Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the MSCI Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session, where we will limit participants to one question and one follow-up. We will have further instructions for you at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Salli Schwartz, Head of Investor Relations and Treasurer. You may begin.

Thank you, Operator. Good day, and welcome to the MSCI third quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing our results for the third quarter 2020. This press release, along with an earnings presentation we will reference on this call, as well as a brief quarterly update, are available on our website, msci.com under the Investor Relations tab. Let me remind you that this call contains forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made and are governed by the language on the second slide of today's presentation. For a discussion of additional risks and uncertainties, please see the risk factors and forward-looking statements disclaimer in our most recent Form 10-K and in our other SEC filings. During today's call, in addition to results presented on the basis of U.S. GAAP, we also refer to non-GAAP measures, including, but not limited to organic operating revenue growth rates, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA expenses, adjusted EPS, and free cash flow. We believe our non-GAAP measures facilitate meaningful period-to-period comparisons and provide insight into our core operating performance. You'll find a reconciliation to the equivalent GAAP measures in the earnings materials and an explanation of why we deem this information to be meaningful, as well as how management uses these measures in the Appendix pages of the earnings presentation. We will also discuss run rate, which estimates at a particular point in time, the annualized value of the recurring revenues under our client agreements for the next 12 months, subject to a variety of adjustments and exclusions that we detail in our SEC filings. As a result of those adjustments and exclusions, the actual amount of recurring revenues we will realize over the following 12 months will differ from run rate. We therefore caution you not to place undue reliance on run rate to estimate or forecast recurring revenue. Additionally, we will discuss organic run rate growth figures, which exclude the impact of changes in foreign currency and the impact of any acquisitions or divestitures. On the call today are Henry Fernandez, our Chairman and CEO; Baer Pettit, our President and COO; and Andy Wiechmann, our CFO and Chief Strategy Officer. Finally, I would like to point out that members of the media may be on the call this morning in a listen-only mode. With that, let me now turn the call over to Henry Fernandez.

Thank you, Salli. Hello everyone, and thank you for joining us today. My colleagues and I hope you and your families are remaining safe and healthy. During the third quarter, and despite the challenging environment for our clients, MSCI had strong financial performance, including total revenue growth of nearly 8%, run rate growth of 11%, adjusted EBITDA growth of 13%, and adjusted earnings per share growth of 31%. MSCI continues to play a central role in helping investors build better portfolios for a better world. We are executing our mission in two key interrelated ways: creating indices that serve as underlying components of client portfolios, and equipping our clients with the essential ingredients for them to build their own optimized portfolios. Indices as underlying components for client portfolios include benchmarks for active managers, replication tools for index managers, and underlying indices for listed futures and options, restructured products, and OTC derivatives. These indices can cover a very wide spectrum of client portfolio construction needs, from equities to fixed income, from market cap weighted to ESG and climate overlays, and from factor models to thematic mega trends. Consequently, indices as underlying components have a vast number of use cases and therefore, our business opportunities in this area are enormous. The essential ingredients to equip our clients to construct their own optimized portfolios include our factor, risk and performance models, our ESG ratings and screenings, our climate metrics, and value and risk models and tools for thematic and mega trend exposures. Across these two interrelated offerings, we see incredible opportunities that expand into new product areas, new client segments, and new capabilities. New product areas include fixed income, ESG and climate, and thematic investing, to name a few. New client segments include wealth management, corporates for ESG offerings, and insurance companies for fixed income offerings. New capabilities in support of our new product areas and new client segments include enabling technology and the strategic partnerships that we're exploring in a wide variety of different areas. In my comments today, I will focus on opportunities in four new product areas, including ESG and climate, fixed income and liquidity, thematic investing, and derivatives. In future calls, I will comment on all the areas of strategic focus for MSCI. I'll start with our ESG and climate franchise. This quarter, it reached a run rate of $192 million, growing nearly 50% year-on-year. Approximately $15 million of this run rate relates to climate and has grown over 100% year-on-year. We continue to firmly believe there will be a large-scale reallocation of capital and repricing of financial assets over the next few years. Climate change, the move to a low carbon economy, diversity and inclusion in the workplace, and other environmental, social, and governance shifts will deeply impact where capital is invested. MSCI is uniquely positioned to deliver the solutions to navigate these massive shifts. Specifically in the ETF marketplace, we continue to see the launch of new ESG and climate equity ETFs linked to MSCI indices. At the end of the third quarter, assets under management in these ETFs have grown an incredible 186% year-on-year, reaching $71 billion. Our acquisition of Carbon Delta a year ago has also helped us to supercharge our climate capabilities. We now offer climate value at risk for investors across multiple asset classes, including most recently for real estate investors. As you can see, we're aggressively expanding our capabilities in ESG and climate, and we'll continue to build on our established leadership in this space. Our fixed income franchise continued to grow this quarter as our strong position in ESG and climate enabled us to capture more opportunities. AUMs and ETFs that are linked to Bloomberg Barclays MSCI ESG fixed income indices ended the third quarter nearly $12 billion, more than doubling from a year ago. During the quarter, we launched 22 MSCI proprietary equity income indices, including eight ESG and climate change indices. With this launch, we now offer the market a total of 40 MSCI proprietary fixed income indices across ESG, climate, factor, and custom-weighted. As you can see, our strategy in fixed income is to partner with other index providers including Bloomberg, Barclays, iBoxx, iTraxx, and others, as well as launch our proprietary indices. In fixed income, we have also seen great progress with our liquidity analytics. We and our partner IHS Markit are delivering solutions that help investors understand and manage fixed income liquidity risk. This has been critical for investors to meet growing regulatory requirements. MSCI has already been well positioned to support our clients with ESMA liquidity regulations in Europe that went into effect in the third quarter. Looking forward, we're also favorably positioned to help clients with potential liquidity reporting requirements in other jurisdictions around the world. Another product area of strategic focus for us is thematic investing. MSCI has built partnerships with Ark Invest and a number of other experts specializing in thematic investing. These relationships have generated indices focused on disruptive innovation and long-term structural changes or mega trends. We are seeing excellent traction across a range of use cases, from ETF licensing to structured products, which Baer will discuss. Finally, I will comment on derivatives. We continue to drive the strong growth of multi-country, multi-currency MSCI index derivatives. This is a massive opportunity in its own right, but it will also reinforce this trend of our index franchise for both active and index investing. We're experiencing great success with these partnerships in this space with some of the world's most prominent global exchanges. Additionally, we're seeing tremendous opportunity to license our indices to broker-dealers and banks for the creation of OTC derivatives and structured products. These efforts reinforce the virtuous ecosystem around MSCI exchange-traded products. Before I turn the call over to Baer, I am excited to announce we're planning a virtual Investor Day event for February 24 next year. Please hold that morning on your calendars. We'll have additional event details for you over the coming weeks. We very much look forward to sharing with you the many significant opportunities MSCI has to serve our clients' needs globally and to grow with the investment industry's strong underlying secular trends that create tremendous shareholder value opportunities for us. We will talk about our expansion plans in products and client segments and the capabilities we need to build to capitalize on this significant potential. To make the event as complete as possible, we will continue our active dialogue with all of you and all of our investors, including through surveys and listening tours. We look forward to hearing your views on how we can continue to optimize the MSCI franchise to achieve even greater shareholder value. Let me now turn the call over to Baer.

Thank you, Henry, and greetings everyone. I'll start by noting an exciting milestone for our Index segment, which reached $1 billion in run rate for the first time. We achieved this through growth in both the new product areas that Henry discussed and more established products like our market cap weighted indexes. Across MSCI, we continue to find many opportunities to produce content and define multiple uses for it to address a number of different client needs. I'll give a few examples within some of the product areas that Henry highlighted. Leveraging our broad ESG and climate content has enabled MSCI to contribute to further transparency and standardization in ESG disclosures. In September, we launched a tool to help investors evaluate their portfolio exposures and alignment across the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Our real estate climate VaR service has gained immediate traction with several new sales during this quarter. This combines our real estate data with climate change-related calculations to create new value for real estate investors. An added benefit to the launch of real estate climate VaR is that many of our real estate clients now view MSCI in a new and innovative light. As a second example, this quarter we launched a new suite of MSCI Fixed Income Climate Change Indexes, which leverage our existing data in ESG and climate and apply them to fixed income benchmarks. These indices enable institutional credit investors to build more climate-resilient portfolios. They also allow investors to implement strategies that consider opportunities and risks associated with the ongoing transition to a lower carbon economy. Another product area we have frequently referenced on these calls is the re-licensing of existing MSCI indices for the creation of listed and OTC derivatives and structured products. As an example, this quarter we saw new OTC product creation from our broker-dealer clients in the form of total return swaps on our ESG Leaders indexes. This activity was soon followed by the establishment of new positions in listed derivatives on MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Leaders futures. We believe the potential for further growth in the ESG derivative space is very strong. Another great area for derivatives growth is thematics. Earlier this year, I mentioned we were working with a partner on a series of thematic indices focused on the important areas of innovation in genomics and robotics. During this quarter, we want to license with the European Bank for a new OTC swap based on an MSCI thematic index related to the circular economy and renewable energy. This swap is expected to drive structured product issuance in the region and is another good example of the MSCI-linked derivatives opportunity. As of the end of the third quarter, run rate for exchange-traded futures and options contracts linked to MSCI indices was $49 million, growing over 60% year-on-year. We see significant potential in this space and believe that the opportunity could represent hundreds of millions in revenue several years from now. Just as we are leveraging our content for multiple use cases, we're actively pursuing an open architecture strategy to push that content to clients through a variety of distribution channels. Earlier this month, MSCI ESG ratings were introduced on Bloomberg Terminals, which are already a major distributor of our index data. Clients now have another ready mechanism to incorporate MSCI ESG ratings into their portfolio analysis and investment processes. MSCI has adapted quickly and well to the remote working and virtual engagement model. In the third quarter, across the company, we drove over 10% subscription run rate growth. This result reflected strong contributions from across our client base, including both established and emerging client segments. MSCI’s client-centric approach has provided ongoing benefit not just to sales, but also to the retention of our existing business. MSCI’s overall retention rate for the third quarter was 94.5%, improving approximately 100 basis points compared to the second quarter. The analytics retention rate had a notable improvement, increasing 180 basis points sequentially and 20 basis points year-over-year. Our team's creativity and dedication to solving problems for clients have been critical as global engagement models continue to evolve during the ongoing pandemic. We have previously spoken with you about our senior account manager and key account manager programs to engage with the C-suite level executives of our largest clients. These clients collectively represent 65% of MSCI’s total run rate, and the retention rate for those clients was over 96% in the quarter, clearly demonstrating the power of our focused and integrated client approach. I'm encouraged by these milestones and look forward to keeping you updated as we continue to make progress on our key growth areas. Let me now turn the call over to Andy, who will discuss more specifics of the financial aspects of our quarterly performance. Over to you, Andy.

Thank you, Baer, and hello to everyone on the call this morning. As I step into the CFO role, I'm excited to lead our talented finance organization and reengage with our shareholder and analyst community. I’ll be especially focused on further aligning strategy and finance to deliver even greater value to our clients, our employees, and our shareholders. As Henry and Baer have noted, the third quarter was another quarter of strong execution for MSCI. Operating revenues grew nearly 8%, and recurring subscription run rate grew over 10%, reflecting solid performance across the business. Assets under management in equity ETFs linked to MSCI indices ended the third quarter at $909 billion. This reflects strong cash inflows of nearly $27 billion across all geographic exposures during the quarter. Over 75% of these inflows were allocated to ETFs with international exposures, which is a reversal of the trend we saw in the first half of the year. Approximately $7 billion of the inflows into MSCI-linked funds went into U.S. exposure funds, where we continue to have strong market share capture of flows driven by continued flows in the ESG and factor products. In fact, equity ETFs linked to MSCI ESG and Climate indices experienced cash inflows of $11.4 billion during the quarter. Additionally, AUM levels were supported by improvements in equity market levels with $57 billion of appreciation from the end of the second quarter. As an update since the third quarter, as of October 21, assets under management in equity ETFs linked to MSCI indices have further improved to approximately $942 billion. I'll now review our asset-based fee revenue results, which were up 4.5% year-on-year, reflecting higher results across the board, including from ETFs, non-ETF products, and futures and options. Sequentially, the nearly $117 billion improvement in quarterly average AUM levels in equity ETFs linked to MSCI indices aided in driving 15% higher asset-based fees from ETF products versus the second quarter. The average basis point fee on equity ETFs linked to MSCI indices remained unchanged quarter-over-quarter at 2.67 basis points. A proportionally higher mix of AUM in international exposure funds provided support to maintain this level. Additionally, asset-based fees from futures and options increased sequentially, with results reflecting improvements in the economics we received from our exchange partners. I'll now turn to our adjusted earnings per share growth year-over-year. Underlying business performance drove nearly half of our $0.52 improvement in adjusted EPS. This included both operating revenue growth and relatively flat year-over-year expenses. As the expense controls we put in place earlier in the year, as well as continued benefits from lower travel and entertainment expenses, largely offset our ongoing investment initiatives. The balance of the adjusted EPS improvement was primarily driven by a lower tax rate in our third quarter and year-to-date repurchases of MSCI shares. The lower tax rate in the quarter was primarily due to a change in estimates as regulations were released relating to 2017 tax reform. Turning to our balance sheet, we continue to have strong confidence in our capital position and liquidity. Client collections have been healthy. As you've seen from our results, investors continue to turn to MSCI for mission-critical tools. This strong liquidity position affords us the flexibility to continue to be highly opportunistic in pursuing our capital allocation strategy, as we've done in the past. During the quarter, we completed nearly $207 million of share repurchases and returned over $65 million in dividends to our shareholders. Since the end of the quarter and through October 23, we've repurchased an additional $51 million of our shares. Before we move to Q&A, I will highlight some of the changes to our outlook for full year 2020, which we announced in our earnings release earlier today. We now expect adjusted EBITDA expenses to be lower for full year 2020 in the range of $710 million to $730 million. Our expense outlook reflects lower expenses in areas like travel and entertainment, as well as the impact of the continuation of Triple-Crown investments that we are pursuing as the environment stabilizes. Our continued investment in these Triple-Crown opportunities could result in an uptick in expenses relative to the last couple quarters. We also expect a lower effective tax rate for 2020 in the range of 11.5% to 13.5%. Our adjusted tax rate should run approximately one percentage point higher than our effective tax rate as it has year-to-date through the third quarter. CapEx will now be in the range of $50 million to $55 million. For free cash flow, we now expect to be in the range of $650 million to $700 million, primarily reflecting stronger cash collections. Full year interest expenses remain expected to be approximately $158 million. However, as we've pointed out to you before, the ongoing low rate environment is also likely to drive quarterly interest income earned on cash balances to be at similar levels to this quarter for the foreseeable future. From where we stand today, the sales pipeline remains strong and client engagement remains robust and dynamic. Nonetheless, we remain cautious given that the operating environment remains unpredictable. With just a couple of days to go before the U.S. elections, as well as the backdrop of the ongoing pandemic, the range of outcomes in global markets and the operating environment remains broad. In any case, we continue to believe our durable all-weather subscription-based business model will hold up well as it has to date. We therefore remain focused on continuing to support our clients, innovate, and ultimately drive forward MSCI’s growth algorithms, creating compounding value for all of you. And with that operator, please open the line for questions. Thanks.

Our first question comes from Manav Patnaik with Barclays. You may proceed with your question.

I just wanted to ask how you guys were thinking or how we should think about this new wave of, I guess, consolidation that's starting to happen also or at least be talked about a lot in the press with the large asset managers or your big clients. And I was just hoping, you know, you could help us understand how we should react to some of these as they get announced?

Yes, Manav. Hi, good morning. It's Baer here. So look, I think that our experience in this is somewhat mixed and certainly not as negative as it might look on the surface. So first of all, the consolidation has not been that large this far. And so far, as we have seen some cancellations notably on an index related to it. As a general rule over time when firms consolidate, we sometimes have initially a little bit of a negative hit, but then typically we're able to grow the combined company larger in very healthy ways. So as of today, we're not seeing a significant impact, and as a general rule, historically the outcomes have been pretty positive over time.

And if I could just ask around the investments back in March, April when you guys obviously cut some in response to the COVID pandemic. How are those investments doing today? Are they coming back, are they still on hold, I guess potentially in that space and further lockdowns? Just curious how you're thinking about the conflict levels and going through with some of these investments?

So the first thing that it's important to note, Manav, is that the set of opportunities that we have to solve for clients' problems is very significant. And it has actually increased very largely since the start of the pandemic. Obviously, we can point to ESG as an example, but also in fixed income as well in thematic investing. Obviously, the pandemic and the economic dislocations have created significant changes in the way industries are structured and the business models. And the likes of those shifts can get reflected in some of these mega trends, and the emphasis that we're putting on that thematic mega trend investing in order to create indices and structural products and things like that. So the number of opportunities has increased. Now, at the start of the pandemic, like everyone else, we reigned in a bit the base of investments that we had; a few months later, say two, three months later, we felt very comfortable with where we stood in the financials of the company and the outlook we were seeing. This increased demand for our products and services, and therefore we have stepped up on the renewal or rebasing of that investment program. Some of that increased hiring and increased investment is reflected in the EBITDA expenses in the third quarter, obviously offset by the decline of expenses in marketing and travel and entertainment, and a lot of things due to the lockdown. But we did see a pickup on that. We will likely see an increased pick up on that in the fourth quarter and in 2021 because we feel that these significant opportunities that the operating environment is presenting to us need to be capitalized with a lot of new products and a number of new client segments and a lot of new capabilities in the company. So yes, the investment plan continues but it is a few percentage points below where we wanted it to be at this point. But we're stepping up significantly on increasing it.

Our next question comes from Alex Kramm with UBS. You may proceed with your question.

Just quickly on the retention rates, nice pickup quarter-over-quarter, as I think you had hoped for. But still I think on a year-over-year basis, I think cancellations are still a little bit elevated. So just would be interested to hear some comments; is this pandemic related? You made, obviously, some comments around asset management, M&A; I think it's a little too soon for that. But anything else that gives us confidence that cancellations will continue to particularly lower out from here?

Yes. Hi, Alex. Baer here. Yes, so I think the simplest way to answer your question is we're sort of continuing the guidance from last quarter. We are doing everything we can to service our clients. We are in an environment that is still a bit choppy and noisy in various client segments. There can be some consolidation, as Manav mentioned. There can be some certain client-specific events. So directionally, we're clearly pleased with what happened this quarter. We're going to keep trying to do the best we can to keep the retention rate as strong as possible. But we are in circumstances where the market and what is happening to our clients may put a little pressure. So hopefully, in the balance of all that, we'll get some good outcomes, and that's what we'll be working towards.

And then a second one also quick one here on the asset-based fees. You know, the ETF numbers are pretty self-explanatory. But can you talk a little bit more about the other two components on the, I guess, index mutual fund side? Surprised to see that pick up quarter-over-quarter? I think that's usually on a delayed kind of like charging and I think 2Q was obviously a bad quarter. So surprised to see that tick up quarter-over-quarter. And then on the futures and options, wondering how much there were any sort of one-time fees related maybe to the Hong Kong Exchange coming online, anything that may not be recurring because there was an outsized quarter again here on futures and options?

Hi, Alex. It’s Andy. Good morning. Maybe to start with the second question first on that the futures and options run rate. As we noted in our remarks, we are benefiting slightly from improved economics from our exchange partners, most notably in Asia versus the prior quarter. I would highlight that we continue to be very optimistic and excited about the broader derivatives opportunity. Even though we saw volume tick down quarter-over-quarter, we are seeing big opportunities in both the listed derivatives market as well as the over-the-counter market, which is showing up in more index recurring and non-recurring revenue side. On the non-ETF passive front, I would highlight it's more than just index-based mutual funds. Actually, a meaningful component of the revenue we see there is coming from what we call institutional passive revenue. And so it's more dynamic than just the index mutual fund trends that you might be seeing more broadly. If you highlight, we tend to recognize revenue on a quarter lag, where we depend on our clients to report to us average AUM levels. And usually we get those AUM levels reported to us on generally a quarter, but it can be sometimes more than a quarter. And so it's not a kind of direct quarter lag correlation if you will. The other thing I would highlight is it's a very dynamic equation where we can see some positive movements in price, particularly in some of the big growth areas like institutional passive mandates for ESG indexes or custom indexes or factor indexes, where in many instances we might have more attractive economics in those types of indexes. So long winded way to say that it is a very dynamic equation, and there is some relationship related to AUM moves in the prior quarter, but it's much more complex than that.

Our next question comes from Toni Kaplan with Morgan Stanley. You may proceed with your question.

Thank you. Henry, I wanted to ask a broad question on ESG. The market's been growing really nicely; you grew your ESG and climate run rate at 46% this quarter and continue to be the first mover there. Could you just talk about what you view as your most important differentiators and how you've been able to build on those? I think the question that I get a lot is how MSCI can keep the number one position as more competitors try to grow in the space. And so, if you could just talk about what differentiates your data capabilities on the index side relationships, anything you want to add there? Thanks.

So, Toni, the competitive advantages that we have on ESG and now, obviously, a major step up in climate change tools are significant; a multitude of competitive advantages. As I indicated in my prepared remarks, a lot of what we do at MSCI gets captured in two big interrelated trends. When we take all of our capabilities and put them into indices, which form underlying components for portfolios on one hand, and on the other hand, provide all the ingredients, the essential ingredients to build portfolios by our clients themselves from scratch so to speak. So on ESG, think about all the capabilities we have. We are the largest rating agency in the world for ESG, so we provide a huge amount of ratings on an instrument or investment-by-investment basis. So all of that then gets captured. We're the largest cross-border equity index provider in the world, so we can combine the ESG ratings with the equity indices. We're now putting all of that ESG information that we get into risk models, with which we're the largest provider of equity risk models in the world. So we can monetize on that. We are putting all that together into the fixed income space, in which we take all the ratings on our fixed income instruments around the world and put them on that. So we have a whole broad ecosystem that fits on one another, from structured products to futures and options to indices, and any single security information about ratings and all of that to factor models in equity and fixed income. And on the other side, on the client side, we are compared to some of our other competitors. Our client base is the investor, and therefore, where the highest demand for ESG tools is from investors, not from corporates at this point or issuers. The highest client advantage is investors, there are very few people in the world like us. We are well positioned on the investor side to capitalize on that, but having said that, we're expanding into the corporate sector to provide a lot of these ESG ratings on a sectorial basis to a lot of our corporate entities, so they can look at it and figure out how to provide disclosures and improve the information that they provide in order to get better ratings from people like us. So multiple is a quiver of arrows; that is going to be very hard for anybody to break in. That's a huge moat that we have in this business. And lastly, we have a first mover advantage in the whole world.

That's great. And Andy, next one for you, just congrats on your new role. I'm not expecting that there will be dramatic change in strategy, especially since you've been part of the leadership team for a while now. Just maybe you could talk about how you think about the potential for margin expansion from here over time? Just given operating leverage but also investment needs, should we be thinking about sort of a x basis points per year of expansion or EBITDA growth and low double digits or what kind of framework do you think of when you're thinking about margins and the potential for further business? Thanks.

Thanks, Toni. I appreciate the remarks. And as you said, no, real major change in strategy, particularly given my experience with the company and my role and strategy previously. If anything, I think the combination of strategy and finance creates opportunities for us to create even more value, where we are as a company right now is faced with enormous opportunities across all aspects of our company. And so, the next leg of value creation for the company is going to be really prioritizing where we are placing our incremental debt and where we're placing our incremental investments to chase those opportunities. As Henry just talked about with ESG, making sure we're being proactive in capturing these very attractive markets and really continuing to differentiate ourselves. The financial algorithm, I’d say, is not changing significantly at this point, other than to say we have an intense focus on investment here. Going back to Henry's comments on the first question, the margin in this current quarter was higher than what we would like. I think that's a reflection of some of the activities we took earlier in the year and reduced expenses in areas like travel and entertainment and professional fees and marketing. But those are masking some of the accelerations of investments we’re making. And so, as we continue to make those accelerations in these investments, we go to our upturn playbook, and we’re intensely focused on our Triple Crown framework, where we are investing and those opportunities that have the highest return, the shortest payback, and are most valuable to us and our shareholders. We are going to continue to invest in those attractive opportunities. So I think you'll see likely a pickup in expenses in the fourth quarter, and that will trickle through the next year, where you will continue to see I think, an acceleration in investment through next year and higher expense growth. And so, it's not a dramatic shift, other than to say the emphasis is really on driving investment here. And I think you'll probably talk more about this at Investor Day in February.

Our next question comes from Chris Shutler with William Blair. You may proceed with your question.

Question on ESG. So many large asset managers are using multiple providers of ESG data as kind of an initial screen, which then feeds into more proprietary ESG analyses that they put in place in-house. So the question is, do you think that the ESG business remains fairly fragmented with asset managers using several providers at the same time? Just given how subjective ESG is and how different some of the ratings can be among the providers, or do you see that changing over time? And do you think that the desire to work with multiple providers places any kind of cap on how much asset managers are willing to spend on ESG?

So definitely, it's a good question. Let me try to explain how we view it. In everything that we do at MSCI is we want to position ourselves as close to the investment decisions made by our clients as possible. And therefore, what we're trying to do is to give clients really made, already analyzed, already thought-through solutions to some of their problems and capitalize on their opportunities. So, we are uniquely positioned to do that in creating ESG equity indices, ESG fixed income indices, and ESG risk models in order to serve the equities and fixed income markets. We're starting to look into developing plans to do that in the private asset classes as well. And all of that requires the underlying data, the underlying ratings and all the research associated with those ratings, you need the screenings and the exclusion research that we do. All of that is not sufficient; it’s a necessary condition but it's not sufficient for success. So where you see competition, for us, it’s in the provision of the underlying data. And a lot of our clients are subscribing to various sources of data for sure. But ultimately, that data needs to be translated into a tool for an investment decision. Therefore, we’ll see some competition in providing underlying data, and that's perfectly fine with us. But we are—where our position is very leading and very prominent is in providing the tools that are derived from that data in order to help people make better investment decisions in that space. There are not going to be too many people like us.

Henry, just a quick follow-up on that, would you be, I mean as you think longer term around the ESG franchise? Do you see yourselves developing some kind of a tool that integrates other third-party ESG data with yours and combines it all as a solution?

Definitely, that could definitely happen. We're not working on that at this very moment, but that could definitely happen. This is in the spirit of the strategic partnerships that are at the core of our MSCI strategy. We want to partner with everyone in the world that wants to do that with us in order to serve our clients. And for everyone to win and to make money in all of this. That will definitely be the case in ESG data. We already are partnering with smaller institutions that provide data. An example of that is the Carbon Delta acquisition; it started as a partnership in which Carbon Delta was providing us with climate metrics and climate value-at-risk to create a joint product. As we developed that partnership, we became very close, and the Carbon Delta management team and the shareholders decided that it was better that they join forces with us. That didn't have to happen, but that was an example of a partnership. And we have a few more of those, and we would like to do those with the bigger providers of ESG information as well. But obviously, they may view us as competitors, and they may not want to do that. But our intent is to do that.

Our next question comes from Craig Huber with Huber Research. You may proceed with your question.

I have a couple of questions. One, can you talk a little bit about the price environment from your perspective? I mean revenue growth speaks for itself. Can you just talk about the pricing both within analytics that you're able to get in this environment and also within your index subscription area please—I have a follow-up?

Yes, hi, Craig. Yes, so look, my simple headline is great stability in pricing. We're not really seeing any, I would call it unusual pressure or any fundamental changes in the pricing environment at present. So, look, that could change in the future, but right now, nothing to suggest that our pricing power has been affected in any material way.

And then secondly, can you size for us your institutional passive products area? I guess including the direct-to-index scenario, whether it be AUM basis or as a percent of your revenues within indices for example?

Yes, Craig, it's Andy. So we haven't put out the institutional passive AUM levels in the past. I can say that it is larger than the ETF AUM given the nature of that market. These are big assets, and the fees tend to be lower generally than the pricing we get on ETFs. You've obviously seen the revenue that we put out, so you can mention how big the revenue is to us. But this is a significant opportunity, particularly on the institutional passive front that I alluded to earlier. We're increasingly seeing institutions investing directly into an index. And in many instances, those are kind of customized indexes to help them achieve their objectives. And so, many times those will involve ESG overlays, factor overlays, and increasingly things like thematic-type considerations. And so, we're very excited about that opportunity. You alluded to the direct indexing opportunity; I think it's very similar but for a different client base. So with the rise of direct indexing, particularly in channels like the wealth channel, we are in a very unique position to either provide the index that the client can invest directly in, or provide the ingredients that the wealth manager can use to create an index that's directly suited to that client. And so we think we're very well positioned to capitalize on both opportunities.

Our next question comes from Owen Lau with Oppenheimer. You may proceed with your question.

Yes, thank you for taking my question. Could you please give us an update on your partnership with Burgiss? So what are the new products in the pipeline and maybe which product you think can move the needle longer-term? Thank you.

Yes, so at the beginning of this year, as you know, we announced the equity investment in Burgiss. We had spent a meaningful amount of time in the prior years working with the Burgiss databases to create risk models in private equity. For example, for our multi-asset class, enterprise risk, and performance product line. So, on the heels of that equity investment, we have now launched into a wide range of discussions about many other areas where we can partner in the use of that data. And that got slowed down in the second quarter. We started in earnest in the first quarter, it slowed down in the second quarter and through the summer because of the disruptions on the pandemic. But it's now back on track, and examples of that in the last say month and a half, we have held very significant, very senior-level discussions with the biggest alternative investment managers in ways in which we can partner up with them strategically and help them with a lot of their needs on data and analytics to capture a bigger pie of investment opportunities from the institutional investors or the LP clients. So that has not yet monetized. But for sure, the dialogue that we have is at the most senior level, with extreme high levels of interest to do this. The other thing that happened is, as you saw, Jay McNamara, was a longtime executive at MSCI, who was named President of Burgiss, and his mandate is to build a state-of-the-art client coverage organization for Burgiss in terms of sales and relationship managers and consultants and marketing people and commercial product management people and all of that. So, Jay is very busy at work in building that. And with that front office organization in a much higher state is going to coordinate very closely with the MSCI client coverage organization in order to expand significantly the sales and the penetration that Burgiss and MSCI have in clients around the world. So they're kind of two areas of collaboration: there is the sales and penetration with clients and the second one on the product side trying to do joint products in either evaluated pricing or expansion of the data sets or risk models and the like.

And then for the demand from a broker dealer for OTC derivatives and structured products linked to MSCI indexes. Could you please help us understand the growth a little bit more here? And I think you mentioned one example for that, which is a new product. But was the growth mainly driven by volatility with the same client base or you can actually increase the penetration here? Thank you.

Yes, sure. So, I think it's really a strategic shift. Clearly, market volatility doesn't hurt. But I would say that if we look back on this segment historically, our approach was much more to just take our existing indexes and license them. Today, it's more like a product sale type of relationship. Today, we're in a much more service mode with these clients. We're typically involved much more in customization. Some of that customization is also involving our analytics tools as well as our indexes and a variety of new methodologies. So, I think it's really a pretty significant shift in focus and a step-up in servicing, and we hope to continue to be able to see pretty attractive growth from the segment based on that.

Our next question comes from Keith Housum with Northcoast Research. You may proceed with your question.

I was hoping you might be able to give - provide some color on the sales environment in terms of how it compares now versus I say a normalized environment? I mean it certainly looks like your sales are doing fine. But would you start to say you're able to sell without any issue even with the work-from-home constraints of all your geographies are still the same?

The short answer is yes. I must say it's been both, I would say, a large effort and a pleasant surprise. So, we've put enormous focus on ensuring that we have all the right focus, first of all, just keeping the teams together, keeping the teams motivated from a managerial point of view. We've enabled them with technology so that pretty much everything that we can do in terms of demos of our products, etc., can be done online. In many instances, we found that, for example, for client events, we actually have more attendance than we did in the sort of physical attendance days. So, I think, in terms of the sales process, where things are going really well, I would say the mechanics of it. And I think that that's reflected in pretty decent sales that we've been having in view of the circumstances.

And then Andy, just a little more geography here; you talk about the investments that you guys have made? If we look at the income statement, is most of that investment going in R&D or the cost of goods sold line? But where can we kind of see that investment as it flexes?

Yes, it's kind of spread across the board. So clearly, there is an element that shows up in R&D, and you've seen some modest growth there. But there is also an element that goes into cost of selling and sales and marketing as well. So when you think about the nature of these investments, it's mainly headcount, and the bulk of our costs are compensation-related. And that's the case for investments as well. So it's hiring technologists, hiring researchers, and hiring sales people to go after these new opportunities. And so, depending on the exact roles, you'll see those spread across mainly those three buckets in the income statement.

Yes, thanks. Appreciate it.

What I would also add is that over the next two, three years, you're also going to see a geography change in terms of a move from our own data centers and our own production environment, in which a lot of the investment is CapEx to the Microsoft Azure Cloud, which we mentioned during the summer on our announcement. Therefore, we see a significant amount of savings and a significant amount of scalability of our production environment. In terms of the expenses associated with that, they will go from CapEx and therefore depreciation more into EBITDA expenses as time goes by, and we'll keep you apprised of those changes so that there is no confusion in terms of what's happening to the EBITDA expenses.

Our next question comes from Henry Chien with BMO. You may proceed with your question.

Good morning, Henry, and congratulations Andy on the new role. I wanted to ask a little bit about the strategy. It sounds like especially with the partnerships and it seems like there are a lot of new solutions being developed with each call; is this a significant change in strategy in terms of how we should think about it, in terms of going through more partnerships? I guess it seems like it's more of a license model or is it more of a service model? Yes, if you could just explain that a little bit, and how should we think about that, and I guess with some of these new products, where do we see that in terms of the metric? I'm assuming most of it's in index, but just trying to understand how to track that as well? Thanks.

It is definitely a—I will not think of it as a quantum jump in strategy, but it's definitely a change in the evolution of the strategy. You could think of it in the concepts that I mentioned in the prepared remarks, which is how do we capitalize on these two big areas that we are operating on? First, provide indices as underlying for portfolios. The opportunities there are immense, because pretty much every portfolio in the world can have an index to serve as a guide, a benchmark, could be passive replication, or could be for the creation of baskets for structured products or for OTC derivatives. That's a big area. What are the ingredients? Some of them are off the shelf, some of them are customized, some of them are market-cap, some of them are factors, and ESG, some of them are climate, some of them are thematic in terms of the big mega trends in the world. They could be equities or fixed income, and eventually there will be product asset classes that can be used in a variety of ways. That's a big focus area. And then on the client side, we are compared to some of our other competitors. Our client base is the investor, and therefore we have the highest demand for ESG tools. We are well positioned to capitalize on that. But having said that, we're expanding into the corporate sector to provide a lot of these ESG ratings on a sectoral basis. So we have several arrows in our strategy, and it will be hard for anyone to break into that space.

Maybe just to add, Henry touched on M&A and the potential for tuck-in acquisitions or bolt-on acquisitions. As you know, we're extremely disciplined—financially disciplined, but also strategically disciplined to the points that Henry made. We are very protective of our capital and look at the returns across all uses. And I would highlight that discipline, as you can see, on the share repurchase front where we've repurchased year-to-date over $600 million of our shares, at prices, on average, less than $300 per share. It's always a trade-off in terms of the uses of our capital.

Yes, that makes sense. Just to clarify, when you talk about combining finance and strategy, what do you mean? Are you referring to partnerships or taking minority stakes, or how should we interpret that?

It's a fair question. Yes. Probably a novel concept. But it's mainly focused actually on the organic prospects. When we think about what is going to drive the most value for the company over the next several years, there are some important trade-offs we're going to have to make. As we've talked about here, we have a wealth of opportunities in front of us. Where we place every incremental dollar of capital is going to be extremely important. So we need to have a very robust framework that we use, like our triple crown framework, to think about what is going to be the best return on that incremental investment dollar. And what's going to be most strategic for us over the long term. There is also an element of an intense focus on efficiency. I'll call it strategic efficiencies. So thinking about how we can position the company from an infrastructure standpoint, from a process standpoint, from a technological standpoint to create scale and really turn what we do into a competitive advantage for the company going forward.

Our next question comes from Jake Williams with Wells Fargo. You may proceed with your question.

I appreciate the color on ESG provided. One follow-up question we had is within the ESG indexes revenue, can you break out what is asset-based and what is subscription-based, at least directionally?

So just to be clear, Jake, within the ESG research reporting segment, which shows up in all others, that is purely just our ESG research and rating. That's things like our screening tool or ratings. There is no asset-based fee that is running through that segment. All the asset-based fee revenue is coming from ESG indexes, which is reported within our index segment. Now when we show the integrated ESG run rate, which you've seen, the portion coming from index—so the ESG index run rate does contain an asset-based fee component, but we have not broken out that detail at this stage.

Is it fair to assume that, within that ESG index run rate section, that it's half and half? Is it more heavily weighted towards subscription or asset-based?

Hopefully, we can give more detail in the future. I don't want to dimension it right now, other than to say they're both meaningful, they are both growing. Just looking at the growth in the assets under management in ETFs linked to our ESG indexes, which have grown 100% year-on-year; you can imagine the asset-based fee component is growing at a very robust growth rate within there. The other point of reference I would highlight is you can see on our slides, we do highlight the index subscription run rate growth within ESG and factor modules. You can see that that is growing at 21%. Now, there are competing dynamics there between factors and ESG, but you can tell the subscription component's growing at a very healthy growth rate as well.

Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Henry Fernandez for any further remarks.

Thank you very much everyone for attending. In the run-up to Investor Day in February of next year, as we said earlier in the call, we will be reaching out to many of you either directly ourselves in listening tours, or some of our people that we work with will be reaching out to you for surveys and opinions on how best to optimize our franchise. We encourage you to take full advantage of that to provide us with feedback, ideas, and the like. Even if you don't get reached, please do not hesitate to reach us directly as well. If you have ideas and thoughts, we welcome them to put them all into our thinking as to the best way that we can describe our company, what we're doing, our opportunities, our investments during that virtual Investor Day. Thank you very much, and stay well and safe.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.