients' filings with the SEC. Except as required by applicable law, the company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. In management's prepared remarks, non-GAAP measures will be referenced. Management uses these non-GAAP measures to monitor the financial performance of operations and believes these measures will assist investors in assessing the company's performance for the periods reported. The company defines adjusted EBITDA as consolidated net income or loss before interest expense, interest income, provision for income taxes, asset impairments, unrealized derivative gains and losses, acquisition-related expense and depreciation and amortization. To support the company's review of non-GAAP information, a reconciling table was included in today's press release. On today's call, Bryon will provide a review of our strategic plan and activities, and Rob will comment on our financial results. Then Bryon will wrap up and open the call for Q&A. It's now my pleasure to introduce CEO, Bryon McGregor. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Kirsten. Thank you all for joining us today. The main takeaway for Q2 is that our adjusted EBITDA improved by nearly $6 million compared to last year, reflecting the successful execution of our initiatives to increase productivity. For some time, we have been focusing on short-term projects with more immediate returns, and we see the roots taking hold and delivering success. This approach will support our path to incremental profitability and an improved future. Projects under evaluation will be prioritized by anticipated cost, timing and ROI impact. Under consideration are projects to lower our carbon intensity and capture more of the benefits of the 45Z regulations, increase our CO2 utilization at our Pekin campus and at Columbia, building on our successful Carbonic acquisition and improve our prospects to monetize our Western assets. Further, we will continue to pursue opportunities to improve efficiency and productivity like we did in Q1 and Q2. As a brief update to our carbon capture and storage project for our Pekin campus, on August 1, the Governor of Illinois signed Senate Bill 1723 that prohibits CO2 sequestration directly through the Mohammad Aquifer as contemplated in our EPA Class VI permit. As a result, we are developing alternatives with Walt as well as evaluating other promising non-sequestration options to optimize the value of our CO2 production. The bottom line is while we lay the groundwork for longer-term capital-intensive projects, we are focusing on executable strategies within our control with short-term paybacks and potential long-term benefits. Our adjusted EBITDA for Q2 compared to last year's quarter reflects the benefits of multiple initiatives. We generated positive gross profit at our Western assets resulting from the combination of our liquid CO2 facility acquisition, improvements at our Columbia ethanol plant and our decision to cold idle Magic Valley due to adverse market factors. Our Marketing and Distribution segment also improved, reflecting the integration of our bulk volume customers from our Eagle Alcohol business, fostering third-party ethanol marketing relationships that met profitability criteria and transitioning away from businesses that have limited returns. We note that our Pekin campus was negatively impacted by quarter-over-quarter changes in derivatives and the impact of the damage sustained to our load-out dock in April. However, we partially offset these effects by leveraging our operational flexibility at the Pekin campus by increasing sales of higher-margin ISCC products exported to Europe. I'll cover more on the dock in a moment. Company-wide, we improved our operational model by rightsizing our corporate overhead to a level that aligns with our current company footprint. Based on our Q2 results, we are on track to exceed our goal of saving approximately $8 million annually. We continue to evaluate options to improve operational efficiency and throughput, focus on growth in profitable market segments and identify additional cost-saving opportunities that, while smaller in amount, should, in the aggregate, make a real difference in the long run. Turning back to the Pekin campus. In early April, our load out dock sustained damage due to rapidly rising river levels, impacting production, logistics, and campus economics for most of Q2. Since our last call, we've made progress recovering from this setback in a few ways. First, we were able to respond quickly to take interim steps with third-party river transload vendors to minimize business interruption. Also, we worked with our insurance carrier to confirm coverage for both the property damage and business interruption. Finally, we're reviewing repair plans with our carrier to ensure the best path forward. We intend to commence the project ahead of Midwest winter and expect work to extend into next year. On markets and regulatory trends, the Big Beautiful Bill enacted in July made several positive updates too, including the 45Z credit extensions through the end of 2029 and spending on farm programs that are beneficial for the industry. The bill also increased focus on domestic renewable fuel production and introduced new eligibility restrictions, particularly around foreign involvement. For example, only fuel derived from feedstocks grown or produced in North America is eligible for the credit. We are pursuing options to capitalize on 45Z. Based on our current carbon intensity scores, Colombia will qualify for $0.10 per gallon for 2025 and up to $0.20 for 2026, while our Pekin dry mill will qualify for $0.10 per gallon starting in 2026. This equates to roughly $4 million in 2025 and $8 million in 2026 for Colombia and $6 million for the dry mill in 2026 based on production capacity. Further, we expect to make improvements to our plants to increase the anticipated credits moving forward across all eligible facilities. While low carbon corn may contribute favorably towards further reduction in reducing our carbon footprint, we are evaluating whether it's economically beneficial to source that particular feedstock to reduce our carbon footprint. The other 2 operating plants at Pekin will continue to produce higher quality products as well as take advantage of the export market premiums for fuel as the new rule incentivizes domestic ethanol plants from 45Z eligible dry mills. The bill also positively impacts farm programs by boosting sector profitability, reducing financial volatility, enhancing asset values and strengthening the overall safety net with the intent to improve operational stability and long-term farm enterprise value. Also contained within the bill is the increase in USDA commodity reference prices and base acres. Corn will increase by $3.70 per bushel to $4.10 per bushel and soybeans from $8.40 per bushel to $10 per bushel and the addition of up to 30 million base acres that can enroll in the farm programs. As a result, farmers will need new and expanded markets to absorb the additional production. We believe this will bode well for the future of the higher ethanol blends and new uses of American grown feedstocks, making the U.S. an even more attractive origin for sourcing ethanol and other renewable fuel products internationally. Turning to crush margins. The annual uptick in demand from the summer driving season helped lift ethanol prices and improve crush spreads. While it's difficult to predict market fluctuations, we have seen additional spread improvement in Q3. And we remain optimistic for positive margins for the remainder of the summer. Regarding E15 blending waivers, the EPA extended the waivers nationally through the summer, offering continued support for near-term domestic ethanol blending. In California, there was further progress and regulatory momentum continues to build for E15 blending. However, full-scale implementation is still pending further administrative review and regulatory updates. On the sustainability front, we finalized our Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas verifications during the quarter, and we have submitted our 2025 EcoVadis scorecard. On the corporate front, in June, we held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, electing 2 new Board members, Jeremy Besdek and Alan Tank. We look forward to their fresh perspectives and contributions. I'd also like to congratulate Gil Nathan on being named Chairman of the Board and Dianne Nury, Vice Chair. With that, I'll turn the time to Rob for our financial review.

Thank you, Bryon. I'll review the financial results for Q2 2025 compared to Q2 2024. We sold 86.7 million gallons compared to 95.1 million gallons. The change in volume reflects our decision to rationalize unprofitable business in our marketing and distribution segment and the impact of the dock availability at our Pekin campus. Because we sold fewer gallons in Q2 2025 and at average lower prices, net sales were $218 million, $18 million lower than the prior year. Cost of goods sold or COGS was $9 million lower than the same quarter last year. Gross loss was $1.9 million compared to gross profit of $7.6 million, reflecting the following factors. The Pekin campus year-over-year change in unrealized noncash derivatives was negative $13.2 million and the realized derivative gain was positive $7.6 million, resulting in a net unfavorable change of $5.6 million. Although the market crush continued to improve in 2025, we're still on average $0.10 lower than Q2 of 2024. This equated to $5.5 million of lower crush margin comparatively. As Bryon mentioned, we are heading in the right direction with the market crush averaging $0.30 per gallon for July. High-quality alcohol premiums were $0.15 per gallon less than the same quarter last year due to increased competition during the annual contracting process. This translated to $3 million, which we were able to offset with our ability to shift higher volumes into the more profitable ISCC export markets. This is a prime example of how our strategy to diversify production enables us to take advantage of market opportunities. Our essential ingredients return at the Pekin campus dropped this quarter by nearly 4.5 points to 44.2%. However, this doesn't include the impact of our related hedging activities. Taking our realized hedging gains into consideration, there was no impact to profitability. The impact of the dock outage totaled $2.7 million for the quarter, and we are working with our insurance company to recover the losses in excess of our deductibles. At the Western facilities, gross profit improved $5.6 million over Q2 2024. With the addition of our Alto Carbonic liquid CO2 processing facility, the Columbia plant improved gross profit by $3 million to $2.3 million. Finally, in our Magic Valley plant and utilizing it primarily as a terminal, we improved gross profit by another $2.6 million. We also reduced SG&A to $6.2 million. This $2.8 million improvement includes $1.1 million related to final payments for our acquisition of Eagle Alcohol, $900,000 from rightsizing our SG&A staffing levels and another $900,000 less in noncash stock compensation. Along with our workforce reductions that improved COGS by $1.2 million, we are exceeding our target annual overhead savings of approximately $8 million. We also took additional steps to further lower our future costs, including negotiating lower property taxes, improving terms with suppliers, reducing reliance on outside services as well as a myriad of other changes that we expect in aggregate will make a meaningful difference in the future. Interest expense increased $1.1 million, reflecting the higher average outstanding loan balances and interest rates. Our consolidated net loss was $11.3 million for Q2 of 2025 compared to a net loss of $3.4 million in Q2 2024, primarily due to higher unrealized noncash derivative losses, lower crush margins, lower high-quality alcohol premiums and the impact to our loading dock as discussed earlier in the call. Adjusted EBITDA improved $5.7 million to negative $200,000 in Q2 2025. As of June 30, 2025, our derivative net asset position was $1.7 million. Our cash balance was $30 million, and our total loan borrowing availability was $70 million, including $5 million under our operating line of credit and $65 million subject to certain conditions under our term loan facility. During the second quarter of 2025, we used $850,000 in cash from our operations. We spent another $500,000 in CapEx, much lower than historical averages to manage liquidity and focused priorities. And year-to-date, we recorded $16 million in repairs and maintenance expense, in line with our 2025 estimate of $32 million. In summary, our acquisition of Alto Carbonic, entry into the European ISCC markets, cost restructuring efforts and scaling back marginal operations has improved our financial position. With that, I'll turn the call back.

Thank you, Rob. Our purposeful initiatives in 2025 have delivered adjusted EBITDA improvements, even though markets remain volatile. With these successes and a positive overall backdrop, we are doubling down to focus on executable projects within our control with short-term paybacks, more immediate returns, and long-term benefits. We are prioritizing these projects by their anticipated cost, timing, and ROI impact. We are also evaluating opportunities to improve low-carbon prospects, improve asset monetization and increase CO2 utilization and production. The regulatory environment is positive for the industry and is conducive to creating opportunities for Alto. The change in 45Z has created the opportunity for at least 2 plants to apply for credit totaling approximately $18 million in the next 2 years alone based on our nameplate and targeted carbon-intensity scores and for our other plants to capture more of the export market. Notably as a result of the 45Z updates, the earnings profile and thus the intrinsic value of all our facilities have improved. Finally, working with Guggenheim, we continue to make progress on our Western asset optimization and monetization plan. We are also evaluating strategic alternatives and interest for Pekin and the company as a whole. We will share more information in this regard when appropriate. Before we turn the call to questions, I'll note we will present at the H.C. Wainwright Investor Conference on the 9th of September in New York City and hope to see some of you there.

The first question comes from Eric Stine with Craig-Hallum.

This is Luke on for Eric. So first, with the Carbonic acquisition in Colombia already paying off in a big way in terms of profitability, what's your outlook for further operational benefits there? Do you think there's still substantial synergies yet to be realized? And how early are we just in the process of realizing some of these benefits?

It's a good question. We definitely haven't reached our full capacity at the Carbonic facility. We produce over 100,000 tons of CO2 annually at the Columbia facility, with a capacity of about 70,000 tons, while we’re currently selling around 50,000 metric tons. There is clearly room for growth, and we're collaborating with our main customers to ensure we deliver quality products if there is demand. However, building the necessary infrastructure and support takes time. We see this as a positive opportunity for us with minimal effort required. Expanding the Carbonic facility would need additional capital investment, but it mainly involves vessels and similar equipment, making it a relatively light lift as long as demand increases.

Great. That's helpful. And switching gears a little bit for the second question. On the export strategy to Europe, how equipped are you to make this a substantial revenue stream out of Pekin? And does the dock damage recently impede any progress on that front materially? Or is that not really a factor?

So I'll answer that in maybe reverse order. The dock, we have certainly developed workarounds and are working and are grateful for the support that we received from long-standing relationships. That said, it's not as effective as if we were to run it as we have historically with our own dock. So it's imperative that we get our dock repaired and replaced. And we're working diligently to that end, as Rob had mentioned. That said, we have found that as we think back to what we had originally projected and expected around European sales that we are significantly exceeding that and that there continues to be demand for the product. And it's unique in regards to what we can produce because of the high-quality products that we produce at the ICP and the wet mill that make that product unique and eligible for sale there. So we would expect that to continue to improve as well.

The next question comes from Sameer Joshi with H.C. Wainwright.

Yes. I just want a clarification on the SG&A improvement. Was the $1.1 million improvement related to Eagle Alcohol a one-time thing? Or should we expect that going forward as well?

No, that was a one-time. That was just the change in the deferred acquisition costs associated with acquiring Eagle. And those are the final acquisition costs. So you won't see that going forward.

Yes. Yes. That's what I thought. So going forward, it will be $6.1 million plus $1.1 million or around about those levels SG&A on a quarterly basis.

Yes, that's fair.

Okay. Are there any further reductions specifically on the SG&A front that you can realize?

Yes, it's a good question. We took pretty significant efforts to right size our staffing levels to better align with our current organizational footprint. And we've seen the benefit of that. You annualize the impact of that for Q2, we're exceeding our $8 million targeted savings goal, which impacts SG&A and COGS alike. But in regards to SG&A and some other areas, as mentioned in our remarks, we are looking across the board, and we're scrutinizing all spend. We're trying to be very wise with our liquidity. We've negotiated better terms with some of our key suppliers, both in respect to payment terms and in pricing. We've spoken with our property tax assessors and lowered some of our real estate taxes. And we've also taken the opportunity to in-source some activities that historically we used contractors for. So a lot of these efforts individually aren't significant, but collectively, we think that they'll make a pretty meaningful impact moving forward.

Yes. No. It is really good to see improvement on that front. On the 45Z, $18 million estimated benefits over the next 2 years, are those based on CI improvements that you are targeting? Or are those based on existing facility generating those CI scores and $18 million in savings or other benefits?

Yes. No, that's a good question. That number is based on what our current CI scores are anticipated to be under the GREET calculations. It improves for Columbia, it will qualify in 2025. And then with the ILUC standard change being removed, that will double the impact for 2026 is the anticipation at Columbia. The dry mill, we don't anticipate will qualify in 2025. But again, with the ILUC change, we believe they will qualify in 2026. So any additional changes to reduce our carbon score would be above and beyond these targets.

Right, right. And they will come with associated CapEx, which you have indicated you will deploy based on your ROI calculations.

Yes. And some will have CapEx implications, but others may not. It just has to do with ways to continue to be more energy-efficient. And to some degree, it may include sourcing feedstock, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we're still evaluating it, but certainly sourcing feedstock that has a lower carbon footprint. And if you do so effectively, there's significant benefit, as you can see. I mean there's an additional $0.80 to be had between where we will be in 2026. And if you get to 0, that's an incredible lift, but still something to aspire to and achieve.

Yes, yes. And just a clarification on that, it just struck me. You have been using only American-sourced feedstock, right? There was nothing being imported for feedstock.

That's correct.

Got it. Just one last one. Is there any color or insight into the Western asset monetization process or is it being worked on, but no more details?

Yes, I'll take that one. Yes, we're continuing to work with Guggenheim. We're having conversations with prospective buyers, and we're evaluating the opportunities. The process for transactions of this size and for unique assets being destination plants tends to take a little bit longer to get through the diligence process. Each plant is nuanced in its own way. It takes time to discuss in diligence, the high-protein technology at Magic Valley and then also the recent acquisition of the Carbonic CO2 liquid processing facility. Now with the positive regulatory changes that we've seen around 45Z, that's also going to increase our valuations, which is going to impact the diligence process as well. But also point out that we're considering all options as part of our ongoing efforts to maximize shareholder value. And that's including asset sales potentially in addition to Western assets, mergers, or really any strategic transactions that better align the long-term value potential of our company.

And I guess with that, we'll have more to report when appropriate.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Bryon McGregor for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all again for joining us today. We appreciate your ongoing feedback and support. Please have a good day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.