Hello, and welcome to today's Graphic Packaging First Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. My name is Daly, and I will be the moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. I would now like to pass the conference over to Melanie Skijus, Vice President of Investor Relations. Melanie, please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to Graphic Packaging Holding Company's conference call to discuss our first quarter 2022 results. Speaking on the call will be Mike Doss, the Company's President and CEO; and Steve Scherger, Executive Vice President and CFO. To help you follow along with today's call, we will be referencing our first quarter presentation, which can be accessed via the webcast through self-directed slides and also in the Investors section of our website at www.graphicpkg.com. I would like to remind everyone that statements of our expectations, plans, estimates, and beliefs regarding future performance and events constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on currently available information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's present expectations. Information regarding these risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements as such statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. And the Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements except as required by law. Mike, I'll turn it over to you.

Thank you, Melanie. Good morning to everyone joining us on the call and this webcast this morning. We're off to a great start in 2022, and I'm pleased to share with you a very strong first quarter. We're operating well and doing what we said we would do, including delivering another quarter of net organic sales growth, pivoting to a positive price-to-commodity input cost relationship, driving margins higher, and executing a very significant step-up in adjusted EBITDA. We'll spend some time on today's call discussing these positive results and the operating model we've implemented to drive continued profitable growth and returns to our stakeholders. Adjusted EBITDA was $350 million, an increase of 46% year-over-year. Adjusted earnings per share, excluding amortization of purchased intangibles, improved 78% to $0.48. Net sales for the quarter were a record $2.2 billion, up 36% year-over-year, driven by a 3% net organic sales growth, successful execution of pricing initiatives, and contributions from acquisitions. Notably, the first quarter marks the eighth out of nine quarters that we have delivered net organic sales growth, building on our track record of consistent, long-term organic sales growth performance. During the quarter, we advanced two transformative company investments we initiated to extend our global leadership in fiber-based packaging. Both have recently been completed, bringing months, in the case of Kalamazoo, years of hard work to fruition. After closing the packaging acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2021, we continued to actively integrate our expanded European platform in the first quarter. Our dedicated teams have been working collaboratively, meeting early integration targets, and are on track to deliver $40 million of synergies over the next 2.5 years. Separately, our new K2 machine and CRB platform optimization investment in Kalamazoo, first announced in 2019, came to life during the quarter. The K2 machine is operating and continues to ramp up production. The start-up is meeting expectations. The investment in our CRB platform will yield substantial quality and efficiency enhancements, provide environmental benefits, including lower greenhouse gas emissions and water usage, and deliver $130 million of incremental EBITDA over the next three years, with $50 million in incremental EBITDA expected this year. Financially, we continue to see robust demand for innovative fiber-based consumer packaging solutions. Given strong underlying demand, company-specific initiatives driving expansion and profitable growth, and overall excellent performance globally, we are reiterating our 2022 financial guidance provided at our Investor Day in February. We have a strong business. We are quickly deleveraging. And we have greater than $1 billion in global liquidity. While we are performing very well, we aren't operating in a vacuum. I would be remiss not to acknowledge the geopolitical events that are impacting our global communities. As humanitarians and global citizens, we are living in very unsettling times. Our hearts go out to the people of Ukraine and all those standing in harm's way. On Slide 4, let me provide an update on the business we acquired in Russia in the fourth quarter of 2021 as part of the AR Packaging acquisition. Our business in Russia consists of two folding carton facilities, one in St. Petersburg and the other in Timashevsk. The converting facilities primarily serve multinational food service and tobacco customers for local Russian consumption. The business is small, accounting for roughly 1% of total sales and less than 1% of annualized EBITDA. We are adhering to all U.S. and European Union sanctions and are currently operating to meet existing customer contractual commitments where possible. We are not making any new investments in the region nor are we entering into agreements with new customers. We will continue to explore all options for the business as existing customer agreements expire. Turning back to the quarter and expected full year 2022 financial results on Slide 5, I will discuss pricing actions implemented and recognized over the 2021 and 2022 timeframe. In Q1, as we guided, we pivoted to a $46 million positive price-cost relationship. $222 million of price flowed through the business and more than offset $176 million of commodity input cost inflation. Importantly, in Q2, pricing momentum continues, and we expect the positive price/cost relationship to expand into the range of $80 million to $100 million as we make further headway recovering the price/cost dislocation experienced in 2021. You can see on the right hand of Slide 5 that our implemented and recognized price actions are expected to result in approximately $850 million of positive pricing flowing through the business in 2022. Our current price expectations are $150 million higher than our original guidance. The unprecedented inflationary environment in which we are operating continued throughout the first quarter. Accordingly, we have increased our 2022 inflation range by $150 million to $450 million to $650 million. We continue to forecast that pricing initiatives will more than offset commodity input cost inflation in the range of $200 million to $400 million in 2022, more than fully recovering the 2021 price/cost dislocation. Turning to Slide 6 and the integration of our recently expanded European platform, the new leadership team in Europe is in place and is made up equally of Graphic Packaging and AR Packaging executives, with strong packaging and sustainability backgrounds, customer relationships, and commercial and operating expertise. The team has exhibited immediate chemistry, quickly coming together as a cohesive group focused on results. With the best practices of both organizations leveraged, we are realizing efficiencies while strengthening our global innovation engine. We are energized as interest from existing and new customers is on the rise, and we are identifying customer and geographic expansion opportunities. Our dedicated employees have maintained a steadfast approach to integration activities, and we are on track to deliver $40 million of synergies over the next 2.5 years. With approximately $2 billion in annualized sales, our European business has scale, vast resources, and is benefiting our entire global book of business by leading in sustainable and supported packaging innovation while also delivering on trends that we believe will continue to drive organic sales growth around the world. The second transformative investment being successfully executed, a source of anticipated large scale benefits for customers and returns for stakeholders, is our new K2 CRB machine and platform optimization project. On Slide 7, you will see a snapshot of the new K2 machine hall during the final stages of our start-up. We began operating at scale during the quarter and are continuing to ramp up production. New paperboard produced on the K2 machine is being integrated into our converting facilities. Customers are delighted with the formation, quality, and printability of the paperboard. We are continuing to ramp up to service the increased demand for CRB we are experiencing. This, in turn, will continue to drive company integration rates higher. $50 million of the expected $130 million in total incremental EBITDA from this investment will be achieved in 2022 as we bring down one of the higher-cost mill locations designated in our original optimization plan. In February, we notified our Battle Creek employees that we will decommission the mill over the coming months as the K2 ramp-up progresses on plan. I'm extremely pleased to report that some of our Battle Creek employees will transition to Kalamazoo to support the volume we will be producing on our expanded campus. I want to personally thank all of the hard-working men and women in the Battle Creek mill that supported this project and ensured continuity for our customers as we made this important transition. I will wrap up my comments on Slide 8 with an update on innovation and organic growth we see as our new and evolving suite of fiber-based packaging solutions are adopted globally. We launched PaperSeal in 2020, a new barrier line fiber-based packaging alternative to plastic trays for fresh meat, cheeses, and salads. From its original innovation, we introduced new iterations including paper seal slice, paper seal wedge, and paper seal cook, broadening the number of customers and markets served to include fresh pasta, deli meats, and frozen items. Customer adoption of PaperSeal, following similar sustainability adoption trends around the world, was first commercialized by major retailers across Europe and Australia. With the pasta package showcased here for New Seasons market, which grows around the West Coast, we are now commercial in the United States. New Seasons market was the first mover in the U.S., adopting PaperSeal to replace plastic clamshells in an effort to shift to more sustainable packaging with less waste. As typically occurs, once new packaging innovation is commercialized by a first mover in the market, we expect to see additional customers converting. And we have a second grocer entering a multi-week test phase with this solution. As another example, our ProducePack solution, first commercialized by Michigan apple distributor Bell Harvest in the U.S. in the third quarter of 2021, gained great interest from producers and grocers eager to learn more about its sustainability benefits. We are excited to see that our ProducePack punnet line will be launching with a very large grocery retailer in the U.S. during the second quarter. As you can see, we've been working hard and remain laser-focused on servicing customers and executing our strategic initiatives. We are focused on results and remain on track to achieve our enhanced Vision 2025 goals. With that, I will hand the call over to Steve for a review of financials. Steve, over to you.

Thanks, Mike, and good morning. Moving to Slide 9, focused on key financial highlights. Net sales increased 36% or $596 million from the prior year period to a record $2.2 billion. The year-over-year increase in sales was driven by 3% net organic sales growth, higher price flowing through the business, and contributions from acquisitions. We delivered 100 basis points of margin expansion on higher sales as a result of ongoing disciplined pricing actions to offset the inflationary environment, higher volume mix, and strong operating execution. Given the operating leverage we are driving, adjusted EBITDA increased an even greater 46% year-over-year to $350 million. Adjusted earnings per share, excluding amortization of purchased intangibles, grew 78% to $0.48 a share. We are including an adjustment for purchase intangibles in the adjusted EPS calculation moving forward as it more accurately reflects the operating earnings and cash flow capabilities of the Company and is a metric used by investors. Finally, our integration rate increased 200 basis points year-over-year to 73% as we internalized paperboard into our global converting operations. As a reminder, we currently purchase 1 million tons of paperboard to support our global converting operations. On Slides 10 and 11, you will find our revenue and EBITDA waterfalls. The drivers of the 36% year-over-year increase in sales were $222 million in pricing and $385 million of higher volume mix from organic sales growth and acquisitions, slightly offset by $11 million of unfavorable foreign exchange. Adjusted EBITDA increased $110 million or 46% year-over-year to $350 million in the first quarter versus the prior year period. Commodity input cost inflation increased sequentially from Q4 by $34 million to $176 million. Labor, benefits, and other inflation were $19 million. Despite the larger inflationary headwinds in Q1, we produced significant growth in EBITDA, driven by $222 million of positive price, $68 million of volume mix, and $14 million of net performance. On Slide 12, let me dive deeper into our quarterly performance. It was a solid quarter by any measure. Our recent acquisitions are performing well and delivering expected returns. Our foodservice business continued to recover year-over-year, with sales up 30%, driven by price and organic sales growth. Our food, beverage, and consumer businesses grew sales 14% year-over-year before acquisitions, also driven by positive price and organic sales growth. As it relates to paperboard market data, the FMPA will be reporting industry operating rates for the first quarter on April 29. We continue to experience strong demand for our products. Backlogs have increased across all three substrates, with all at 10-plus weeks at the end of the first quarter. Our paperboard inventory levels remain low. Focusing briefly on capital allocation, pro forma net leverage at the end of the first quarter was 4.6x. We continue to expect year-end net leverage to be between 3x and 3.5x as we utilize significant cash flow generation to reduce debt while adjusted EBITDA and EBITDA margins grow substantially year-over-year. Finally, we continue to maintain significant liquidity in the business at over $1 billion. Turning now to full-year 2022 guidance on Slide 13. Given first quarter financial results and the confidence we have in the critical initiatives we are executing this year, we are reiterating our guidance today for adjusted EBITDA, cash flow, sales, and year-end leverage. The EBITDA and cash flow year-over-year details have not changed. Pricing will more than offset commodity input cost inflation. Acquisitions will meet our expectations. Organic sales growth will continue to be at or above our 100 to 200 basis point commitment, and performance, including the ramp of Kalamazoo, will drive real benefits to EBITDA and cash flow. On Slide 14, I will wrap up my prepared remarks with our guidance for adjusted EPS, excluding amortization of purchased intangibles. Adjusted earnings per share growth during the quarter was significant, up 78% year-over-year. We remain on track to deliver adjusted earnings per share for the year in a range of $1.75 to $2.25. That concludes our prepared commentary this morning. Let me now turn the call over to the operator for questions.

Our first question today comes from Ghansham Panjabi from Baird. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Congratulations on a great start to the year. Could you provide an update on what you're experiencing regarding operating and supply chain efficiency at this moment? In the past, you've mentioned labor constraints affecting you and your customers, as well as issues with trucking. Can you give us a high-level overview of the current situation?

Steve can kind of talk about the inflationary impact of that, and then I'll give you a little color commentary on what that means from an operating backdrop.

Yes. Ghansham, within the quarter, I think what we certainly did see was the continued acceleration on the commodity input cost inflation. So, the $176 million that we had in inflation in Q1, we saw continued increases, $34 million, as I mentioned in the prepared commentary, from Q4 to Q1. Some of that was certainly our suppliers continuing to have supply chain challenges. We saw about $20 million to $50 million of inflation across the big categories of our spend: fiber, paperboard that we acquire, chemicals, energy, and logistics. So, it certainly showed up in the form of the inflation in Q1, which we discussed here. And then, Mike will talk a little bit about the supply chain.

Yes. I think, Ghansham, if you take a look at labor, in January, like most, we were struggling a bit with the Omicron variant. That impacted some of our operations as it did some of our suppliers as well. But that pretty much abated mid-February. March was a clean month. We ran well. One of our biggest challenges was rebuilding our labor force back in our food service, specifically our cup plants, as you know, that were hit very hard during the pandemic. But we saw that volume come back very strong, starting really in Q4 and into Q1. As a matter of fact, our Q1 volumes were actually slightly ahead of the pre-pandemic levels. So, we're pleased about that. It was a bit of a scramble. We still got some work to do on efficiencies in terms of how we operate those locations, but we're able to get the product out. And I would expect, as we grind through the second quarter and into the second half of the year, we'll continue to make progress along those lines.

Okay. Great. And then for my second question, as it relates to U.S. natural gas prices, which are starting to break out towards multiyear highs. Just remind us as to how you sort of approach managing exposure to those commodities, which may just become much more volatile than it has been in over a decade.

No, Ghansham. You're absolutely right. We certainly have seen that volatility play itself out. We're not materially hedged as we kind of move through Q2 through Q4. So, we'll absorb some of the impact of that. I think are in the...

Throughout $22 million.

$22 million range currently. So that will just give you a sense for the scale of it relative to the financial impact, which is obviously included in our guide, and we can talk about that a little bit along the way here as well.

And maybe just a little finer point on that, Ghansham. We continue to look for opportunities to burn bark and biomass in our virgin mills that allow us to use less natural gas. Our new Kalamazoo platform, obviously, is going to be more efficient than some of the smaller mills. So finding ways to use less is always a good solution to kind of managing that kind of input cost inflation.

Thank you. The next question today comes from George Staphos from Bank of America. George, please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Could you go back and explain where you're noticing input cost pressure? If possible, could you quantify it? I caught some of your response with Ghansham, but the connection was poor on my end. Also, regarding pricing, what do you think the impact of the pricing changes already made this year will be for 2023? If you're anticipating around $850 million this year, could it possibly reach an additional couple of hundred million? I haven't worked out the math, but I'd appreciate any insights. Additionally, I have a follow-up question about volume.

Yes, George. It's Steve. I'll take the inflation walk for you and then Mike can talk a little bit about the pricing. So let me just provide a little bit of detail that I think you were looking for. As I mentioned, $176 million of inflation in Q1, a bit of a high watermark, up $34 million from Q4 to Q1, and it was really across the board in terms of all of the major commodities. What we currently see is inflation in Q2 should be around $150 million. So, we'll see some modest decline on a year-over-year basis as we start to begin to lap some of the inflation that was occurring last year, which will put us at the midway point in the year of inflation in the low $300 million range, $325 million or so. Our current mark-to-market, which we tend to talk about, which is where are we currently, if everything kind of held as is for the year, is approximately $475 million. So, it's at the lower end of our range of $450 million and $650 million. But certainly, we've all seen, we're in extremely unusual tenant times, volatile times like we were just discussing on natural gas and other commodities. So, we feel like we've got an appropriate range for the year at the $450 million to $650 million. And as we've all seen, we've seen some possibilities of some abatement, but generally speaking, commodities really just continued to move up. And that's inherent in the full year range that we've provided, but the mark-to-market is roughly $475 million for full year '22 currently.

Yes. In terms of price, George, I think if we just kind of take a look at the pricing actions we've announced and executed on here today. They've all been recognized and in full. So what we're doing right now is pushing those recognitions through our contracts. You saw that we increased our pricing for the year by $150 million to upwards now of $850 million for 2022. We're certainly on track to deliver that. And what our plan would be is to quantify what our preliminary views of '23 would be in our mid-year mark, which would be in July, like we did last year before you — give you a preliminary look into what that looks like. It's meaningful from a carryover standpoint. And we'll make sure that you've got that. But as is our case, we'll do that midyear.

Understood, Mike. Actually, for my second question, I'll switch it up from what I initially thought. Are you seeing any kind of demand destruction or any pushing off of innovation launches, pilots that your customers were going to go ahead with on the paperboard side? Because of the pricing that you've needed to put into the market, obviously, given the inflation you talked about. Or is it really not from your vantage point having an effect yet on commercialization, trials, pilots and the like? And on the margin, do you think there's any pre-buying in your numbers in 1Q?

Yes. Thanks, George. I'll take the pre-buy upfront. Given the backlog that we have, I'm confident we have not pre-bought at Graphic Packaging. That's for sure. You saw our organic volumes up 3.3% in the quarter. Steve talked about backlogs increasing to 10 weeks across all three substrates. We're busy. And quite frankly, our board mills are sold out through the summer and into the fall already in terms of what the demand looks like. I think if I could point to one area that I've been disappointed that we have some more traction on, it'd probably be the office cycle. It's a great technology that, by the way, is intended to replace polyethylene on the inside of paper coverings. It's a great product. But many of our customers have been so focused on just getting their operations fast and fully staffed that we haven't had the real opportunity to really work with them on that particular initiative. So that would be the one I'd probably point to of any materiality. But overall, our volumes are very busy. Demand is solid. It's broad-based. We're seeing conversions out of single-use plastics and into paperboard, as evidenced by the organic volume we talked about year-end, the products that you see in our display. So all in all, a very strong operating backdrop for us right now.

Thank you. The next question today comes from Mark Wilde of Bank of Montreal. Mark, please go ahead. Your line is now open.

I'm wondering, Mike, if you can just give us any color on potential impact from the Russian sanctions on board flows over in Europe?

Yes. So from that standpoint, we profiled our Russian business for you, Mark. So you can kind of see, it's very small. From both the sales and EBITDA standpoint, it's not overly significant to the corporation; as a matter of fact, we call it de minimis. What we have seen, though, is some shifts. On a net basis, we'd actually call it probably net positive for us in terms of the volume of material that is flowing into some of our other plants as a result of some of the dislocation in the Ukraine in particular. And so, we've seen a lot written about, a lot talked about around kind of what that all means in terms of overall demand profiles we had in fall and early next year. But again, right now, as we sit here today, our backlogs are quite solid in all our carton plants in Europe. As you well know, we're a buyer of paperboard in that market. We do import some of our own paperboard into Europe, specifically for the beverage application. But our teams did a really good job in the fall securing tonnage from producers to make sure that we were in a position to respond to customers' needs this year, albeit at higher prices. We locked down at higher prices, and we've been able to pass that along in the form of price for currencies to be at the paperboard, and demand has remained strong in that market. So that’d be the color I'd kind of paint for you there. Net-net, may be a slight positive for us. We're watching closely because it's a fluid and dynamic market, as you can well appreciate. But the early read for us relative to what it means with the Lamar AR Packaging acquisition we did are performing at expectations or maybe slightly ahead.

Yes, Mark. It's Steve. Just to put a little color on that, as Mike was saying, we saw positive organic sales growth from the AR Packaging business in the quarter. Operating EBITDA was right at, in fact, a little better than our expectations, around $40 million. So, we were really pleased with the start that the team there established, as Mike articulated, as well as relative to the team coming together exceptionally well.

Okay. And then for my follow-on, Mike, I wondered if you could just give us some general thoughts on the progress on plastic substitution in Europe versus North America. It does seem like maybe North America is finally picking up a little steam relative to Europe. I noticed some of that, like warehouse clubs seem to be moving kind of produce out of clamshells and into paperboard alternatives.

Yes. So I would say Mark, it's pointing out is our thesis when we originally announced in May last year that Europe was ground zero for sustainability. That hasn't changed. The amount of initiatives we see going on in that market to replace single-use plastics and shrink wrap film in a variety of different products is very strong. As a matter of fact, imports into the U.S. from European producers were actually down for the first couple of months of this year because board is needed in that market. Of course, they'd rather sell it in that market than deal with the shipping costs bringing it here. And I think that's another interesting point to be made relative to kind of the trade flows to the paperboard. But I would also agree with you with your statement that we're seeing acceleration here in the North American market around the similar trends. I mean our paper steel in the variety of different applications that we've talked about profiled for you is strong, around the primer of the store is strong, replacing rigid applications with paperboard. We're seeing fruits and vegetables and provisioning for take-home meals for that evening or for lunch. So, that's a lot of singles and base hits, but they're pretty broad-based. And again, Mark, at that point, so that's really when you look at some of the volumes of some of the larger CPGs and some of the analysts have written about that being largely flat, we're growing. That's where it's coming from. It's coming from those types of substitutions really around the primer of the store and just getting out of rigid applications kind of in general in Europe, certainly shrink wrap film because that was a big, big market for carbonated soft drinks and beer.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Mark Weintraub from Seaport Research Partners. Mark, please go ahead. Your line is now open.

I understand that you will provide more details in midyear regarding the pricing rollover into 2023. Am I correct in thinking that part of this is influenced by the pricing trends observed in Pulp and Paper Week, and that there is a delay in how this impact is realized? I also assume that some of it is tied to cost escalators. It seems to me, and please correct me if I'm mistaken, that the increase to $850 million for this year likely includes some rise in cost escalators. I'd appreciate confirmation to ensure my understanding is accurate. Additionally, can we reasonably expect that, given the significant inflation, there will be related impacts in 2023? If we reach the higher end of the inflation projections you’ve mentioned, would that suggest a larger figure for next year? Overall, are these the right considerations?

Yes, Mark. It's Steve. You are directionally correct, and you know the business well. We have a combination of market-based models and cost-based models, and that six-month lag. You're absolutely right. We will see flow-through of the initiatives that we're just now executing on that will roll into '23, along with movement through for cost models, depending upon where in the range inflation flows. But if it is, like you said, it's the mid to high end, then that would result in additional price actions that would flow through. I think that's absolutely the imperative is the one we've executed on for years, ensuring that we have momentum for price continuing to offset commodity input cost inflation effectively. We had a very positive pivot in that direction in Q1, and we expect to see that positive impact make its way through Q2 and really for the rest of the year.

Great. For the second question, you're discussing $130 million in incremental EBITDA linked to K2. I believe you've adjusted that figure from the initial $100 million, but could you provide some clarification? Is the outlook you now have different from your previous expectations? It seems that the actions taken so far haven't resulted in as much capacity reduction as initially planned. Has this changed? And does this reflect in the increased $130 million incremental EBITDA that you anticipate from this project?

Yes, Mark. So really, what that reflects, and there's actually a slide in the deck, Slide 17, which is also one of them that we used at our Investor Day, where we said that we were going to continue to operate the Middletown facility, which in our original plan was to shut that down. So that is what's driving the incremental $30 million of EBITDA across that platform. We need those tons to run the business. With that footprint we've got right now, as you heard Steve say, we've got a 10-week backlog in every one of our substrates. So, there's an incremental 240,000 tons that when K2 is fully ramped, which will take over the next 18 to 24 months, that will be in the market. It will largely be going to ourselves because of the growth and demand that we're seeing in our own products.

Thank you. The next question today comes from Cleve Rueckert from UBS. Cleve, please go ahead. Your line is now open.

I wanted to explore the organic growth further and would appreciate insights on how the European market is performing compared to the North American market. You've touched on this a few times during the call, but we've heard the term recession mentioned by investors and others more frequently in the last couple of months than in the past five years. Could you provide specifics on how you're observing demand and organic growth trends in Europe and the U.S. separately?

Yes, Cleve. Thanks for that. It's Steve. I'll start, and then Mike can add some additional color. But we're very pleased that our organic sales growth is really across business globally as well as markets. And so overall, Europe organic growth was modestly above the number that we're articulating. So as we have just talked about, we've seen a little more early adoption of conversions. The consumer is proving to be resilient and continues its course given its food and beverage consumption and consumer packaging in Europe predominantly. The Europe platform has organic sales growth at or above where we're at in total. The Americas or the North American platform is positive as well, and as Mike mentioned, at the market level, food service has rebounded nicely in terms of organic sales growth. But even there, we have organic positive sales growth in our core food, beverage, and consumer businesses in North America. So, it's both market and geography across the totality of the platform, which contributed to the 3.3% in total.

I think maybe, Cleve, to think a little bit about it for Graphic. If you think about our end-use markets as a corporation, 56% of what we do globally is food and beverage. The 20% is food service. Then you've got consumer products in 20% and health and beauty aids, around 4%. In Europe, as you heard Steve mention, we're actually over-indexed to food and beverage. So while we're talking potentially about a recession or you're hearing about that from investors, it's still a physiological human need that you have to drink. So the question is, where are they going to get that stuff? And when you think about on-premise versus at-home and inflationary pressures, historically, our business has been pretty recession resistant, as you know. And we've got a slide in there in the very back that kind of shows what happened in 2008 versus what the Company we are actually today in 2022, which is very different. Our debt is a lot lower. Our cash interest cost is a lot lower; we're a lot bigger company. So relative positioning for our business to kind of handle a variety of macroeconomic developments, I think we're pretty well positioned to be able to weather those things.

Yes, that's great and really helpful. I have a follow-up question. Steve, I believe you mentioned earlier that backlogs are currently about 10 weeks. I'm curious about how this compares to your average or target backlog levels that you aim for and how they have historically performed.

Well, certainly, we like them strong. But I would tell you that in 10 weeks, we're actually beyond a little bit where I would hopefully be just to be able to service customers effectively, Cleve, because we're having to basically be very methodical around how we schedule our facilities, where the paperboard goes given some of the longer transit times we have on the international business for sure. But I guess, if you went back, historically, we've been more in the six- to-eight-week range over the last three or four years. So, they're definitely up from where they were for Graphic.

Thank you. The next question today comes from Adam Samuelson from Goldman Sachs. Adam, please go ahead. Your line is now open.

So I guess the first question is whether your exposure to private label, particularly in retail, might lead to challenges for some higher-end branded names as they raise prices and consumers shift to cheaper options. I’m trying to understand how your business in food and HPC looks concerning private label and whether there are any mix implications from the volume growth of those brands at the expense of some of the brands you carry.

Thanks for that, Adam. I guess I would answer it this way. I mean our customers that have announced earnings in the last couple of weeks talked about greater price elasticity than they've seen in the past. I mean, that's what they're currently experiencing. Relative to how that plays out through a recession, I guess what we try to do is build the Company to be a bit resilient in that regard. Remember, we had a slide that we showed at the Investor Day back in February that talked about 80% of what we do is brand and 20% is store brand or private label. That is a global comment. So we're kind of in all markets capable of handling that kind of a mix. And that would be kind of right on top of what you would see the normal distribution of branded versus private label. So, we're well-positioned to handle growth almost regardless of where it goes in terms of overall consumer demand. And that's purposeful on our behalf. We made a number of acquisitions over the last 10 years versus where we were even in '08 and '09, where we were more heavily indexed to branded to make sure that we build our operating model to be able to perform well in that kind of an environment, and that's, in fact, what happens.

Okay. That's helpful. I have a second question regarding Europe. I'm trying to understand the supply issues of paperboard in that region. It seems like there may be limited short-term flexibility to source additional paperboard from the U.S. due to capacity concerns. I'm also curious about how energy costs for European paper mills might influence pricing dynamics. Does the situation in Europe create a pricing advantage in the U.S. market because of these energy costs?

If you're looking at a relative competitive cash cost curve, the answer would be yes. North America is moving lower as a result of the impact of natural gas on a number of those grades. But in terms of your question around what that means for us in Europe, as I mentioned, our team kind of saw this coming and started in the fall of last year locking down tonnage to make sure that we had commitments to the paperboard mills that we buy from for tonnage to take care of customers. They did an excellent job making sure they were out in front of that. As I mentioned, we are paying more for that material. But it's embedded in our pricing and inflation assumptions you see here that we share. The customers actually pivoted more towards making sure that they have security of supply. Don't get me wrong. They don't want to pay more, but — ever. But they understand that that's the environment that they're in right now. More making sure they have the materials to make the products and keep polling products on the store shelf. I anticipate that that will continue to be the case through the balance of the year. We do import around 250,000 tons of our own material for the beverage business. But that is about the extent of what we're capable of doing right now just given the demand we've got here in the North American market. As I mentioned also, we're seeing, at least in the preliminary data for the first couple of months of this year that some of the imports are actually down year-over-year into North America. I would assume, although I don't know actually, that stuff is staying in the European market given some of the challenges they have and growth opportunities that are available to them. They're going to make more money in the European market than they will shipping it to North America.

And Adam, just to add one point to Mike's dialogue there. Given the inflation in Europe, whether it be natural gas or paperboard that we acquire, the pricing environment has become much more fluid. What historically may have been more annual agreements have turned into quarterly or monthly depending upon the relationship and the like. That's just been a reality of having to effectively manage through what is an unprecedented overall inflationary environment.

Thank you. Our next question today comes from Anthony Pettinari from Citigroup. Anthony, please go ahead. Your line is now open.

On demand trends for food service versus food and beverage and consumer, during the pandemic, we talked a lot about the Peter Tatter. Can you just remind us, is that sort of fully unwound now or normalized now? Or how might you expect those two end markets might perform over the course of the year just given the year-over-year comps and kind of the demand trends that you're seeing?

Yes. Thanks for the question. I'm actually happy to tell you that, as of this quarter, as I mentioned, our food service business is actually slightly ahead of pre-pandemic levels. So I'd say that we're more in equilibrium of where we would expect ourselves to be with growth on some of the plastic replacement, some of the other things that we've already talked about on the call, continuing to see our food and beverage business and food service returning back to that strong growth profile. We expect that over the next few years as mobility continues to improve that we would see growth in that vertical. So we're quite pleased with the positioning we've got relative to the end-use markets that we're servicing. Certainly going to take the vast majority of our focus and effort this year and into next year to make sure we deliver or exceed the commitments that we made on K2. That's a critical set of initiatives for us. We're off to a decent start. As we told you, if we were performing better, we would shut Battle Creek down sooner, which, in fact, is what we're doing. We're averaging somewhere, month-to-date, above 800 tons a day, are targeted for the machines, 1,500 tons. So we're two months and slightly ahead of our targets. Quality looks great. Our team has done a wonderful job. I just want to give a shout-out to them. It's a tremendous accomplishment for them to be able to pull off what they've done with COVID in the background over the last couple of years. Our hourly folks that are ramping that machine up are performing very well, too. So I'll give them a shout-out. We continue to run trials on fiber, as we told you at the Investor Day, to see if an FDD project for us makes sense. We don't have a project right now, but we're running those trials, and they continue to show promise. As we go forward here, we'll look at that potentially and then let you know if we come up with something that actually is a project there. It's all in the context, again, Anthony, of that 7% of sales CapEx and 20% EBITDA margins. I want you to think about that because that's really how we want you to model the Company going forward. If we do increase our capital spending, it will be also with us increasing our EBITDA margin targets because we expect those projects to have returns. Historically, Graphic has done a really good job along those lines. So that's how I'd ask you to think about it, focused on K2 ramp up this year. Beyond that, we continue to look at other things. And if we think we've got something, we'll bring it forward.

Thank you. The next question today comes from Arun Viswanathan from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

I would like to know the outlook for pricing in light of recent inflation and any potential market tightening. What pricing actions can we expect to see for the remainder of 2022, and how might that affect our outlook for 2023?

So Arun, you know we're not going to prognosticate around future pricing actions that we would take. Every one of the announcements that we've made have now been recognized in full, and we're implementing those through our roll-through on our contracts. Our backlogs are at 10 weeks. So, we'll continue to monitor that and make sure that we're making good decisions for the Company, but I'm not going to talk about future pricing actions on a call basis.

Understood. And then on the volume outlook, as you said, are you seeing anything, whether it relates to maybe substrate conversion, some of those paper seal and other new product managements you discussed, that would potentially help you increase your organic growth outlook? Or are we still kind of thinking about the 100 to 200 basis points as the right range?

Yes. Thanks for the question. Look, we've actually now, as I said in my prepared comments, beat our goal, eight out of the last nine quarters. So it's a logical question. Do you raise 100 to 200 basis points? What we've decided to do is just keep outperforming. I don't want to sound snarky here. But we actually want to get credit for the 100 to 200 basis points that we put out there. The fact we've been able to consistently beat that now for the last eight quarters in a row. Rather than try to put a higher goal out there, we're just going to keep performing. We believe that sooner or later, the markets will see that, and we will be rewarded for it.

Thank you. The next question today comes from Gabe Hajde from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

I wanted to ask about the guidance or the outlook, if you will, and thinking about a pretty strong start to the year. I know you don't give quarterly guidance. But if I look at the maintenance impact, and I think what you said, $80 million to $90 million of price realization. So the sequential incremental there will be, let's say, pick the midpoint, I don't know, $50 or so million. Q2 guidance, let's say, for EBITDA is in that $400 million to $405 million range. Appreciating the fact that it looks like price realization, I think, relative to when you last updated us at your Investor Day, we recognize a couple of price increases that were not in your outlook. It feels like things are tracking a little bit better maybe. So appreciating it's early in the year and there's some uncertainty, any reason why you guys aren't adjusting that pretty wide guidance range for us today?

Yes, Gabe. It's Steve. In terms of Q2, you're correct, we don't provide guidance, but we provide the components. You just set them back appropriately relative to where Q2 is likely heading relative to price/cost and relative to planned maintenance downtime. In terms of your question on the width of the range, we really felt like Q1, let's maintain this range of $200 million on the inflation front. We'll dial that in after Q2. Given the incredible uncertainty that we've seen, our mark-to-market today at $475 million is clear to us, but the mark-to-market has moved up every month for the last year, hence, the little bit of a wider range. I feel it's appropriate. It's prudent and gives us then the ability to navigate inside of that. We’ll talk about that specifically in July.

All right. And then I guess sort of a disclosure/point of clarification. Last quarter, you had given us tons, and unless I missed it, I didn't see that this quarter. So I know you've kind of talked to us about not focusing too much on a tonnage number. Just curious, I'm assuming that's intentional, and we won't be getting that going forward? So that's kind of question number one. And then number two, I guess as I think about rolling forward to 2023, and again, we can make our own assumptions about volume and price cost. But the other moving items would be a few extra million dollars of synergy realization from the AR Packaging acquisition as well as an incremental $50 million I want to say, from Kalamazoo. Are there other big ticket items that we should be thinking about?

We're a packaging company. What we really did herein with this set of reporting and we've added it in the supplemental materials is to provide new line of sight with our organic sales growth calculation, which was 3.3% this quarter. That calculation represents almost 90% of the Company. So, we felt like that was the appropriate tool to look to as we've talked about organic sales growth. We move it away from tons. As we talked at our Investor Day, we're now at acquiring 1 million tons of paperboard. We produced 4 million tons. In the quarter, that grew given the investments we’ve been making, particularly in Kalamazoo. As a tool to report against, we are continuing to make that pivot towards the integrated packaging company we are into the organic sales growth calculation. Relative to 2023, you're correct relative to the things that we were articulating. We've got synergies on acquisitions. We've got continuation of Kalamazoo. Those are both good examples of improvement initiatives that will be a part of our 2023 expectations. It goes to what Mike was just talking about a moment ago, all of those fit inside of the context of the goals and the march we have from today's EBITDA margins up towards 20% over the next several years.

Thank you. Our final question today comes from Kieran De Brun from Mizuho. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

I just had a really quick one in terms of the AR Packaging acquisition. Is there any color you can give us in terms of how we should think about the cadence of those $40 million of synergies over the next three years? And also, now that you've had a few months since the integration has begun, are there any kind of positive or negative surprises that you've experienced? If you could just touch a little bit in terms of the opportunities you're seeing from a cross-selling or co-product development perspective, I would appreciate it.

Yes, you bet, Kieran. It's Steve. I'll kick it off, and Mike can add some specifics. But the $40 million over a three-year period of time, with this 2022 being year one, pretty evenly over that period feels still about right for us. That being said, I think how it will come in, and Mike can add on to this, but I think we are very optimistic about what's possible relative to growth and commercial opportunities. There will be cost opportunities, and we'll manage through those and optimizing facilities. But I think our confidence in it is very high, and how it's likely to come in, maybe more growth-oriented in a positive way in addition to those natural things that we'll do on the cost side.

Yes, it's absolutely correct, Steve. I think, look, our confidence is high in the $40 million, and I would actually say it will probably be a bit indexed to 2023, quite frankly, given some of the opportunities and things that we're seeing in terms of the teams executing there. I don't want to overplay it. I talked about it in my prepared comments. But we expected the chemistry to be solid given the cultural backgrounds. Both companies are very similar. It's exceeded my expectations. They got done quickly to working on the real work. Of course, Europe is anything but easy right now. So that's a good crisis; sometimes, that helps the team gel together, and that's what we're seeing. In terms of geographic expansion, we've got a big book of innovation that's being opened up to those new customers, and they have the same for us. So we're leveraging that inertia, and that, again, was part of our hypothesis when we did the deal, and it's playing out the way that we expected it would. So, all in all, Kieran, we're off to a really strong start and fully expect to deliver on all the commitments that we made for the business acquisition of AR Packaging. I'd like to thank everybody for joining the call today. We look forward to talking to you again in July with our second quarter results. Have a great day.

That concludes the Graphic Packaging first quarter 2022 earnings call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.