Good day and welcome to Conduent's Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Results Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask a question. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Alan Katz, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to Conduent's third quarter 2020 earnings call. Joining me on today's call is Cliff Skelton, Conduent's CEO, and Brian Walsh, Conduent's CFO. Following our prepared remarks, we will take your questions. This call is also being webcast. A copy of the slides used during this call was filed with the SEC this afternoon. Those slides as well as a detailed financial metrics sheet are available for download on the Investor Relations section of the Conduent website. We will also post a transcript later this week. During this call, Conduent executives may make comments that contain certain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that, by their nature, address matters that are in the future and are uncertain. These statements reflect management's current beliefs, assumptions, and expectations as of today, November 5, 2020, and are subject to a number of factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those statements. Information concerning these factors is included in Conduent's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required by law. The information presented today includes non-GAAP financial measures. Because these measures are not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, they should be viewed in addition to and not as a substitute for the company's reported financial results prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For more information regarding definitions of our non-GAAP measures and how we use them as well as limitations as to their usefulness for comparative purposes, please see our press release, which was issued this afternoon and was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K. With that, I will now turn the call over to Cliff for his prepared remarks.

Thanks, Alan. Good afternoon, everyone. And welcome to Conduent's Q3 earnings call. I really appreciate everybody joining today. I've been the CEO here since August of 2019. And I don't think I need to remind anyone of the amount of change we've all experienced. And of course, Conduent is no exception to that change. Given that, I'd be remiss if I didn't again say thank you to our over 60,000 dedicated associates, most of whom continue to work from home and take care of our clients. In a services business, nothing works without a dedicated team, so I'm very grateful to our team. Regarding the quarter, it was a strong one. We have numbers to report today that exceeded both our internal and our external expectations, again, due to the hard work by our associates. As I've said previously, the secret sauce at this point in our company's evolution is really in the foundation centering on the fundamentals. We saw some solid fundamental performance. And we'll take you through some of that in just a moment. Now, Slide 4 just gives you a bit of narrative feedback from our clients and our associates. So let me quickly go over the agenda before we dive into the details. First, I'll go through the high-level financials for the quarter. And as always, we'll discuss our sales results. In both cases, we were fortunate to have exceeded our previous internal and external expectations. I'll also go through some of the improvements we're seeing from our operations and our delivery teams, as well as give you a flyby of the organization and process model changes we've made here in 2020. I'll then turn it over to Brian to run through some of the more detailed financials and our outlook for the remainder of the year and, of course, questions at the end, as always. But let's turn to Slide 5 and we'll get started. The third quarter was definitely strong. Revenue and adjusted EBITDA both came in higher than expected with revenue of over $1 billion at $1.041 billion and EBITDA at $141 million. Brian will go deeper, but let's go over a couple of the highlights. Our government business performed well in Q3, primarily driven by COVID-19 upside in the payments business and increased subsidy enrollment in eligibility activities. Our transportation businesses continued to see a more muted impact from COVID-19 than we previously anticipated. In fact, in some states, volumes, believe it or not, were pretty close to pre-COVID volumes. In our commercial activities, COVID continues to create some downward pressure as anticipated, especially in our claims processing offerings and associated mailroom scanning activities. Regarding EBITDA, we saw even stronger performance with improved margins, primarily due to some overachievement in our cost and efficiency efforts and our measures of revenue. We now see ourselves exceeding $140 million in savings, which was at the top end of the range we described to you on the last call. Also, and importantly, the government payments revenue, which ramped up with government subsidy efforts, is coming in at a higher margin due to relatively low incremental expense. Now, both of these tailwinds resulted in expanded margins and improved EBITDA. We think that some of this margin expansion may be temporary or at least tied to the duration of the increased subsidy volumes in our government business. With respect to sales, we felt like Q3 was also strong, certainly on a year-over-year basis, as we sold twice as much new business in Q3 2020 as we did in the same quarter last year. I'll go through more details on the next slide. We believe we will meet or beat our full-year quota for 2020, which, as you may remember, is 160% of last year's actual new business sales TCV. Also, our IT journey is ongoing and remains important. We continue to see progress from our client's point of view, and our metrics show that 2020 is much improved. My sense is that the incremental improvement will always be needed as the environment is and always will be constantly changing. But to date, we feel really good about our progress. Now, while 75% of our associates are still working from home, we've been able to meet the vast majority of client expectations despite the remote working conditions. While we do have a return to work plan, it will remain quite flexible based on geography, pandemic conditions, et cetera. So in terms of our office footprint, we don't ever really see ourselves getting exactly back to pre-COVID models. But at the same time, we likely won't stay where we are either. So the good news is that given all that our employee base seems to remain motivated and optimistic, as evidenced by our most recent survey. Associate satisfaction will always remain critical for future success, and we're going to stay focused on that as we are today. So let's turn to Slide 6, and we'll discuss in a more detailed way our strong sales quarter. We had $468 million in new business signings, double last year's signings, as I previously mentioned. Annual recurring revenue signings were also up 35% year-over-year. Overall, year-to-date, our new business signings are around 180% of what we signed in the exact same first three quarters of last year. So let me give you a few examples of the types of deals we signed in Q3. In our commercial business, we signed a learning contract with a very large global aircraft and defense manufacturer. We will be running end-to-end management of learning providers. In our government business, we signed a deal with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment to provide Medicaid and children's healthcare eligibility processing and some support to some long-term care programs. And finally, we expanded our services with the city of Memphis in our transportation space, beyond the curbside management and public safety solutions we already have in place, and we're keen to continue to expand these important relationships, so we can continue to drive add-on revenue wherever we can. As we've discussed in the past, growth is always simple to describe and difficult to achieve. It not only requires sales, but it's heavily dependent upon retention, and overcoming the lost contracts of the past that have a run-off tail. We clearly think there are leading indicators for growth. Certainly, one is client retention, where we see renewals up compared to 2019. Now, volume shifts are also always important because in some of our contracts, volume swings can come back and forth depending on performance. In our case, discretionary volume this year is holding its own. Finally, as mentioned, new sales and add-on TCV in annual recurring revenue are on track this year. All three metrics are leading bellwether indications for the future. But while we can't yet predict when the overall shift to growth will take place, primarily due to the continued uncertainty of COVID, all of the components were in place and had moved in a positive direction. The rest of the story is really about time and consistency. So attach whatever analogy or metaphor or story that suits you, but to use my own, it's clear to me that our ship is turning. Let's not turn to Slide 7 for an update on how we continue to drive change throughout the company. As always, our strategy remains focused on growth, efficiency, and quality. We use these pillars as guideposts for our continuous improvement plan and we've already started making progress on several fronts. So a couple of key points here. We're standardizing the processes and the governance around client implementations and contract ramp. We're strictly governing account management now and incident responses. We'll measure specific commitments from and to clients post-sale to ensure revenue ramp is more predictable. We've also added several new leaders to the senior leadership team in operations, customer experience management, government services, payments, and in healthcare. And we've added new leaders in technology, finance, and human resources. Now, these are proven leaders in the marketplace who have come to Conduent because they believe in the dream; they believe in the promise of the future, and they're already adding value. But our talent focus goes beyond the senior leadership team. We're also driving change to the corporate culture. We're encouraging teamwork, openness, and improved communication, all of which seems to be driving improvement to associate engagement. And speaking of our associate engagement, we had a significant improvement in participation. We showed marked improvement in nearly every category. So things are different, and they continue to improve. And I believe our clients are feeling it as well. We're also focused on efficiency as you would expect. We're leveraging a new shared service model to drive process improvement and cost containment. We're heavily focused on improved associate recruitment and development where costs can be really high, and we're seeing improvements in associate retention. As mentioned, from a cost perspective, in 2020, we now expect to overachieve the high end of the $120 million to $140 million range we gave in the prior earnings call. And we're expecting the bulk of the savings to be permanent and bleed into 2021, as you would expect. Regarding technology, our data center modernization efforts continue to go well, and our newly opened IT command center is adding value, especially in terms of improved performance levels. But the bottom line, before I turn it over to Brian, is we have more work to do across these three pillars of growth, efficiency, and quality. While it was a great quarter, I'll say again, the more important aspect than one or two or even three quarters is consistency. Our mission here is to do what we say we're going to do at a minimum. And over time, Conduent will become a growth company. We see that path to stabilizing revenue, then showing growth. And I'm confident that what we've been able to do in this most challenging year shows that we're going to get there. But this is a marathon; it's not a sprint. This growth plan requires that we first must stop the slide from the past. It's not a light switch recovery; this is a rheostat recovery. And it will migrate into 2021 for sure. That all said, these are exciting and unique times, and I look forward to continuing this journey with you, and certainly with the team. So now I'd like to turn it over to Brian for a detailed look at our financials. And I'd like to thank you very much for your time today.

Thanks, Cliff. And thanks, everyone for joining. As we've done in the past, we're reporting both GAAP and non-GAAP numbers. The reconciliations are in our filings and in the appendix of the presentation. I will start on Slide 9 to review the segmented and consolidated estimated impact of COVID-19 on revenue for the quarter and year-to-date. On the total company, COVID-19 had approximately a $3 million positive impact on revenue, driven by higher COVID-related volumes in our government segment, mostly offset by lower volumes in our transportation and commercial segments. Year-to-date, COVID has had a negative impact on revenue of $46 million, leading to a total decline of 6.7%. Excluding the COVID impact, we would have seen year-to-date revenue down approximately 5.3%, better than the 6% to 8% initial guidance range that we provided at the start of the year. Looking specifically at the segments for the third quarter, the negative revenue impact of COVID-19 on the commercial segment was approximately $48 million. This was driven by lower volumes with our business outsourcing solutions, commercial healthcare, and customer experience offerings, as well as the interest rate impact on our BenefitWallet business within our HR and learning business. Q3 revenue in the government segment benefited from COVID-19 by an estimated $68 million. The continued strong activity in our government business was primarily driven by increased volumes in SNAP and pandemic SNAP programs and high volumes in our unemployment insurance prepaid card offerings. Revenue was also impacted by a month of the Federal unemployment supplement in July and from FEMA-related funds, as well as the spend related to access funds from this program, which remained on the cards from prior months. In transportation, we saw tolling volumes continue to recover; however, volumes in the curbside management business remained under pressure and we saw some negative impact to transit. All in all, this resulted in a $17 million negative revenue impact to this segment. Let's move on to Slide 10 to discuss the Q3 2020 P&L. As Cliff discussed, we had another strong quarter with results coming in above both internal and external expectations. Revenue for the quarter was down 5.2% compared with our third quarter results last year, or 5.4% in constant currency. These results were better than expected primarily driven by COVID-19 related volumes in the government segment and a faster-than-expected recovery of our transportation segment. From a year-over-year perspective, the decline was primarily driven by prior year lost business, partially offset by new business ramp. Adjusted EBITDA of $141 million showed 1% growth year-over-year. This represents an adjusted EBITDA margin of 13.5%, a 190 basis point improvement compared with Q3 of the prior year. This was driven primarily by our cost program, which includes both temporary and permanent savings and the mix of revenue, given the higher volumes in our government business. Restructuring spend for the quarter was $20 million, driven by our cost and expense reduction program, data center migration, and transformation program. We now anticipate restructuring for the year to be approximately $65 million, slightly higher than the $60 million target we discussed on the last call. Let's turn to Slide 11 to go over the segment results. As discussed last quarter, we have allocated a significant amount of our previously unallocated expenses to the segments. These newly allocated costs include certain IT expenses, corporate support, and compensation items. We have the details of this change in our metrics filed. In the third quarter, our commercial business revenue declined 10.4%, primarily driven by COVID-19 related declines in prior year lost business. Adjusted EBITDA was down 36%, while adjusted EBITDA margin of 10.8% was down 430 basis points year-over-year. The adjusted EBITDA decline was primarily driven by COVID-19 and non-recurring client items, and these impacts are partially offset by our cost actions. Our government business grew by 9.1% for the quarter. This was primarily driven by an increase in COVID-related volumes and the ramp of new business, partially offset by the loss of the California Medicaid contract. I want to remind you that at the beginning of the year, we had anticipated that the California Medicaid contract would have a three-percentage point negative impact on total company year-over-year top line declines. As stated on the last call, this is now expected to be closer to a two-percentage point impact in 2020 as we continue to benefit from transition work this year. We have approximately $35 million in transition revenue associated with this contract that will negatively impact the first three quarters of 2021 on a year-over-year basis. Government adjusted EBITDA increased by 66%, while adjusted EBITDA margins of 36.8% increased by 13 percentage points. As I discussed earlier, the margin improvement was due to higher volumes from COVID-19 related work and our cost savings program. Our transportation segment revenue declined by 12.9% compared to the third quarter of last year. This was primarily driven by COVID-19 related pressure as well as the tough comparison for the transit business, which benefited from high equipment installations in Q3 2019. Adjusted EBITDA was up 3% compared with Q3 2020, driven by the cost savings program. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 20%, up 310 basis points year-over-year. As I mentioned, we have allocated a significant portion of our unallocated costs into the segments to provide greater visibility into the profitability of each segment. In the third quarter, our unallocated costs were $78 million higher than in Q3 2019. The increase was driven by a one-time COVID-related item and bringing back our annual employee bonus, which we did not pay in 2019. This was partially offset by our cost reduction efforts. I'll note that bringing back the annual bonus also impacted the segments. Let's now turn to Slide 12 to discuss the strength of our balance sheet and cash flow. Our balance sheet continued to be healthy with $496 million in cash at the end of the third quarter. Our net leverage ratio came down slightly from last quarter and was 2.4 turns, in line with our target of two to two and a half turns. We continue to have a solid liquidity position. In addition to our cash on hand, our revolver had approximately $592 million of capacity available at the end of the quarter. As we show on the debt maturity table, our first major debt maturity isn't until the end of 2022, and we will opportunistically look to refinance all or a portion of our debt over the course of the next 12 months. Operating cash flow for the quarter was an inflow of $107 million, and adjusted free cash flow was $72 million, a $99 million improvement over the same quarter last year. This is driven primarily by working capital timing and a payroll tax deferral related to the CARES Act. CapEx was $35 million for the quarter or 3.4% of revenue. We still expect to spend approximately $140 million in CapEx in 2020. Let's move to Slide 13 to discuss our outlook for how we will end the year. We anticipate that revenue will decline between 6.4% and 7.4%, which would be approximately $4.1 billion to $4.15 billion for the year. We expect to achieve an adjusted EBITDA margin of between 11.25% and 11.75%. We have also provided an outlook on cash conversion from adjusted EBITDA for the year. We expect to convert approximately 20% of full year adjusted EBITDA to adjusted free cash flow. This would be at the high end of the range that we provided at the beginning of the year. These guidance ranges do not include any impacts that could result from a federal stimulus package and assumes continued recovery in certain businesses, such as our tolling operations. Obviously, given the current environment, these assumptions could change. Regardless, I want to note that the midpoint of our revenue guidance range is in line with the initial outlook we gave on the Q4 2019 earnings call in February, prior to any contemplation of a meaningful COVID impact. Also, our adjusted EBITDA range implies a higher outlook than the guidance we gave at that time. Despite all the challenges that COVID-19 has brought, our business is showing tremendous resiliency. As Cliff mentioned, this is thanks to the hard work and dedication of our team. We are continuing to deliver for our clients, and our transformation is on the right track. I want to thank our associates, shareholders, and clients for their continued support. We will now open up the lines for some questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. The first question today comes from Shannon Cross of Cross Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. My first question is, can you talk about the strong signings that you've had this quarter? And it seems like you're on track for that. And how we should think about how they'll roll through the P&L both from a startup cost perspective, as well as a revenue perspective. And maybe if you can give us an idea of sort of the breadth and depth of where these contracts are coming from. And then I have a follow-up. Thank you.

Yeah. Sure. Shannon, thank you. As you can tell, we've doubled the new business signings on a quarter-over-quarter basis, though the difference between Q2 and Q3 is we hit a lot more singles and doubles in Q3. And we didn't have these - we had one large contract signed in Q3, but several signed in Q2. And so what we saw in Q3 is the duration of the contracts are about a year less than a little over four years versus a little over five years in Q2. And what we really want to see is that continued singles and doubles because the home runs are somewhat episodic. And that's exactly what we found in Q3. We want to repeat that in Q4. Now as it relates to the ramp, obviously, the smaller ones ramp faster. A lot of times those big contracts are in the public sector space, and they have a longer ramp. The exact ramp speed and the revenue recognition is kind of all over the place. You got to look at it from many, many factors, as you know, Shannon, whether it's volume swings, ramp-off, ramp-up timing, add-on business, et cetera, et cetera. So what I can say unequivocally is the ramp-off of business from 2020 to 2021 is much less than we had between 2019 and 2020. That said, everything goes into a mixture, and it contributes to this pivot to growth question that I think you're somewhat alluding to that COVID kind of confounds. So bottom line is we're really happy with our retention rate. We're really happy with our sales and our ramp and our ramp discipline. We're starting to mute the downward slide from previously lost business. We're retaining more volume than we had in the past. And once we get COVID under control and understand exactly what the impacts are from COVID, which is very uncertain, as you can imagine, we'll know exactly what that means for the growth rate in 2021.

Thank you, that's helpful. You mentioned a bit on the call that you're able to, with COVID, maybe rethink some processes. And that, I mean, a number of our companies we cover have said we had all these cost savings, but some of them are starting to go away because eventually people will travel and do other things and go back to the office. Can you talk maybe a bit about how you think you can maybe fundamentally reshape how business is done? And what it means for your company?

Yeah, it's a great question. So the way we look at - in the cost savings for 2020, about a third of them are temporary. So to your point, as people get back on the road, there's the travel and all the other things that come with running a business where 75% of your people aren't working from home, those costs savings are temporary and will start to ramp back up as COVID becomes less significant, and we get back in the office. Just a couple of things - a couple components there, we're never going to probably get back to the same exact place we were pre-COVID. We'll have more work from home, but we're not going to have 75% of us working from home, number one. And so what we've - the other two-thirds of the cost savings are permanent. And those will migrate into 2021, as you would expect. But we're not done with these efficiency plays. Most of the cost savings and those permanent plays we had were associated with maintaining operating leverage, as you can imagine, with revenue coming down. We can't afford to keep the same variable cost up. So we took some spends and layers out; we changed some of the people models to take some of the cost savings out, and those are certainly permanent. Now as we get into 2021, we need to migrate into a more shared service operations environment where we can leverage process improvement, where we can leverage the scale of a shared service, and get more marginal, incremental, slowly but surely, cost savings - call it efficiency plays expense reductions as opposed to cost reduction. So it wasn't necessarily COVID related; because that is just where we are in our morphing the business to something that's not as siloed and it's something that's more shared, so we can leverage scale. That's where the migration plan is.

Great, I think it's fine.

The next question comes from Puneet Jain of JP Morgan. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking my question. Very nice quarter. And it was great to see solid bookings, not just on a year-on-year basis, but also related to revenue base. But I wanted to ask about revenue attrition. You mentioned it's better than last year. But is it at a place where you'd like it to be? Like, how should we think about the overall attrition, whether it's pricing, whether it's contract loss as a percentage of revenue right now, obviously, excluding near-term COVID impact?

Yeah. So Puneet, it's a great question. And we think it was really unacceptable the amount of attrition - remember, attrition run-off in some of these large-scale businesses can take two and three years. Caymus is a great example of that. And so what we lost in 2019 was the accumulation of 2018 and '19 running off in 2020. What I can tell you is that same run-off kind of framework is significantly lower between 2020 and 2021. But it's a churn where we're renewing business, sometimes our price reductions, and the ramp for new businesses affected the volume swings. In this business, volume can swing quite significantly within any given contract. And so what I would tell you is retention is better. It will never be good enough. Any lost contract, any lost revenue is not good for us in our mind. But it's significantly better retention rates than we had in the previous years, between '18 and '19, as opposed to '19 and '20. So all that is back to what I said to Shannon; those are all contributors to this equation we're trying to put together that we plan to brief you on in Q1 where we can look at this notion of a trailing 12-month revenue stream. So you can start to get a good view at recurring revenue. And then we hope to have some estimates into forward-looking 12 months so we can have more of a predictive revenue slope in the future. And all the things you just mentioned contribute to that. Unfortunately, COVID is throwing a significant wrench into it because it creates quite a bit of uncertainty in the assumptions we put into the equation. But there'll be a lot more to talk about in Q1 once we have more certainty from COVID and once we have this equation drawn out. But the bottom-line answer to your question is much improved. I don't want to commit to an exact amount, but let me just say retention is significantly improved on a year-over-year basis.

Got it and then your average contract duration was four years versus below three years last year. And all of the second half last year it was below three years. So is four years then the right level of contract duration? And does it indicate lower pricing pressures as renewals come a little bit more par out?

No, I don't think it's pricing relevant. I think - well, the sweet spot we think is around four years. Some of these big public sector contracts can be 10 years long. And so that can skew your average and these - remember that the numbers in the average number is not a median number; it's an average number. And so that can be skewed pretty significantly. And because our sales efforts were not adequate in 2019, and a lot of the deals we were doing were really small, they were shorter in duration, and that's why the tenure was around three years. We think the sweet spot is about four, where we get a lot of these singles and doubles that are hitting about three-year contract duration, and then you get some of the big ones that will skew the average up a little bit. We want both. We want some of the big ones that have long contract tails and high TCV and reasonable ARR. But we want these three-year, $30 million, $40 million, $50 million deals too because that's the bread and butter for the future.

Okay, thank you.

The next question comes from Mayank Tandon of Needham. Please go ahead.

Hey, good evening. It's actually Kyle Peterson on for Mayank. Thanks for taking our questions. So to touch on the margins that came in really strong this quarter, I know that you guys said maybe like one third of these kind of cost savings are probably more temporary in nature. But I think last quarter, we kind of talked and you mentioned that maybe like 10.5 to 11.5 would be kind of the right way to think about the EBITDA margin for the next year or so. I mean, is there anything based on this quarter's performance, and then kind of implied EBITDA range and the outlook kind of changes that calculus here over the next few quarters?

Yeah. So it's Brian. So what I would say is that we did have strong margins in the quarter, and that was helped by the government volumes. When we have a higher government mix that's at a higher margin, and we had good flow-through of our cost savings program. When we think about next year, we will continue to get flow-through from the permanent savings, which are about two-thirds of the over $140 million of savings. We think that's about $50 million of the benefit next year. But we also think as COVID starts to normalize, the mix advantage will reverse. And so based on those factors, and it's really hard, as Cliff mentioned, with the COVID uncertainty to exactly get this right. But we think around an 11% margin, compared to 11.25% to 11.75% for this year. We'd probably be closer to an 11% margin, maybe a bit better next year.

Okay, that's good to know. And then, I guess, just a little bit on the government business. Has there been any timing volatility that we need to keep in mind? I know with some of the Federal supplement through the FEMA program, I know there was some kind of time drags and delays in getting people some of those extra funds. Should we expect any kind of spillover benefit into the fourth quarter as people kind of spend these balances down? Or is that not going to be a factor in the upcoming quarter?

Yeah, Brian can fill in the gaps. But what I would say is it will be modest, very modest deliver. And as your guess is as good as ours as to what might change in the subsidy equation at the federal level. As you may know, most of our business is at the state and local level. But these federal subsidies flow through the state. So the jury's still out on what's going to happen, but there'll be some modest flow through. Brian, do you want to comment further?

Yeah, I would say that in Q3, we benefited from one month of the Federal supplement, unemployment supplement, which happened in July plus, as you mentioned, the FEMA funds. Those are expected to repeat in Q4. So the positive impact from COVID in Q4 from government is likely to be lower than Q3. We still see some benefit from SNAP and pandemic SNAP and from just higher unemployment, but it won't be as high, and we actually expect the net impact from COVID to be negative. And then the only positive in that is the underlying business excluding COVID. We expect a better trend going from Q3 to Q4. So we expect the net revenue decline to improve in Q4 versus Q3 just normalizing for COVID.

Alright, that's helpful. Thanks, guys. Nice quarter.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Bryan Bergin of Cowen. Please go ahead.

Thanks. This is Zach Edelman in for Brian. A couple of questions around the sales force. How should we think about investments over the coming quarters? And also can you talk about the sales team's attribution to the bookings in Q3 and you see more broad-based contributions?

Yeah, so Zach, the sales journey here is both from a new business global sales organization perspective, as well as an account management and add-on basis, both of those are critical to our future and our success. Think about probably two-thirds of the TCV is coming from the GSO longer-term, kind of sales organization, global sales organization, and one-third from the account management and add-on. But the inverse is true when it comes to impact revenue; we're saying year revenue where two-thirds of the impact revenue is coming from those account managers in that add-on revenue, and one-third of the impact revenue, even though the ARR is higher, is coming from the global sales organization. And so what we've been doing in our journey has really been about leadership, about discipline, about oversight, about focused concentration on sales. We're going to finish the year worried about 110 sales exits, today 109, 110, we expect to launch into 2021 with about 120 with constant sort of improvement across the sales force resident along the way and into the future. And so we see some pretty consistent performance coming out of our sales force. In the investment, if you're alluding to investment within sales, as opposed to investments writ large, are really now, we think between 120 to 130 is kind of the right mix given our portfolio. The new investments are going to be more around training, around training protocols, training software, training discipline, and consistency around account management and portfolio management. So it's a journey. It starts with talent; it moves to process, and within that process is some of the software that I just discussed. But if that's the investment you're referring to, that's kind of what's next for us.

Yeah, good context thanks. And just a follow-up, are clients starting to dictate the mix of remote services versus on-site delivery within new contracts? Or is it still too early to tell there?

This is a very interesting question and interesting dynamic. When COVID first hit, it's a weird journey; when COVID first hit, there was a lot of resistance to move from home to move to home. And then all of a sudden, everybody panicked and said, why isn't there more at home? And now as we start - we've created a return to work from work kind of plan, it won't be 75% from the office to where it was. Right now, we're at 25%. You can't run a print facility from your home. So the 25% that we have working from offices are really required personnel that need to be there. That'll migrate to somewhere between where we are now and the 75% work from office. One of the ingredients is what you alluded to is what is the client expectation. In some cases, some of the Federal - some of the public sector contracts we have, they require that we be in a facility in their state or in their community. It's all part of the game that they have to play as a state leader and trying to get more business and more people to work in their state or their local community. So in some cases, we're going to need to migrate back to offices. In some cases, the remote workforce is going to be more allowed. So if I were to guess, I think it's somewhere in the middle. There's more tolerance than we had before. But in some cases, there'll be contract requirements to be back in an office, and that's all work underway as we speak.

Got it. Thanks again.

Listen, thank you everybody. These are obviously very different times. But also, I'd like to thank everyone for joining. I hope you and your family stay safe, especially with a lot going on in the communities. And hope everyone has a great rest of the week. And again, really appreciate you joining us today.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.