Good day, and thank you for standing by. And welcome to the Independence Realty Trust First Quarter 2021 Earnings Release Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. Thank you.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to review Independence Realty Trust first quarter 2021 financial results. On the call today with me are Scott Schaeffer, our Chief Executive Officer; Jim Sebra, our Chief Financial Officer; and Farrell Ender, President of IRT. Today's call is being webcast on our website at www.irtliving.com. There will be a replay of the call available via webcast on our Investor Relations website and telephonically beginning approximately 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time today. Before I turn the call over to Scott, I'd like to remind everyone that there may be forward-looking statements made on this call. These forward-looking statements reflect IRT’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Actual results could differ substantially and materially from what IRT has projected. Such statements are made in good faith pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Thank you, Lauren, and thank you all for joining us today. This time last year, we were faced with unexpected challenges brought on by the pandemic and were uncertain about the magnitude and impact of this crisis on our lives and our businesses. Since then, we have come a long way and now have a clearer view of the future, making us more optimistic about realizing our growth potential for the balance of this year and beyond. At IRT, we are encouraged by the strength of our portfolio and the progress made during the past 12 months, all leading to favorable demand trends at our properties. This demand is led by an acceleration in vaccine distribution, a healthier economic outlook, and favorable migration trends. We're clearly seeing the benefit of owning and operating properties in attractive non-gateway markets where there are notable near- and long-term growth drivers. Our focus on the Sunbelt region has proven to be the right strategy as the pandemic has reset how and where people choose to live, work, and play. Given this improving outlook and our strong market presence, we're very excited about the year ahead, and as a result, are raising our 2021 guidance. Jim will address this later on today's call. But to give you a sense of our optimism, we are raising the midpoint of our full year NOI growth guidance from 2.5% to 4.1 to 5%, a 65% increase. This encouragement is exemplified by another quarter of strong results. Specifically, in the first quarter, our same store NOI increased 5.3% and our core FFO improved to more than 23% compared to a year ago. Our same store average occupancy increased to 95.3%, a 260 basis point increase on a year-over-year basis. Our average effective monthly rent per unit grew 2.9% in the quarter, and we collected over 98% of first quarter rents and now have collected over 99% of our fourth quarter 2020 rents. And with favorable demand trends continuing, we are seeing strong results so far in April. Our total portfolio average occupancy is 96%, a 330 basis point improvement compared to April of last year. We have now collected almost 97% of April rent, which is consistent with collections at this point in March. And given our low lease expirations and high occupancy in the first quarter, we continue to drive rent growth, averaging 4.6% so far in the second quarter.

Thanks, Scott, and good morning, everyone. To echo Scott's comments, this has been an extraordinary year that challenged our team with unexpected circumstances. But due to the dedicated efforts and focus on revenue retention, we continue to report solid results and now a strong start to 2021. In the first quarter, our occupancy grew 260 basis points to 95.3% from 92.7% a year ago. This has continued in April with total portfolio average occupancy at 96%, up 330 basis points year-over-year. We've been able to achieve these levels while increasing our average effective monthly rent by 2.9% in the quarter. On a lease-over-lease basis for the same store portfolio, new lease rates increased 6.8%, and renewals were up 4.8% during the first quarter, using a combined lease-over-lease rental rate increase of 5.9%. Strong trends continue in the second quarter to date with new leases having increased 9.6% led by our value-add communities, while renewed leases are up 3.7% with a blended lease-over-lease rental rate increase of 4.6% for our same store portfolio.

Thanks, Farrell, and good morning, everyone. Beginning with our first quarter performance update, net income available to common shareholders was $1.1 million, up from a net loss of $372,000 in the first quarter of 2020. During the first quarter, core FFO grew to $18 million, up 23.5% from $14.6 million in Q1 2020. Core FFO per share during Q1 was $0.18, 12.5% higher than Q1 last year at $0.15 per share. As we highlighted earlier this year, we changed our definition of core FFO during the first quarter so that our definition is more consistent with industry norms. Our definition of core FFO now includes the impact of stock compensation expense and the amortization of deferred financing costs. To help with this transition, we've updated all of the historical periods in our financial statements and supplements to follow this new definition. Turning to our same store property operating results, NOI growth in the first quarter was 5.3%, driven by revenue growth of 5.6%. This growth was driven by 250 basis points of higher average occupancy and a 2.9% increase in average rental rates. While this NOI growth includes value-added communities, we did see NOI growth of 2.5% at our same store non-value-add communities. Again, this growth is driven by 170 basis points of incremental occupancy and a 1.7% increase in our average rental rates for the first quarter compared to last year. With regard to rent collections, they have continued to be strong despite the persistence of the COVID-19 pandemic and extended eviction moratoriums. Today, we have collected 98.4% of our first quarter billings. Consistent with last year, we evaluated uncollected amounts for collectability and recorded a reserve for bad debt for those amounts we deem uncollectible. As of today, we maintain a bad debt reserve of $1 million associated with $1.5 million of gross receivables outstanding at quarter end. As a result, we have a net receivable balance of $500,000 and believe that they will be collected in the near term.

Thanks, Jim. In closing, I want to highlight how encouraged I am by our strong start to the year. This reflects our team's continued efforts to provide well-managed quality homes to our residents while continuing to strengthen our balance sheet. We want to again thank our team for their hard work and dedication and thank you for joining us today. We hope you all stay well and look forward to speaking with many of you at Nareit’s virtual weekly conference at the beginning of June. Operator, we would now like to open the call for questions.

And your first question comes from the line of Neil Malkin with Capital One Securities.

First, you mentioned the progress on the JV side or press side, three letters of intent, three deals. Can you just maybe talk about that, how that progressed? Maybe appetite for total size and what the breakdown is between, I guess, JV developments versus preferred or mezzanine opportunities?

So our appetite hasn't changed. We're still looking to limit the investment in this type of programs to $100 million. And we've entered into, as I said, three LOIs for new construction communities in our target markets where we have management capability. We think at returns and with ultimately purchase options that are going to be very attractive. So again, this program is meant to use a limited amount of our capital today to build a pipeline of future acquisitions in the markets where we want to grow.

You're doing preferred lending on those development deals, is that what you're saying, or am I not…

These are joint venture relationships but there will be preferred investments in this program as well.

But these three are basically just JV equity essentially for the development, correct?

Yes, correct.

And the other one maybe on the operations side, I have been hearing a lot about out-migration from the coast and your market being the clear beneficiary or beneficiaries. Can you talk about what you're kind of seeing on the ground or from your property managers in terms of in-migration? Have you seen consistent and steady increase since, call it, earlier middle of last year from a percentage of people from out of state who have signed these new leases, kind of how to think about what that looks like on the ground?

Anecdotally, I mean, when you're in the market, everybody's talking about it. It points to seeing Northeastern license plates more so in the market. When we look at the data, it's been fairly consistent over the past year. So our Carolina properties are really seeing the majority of it. It's about 6% to 8% depending on the community of inflow from the New York, New Jersey, PA markets, but we're watching it very carefully.

And then just to be clear the deals you have on the contracts, the acquisitions, the two deals, that’s separate and apart from the three LOIs, so that's incremental?

Yes.

Your next question comes from the line of Austin Wurschmidt of KeyBanc.

I wanted to ask Jim on the preferred equity development joint ventures, you mentioned, again, on the $56 million. Can you provide some additional detail on the markets, the details are located there? And what is the structure of the joint ventures, are the developers contributing the land or will they have additional equity in the deals?

The three deals break down; one is just outside of Richmond; one is in Austin, Texas; and one is in Nashville, Tennessee.

Should we consider these as potential new markets for entering and scaling, as it seems this program could serve as a future pipeline for acquisitions? What are your thoughts on adding more markets?

Yes, Austin, that's correct. These are markets that we targeted. These are markets where we've looked at a number of opportunities and just have not for a number of reasons, and the main one being pricing, has jumped in. But through this program, we think it will give us the foothold and allow us to build out in the future.

And what was the structure, again, in terms of the joint ventures? I mean, are they 50-50 joint ventures initially or something else? Can you provide any detail along those lines?

The joint venture involves a developer providing the land, which has already received approval and met all zoning and regulatory requirements. This developer is also adding digital equity to the project. While I don't have the exact percentages at this moment, I believe it's around 80-20. The developer is financially invested and aligned with our goals. What we appreciate about this program is that the project is nearly shovel-ready, so construction can start as soon as we finalize the closing.

And then just last one from me, on the new acquisitions you mentioned in Dallas in Charlotte, I think you said these were lease-up deals. Is the 4.5% in the initial cap rate? And if so, what do you expect upon stabilization and the timing of stabilization?

So they are lease-up deals. The Dallas property is in an area where we already have three other assets very, very close by. And again, I look at this as defensive as much as offensive in that I wanted to control this new construction, this new delivery, rather than having somebody else come in. And it's also a market that's been very strong and seeing tremendous growth, so we're excited about that. The other property in Charlotte is a little bit different. We've been looking to grow in Charlotte. It's an infill location, very, very well located and we got comfortable with the new construction investment here. Because we think in this area, even though this one is new construction, it will not have a lot of competition from additional deliveries in the future. So one of the benefits, obviously, is being the B Class investor is that we were insulated from deliveries. And I look at this acquisition almost a little bit as a contrary view where everyone else is running now to buy the Bs and driving down cap rates. We were able to find a brand new delivery in a very well-located area that should be insulated from new competition because of where it is and at a much better price than these…

And in regard to the cap rate, that's a year two stabilized tax-adjusted cap rate.

And so what sort of on-going basis, were you stepping in?

It's right around four. It will be taking about 70% occupancy, taking about four to six months to stabilize.

Next question comes from Nick Joseph with Citi.

This is Michael Griffin on for Nick. Just curious, your occupancy this quarter remains above the total average. Are you seeing a better ability to push rents as a result of this and are you seeing better pricing on the new or renewal side?

Well, we're definitely seeing better pricing on the new side, because we have the value-add program, which is generating very healthy returns. And on the renewal side, there has been very good demand. We're seeing our renewal rate continually increase since the third quarter of last year and we will push rents where we can. We do have more lease expirations in the second and third quarters by design. So we were taking that into consideration with renewal rates. But we expect to continue to drive rates and drive them in a very healthy way as long as we can do that while still keeping occupancy in that 95% to 96% range.

Are you seeing any markets where you're able to push rents more so than others?

Atlanta has been a really strong market for us over the past couple quarters, and that this as you can see on the results.

Just one more for me. Obviously, you announced the ATM program last fall. Wondering what appetite there was, if any, for deleveraging through a larger equity base?

We look at that constantly but we have no plans at this point to raise equity to delever. If you look at where we were a year ago, leverage was 9.2 times, so we're a full turn below that even through the pandemic while still driving the best portfolio returns in the industry. So just through organic growth without new acquisitions or other equity, through organic growth, we expect the leverage to be in the 7s by year end. So we have no appetite at this moment to raise equity to delever.

Your next question comes from the line of John Kim of BMO Capital Markets.

You increased your guidance pretty sizably ahead of the peak leasing season? I was wondering what surprised you the most so far this year relatively to your initial projections just a couple months ago?

Well, I mean, I don't know if it was a surprise. When we corrected our initial guidance, it was before the vaccine was being distributed. There was still a lot of unknowns with where the economy was going to be in 2021. So as we look at it today, we felt it’s prudent to rethink what the balance of 2021 will look like. We did it still with erring on the side of caution or conservatism. But as we look through the balance of the year, we feel that the guidance that we put out is reasonable and again, with an eye on or erring on the side of conservatism. So there are still some unknowns. I mean, the eviction moratorium is still out there. And we don't know if that will be extended beyond June, and we don't know how many residents may want to take advantage of that. Right now, we have about 100 residents who are deferring their rent because of the moratorium. We don't expect that to grow, but that's something that we don't control.

I know the data is less than a month, but you had new leases, accelerating growth and renewals slowdown. How should we read into this? Are the new leases driven by market strength or your renovation programs, and where disproportionate amounts of both leases coming that were signed? Or what should we take out of that?

So we feel that until this pandemic and this crisis is over for good that the strong occupancy is the best way to protect the portfolio and continue to deliver results like we have. So as we look forward at our lease expiration schedule, again, it is skewed towards the second and third quarter during leasing season. We're adjusting our renewal rates in order to make sure that we're maintaining occupancy in that 95%, 96% range. On new leases, once the unit is vacant, we're out there and you want to drive as much rent as you possibly can, or once you know it's going to be vacant, actually say, or the tenant is going to leave. And it’s also helped dramatically by the value-add program. I mean, the value-add program, we're getting 18% to 20% premiums over expiring leases; you know that's very powerful from a rent growth perspective.

In relation to Scott's comments about lease expiration, we observed a similar number of leases in April as we did in the first quarter. Given the pandemic, we need to be very aware of the occupancy drive and the number of leases that are expiring this quarter.

On the JVs, I know you probably don't want to go too much into detail. But you quoted the unlevered IRRs at 20%. And I'm wondering if you could break that down between the current income component versus fees or promotes and cap appreciation?

John, I don't have that in front of me, but I'll grab that and give you a call back with it.

But do you expect the yields are then completely paid in cash or in equity?

We certainly paid in cash. I'll follow up with you on the specifics.

And your next question comes from the line of Amanda Sweitzer of Baird.

Following up on your capital allocation, kind of nice improvement in cost of equity seen. Can you just provide an update on how you’re ranking your sources of capital today between disposition, incremental leverage, and then additional equity issuances?

I mean, we continue to stack our kind of capital. Obviously, we have retained revenues that we are funding back into the business through the value-add. And then we kind of look at dispositions given the high cap rate or the low cap rate with the high pricing as another good source with kind of equity costs being the lower ranking one.

And then as a follow-up to that, what kind of cap rates do you think you could achieve today for some of the assets that you're targeting for disposition or at least what spread could you achieve on capital recycling between the buy and the sale?

I mean, we're seeing in the market, like I mentioned in the call, sub 4% cap rates on some of the value-add deals. So I would think 4% right now is the market across the other markets that we’re in.

And then last one from me, you focused recently on some of the newer construction acquisition today, which I got given value-add cap rates. But what levers are you looking to pull to drive value as you're underwriting those deals, or where do you see your competitive advantage with some of those newer deals? Is it some of the clustering benefits that you talked about or is there any other areas that you think you can drive value?

I mean, I think it's a combination of what Scott said and that the Dallas deal, I think you can definitely leverage the communities that we have in that submarket. Same thing in Charlotte, it's within a seven-minute drive of a community that we already have in that market. But we really feel like these are typically direct relationships and we're getting a slight discount to market to take up what we feel as a minimum lease-up risk. So that's where we think most of it's going to be driven from.

And your next question comes from the line of John Massocca of Ladenburg Thalmann.

So given the kind of investments that are under contract are obviously kind of Class A new developments, and your new build is where the JV and kind of preferred investment program is going to focus. I mean, what is the runway you think left for value-add projects within the portfolio today and maybe within the platform at least over kind of the intermediate term?

Again, we have markets that we haven't even started value-add in; I’ll point out Indianapolis and Oklahoma City. So I think there's still a decent amount of opportunities within the lease portfolio. We are still looking to acquire for that purpose. I mean, we built out an incredible platform. I think our cost to renovate is probably the lowest among our competitors. It’s just challenging in this market to find ones that fit but we're still looking into the markets that we have built out these teams and to try to add to that in addition to what we have in the existing portfolio.

And then specifically on redevelopments but also maybe on kind of maintenance CapEx as well. I mean, are you seeing any pricing pressures given some of the movements in your cost of lumber, appliances, etc.? And how successful have you been in maybe offsetting that with kind of rental rate increases?

We have not seen cost increases; I mean, we're not really exposed to lumber with the renovations we're doing. I mean, it’s really flooring and, to your point, appliances, we haven't seen that much pressure on appliances to date. And granite or quartz countertops are the main components of our renovations. I mean, labor is the biggest thing right now. If you were going to ask me what the challenge in doing renovations is finding quality labor.

And I guess is that impacted kind of expected ROIs on budget and new redevelopment?

No, I mean, we've created a pretty good machine. So we're actually seeing costs come in a little bit because we're getting more efficient. And we'll continue to see, over the next couple of quarters, I think you'll see an increase in the returns on the renovation costs.

And your next question comes from the line of Neil Malkin with Capital One Securities.

I have a question regarding the valuation of your stock and the broader market. Considering current cap rates and investor demand, as well as potential hurdle rates or internal IRRs from all stakeholders, do you believe it is reasonable to suggest that your stock should be valued even higher, perhaps due to cap rate compression or multiple expansion? This is in light of the developments in your markets and the untapped potential for value creation and NOI growth.

Well, I think if you look at cap rates in the market, clearly, one could conclude that our share price is undervalued. There's always this talk of the public company discount. But we have a very compelling story and lots of opportunity for growth. And to Farrell's point, have built an operating platform here, it is very strong and is scalable. So when you put all that together, one wonders why there is a public company discount rather some private sector. But with cap rates where they are, our implied share price should be higher.

The last question is about the joint venture. Will you be calling the 20% equity, and are you receiving fees for asset property management? Also, do you plan to take it out after stabilization, or will you operate it in a joint venture structure for a certain number of years before doing so?

Our program is where we have the right to purchase on each transaction, and our plan would be to purchase it at completion and of course, manage it from that point. There won't be any management until there's deals.

And there are no further questions at this time. And I'll turn the call back over to management.

Well, thank you all for joining us today and we will speak to you again. Some of you at Nareit’s REITweek and the rest in three months. Have a good day.

And this concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect at this time.