Thank you for waiting, and welcome to the DigitalOcean Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All lines are muted to eliminate background noise. After the speaker's comments, there will be a question-and-answer session. Thank you. I would now like to hand the call over to Melanie Strate, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Thank you all for joining us today to review DigitalOcean's third quarter 2024 financial results. Joining me on the call today are Paddy Srinivasan, our Chief Executive Officer; and Matt Steinfort, our Chief Financial Officer. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call up to a question-and-answer session. Before we begin, let me remind you that certain statements made on the call today may be considered forward-looking statements, which reflect management's best judgment based on currently available information. I refer specifically to the discussion of our expectations and beliefs regarding our financial outlook for the fourth quarter and the full year 2024, as well as our business goals and outlook. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements. I direct your attention to the risk factors contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and those referenced in today's press release that is posted on our website. DigitalOcean expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements made today. Additionally, non-GAAP financial measures will be measured on this conference call and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are also available in today's press release as well as in our investor presentation that outlines the financial discussion on today's call. A webcast of today's call is also available in the IR section of our website. And with that, I will turn the call over to Paddy.

Thank you, Melanie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today as we review our third quarter 2024 results. DigitalOcean had a successful third quarter, continuing to deliver progress on our key metrics and executing on the initiatives we laid out earlier in the year, further establishing ourselves as the simplest scalable cloud. In my remarks today, I will briefly highlight our third quarter results, share tangible examples of how our increased pace of innovation is benefiting our customers, discuss the continued momentum we are seeing with our AI/ML platform and give an update on our strategic partnerships and engagement with the developer ecosystem. First, I would like to briefly recap our third quarter 2024 financial results. Revenue growth remained steady in the third quarter at 12% year-over-year with solid performance in core cloud and continued growth in AI, despite lapping difficult comps from our managed hosting price increase in April 2023 and from the Paperspace acquisition in July 2023. We continue to see momentum in demand for our AI/ML products, where Q3 ARR again grew close to 200% year-over-year. In addition, we saw revenue growth contributions from new customers and steady growth from the core business as we continue to enhance our customer success and go-to-market motions. Having delivered strong results through the first three quarters, we are increasing the lower end of our full year revenue guide by $5 million and the top end by $2 million. We continue to focus the majority of our product innovation and go-to-market investments on our builders and scalers, who drive 88% of our total revenue and are growing 15% year-over-year ahead of our overall 12% revenue growth. We also delivered strong adjusted EBITDA margins at 44% and have maintained our full year free cash flow margin guidance as we continue to manage costs effectively while still investing to accelerate product innovation in cloud and AI. Matt will walk you through more details on our financial results and guidance later in this call. Let me start by giving you an update on our core cloud computing platform. In Q3, we continued our increased product velocity, specifically focused on the needs of our largest and fastest-growing customer cohort, the 17,000-plus scalers that drive 58% of our total revenue and that grew 19% year-over-year in the quarter. In Q3, we released 42 new product features in total, which is almost double what we delivered in the previous quarter. We are accelerating features that will benefit our existing and potential scalers that are on other hyperscaler clouds today. Let me now provide a few highlights from these efforts that are specifically focused on the needs of these larger workloads. We announced the early availability of virtual private cloud peering or VPC peering for short, that gives customers the ability to connect two different VPCs on the DigitalOcean platform within a data center or between different data centers. Through VPC peering, customers can create strong data isolation and privacy via direct and secure networking between resources that doesn't expose traffic to the public Internet. Our global load balancer or GLB, is now generally available for all of our customers. GLB offers global traffic distribution based on the geographical proximity of the end user, enabling lower latency services, dynamic multi-regional traffic failover, enabling more service availability for our customers' applications, data center prioritization, edge caching, and automatic scaling of the load balancers. We are thrilled to be able to roll it out to all of our customers, particularly to our scaler customers with existing multinational deployments that will benefit directly from this new product. During the third quarter, we progressed daily backups from early availability to general availability, giving our customers the additional flexibility to manage backups at a daily and weekly cadence. This enables increased protection for our customers' workloads as with daily backups, we automatically retain the seven most recent backup copies. This was an explicit need given the large volume and growth of data we are seeing on our platform with our spaces object storage footprint growing 50% year-over-year. We're also launching larger droplet configurations, including 48 vCPU memory and storage optimized droplets, 60 vCPU, CPU optimized and general-purpose droplets and larger 7 terabytes and 10 terabytes disk density variant droplets. These large droplet configurations are particularly relevant to our scaler customers who can quickly scale up their workloads that require more CPU, memory, or storage versus horizontally scaling out with multiple nodes. In September, we announced Kubernetes log forwarding, which also enables Kubernetes customers centralized log management, simplifying the monitoring and troubleshooting of their applications on the DigitalOcean platform. This was built with simplicity in mind. With just a few clicks from the Kubernetes settings panel, customers can easily forward cluster event logs from Kubernetes directly to the DigitalOcean managed OpenSearch for further analysis. We also enhanced application security for our cloud-based managed hosting product by introducing a new Malware Protection solution and saw 3,650 net activations within the first week. To date, we have seen near-zero false positives or false negative rates from our malware detection. This Malware Protection capability is now one of the fastest-growing revenue-generating product models we have seen on our Managed Hosting platform. All these innovations are not only helping us meet the needs of our large customers, but also helping us move customers with these larger workloads from purely usage-based to committed contracts. For example, an existing cybersecurity customer of ours, Cyble, a leader in Threat Intelligence, signed a multiyear seven-figure commitment in this quarter. The decision to continue leveraging DigitalOcean and sign a multiyear deal was driven by the release of our new large premium CPU optimized droplets that helps customers run computationally heavy workloads. Cyble is a petabyte-scale company. After several weeks of diligence, they chose DigitalOcean for this new workload due to our scalability, coverage, and cost efficiency. Another great example is Traject Data, who signed a multiyear commitment for a broad portfolio of DigitalOcean services, including over 500 droplets, managed MongoDB, spaces, backups, and volumes. Traject Data requires robust scalable and reliable infrastructure to power their real-time clean and bulk data processing insights, serving domains including marketing, retail, and analytics. They use the DigitalOcean platform to host their APIs and manage vast amounts of search engine results page and e-commerce data to deliver critical insights to their customers. These product innovations and enhanced customer engagement are also helping customers migrate workloads to DigitalOcean from the hyperscalers. One specific example is PiCap, a leading ride-sharing and logistics company based in Latin America, operating in Mexico, Brazil, Peru, and Colombia, and they moved all of their workloads from various clouds to DigitalOcean in the third quarter. They migrated to DigitalOcean due to the simplicity of our products, transparent and simple pricing model, and strong support from our customer-facing teams. Another example is NOBID, a customer specializing in optimizing ad revenue for online publishers through real-time bidding technology. Upon technical validation of the DigitalOcean platform scale, they moved most of their large-scale production applications from a hyperscaler to the DigitalOcean platform, reinforcing our opportunity to increase our share of wallet with our scaler customers. Next, let me provide some updates on the AI/ML side. Our AI strategy reflects our belief that the AI market will evolve in a similar fashion to other major technology transformations with initial progress and monetization at the infrastructure layer which will eventually be eclipsed by the opportunities in value creation at the platform and application layers. Like others in the market today, we are actively participating in the infrastructure layer. But we are also innovating rapidly in the platform and application pillars to make it easy for our customers to use Gen AI at scale without requiring deep AI/ML expertise. This is where we see our differentiation as our customers seek to consume AI through platforms and agents rather than building everything themselves using raw GPU infrastructure. At the infrastructure layer, we made GPU droplets accelerated by NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPUs generally available to all of our customers. Now all DigitalOcean customers can leverage on-demand and fractional access to GPUs, which is a critical step in achieving our overarching mission of democratizing AI for all customers. In Q3, we also announced the early availability of NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU worker nodes on the DigitalOcean Kubernetes platform, or DOK for short, providing customers with a managed experience with GPU nodes ready with NVIDIA drivers, NVLink fabric manager, and NVIDIA container toolkit. Customers can take advantage of the NVIDIA GPU operator and NVIDIA Mellanox network operator to install a comprehensive suite of tools required for production deployment. Both GPU droplets and the H100 nodes on DOK are examples of how we are innovating even in the infrastructure layer, making it simpler for customers. Let me give you an example. Calian Exchange is a paytech company that specializes in providing enterprise blockchain-based solutions for bank payments. They're leveraging DigitalOcean's H100 infrastructure to accelerate the processing of high-volume financial transactions by providing advanced computational power. They use machine learning models to detect fraud in real-time, assess risk, and ensure that payments are processed securely and quickly. The GPU infrastructure allows them to process more transactions while maintaining low latency and improving the overall user experience for both banks and end customers. Next, at the platform layer. In this quarter, we launched the early availability of our new GenAI platform to select customers so that we can iterate with them and shape the product and keep it easy for them to build GenAI applications that deliver real business value. Users of this product will be able to combine their data with the power of foundational models, to create personalized agents, to integrate with their applications in just a few minutes. Customers can leverage our platform to create AI applications with foundational models and agent routing, knowledge bases, and retrieval augmented generation or RAG. This is a key step towards our software-centric AI strategy, which is aimed at enabling customers to drive business value from AI in a friction-free manner. An example of a customer that is already leveraging our GenAI platform is Autonoma Cloud, a planned digitization company that offers a platform for manufacturing plants and machine manufacturers. Autonoma Cloud creates and manages large volumes of documentation and data for each of their customers' plans and individual machines, and they are looking to create AI agents that understand their user-specific contexts and retrieve answers and machine-specific data to their queries. With DigitalOcean's new GenAI platform, they quickly built an interactive experience with their custom data that reduces the cognitive overhead for users. It is very important to note that these companies are not just doing internal proof of concepts or R&D projects, but are now starting to leverage our AI/ML products to build AI into their own products to deliver real business value to their customers without requiring deep expertise in AI, machine learning, data science, or data engineering. Finally, let me talk about the third pillar of our AI strategy, the application or agentic layer. As I just talked about, our customers are using our Gen AI platform to create their own AI-driven agents. In addition to that, we are also innovating on this front by further simplifying cloud computing using AI and automating workflows that were previously done by humans. One of the frequent pain points for our customers is debugging their cloud applications when something goes wrong because; one, it is a very complex set of technical tasks; and number two, they typically don't have specialized site reliability engineers, or SREs, available in their staff to perform these complex tasks. So, we set out to mitigate this pain point for our customers using Gen AI by building a new AI agent to perform some of these tasks that are typically done by human SREs. We are using this AI SRE agent both internally on our systems and externally by integrating it with our cloud-based products. Let me explain. Internally, we are using the AI SRE agent to help our human SREs troubleshoot ongoing technical incidents in the DigitalOcean cloud platform. Based on our initial internal data, the AI SRE agent is reducing the time it takes to identify root causes by almost 35% by leveraging AI to quickly process an enormous amount of log data from disparate systems to pinpoint root causes and make next step decisions, including recommendations to fix underlying problems. Externally, we integrated this AI SRE agent into our cloud-based product, which hosts hundreds of thousands of mission-critical websites. Today, when issues happen on customer services and applications, they have to work with support engineers to debug the root cause and then apply a fix. This is true not just for the DigitalOcean platform but across all managed hosting platforms. This can be a time-consuming job during which their businesses and even websites can be affected if not offline. Our new AI SRE agent jumps into action upon detection of any performance degradation due to common issues like aggressive bot crawlers and denial of service attacks, to investigate, gather insights, and provide recommendations in real-time on how to fix these issues, thereby reducing the time to resolution significantly. Our testing results are very encouraging, and we have just started working with a few customers in early availability mode. Rounding out our AI strategy, we opened up a new front door by launching a strategic partnership with Hugging Face in Q3. Hugging Face is the leading open-source and open-science platform that helps users build, deploy, and train machine-learning models. As a result of this partnership, DigitalOcean now offers model inferencing through one-click deployable models on GPU droplets, allowing users to quickly and easily deploy the most popular third-party models with the simplicity of GPU droplets and optimal performance accelerated by NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPUs. This offering simplifies the deployment complexity of the most popular open-source AI/ML models as DigitalOcean has natively integrated and optimized these models for GPU droplets, enabling fast deployment and superior performance. The Hugging Face partnership will make it easier for the more than 1.2 million Hugging Face users to discover and use the DigitalOcean platform. In Q3, we also announced a new partnership with Netlify, a leading web development platform, to enable customers to seamlessly connect their Netlify applications to DigitalOcean managed MongoDB, offering developers all the right tools to build and scale their applications without the complexities of managing infrastructure. These announcements, in addition to the various other partnerships we already have in flight, highlight our efforts to augment our durable product-led growth motion with additional channels, including new front doors through partnerships with leading players in our ecosystem that will also help shape and improve our product offerings. I'm also excited to highlight the material progress we are making with a renewed engagement with the developer community. In October, we hosted the 11th edition of Hacktoberfest, which has now evolved from being an internal hackathon event at DigitalOcean to one of the largest and premier open-source community events. This year, over 65,000 developers from 172 countries participated in more than 115 community-run events and contributed to 15,000 open-source projects. Beyond Hacktoberfest, we also hosted more than 10 DigitalOcean meetups for developers and the AI/ML community and participated in a number of industry conferences. This broad-based community engagement effort reinforces DigitalOcean's ongoing commitment to our developer ecosystem. In closing, I am encouraged by the progress on product innovation and customer engagement, particularly as it is helping our builder and scaler customers continue to grow on our platform as their businesses expand. We're also making great strides towards our software-centric AI vision by rapidly shipping products in each of the three layers: infrastructure, platform, and applications. We're starting to see the green shoots from these investments in the form of customer wins, including cloud migrations from the hyperscalers, multiyear commitment contracts, and real-world deployment of AI using the DigitalOcean AI platform. We will continue to focus on our largest and fastest-growing customer cohorts as we seek to accelerate growth in the quarters to come. Before I turn the call over to Matt, I'm very excited to share that we will be hosting an Investor Day in New York City, and we are currently targeting late March or early calendar Q2 2025, in which we will share more on our long-term strategy, including more detail on our progress and metrics as well as a view of our long-term financial outlook. I will now hand the call over to Matt Steinfort, our CFO, who will now provide some additional details on our financial results and our outlook for Q4 2024. Thank you.

Thanks, Paddy. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. As Paddy just covered, we had a very successful Q3, both executing on key initiatives and delivering solid financial performance. In Q3, we continued to see increased momentum from our AI/ML platform and steady growth across our core business while consistently delivering attractive adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow margins. Revenue in the third quarter was $198.5 million, up 12% year-over-year. Annual run rate revenue or ARR in the third quarter was $798.3 million, also up 12% year-over-year. We added $17 million of ARR in the quarter. Most notably, builders and scalers, which are our largest customers, together grew 15% year-over-year. Contributing to our overall growth was healthy incremental revenue from new customers and increased momentum from our AI/ML platform, which saw significant growth, again growing close to 200% year-over-year on an ARR basis. Overall growth was partially muted by our managed hosting platform as we are lapping difficult comps related to the April 2023 managed hosting price increase and a temporal surge of managed hosting revenue in Asia in late 2023. Our Q3 net dollar retention rate was steady at 97%. As with prior quarters, we continued to see consistent but below historical net expansion levels, while our churn levels have remained low for well over a year. We will continue efforts to improve growth in NDR, including executing our product roadmap, working to layer on additional go-to-market motions to complement our durable product-led growth engine. Turning to the P&L. Gross margin for the quarter was 60%, which was 100 basis points lower than the prior quarter and consistent with the prior year. We are able to maintain healthy gross margins while continuing our investment in AI infrastructure due to the success of our ongoing cost optimization efforts. Adjusted EBITDA was $87 million, an increase of 14% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 44% in the quarter, approximately 200 basis points higher than the prior quarter. This increase quarter-over-quarter was primarily driven again by our ongoing operating cost discipline. Diluted net income per share was $0.33, a 65% increase year-over-year, and non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.52, an 18% increase year-over-year. This increase is directly a result of our ability to increase our share profitability levels by continuing to drive operating leverage while mitigating through share buybacks. Finally, Q3 adjusted free cash flow was $26 million or 13% of revenue. This is lower than the prior quarter by approximately 600 basis points due to the timing of capital expense payments as we continue to make investments capitalized on the AI opportunity to fuel future growth. As a reminder, quarterly free cash flow margin will vary given the timing of capital spend and other working capital impacts. The lower free cash flow in Q3 does not change our expected full year free cash flow margin. Turning to our customer metrics. The number of builders and scalers on our platform, those that spend more than $50 per month, was approximately 163,000, representing an increase of 6% year-over-year. The revenue growth associated with builders and scalers was 15% year-over-year, ahead of our overall revenue growth rate of 12%. The number of builders and scalers on our platform, which together represent 88% of our total revenue, increased by 2,260 quarter-over-quarter. The continued growth of our larger spending cohorts is a direct result of our focused product development, much of which is driven by direct customer feedback, and the customer success and go-to-market investments that are concentrated on these builders and scalers. Our overall revenue mix continued to shift more towards our higher spend and higher growth customers, and we saw total ARPU increase 11% year-over-year to $102.51. Our balance sheet remains very strong as we ended the quarter with $440 million of cash and cash equivalents. We also continue to execute against our share repurchase program with $11 million of repurchases in the quarter, bringing total share repurchases to $29.9 million through the first three quarters of the year. With our healthy cash position and ongoing free cash flow generation, we are well positioned to continue to balance investment in organic growth with share repurchases while moving towards our 2.4 times to 3 times net leverage target and maintaining appropriate flexibility to address our 2026 convert at the appropriate time. Moving on to guidance. Based on our performance year-to-date, we are increasing the bottom end of our full year 2024 revenue guide by $5 million and the top by $2 million, projecting revenue to be in the range of $775 million to $777 million, a $3.5 million increase in the midpoint of our guidance range, which will represent year-over-year growth of approximately 12%. This full year guide implies Q4 revenue to be in the range of $199 million to $201 million, representing approximately 11% year-over-year growth at the midpoint of our guidance range. While we are not yet going to provide 2025 revenue guidance, we expect to enter 2025 with baseline growth in the low to mid-teens. As demonstrated throughout 2024, we remain committed to driving continued operating leverage in our core DigitalOcean platform. Given our solid performance throughout the first three quarters of the year, we are raising our adjusted EBITDA margin guidance for the full year to be in the range of 40% to 41%. This full year adjusted EBITDA guide implies Q4 adjusted EBITDA margins to be in the range of 34% to 38%. For the full year, we expect non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to be $1.70 to $1.75. This implies Q4 non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to be $0.27 to $0.32 based on approximately $103 million to $104 million in weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding. Turning to adjusted free cash flow. We expect adjusted free cash flow margins for the full year to be in the range of 15% to 17%, consistent with what we guided in the prior quarter. While free cash flow margin will continue to vary quarter-to-quarter, we anticipate remaining in a similar 15% to 17% range on the rolling average quarterly basis in 2025 as we continue to accelerate the pace of product innovation and make disciplined investments to expand our emerging AI capabilities. That concludes our prepared remarks, and we will now open up the call to Q&A.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Your first question comes from the line of Raimo Lenschow from Barclays. Your line is open.

Perfect. Thank you. Paddy, there is a lot of product innovation that you discussed. Can you talk a little bit about how we have to think about those new innovations around product and how that feeds into the installed base in terms of like what's the uptake there, what's the timing there? Because the financial number Matt and us will look at as NRR is 97% stable, but there seems to be a little bit of a disconnect. Can you maybe talk to timing there, et cetera? And I have 1 follow-up for Matt.

Thank you for the question. We are experiencing significant product innovation across our core cloud offerings. I took time to detail the advancements we are making, particularly in data and scalers, which enable them to handle larger workloads on DigitalOcean. There isn't a straightforward answer that correlates our product innovations with customer adoption and our financial performance. However, we believe it's essential to create compelling reasons for our customers to migrate larger workloads from other clouds to our platform. As I mentioned earlier, we are beginning to showcase concrete examples of customers transitioning to multiyear contracts with commitments to our platform. We are also witnessing a continuous influx of migrations from other clouds, especially the hyperscalers. We need to maintain patience as we develop these capabilities; we are beginning to see initial signs of customer adoption that may lead to improved metrics. If we continue this trend over several quarters, we expect these improvements to reflect in key performance indicators. Regarding Net Dollar Retention, Matt pointed out that the core business NDR is slightly outperforming what we report on a blended basis, suggesting our efforts are starting to be recognized by customers. It’s important to remember that with over 638,000 customers, it takes time for changes to ripple throughout our entire customer base.

Thank you, Matt. I'm interested in the EBITDA, which we are currently outperforming. Can you discuss how we achieved this and the sustainability of this progression, especially with more services being introduced and the anticipated increase in AI services? Thank you.

Thanks, Raimo. Yes, I'd say from a cost standpoint, Q2 was definitely a good quarter from an EBITDA margin perspective. As we brought on our new executives, we had talked about implicit in our guide for the full year. We were making sure that we had enough room to invest to enable them to really improve the pace of innovation and layer on additional go-to-market motion. But at the same time, we were evaluating, okay, what costs do we have now that we just aren't earning a return on? And can we clean those out before the team gets going with the new expenses? So we, I think, did a really good job of optimizing for that. And we also made some decisions to make sure that we were appropriately pacing the increases to see if we're getting a return on the investments as we did it. So I think it was just disciplined cost management in Q3. And as you saw from the guide in Q4, we are expecting to ramp our expenses heading into next year. I don't think it's going to be a meaningful change in the overall expense level. We feel pretty good about the kind of the trailing margin profile that we have and being able to continue that into next year.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Cikos from Needham. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks for taking my question, guys. I think the first would go to Matt, just coming off of Raimo's question there. But if I look at the EBITDA guide that we have today, the 34% to 38% margin guide in Q4 is the widest range that I think we've had in recent memory. And just wanted to get a little bit more granular there as far as I guess, what needs to go wrong or right or what you guys are weighing for that gets you at the 34% margin versus the 38% margin in December quarter?

Yes, it's a good question, Mike. Part of it is that as we've been increasing our R&D spending, we are considering using contractors to accelerate certain areas on the product roadmap and the timing of that. I see this as a potentially uneven investment, and the timing for getting that fully operational could vary, whether it happens in Q1 or Q4, which is contributing to the range. Moving forward, we do not expect a significant change in overall R&D as a percentage of revenue, but we are increasing expenses. Therefore, in any given quarter, it might fluctuate a bit more. However, over a longer period, we believe we will adapt to that, and some of this is due to using additional resources.

Terrific. And just another follow-up. I know that you guys aren't providing explicit guidance for 2025 here. I do appreciate the qualitative commentary. Just wanted to see what gives you the confidence to kind of put that bogey out there for the baseline growth? And how should we be thinking about what it takes for DigitalOcean to be entering the year with that kind of baseline growth that you had commented on?

Yes, I think it's very similar to what we described at the beginning of this year, right? What can you count on? Well, you can count on the growth on the self-serve funnel, and we're a little bit better, doing a little bit better than that, on that year-to-date, and we had outlined at the beginning of the year. We've got the managed hosting business, which is kind of returning to growth after lapping some difficult comps. We've got AI/ML that we had said would contribute around 3 points of growth. It's a little bit ahead of that for the year. And then NDR, while it's frustrating that we've had to print a bunch of 97s in a row. As Paddy said, the core DO, NDR is actually ahead of that. We've got a little bit of a headwind for managed hosting that's going to be in place for the next, call it, through the first quarter of next year. And so if you take all those together, we've moved up a couple of points from the baseline growth that we had described coming into the year. And none of it is on the back of kind of macro improvements. It's steady kind of improvements and continuing to deploy products that our customers need. And so as we look at that trajectory, we feel comfortable kind of at the pace of growth that we're at right now and hopefully continuing to improve NDR every month going into next year and beyond to eventually get it to be above 100%. So, I'd say we're just making sure that folks understand that we feel pretty comfortable with the baseline growth that we're delivering.

Your next question comes from the line of James Fish from Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Hey Paddy, are you seeing more adoption of the GPU droplet from builders and scalers, or mostly from new customers? Also, how should we consider the balance between on-demand offerings and contracts, as well as the current supply availability for GPUs?

Yes, great. Thank you, Jim, for the question. So, in terms of the adoption, we are seeing adoption across the board. A lot of new customers, which we absolutely love, that are taking the tires and also explained on the call, building real-world applications on our GPU infrastructure, both droplets as well as more hard and bare metal type of services. I would say from between on-demand versus contract, we see more contracts when the customer is deploying live workloads, whether it is training or inferencing. And sometimes these contracts are fairly short term, but some are longer term. On-demand is typically for experimentation, which is what we would have guessed when we started this journey, but that's where things are. And from an on-demand point of view, we're also seeing a very nice uptick and interest in our GenAI platform. So companies that don't have the deep bench in terms of AI/ML skill set have a very easy time just using our GenAI platform, standing something up very quickly, many times in just a matter of a few minutes just to see if they can prove to themselves that there's value in integrating GenAI into their platform. So that's what we are seeing broadly from an adoption point of view.

From a supply chain perspective, we do not face the same challenges that we encountered at the start of the year. We have orders placed for the next generation of technology, including H-200s. We are monitoring the timing of Blackwell. While the supply chain is not so tight that equipment can be delivered within a week or two of ordering, it is open enough for us to receive equipment when needed. With the construction of the Atlanta data center beginning early next year, we are in a good position regarding logistics and scheduling.

Got it. And then, Matt, for you, circling back on the 97% net expansion rate. The AI side of things turned organic this quarter. By my math, it's probably adding about 1 to 2 points to NRR as it looks like net new ARR for AI was up around $10 million. So what's going on with that core business? Specifically, you were starting to mention around Cloudways, obviously, the price increase lapping, but why is that business kind of weaker than what you guys are anticipating? And how should we think about the mix of Cloudways hosting DigitalOcean versus other cloud platforms?

That's a great question and good clarification. AI products are not included in net dollar retention. The revenue from AI products does not contribute to NDR. Much of the AI revenue is project-based; for instance, someone may train a model for a short period and then shift their focus. This results in fluctuating revenue rather than consistent, large-scale workloads that would suggest a predictable increase in revenue. Currently, AI does not impact our NDR, meaning it hasn't contributed to the improvement we've observed. However, we have seen consistent growth in our core cloud business, which is performing better than the reported NDR. Cloudways, which traditionally had a positive impact on NDR until we adjusted pricing, has become a challenge for NDR since April and will likely continue to be so until next April due to the nature of lagging metrics. Nonetheless, we are optimistic about getting both Cloudways and our core DigitalOcean business back above a 100 NDR, and we are actively working towards that goal. While we can't specify when this will occur, we are encouraged by the early signs of improvement in both areas.

Your next question comes from the line of Gabriela Borges from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Matt, I wanted to follow-up some of your comments for 2025 and more specifically on how we should think about the seasonality of the business, given some of the moving pieces we've had this year versus last year. So any comments on seasonality? And I'm noticing that the size of the beat this quarter was about 1% versus the 2% last quarter. Any nuances we should be aware of there in terms of why the size of the beat was smaller this quarter? Thank you.

I don't think there's any seasonality in the business that would reflect that. I think that again, we've been very focused on the full year and providing guidance that's appropriate and reflective of that, that causes kind of bigger wins than the quarterly kind of beats, right? So we're more focused, I think, from an annual standpoint. But I think that as we look at the business going into next year, again, going back to my earlier comments, we're very encouraged by the steady growth that we're seeing and improving growth versus what we thought with the self-serve funnel and feel confident about that. The managed hosting business is coming back from, again, some difficult comps. The AI business is likely ahead of where we had expected and kind of in the last thing to move for us, which would give us the confidence to increase our outlook on the revenue is that NDR just needs to come up and expenses steadily, but stubbornly moving up. And so I don't think there's anything seasonal that would suggest we would be more or less on an individual quarter.

Got it. Okay. And then the follow-up is for Paddy. So given the paper change that we're seeing in the GPU as a service market. Maybe you could walk us through what are one or two of the areas where you feel like you've learned the most over the last three months as it relates to your AI services strategy and particularly around your LLM as a service offerings, the platform offerings, how you think you can differentiate versus something like a SageMaker or Bedrock? Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Over the past 90 days, we've gained significant insights. We've delivered a lot as well, and in doing so, we've learned extensively across all three levels of our platforms. Personally, my key realization has been that our customers, often lacking extensive machine learning expertise or substantial engineering teams, approach the AI platform differently than we do. While everyone views it from the perspective of infrastructure first, then platform, and finally applications, our customers start from the application level. They ask what applications or agents they can use today from Gen AI to enhance their productiveness, save costs, or drive innovations that weren't possible before. This understanding has driven us to expedite our Gen AI platform capabilities, and we've already seen a customer implement it in production, which is impressive. Regarding your question on how our Gen AI platform differentiates from solutions like SageMaker or Bedrock, we possess deep knowledge of both. While the technologies you mentioned are exceptional, they are most effective for users with a wide array of skills to create sophisticated solutions for complex scenarios. In contrast, the customer I referenced in my earlier remarks evaluated several Gen AI platforms and chose ours mainly due to its straightforwardness in integrating their own data, building a RAG pipeline, developing a knowledge base, and ultimately creating a chatbot that allowed them to forecast costs and establish a customer-friendly business model. Each of these steps individually is quite intricate, but the cumulative complexity when constructing a production application can be overwhelming. We have worked to track every action it takes to make the process easier for our customers. This effort is how we've positioned ourselves as a credible cloud provider and how we aim to differentiate in Gen AI. Additionally, we've been advancing our offerings in the agent sphere as well. We’ve recently launched our first agent and are collaborating with customers in an early access phase to accelerate our learning and innovation. The synergy between our platform and applications enables us to create solutions that are highly scalable and significantly simpler to use than those from other platforms available in the market.

Thank you for the detail.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Hickey from UBS. Your line is open.

Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. The first one, I wanted to ask is it's very helpful just detailing that AI is not included in the NDR metric. But maybe with some of the existing AI customers that you've had a few quarters that maybe do have some workloads already in production, do you have any sense of like how they're expanding their spend over time, maybe even just on a quarterly basis? Or do you typically see those customers kind of launch a workload and then have that spend at sort of a stable level from there?

We've seen good traction with a number of our early AI customers that have come in and experimented on the platform, and they may have started with a small cluster. And as they touched it, they’ve expanded their use of the platform. So if the question is when we land customers, do we see them grow or do we see a big rotation of customers in and out, we actually see a fairly healthy expansion from the customers when they come in. But again, back to my earlier comment, it's in, okay, I'm training a model. I need eight nodes. And now I'm going to do something, I need more. But it's not the same dynamic because they're still evaluating. They're still going through the testing phases. But we've seen very good traction, growing customers, the initial customers that we've had on the AI platform.

It's noteworthy that our AI customers share many similarities with our core cloud customers, as most, if not all, are independent software vendors or digital native application providers. They are constructing solutions on our AI platforms, whether it involves infrastructure or generative AI, to develop software solutions for their clients. As these customers grow and expand, they are also increasing their presence on our platform. This observation is particularly significant in contrast to customers who are only building solutions for internal use.

Got it. That's really helpful. And then one just quick follow-up. You mentioned earlier about just supply and that's gotten better relative to the beginning of the year for AI investments. Just curious with the October 1 launch of H100 instances broadly available. Are you supply constrained at all right now as we're kind of in the fourth quarter? Or are you able to meet all the demand you currently have as well? Thanks.

We've ordered enough. And we talked about this in the last earnings because we have the ability to see the demand and plan out the capacity, that we've been able to get enough capacity to meet the demand as we've gone, which is a very good sign because we don't have those supply constraints. So again, because we're not spending hundreds of millions of dollars on GPU, we can get the quantums that we need to meet our requirements. And when you have something like the GPU droplet, which is more on demand and it's less committed contract, you have to see what the utilization is and then plan your purchases based on that capacity utilization. And we've been able to manage that effectively. So it hasn't been a drag or a constraint for us.

Your next question comes from the line of Josh Baer from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks for the question. One for Paddy, I guess just thinking about the 42 new product features more than the higher period, and I think calling out some of them features that hyperscale customers are generally looking for, moving contracts to committed contracts, even migrating workloads from hyperscalers to DO. It's like in the past, the story was more about DigitalOcean's simplicity of the platform and better support, lower pricing and maybe a little bit less about getting into the competitive dynamic with hyperscale. Just wondering, is the right takeaway that there is a little bit of a shift in focus, either upmarket or a little bit of expansion outside the simplest start-ups in SMBs just to be a little bit more competitive in the market? Is there a strategy shift there?

Yes. Thank you, Josh. Great question, as always. The shift is essentially following our customers' fleet, honestly. So as I made a point during the prepared statements to make sure that we are not abandoning or taking our eye off being part of the DigitalOcean and the developer community. We continue to nurture that. In fact, we are doing a lot more with the developer ecosystem this year compared to the recent past. But at the same time, we do recognize that we have 17,000 hyperscalers who on average spend more than $25,000 with us. That's a big, and that's 58% of our revenue. And if you add scalers, that's almost 88% of our revenue, which are growing much faster than our blended average growth rate. So we have a unique opportunity to follow their lead and make sure that we are delivering capabilities that will enable them to run or expand their footprint on DigitalOcean. We are increasingly in a multi-cloud world even for smaller customers, like the ones we target. There is an opportunity for us to keep expanding our share of wallet to these companies. And the examples that I shared are just a starting point for what we believe our fair share slice of this enormous market. If we keep doing what we are doing now, which is add compelling feature sets that enable our scaler customers to expand their footprint on us, I think there's a lot of value to be created for our customers on our platform.

If I could follow up with one for Matt. Regarding some of the factors I mentioned earlier, such as managed hosting, challenging comparisons, pricing increases, the influx of revenue from Asia, and some aspects of M&A, I understand how these could be affecting metrics like the net dollar retention rate or year-over-year growth. Looking at the quarter-over-quarter data, we added $32 million in net new ARR last quarter and $17 million this quarter. Is there anything noteworthy about that difference on a quarter-over-quarter basis?

Yes, that's a good point, Josh. The significant difference was the availability. We brought on a lot of AI capacity in Q2, which we had pent-up demand for. As a result, we experienced a notable bump in ARR last quarter. We were at 17 or 18 in the quarter prior, and then we increased to 30, but now we're back to 17. I'd consider last quarter more of an anomaly compared to this quarter. Clearly, we aim to add more incremental ARR moving forward, but most of the change was driven by a surge in AI capacity last quarter.

Your next question comes from the line of Pinjalim Bora from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks, guys. Just one question for me. The baseline growth outlook that you kind of shared entering 2025 seems pretty positive. It calls for an acceleration from the exit growth rate in this year. So I want to understand that a little bit more. Are you seeing some signals that projects will accelerate next year around the core business based on some customer conversations? Does that assume 100% MDR as you go into Q1? And how should we think about AI?

Pinjalim, I didn't hear the last part of that question. I heard the first part, but let me answer and then you can maybe come back with the AI question. We're seeing a lot of green shoots around kind of like, as you said, all the product traction that we're getting and some of our larger customers, even be willing to commit to longer-term multiyear contracts and commitment contracts, which isn't something that the company has done extensively in the past. But then the core NDR is improving steadily. We're not assuming that it gets to 100 by Q1. That's not implicit in that kind of comments that we made regarding next year. I mean we're going to work aggressively to get it to be 100, but we can deliver the growth rates that we talked about because we're effectively delivering that now, right, at 12% growth with an NDR that's only 97. And we expect both the managed hosting NDR and the core cloud NDR to improve as we head into next year. And we'll continue to get growth, very positive growth contributions from AI capabilities. We said earlier this year that we thought we'd get 3% of overall growth from AI, and we'll end a little bit ahead of that year. So that's also positive and encouraging as we think about what the baseline growth is heading into next year.

Understood. One quick follow-up. The multiyear commitments are definitely interesting. Are you leaning in on any way to drive those commitments? Is that largely coming from customers? Or are you putting in processes to kind of enable those discussions? Thank you so much.

Yes, I can take that. At this point, we are letting it happen organically. We don't have a clear go-to-market strategy and are not pushing it on our customers. The most important thing for us is to learn about the patterns, the technologies we need to develop, and the migration process. As we move into next year, we will look into packaging and productizing it, as well as expanding our third-party ecosystem to help facilitate some of these initiatives. There is still a lot of work to be done to scale it, but right now, our focus is on understanding what it takes to be successful.

And that is all the time we have for questions. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.