Thank you, Christine, and good morning, everyone. We certainly appreciate your time today and your interest in Graham Corporation. Here with me on the call are Dan Thoren, our President and CEO; and Chris Thome, our Chief Financial Officer. You should have a copy of the first quarter fiscal 2024 financial results as well as the strategic investment release that we put out this morning over the wires. If you don't, you can access both releases and our slides on our website at ir.grahamcorp.com. The slides on the website will accompany our conversation today. Dan and Chris are going to provide their formal remarks, after which we will open the line for questions. But if you will turn to Slide 2, I will review the safe harbor statement. You should be aware that we may make some forward-looking statements during the formal discussion as well as during the Q&A session. These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties as well as other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated here today. These risks and uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release as well as with other documents filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can find those documents on our website or at sec.gov. During today's call, we will also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these will be useful in evaluating our performance. However, you should not consider the presentation of this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have provided reconciliation of non-GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today's release and slides. We also use key performance indicators to help gauge the progress and performance of the company. These key performance metrics are orders, backlog, and book-to-bill. Their operational measures and the company's methodology for calculating these numbers does not meet the definition of a non-GAAP measure as that term is defined by the SEC but so as a result, a quantitative reconciliation of each of these is not required to provide, which you can find the disclaimer regarding our use of key performance metrics at the back of our deck in the supplemental slides. So with that, if you would please advance to Slide 3, I'll turn it over to Dan to begin. Dan?

Thanks, Debbie, and good morning, everyone. We reported better-than-expected results for our first quarter of fiscal '24, giving us a strong start to the year. Revenue grew 32% to a quarterly record of $47.6 million, gross margin expanded to 23%, and earnings per diluted share increased over 4 times to $0.25. We had a few benefits to the quarter that were working in our favor. We had a very favorable mix as a result of better-priced projects and project timing. We are also seeing the impacts of improving execution, the expanded capacity we have created through productivity and increased direct labor, and better pricing in our backlog. Aside from our strong results, we also announced a major strategic investment by a defense customer to expand our capabilities in our Batavia operations in support of the naval nuclear propulsion program. The investment will be used to ensure we can support the U.S. Navy's shipbuilding plan. Chris will talk more about the investment and how we expect to recognize it through revenue over many years. We believe this investment validates the tough decisions we had to make in fiscal 2022. That year, we chose to make significant investments to deliver quality products in a timely manner to our customer. Back then, those decisions had a major negative impact on our earnings. As I noted in the release, there is a lot to be excited about here at Graham. We have made measurable progress, and we are seeing it in our results. But what is not as visible to the outside is the advancements we are making as an organization. We have quite a bit of ground yet to cover, but I'm very encouraged by the development of a culture of openness, challenge, and growth that I am seeing in the team. We are in the third or maybe fourth evolution of Graham since its inception in 1936 and IPO in 1968. Our history is an important demonstration of the sustainability and resilience of the business, but our future is what drives us. And while we still have much work to do, I am proud of what our team has accomplished and their openness to change and advancement. With that, let me turn it over to Chris for the financial details. Chris?

Thank you, Dan, and good morning, everyone. If you turn to Slide 4, you can see that we had strong sales growth for our first quarter of fiscal 2024, with record sales of $47.6 million. This was up 32% over the prior year period as well as up 11% from the trailing fourth quarter. As Dan mentioned, the quarter was better than expected and benefited from an improved mix of higher-margin defense projects as well as the timing of material receipts and the completion of some contract projects, which we originally expected in the second quarter of this year. Higher sales were also driven by better execution and improved pricing. Defense led the way with $22.8 million in revenue, which was up $13 million over the prior year, a 133% increase. Commercial aftermarket sales to the refining and petrochemical markets continue to be strong and were $9.2 million, up 49%. These improvements in defense and aftermarket more than offset softness in the refining industries and declines in the space market. U.S. sales were 80% of total revenue, up 35% year-over-year, primarily driven by our growth in defense. Gross profit and margin improved measurably. Gross profit was $11 million, and gross margin was 23.1%, up $4.2 million and 440 basis points, respectively. This reflects a favorable mix as a result of better-priced projects and timing due to build schedules. We're also seeing the positive impacts on margin from improving execution, the expanded capacity we have created through productivity and increased direct labor, and better pricing in our backlog. SG&A inclusive of amortization in the first quarter of fiscal 2024 was $7.3 million or 15% of sales, up $1.5 million over the prior year period. Approximately $900,000 of the increase was attributable to higher performance-based compensation expense, including $800,000 related to the supplemental performance bonus payout to Barbara Nichols employees in connection with the 2021 acquisition. If you turn to Slide 5, you can see we had net income in the quarter of $0.25 per diluted share or $2.6 million, a notable increase over last year. On a non-GAAP basis, adjusted net income and net income per diluted share were $3.6 million and $0.33, respectively, measurably improved over $1.3 million and $0.12, respectively, for the same period a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA grew to $5.6 million or 11.8% of sales, also reflecting the improvements in our business compared with last year's first quarter of adjusted EBITDA of $2.7 million or 7.6% of sales. Turning to Slide 6. You can see how we are strengthening our balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2023, increased 35% or $6.4 million to $24.7 million compared with the end of the fourth quarter. Our cash generation is improving with better operating performance but is expected to be lumpy due to the timing of receipt of customer deposits and the corresponding material purchases associated with those deposits. Cash generated from operations in the first quarter was $8.6 million. Debt during the quarter was down $400,000 to $11.3 million. As of June 30, 2023, the company was in compliance with this lending agreement with a leverage ratio of just 1.6x. On June 30, 2023, the amount available under our revolving credit facility was approximately $26 million and provides adequate liquidity to fund our strategic growth initiatives. Capital expenditures for the first quarter of fiscal 2024 were $1.5 million. We have updated our expectation for CapEx in fiscal 2024 to range between $12 million and $13.5 million. The $6.5 million increase is primarily related to the strategic investment we received from our defense customer and our planned spending to expand our capabilities in our Batavia operation to meet the Navy's shipbuilding schedule. If you will now turn to Slide 7, I'll review our orders for the quarter. During the quarter, we had orders of $67.9 million, which were up $27.6 million or 69% over the prior year and resulted in a book-to-bill ratio of 1.4x. Included in orders and backlog is the $13.5 million strategic investment from a major defense customer we have been talking about, which we announced separately today. The investment is expected to flow through revenue over the next 8 to 10 years and will be associated with potential future orders and delivering on the $8.5 million of follow-on orders we received from that customer during the quarter. Space orders were $4.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2024, down from the historically high $7.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2023, but higher than the $2.5 million in orders received in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023. Space continues to be a strategic focus for us and a meaningful part of our business. Turning to Slide 8, we show our backlog. You could see that it is up 24% over a year ago and 7% sequentially to a record $322 million. The defense backlog is up $60 million or 31% over last year and includes that strategic investment from the major defense customer I just mentioned. Approximately 50% of orders currently in the backlog are expected to be converted to sales in the next 12 months, and another 25% to 30% is expected to convert to sales over the following year. The majority of orders expected to convert beyond 12 months are for the defense industry, specifically the U.S. Navy. Turning to Slide 9. We can review our updated guidance for fiscal 2024. We are increasing our revenue projection to $170 million to $180 million, up $5 million from our previous guidance on the lower and top end. Our new guidance suggests top-line growth over fiscal 2023 of about 11% at the midpoint of that range. This is right in line with our strategy to grow in the mid- to high single digits annually in order to achieve our fiscal 2027 goal of greater than $200 million in revenue. It also captures the better-than-expected performance in the first quarter, which we expect will normalize for the remainder of the year. From a margin perspective, we are updating the gross margin guidance to 18% to 19%, which is an additional 100 basis points over our previous guidance on the top and bottom end. Our guidance remains the same for SG&A percentage as well as for our effective tax rate. Similar to revenue, we have increased our adjusted EBITDA guidance by $1 million at the top and bottom of the range to $11.5 million to $13.5 million, which suggests an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 7% at the midpoint of the range. These increases to our guidance reflect our better-than-expected start to the year and incorporate more normalized performance for the remainder of the year. As we start to work on our better price contracts, employing our much improved processes, we expect margins to improve steadily each year in order to achieve our low to mid-teen adjusted EBITDA margin goal in 2027. With that, I will pass the call back for concluding remarks.

Thank you, Chris. I am on Slide 10. I have covered the pillars of our strategy on Slide 10 previously. I would just like to reemphasize that it takes a team that understands our customers' critical challenges to help them find solutions, which drives our success. We are doing this on many fronts, which is also driving our diversification. We have much going on in space, new energy, cryogenics, refining, petrochem, as well as defense. We are well on our way to achieve our growth and profitability goals for fiscal 2027. And even beyond that, I believe our long-term outlook is very encouraging, and I hope you share in that excitement. With that, Christine, we can open the call for questions.

Our first question comes from Theodore O'Neill with Litchfield Hills Research.

So Chris, I was wondering if you can clarify the strategic investment, which sounds to me like this is for spending on CapEx, yet in your prepared remarks, you included it in orders and backlog and say it will be drawn down over the next 8 years, which sounds like advanced deposits.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Theo. I realize that this can be a little bit confusing. So we received $13.5 million towards strategic CapEx purchases and $8.5 million of follow-on orders related to the strategic program, which these investments relate to. You are correct. We are including those in our balance sheet as customer deposits like a prepayment. However, when we spend the money on the CapEx, it's going to go through as capital expenditures. So it's going to cause some lumpiness in our cash flow statement over the next several years here. Under the terms of the agreement, we're not allowed to charge our customer for the depreciation on this equipment, and it is related to specific orders for this strategic program. So we determined that it is really revenue, so it's going to be flowing through revenue as we work on the current orders as well as potential future orders over the next 8 to 10 years.

And will this have sort of a one-time use for this particular customer and application? Or is there other usefulness to this?

We must prioritize our customer's strategic program while utilizing the machinery and equipment. However, if there is excess capacity, we can definitely apply it to other revenue-generating activities. Ultimately, the equipment is registered under our name.

Okay. Can you give us an update on your CapEx plans for some of the long lead time items and also update us on how it's going to grow your welding capacity?

Yes. So as Chris said in his remarks, I think there was like $6.5 million that will be charged to the CapEx this year, right?

An increase of, yes.

Yes. So in that strategic investment, there's everything from building additions to machine tools for drilling holes and turning different raw materials, so turning in milling machines. There's welding machines associated with that. There's all kinds of different rolling machines. And so it's a wide variety of things as you look at all the machines that are needed to process those particular heat exchangers for our customer. They're basically helping us get tooled up to really push those through quicker than we would be able to on our own. So yes, there's definitely welding machines in there, but there's everything else too.

Our next question comes from the line of Gary Schwab with Valley Forge Capital Management.

Yes. Chris, I think you surprised a lot of people with this release. Good work.

Thank you, Gary.

Thanks, Gary.

Anyway, it's been a year since you delivered your first 2 steam condensers. The next 2 should be very close to delivery or have you delivered them already? Can you comment on that?

Yes. So we did deliver 1 more at the beginning of July, and we have 1 more that's scheduled to go in the third quarter of this year.

I wanted to ask you about something. I have just moved into a new house and bought a pair of 6-drawer dressers from IKEA that I had to assemble. I spent about half the time building the second dresser compared to the first one, but I don't think I'd take much longer on a third one. You mentioned how your teams are questioning and challenging each other. Were there any significant new practices or innovations developed that resulted in a notable improvement in savings and productivity on your second articles? How much more labor or innovation do you think you can extract from a third article?

Yes. So what you're describing is a learning curve. Essentially, you learned by building the first one, and you can apply those lessons learned to the second one. You don't have to improve your processes or improve your tools or anything, and you actually get some benefit just from the learning of how to do things and in what sequence, et cetera. But then if you start to look at your process and consider how you can reduce time or make processes go in parallel or things like that, you can start to get even further down that learning curve. So in the manufacturing industry, you'll see learning curves that are very steep at the very beginning for small quantities. And then as you increase quantities or basically accumulate builds, you'll start to see that learning curve flatten. Each one of those learning curves really is product and process specific, so I wouldn't even attempt to start to name savings from first article to the second to third to fourth to fifth just because they are so dependent upon the process, the product, and ultimately the people. But we are very active in looking at this process, mapping those processes, helping our folks with better tools, better supervision, and timely receipt of materials, and all of that. It's the nature of a manufacturing business that if you have one, you live it, and you really enjoy the improvements that you can make in your process and your people over time.

So you think you can squeeze a lot more margin out of the third articles that you'll be building over the second?

Yes. As you build more of them, the improvements or the reduction in time starts to decrease for each one, and that's what they call moving down the learning curve. So you'll save probably the most between the first and the second, a little bit less between the second and third, and you'll save a little bit less between the third and the fourth, et cetera.

Okay. So there are still savings?

Absolutely, there are still savings. It just flattens.

Did the efficiency and productivity of the second article align with your initial expectations when you began the first article, or did you exceed your anticipated outcomes?

Good question that I don’t know the answer to, actually. There was definitely the savings; did our guys and gals really predict it or not, I couldn't tell you.

Okay. I didn't know if you figured predicted a margin that you thought you would save or an additional margin you would make or shorten your labor time on the second one over the first.

Gary, but I couldn't quote it to you.

And it's different for every program. And as you know, we have multiple programs in the backlog.

Our next question comes from the line of Brett Kearney with Gabelli Funds.

Congrats on the continued momentum.

Thanks, Brett.

Thanks, Brett.

Just following up on the strategic investment. This is for, I guess, to get yourself aligned with your customer for new work you all will be bidding on with the U.S. Navy going forward?

Correct. So we already did have a few orders in our backlog. Right after we received the PO for the strategic investment we received another order for several more units. And then we will have the opportunity down the road to bid on other jobs and other units as they come up for bid.

Okay. Excellent. It sounds like your plans include more advanced machinery. How are you planning to address the labor requirements to support the ramp-up for these new lines?

Yes, that's a great question, Brett. Just like everyone else, we're not immune to the difficult labor market that's out there. I will say that overall, our human resources team has done a fabulous job. Our labor is actually up 44 people since this time last year, which is about a 9% increase, but within our budget, we still expect to increase our labor force another 8%. We've done a great job till now. But as you can imagine, to grow your revenue 8% to 10% a year, you need to build your workforce equivalently. But we've been able to manage through it so far, and our HR team is doing great with the programs that they have with the local community colleges, the Arc and Flame welding program that we partnered with the local community colleges with and other programs that are out there. So they've done a really great job being able to keep up with our growth to this point.

Our next question comes from the line of Rick Ryan with Oak Ridge Financial.

And also, congratulations on a strong report, guys. Chris, I think you mentioned better pricing and backlog. Is that more a mix, the end market composition there? Or actually, are you seeing better pricing? And if you are, what markets would that be occurring in?

We are experiencing improved pricing across several areas. Due to demand, we have increased pricing in the aftermarket multiple times over the past year. This reflects the natural pricing adjustments that occur after completing initial article programs, as subsequent bids are influenced by the hours spent on the first unit. Additionally, we are becoming more efficient in production, which will also contribute to margin expansion. The improved pricing mix includes higher-priced second and third article units, alongside the aftermarket.

And I think I'd add to that, that we're able to get a little bit better pricing even on the commercial side, the refinery, petrochem. We are seeing that heat up a little bit. Certainly, the aftermarket has been busy for the last 1.5 years. We're seeing some capital projects starting to come through. The pricing on those, we're able to get a little bit better pricing than we have in the past even on the commercial side. So it's improving, I would say, across several different markets.

And I guess, I would just add to that. We've also been putting and stressing to the team about going back where our customers caused a delay or they caused the cost to go up for either more engineering that they request, or if there was a delay in the order and material prices go up. We've been encouraging the team to go back, and we've been successful in negotiating change orders and increasing the PO prices to compensate us for that. So that's also being built into some of the pricing that you're seeing as well.

Okay. I thought you would focus more on pursuing some of the aftermarket business, so it’s encouraging to see that yielding results. Dan, you briefly mentioned noticing some improvement in the energy sector. Is that in the domestic market? What trends are you observing in your operations in India and China regarding energy?

Yes. So we have seen an uptick domestically. We won a big order in India, and China has been really slow coming out of COVID. Our pipeline domestically really cleared out a little bit here this last quarter, where we got several different orders, but we just haven't seen the China market come back as quickly as we thought that we would at this point.

What was the size of the India award?

Yes, it was about $9 million.

And what's the delivery time frame on that?

I'd say over the next 1.5 years.

Our next question comes from Bill Baldwin with Baldwin Anthony Securities.

I would just like to hear your comments and insights on what you're seeing right now in terms of activity or what kind of projects you're kind of aiming for in terms of potential future activity regarding your new energy initiatives and your cryogenic initiatives that I know you're involved with. Can you provide a little color there as to what types of projects you're working on or looking at?

Yes, we can. I would say that the hydrogen inquiries have increased. And so there's a lot of these air products types, the industrial gas types of companies that are looking at hydrogen and see a real opportunity to start to serve that market in the future. So I actually went to a hydrogen conference in Houston last month and learned what was going on there. There are lots of technology developments and lots of investments in infrastructure for hydrogen production, distribution of hydrogen, fueling of hydrogen vehicles, et cetera. I went to the National Renewable Energy Lab to understand what they're doing—quite a bit of activity on the hydrogen side. I would say that the biggest thing that we're seeing is really probably on the hydrogen side, and people are interested in all phases from production all the way through fueling using hydrogen. The future is anybody's guess as to how it really unfolds, but it's interesting to compare it to the space environment that we saw a decade ago where it was all government. Now we're starting to see quite a few commercial companies starting to put their own money into it. So it's pretty interesting. And then small modular nuclear, we continue to see just a steady push to develop technology there. There are several different companies that are working in different technology areas, and we're trying to support as many as we can. That's a much longer effort, I think. I would suspect that if the hydrogen economy really goes, it will pay dividends sooner than the small modular nuclear. But those are the two biggest areas that we're involved with right now. Graham is also supporting some of the biodiesel sustainable aircraft fuel—and those are more on the process side. Some of the heat exchanger vacuum equipment that Graham has made for a long time is being used in those plants also. So we're covering quite a bit of the new energy space, and we'll see which one really takes off here.

And any specific comments on the cryogenic projects or types of activities going on there?

Yes. So cryogenic...

Is that part of hydrogen or part of...

That's hydrogen. Yes. So they're using gas, hydrogen gas, and they're also looking at liquid hydrogen for fuel and transport as well as some of the other carrier-type fluids like ammonia. All of that is being discussed in the distribution and transportation of hydrogen. Yes, that's where the cryogenic pumps come in for the liquid hydrogen.

We have no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

Thank you for joining us today. We continue to demonstrate progress with our plan, and we are putting proof points on the board. We have lots of opportunity to continue to grow and diversify. I look forward to updating you further with our second quarter. Enjoy your day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.