Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Ichor's Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Claire McAdams, Investor Relations for Ichor. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining today's third quarter 2024 conference call. As you read our earnings press release and as you listen to this conference call, please recognize that both contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control and which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. These risks and uncertainties include those spelled out in our earnings press release, those described in our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2023 and those described in subsequent filings with the SEC. You should consider all forward-looking statements in light of those and other risks and uncertainties. Additionally, we will be providing certain non-GAAP financial measures during this conference call. Our earnings press release and the financial supplement posted to our IR website each provide a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures. On the call with me today are Jeff Andreson, our CEO, and Greg Swyt, our CFO. Jeff will begin with an update on our business, and then Greg will provide additional details about our results and guidance. After the prepared remarks, we will open the line for questions. I'll now turn over the call to Jeff Andreson. Jeff?

Thank you, Claire, and welcome, everyone, to our Q3 earnings call. We are pleased to report strong third quarter results with $211 million of sales, above the top end of our forecast, continued sequential improvement in gross margin and EPS of $0.12. Ichor's business model generates strong earnings leverage as revenues increase. And in Q3, we delivered operating income growth of more than 40% with 4% sequential revenue growth and nearly 30% gross margin flow-through from Q2. As we have progressed through 2024, our visibility for a recovery in the semiconductor process equipment market has become incrementally stronger each quarter. And we are very pleased today to be reporting upside to both our Q3 results and our Q4 outlook. Our second half of 2024 is currently expected to be 7% to 10% stronger than the first half in terms of revenues. Within this incrementally stronger revenue outlook and at the midpoint of our Q4 guidance ranges, we expect to deliver gross margin flow-through of over 30% and a 160% increase in operating income compared to the first half of 2024. Around this time last year, we made some refinements to our target financial model in which we increased our planned investments in R&D to drive more significant gross margin leverage. Our expected results for the full year 2024 are proof of strong execution on our key financial strategies. For example, we've increased gross margins each quarter through 2024 and expect additional improvement in Q4. For the full year, we expect to maintain similar SG&A levels as 2023, while R&D investments have stepped up by about 15% compared to last year. Most importantly, we are making excellent progress in our strategies to increase the proprietary content of our product portfolio. Before I review our specific progress qualifying new products, I'll briefly summarize our views on the customer demand environment. What's become much clearer since our August earnings call is that while overall WFE is expected to grow in 2025, the debate as to the magnitude of that growth has intensified. The majority of the headwinds impacting WFE growth expectations next year reflect lower estimates for lithography, China WFE, and trailing node investments. At the same time, the incremental tailwinds for 2025 growth are primarily related to growing investments in NAND, gate-all-around, and advanced packaging, all largely geared at supporting the performance requirements of leading-edge AI devices. These incremental tailwinds are all positive for Ichor's business and revenue growth profile. First and foremost, the WFE environment, as we enter 2025, is expected to reflect a greater level of etch and deposition intensity than we've witnessed over the last two years. An increase in the overall etch and deposition intensity of WFE is likewise going to equate to outperformance for the fluid delivery market and is clearly a net positive mix change for Ichor. The next tailwind specifically relates to expectations for a NAND recovery, which has recently endured the longest and steepest downturn in recent history. 2025's expected expansion of NAND WFE is aimed at technology upgrades to bring a greater proportion of the world's NAND supply up to the most advanced bit densities. These upgrades will be enabled by more fluid delivery subsystems, whether through bringing in more advanced etch and deposition tools or through upgrading the process chambers on the existing installed base. An increase in NAND spending is likewise a net positive mix change for Ichor. The next area of incremental confidence in spending growth is advanced logic, specifically gate-all-around. These device architectures require an increasing use of emerging applications such as selective etch, where we participate heavily in gas delivery systems, as well as increasing intensity for multiple deposition steps, including epi and ALD. Overall, a transition towards more advanced logic investments is also a net positive mix change for Ichor, mainly because it will drive increased etch and deposition intensity where we have a larger share of wallet. Furthermore, China WFE is expected to decrease in 2025. Given that WFE is expected to grow next year, this means that WFE outside of China will grow faster than the overall market. This is another net positive mix change for Ichor. While we certainly participated in the strong business environment enjoyed by US OEMs selling into China over the last couple of years, a significant portion of domestic China WFE is served by domestic China equipment OEMs. As the WFE mix shifts towards other regions in 2025, these will in turn lead to outperformance for US OEMs' revenue growth in this next cycle. Finally, the incremental growth in advanced packaging investments in 2025 is an additional tailwind, largely mitigating the incremental downticks in EUV expectations. While expectations for EUV installations in 2025 have come down, the build rates have remained fairly stable for Ichor throughout this year. So, at this time, we expect a similar to slightly lower level of revenues from lithography in 2025, and that these will be largely offset by our participation in advanced packaging applications and in markets outside of semiconductors through our subsidiary, IMG. To summarize our expectations of industry spending dynamics, the mix shifts of investment priorities in the coming year are, on the whole, very positive for Ichor's business, and regardless of the magnitude of WFE growth expected for 2025, we are confident in our ability to outperform the growth in WFE next year. Likewise, we are confident in our ability to demonstrate strong flow-through and deliver continued expansion of our gross margin profile as we enjoy a more robust customer demand environment in the coming year. Before turning the call over to Greg, I'll provide a brief update on our proprietary component qualifications that are now being installed on our existing gas panels as well as our next-generation gas panel. We continue to make steady progress closing our additional component qualifications and cutting them into our manufacturing pipeline. The growth in our new products this year is positively impacting our profitability, demonstrated by our performance, delivering gross margin improvement on similar revenue levels over the last few quarters. I'll start with our new component products, starting with fittings, which are used in our weldment products. Our fittings are now qualified at two of our customers, and we expect to complete a third customer qualification for our proprietary fittings in early 2025. The next component, now qualified at all three of our largest process tool customers, are our substrates used in our gas panels. In valves, we have been qualified for our high-purity valves at one customer and are currently in qualification at two additional customers. Fittings, substrates, and valves are all critical components used in the existing gas panels that we assemble as well as our next-generation gas panel. These components will continue to ramp in volume in 2025. Now, moving to our next-generation gas panel, we have now shipped over 30 of our proprietary gas panels and expect to ship an additional 25 by the end of the year. Most of these new gas panels are on our customers' evaluation tools that have been shipped to a device manufacturer. Our new gas panel contains about 80% proprietary Ichor content compared to 10% previously, which will drive significant expansion of our gross margin profile. These tool evaluations typically take about nine months to complete, so the earliest the initial evaluation will be completed remains late in the fourth quarter. During Q3, we were qualified on an additional application, bringing the total qualifications for our next-generation gas panel to four. In summary, I'd like to convey our confidence in our execution to date on these proprietary products and our confidence in their strong contribution to gross margin improvement as we move into a more robust spending environment. In combination with continued operating expense discipline, I'll remind everyone today that our business model and financial profile tend to generate significant operating leverage as revenues grow. With that, I'll turn it over to Greg to recap our Q3 results and provide further details around our Q4 financial outlook.

Thanks, Jeff. To begin, I would like to emphasize that the P&L metrics discussed today are non-GAAP measures. These measures exclude the impact of share-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, nonrecurring charges, and discrete tax items and adjustments. There is a useful financial supplement available on the Investors section of our website that summarizes our GAAP and non-GAAP financial results as well as a summary of the balance sheet and cash flow information for the last several quarters. Third quarter revenues were above the upper end of guidance at $211 million, up 4% from Q2 and 7% higher than the same period last year. Gross margin improved 60 basis points sequentially to 13.6%, which was slightly below expectations. While we continue to recognize the benefit of our internally produced products and improvements in factory efficiencies, these were muted by a strong mix of our integration products, which drove the upside in Q3 revenues. Q3 operating expenses came in slightly below forecast at $22.4 million and $500,000 higher than Q2. The increase from Q2 was due to the expenses associated with our ERP implementation projects. Our operating income for Q3 was $6.4 million. Net interest expense of $1.6 million was down from the Q2 expense of $1.9 million, reflecting a full quarter benefit of our improved leverage ratio. In Q3, we experienced higher foreign exchange losses than we expected. And at the same time, tax expense was lower than forecast, which completely offset the unfavorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations. The resulting net income per share was $0.12. Now turning to the balance sheet. In Q3, our cash and equivalents increased $2 million from Q2 to end the quarter at $116 million. We generated $8 million in cash flow from operations, reflecting the net investment in working capital during the quarter. Accounts receivable increased from the previous quarter on a higher revenue, and DSOs were 36 days. Inventory increased $8 million during the quarter to end the quarter at $239 million, and inventory turns increased to 3.1. Now, I will provide our guidance for the fourth quarter of 2024. With anticipated revenues in the range of $220 million to $235 million, we expect Q4 gross margins will again improve sequentially to a range of 14.5% to 15.5%. Looking forward to 2025, we expect to continue to see the benefits of our internally produced products and improvement in factory efficiencies to drive at least a 25% flow-through to gross margin on our incremental revenue growth. We expect Q4 operating expenses to remain similar to Q3 levels at approximately $22.5 million. Given our forecast for continued gross margin expansion and flat OpEx at the midpoint of guidance, we expect to achieve an over 80% increase in operating income from Q3 levels. Within the stronger demand environment expected in 2025, for modeling purposes, you should assume a 5% to 10% increase in annual operating expenses as we continue to invest in the development of our proprietary products and other growth initiatives. Net interest expense for Q4 is expected to be $1.5 million with other expense expected to be an additional $500,000. Given our paydown of the entire revolver balance in Q1, we have reduced our annual interest expense by half in fiscal 2024. For 2025, we should see a continued improvement in net interest expense as we improve our leverage ratios, and our current forecast for 2025 is for net interest and other expenses of $6 million. We expect to record a tax expense in Q4 of $300,000 given our full year non-GAAP tax expense forecast of $2 million. As you update your models for 2025 and beyond, the assumed effective tax rate is currently expected to be in the range of 12% to 15%. Finally, our EPS guidance range for Q4 of $0.21 to $0.33 reflects a share count of 34.2 million shares. Operator, we are ready to take questions.

The first question is from Craig Ellis from B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead.

Yeah, thanks so much for taking the question and congratulations on the revenue execution, guys. Jeff, I wanted to start just going back to some of the calendar '25 commentary. Just listening to some of the things that you were citing, I heard a little bit more NAND than I think I heard three months ago and maybe a little less DRAM. Did I hear that correctly? And as you think about the way the linearity of spending plays out next year as it relates to Ichor, any notable gives and takes that we should be aware of as we go through the year?

Thank you, Craig. I'll address all your points since you packed in quite a few. Regarding DRAM, we expect it to remain strong, particularly with high-bandwidth memory. Although we didn't mention it in our prepared remarks, we don't foresee any declines there. Additionally, even with some pullback from Intel, we anticipate that foundry logic will remain robust. I've always thought that NAND might begin to pick up in the second half of 2025, but we're already beginning to see some momentum a bit earlier than expected. This has been one of the significant improvements we've noticed since our last discussion, with our projections for the second half now reflecting an increase of around 7% to 10%, compared to the previous estimate of 4% or 5%. As we head into Q3 and Q4, we're seeing early signs of strengthening, which should carry over into Q1 as well. Our visibility remains similar to what it was three months ago, perhaps with increased confidence out to four months now instead of three. We're aligning well with our customer base, anticipating some NAND investment starting in the first half of the year. However, we are coming off a low base, and even into 2025, we may only reach about 25% to 30% of the previous peak, so it's still a positive trend. Regarding your four-part question about how we expect this to unfold throughout the year, we feel comfortable with the demand environment as we transition from this quarter into the next. I don't anticipate a significant increase or decrease in demand at this moment; I see them as fairly stable and expect progress throughout the remainder of the year.

That's real helpful. And then if I could ask a follow-up, and this one is for you, too, Jeff. Just a lot of meaningful progress with the proprietary content. As you look at 2025, what should we be thinking about in terms of either a particular contribution to gross margin or revenue as some of those products move more into production ramp? Thank you.

Yeah. So I would say the vast majority of it today and even into next year will still be internally consumed, mostly passive products. We talked about getting 55 gas panels out there. I'd remind you guys that we ship well over 1,000 a quarter. So it's inching up through the qualifications. But I think the large part will be the ones I mentioned around fittings, valves, substrates. Those are a large portion of the gas box, too. I would say the way to think about it is we're pretty comfortable with our 25 basis points improvement quarter-over-quarter. Even in a flat environment, I would expect that as we continue to grow that as you kind of work your models.

That’s great. Thanks, Jeff. Good luck, guys.

The next question is from Brian Chin from Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hi, there. Good afternoon. Thanks for letting us ask a few questions. Jeff, maybe to follow-up on NAND. So it sounds like that's starting to be a bit of a catalyst in terms of your revenue guide and some of your visibility into next year. I remember previously, you referenced how kind of the softness and the lack of recovery in NAND has kept some of these inventory levels a little bit higher at maybe one or two customers in particular. And so I'm wondering, is there even a lag still that you're sort of operating into? Or are you quickly seeing some of that inventory burn off, and then you're going to kind of shift to real demand as opposed to there being an inventory buffer there?

I believe there is no lag in gas panels; they are progressing as expected. I want to highlight that we are involved whether it's a refurbished tool or a new one that supports these technological shifts. However, I do think some components, particularly weldments, might experience a slight lag. They are still progressing, but not as quickly as we anticipated at this stage. That said, I am noticing some improvement in the machining area. It's difficult to pinpoint, but there is still a bit of an overhang, mainly linked to the NAND recovery, which seems to be gaining traction now. That said, we might experience a muted period over the next three to five months. It's hard for us to determine exactly since there are numerous part numbers involved on both sides.

Okay. Fair enough. And on sort of that initial visibility you provided on Q1, how it could maybe be at similar levels on a revenue basis to Q4, do you think at a high level, is that reflective of maybe that's kind of where a step down in China occurs, maybe not directly for you but indirectly relative to your customers? Is that kind of the messaging there? There are some pluses like you referenced earlier in terms of positive variables. China is more of a negative variable. Is that kind of what that suggests?

I would say that to a larger extent, some of it is due to the rebalancing of our lithography business from one quarter to the next, and it's important to note that we previously experienced a strong period for silicon carbide. I believe that will be subdued for another six months or so. To a larger extent, China will continue to represent a significant portion of wafer fabrication equipment, but, in line with other original equipment manufacturers, I expect it to decline slightly. However, I think some of the positive factors we discussed earlier will help counterbalance that decline.

One last thing. Regarding the positive updates you shared about progress with proprietary content initiatives, and the guidance you provided, I apologize if I missed it, but for 2025, is 25% incremental gross margins the right estimate, or do you think it could be even higher?

Well, you want to go ahead?

Yeah. Hey, Brian, it's Greg. Yes, as we said, we're continuing to see the benefit of our flow-through of at least 25%. So we continue to expect that. In fact, Q4 is a little stronger on flow-through from Q3 to Q4, more than the 25%. So I would continue to expect at least 25% as you do your modeling.

Okay. That’s great.

The next question is from Krish Sankar from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Hi, thanks for taking my question and congrats on the good results and guidance. Just for clarification on the NAND part, did you say that you're already actually seeing uptick in NAND WFE because of tech upgrades? Or is this more to do with more the inventory normalizing and that's helping pull through your gas panels for NAND? But actually, are you seeing true end demand pull-through?

We're seeing some gas panels. I wouldn't say it's the vast majority of anything, but we can tell when they're going into NAND. So there is some activity this quarter, but I think it's going to be stronger as we enter the first half of 2025.

Got it. That's very helpful. And then on the proprietary content, I can clearly see that helping gross margin. Would it actually help your gas panel ASPs and also unit market share? And if so, how to think about their share gains in 2025 or 2026.

I think the way I would think about that is we don't generally see large share shifts in the gas panel arena. But what I would tell you is some of these early applications we are on for the new gas panel are almost all incremental share gains. And so that will be helpful next year. But I don't suspect these will help the overall margin of the same gas panels that we ship today. It will just be a higher level of profitability with a very similar ASP.

Got it. Thank you, Jeff. Very helpful.

The next question is from Tom Diffely from D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Yes, good afternoon. Jeff, maybe just going back to Craig's earlier question about DRAM. I guess we thought it was going to be more of a discrete driver here in the fourth quarter and first quarter, but it sounds like from your comments, you just expect it to be relatively stable and strong.

Well, I guess I would tell you I don't know exactly. I'm talking about top level overall revenue picture. I'm not sure I have a view of DRAM, whether it's going to be stable or not quarter-over-quarter. I don't see anything pulling it back. I think most of what we see here and read is really around shortages really and most of the investments at the most advanced nodes for high-bandwidth memory. So I don't think that's going to pull back at all.

Okay. That's helpful. And then when you look at your new components, I guess, specifically the fittings right now, once they're qualified at two and then soon to be two, that is it, you can just put them on any of your systems?

I think generally we will support our entire weldment business with the vast majority of all fittings, unless there's a specific unique fitting provided by someone that we haven't designed our own for.

Okay. Great. And then any updates on some of the longer lead time products like the flow controllers?

I would say we're making pretty good progress. We've qualified another application. These evaluations, once they reach our customers, can take at least nine months, possibly longer. So we might see some early indications in late Q4. We're progressing and the number of gas panels is almost doubling from the first half of next year. We have a good view of next year's rollout and our targets. We're starting to pursue multiple applications and similar initiatives. However, I still believe it will be a significant inflection point in 2026.

Okay. And then last question for Greg. So when you look out nine months or a year when some of these second-generation gas panels are being delivered, at that point, do you think we have upside to our 25% incremental margin?

That is realistic, Tom, that we should expect to see that based on what Jeff mentioned regarding the stronger margins. Therefore, I would anticipate that as they become a larger part of our mix, low volumes won't significantly affect the overall results. However, we would expect them to contribute more than 25%.

Great. Thank for your time.

The next question is from Edward Yang from Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Hi, congratulations on a nice quarter. And it's really impressive to see the progress you're making on the proprietary product pipeline. You mentioned, Jeff, getting on another application up to four. I think in the prior quarter, you said you might see two applications, but it was over a three- to four-month time frame. I was wondering if that progress was on schedule or still on track?

I think it's on track. I don't recall everything I mentioned, but I know that we expected to get this one closed. There are a few other projects in the pipeline that we haven't discussed specific timing for, but they are also progressing well.

Okay. Are you seeing your customers also outsourcing more as you are growing faster than them and being exposed to the right PIC platforms?

I don't think they're outsourcing less. I think there are pockets where we're seeing kind of incremental demand to do some more, I'll call it, high-level assembly work for some of our customers. But I think in general, when you look at kind of our largest two customers, I think their strategy is pretty set. It's generally we're focused around the other two customers and some additional new ones as well. And so I think all of this bodes well for us to kind of outgrow the industry WFE projections for next year.

And just finally, I would love to kind of get your perspective. In the past, Ichor's growth curve coming out of a down cycle was very, very strong. Is what you're seeing today consistent with past cycles? How would you compare this recovery to others? There's obviously been a lot of bifurcation like China versus AI. Leaning on your experience, does this look different than in the past?

Yes, the answer is yes. One of the significant points, especially for those new to the story, is that coming out of 2019, we generated around $100 million off a base of approximately $650 million. A considerable portion of that $100 million in market share gains came from the final outsourcing of one of our customers, which will not happen again. Therefore, I would say the growth profile is going to be somewhat different. We experienced a 45% growth while the industry grew less than half that rate. A significant part of our growth was due to that outsourcing opportunity. Moving forward, we discussed that if the market grows by 10% year-over-year, we anticipate our growth to be around 15%. This is how we frame our outlook. We also aim to add new market share gains each year. Did I answer all of your questions?

You sure did. Very helpful. Thank you.

The next question is from Christian Schwab from Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead.

Great quarter everyone. Jeff, did I just hear you correctly? Did you say that you would outgrow WFE by 5%? That's the target goal based on your previous comment.

Yeah. We'll be somewhere in that neighborhood. We kind of look at the consensus out there now, which is, I would say, on our last call, might have been closer to 15%. It's probably in the high single digits, maybe 10% now. So we'd be comfortable with that level of outperformance. And then we'll certainly outgrow profitability given the proprietary products that were cutting it.

And then your enthusiasm on the NAND side, there seems to be a huge product transition going to 300 layer. Is there anything going on in the moly replacement portion of that as they move to 300 layer stacking? Is there anything about that, that benefits you or not really?

I believe we have a presence in moly today and will continue to have one in the future. As you know, there are likely three major customers pursuing that market, with one of them holding a significant share. I expect it will continue to grow, and I believe there will be additional applications that will benefit us as NAND recovers.

Great. No other questions. Thank you.

Thanks, Christian.

The next question is from Ross Cole from Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Hi, congratulations on the results, and thank you for taking my question. Earlier, you mentioned that there are some early applications for the new gas panel that are primarily new share gains. I was curious, with one of your competitors, you currently have about a 40% overlap of business with two of your large customers. Will that change going forward with this new generation and these new share gain opportunities?

I would say there are applications that were done with smaller gas panel manufacturers internally, so this will be new for us.

Great. Thank you. That’s all I had.

Okay. Thanks.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Jeff Andreson for closing comments.

I want to thank you for joining us on our call this quarter. I'd like to thank our employees, suppliers, customers, and investors for their ongoing dedication and support. We look forward to the opportunity to meet with investors at the New York Summit on December 17th and the Needham Growth Conference on January 14th. Please feel free to reach out to Claire directly to follow up with us. We look forward to updating you on our Q4 earnings call on early February. Operator, that concludes our call.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.