Good morning, and welcome to Columbus McKinnon's Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Ludy, and I will be your conference operator today. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Kristy Moser, Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasurer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and welcome, everyone, to our call. On today's call, we will be covering our second quarter fiscal 2026 financial and operational results. On the call with me today are David Wilson, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Greg Rustowicz, our Chief Financial Officer. In a moment, Greg and David will walk you through our financial and operating performance for the quarter. The earnings release and presentation to supplement today's call are available for download on our Investor Relations website at investors.cmco.com. Before we begin our remarks, please let me remind you that we have our safe harbor statement on Slide 2. During the course of this call, management may make forward-looking statements in regards to our current plans, beliefs, and expectations. These statements are not guarantees for future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other factors that can cause actual results and events to differ materially from the results and events contemplated by these forward-looking statements. I'd also like to remind you that management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. You can find the reconciliations of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures on the company's Investor Relations website and in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please see our earnings release and our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for more information. Today's prepared remarks will be followed by a question-and-answer session. We respectfully ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. With that, I'll turn the call over to David.

Thank you, Kristy, and good morning, everyone. Our team delivered results in the second quarter that were ahead of expectations as we capitalized on record backlog and saw stabilization in U.S. short-cycle order activity. We also made meaningful progress on our operational improvement, tariff mitigation, and integration preparedness initiatives. I would like to thank our entire Columbus McKinnon team for their dedication and continued focus on performance and execution. Net sales increased 8% year-over-year to $261 million with growth across all product platforms as short-cycle demand stabilized, and we accelerated deliveries from Q3 to meet evolving customer delivery requirements. Sales were up broadly, and we delivered volume growth in both the U.S. and EMEA, our two largest regions. Adjusted EPS improved $0.12 sequentially to $0.62 in the second quarter, reflecting higher sales, margin expansion, and continued cost management. Margins improved sequentially, driven by improved absorption on higher volumes and the early translation of tariff mitigation actions. As expected, year-over-year adjusted margins were down due to tariffs and sales mix impacts in addition to an incentive compensation accrual release in the prior year. Last quarter, we estimated the net tariff impact in Q1 was approximately $4.2 million. As price increases begin to replace tariff surcharges, it is becoming more difficult to calculate net tariff-specific impacts. Nonetheless, we estimate that our Q2 net tariff impact moderated slightly from Q1 levels. Despite the constantly evolving tariff landscape, we continue to expect tariffs to be a net $10 million headwind to operating profit in the fiscal year. Given the latest developments, however, we now expect this impact to spill over into this quarter, and we are now targeting the achievement of tariff cost neutrality by the end of fiscal '26. We still expect to achieve margin neutrality in fiscal '27. Orders were $254 million, down 3% year-over-year, as the prior year benefited from three significant project orders totaling over $20 million within our precision conveyance and rail businesses. While our pipeline of quotation activity remains healthy, the weaker economic landscape in EMEA and APAC is resulting in slower conversion for project orders. In the U.S., we saw order growth of 11% with strong performance in both project-related and short-cycle categories, reflecting a strengthening demand environment, the stabilization of U.S. short-cycle volumes, and the implementation of price increases to offset tariffs. Over time, we expect lower interest rates and megatrends, including reshoring, automation, and scarcity of labor to drive incremental demand. We are capitalizing on our leadership positions in end markets with notable tailwinds such as aerospace, energy, rail, transportation, metals, heavy equipment, and defense. We also remain focused on the vertical end markets benefiting from secular growth trends, where we have been building a leadership position such as battery production, e-commerce, life sciences, and food and beverage. Our backlog is a healthy $352 million, up $34 million or 11% versus the prior year, with increases in all platforms as we've continued to execute on our commercial initiatives. Strong execution to meet evolving customer delivery requirements resulted in the accelerated conversion of Q3 backlog into Q2 shipments. As a result, the current quarter backlog came down 4% year-over-year, which is expected to impact Q3 sales volume. While we remain laser-focused on the performance of our core business, we continue to advance integration preparedness for the pending acquisition of Kito Crosby. We have established an Integration Management Office, or IMO, that is executive-led and reports into me as well as a Board subcommittee that will provide governance and oversight related to integration initiatives and our performance versus plan. The IMO will be comprised of dedicated executive and cross-functional leaders from both companies to ensure the realization of our combined company integration and synergy objectives. This will enable core business leaders and teams to focus on ongoing business activity, operational performance, and improving customer experience. We remain enthusiastic about the strategic combination of our companies, which will scale the business, enable synergies, expand customer capabilities, and accelerate our Intelligent Motion strategy over time. Following integration, we'll be over $2 billion in sales, delivering top-tier industrial margins and strong cash flow performance that enables reinvestment in our business after deleveraging. Our team continues to prepare for the closing of the acquisition as quickly as the regulatory process will allow, and we now expect the transaction to close by the end of our current fiscal year.

Thank you, David, and good morning, everyone. As David shared, Columbus McKinnon delivered strong results in the second quarter even as we navigated ever-changing tariff policies in a volatile macroeconomic environment. We delivered the second highest quarter for sales in our history of $261 million, up 8% from the prior year, driven by higher volume, pricing, and a favorable currency translation. We drove sales growth across all platforms, led by our lifting and linear motion platforms. We saw pricing accelerate in the quarter and expect previously announced price increases to ramp over the next few quarters as we continue to work through our backlog. Short-cycle sales increased 7% as we benefited from higher U.S. short-cycle orders as the market stabilized after the uncertainty caused by tariffs. Project-related sales increased 8% as we converted backlog to revenue on some larger projects in our U.S. precision conveyance and rail businesses. Gross profit of $90.2 million increased by $15.4 million or 21% versus the prior year on a GAAP basis, driven by the benefit of higher sales as well as a significant year-over-year reduction of $11.1 million in factory consolidation and new factory start-up costs. On a GAAP basis, our gross margin was 34.5%. And on an adjusted basis, our gross margin was 35.3%. Adjusted gross margin contracted 100 basis points year-over-year due to the previously discussed impact of tariffs. While our SG&A expenses increased $13.9 million to $70.3 million on a GAAP basis, this included $9.9 million in acquisition-related costs incurred for the pending Kito Crosby transaction and $1.1 million in business realignment costs. Excluding these items, adjusted RSG&A was up by $5.8 million to $59.2 million on higher sales volume and incentive compensation accrual release in the prior year as well as the impact of foreign currency translation, which was $1.1 million of the increase. As a percentage of sales, adjusted RSG&A increased 60 basis points to 22.7%. However, normalizing for the change in incentive compensation costs, adjusted RSG&A would have improved as a percentage of sales. As a result, we generated operating income of $12.2 million in the quarter on a GAAP basis and adjusted operating income of $25.2 million. Adjusted operating margin was 9.7% in the quarter. This resulted in adjusted EBITDA of $37.4 million in Q2 with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 14.3%. GAAP income per diluted share for the quarter was $0.16, and adjusted earnings per share was $0.62. Adjusted earnings per share decreased $0.08 versus the prior year, driven by the impact of tariffs. Free cash flow in the quarter was $15.1 million, reflecting growth in earnings and working capital improvement even as we paid $2.5 million of acquisition-related deal costs. Finally, we are updating our full year guidance for fiscal 2026. We are increasing our expectations for net sales and now expect growth of low to mid-single digits for the year, up from the previous guidance of flat to slightly up year-over-year. We are also reaffirming our adjusted EPS guidance of flat to slightly up year-over-year. As a reminder, our fiscal third quarter is our seasonal low for both sales and margins given fewer workdays due to the holiday season. Our guidance assumes approximately $10 million of tariff-related cost impacts to the business in fiscal 2026. Fiscal Q3 will see residual cost impacts due to the timing of tariff recovery initiatives and recent changes increasing Section 232 tariffs. We expect to be profit dollar neutral on tariffs by the end of fiscal '26 as we implement our mitigation strategies. As a reminder, our guidance does not include the impact of the pending Kito Crosby acquisition. We remain enthusiastic about the pending acquisition and our ability to achieve our stated long-term objectives, including synergy realization and de-levering. While we continue to navigate a volatile macroeconomic environment, we remain focused on our controllables, including operational execution, cost control, and driving our commercial initiatives.

Our first question comes from Matt Summerville with D.A. Davidson.

A couple of questions. You obviously ported the sales goodness you saw in the quarter through the guide for the remainder of the year, but you didn't do the same for earnings. Can you talk about kind of the pluses and minuses that didn't allow that sales goodness to kind of flow through? And maybe the answer is the magnitude of pull forward, it sounds like you may have had into the quarter. And if that would be the case, can you help us kind of understand and quantify that? And then I have a follow-up.

Sure. Yes, Matt. And you kind of hit the nail on the head. We had revenues that were pulled forward from Q3 into Q2. And as you know, Q3 tends to be a seasonally low quarter and then Q4 a seasonally high quarter. And so typically, first half, second half tends to approximate one another in terms of top line, but we do have the tariff total of $10 million that we talked about as a net impact to the year still being the amount that we anticipate for the year and a portion of that, probably a few million dollars translating into Q3. And so the combination of the pull forward, the tariff impact in Q3, and the roughly 20% increase in second half versus first half EPS kind of is why we didn't raise the EPS guide on the slightly higher revenue. And so while we anticipate that we continue to make progress throughout the year, and certainly, we're laser-focused on doing so, realizing those improvements and then making that progress, we thought it was prudent to de-risk the second half of the year with the beat in the first half and focus on executing to deliver on the full year guide.

Matt, this is Greg. There's also another factor to it as well, and that's foreign currency translation. So we're certainly benefiting on the top line from a foreign currency translation, and it was roughly $8 million year-to-date, and it will be probably a similar number in the second half of the year. And the margin on a foreign currency change is essentially your operating margin times the change in sales. So it's going to have less of an impact on the overall bottom line.

Got it. So there's definitely some moving parts there. So I want to understand 34.3% was a gross margin in Q1. 35.3%, I believe, is what it was in Q2 on an adjusted basis, realizing seasonal factors, realizing timing of how pricing is rolling through and tariff mitigation, there's a lot of moving parts in the back half of the year. Is there a way that you guys can help us kind of triangulate on what the margin sort of cadence looks like from here through year-end?

Yes, I'm happy to discuss this further offline and clarify any questions. However, I want to point out that in the second half of the year, when looking at margin performance alongside our full year guidance, the year-over-year gross margin impact is estimated to be affected by a $10 million tariff impact. This equates to approximately 100 basis points of margin erosion year-over-year when comparing this year to the last. There is also a mix impact because we are increasing production at our linear motion factory in Mexico, which adds higher-margin products to the mix. As we increase our montratec volumes, along with automation, these are also contributing higher margins. However, we are also dealing with a backlog of lower-margin crane-related solutions. The combination of these factors leads to a mix impact and the headwind from the annual tariff impact that influences our gross margin outlook for the business.

And Matt, I'd like to also point out, as you know, that our fiscal third quarter is typically our seasonally slowest. There's less workdays. We have the holidays impact that around the world. And we typically see margins flat to slightly down in the third quarter because of that as there's less absorption in our factories.

And your next question comes from the line of Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities.

This is Willem on for Jon. Can you talk to the sustainability of the improved short order activity in the U.S.?

Sure. We were pleased to see that activity come back as we were forecasting. We knew that we had some disruption in our fourth and first quarters, as I think our channel partners leaned on their inventory and the kind of unsettled trade relation scenarios played out. But we did see the rebound happen in this quarter. It was robust, and we were pleased with that. And we do anticipate that, that will continue as we advance through the third and fourth quarters. We don't see any reason at this point that, that would go in a wrong direction. We do have some seasonal impacts in that in the fourth quarter with a lot of customers having year-ends that are measured in December. They may manage inventory in a way that manages that down towards the end of the year. But if you look at the second half, first half scenarios, I think that we'd see reasonable and continued level of demand for short cycle through the balance of the year.

And can you add some color around the project backlog and pipeline and conversion rate trends, both in the legacy business and the precision business?

Yes. I mean really encouraged by the funnel of opportunities that we have. We have record-level funnels in most categories of products. We're in very active and engaged conversations with multiple customers about pretty interesting and significant opportunities. Those decisions around letting or making decisions around awarding those contracts have taken a little bit longer than we would have anticipated entering our second quarter. And so the timing of those projects being awarded is something that plays out over time. But we're encouraged by the project backlog that we have. As you could see in the $352 million or $351 million worth of backlog that we have at the end of the quarter. But we are even more encouraged by what we see in the funnel and how those projects are playing out right now. We are seeing conversion rates notably in Europe, given some of the deteriorating macro forecasts there taking a little bit longer to close if you look at it geographically than those in the Americas. But still, we remain encouraged about what lies ahead.

And your next question comes from the line of Steve Ferazani with Sidoti.

I did want to ask about the timing of the Kito Crosby closing. It sounds like you now think it's going to be three months later. You've pushed it off before. I think all you had was HSR to clear. Any reason to be concerned here? Any thoughts on the delay?

Right. Yes. No reason to be concerned. We've substantially complied with the DOJ's second request, and we're working towards closing. We're trying to do so as expeditiously as possible, and we've made progress from a financing, integration planning, and regulatory standpoint. As you know, we've secured fully committed financing and completed the syndication of the bridge facility, including the $500 million revolver, and we'll pursue permanent financing as we advance toward closing. And we're taking full advantage of the time that we have between now and close to make sure that we're preparing for day one readiness. And so we've established a full-time dedicated integration management office. We've established a governance structure with our Board around oversight. And we're working with a group of external resources to make sure that we're wrapping the expertise around this that is necessary to allow for us to accelerate delivery of synergies and de-lever rapidly post close, but also to make sure that we have good business continuity and we don't disrupt the core business and enable the resources that are focusing there to remain as focused there as can be possible during this transition. So nothing to be worried about there, just working through the process and anticipate closing by the end of our fiscal year.

I'm going to combine a couple of my follow-up questions, as they are related. The strong cash flow this quarter is noteworthy. Typically, the second half of the year shows much greater strength than the first half regarding working capital reversal. I would like to know how you view capital expenditures and cash flow for this year in light of your earnings guidance. Additionally, since the deal closing has been pushed out by a quarter and given the strong cash flow, are you adjusting your expectations regarding leverage after the deal closes?

Let me begin by discussing our expectations for capital expenditures, which will be detailed in the 10-Q that we will file this evening. Based on our current situation, we anticipate approximately $15 million to $20 million in capital expenditures for the entire year. We are very pleased with the progress we have made in terms of cash flow. From a financing standpoint, we are dealing with significant amounts. While we expect to generate substantial free cash flow in the latter half of the year, we remain confident in our previous guidance that our leverage will be around the high-4s when we complete the deal, though there may be some minor fluctuations.

And your next question comes from the line of James Kirby with JPMorgan.

Most of my guidance questions have already been asked. But just following up on some of the questions on the U.S. Obviously, a really strong quarter with orders and sales up double digits. You mentioned some industries in the prepared remarks, David, aerospace, energy, but just wanted to dig deeper there. Are there any subsectors you're seeing particular strength or weakness in the U.S.? And how are we looking into September and October here?

Yes, James, we're seeing robust demand across most end markets as we look at the U.S. Certainly, heavy equipment, steel playing a significant role in driving demand. Aerospace is strong. The Department of Defense is strong. And even automotive is picking up, I think, as there's a little bit of rebalancing in terms of ICE engine versus e-vehicle as well as tariff-impacted production plans. And so we provide solutions into that space that are picking up as well. So feeling good about the level of demand that we're seeing here and anticipate that as we go forward, the tailwinds around labor scarcity, the need for improved production or productivity, automation as well as some of the trade-related impacts will play a benefit, play a role in helping drive demand in the U.S.

Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe for our second question, maybe a high-level one on what you're seeing in lifting in North America and especially as it relates to the competitive environment. Just broadly speaking, I assume peers are doing the same things you guys are doing with price surcharges. So maybe you could just speak high level on the dynamic in the U.S. in the lifting space.

Yes. Certainly, we are obviously focused on executing our strategy, and we have been disciplined about improving customer experience, improving our operational performance to meet customer expectations. We continue to make progress there, and we'll continue to do so through the balance of our year and as we head into combining with Kito Crosby. The competitive landscape is one where our competitors are disciplined, and they tend to follow a similar path to the path that we're following. We try to be leaders in the space. But obviously, we compete against good companies. And they're taking similar actions, as you had indicated, relative to tariff mitigation plans, relative to making sure that we're looking at our supply chains. We're looking at tariff codes. We're looking at the opportunities to rebalance production where we can. And I think that we're in a position where we're clearly focused on doing what we can to execute well, earn more of our customers' business, and grow our share in the space. And we continue to remain focused on that as we head into the balance of the year.

Thank you. And that concludes the question-and-answer session of today's call. I will now turn it over to David for final remarks.

Great. Thank you, Ludy, and thank you to all for joining us today. In summary, we delivered a solid Q2 with 8% sales growth as we execute on record backlog. Our tariff mitigation actions are beginning to take effect, and we are confident in our ability to offset impacts over time. Our performance gives us the confidence to increase our full year revenue outlook and reiterate guidance for adjusted EPS. Our demand pipeline remains healthy, and we are focused on executing our commercial and operational initiatives to deliver results for our customers. That focus, combined with effective cost management and strong cash flow generation, positions us to deliver shareholder value over time. We also continue to make progress towards the closing of the Kito Crosby acquisition and remain enthusiastic about the value this strategic combination will unlock for all stakeholders as we more than double revenue, deliver top-tier industrial margins, and generate strong cash flow, enabling rapid de-levering. Thanks for investing your time with us today. As always, please reach out to Kristy with any questions. Thank you.

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.