Hello, and thank you for being here. My name is Regina, and I will be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the Jones Lang LaSalle Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. I will now turn the conference over to Sean Coghlan, Head of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to the Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. Earlier this morning, we issued our earnings release along with a slide presentation and Excel file intended to supplement our prepared remarks. These materials are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Please visit ir.jll.com. During the call, as well as in our slide presentation and supplemental Excel file, we reference certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe provide useful information for investors. We include reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP in our earnings release and slide presentation. We also referenced resilient and transactional revenues, which we defined in the footnotes of our earnings release. As a reminder, today's call is being webcast live and recorded. A transcript and recording of this conference call will be posted to our website. Any statements made about future results and performance, plans, expectations, and objectives are forward-looking statements. Actual results and performance may differ from those forward-looking statements as a result of factors discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K and in other reports filed with the SEC. The company disclaims any undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. Finally, a reminder that percentage variances are against the prior year period in local currency, unless otherwise noted. I will now turn the call over to Christian Ulbrich, our President and Chief Executive Officer, for opening remarks.

Thank you, Sean. Hello, and welcome to our third quarter 2025 earnings call. This morning, we reported strong results with our sixth consecutive quarter of double-digit revenue gains and eighth consecutive quarter of double-digit adjusted EPS growth reflecting the strength and resilience of JLL's diversified platform. At the consolidated level, revenue grew 10%, adjusted EBITDA increased 16%, and adjusted EPS was up 29%. Top and bottom line growth was led by a reacceleration in our Transactional businesses after market recovery, which began building momentum late last year and further progressed. Transactional revenue grew 13% in the quarter, led by 26% growth in investment sales, debt, and equity advisory. Though the macro environment remains dynamic, the economic outlook and forward indicators for Transactional markets have stabilized and improved during the quarter. Both occupier and investor clients are motivated to transact. Looking at our largest market, the U.S. This was reflected in broad-based activity across Capital Markets, office and industrial leasing, as well as an improvement in large deal activity. Investors in particular are increasingly shifting to risk-on mode supported by healthy and robust debt markets. We continue to invest in the people and platform to drive long-term revenue and margin growth across our resilient business lines, positioning each of them for sustainable, profitable growth. The result of our investments was evident in the seventh consecutive quarter of double-digit revenue gains in real estate management services. Data, technology, and AI are central to JLL's overall strategy, differentiated platform, and financial performance. We continue to create a suite of impactful and transformative technology products that drive revenue growth and increase the profitability of JLL, anchored in both an AI-forward approach and one that enables us to deliver the most valuable outcomes for our clients. Over the past six years, we have accelerated the pace of innovation at JLL. Today, our platform is driving significant value by enabling the core businesses. Our people and clients are leveraging our data technology and AI to derive unique insights, informed decision-making, and drive productivity. We were an early adopter of generative AI in our industry and are now building Agentic AI capabilities into our products to address complex problems and needs. We are scaling rapidly across both adoption and frequency of use. More than 41% of our addressable population are now using our proprietary AI tools daily, up from 35% weekly adoption earlier this year. We would not have been able to achieve these milestones if not for the combination of our people, global footprint, and culture. Of our broader technology suite, the direct revenue-generating software products and our Technology Solutions business comprise the Software and Technology Solutions segment. The segment allowed JLL to incubate a portfolio of revenue-generating products including Corrigo and Building Engines, primarily serving clients in our Real Estate Management Services business. Since being formalized as a segment in 2022, Software and Technology Solutions have matured strategically and operationally, and the segment has meaningfully progressed in its path to be profitable in full year 2026. Given its maturity and focus on serving clients in our real estate management services businesses, effective January 1, Software and Technology solutions will run as a fifth business line within the Real Estate Management Services segment alongside Workplace Management, Project Management, Property Management, and Portfolio Services. Going forward, this new structure will allow us to further scale the business, align on the most effective and client-centric go-to-market approach, and fully realize top and bottom line synergies. With that, I will now turn the call over to Kelly Howe, our Chief Financial Officer, who will provide more details on our results for the quarter.

Thank you, Christian. I'm pleased with our third quarter results overall, highlighted by an acceleration in top line growth, robust profit and margin increases, and strong free cash flow generation. The revenue growth, which came on the back of a tougher comparison, reflects the strength of our platform and people as well as the continuation of our strong momentum in driving client success across multiple services. Growth was led by our Transactional businesses, which outpaced a slight deceleration in resilient revenue growth that was in part the result of our active decision to exit certain contracts that didn't align with our desired long-term margin profile. Our profit growth materially outpaced the increase in revenues despite headwinds from a few discrete items. We continue to invest to drive long-term growth in the context of the ongoing market recovery and long-term secular tailwinds for our industry. At the same time, we remain very focused on enhancing our platform leverage and see ample opportunity ahead to drive further margin expansion. Now a review of our operating performance by segment. Beginning with Real Estate Management Services, client wins and mandate expansions continue to drive strong performance in Workplace Management as incremental pass-through costs augmented mid-single-digit management fee growth. On a two-year stack basis, Workplace Management revenue increased nearly 30% for the quarter, consistent with the prior four quarters and reflective of both the value we bring to clients and the significant market opportunity. New and expanded contracts, largely in the U.S., Australia, and India, drove double-digit Project Management revenue growth with low double-digit management fee growth, supplemented by higher pass-through costs. Within Property Management, revenue growth was tempered by the anticipated elevated contract turnover we mentioned last quarter. The overall segment revenue growth, along with a notably lower gross receipts tax expense, more than offset headwinds from the favorable prior year impact of incentive compensation accrual timing and certain discrete items, leading to higher adjusted EBITDA and margin. Looking ahead, we remain confident in the trajectory of the Workplace Management business as our sales pipeline is strong and contract renewal rates are stable. Given the time to onboard new business wins and as we lap tough comparisons, the near-term growth is likely to moderate. Within Project Management, client activity remains healthy, positioning us for continued momentum into the fourth quarter. In Property Management, we anticipate the elevated contract turnover we are actioning to continue to dampen revenue growth through the middle of next year, offset by an improved margin outlook. From the segment overall, we continue to target healthy annual margin expansion, though the quarterly progression is not likely to be linear as we balance investing to drive long-term growth and profitability with near-term business performance. Moving next to Leasing Advisory. Revenue growth accelerated despite a tougher comparison. On a two-year stack basis, Leasing revenue grew nearly 30%. Growth was broad-based across major asset classes led by office with continued momentum in the U.S. Globally, office leasing revenue growth accelerated to 14% and notably outpaced the 2% increase in market volume, according to JLL Research, highlighted by U.S. outperformance from both higher volume and deal size. Industrial leasing revenue grew 6% globally, driven by continued strength in the U.S. The increase in Leasing Advisory adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by Leasing revenue growth, mostly offset by the year-over-year impact from the timing of incentive compensation accrual. Absent this phasing impact, the incremental margin would have been much closer to our historical norm, which we continue to target on a full-year basis. Looking ahead, we entered the fourth quarter with a healthy Leasing pipeline as client demand for high-quality assets continues. Business confidence, as measured by the OECD, has been resilient over the past year in the face of a dynamic macro backdrop, providing reason for cautious optimism for continued growth in the near term.

Shifting to our Capital Market Services segment, growth trends accelerated across each business line, most notably within Debt Advisory, Investment Sales, and Equity Advisory. Strength in debt markets and an improvement in bidder dynamics drove a 47% increase in Debt Advisory and 22% growth in Investment Sales on the back of more challenging comparisons. On a two-year stacked basis, Debt Advisory revenue grew 68% and Investment Sales increased 37%. The increase in Capital Markets Services adjusted EBITDA and margin was largely attributable to the higher transactional revenues, partly offset by the $7.2 million of incremental expenses associated with loan-related losses. The majority of these expenses were related to the closing of the loan where fraud was associated with the borrower that we discussed in prior earnings calls. Looking ahead, our global Investment Sales, Debt and Equity Advisory pipeline remains strong and we are encouraged by the highly liquid capital markets, increased fundraising activity, and improving bidder momentum. The strength of our differentiated data-driven global platform positions us to continue to gain market share globally.

Turning to investment management. Revenue growth was driven by higher incentive fees. Strong growth in our U.S. core open-end funds mostly offset the impact of the large client asset dispositions in fourth quarter 2024, resulting in largely unchanged advisory fees from a year ago. We've raised $3.4 billion of private equity capital year-to-date compared with $2.7 billion for the full year 2024, reflecting continued strong demand for credit and core strategies. Capital raising and valuation increases led the sequential quarter increase in assets under management. As it takes several quarters to deploy new capital, we expect a gradual recovery in advisory fee growth over the coming year. Moving to Software & Technology Solutions. Double-digit growth in software revenue was mostly offset by reduced discretionary technology solutions spend from certain large existing clients. We remain focused on attaining sustained profitability of our direct revenue-generating technology businesses. And as an extension of Christian's earlier remarks, driving closer alignment as well as top and bottom line synergies between our technology products and core businesses. Of note, we no longer include carried interest in the segment performance and have recast historical financials accordingly. Shifting to free cash flow, balance sheet, and capital allocation. The higher free cash flow in the quarter was largely due to improved collections and earnings growth. Year-to-date free cash flow achieved its highest level since 2021 and in part reflects our ongoing efforts to drive working capital efficiency and improve upon our long-term average free cash flow conversion ratio of 80%. Our free cash flow generation contributed to a reduction in net debt, which, along with higher adjusted EBITDA over the trailing 12 months, led to the improvement in reported net leverage to 0.8x. We continue to manage to a full-year average leverage ratio of 1.0x, the midpoint of our 0 to 2x target range. Capital deployment priorities remain focused first on driving organic growth and productivity across business lines. Our acquisition pursuits remain focused on augmenting organic initiatives that enhance our capabilities and deepen our client relationships across multiple business lines, particularly within our resilient businesses. Returning capital to shareholders remains a high priority. In the quarter, share repurchases totaled $70 million, bringing the year-to-date total to $131 million, notably above expected full-year stock compensation dilution and full-year 2024 repurchases of $80 million. Looking ahead, we intend to continue to at least offset annual stock compensation dilution with the total repurchase amount depending on the broader operating environment, other M&A or investment opportunities, valuation, and leverage outlook. Regarding our 2025 full-year financial outlook, the market backdrop overall remains constructive despite mixed economic indicators in the evolving policy environment. Given our strong year-to-date performance, pipeline, and underlying business trends, we increased the low end of our full-year adjusted EBITDA target range by $75 million, resulting in a new range of $1.375 billion to $1.45 billion. Additionally, our consistent progress in margin expansion and focus on operating efficiency has put us on track to achieve this year the low end of our midterm adjusted EBITDA margin target range. This is in line with our original timeline provided in November 2022 and consistent with our expectation of achieving the margin ahead of the top line target, reflecting our continuous commitment to drive stakeholder value. Christian, back to you.

Thank you, Kelly. Back in 2017, we communicated our Beyond strategy backed up with a financial target for 2025. Since then, we have demonstrated a consistent ability to both raise and achieve our margin targets as a company. As we near the end of 2025 and approach our midterm target margin range, we are actively developing the next evolution of JLL's strategy, charting the path to top and bottom line growth to 2030 and refreshing our financial targets, which we will share with you all during the first quarter of 2026. We are encouraged by improving tailwinds for our industry as well as the opportunity to fortify and scale the contributions of our resilient and transactional businesses. There's significant runway ahead for our company to continue to drive long-term value creation. I would like to once again thank all of our colleagues around the world for their resilience and collective focus on delivering for our clients and shareholders. We're excited to continue building an even stronger leading business with you all in the years to come. Operator, please explain the Q&A process.

Our first question will come from Anthony Paolone with JPMorgan.

My first question revolves around Property Management and REM, just more broadly. You talked about moderating growth there, and I just wanted to make sure I understand. Was that for the broader business segment? And can you put some brackets around what that means? And just also what is the reason for the churn in Property Management and what's kind of the drag there?

Anthony, it's Christian. As we explained, we have taken our Property Management business into a global business line last year, and we are evaluating now all the different country businesses, the profitability of those businesses, and we are really focused on driving margin in that business. And so we are getting out of some of those contracts, most notably in Asia Pacific. So when you look at the overall growth ratio, it is muted, but there are still areas, especially here in the U.S., where we still show nice single-digit growth in that business.

So I guess if we move away from Property Management and just think more broadly around traditional outsourcing and facilities, is there any real change in what's happening with the growth rate there?

No, not at all. That business is still striving ahead very strongly. As you saw, we had really strong growth in the quarter, and our Project Management business was up 24%, and our Workplace Management business was up 8%, and we see that continue going forward, as we have said multiple times. This is a long-term trend, and we don't see any kind of barriers to that trend. So what you see within the Property Management business, it's still a result of us taking a very localized business within JLL now into run as a global segment, and we have seen just contracts, which we don't want to pursue longer term, but these are all pretty much exclusively down in Asia Pacific.

Yes. Thanks, and maybe I'll just layer a couple of thoughts on top of that. For our Facilities Management business, as Christian noted, we do expect continued growth over the medium and long term. That's, of course, not linear. And just given the timing of some contract ramping and things like that, we do expect a little bit of moderation on top of some particularly strong comps in the prior year as well over the next couple of quarters. On the Property Management side, as Christian noted, we are taking a hard look at a set of contracts and intentionally making choices in order to drive margin. We expect that process to continue through the first two quarters of next year as well, at which point we expect to have turned the corner on that and be looking at a more global basis, a positive growth outlook.

Okay. Got it. And then just my follow-up is just as it relates to free cash flow, it seems like the conversion there is tracking, and you're just inside your leverage target. So just trying to bridge the buyback and whether or not that ramps up more dramatically in the next couple of quarters or not?

Well, as you have seen, we have ramped it up already in the third quarter, and you can probably assume that this is describing a bit of a trend. Leverage ratio is now very low. And as long as we don't identify any really strong M&A opportunities, which will add immediate value to our shareholders, we will continue to see the repurchasing of our shares as a very attractive use of our cash.

Our next question will come from the line of Stephen Sheldon with William Blair.

Christian, on your Agentic AI solutions, I guess as we think about that from an investor standpoint, where could we start to see some of these solutions impacting financials? Is it a combination of both producer productivity gains that could help top line growth along with efficiency gains and the cost structure? And then is there any detail you can share on where you've seen the biggest benefit so far as you look across the organization?

Yes. For the time being, the main benefit is around efficiency gains. What we are doing is we are going thoroughly through all our processes within the organization and define those processes, if possible, move those processes in one of our shared service centers and then within the shared service centers within a couple of months, they are trying to replace some of that by using AI tools in order to take those efficiencies up. And that goes across the board that is within our support services, but it is also within our business lines. So we see productivity, for example, going significantly up in our Capital Markets business where the revenue per head is going up very significantly. And it's not only because the market is more supportive, but we have a whole load of tools that are supporting our brokers to drive their efficiency.

Got it, very helpful. Regarding Capital Markets, how are you viewing trends as we move into the crucial fourth quarter? While deal closings can always affect when revenue is recognized, we believe you have a good sense of what to expect based on the time it takes to finalize deals. How are you approaching this? What have you estimated for your guidance this year? Additionally, what does the pipeline look like as we look ahead to 2026?

Well, as you have seen, the pace of growth accelerated in the third quarter quite significantly. And there is good momentum while we moved into the fourth quarter, and frankly, we don't see that changing. The healthy bit about that is we don't see a hockey stick recovery. We see a very steady recovery of the capital markets transaction volumes in the U.S. but also around the globe. And so overall, our outlook for that business is very positive.

Got it. Good to hear. Can I ask one more question? I might be mistaken, but I believe this is the first time in a while that the assets under management were supported by modest valuation increases. Does it seem like we may have started to see a bottoming out of commercial real estate valuations? I found that really interesting.

Yes. Indeed, what we have seen is that we have had a small increase in underlying value. So we should read that as that the values have bottomed out, and we are now going on a slight increase again going forward. Overall, the outlook for that business is healthy. Specifically, within our own organization, we had a strong equity raise in the third quarter. As you know, that will then translate over the coming quarters into more assets under management and so it's a very predictable and therefore, a nice income stream for us.

Our next question comes from the line of Alex Kramm with UBS.

Just maybe coming back to the first questions on the Property Management and the exiting. If I heard you correctly, Christian, you said that this is primarily in APAC and the U.S. still grew mid-single digits. So if I heard the mid-single digits correctly, without being disrespectful, that still sounds like a pretty soft number. So just wondering if some of the kind of changes are also weighing in that business? Or if there's anything else going on and what do you think the growth of that business, once you get through all this, could ultimately be again?

I don't think I said 2%, if I'm not mistaken. I said mid-single-digit growth in the U.S. So not that, that is super exciting, but it's at least more than 2%. So the decline is coming from the overall decline is coming from APAC only.

Okay. And in terms of whether the business could ultimately be in terms of growth, again, sorry if I misheard you, but mid-single digits, like you said, is still probably upside to that over time?

Yes. I mean, we have higher ambitions than that. But just when you bring a business like this together, there's a lot of structural work to be done. And we don't want to get ahead of ourselves. We want to deliver exceptional services to our clients. And so you have to be mindful of how much new business you are taking on in a period like that. And we are very focused that we are getting to the right clients and delivering that outstanding service, what they would expect from JLL while we do that restructuring within that business.

Okay. Fair enough. And then secondarily, just quickly on industrial leasing, it sounds like good increase. But if I look at that slide that you have on it still fairly much below where we were in the last few years. So anything that you're observing to get kind of back to normal in that business? Yes, any trends you can share?

Yes, I can take that one. Industrial leasing actually performed better than we would have expected. Our Leasing revenue globally in industrial was up 6%, up 9% in the U.S. The U.S. number comes on the back of very strong growth in the first half. I wouldn't read too much into kind of a quarter-by-quarter change. We feel really good about the pipeline. The other thing that I would just note is that if you look at our industrial leasing growth on a two-year stack basis, we feel really good about that performance relative to the overall market performance.

Our next question comes from the line of Jade Rahmani with KBW.

Capital Markets historically is the industry's highest margin business. I remember HFF margins were always in the 25% range. So how much upside in margins do you expect that business to have? And if you could put any parameters around it and say, the near to medium term, that would be great. I see a lot of opportunity to further scale that business.

Thanks, Jade. I'll take that one. We don't provide, as a reminder, kind of segment-specific margin outlook. That said, given your question, we see a lot of upside in that business as well. As a reminder, as we went through kind of the downturn over the last couple of years, we really did not let go of our producers. And so we maintained that very strong cohort of producers, and there is more productivity within that cohort that we believe we could achieve. And then to your point, there is a lot of leverage on the platform in that business. And so we see plenty of runway for margin expansion in our Capital Markets business.

On the multifamily loss, we've now seen multiple real estate services companies take broad charges and increase their reserves. Greystone, which is owned in joint venture by Cushman & Wakefield, had large charges. So I think that in your comments, you alluded to one instance of fraud, which was a legacy issue. It didn't sound like the charge was related to newly uncovered issues. So could you provide any commentary around the credit trends in multifamily and the context for that charge?

Sure. So we actually had two loans with confirmed fraud. So one of those loans, we completely closed out this quarter, the loan with the enhanced loss sharing that we've spoken about in prior quarters completely closed out in the third quarter, a very, very small portion of the charge was associated with closing that out. There was a second loan with confirmed fraud as well, that as you will recall, we repurchased from Fannie. The underlying property and loan was sold in October 2025. We believe that's in very good standing at this point. We did take a portion of the charge to cover the sale of that property and loan. And then we just have normal course of business. We're constantly evaluating the portfolio of loans. And so we adjust our CECL reserves quarter-over-quarter. There can be volatility in those CECL reserves quarter-over-quarter just depending on what we're seeing in the macro environment and with specific loans. And so a portion of the charge was associated with the CECL reserve change. If you look at our CECL reserve, again, like I said, that can be volatile quarter-to-quarter. We took a bit of a charge this quarter. But if you look at it on a trailing 12-month basis, we're up $700,000 in net CECL reserves.

Okay. So that sounds fairly modest to me and not indicative of broader deterioration. So is it safe to assume most of these charges related to the fraud instances?

Yes. It's about a little more than half is associated with the two loans that we previously discussed.

Our next question will come from the line of Mitch Germain with Citizens Bank.

The low-margin contracts that you're exiting, is this happening as the contract concludes? So is it safe to assume that we've got a couple more quarters and then that they all burn off? Is that the way we should think about it?

That's exactly right. So as we've gone through and done a pretty intensive portfolio review in our Property Management business. As we noted, we've identified some contracts that just don't make sense for us over the medium and long term. It takes a bit of time to exit those contracts. There are a lot of people associated with them. As you know, we want to make sure that there is a smooth exit from any situation where we've been actively serving a client. And so I would expect continued contract churn, again, very intentional in the Property Management business probably through about the first half of next year.

Got you. That's helpful. And then Christian, maybe broadly speaking, I know that there is some really good momentum across fundraising and also your investment sales business. But we're hearing about some pullback from institutions in terms of their real estate allocations. Are you seeing any of that with regards to your discussions and across the board with your customers or your talent?

To be honest, not really. As we discussed earlier, in the second quarter, we noticed some hesitation from overseas investors regarding the U.S. market, but that has since improved, and they are now returning to their longer-term investment allocations across different geographies. We are seeing strong interest from Asian and Middle Eastern investors looking to increase their real estate allocations. Overall, I don't believe there are any significant changes to the long-term trend, which shows roughly 12% allocated to real estate. However, the challenge may lie in the shortage of available properties in the market. New construction is at a very low level, making the scarcity of institutional-grade products more apparent, and this is one reason why prices for the best properties continue to rise.

Just as a follow-up, are you suggesting that you think the cross-border capital allocation is going to start to improve?

Directionally, yes. Especially when you look at relative attractiveness, there were some hopes that Europe would come out of the woods faster, which hasn't materialized so far, and therefore, the relative attractiveness of the U.S. has increased over the last couple of months, and we can immediately see that by the interest from overseas investors to invest in the U.S.

Our next question comes from the line of Julien Blouin with Goldman Sachs.

Yes. I guess first just on margins. I mean, Leasing top line growth is strong, but I guess the incremental margins were relatively subdued. I think you called out the timing of incentive compensation accrual timing. I guess just taking a step back, does it feel like the compensation environment for leasing brokers is getting more competitive and making it may be more difficult to realize some of the incremental margins we would otherwise expect?

I think the market for talent is always competitive, to be quite honest. We continue to feel really good about our broker talent. We get a lot of interest, and we have a lot of stickiness around the brokers that we do have because of some of the investments that we've made in the platform we provide. Similarly, on the recruitment side, we get a lot of people who are quite interested in coming over to JLL because of the platform investments we've made. I don't see retention and recruitment as a significant headwind to profitability in the Leasing business or incremental margins.

Got it. Okay. And then maybe stepping back, just margins more generally, do you still feel like you're on track to get to your sort of midterm margin targets that you've touched on in the past? I think there were sort of 16% to 19%. And also, is the plan when you sort of come up with these 2030 targets to update those sort of margin targets as well, and more generally, I guess, why sort of persist with giving these longer-term targets when the longer-term visibility can be challenging in your business?

So on the first part of your question, we do believe that we are on track to achieve the lower end of those margin targets that we had put out in 2022. So we feel quite good about that. Christian, perhaps I'll turn it over to you to talk about kind of the 2030 targets and longer-term visibility.

When we did the work for our strategy up to 2030, we were very encouraged when we went into the detail of the different service lines how much organic growth opportunity we are able to identify and you pair that with the opportunity AI is offering to our industry, which will help us to become even more efficient and on a continuous basis going forward. So I think we have good reason to believe that the margin trend, which we have shown over the last couple of years will continue going forward.

Our next question comes from Seth Bergey with Citigroup.

I kind of want to go back to your comments on AI. How does it change the way you think about kind of your current headcount needs and your future headcount needs across kind of the business?

Well, as you will have observed, our overall headcount is still growing, and we expect that to continue to grow, but that is very much driven by on-site colleagues who are working directly on the build environment of our clients. We also have a very strong growth of headcount within our shared service centers, because the more you are able to define processes, you are able to move them into centers of excellence. Where we see a more flattish development around headcount is in our front offices, because the people working in those front offices are so strongly supported by the technology which we are offering that they are all becoming significantly more productive in what they are doing.

Okay, great. I would like to revisit the comments regarding the growth of the REMS business. For clarification, in the previous call, you mentioned expecting organic revenue growth in the high single-digit to low double-digit range. Is the reference to growth in the Asia Pacific, described as high single digits, specifically for Project Management revenue, or does it apply to the overall REMS business as well?

That comment referred to our historically termed Work Dynamics business, which is experiencing growth in the high single digits to low double digits. With the addition of Property Management to the REMS segment, the overall growth leans towards the high single digits, although the impact is not significant. It contributes roughly 1% to 1.5% to the overall growth rate while we work on restructuring that business. As Kelly mentioned, this process will take a few quarters, but we expect to see growth return in the second half of next year. In the long run, we do not anticipate that the Property Management business will hinder the overall growth of the REMS segment.

And just to clarify, it's our Property Management business where we are seeing some intentional contract churn, not the Project Management business.

And that will conclude our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the call back over to Christian Ulbrich for closing comments.

Thank you, operator. With no further questions, we will close today's call. On behalf of the entire JLL team, we thank you all for participating in the call today. We look forward to speaking with you again following the fourth quarter.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.