Welcome to Amplify Energy’s Second Quarter 2024 Investor Conference Call. Amplify’s operating and financial results were released yesterday after market close on August 7, 2024, and are available on Amplify’s website at www.amplifyenergy.com. During this conference call all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Today’s call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Jim Frew, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Amplify Energy Corp. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to the Amplify Energy conference call to discuss operating and financial results for the second quarter of 2024. Before we get started, we would like to remind you that some of our remarks may contain forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s current views of future events and are subject to various risks, uncertainties, expectations, and assumptions. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct and undertakes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after this earnings call. Please refer to our press release and SEC filings for a list of factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements made during this call. In addition, the unaudited financial information that will be highlighted here is derived from our internal financial books, records, and reports. For additional detailed disclosure, we encourage you to read our Form 10-Q, which was filed yesterday afternoon. Also, non-GAAP financial measures may be disclosed during this call. Reconciliations of those measures to comparable GAAP measures may be found in our earnings release or on our website. During the call, Martyn Willsher, Amplify’s President and Chief Executive Officer, will review our second-quarter performance and provide an update regarding our previously announced strategic initiatives. Next, Dan Furbee, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, will provide an overview of second-quarter operational performance. Following that, I will discuss second-quarter financial results, provide an update on our balance sheet and liquidity, and provide additional details on our hedge book. Finally, Martyn will conclude our prepared remarks with final thoughts before opening the call up for questions. With that, I will hand it over to Martyn.

Thank you, Jim. Amplify has a strong second quarter of 2024. The company generated $30.7 million of adjusted EBITDA and $9.2 million of free cash flow during the quarter with both exceeding expectations. Due to our stronger-than-expected second-quarter performance, combined with the company’s election to participate in high-return non-operated development wells in East Texas and the Eagle Ford, we have revised our annual guidance. You can find our updated guidance in our earnings release and investor presentation posted to our website last night. With respect to the strategic initiatives highlighted on our previous calls, we received multiple bids for both an outright sale and partial monetization of our barrel assets following a comprehensive marketing process. The company, working with its advisers, continues to actively evaluate the proposals and we’ll provide updates as they become available. The company is committed to pursuing the path that we believe will maximize shareholder value. At Beta, we continue to make progress in our 2024 development program. Dan will provide more details in a moment, but we are pleased to announce that we successfully drilled and brought online the A50 Well in early June with very strong results. The cumulative production received to date from this well continues to exceed the upper end of our expectations, which were based on a limited subset of analogous wells previously drilled at the Beta platforms. With the results of the A50 and comparable results from future development wells, we anticipate increasing our expectations for undeveloped well productivity. In addition, it is important to note that our current SEC proved reserves of Beta only include the four wells we plan to drill in 2024. With continued success, we have a substantial number of additional development locations that we may add to our proved reserve inventory. The combination of increased productivity forecasts and additional locations has the potential to materially impact the value of our Beta reserves and demonstrate the strategic value of this prolific asset. In summary, we continue to focus on optimizing future cash flow generation by pursuing our strategic initiatives at Bairoil and Beta and capitalizing on incremental non-operated investment opportunities in East Texas and the Eagle Ford. We believe this strategy will unlock the full potential of Amplify's diverse portfolio of assets and deliver substantial benefits on long-term value to our shareholders. With that, I’ll hand it over to Dan.

Thank you, Martyn. Total production for the second quarter averaged approximately 20,300 Boe per day. Second-quarter production benefited from a one-time prior period adjustment of approximately 1,200 Boe per day, which was partially offset by production curtailments in East Texas related to significant flooding events. For over 100 days, the high level of the Sabine River impeded access to a significant number of wells in East Texas, forcing shut-ins across the asset base. The team did an excellent job of minimizing the impact of the flooding, and conditions have significantly improved as of this month. Excluding the impact from the prior period adjustment, our production commodity mix for the quarter was 41% oil, 19% NGLs, and 40% natural gas. For the second quarter, lease operating expenses were approximately $36.3 million, a $2 million decrease from the first quarter. Gathering, processing, and transportation costs were $4.9 million, and production taxes were $4.6 million. The decrease in lease operating expenses is partly related to annual maintenance expenses taking place in the first quarter as well as continued cost reduction efforts from the team, which are expected to persist for the remainder of the year. These efforts include previously discussed initiatives with Magnify Energy Services, our wholly-owned subsidiary. Magnify generated approximately $900,000 of adjusted EBITDA in the quarter through compression rentals, vacuum truck services, slip line work, and well testing services. Since inception, Amplify has invested approximately $1.5 million in Magnify, which is projected to generate a run rate adjusted EBITDA of over $3 million per year after only one year of operations. We will continue to explore additional services for Magnify in the coming quarters. The company’s total capital investment for the quarter was $18 million, with approximately $16 million of this capital invested in Beta, where we continue our electrification and emission reduction facility project and our development drilling program. The remaining capital was invested in various capital workovers and facility projects across our asset base. Capital for the second half of 2024 will primarily be allocated to continued development and facility enhancements at Beta and non-operated drilling projects in the Eagle Ford and East Texas. In the Eagle Ford, the company expects to participate in 14 gross (0.7 net) new development wells and 2 gross (0.4 net) recompletion projects. In East Texas, the company expects to participate in 4 gross (on net) wells, with 2 wells targeting the Haynesville formation and the remaining 2 wells targeting the Cotton Valley formation. These projects will provide additional volumes and cash flow in early 2025. The two new development wells in the Haynesville Shale represent a new opportunity for Amplify, as development of the Haynesville has continued to move west and activity has increased in our new acreage position. With the incremental optionality provided by the Haynesville opportunities, we believe that we will be in a strong position to extract additional value from this area in the future. At Beta, we continue the third and final phase of the electrification and emission reduction project involving the installation of selective catalytic reducers for the platform generators and rig engines. We are on schedule to complete this multi-year project in the fourth quarter of this year, which will lower operating expenses by reducing diesel usage and emission credit purchases, increase redundancy across our operations, and bring us in line with regional air quality standards. We are projected to invest $14 million towards this project this year. Once completed, we do not anticipate significant facility capital investments at Beta in the coming years. With the fixed cost improvements from these upgrades and the use of modern technologies in our drilling program, we believe we can recover the massive remaining reserves in the Beta field. During our asset development program, we successfully drilled and completed the A50 Well from the Ellen platform in less than 30 days and brought it online in early June. The well achieved a gross peak IP30 oil rate of approximately 730 barrels of oil per day. Rates from the well after approximately two months of production were in excess of 650 barrels of oil per day. These early production results exceed the high end of the cumulative production range presented in our investor deck. We invested approximately $4.2 million in the well, and at current oil prices, we project a quick payback of approximately four months. The excellent results of this well reinforce the substantial upside that can be achieved through a successful development campaign, utilizing modern technology to drill extended reach laterals to parts of the Beta field that were not accessible in previous drilling programs. In the third quarter, we are drilling the C59 well from the Eureka platform and then intend to drill a second well in Eureka before returning to Ellen, likely late in the fourth quarter, to finish the A45 Well, which was deferred earlier this year. And with that, I will turn it over to Jim.

Thank you, Dan. I would now like to discuss the following items: second quarter financial performance, balance sheet and liquidity, and hedging. With respect to second quarter financial performance, the company reported net income of approximately $7.1 million compared to a $9.4 million net loss in the prior quarter. The change was primarily attributable to lower noncash unrealized losses on commodity derivatives in the quarter. As Martyn previously mentioned, second quarter adjusted EBITDA was $30.7 million, which was well above expectations. In addition to the strong operating performance outlined by Dan, Amplify benefited from a one-time prior period accounting adjustment. In the first half of the year, the company undertook a comprehensive review of its suspense accounts. Based on the results of our research, we determined that a portion of our suspense balance should be released and credited to Amplify. The net impact of these adjustments positively impacted adjusted EBITDA by approximately $7 million in the second quarter. Second quarter lease operating expenses were approximately $36.3 million, which was in line with expectations. LOE was lower than the prior quarter, primarily due to one-time costs that impacted the prior quarter. Amplify expects second-half LOE will be lower than the first half, with full-year LOE remaining within the original guidance range. With respect to other costs, second-quarter GPT costs were $4.9 million or $2.66 per Boe, while production taxes were $4.6 million or 6.4% of oil and gas revenue. Due to low gas prices in 2024, we expect Avalon taxes will be lower for the remainder of the year, and we have updated guidance to reflect that change. Cash G&A in the second quarter was $6.6 million or $3.57 per Boe, which was down $1.3 million from the prior quarter. This decrease was in line with expectations and primarily due to year-end processes that increased costs in the first quarter. The company anticipates that quarterly cash G&A expenses will be relatively flat through the remainder of the year. As a result, we have not adjusted our original G&A guidance range. In the second quarter, we incurred $3.6 million of interest expense, up $0.1 million compared to the prior quarter. With respect to capital, Amplify invested $18 million in the second quarter, which was in line with internal expectations. As Dan mentioned, we have now elected to participate in non-operated development projects totaling $7 million to $9 million in the Eagle Ford and East Texas and have updated our guidance accordingly. We now expect to invest $60 million to $65 million of capital in 2024. Free cash flow, defined as adjusted EBITDA less CapEx and cash interest expense, was $9.2 million for the second quarter of 2024. Amplify has now generated positive free cash flow in 16 of the last 17 quarters, illustrating the strong sustainable cash generating potential of our mature diversified asset base. As of June 30, Amplify had net debt of approximately $117.5 million, consisting of $118 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility and $0.5 million of cash and cash equivalents. At the end of the second quarter, the company’s liquidity was $17.5 million, and net debt to last 12-month adjusted EBITDA was 1.2 times. The slight increase in net debt versus the prior quarter was primarily due to expected changes in working capital and increased investment activity primarily at Beta. The next redetermination of our borrowing base is expected in the fourth quarter of 2024. As of August 7, our forecasted proved developed producing crude oil production was approximately 70% to 75% hedged for the second half of 2024, 55% to 60% hedged for 2025, and 10% to 15% hedged in 2026. On the gas side, our forecasted PDP production is 85% to 90% hedged for the remainder of 2024 and for the full year 2025, with 80% to 85% hedged in 2026. In the second quarter, we added gas hedges covering a portion of our expected 2026 production and crude hedges covering a portion of our 2025 expected production. Amplify executed 2026 natural gas swaps at a weighted average price of $3.88 per MMBtu and natural gas collars with a floor of $3.62 per MMBtu and a ceiling of $4.27 per MMBtu. Amplify also executed crude oil swaps for 2025 at a weighted average price of $74.10 per barrel. We will continue monitoring the market to supplement our strong hedge positions going forward. And with that, I’ll turn the call back to Martyn.

Thank you, Jim. As I mentioned earlier on this call, we are updating guidance based on our strong first half results and the company’s election to participate in non-operated development wells in East Texas and the Eagle Ford. Amplify’s updated guidance is based on full year 2024 commodity prices for WTI crude of $76 a barrel and Henry Hub Natural Gas of $2.25 per MMBtu. As previously disclosed, the company expects to invest 85% to 95% of its capital in the first three quarters primarily in connection with the Beta projects. Additional guidance details are provided in our earnings release and can be found in the latest investor presentation currently available on our website. In summary, the first half of 2024 has exceeded expectations, and we are excited about the initial results of our development program at Beta. The successful development program of Beta is key to demonstrating the strategic potential of the asset. The potential to materially increase cash flow and long-term value for the company is significant, and we remain confident that the combination of our exciting Beta and non-operated development opportunities, coupled with our strong balance sheet and relentless focus on cost structure, have the potential to be transformative for the company, providing a catalyst for market outperformance, while also enhancing our flexibility as we consider and evaluate potential capital return options in future periods. With that, operator, we are now open for questions.

Thank you. We will take our first question from Jeff Grampp with Alliance Global Partners.

Good morning, guys, and congrats on getting the Beta news out. I wanted to unsurprisingly start there. So I think when you guys originally announced this development program, it included the four wells for this year, as you guys have talked about. And then I think the plan was three wells in 2025 given the results so far. I know we still have a few more wells to continue to de-risk this, but what are the constraints to doing more than those three wells in 2025? Or how do you guys just generally think about a potential acceleration case there?

Yes, I think that’s something that we’re going to take a closer look at through the second half of this year, especially as we continue to get additional results. Obviously, we can drill and complete these in approximately 30 days. So we do mix in workovers using the same rigs during the course of the year. And we obviously always want to keep our eye on total capital, but we do have the flexibility to adjust that a little bit as we go forward. That’s something that we’ll look at, like I said, as we continue to get additional results here in the third and fourth quarter.

Okay. Understood. And then on the well cost front, I think you guys were originally targeting kind of $5 million to $6 million. This one came in, in kind of the low 4s. What’s your assessment of the repeatability of that? I mean, if anything, I would think the earlier wells would be on the more expensive side as you guys kind of ramp up efficiencies and learnings and things of that nature. What’s your kind of confidence level to continue to come in under that initial 5% to 6% range?

Hey Jeff, this is Dan. The $5 million to $6 million estimate was made before we started drilling wells out here. The team did a great job on A50. We were very efficient, the well was done on time, and we’ll see as we go. We won’t get a few more wells under our belt before we lower our overall expectation, but it’s certainly possible to drill these wells for less than $5 million.

Okay. Great. And then if I could sneak one more in. The new non-op wells that you guys elected to participate in that popped up in East Texas. Obviously, gas prices are not tremendously high right now, but I assume they kind of met your hurdle rate. Just wondering what your assessment is. Is this kind of setting up a potential longer-term capital allocation potential in East Texas? Or is this just a couple maybe one-offs where you guys just kind of wanted to participate and kind of get a look for what these well economics could be down the road?

So I think it’s a combination of both, but I’ll say that the Haynesville has been obviously prospective in our area, and the activity keeps getting closer and closer now is obviously on our acreage. We have a meaningful amount of Haynesville acreage that is now prospective. We want to learn firsthand, especially as we look to decide what to do with – we have some contiguous acres where you could have an entirely different drilling program and whether we want to partner up or do something different with some of those acres. This is an opportunity to learn more while participating in a kind of a lower risk 25% working interest level. We do have some interesting opportunities now in Haynesville. Of course, we have low gas prices, which are forecasted to be better next year. Even with where they’re currently projected, we feel comfortable with the returns. We want to understand what our options will be in this area, which could increase in importance to us for 2025 and beyond.

Okay. Sounds good. Thank you guys for the time.

Thank you, Jeff.

Thank you, Jeff.

Thank you. And our next question comes from John White with Roth Capital.

Good morning and congratulations on a strong quarter and getting your bids in on the Bairoil property. You mentioned several times maximizing shareholder value. Assuming a close – excuse me, assuming a closing and a robust amount of sale proceeds from Bairoil, do you have a preference at this time for capital returns? Would it be instituting a stock buyback or initiating a stock dividend program?

Yes. Let me address both parts. Obviously, when you’re in an active discussion, we have to be very careful about what information we disclose. While we’d love to say more, we have the option to sell it outright, partially monetize it, or just hold it if we think that’s best for the company longer term. That’s a currently active process, so we can only provide updates once they’re more definitive. In terms of capital returns, I always say that this will depend on what we see at the time. In the past, we’ve done both dividends and stock buybacks. Both of those are certainly on the table. It could be one or the other, or a combination of both. We could accelerate it by monetizing in some way the barrel, or we could do it through cash flow generation, which will pick up considerably in Q4 and beyond. We’ll evaluate both options at the appropriate time. At this point, it would be inappropriate for me to speculate on what the Board will decide.

I understand your constraints in your communication, and thanks for addressing it. I’ll turn the call back.

Thank you, John.

Thank you. And we will take our next question from Subash Chandra with Benchmark.

Yes, thanks. Congrats on finally showing the value of Beta. Were the cycle times pretty much what you expected on the A50, or were they faster?

It’s about what was expected. Drill and complete time, we expect less than a month. Every well out here is a little different. Some will take a little longer than this one did, and some will take a little shorter. But every well we currently look at in our inventory should be less than a month if the drilling pace is as we expect.

Got it. Okay. So I think back to maybe a question that Jeff had asked. With the Haynesville play, do you want to take a look? And maybe this is a cost-effective way of taking a look at what the value of the acreage is? Or it could have been arguably two more California wells? How does that sort of value proposition walk through?

I don’t think our ultimate constraint on California will be capital. With the quick payback of these wells, we can ramp up if it makes sense to do so. We’ll obviously be cognizant of capital allocation. But with the free cash flow we’re generating, especially starting in the fourth quarter, I think we’ll have the optionality there to both participate in Haynesville if that makes sense, and also if we decide to go a little faster and increase activity in California, we can do that as well. One does not preclude the other. You have to take advantage of opportunities as they can come up.

Great. Yes. No, that makes sense. I guess the acceleration, let’s say, a significant acceleration, would that be because you have a lot of free cash flow coming for sure, but then you have these monetization events that are potential? Do we need both to see a material acceleration in California? Understanding you’re walking through the results of the wells, let’s say they all come out looking like A50. Do you need both to occur, or do you think you can materially curate just through organic free cash flows?

I think we can clearly generate sufficient organic free cash flow even if you doubled activity levels in 2025, just as an example. The infrastructure project at Beta is due for a lot of that free cash flow. We’ll continue through the third quarter, which is why we’ve talked about how the fourth quarter is where we’ll start to generate more of a go-forward free cash flow outlook. This will also be impactful from a full fixed cost perspective on that platform. So it will also increase the cash flow from Beta’s assets, not just from the development side but also by reducing costs going forward. It’s much more meaningful in the fourth quarter and beyond. I don’t think it will impede us if we don’t monetize; that won't be a constraint to a faster program.

Got it. Yes. So it’s that operating leverage that we should begin to see in the fourth quarter with the four wells?

Yes, I guess that wasn’t a question.

All right, thanks, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. And we will take our next question from Jeff Robertson with Water Tower Research.

Thank you. Martyn, following up on where you ended that. Can you talk at all or can you provide some color on where you think LOE and Beta will go with the electrification and the additional volumes?

Yes. Hi, this is Dan. LOE and Beta... As we finish this project, it’s doing several things: its redundancy will lower LOE, and it’s required by the air quality standards by the South Coast Air Quality District in Southern California. What this will do for us is reduce essentially all of our diesel usage in California from an operating standpoint, and it should reduce overall power costs. A big part of our LOE right now is, in addition to diesel, at Beta we have to buy NOx credits, mission credits to offset our NOx emissions. After this project, NOx emissions will be almost nonexistent. We expect next year to see a sizable reduction in total Beta LOE once this project is fully completed.

I think, Dan, in the second quarter, LOE and Beta was just short of $43 per Boe. Do you know where that could go? I think you were at $34 a Boe in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Yes. Quarter-by-quarter, it’s going to jump around some, as part of our LOE is also workover expenses. So in addition to drilling wells, we have to pull ESPs at different times when they fail throughout the year. Depending on whether we’re doing expense workovers or drilling wells within a certain quarter, that will move that LOE number up and down. But we’ll have more information as we get further in the year as to what our LOE is going to look like here for next year. What we expect should be trending down.

Jeff, the other thing I would add is as we ramp up production, you’re talking per Boe, right? As we ramp volumes with the drilling program, our costs are generally fixed. So our per Boe costs are going to come down as we increase our volumes. We’ll have more on this coming forward, but I think that the story is generally a positive one.

Right. Costs come down and margins go up.

That’s right.

Jim, on the RBL redetermination in the fall. I think before Al went offline, the borrowing base was $225 million to $240 million. With the Bairoil sale and having Beta on in the development, can you give any color on where you think an RBL might be after the redetermination and what that will do just for the liquidity on paper?

Like Martyn said, it’s a little early to speculate on the barrel monetization and what that may do. That makes it a little difficult to answer your question. That being said, we are generating free cash flow. There’s not a huge need for us to increase the size of the facility today. But again, as we add reserves and value, we will have the option to do that if our lenders are supportive. From our perspective, it’s not a major concern right now. Again, similar to what I just said, there’s more upside than not as we continue to do things at Beta.

Yes. I’ll just add that the Bairoil facility does not meaningfully impact the credit facility. Our borrowing base is higher than our committed capital. Selling it wouldn’t have a huge impact on the availability of the credit facility. Whatever you sold before, monetizing it would obviously be incremental liquidity. Given the nature of and status of our discussions, we’re not alluding to whether or not we’re going to transact on it or not at this point. We just want to ensure we’re open to all opportunities.

Thanks, Martyn.

Thank you. It appears that we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back to our presenters for closing remarks.

Thank you. With that, I’d just like to say thank you to all of our employees for their outstanding efforts and dedication this year. I’d also like to express my appreciation to all of our stakeholders for their continuing support. We appreciate you all participating in our call today. And as always, if you have any other follow-up questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out directly to us. Thank you, everyone.

Thank you. This does conclude today’s Amplify Energy’s Second Quarter 2024 Investor Conference Call. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.