Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Abby and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Essent Group Limited third quarter earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during that time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one a second time. Thank you. And I would now like to turn the conference over to Phil Stefano with Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, Abby. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our call. Joining me today are Mark Casale, Chairman and CEO, and David Weinstock, Chief Financial Officer. Also on hand for the Q&A portion of the call is Chris Curran, President of Essence Guarantee. Our press release, which contains Essen's financial results for the third quarter of 2025, was issued earlier today and is available on our website at essengroup.com. Prior to getting started, I would like to remind participants that today's discussions are being recorded and will include the use of forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please review the cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements in today's press release, the risk factors included in our Form 10-K followed with the SEC on February 19, 2025, and any other reports and registration statements followed with the SEC, which are also available on our website. Now let me turn the call over to Mark.

Thanks, Phil, and good morning, everyone. Earlier today, we released our third quarter 2025 financial results. Our performance this quarter again underscores the resilience of our business as we continue to benefit from favorable credit trends and the interest rate environment, which remains a tailwind for both persistency and investment income. These results reflect the strength of our buy, manage, and distribute operating model, which we believe is well-suited to navigate a range of macroeconomic scenarios and generate high-quality earnings. For the third quarter of 2025, we reported net income of $164 million compared to $176 million a year ago. On a diluted per share basis, we earned $1.67 for the third quarter compared to $1.65 a year ago. On an annualized basis, our year-to-date return on equity was 13% through the third quarter. As of September 30th, our U.S. mortgage insurance in force was $249 billion, a 2% increase versus a year ago. Our 12-month persistency on September 30th was 86%, flat from last quarter, while nearly half of our in-force portfolio has a note rate of 5% or lower. We continue to expect that the current level of mortgage rates will support elevated persistency in the near term. the credit quality of our insurance and force remains strong the weighted average fico of 746 and a weighted average original ltv of 93 our portfolio default rate increased modestly from the second quarter of 2025 reflecting the normal seasonality of the mortgage insurance business meanwhile we continue to believe that the substantial home equity embedded in our in our enforced book should mitigate ultimate claims our consolidated cash and investments as of September 30, it totals $6.6 billion, with an annualized investment yield in the third quarter of 3.9%. Our new money yield in the third quarter was nearly 5%, holding largely stable over the past several quarters. We continue to operate from a position of strength with $5.7 billion in gap equity, access to $1.4 billion in excess of loss reinsurance, and $1 billion in cash and investments at the holding companies. With a 12-month operating cash flow of $854 million through the third quarter, our franchise remains well-positioned from an earnings, cash flow, and balance sheet perspective. We remain committed to a prudent and conservative capital strategy that allows us to maintain a strong balance sheet to navigate market volatility while preserving the flexibility to invest in strategic growth. Thanks to our robust capital position and strength in earnings, we are well positioned to actively return capital to shareholders in a value-of-creative fashion. With that in mind, year-to-date through October 31st, we have repurchased nearly 9 million shares for over $500 million. At the same time, I am pleased to announce that our board has approved a common dividend of 31 cents for the fourth quarter of 2025 and a new $500 million share repurchase authorization that runs through year-end 2027. Now let me turn the call over to Dave.

Thanks Mark and good morning everyone. Let me review our results for the quarter in a little more detail. For the third quarter, we earned $1.67 per diluted share compared to $1.93 last quarter and $1.65 in the third quarter a year ago. My comments today are going to focus primarily on the results of our mortgage insurance segment, which aggregates our U.S. mortgage insurance business and the GSE and other mortgage reinsurance business at our subsidiary has agreed. There's additional information on corporate and other results in Exhibit O of the financial supplement. Our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio ended the third quarter with insurance in force of $248.8 billion, an increase of $2 billion from June 30th, and an increase of $5.8 billion, or 2.4%, compared to $243 billion at September 30th, 2024. 4. Persistency at September 30, 2025 was 86% compared to 85.8% at June 30, 2025. Mortgage insurance net premium earned for the third quarter of 2025 was $232 million and included $15.9 million of premiums earned by Ebsen Re on our third-party business. The average base premium rate for the U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio for the third quarter was 41 basis points, consistent with last quarter. And the average net premium rate was 35 basis points, down one basis point from last quarter. Our U.S. mortgage insurance provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses was $44.2 million in the third quarter of 2025, compared to $15.4 million in the second quarter of 2025, and $29.8 million in the third quarter a year ago. At September 30th, the default rate on the U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio was 2.29%, up 17 basis points from 2.12% at June 30th, 2025. Mortgage insurance operating expenses in the third quarter were $34.2 million, and the expense ratio was 14.8%, compared to $36.3 million and 15.5% last quarter. At September 30th, ESSEN Guarantees' PMIR sufficiency ratio was strong at 177%, with $1.6 billion in excess available assets. Consolidated net investment income and our average cash investment portfolio balance in the third quarter were largely unchanged from last quarter due to our share repurchase activity. in the third quarter of 2025 we increased our 2025 estimated annual effective tax rate excluding the impact of discrete items from 15.4 percent to 16.2 percent this change was primarily due to withholding taxes incurred on a third quarter dividend from snus holdings to its offshore parent company as mark noted our holding company liquidity remains strong and includes 500 million dollars of undrawn revolver capacity under our committed credit facility. At September 30th, we had 500 million dollars of senior notes, senior unsecured notes outstanding and our debt to capital ratio was 8%. During the third quarter, Essence Guarantee paid a dividend of 85 million dollars to its U.S. holding company. As of October 1st, Essence Guarantee can pay additional ordinary dividends of 281 million dollars in 2025. At quarter end, Essen Guarantees' statutory capital was $3.7 billion, with a risk-to-capital ratio of 8.9 to 1. Note that statutory capital includes $2.6 billion of contingency reserves at September 30th. During the third quarter, Essen Re paid a dividend of $120 million to Essen Group. Also in the third quarter, Essen Group paid cash dividends totaling $30.1 million to shareholders, and we've repurchased 2.1 million shares for $122 million. In October 2025, we've repurchased 837,000 shares for $50 million. Now let me turn the call back over to Mark.

Thanks, Dave. In closing, we are pleased with our third quarter financial results as Essent continues to generate high-quality earnings while our balance sheet and liquidity remain strong. Our performance this quarter reflects the strength and resilience of our franchise while ESSEN remains well-positioned to navigate a range of scenarios given the strength of our buy, manage, and distribute operating model. Our strong earnings and cash flow continue to provide us with an opportunity to balance investing in our business and returning capital. We believe this approach is in the best long-term interest of our stakeholders and that ESSEN is well-positioned to deliver attractive returns for our shareholders. Now let's get to your questions. Operator?

Thank you. And we'll now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one a second time. If you're called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your questions. Again, it is star one if you would like to ask a question. And our first question comes from the line of Terry Ma with Barclays. Your line is open.

Hey, thank you. Good morning. Just wanted to start off with credit. New notices were a bit lower than what we had, but the provision on those notices were higher. So any color on kind of just the makeup from a vintage or even geography perspective this quarter?

Yeah. Hey, Terry, it's Mark. I wouldn't say there's nothing really to read out in terms of geography or trends. The one thing for you guys as analysts, we pointed this out a few quarters ago, is just our average loan size continues to increase. I mean, ever since, you know, for years it was like $230,000, and when the GSE started raising their limits, and it really kind of picked up post-COVID. So our average loan size, if you just look through the stat supplement for the insurance, it's close to $300,000. So, again, larger loans, when they come through, you know, kind of into default, it's going to be a larger provision. So, I wouldn't read any more into it than that. I think, you know, again, the default rate is relatively flattish. And I think, you know, from a credit position, there's nothing we're really seeing that concerns us at the current time.

Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe just to follow up on the claims amount. you know, the number was higher and also the severity. So like anything to call out there, like anything idiosyncratic, or is there more of a trend? Thank you.

Hey, Terry, it's Dave Weinstock. Yeah, there's really nothing to point out there. You know, a lot of that's going to depend on when we get documents in and, you know, when the claims are fully adjudicated and ready for payment. And so you're going to see fluctuations based on, you know, what the underlying claims are. But at the end of the day, there are not a lot of claims there. And the biggest takeaway really is that the severity can be well below what we're reserving at. So we're getting favorable results there.

Okay. Got it. Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Bose George with KBW. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Good morning.

First, just on the seeded premiums with kind of the high end of the range, is that a good level going forward or does that just bounce around depending on the timing of you know when you're doing the reinsurance transactions yeah hey boz it's dave weinstock yeah it's going to bounce around a little bit based on default and provision activity so you know it's seasonal and i think you saw you know the seeded premium being a little bit lower in the first half of the year similar to where you see our defaults you know being more favorable and lower and you know this is a seasonal second half of the years we've talked about you know we definitely you generally see an uptick and so you're going to see a little bit of an uptick in the seeded premium.

And also keep in mind, Bose, we raised the quarter share this year to 25%. So that is going to create a little bit more volatility. At the end of the day, it comes through the wash, right? So in terms of the mix between the provision and expenses and seeding commission, but yeah, it'll bounce around a little bit more. So I'd be conscious of that in your models.

Okay, great. And then just in terms of the tax rate, you know, what drove the higher tax rate? And then just can you remind us just, you know, based on how much you're seeding, et cetera, where you think the tax rate is going to be over the next, say, 12 months?

Yeah, I mean, I think that, you know, Dave alluded to it in the script. A lot of it is just a little bit of the tax friction moving from kind of guarantee to U.S. up to Bermuda and out to shareholders. So I think 16 and maybe a touch higher going forward, I would think through that with your models, I'd be relatively conservative of those. And it really gets back to the fact that we're just distributing a lot more capital back to shareholders. And that's kind of a little bit of a signal that we don't really see it changing much, given where, you know, sitting with still a billion dollars of cash at the hold co and kind of where the stock is right around bookish value. And we pointed this out last time in our investor deck, which will come out kind of post post earnings with the embedded value of the business, we believe, is much higher than kind of where we are today. Again, it's a simple math. It's nothing revolutionary. We have $6 billion of cash, $6 billion of equity. We trade right around $6 billion. It doesn't really give credit for the $250 billion of insurance and force that we have. It's a significant embedded value. I think we've proven that over the past 10 years in terms of the cash flow. And just look again, we generated $854 million of cash flow over the last 12 months. So based on that and where we're just given the capital position, and we're still generating unit economics kind of in that 12-ish to 14-ish range, we think it's the best value. So I think we'll continue to do that. But there again, just getting the cash out creates a little friction. But I think from a shareholder perspective, yeah, we'll pay a couple extra bucks on the tax rate. But I think from, you know, lowering the share account and kind of delivering value to shareholders, it's a little bit of a no-brainer.

Okay, great. Thanks.

And our next question comes from the line of Rick Shane with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question this morning. I'm looking at Exhibit K, and one trend that is pretty consistent is the increase in severity rates. And that makes sense, given slowing home price appreciation and vintage mix. It was 78% this quarter. I'm curious, long-term, where you think that could go? Are we sort of asymptotically approaching the limit there, or should we expect that to continue to rise?

Yeah, I mean, I don't know if you would expect it to rise. Again, the provision's at 100, Rick, just so you know. The embedded HPA in the book is still kind of 75-ish, so I mean, in terms of mark-to-market LTV. So some of it's just timing, right? If somebody from the later vintages, kind of call 23 or 24, goes into default. There's going to be a higher provision, or if they go into claim, we're going to pay a higher claim there because they have less embedded value. But taking a step back just at the portfolio level, we're not going to get too fussed about it, Rick. I mean, again, you're talking about a relatively low losses. And remember, and we point this out every quarter to just what the real risk is in our business, right? I take from my seat, Rick, you know, we own that first loss position, right? So call it, you know, two to three claims out of 100. We hedge out from above that kind of into that six, seven range, and we reattach above that. That's the risk in the business, right? We are a specialty insurance type business, almost like a cat, where our catastrophe is a severe macroeconomic recession. And that's when we hold capital. When we think about PMIRs, we think about the different stress tests that we run, whether it's Moody's constant severity, S4, the GFC, that's when we come in and think about it week to week or month to month. We're focused really on making sure we're fine there, and we clearly are, given the amount of capital that we're using to repurchase shares. So getting back to this, again, we clearly look at it. I think we're conservative in how we provision just from a severity standpoint, because I think that's, you know, the severity is an actuarial, I mean, the provisions and actuarial based model. So we don't really we don't really mess with it quarter to quarter, even year to year that much. So, again, I'm just trying to from a big picture standpoint. Sure, you're going to try to point out trends, you know, and Terry pointed out the trends around the new notices. Those are all good. you guys have to do that for your models. But I think taking a step back, the biggest metric for the quarter, Rick, is we produced $854 million of cash over the last 12 months. So again, not trying to get to a too high level, but I think it's important to put context around some of these numbers.

No, look, it's a fair point, Mark. Given how low losses have been for so long, a modest dollar movement looks like a larger, looks like a significant percentage movement. And I think we're all sensitive to that and trying to sort of, I think, understand what the normalized returns on the business are. And do you think we are approaching those levels? And look, you've enjoyed an extraordinary period for a long time for a whole host of reasons that we've all talked about. But as the business normalizes and sort of reverts to the return levels that the two of us spoke about a decade ago, do you think we're getting there now?

Now, it's a good question. And Rick, we've been studying this. So let's go back in time, Let's start with 1990, which is really the beginning of the modern-day Fannie and Freddie. And let's just go with the last 35 years. If you take away the GFC, which it's hard to do, but just stick with me here for a second, the average loss rate on Fannie and Freddie-backed loans is less than 1%. That, I believe, is actually – so it's not this, oh, my goodness, we have such a good run. When is it going to end? this is it. This is the business. It's a great business. You're talking about, and again, and some of the things that caused the great financial crisis, because you don't want to ignore that. And the reason we like the business coming out of the crisis, you had the Dodd-Frank qualified mortgage rule. So 35% of the loans that were done during the crisis, they no longer qualify. They literally got the riffraff out of the industry. So that is now either going, it's going to either FHA or it's going to kind of non-QM or they're not being originated, which is the most case, a lot of those borrowers are ending up in single family rental. It's a great outcome for them, right? So then all of a sudden, then you add in the increased, I would say, sophistication of DU and LP at the GSEs. Their quality control has gotten significantly better, I mean, over the last 15 years. So all of a sudden, the credit guardrails around our business are exceptional, and we don't see it changing. Unless there's something happens with GSE reform, and clearly we look at that, but as long as the market is where it is today, it's a very narrow fairway, and so we don't see really credit changing that much. It's hard. I mean, actually, our credit for this, the last two quarters, Rick, was the best FICO we've had since we started the company, and part of that's affordability. Part of it is affordability, like just folks are having a harder time qualifying, but the credit quality in this business is exceptional. And just from a public policy standpoint, 65% of our borrowers are first-time homeowners. I mean, I was with a young guy last week who just got mortgage insurance through one of our clients. He's paying like $65 a month. He put 10% down. I mean, you can't beat it. It's a great value to the customer, which you always want to have, right? The borrowers are ultimate customer. And then I think the math for us. So I would say from, and some of our longer term investors kind of know this clearly. I would stop and one of our other analysts has always asked me, Mark, is this as good as it gets? Guys, it's been good for a long time. I mean, and I don't really, again, there's going to be some volatility, you know, quarter to quarter or year to year. You know, look, if unemployment goes up, we're probably going to pay some losses. But remember, we're kind of capped. We're kind of capped until we hit, you know, until we go through that mess piece. So it's really, really well boxed. Hence our confidence in, you know, paying the quarterly dividend. And right now in terms of where we are returning capital to shareholders, it's been quite a shift the past 12 months. But part of it was we've just continued to accumulate cash. And we've had this retain and invest mentality. We just haven't invested in anything. And so we look at it now and say that the best investment we can make is in the company. And if we keep this pace up, Rick, you know, every time you repurchase shares, you know, our long-term owners, which include the senior management team, we own a little bit more of the company. And if I'm going to own a business, this is my favorite business. So, we'll see. So, sorry for the long-winded answer, but I want to, again, try to give, you know, some of the investors on the phone some context.

No, Mark, look, I appreciate it.

And I suspect there are some folks who are listening to this call imagining the two of us on rocking chairs debating the stuff and uh that's a that's okay too i appreciate the answer and as a reminder it is star one if you would like to ask a question and our next question comes from the line of mihir batia with bank of america your line is open hi mark uh good morning thank you for taking my question um i actually want to follow up on uh rick's uh last question there about just in you about the guardrails around uh underwriting currently i think there was news yesterday about fanny removing the minimum credit score requirements there's been some noises out of washington about you know trying to do play a more active role in housing or lower increase housing demand if you will and i was just wondering from your seed, are you seeing any signs of that? Are originators trying to get more stuff under it, get more stuff approved that maybe wouldn't have been, they wouldn't have tried a couple of years ago? Just wondering what that looks like. Thank you.

It's a good question. There is a lot of noise around kind of credit scores and Vantage and Fair Isaac and Advantage can, you know, qualify more borrowers, all those sort of things. The reality is, Mahir, the GSEs haven't changed their systems yet. So until that happens, you know, there's really not going to be change. So, like, a lender would be unable today to kind of, quote, get something past the GSEs. It gets back to my point. The GSEs, their systems are fantastic in terms of DU and LP, very sophisticated. And if they do get through it, they're most likely their QC and repurchase program. They're going to put that back to lenders. So lenders have, I think lenders have really understood that the game today, and you're seeing some of the bigger lenders do it, the game today is all about lowering and being efficient on origination costs. That hasn't always been the case. So if you go before the crisis, what would happen is if you get a small or midsize mortgage banker and all of a sudden production is down, they immediately go to credit expansion, right? I wouldn't normally do that loan, but, you know, I have fixed costs. I'm going to try to get that loan in either through the GSEs or to whole loan buyers. You can't do that today. I mean, whether it's you're trying to get it through the GSEs, you're trying to go through some of the larger correspondent purchases like Penny Mac, whose systems are also excellent, and it's not going to happen. So you're almost, you have to either, you have to manage costs. And again, from a credit provider, that's exactly where we want it. So we're not too worried about it. And if it were to go, we mentioned this last call, if it were to change, right? And I'm not saying it's going, if it were to change and you could have like kind of a wider fairway, so to speak, so more things qualify. The fact that our credit engine doesn't really rely on FICO, we're really, we're almost credit score agnostic. We're looking at the 400 kind of variables underneath that along with things in the 1003. We're not too worried. We can see through that. In fact, our model works better when things are a little bit more disparate, so to speak. It doesn't work as well in a market like this. It kind of works more from a premium standpoint, picking and choosing, but credit, you almost don't really need it from a FICO standpoint. So again, I think I would look at it that way. I think it's something that we're pleased with, but I don't see any kind of chink in the guardrails to date.

Okay. Thank you for taking my question.

And again, it is star one if you would like to ask a question. And our next question comes from the line of Doug Harder with UBS. Your line is open.

Thanks. Can you talk about your plan to upstream capital from the MI subsidiary? It sounds like do you have a lot of capacity left for the year? Do you kind of spill that over or do a large dividend in the fourth quarter?

I think it's pretty consistent with the dividends. It might be a little bit larger in the fourth quarter for sure. I think, again, as we look at kind of P. Myers, Doug, and credit and where it's going, we feel comfortable continuing to upstream cash from guarantee to U.S. holdings. And as I said earlier, there's a little bit of friction getting it back to the group level, and that's not the worst problem to have. And also, we have the quota share of reinsurance. That's one of the reasons we took it up to 50 earlier this year. That's another kind of backdoor way to get cash up to the holdco.

And then, obviously, you bought Tidal a little while ago. Can you just talk about how you're thinking about the benefits of the great business that is MI versus looking to further diversify and, you know, have other avenues of growth?

Yeah, I mean, I think right now, it's a good question. I think title has performed pretty much in line with what we thought, if we would have thought rates would be this high, to try to be honest with you. I think if rates go lower, we're very levered to rates, given the lender focus of the business. We have an underwriter. It's really kind of in its still small stages growing primarily in Texas and Florida and a bit of the southeast. That's kind of the purchase angle of the business, but it's small. So the real lever is lenders and refinance. And we've continued to add lenders. We're working on developing a new system. We're still building the business out per se, and we're fine with that. So it's kind of in corporate and other Doug. And think of that almost as like an incubator. So again, if it gets big enough, it'll pop up as its own segment. If it stays small, it stays small. And that could happen. And, you know, clearly S&R has some opportunities outside of mortgage. We haven't really done anything yet, but there's things that we look at. So I would look at that as another, quote, you know, incubator. We kind of call them call options. But for the time being, clearly the focus and where the cash flow is coming is from the MI business. And when we look at investment opportunities, whether it's title, other acquisitions that come to us, we still feel at this time, our stock's the best value. And we're kind of voting with our feet there. And I don't really expect it to change absent some large movement in the stock. And then if there's a large movement in the stock, which, you know, it would be nice per se, but not necessarily. If you're in the business of buying back shares and shrinking ownership, this isn't the worst place to be in. If the stock were to move outside of our range, we would probably do like a special dividend. We'll continue to look for ways to get capital back to shareholders. But given just how good the MI business is today, you know, we would need to, again, And there's going to have to be a good reason for us to do it. And I look at it, if you're looking at a way to kind of quantify it, our book value per share today is right around $60. So it's a tad below $58. It'll finish, my guess is it'll finish the year around $60, Doug. So if we look and say, hey, we're going to grow it 10%, 12% a year, which we've been doing, that book value per share over the next four or five years is going to be $85, $90. It's a big, big picture, right, just looking at the numbers. So as we look at an acquisition, it's going to have to either help us increase that book value per share target or achieve that book value per share target sooner, all else being equal or making us a stronger company and things like that. There's other factors in there. That's a pretty high bar. That's a pretty high bar. We kind of know this business well. And like what I've said just in my response to Rick earlier, this is such a good business. We're a little bit spoiled. in terms of how good the business is. Again, there's going to be some bumps along the road. There always are, but that's why you have capital, right? You have capital to withstand those bumps, and reinsurance is another form of capital. We expect kind of those expected losses per se, and then you have capital on reinsurance for unexpected losses. They'll come, but that's what we're prepared for. We don't necessarily try to sit down and say, where's the market going? We try to prepare for every, you know, different avenue that the market potentially could go down. I mean, that just comes with experience. We've been doing this for quite a while. But that being said, so, you know, summing up the investment right now continues to be an asset. I don't expect that, the change, absence of something really, you know, something really special comes along.

Appreciate that, Mark.

And there are no additional questions at this time, so I will now turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for their time and questions, and have a great weekend.

And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.