Thank you for standing by and welcome to the Enovix Corporation First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Currently, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, today's program will be recorded. And now I'd like to introduce your host for today's program, Robert Lahey, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Hello everyone. Welcome to Enovix Corporation's first quarter 2025 financial results conference call. With us today, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Raj Talluri; Chief Financial Officer Ryan Benton; Chief Accounting Officer Kristina Truong, and Chief Operating Officer Ajay Marathe. Raj and Ryan will provide an overview and then we'll take your questions. After the Q&A session, we'll conclude our call. Before we continue, let me kindly remind you that we released our first quarter 2025 shareholder letter after the market closed today. It's available on our website at ir.enovix.com. A replay of this video will be available later today on the investor relations page of our website. Please note that the shareholder letter, press release, and this conference call all contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and may differ materially from actual future events or results due to a variety of factors. For a discussion of those factors that could affect our future financial results and business, please refer to the disclosures in today's shareholder letter and our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All of our statements are made as of today, April 30, 2025. Based on information currently available to us. We can give no assurance that these statements will prove to be correct and we do not intend and undertake no duty to update these statements except as required by law. During this call, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures which are not prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. You can find a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measures to non-GAAP financial measures in our shareholder letter which is posted on the Investor Relations page of our website.

Okay, thank you Rob, and thanks to everyone for joining us for our format today. I'll start with a recap of our recent results and the recent milestones and then I'll turn it over to our new CFO Ryan Benton, here with me for a review of our financials and outlook. I’ll have a few closing comments and then we’ll take your questions. We feel great about our start to 2025. First, we are pleased to have Ryan Benton as our new CFO; Ryan brings deep financial leadership and experience and we're excited to have him on board. Second, we exceeded the midpoint of our Q1 revenue guidance, delivering $5.1 million in revenue and secured new defense bookings that support our growth into the second quarter. Third, we commenced the development of a custom smartphone cell with the exact dimensions required by our lead customer for their commercial product. Fourth, we made great strides in our operations. Fab2 in Malaysia accelerated progress towards mass production readiness. We secured ISO 9001 certification, completed the first formal customer audit, and made critical yield improvements. Fifth, in Korea, we made a strategic acquisition that expanded our manufacturing footprint. This acquisition will provide critical additional coating capacity needed in support of our Fab2 as well as our local defense customers. I'd like to briefly address recent developments in the global trade environment. Like many global companies, we're following these developments closely. Our assessment is that there's no material impact to our near-term outlook as most of our planned near-term sales are concentrated within Asia. We also see strategic opportunities though as some of our target customers have initiated efforts to diversify supply chains towards Malaysia and South Korea, where our factories are. Now for a few more details on the acquisition. On April 1, we completed the acquisition of additional manufacturing assets adjacent to our existing South Korea facilities. This includes equipment that will augment the coating needed for our Fab2 in Malaysia as we ramp, as well as additional production for our Korean military programs and other industrial applications that we are targeting. The facility also offers significant room for expansion, enhancing our strategic positioning as the global supply chains continue to evolve rapidly. In smartphones, we reached a critical inflection point towards launching our first product in the market. Last week we finalized an agreement with our lead customer on the electrochemistry we will deploy in the custom cell we're building for the upcoming product launch this year. We're now manufacturing custom cells for them to deliver qualification samples later this quarter to support integration and testing this summer. Our benchmarking confirms that we are meeting all key technical requirements and the customer feedback has been very positive and constructive. They have been a great partner to us. We appreciate the attention and resources that they as well as many of our other customers have dedicated to help us pull forward. Now we are also actively engaged with other smartphone OEMs to ensure rapid ramp once we establish in the market. This progress strengthens not only our smartphone initiative but also bolsters and accelerates our broader communications commercialization roadmap. Fab2 in Malaysia is well positioned for scale following ISO certification and our first completed customer audit. While we continue to make enhancements on yield and other operational metrics that will be critical once we are in mass production, we feel good about the state of our manufacturing readiness and our focus this quarter is weighted heavily towards supporting custom cell developments for our marquee customers to solidify the demand in 2026. Our focus on smartphones is strategic and deliberate. This market highly values energy density, especially given the growing demands of AI-enabled features and applications such as intelligent cameras and the proliferation of LLMs. The smartphone market represents the fastest path to fully utilizing Fab2 while maintaining the opportunity to price on value. Meeting the stringent requirements of smartphones facilitates other business opportunities in adjacent markets. In Q1, we delivered our first smart eyewear customer samples. We're also accelerating our expansion into handheld computer and scanner segments where we've been engaged with the market leader in retail and logistics. Recent tariff developments have created new opportunities in this segment prompting increased urgency and deeper collaboration from them. Finally, on the product front, I'm pleased to report that we recently completed benchmarking analysis of premium smartphone batteries launched in 2024 that indicates we hold a material lead in energy density and we expect it to grow considerably with future generations. Last year several conventional architecture battery manufacturers developed a technique called silicon doping where a small amount of silicon is added to graphite anodes to increase the battery capacity by a modest amount. Based on our firsthand experience and feedback from our smartphone customers, we believe that our competition will be capped from achieving meaningful energy density increments enhancements using these techniques within their current architecture due to swelling and other trade-offs they'll have to make. Our internal benchmarking analysis of premium smartphone batteries launched in 2024 indicates that Enovix's unique architecture with 100% active silicon anode will hold a material lead in energy density and we expect it to grow considerably with future generations. Our customers also validated that our architectural approach offers significant gains for the foreseeable future by leveraging the full potential of 100% active silicon anodes. With that, I'll turn it over to Ryan for the financials. Ryan?

Thanks Raj. To all the shareholders and employees watching and listening, it's my honor and pleasure to be here. I feel equally excited and fortunate to have joined Enovix at such a pivotal time as we look to expand our commercial operations and scale our next-generation battery technology. And I'd like to add a special thanks to Kristina, our CAO. She's helped make my transition seamless as I've only been on the job two weeks, I've asked her to join us on the call to ensure we can properly answer every question that arises. Before we get to the numbers, I want to give some color on what attracted me to the company, which is the opportunity to help drive the next stage of growth. Supported by an already strong foundation, a leading technology platform, deep strategic customer engagements, a talented and dedicated workforce, and a solid capital base that is well positioned to support our growth plans. I look forward to doing my part to help execute on our strategy and create long-term value. Now I'll provide a brief summary of the first quarter financials and an outlook into the second quarter. Further details are available on our website. For the first quarter of 2025, as Raj noted, we delivered revenue of $5.1 million, exceeding the midpoint of our guidance. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $22.2 million, near the high end of our guidance range of a loss of $21 million to $27 million. The sequential change from Q4 was driven in part by increased expenses to support the manufacturing scale up in Asia and a modest decline in gross profit. Non-GAAP net loss per share attributable to Enovix came in at a loss of $0.15 at the high end of our guidance range of $0.15 to $0.21. Capital expenditures in the quarter were $6.3 million and cash used in operations totaled $16.9 million. We ended the quarter with approximately $248 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. We believe our current capital position provides flexibility to support our operations well into 2026 while maintaining optionality to fund additional expansion capacity at Fab2. Now for our guidance. For the second quarter of 2025, we forecast revenue of $4.5 million to $6.5 million. Non-GAAP operating loss, which excludes certain items such as stock-based compensation in the range of $31 million to $37 million. Adjusted EBITDA loss, which further excludes certain items such as depreciation, amortization in the range of $23 million to $29 million, and finally non-GAAP net loss per share attributable to Enovix of $0.15 to $0.21. One note, going forward, we will no longer be providing guidance for GAAP EPS due to the difficulty to estimate or predict. However, we will continue to provide non-GAAP EPS guidance, and we have supplemented this with an additional measure non-GAAP operating income loss. Furthermore, in the interest of transparency, we published a new financial supplement document that compiles historical financial information into a single easy-to-access document. It's available on our website along with the shareholder letter. Over time, we plan to expand this resource by incorporating additional operating financial metrics and additional data. And finally, at the risk of being redundant, I want to say again how fortunate I feel to be part of the Enovix team. And with that, I'll turn it back over to Raj. Raj?

Yes. Thank you, Ryan. It's great to have you on board. With that. We can now go to questions. Operator?

Thank you. We will now begin the Q&A session. Please note that this call is being recorded. Before we go to live questions, we're going to read the two most highly voted questions submitted by shareholders ahead of this call, during the call registration. The first question is, can you share any updates on EX-3M in terms of energy density, release or sampling timelines?

Yes, thank you for the question. The question about EX-3M. Yes, we are very excited to have formalized the definition of EX-3M which is our next node and we expect to sample that by the end of this year. We've got the basic chemistry that we're going to use and the anodes and the cathodes are locked in terms and I think in the investor deck we give you some indication of relative to EX-1M and EX-2M where it is placed. The actual energy density will be, as I mentioned, a combination of cycle life and also fast charge and a few other parameters.

Thank you. And our second question is what is the status of the first major OEM cell phone development agreement announced May 1, 2024?

Yes, so as, as I mentioned before, we are working with two cell phone OEMs. One of them we've received the actual cell dimensions, which actually means this is a cell that's going to be used in the phone that's going to go to mass production at the end of this year. We retooled our factory to make that particular cell and Ajay, who's actually calling in from Malaysia and his team have been working pretty hard on that. We finalized electrochemistry that will go into that and we presented that data to our customer and they're very pleased with the progress and we will be making cells to that dimension in this quarter and giving it to them in the June timeframe. The customer that the second customer is also super engaged with us. They gave us a lot of requirements and feedback and that will be the next one that we'll address right after the cells go to the first customer.

Thank you. We will now go to the queue. Our first question comes from Jed Dorsheimer at William Blair. Thank you, Jed. Please unmute your line and ask your question.

Hi team, you have Mark Shooter on for Jed. I was wondering a question about customer conversations. How have they developed since the tariffs have been implemented on April 2, your top two Chinese customers, are they concerned about working with a U.S. company when they have so much internal battery supply? And on the flip side, are any U.S. government companies or consumer electronics companies more willing to engage rather than being like a fast follower?

Yes, thanks Mark. So Yes, no, we haven't seen any concerns from our current customers in, in China. Again, I think the tariff situation is evolving and it's dynamic and it changes week to week so far. I think they love the technology we're able to provide, the energy density we're able to bring in. And again, we make our batteries in Asia and we ship them to other factories in Asia so we don't see any near-term impact material interim impact on that front. We have seen more interest from many U.S. customers not just in smartphone but other areas in wanting to have a U.S. manufacturer who has got factories in Korea and in Malaysia. So that has kind of been some tailwinds for us. So we are now working on getting samples to them and so on.

Thanks Raj. I appreciate the color. As a follow up here I do the slide that you provided with the updated baseline cells. That's very helpful. And if I'm looking at the material set, the silicon carbon composites that OEMs have been using in 2024, that's what you're now comparing against. And if I were to the same materials that you'd be using or similar materials that you'd be using EX-2M. So, the direct compare, the way I'm looking at it is that the Enovix architecture allows more of that silicon, silicon carbon composite material in, in the cell and that can give you that 20% energy density boost. Am I thinking about that correctly?

Yes, exactly. In the market, people are primarily still utilizing graphite anodes, but as we noted in our letter, they have incorporated some silicon compounds, which provide a one-time improvement in energy density. With our recent acquisition, we produce graphite batteries and have also added a certain amount of silicon compound material, resulting in a modest increase in energy density. However, we found that as we increase the amount of this material, the batteries tend to swell beyond usable limits and face issues like cycle life and swelling. In contrast, our architecture allows us to use 100% active silicon material, meaning there is no graphite in our battery currently. We have effectively managed swelling due to our design, which contributes to energy density gains. We haven’t fully exploited the potential of the silicon architecture yet; that’s why we see certain benefits in 2M. Looking ahead to 3M and 4M, as we enhance our packaging efficiency and make various adjustments, including different separators and cathode voltages, we’re working on multiple changes. Having 100% active silicon anodes will support our roadmap for increased energy density while satisfying other requirements. This architecture is more effective in leveraging the advantages of silicon anodes.

That's great. Thank you, Raj.

Thank you so much. Our next question comes from Colin Rusch at Oppenheimer. Colin, please unmute your line and ask your question.

Thanks so much, guys. Raj, can you talk about the importance of the coding line that you're getting with the SolarEdge acquisition to facilitating not only your ramp, but also some of the learning cycles for some of those newer chemistries and being able to commercialize in an efficient way?

Yes, Yes, thank you Colin, for that question. So firstly, this has been a great acquisition for us and we talked about the fact that we got quite a large footprint of the factory and a new coating line and also capacity to produce more cells for a very reasonable price. So, it was very fortunate that we were able to do that. Look, I think what I've, what we realized as we start building our batteries now, it is very important that we control the coding and have enough of it. Because the cells that we talked about when I first started a couple of years ago to now you can see the cells that the customers want are getting larger and larger. Now we're talking over 7,000, and soon they'll probably be over 8,000, which means we need more and more coating capacity to support the ramp, which is why we felt it was a great opportunity for us to get that. The second one is we are now able to get these new materials. We already have existing coding in our Korea facility, but now we're able to get these new materials, quickly code them, and see the advantages, optimize the coating and figure out how to dice them on our laser dicing process to and get ahead in terms of building our roadmap. So it's a very key acquisition for us to actually optimize the coating and the dicing and the stacking that we do with now we have two coating lines on which we can do that. So it was very fortunate as we were able to get that.

Excellent. And then from a materials perspective, obviously there's an awful lot going on in terms of evolution of both anode and cathode materials. And I guess I'm curious about the number of relationships, number of companies you're able to work with in terms of some of those advanced materials as you look at evolving the platform and being able to kind of accelerate or at least, execute against some of the increased density that you guys are talking about here?

It's been great because now we have our own, we have these customers that we are working with in a smartphone. We've now gotten recommendations from our customers on different material supplies we should be looking at. And they have talked to the material suppliers and they're talking to us, which has been a really good thing because now we have customers suggesting different materials that we could use. There's various kinds of silicon anodes that we use. They all come with slightly different advantages in terms of energy density, in terms of cycle life, in terms of fast charge, in terms of storage, gassing, and so on. And also, now there's different cathode materials that are coming in that can actually run at higher voltages. So, what happens is when you drive the voltage of the cathode up, we are able to pack even more energy density. And if we kind of couple that with an anode, the silicon anode, that can hold a lot more lithium, that gives us the advantage that we're now able to make higher energy density batteries. So, it's been a very good thing for us. And the other thing is, I've mentioned this before, maybe not to the clarity I needed to is that we are material agnostic in the sense that the same laser dicing and stacking and formation machines we have can work with all these different kinds of materials as we optimize them. In the sense that we don't have to buy brand new machines as we change the material stack, so the cost of the machines we've bought gets amortized over different material stocks. So, as we increase energy density, we can use the same factories but change the materials and get that benefit. So, it's been a very interesting journey to see that and I actually think there'll be a lot more materials coming in, even separators. We're signing much better separators now coming in and so on.

Excellent. Appreciate it, guys.

Our next question comes from George Gianarikas from Canaccord. George, please unmute your line and ask your question.

Hi everyone. Thank you for taking my questions. Maybe to start, can you share any of the financial metrics around your recent acquisition in South Korea? The revenue capacity, revenue expectations, margin profile, maybe a little bit more detail on the purchase price? Thank you.

Yes, I mean maybe I'll pass it over to Kristina or Ryan to comment on that. But essentially what we got was it was an asset acquisition. So, we essentially acquired the assets in the factory. I think 330 square feet of space. We had like 70,000 there before. So this is significantly added to that. And this has the capacity now to make our cells that we are selling to military and also cells that can go into other markets. But maybe Kristina, you want to comment more on it.

I mean, I'll just jump in it. The structure is an asset purchase. So, it was a $10 million purchase price and we got facility and equipment.

Yes, thank you. And maybe as a follow up, you mentioned in the press release some momentum, some sampling momentum with additional end markets. I think a handheld computer was one of them. Can you, I know that a lot has to go well for this to happen in 2026, but to the extent you could sort of think about a revenue profile of the firm in 2026, maybe into 2027. How many different end markets do you expect to serve at that time? Will you be strictly smartphone or do you maybe have more of a defense footing? Will you entertain niche markets like handheld computers or maybe some smartphones? I'm just kind of curious as to break down that revenue profile. Thank you.

Yes, so let me talk about the strategy before I talk about the revenue profile. So, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, the most challenging battery to make is a smartphone battery because it has high demands on energy density. It has high demands on how fast you can charge. It has high demands on cycle life, how long it has to go. There's high demands on storage and different operating temperatures because phones get used in the cold and hot and so on. We always felt when we target a market like that, a lot of the other markets would be much easier to address. Very similar to when I was at Qualcomm, we used to make Snapdragon that went into all the smartphones. We were then able to sell Snapdragon processors when I was running that division into handheld computers, into thermostats, into vacuum cleaners, and many, many different opportunities. So a similar strategy here. We're aiming at the cell phone market and we're getting requirements from customers to build this really tough battery and our customers are really helping us with those requirements as we build out that battery, we're now finding that the requirements in the other markets are actually less stringent and we can address those much easier. So handheld computers is one such market. Scanners is one such market. AR VR happened to be a market that we got into. We also want to be really careful not to go into too many markets because each of these markets needs a slightly different custom cell. The shape of the cell. Our factory in Malaysia right now, as I mentioned, we're making the smartphone battery for our lead customer, another smartphone customer right behind that that we've given samples and they like the results and know that will become next. Meanwhile, we are supporting two AR glass customers with two different size cells. We are also supporting this IoT customer that I mentioned last time. And then we have the defense product that we are building. So the factory is pretty busy and full with all the custom cells we're making. As new opportunities come in, we are looking at opportunities and looking at them not only in terms of our technology being able to meet them, but the financial returns on making a custom cell. Is opportunity large enough? Is the margin profile there? Are they big enough and so on. And that is what is really how we are making this. So really excited by how it's going and we will only see more and more opportunities for this type of technology, and then we just have to be careful in picking the right ones as an early-stage company. So we ramp with high volume, most profitable ones first.

Thank you.

Thank you so much. Our next question comes from Ananda Baruah from Loop Capital. Ananda, please unmute your line and ask your question. Thank you.

Yes, thanks guys for taking the question. Really appreciate it. Good to see you guys. Ryan, good to meet you. I guess on a one way screen here. Yes, definitely, I guess. Yes, just Raj, the first question is, I think you had mentioned earlier in the year and this may be what you were referring to with the first OEM sending cells to them this quarter. Is it this June through August time frame still the work being done in there, that will then put you guys in a position to begin to understand, what the programs with them in '26 could look like, which could then also inform the volumes of '26? Is that still a crucial, crucial work getting done in that June to August timeframe?

Exactly, exactly. And it's on track. As I mentioned earlier on here, we are on track and we expect to get samples out in June. One thing I will say is that we do have meetings with them every week. It's not like we said something and we'll go back in June and talk to them. So we've shown them the results, we've given them early cells of where we are, we talk to them about the modifications we are making to the electrochemistry to meet the different requirements and they give us some feedback back. So it's a really close collaboration with both the cell phone OEMs. And so in that sense, we have a lot of visibility into how things are going. So when we do meet all the requirements, we feel more confident again ultimately we have to put all of this together in this one particular, in the custom cell that they need and they have retested in their phone and that's when the testing will be complete. And that should happen, from June to August timeframe.

Are you guys? Got it. And then should we, should we develop an expectation that you guys can begin to, in the fall share your initial view on program inclusion, SKU inclusion and I guess at least whenever SKU inclusion like sort of volume inclusion or at least volume TAM, given the SKU inclusion, will there be any of that provided in the fall?

I mean, look, ultimately, we can share as much as our customers allow us to share. Because look, as a component supplier, usually when you bring new technology and customers are very careful about saying what they're using and when, but as and when we get permission from them to share, we'll be happy to share that. Right?

Okay, that's great. And then I guess just as a quick follow up and I can see the floor here. The silicon doping process technique that you had talked about. Like how much silicon on the anode are they getting to, like, sort of at max that you guys have seen?

The max we've seen in the market is in the 10% range. So it's very small.

Got it.

And we are using 100% of the material, by the way, just to contrast.

Yes. Hey, guys, thanks for taking the questions and my congrats to Ryan on the new position. Wanted to follow up on George's earlier question. Just around the revenue capacity following the acquisition of the SolarEdge facility. Sounded like 4x the square footage of the '23 acquisition. Is this an acquisition that maybe takes the route jade potential revenue from sort of $20 million - $30 million to $100 million plus? I understand that some of the electrodes will be used in batteries, but can you help us maybe quantify the potential revenue capacity or production capacity expansion with the newly expanded site?

Yes, I mean, look, I think it's a little too early to exactly comment on that. We do have the space, we have the equipment, but we will capitalize and expand that as a demand for those products materializes. We do see now a lot of requests coming in, particularly with the whole tariff scenario that people would like products from, from Korea. And we see that, like, every day. But we have to be careful to pick the right ones. And we are in the middle of that. It's probably a little early to comment on that, but I can tell you we're, we think it's a great opportunity that we got these assets.

Yes, I will chime in. It's again, I think it is a little too early to quote a number, but it certainly does dramatically increase our capacity. And as Raj said in the prepared remarks, it's really about two things. One is ensuring that surety of supply in terms of supporting Fab2 from a coating perspective. And we're seeing just this tremendous kind of uptick in terms of opportunities as it relates to the local defense opportunities. So without quoting a number, it certainly, it's a tremendous opportunist deal. And I give Raj and the team credit for executing on that before I get here. But as you can see, it's in the same complex. So, it clearly is kind of part of the strategic plan. So, kudos to them for getting it done.

Sure, I hope you can, you guys can hear me, okay? Calling in from Malaysia. No, Fab2 is progressing really well. We are making a lot of good progress on all fronts. HVM line right now is configured for the custom cell as Raj alluded to, the custom cell for the first customer. And I'm talking about changing over the tooling, getting the first pipe cleaners through and starting the production for the cells that we are going to turn it over or hand over to the first customer. So that's all going really well. Yields are progressing. We have made a lot of good improvements on yields and definitely stand by our original statement that we made that we will be up on the yields as the ramp production ramps really begins to world-class levels. So that's all going on track. Yes. And simultaneously we are also working on other form factors for AR VR as Raj also talked about. And the UPH, I would say is like I said, the front end of the line, which is really the form, the laser dicing form. We are making sure that that process comes along well. The line is itself is bought off at 1350 UPH as you know, for SAT. So, everything seems to be on track and you know, that's what I can share right now from here, from Malaysia.

I mean, one other comment I'll make, sorry Derek, is that right now we are making many, many products in the same Fab. So we have small cells, we have, you know, three different kinds of small cells. We have an army cell, we have a big cell that we're making in HBM line. So right now, we are really focused on executing on all these programs to get samples to our customers. Nothing we've seen here makes us concerned that when we're at high-volume production, we can't get to the yields that we wanted to. But we don't need to run them at that speed right now because mostly we're making samples.

Yes, hi, good afternoon, and thanks for taking the questions and also thanks for the details on the competition. I guess for completeness on these sort of leading-edge competitive cells, are these in the 800-watt hour per liter range? We've also been getting sort of questions on cycle life and I know you're looking at achieving a thousand. I'm seeing some competitors or maybe even closer to 1500. But I guess just to benchmark where the current leading edge is. How do they compare in terms of cycle life and also maybe some of these other factors you talked about things like temperature, window, fast charging and so forth.

Yes, I get this question from this call usually and the nuance of this is kind of very important. So for example, when you talk about cycle life, a phone discharges a battery at different rates. Right? So for example, the phone is on standby, it's probably drawing at 0.1 C or 0.2 C charge, but when you run a full game, it goes at like 0.7 C charge maybe. So, cycle life varies based on how you charge. So it's hard to quote cycle life as one number. So what most customers do is they have a profile of how their phones actually operate and they come up with a metric on a charge profile and a discharge profile and they benchmark the cycle life based on that. So what I mean by that is you could take a particular phone and say this battery is 1000 cycles. You can take another phone, the exact same battery may only run to like 600, 700 cycles. Depends on how they use. Right. So it's not a simple one number metric, it's a very customer-dependent metric. But what I can tell you is that we feel our battery is extremely competitive and that's why the trade-off of cycle life versus energy density versus fast charge is what our customers feel pretty good about where we are. And we have continued to improve on all three of them as we move forward. So, it's hard to answer yours with one number because it's not very meaningful. Depends on phone to phone, customer to customer.

Okay, but what about at least in terms of energy density, just so we understand where you're coming from?

Yes, clearly. I mean we are in that, we're in that. They're all in the 800 plus range. So absolutely, we're extremely competitive with all of them.

Okay. And then as a follow up, wanted to talk about your defense pipeline. You've been talking about it a bit more, even with the, the older route acquisition. But are there additional orders forming in 2025? And it looks like your additional capacity can support that defense opportunities. Can you break down the interest you have by geography, I presume you, you could be getting more in the U.S. for the reasons you said. But maybe just around the opportunity itself, I think maybe two years back, the U.S. military alone was around $350 million. So maybe updated thoughts on your opportunity?

Yes, we are getting a lot of interest because of the, as you can imagine, the entire tariff scenario. But again, we've started shipping samples to the customer. So we've got sample purchase orders. And this takes time because once they get a sample purchase orders, they tested it, they like the performance, then they all want a custom cell that is very specific to that. And so the orders will take some time after the qualification period. That's just the nature of batteries. But we are getting more and more requests for samples and we are shipping them now. And like you mentioned, the total opportunity is pretty big. So we are fairly optimistic that once we get these samples to pass qual, it'll be meaningful for us in time.

Thanks for taking my question. I'm just curious, on the SolarEdge acquisition, is there anything running through the factory at this point or was it idle and sort of what is it going to take to get it up and running and how long?

Yes, it's making cells for defense applications and it is also making some cells for ESS applications. So, it's a working factory. And we were able to acquire some people that are running the factory also along with it. And there's a coating line that also we got. So it's a working factory and we're just augmenting to our capacity.

Right. And then could you just walk through sort of the milestones in front of you in terms of getting to out of Fab2, shipping production to customers, what milestones do you have to hit for your lead customer for example, where are you in that, you know, milestones?

Yes, sure. So, there's multiple customers we're supporting from Fab2. Right? As I mentioned, there's two AR VR customers, there's an IoT customer we are supporting which actually there's a large volume opportunity and then there's defense products that we are making there and the smartphone which is a big cell that we're making in HVM line. So, we have sent samples to one of the AR VR customers last quarter and we are just getting ready to send to the second one. And we of course given samples to multiple smartphone customers. All our energy is now focused on making this one particular large cell, 7,000 plus milliamp per cell to our lead smartphone customer. And those samples, the milestone you should look for is us delivering those samples in June timeframe. And the next milestone is, passing their qualification inside their phone because they do a lot of tests. They do drop tests, they do short circuit tests, they do energy density tests, they do cycle life test, they do storage gassing tests. All that stuff goes through between June and August timeframe and then we'll get some feedback on if that all goes well. Then when we get the purchase order for the next one. On the AR VR glasses, we've actually sent the samples and the customers have put them in the glasses now and we can see now how that's going and they're giving us feedback on that. So, milestones from Fab2 are basically delivering customer samples, getting the feedback from the customers, optimizing it, getting ready for full production. That's what you'll see us report on through the year.

Hey, Yes, thanks guys for taking the follow up. Hey Raj, can you remind us where PC quals again fall in in the timeline? And, and like, I guess, Yes, I'll start there. When do PC quals fall in the timeline? I'll probably have to follow up on that. Thanks.

Yes, you know, PCs take even longer than smartphones to call. You know, ironically it's just a, just a longer call process. But you know, like I said, we are just so busy with our current factory so full with all these products. We feel we will, once we get the smartphone qualification underway, we should be able to give that cells, that size cells with that chemistry to the PC OEMs. And like I said, the smartphones are the toughest batteries to make. So to me, once we make that, there are some nuances to the PC ones about temperature and cycle life and stuff like that. We can adjust on top of that with some of the electrochemistry, but those are the cells we'll start with, but they'll take another 18 months from there. PC quals just take longer.

I got it. And Raj, when you say take the smartphone quals and sort of the jump-off spot the launchpad for the PC quals, would that be these first two OEM calls that you're talking about? And so is it at some point, I'm not trying to pin you down, but just to visualize it, some point by let's say mid '26, you can start that 18 month clock. Is that a good way to think about it or is it. Sorry about the…

There's multiple stages of call. Right? So, our plan is these samples that we're giving to our smartphone customers, you know, there'll be a variation of that. We'll give it to the PC customers, they will start testing it, they'll give us some feedback. And just like it happened on smartphones, they'll give us some nuances that they like. They store it a little longer, they store it a slightly higher temperature. They want cycle life to be little more or less, the fast charge may be not that much of a requirement for them because these are plugged on. So, we'll need to make some adjustments to the electrolytes and so on and then give them the right cell and then they start the call. That's just how it moves, right? Very similar to how it has moved on the smartphone side.

Yes, hey guys, thanks for the time. I just wanted to jump in with one on the EV opportunity. In the release you comment on the major charge time improvement by a leading battery supplier in Asia, validating your cooling architecture. Can you just dig in a bit there and provide a little more color?

Yes, we looked at that announcement and what we find is that it's just another proof point that yes, you can charge them really fast, but if you look at that announcement, the temperature does go up fast and ED is at stake. So materials are more expensive to do such a thing. So better if we did the similar stuff in our architecture. Where is conventional architecture, we can get to similar rates but provide the advantages of not swelling and provide the advantages of not getting so hot. So just another proof point of the value of our technology and even in the EV space and we are making progress on that front. As you guys know, we have two EV customers that are working with us and we are in the middle of, making samples for that also from our Malaysia factory. Now we have a large dry room there that we build this now and so on. So stay tuned for updates on that. It just validates our proof, our, our argument that, fast charge and not getting hot are the key requirements in the EV space. And that's what we focused on.

Hi Tim, it's Mark again, but thank you for the follow up for the Smart Glasses market. In the charts that you provided, you cite a larger performance benefit than even in the smartphones. I'm wondering if you can give us some info of what about the Smart Glasses application gives a Enovix architecture even more performance advantage. And if that is the case, are there any additional margin benefits that could come from that application?

Yes, absolutely. So, there's a kind of a fundamental difference between how a smart glass works with a smartphone works. What I mean by that is when the smart glass is creating an augmented reality scenario, for example, you're visualizing something. What has to happen is the processor has to run full blast, and the displays, which is basically these new displays that have come up have to run, and then the cameras are all working because they have to figure out where you're looking. Because you have to do what is called 6-DOF, you got to calculate the 6 degrees of freedom of where you're looking to create that projection. So, in other words, the memories, the process displays are all running full blast to create that user experience that draws tremendous amount of battery, even a lot more than what will happen in a smartphone. Because in a smartphone, typically they're all not running at the same time full blast. Right? I mean, like most of the phones on standby most of the time, every so often it comes on, you do a video watching or something like that, but you're not blasting graphics, GPU, video camera, audio, everything at one time. So the draw is much higher. And the other interesting thing is the space of the battery in a smart glass is much smaller because it has to fit just in the temple of the glasses are in the back where it is. So, the amount of energy density you have to pack in a small volume is much higher and the discharge rate is higher. Both of those we can do really well in our architecture. That's the reason we're getting all this, you know, excitement from our customers for this product. And that's why we have two customers that have already prepaid for the, for the volumes. So it's just a market that takes advantage of our technology much better. And we see a few other markets like that. So typically, when there's space constraint, when there's a display, when there's a tremendous amount of draw due to either AI or processor or memory running fast, that's the market where we believe we have most advantage. And that does translate into ASP premiums, and we are seeing that in both those markets.

Thanks for taking my question. Curious if you could provide any update on the pricing dynamics you're seeing in the market, whether or not they continue to support this, this margin target that you laid out a couple of years ago. Thank you.

Yes, absolutely. I mean, we've recorded budget repricings to our smartphone customers, and I think clearly they see the value and it's been really good. We closed the pricing on the two AR glasses that I talked about and those have been clearly validated. The ASP premiums we can combine when we provide value. I mean, like I said before. Right. I think the number one thing you gotta remember is that in smartphones, in AR VR glasses, in all these markets, the price of the battery as a percentage of the BoM is very small. Right. So, if you look at a smartphone, eleven hundred thousand dollars premium tier smartphone, six hundred dollars bill of materials, the battery is between ten to fifteen dollars. Right. So there's still a long ways to go in terms of percentage of the BoM. But in terms of the value it provides, it unlocks the value of the processor, it unlocks the value of the display, it unlocks the value of the cameras, it unlocks the value of the memory. And if you look at smart purchases, the number one and number two are like, battery life and, and camera. So, when you provide value, there's clearly ASP premium and we are seeing that being validated. So we are quite comfortable with that.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. With that, I'd like to turn it back over to Dr. Raj Talluri for closing remarks. Thank you.

Yes, thank you again for joining us today. We are very encouraged by the progress we've made and we are even more excited by what's ahead. We remain focused on execution, deepening our customer relationships, unlocking the full potential of our technology and operations. Now, we really appreciate your continued support and we look forward to updating you again next quarter. Thank you.