Good morning, and welcome to Newmont's Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, this event is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Tom Palmer, President and Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining Newmont’s third quarter 2022 earnings call. Today, I'm joined by Rob Atkinson and Nancy Buese, along with other members of our executive team. And we will be available to answer questions at the end of the call. Before I begin, please note our cautionary statement and refer to our SEC filings, which can be found on our website. Newmont delivered a solid third quarter, and we remain well-positioned to respond to the challenging market environment that our industry faces today. As we have done for more than 100 years, Newmont continues to leverage our leadership, collective experience and the strength of our global portfolio with the size and scale to build a resilient and sustainable future. Supported by our clear long-term strategy, we continue to focus on doing what we do best, delivering stable production from our responsibly managed portfolio of world-class assets, while investing in our future and creating value for all of our stakeholders. During the third quarter, Newmont produced 1.5 million ounces of gold and nearly 300,000 gold equivalent ounces from copper, silver, lead and zinc, as improved productivity and higher grades helped to offset the typical wet season impacts we experience every third quarter at our operations in the Southern Hemisphere. We remain on track to achieve our full year guidance ranges as we build momentum for strong production in the fourth quarter. We continue to reinvest into our business, advancing our near-term projects, including the construction of the production shaft at Tanami and the development of our new mine, Ahafo North, along with the layback of the Porcupine and the first wave of district expansions at Cerro Negro. With $6.7 billion in total liquidity, we have maintained an investment-grade balance sheet with the financial flexibility to balance steady investment into our most profitable growth projects with strong shareholder returns. Last week, we declared a third quarter dividend of $0.55, set within our established dividend framework, which is calibrated at a $1,800 gold price. This dividend demonstrates our confidence in our diverse global portfolio and our commitment to providing leading returns to shareholders. During the third quarter, we published our inaugural Tax and Royalty Contribution report, providing an overview of our tax strategy and economic contributions. As the world's leading gold company, we have a responsibility to generate shared value through our contributions in taxes and royalties, as well as job creation and economic development in the host communities and countries where we operate. And we believe that transparency is a prerequisite for building and maintaining trust with all of our stakeholders. You can find this report on our website along with several others that provide details around our non-financial reporting and leading approach to environmental, social, and governance matters. In early 2020, Newmont made a symbolic change around how we manage our safety performance. Stepping away from the mining industry's traditional use of a lagging personal injury rate in our bonus programs to measures that are focused on managing the critical controls that must be in place at all times to prevent fatalities. During the third quarter, we completed more than 160,000 interactions by our leaders in the field that were focused on these controls. This is a process we call critical control verifications. Since we made this change more than two years ago, our leaders have now completed over 1 million critical control verifications, proactively identifying and managing the risks that could lead to a fatality, and helping to ensure that our workforce returns home safely to their families and friends after each and every shift. At Newmont, we have a diverse global portfolio of operations that we are managing to safely and responsibly deliver steady production over the long-term. This year, we again expect to produce 6 million ounces of gold and 1.3 million gold equivalent ounces from copper, silver, lead, and zinc. Consistent with our full year outlook, and the most of any company in our industry. This year is very similar to last year with higher production expected in the fourth quarter to bring home a strong finish to the year. This production will be driven by higher grades at both Boddington and Merian, in addition to improved mining rates and mill performance, increased production from Subika Underground at Ahafo as mining rates improve with access to additional drill points, which, in turn, would deliver higher grade ore to the mill, improved productivity at our Canadian operations, where each site is positioned to deliver higher grade during the fourth quarter, and higher production expected from Nevada Gold Mines, driven by both higher grade and higher tons mined from open pits at Carlin and Cortez, along with improved autonomous haul truck performance at Turquoise Ridge. In addition to higher production volumes, we also expect to have lower unit costs in the fourth quarter, as we continue to take action to reduce or offset our exposure to elevated input prices and labor costs. We are working on improving productivity through increasing and optimizing truck payloads in both our open pit and underground haul truck fleets, improving underground development rates through increased equipment effectiveness, and the implementation of jumbo bolting in operations where this machine has not been used before. And leveraging our asset management operation support network, which is now remotely monitoring 3,500 fixed and mobile assets on a continuous basis. Through this work, we have seen full truck life increase by 85% and truck engine life increase by 40%. We're also working to reduce our consumption of high-cost input materials through the use of new technology and alternatives. For example, we are on track to achieve a 25% reduction in grinding media consumption through the use of high chrome specialty forged balls which have a much lower wear rate than the traditional steel balls. We are also reducing our consumption of cyanide through the use of best practice process control logic across our 12 operations. Importantly, we are continuing to drive to lock in best-in-class prices, reduce volatility in our long-term contracts, and manage our supply chains to ensure that we have key materials and consumables in sufficient quantities, across all of our operations. The impact from these cost and productivity measures, coupled with higher production volumes, have us on track to deliver lower unit costs in the fourth quarter, giving us the confidence in our ability to achieve our full year guidance for 2022. I'll now turn it over to Rob for a more detailed look at our performance during the third quarter, and what we can expect this quarter from our 12 managed operations and near-term projects. Over to you, Rob.

Thanks, Tom, and good morning, everyone. During the third quarter, between Tom and I, we had the opportunity to visit six of our 12 managed operations, including Peñasquito, Tanami, Merian, Porcupine, Cerro Negro and Cripple Creek & Victor. It's been very impressive to see firsthand the resilience and the dedication that our people continue to demonstrate each and every day. Last month, I was also able to spend some time in Nevada meeting with the new leader of NGM, Peter Richardson, and his extended team. It was a good opportunity to review the important work NGM is doing to further strengthen our culture and continue to improve operating performance. And as Tom just described, across our global business, we are putting a significant focus on and the effort into improving safety, cost and productivity. So turning to the next slide, let's get into my update, starting with our operations in Africa. Akyem remained a solid contributor in the third quarter, with higher tonnes mined, steady grade and sustained mill performance. In the fourth quarter, we expect to see an 8% increase in grade and a 30% increase in ore tonnes mined as we re-sequence our mining resources from the current layback due to being significantly ahead of our planned phase positions. As a result, Akyem is on track to deliver its strongest production performance of the year in the fourth quarter. Moving to Ahafo South. Grade and mining rates continued to improve through the third quarter, increasing gold production by 20,000 ounces compared to the second quarter. We expect production at Ahafo to increase yet again in the fourth quarter on the back of higher grades from the Subika pit and delivered improved mill performance versus Q3, as a result of improved availability from the maintenance work that was performed. We now have up to 20 draw points available in the Subika Underground and with similar numbers expected in Q4, we are in a strong position to deliver on the increase in ore tonnes. We also continue to ramp-up development work in Subika Underground, achieving record production drill meters, while continuing to advance the development of the third production level in the mine. An additional underground production drill arrives in November, further assisting the delivery of the planned development for the fourth quarter and the resulting ore tonnes in 2023. And finally, we continue to progress the development of our new greenfield mine Ahafo North. Engineering is more than 90% complete and procurement sits at 70%, with the first wave of heavy mining equipment having been delivered and assembled on site and is now ready to commence work. We are continuing to progress towards gaining full land access with approximately 75% of all the required activities now complete, including crop and land compensation and resettlement negotiations. Important stakeholder engagement work with local communities, traditional leaders and regulators continue, and we remain on track to gain full land access for this important project in early 2023. And now turning to our operations in South America. Cerro Negro delivered another solid performance in the third quarter, as lower ore grade was largely offset by strong mill performance compared to the second quarter. Productivity from this remote site continues to improve in particular, development meters, which have allowed us to access higher grades from the Amelia deposit. And I'm also pleased to announce that Cerro Negro is the first mine in Argentina to implement the automine technology, a tele-remote operating system for underground loading and hauling. The implementation of this technology has eliminated safety risks associated with operator exposure underground, has allowed for the recovery of more ore from each of the stopes, has reduced equipment damage, and really importantly in the Argentinian context, increased underground working time. We've had tremendous success with tele-remote operations at our Australian and Canadian underground mines, and this is yet another example of the value-added through the rapid replication of leading practices across our global operations. Turning to Merian. We delivered slightly lower production compared to the second quarter due to very heavy rain in the third quarter and a mill maintenance shutdown. Merian is well-positioned to deliver a strong finish to the year as we sequence into approximately 5% higher grades in the Maraba pit and deliver improved mill performance versus Q3, as a result of improved availability from the maintenance work that was performed. And finally, Yanacocha continued to deliver solid results. We saw improved recoveries from the use of a richer leaching solution helping to offset lower tons mined and placed on the leach pads. And now over to our operations in North America. Peñasquito delivered another very strong performance in the third quarter, increasing gold production by more than 50% due to higher grade from the Penasco pit, whilst maintaining steady levels of silver, lead and zinc production. It is important to note that 60,000 gold equivalent ounces and finished goods inventory at Peñasquito was built up at the end of the quarter, as a shipment of gold bearing lead concentrate that was produced at the end of September was not sold until the fourth quarter, partly due to impacts on shipping logistics from earthquakes and heavy rain in Western Mexico. Looking ahead, and it is important to note, gold production from Peñasquito is expected to decline in the fourth quarter as we mine around 35% lower gold grade ore from the Chile Colorado pit, which is part of our planned mine sequence in this large polymetallic mine. Moving to CC&V. We delivered steady production from higher tons mined in the third quarter. We expect production to remain consistent into the fourth quarter, as we continue to optimize ore placement and reduce unit costs at this leach-only operation. And turning to Canada. Éléonore, Musselwhite and Porcupine all delivered improved production in the third quarter, a combined increase of more than 20,000 ounces compared to Q2. At Éléonore, we continued to increase staffing levels, especially those associated with critical roles and improved productivity amid a very competitive labor market, delivering improved production from higher ore grade in the third quarter. In Q4, we will see an increase in the number of available stopes ready for ore extraction, improving our mining flexibility with four stopes available at all times. And we continue to increase our staffing levels. And importantly, we expect to be back to full complement by the end of this year. At Musselwhite, we delivered higher grade ore from the PQ Deeps area in Q3 and expect an improvement in grade in the fourth quarter as we mine our first double lift stope in PQ Deeps. And finally, at Porcupine, we mined higher grades from both the Hoyle Pond and Board and underground mines in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter, Hoyle Pond has a strong pipeline of stopes available, which will contribute towards a 10% higher grade compared to Q3. And in addition, as a result of the optimization of our maintenance plans, work on the primary crusher of Porcupine has been moved into 2023, allowing for higher mill availability during the fourth quarter. And we continue to progress work on the Pamour project, a layback with the ability to extend mine life at Porcupine through to 2035. The work to dewater Pamour has commenced, with the interim water pumping and treatment plant successfully starting up after receiving all of the necessary permits. And now turning to our two operations in Australia. Boddington delivered lower gold and copper production compared to the second quarter, as the site was impacted by very significant rainfall associated with some extreme winter weather in Southwest Australia, some network outages, which impacted the autonomous haul truck fleet, and lower mill throughput due to crusher and conveyor maintenance in August were also contributors to Boddington's third quarter performance. Boddington is well positioned to finish the year strongly, as we sequence into a section of the pit with higher gold grades, approximately 12% higher than those in Q3. We have also resolved the network issues and Southwest Australia is now moving into the typical hot, dry summer weather pattern. And turning to Tanami, we delivered solid production results compared to the second quarter due to sustained ore grades, tons mined and mill performance, and we expect production to remain relatively consistent in the fourth quarter. We continue to progress the second expansion project at Tanami, and we have now reached an important project milestone, completing the reaming of the 1.5 kilometer deep production shaft and the installation of the head frame and hoisting infrastructure. Lining of the shaft has commenced. And in the photo, you can see it being lowered into the shaft, what is called the stage or a Galloway. And that will be used to conduct this specialized work. Shaft lining will take around two years to complete and will be conducted in parallel with the installation of the major underground infrastructure such as crushers, conveyors, ore bins and pumping stations. The underground development work is largely completed, and we are now commencing the associated civil and structural works and we look forward to providing further details on this important project during our 2023 guidance webcast. And with that, I'll turn it over to Nancy on the next slide.

Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Let's start with a look at the financial highlights. In the third quarter, Newmont delivered $2.6 billion in revenue at a realized gold price of $1,691 per ounce, and adjusted EBITDA of $850 million, with our free cash flow being impacted by unfavorable working capital movements of more than $300 million in the third quarter. These items included a $95 million payment associated with the previously communicated Peñasquito profit-sharing agreement reached during the second quarter. An $83 million payment of accrued severance related to the planned Canadian employment model change, and $80 million of sales value from the buildup of inventory at Peñasquito, as Rob has mentioned. In the third quarter, we invested nearly $700 million through capital, exploration and advanced project spend as we continue to progress our near-term projects, make progress toward achieving our climate targets and orient the portfolio for the future of Newmont. Last week, we declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share for the eighth consecutive quarter, in alignment with our dividend framework and calibrated at a $1,800 gold price. Compared to the second quarter, adjusted net income declined $0.19 despite relatively consistent production and direct costs. This was due to lower metal prices for copper, gold, silver and zinc, as average realized gold prices decreased nearly $150 per ounce in the third quarter. In addition to lower metal prices, we also experienced lower sales volumes during the third quarter, driven by the timing of concentrate sales at Peñasquito. These impacts, along with other material items resulted in third quarter adjusted net income of $212 million or $0.27 per diluted share. Underpinned by the largest production base in the sector, Newmont has established a healthy liquidity position to allow for balance sheet strength and flexibility in light of the current global economic conditions. During my tenure at Newmont, we have intentionally worked to provide clarity around our discipline and capital allocation, and a set of principles for how we reinvest in our business and provide returns to shareholders, grew our cash balances of $3.7 billion with total liquidity of $6.7 billion, while returning more than $6 billion to shareholders in dividends and share buybacks since 2019, responsibly managed our long-term debt through refinancing at historically low coupon rates and in alignment with our ESG targets and achieve a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 0.5 times, below our target of 1.0 times. With an investment-grade balance sheet and no debt due until 2029, Newmont's financial position provides a platform on which to support the next decade of production performance and reinvestment into the business. As I reflect on the last six years I've spent at Newmont, I am so proud of the work that we have accomplished to build financial strength and flexibility as well as the framework for our capital priorities. And as I move to my next opportunity, I remain confident that Newmont will continue to prioritize long-term value to its shareholders. And with that, I'll turn it back to Tom.

Thank you, Nancy. And building on your comments, we have maintained a disciplined and balanced approach to capital allocation, a key component in sustainably managing and mining business through the commodity cycles. Our capital allocation priorities remain unchanged and follow a clear hierarchy. First and foremost, to maintain an investment-grade balance sheet with financial strength and flexibility. Second, to reinvest in our business through exploration and organic growth. And finally, to return excess cash to shareholders through dividends and opportunistic share buybacks. From the robust foundation of our balance sheet that Nancy just described, our next capital allocation priority is to sustainably reinvest in value-accretive projects from our industry-leading organic pipeline. Our long-term outlook assumes an annual investment of around $1 billion in sustaining capital, $800 million in development capital, and $400 million in exploration and studies. Combined, this is an average annual investment of more than $2 billion every year, a critical component in Newmont's strategy to sustain strong production levels and improved margins over the long-term. We have entered a period of meaningful reinvestment, as we continue to advance our near-term projects, including the expansion of Tanami in Australia, the Ahafo North in Ghana, and Yanacocha Sulfides in Peru. In September, we announced that we had made a disciplined decision to delay the full funds approval of our Yanacocha Sulfides project in order to manage project execution risk, move out of a period of significant inflation, and to balance our development capital cash flows. To support this decision, I've also taken one of our best leaders in Dean Gehring to rigorously review the scope and pace of this project. As part of this work, Dean is stepping back and reviewing the Sulfides project in total, which will include assessing a range of scope and schedule scenarios through to and including the impacts of not proceeding at all. And as Dean progresses his work over the coming months, we will continue to keep you updated. So, on the back of a strong balance sheet and reinvesting into our business, our final capital allocation priority is to return excess cash to our shareholders. Two years ago, Newmont was the first in the gold industry to announce a clear dividend framework, providing our shareholders with a base dividend calibrated at our reserve price assumption of $1,200 per ounce. In addition, our shareholders have the potential to receive between 40% to 60% of the incremental free cash flow we generate at gold prices above our base assumption. Now, as we do at this time every year, we are currently working through our annual business planning process. As part of this exercise, there are two key inputs to our dividend framework that we are critically reviewing. The first, as I've been discussing for some time now, is the long-term gold price and the assumption we use for both reserve pricing and project approvals. This assumption is a key input for determining the payout level of our base dividend. The second key input is the free cash flow we expect to generate above this base level, and this is impacted by the current global economic environment that we are all operating in. Over the next month, we will finalize and our Board will approve our business plan. We will then provide a comprehensive update on these inputs and associated outputs with our long-term outlook during our 2023 guidance webcast. However, I can assure you that we clearly understand the importance of returning cash to our shareholders, and we have a proven track record of doing so. With our third quarter dividend declared, we will return nearly $4 billion through dividends since we introduced our framework two years ago. We will continue to take a long-term view to determine the appropriate level of current dividend payouts, and we remain committed to a clear dividend framework. Before I wrap up, I'd like to take a moment to thank Nancy Buese for her exemplary leadership and sound guidance during this transformative period in Newmont's history. Nancy has built a very capable and dedicated team that will continue to strengthen our financial position and support our capital priorities for a long time to come. And we wish Nancy all the very best for her next opportunity with Baker Hughes. And with that, I'll turn it over to the operator, open the line for questions.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. The first question comes from Jackie Przybylowski of BMO Capital Markets.

Thanks very much and thanks for the update everyone. I guess, I wanted to dig in a little bit on the dividend framework. In the past, it's a percentage of free cash flows above that $1,200 gold price. And it's apparent in the last couple of quarters, I mean, you've kept the dividend stable, but that free cash flow number has maybe gone down, so the percent is outside of your stated range. When you finalize your new dividend framework, whatever that's going to look like, do you have any thoughts to maybe making that a little bit more flexible or calling it maybe a guideline instead of a hard rule to reflect the reality of how you're using the dividend framework anyway? So can you give a little bit of color into your thoughts around the structure or how structured it will be going forward? Thanks.

Thanks, Jackie. Good morning. What you can expect to see with our framework is something that's consistent with what is out there today. So we're committed to that framework, but we will update it in terms of an assumption that we will update our reserve pricing. So that inevitably will lead to a higher base dividend from the $1,200 and then everything will shift across. So for argument sake, if we went to a reserve price of $1,300, then we would continue to move in $300 increments to $1,600 and $1,900 and then determine our payout at those levels. So you're going to see a framework that looks very similar to the one that we're operating under today. We will continue to take a long-term view to determine the appropriate level of dividend payouts and we'll do so through that framework that's going to look very similar to what you see today. And that long-term view will take into account both the historical gold price and our forward-looking view on gold price over the long term, so over a year or longer. And we'll include in that our expected free cash generation that's going to come from the longer-term outlook that we'll update you with our 2023 guidance webcast. So we look at the long term, Jackie, both gold price backwards and forward and our assumptions for it going forward, our long-term view going forward, and then we'll make some judgments about the free cash flow we generate and the rate of dividend that we pay out. We'll do that rather than look at a stand-alone period, whether it’d be a quarter or a six-month period. So we're going to maintain a framework that's going to look very similar to what it is today, and we're going to maintain a long-term view, both backward looking on gold price and forward-looking on gold price and the free cash flow that we expect to generate from our long-term outlook.

Okay. Thank you. That's clear. I know this question was asked at Denver, but I thought it would be worth asking again in case there are any changes. You have a lot of moving parts in your framework, including how much material is classified as ore versus waste and everything. Given the potential change to the gold price that you might use, is it fair to say that if you raise the gold price in your framework, in your business plan and in your reserve and resource calculation, the dividend is most likely to go down? Have you done enough work on that yet to make that determination?

Jackie, we're still in the middle of our business planning process, so that's still in flight. In terms of the cash flow that would be generated at a new reserve price, and our leverage to higher gold prices under that plan, an important factor we still don't have, which arrives every November, is the updated plan details from our two non-managed joint ventures. Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo make up a significant part of our portfolio, so we need to include and understand those inputs before making a final determination. It's still premature to signal one way or the other; the process is ongoing.

Appreciate that. Thanks. Thanks very much, Tom. That’s it for me.

Thanks, Jackie.

Our next question is from the line of Lawson Winder of BofA. Lawson, your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, Tom, Nancy and Rob, thank you for the update today. I wanted to ask actually on that exact point you just brought up, which is, you are waiting on the sort of gold price assumption from PV and Nevada Gold Mines. And what I was wondering is, I mean, will that help you determine what gold price you use for the other assets, or could we have a situation where you use one for Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo, and another for the 100% owned Newmont assets? Thanks very much.

Yes. Thanks, Lawson and good morning. When we think about reserve pricing, we'll use the reserve price number that the manager of both those assets use for determining their reserves. So, again, theoretically, if we chose a $1,400 reserve price and Barrick chose a $1,300 reserve price, we would declare our reserves on those two different prices. So we wouldn't try and have everything consistent. We would use the operator's reserve pricing, and we would make that very clear in our reserve and resource declarations.

Okay, great. Thanks for pointing that.

It won't be material, given the margins you see on both those operations, it's that sort of movement between reserve pricing is unlikely to be material.

Okay. Thanks very much. I also wanted to ask about the Ahafo North land access. So I mean, obviously, there's been several delays. But I mean for good reason, I understand that you guys are making sure you negotiate a very fair and long-lasting agreement. I just wanted to kind of better understand what steps are left? And then what factors kind of give you confidence that you think early 2023 is the timeline for ultimately getting that access agreement?

Yes. Thanks, Lawson. I'll kick off and maybe get Rob to add a bit more color. But what's really important in this process is patience. There's an old African proverb, and we're right in the middle of Africa in Ghana, that if you want to go fast, you go alone. If you want to go far, we go together. And if ever that's playing out, it's playing out at the Ahafo North, where it is absolutely essential that we bring all of the stakeholders along in the journey, so that when we have full unfettered access to that land, we have the support of all of those stakeholders and then we can get after that project to deliver value for the next couple of decades out of that mine as opposed to going fast and alone. And I would predict a project that would be disrupted over the course of its life. And we have learned some hard lessons over 100 years in terms of the importance of bringing all your stakeholders along. So it's a very important principle that we apply. The gold isn't going anywhere. That project is going to be a terrific mine in the Newmont portfolio from about 2025, 2026 onwards and deliver great grade ounces at pretty good operating costs for a long time to come. But Rob, maybe if you talk to the sorts of things that we see that give us confidence that we're pretty much in the home straight as we move through November and December to early in the year getting full land access?

Okay. Thanks, Tom, and thanks for the question, Lawson. Just building on what Tom said that we are making very significant progress. As I mentioned, we're up to 75%, and that includes demolishing and removing structures, demolishing and removing fish ponds, etc. And that's certainly some of the most topical work that we've had to do. We continue to enjoy very, very strong support from the regional and also the national government. And we meet on a task force on a very, very regular basis, and that continues to progress well. So that gives us an enormous amount of confidence. We're not just talking about these things; you can see demonstrable progress on the ground itself. And I think the last part that I would just add is that Ghana is certainly in a challenging time financially. This project is very well supported by the government. It will bring significant employment, significant revenue, etc. So we're very confident that we are very much targeted for that land clearance being completed very early in the New Year.

Okay. Fantastic. And if I might, I'm not sure if Dean is on the line, but the language around the expected annual production at Yanacocha, I think before, it was like 500,000 to 525,000 GEO. That was removed. So would it be fair to interpret that, I mean, given the scope of this project is under review. So I mean it could be more or less sort of annual production if it does ultimately go ahead?

Thanks, Lawson. I might kick off and Dean is sitting alongside me and I'll get him to build on it as well. The flowsheet for Yanacocha Sulfides is largely set. You have a copper concentrator that provides a concentrate feed into the autoclave, and high-grade ore from the Chaquicocha underground also feeds the autoclave. The autoclave is sized and has been fabricated and is sitting in a factory in Turkey. That really determines your throughput and the gold-equivalent ounces you'll get from gold, copper and silver. The central case was to move through to a full funds approval in two years' time. Dean is testing a number of scenarios: is it a schedule-driven approach, is it a cost-driven project, are there other ways to build some of the infrastructure smarter, and are there lessons we can learn from other projects around the world. It's really about stepping back and having a critical review of the project to see where you can bring capital costs down within the constraints of a flowsheet that will give you similar gold-equivalent ounces. Dean, why don't you share your view on that?

Yeah, Tom. The one thing I would add to that is that as we continue to interrogate the scope of the project and the costs. We're also looking at the existing operations. And so as we continue to make improvements there, that provides a potential opportunity to extend oxide production, which is something we're also looking at.

So a key part of that, Lawson, is we're taking some technology that we developed at Cripple Creek and Victor, it's called injection leaching into the leach pads. And Yanacocha has got deep leach pads that we've been building and operating there for 30 years. And so there is an opportunity to take some of that technology and adapt it at Yanacocha and to extract more gold from the ore that we've already mined and placed on the heap leach pad. So how can we extend oxide production and also look at reducing costs at that on-site operation, which will then in turn support the economics of our sulfide project.

Thank you very, very much. And Nancy, best of luck in your next role.

Thank you.

Thanks Lawson.

Our next question is from the line of Fahad Tariq of Credit Suisse.

Hi. Thanks for taking my two questions. Maybe first on the shipping logistics issues in Mexico. Can you just provide some more detail on what exactly happened? I haven't heard of your peers having similar issues within the country. And then also, has it been resolved now?

Good morning Fahad, I'll kick off and then pass to Daniel, who — one of the hats Daniel wears, he is sales and marketing. So it's actually his area of accountability and he can give you some color in terms of what played out late in September. But as it turned out, we had a really nice shipment of good high-grade concentrate that we're looking to get off to market at the end of September. It was produced, in the trucks, heading down the port. Daniel, can you give some color to Fahad in terms of how that played out in terms of that shipment not being able to get to market before the end of September?

Yeah, definitely. Thanks, Fahad. Thanks for the question Fahad. Thanks Tom and thanks for the question Fahad. It's nothing unusual. I'd say it's really just a timing impact on the shipping logistics. There was a hurricane that came through the last week of the month. In September, there were a number of earthquakes that actually shut down for a couple of days. And just based on those impacts, it impacted our timing to be able to get the concentrate under the ships. Like Tom mentioned, there was some high gold grade that went into finished goods inventory at the end of the month that we hoped to get out and sold, but your second question has been resolved. There is no issues with customers or shipping at this point, and we're moving forward. So that will be recognized in the fourth quarter, we should see a nice sales pickup from that.

And just building on that, Daniel, it's sold. So we're able to sell it very early in the fourth quarter, and there's not any systemic issue there Fahad. There's not something that's going to play out every quarter. It was an unusual combination of natural events of a hurricane and a number of earthquakes in quick succession which was quite disruptive for that isolated part of Mexico, but very much a one-off.

Okay, that's clear. And then maybe just one more on Yanacocha and maybe Rob can weigh in on this. I noticed the cash cost came up quite substantially quarter-over-quarter, up about 34%. And then the presentation mentioned focusing on identifying opportunities to enhance performance. Maybe just touch a bit on the underlying kind of cost performance there, and if there's anything of note other than just lower production quarter-over-quarter that led to the higher cost? Thanks.

Thanks Fahad. I'll pick up the opportunity, it was a similar or linked to what we're just talking about with Lawson, is that an opportunity to look where we can extract more gold from the heap leach pads that we have sitting there at Yanacocha. It's really the opportunity to apply what's called injection leaching—really drilling holes, getting drill rigs on top of those high pads and pumping solution into those holes to be able to extract more gold and looking quite interesting in terms of where we might be able to extract some additional gold and be able to do so relatively low cost. Daniel, can you add anything in terms of Fahad's question around cash cost at Yanacocha?

Yes. No, looking at the numbers as well, nothing that I can notice either. So, let's maybe we take that offline and we'll follow-up.

Yes, no problem. Sounds good. Thank you.

Thanks Fahad.

Our next question is from the line of Tanya Jakusconek of Scotia Bank.

Great. Good morning everyone. Can you hear me?

Good morning Tanya. Yes, we can.

Okay, great. Thank you. Nancy, congrats on your new role and best of luck. I have a couple of questions. I wanted to start off just on inflationary pressures. I'm just trying to understand if, number one, you're seeing any relief in inflationary pressures in your cost structure. I know on the Q2 call, I asked the question how much inflation are you seeing? And I think Tom and Rob, you mentioned about 12%. Is that what you saw also in Q3? And then looking out, have you seen any relief in consumables, a bit in fuel for sure, that labor at all in your portfolio? So, that's my first question.

Thanks Tanya. What we saw through the third quarter was direct operating costs almost in line with the second quarter. And that similar percentage that we talked about. So, it's that inflation of around about that 12%. So, we didn't see it through the third quarter. But we are starting to see some relief across energy and consumable costs coming into the fourth quarter and then seeing that play out into 2023. I mean a couple of things I'd call out within that. One is that we'll have a bit of a lag in that fully starting to flow through, where we see some of that relief. We're building rise and fall adjustment mechanisms into a lot of our long-term contracts that protect against the volatility, but also mean that some of that relief takes a little longer to unwind. We're also running with greater inventory in some of those key consumables and so you've got that higher cost inventory, which is really about predicting production that has to flow through as well. So across diesel, steel, ammonia and cyanide, chemicals and reagents and grinding media. They make up about 45% of our cost base, and we are seeing some relief in those flowing into the fourth quarter, and we're anticipating that that will flow into 2023. However, the world is still very volatile. And as we think about doing our business plans and making judgments about 2023, we're keeping a wary eye in terms of the level of volatility in the world. On labor costs, they are proving to be a bit stickier. About 60% of our labor cost is employees, and that's pretty stable across the countries in which we operate in. We're seeing about a 4% increase on average across wages. So that's pretty robust. And as Rob was talking about, we're starting to build back up to full complement as we come out the other side of some of the COVID impacts in the second half of this year, starting to see some voluntary attrition numbers returned to more long-run levels. So seeing some stability starting to get back into our business and not seen tremendous escalation in our employee cost base. However, we're still seeing high levels of cost inflation on our contracted services. So the label we use, the shutdowns and out of jobs around the world. We’re still seeing in the order of 10% in our cost base over what we're seeing this time last year. We see that as sticky, and so we're starting to step back and say what do we need to do to think about doing our work differently in order to mitigate some of those cost impacts. There's a number of levers that we're looking to pull to manage our costs. We're not sitting idly accepting costs coming at us. We're pulling a number of levers to improve our cost and productivity. And on the contractor side, we are actively looking at where we can bring contractors into our businesses, namely employees rather than contracted services, very much looking at doing that across some of our Canadian operations and looking to do that in Ghana at both Ahafo and Akyem. So not accepting that we pay those higher costs and look at what actions we can take to reduce that cost base.

Thanks for that. That was another thing I just wanted to know, was the percentage of contractors you had and how can you kind of buffer that 10% cost. So that's good to hear. I appreciate the insights into that. My second question would be on Ahafo North, and I know we have done 75% of what you need to do. I think that's what Rob's number that he gave, yes, of all activities has been completed. Can I just understand from 75%, so we've got another 25% to do from now until early next year? Can I just try and understand what are the critical, like, examples of what needs to be done from now until early next year, that 25%?

Yes. Thanks, Tanya. I'll get Rob to provide a little bit of color on that. It's going to be more of the same. We're basically following a project plan that includes the work we have been doing to get to 75%. It's continuing on that pathway to complete the final 25%.

That's correct and good morning, Tanya. The two critical elements are to complete the demolition of all the structures and we're expecting that to be done in the next five, six weeks. And then it's finalizing the remainder of the payment, which is by the end of the year. And again, that's just working very, very closely with the impacted farmers and others. So it really boils down to those two key elements. And as Tom indicated, the first of the heavy mobile fleet is on the ground assembled. So as soon as we pass that milestone, we're able to mobilize equipment pretty readily to start clearing ground in the initial mining area, starting the civil works around the processing facility.

Okay. That's good. Thank you for that. And then my final question is just coming back to Yanacocha and this injection leaching that you are now doing in the old leach pads. A couple of questions on this. Number one, are you then expecting the oxide production from the existing operations to be longer i.e., you're expecting more years of this than you had originally anticipated in your previous life of mine plans, which means that you have a bit more of time to make a decision on Yanacocha sulfides. Is that how I should think about it?

Tanya, I'll kick off and get Dean to provide some more color. Well, certainly, when we provide our updated guidance, we'll incorporate the additional ounces that we expect to come from just the work we've done to date on this. The oxide mine at Yanacocha will move into closure. Sulfides is really just a small incremental mine, a small layback on the open pit and a processing facility on a relatively small footprint. So we will continue to extract as much oxide gold as we can from existing heap leach pads. And then that facility will move into closure as we exhaust the oxide ore that we're mining. But Dean, do you want to build on that at all?

Yes. The only thing I'd add to that is that we will be doing water treatment activities for a number of years there. So we'll continue to look for any opportunity we can to produce gold through injection leaching or other small heap leaches that we can put into operation. So it could potentially extend a couple of years, but that's work we can see in front of us. And as Tom said, that will be put forward in guidance to come.

Okay. And just as a bigger picture, maybe for you, Tom. As you look at the Yanacocha Sulfides and, I think in your comments, you said maybe this isn't built at all and that's a decision that could be made. How do we look at M&A now for you? Is M&A moved up higher in your profile in terms of you've got your Tanami Phase 2 coming on, you've got Ahafo North. This gets pushed out. Does M&A play a role now?

Thanks, Tanya. I would say a couple points. One is Dean's work is very important; that critical review can lead you to pathways that are more value-accretive. Bearing in mind that Yanacocha Sulfides includes significant copper, so there's a strategic element there. But we must step back and look at all options and go to the precipice because I think we'll learn a few things by doing that. If there was a scenario where we decided to pause Sulfides, then next step for us would be to go back into our organic project pipeline and see what else stacks up. We've got the Coffee project in the Yukon, further opportunities around Ahafo, and around Tanami. So we would examine other projects in our organic pipeline as alternatives. Inorganically, I see M&A as a separate exercise. We have a set of operations and an organic pipeline that can comfortably sustain 6 million ounces of gold for at least the next decade. For inorganic opportunities, we keep our radar on. If we see assets or companies out there that we believe under the Newmont operating model we could add value, and they meet our filters, we would have a hard look. But I see that as separate to the work we do with our current set of operations and our organic pipeline.

Okay. Thank you. But I noticed that you didn't mention Nueva Unión and Norte Abierto, would those be lower priority down versus what you mentioned coffee, Ahafo, Tanami, etc., would that be lower priority for you?

No, I wouldn't assume or infer that because I didn't mention them, they would be lower priority. You've got Galore Creek, Nueva Unión, Norte Abierto. They absolutely would be part of that assessment. They add complexity because they're joint ventures, but they are absolutely part of the equation, particularly given the copper content and future demand for copper.

Thank you so much. I'll leave it to someone else to ask questions. Appreciate the insights.

Thanks Tanya. And operator, we'll continue through the top of the hour and continue to take questions until we've exhausted the list.

Great. Our next question is from the line of Anita Soni of CIBC. Anita, please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, everyone and congratulations, Nancy, on your new role at Baker Hughes and best of luck. So firstly, I guess I wanted to dig a little bit more on the cost going into Q4 and then also into 2023. So we've seen like a $30 per ounce incremental quarter-over-quarter over the last three quarters. Could you give us an idea as we go into Q4, like you've given us on an asset level, but just an overall ballpark increase in production that you're seeing like in the order of 10%, 15%, 20%, just to get an idea of like what cost relief we could see going into Q4?

Good morning Anita. I'll kick off and I might get Rob and Daniel to chip in as well. When you look at our unit costs for the fourth quarter, we're certainly looking at our strongest production quarter. So we're going to get the benefit of the additional ounces sold, improving our unit costs. And we'll also have the benefit of those concentrates that didn't ship in the third quarter being recognized in the fourth quarter. So that will play on the denominator side of the unit cost for the direct costs. We're certainly starting to see some relief through the fourth quarter, but that's got to actually wash out in terms of some of the flow-through on rise and fall in our contracts and inventory that we're carrying. So, I would expect that the direct costs for the fourth quarter are going to be reasonably flat compared to the third quarter because of that flow through. And then if we continue to see that relief, it's more likely to be what we might see presenting into 2023. And as I said with an answer to the earlier question, with a caveat that we're still in a very volatile world and what may or may not play out around the world geopolitically and the impact that has on cost is something that we need to be very careful about. Rob or Daniel, anything you'd add in terms of additional color on that?

Not for me, Tom. The only thing I'd certainly say is there is an enormous amount of focus on cost. Whether it's the quotes that we're getting for sustaining capital, whether it's, as I mentioned, teams prioritizing what we're actually doing based on the mining phases, etc., to make sure that we're managing costs just as closely as we're managing production. But aside from what Tom added, I don't have much more to say.

Yes. Anita, I think the only thing to mention is, obviously, our royalties and taxes would come down in the fourth quarter with the lower gold, right? So, we have those sensitivities out there in those materials. But aside from that direct cost seems to be consistent with the third quarter.

Okay. And then I guess, moving into 2023, a couple of questions. You said on the last Q2 conference call that you were sort of looking at a $900 per ounce and 6 million-ounce outlook for the next couple of years in 2023-2024. Is there any change to that? And I guess what I'm trying to drive at is, it seems like the costs are a little bit higher even with this inventory release that you're talking about, a little bit higher than that number that you were previously talking about at $900. And the second part of that question is, is there anything we should be thinking about in terms of production versus when you're talking about labor. Like are there development issues? You mentioned at Éléonore, you're getting back to full staffing levels. But is that something we should be thinking about in terms of when we look at the production gearing towards 6 million ounces? Big question. I know, sorry.

Thanks Anita. So, still very much seeing 2023 playing out, as I indicated on the last call, in round numbers, it's looking like around the 6 million ounces again and around about that $900 per ounce cost. We will see some relief on costs into 2024, and we're not sitting idly; we're actively working on improving productivity and managing our cost base. Some of the relief in input costs will flow through into 2023, but there is a lag because of contract mechanisms and inventory. The other caveat is that a significant percentage of our base is our non-managed joint ventures, and so we're still to see Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo's inputs. Everything I've seen today would point to 6 million ounces for 2023 and around about that $900 number. 2024 is where we are starting to see some relief come through, both in terms of input costs and from our ongoing productivity initiatives. So there's work for 2023 and more expected improvement into 2024. We also expect to get benefit from lower cost ounces from Tanami Phase 2 and Ahafo North from around 2025 onwards.

Okay. And then just one last question, if I may. You mentioned that on Yanacocha Sulfides that you were also assessing the impact of not moving forward at all with that. Could you just remind us what your current assessment of the closure liability would be on Yanacocha Sulfides?

The couple of important things to note there: the closure liability sits at just over $3 billion. But it's important that the Yanacocha oxide operation moves into closure, regardless of Sulfides. Sulfides is an underground mine, a small layback at one of the open pits and the construction of the processing facility for that ore. The rest of that operation—all of the waste dumps, all of the old open pits, all the heap leach dumps—move into closure, irrespective of any decisions we make or their timing around Yanacocha Sulfides.

Okay. So how would we think about the spend on that $3 billion over the course of, I guess, the next five to 10 years?

If you think about the money we'll spend at Yanacocha, the big-ticket items are the water treatment plants. There are two large water treatment plants that we are constructing. We're doing the study work to gear up to build and then will build through 2023, 2024 and 2025 and will commission around 2026. That's to take all the mine-impacted water, treat that water so we can discharge it to the environment. These are very large water treatment plants. So there's an expenditure on those plants. I think we've indicated to the market that we'll spend $350 million through 2023 and 2024 on those water treatment plants. That's the big closure spend. Then there's the work you do on rehabilitation and moving some old infrastructure. And then you've got the ongoing cost of processing water in perpetuity at Yanacocha, which is what closure is. It's collecting that water, processing and discharging it. So once you get through the other side of that investment in water treatment plants over the next four or five years, then you've got a long-run spend on running water treatment plants in perpetuity, and that closure liability assumes that cost for the next 50 years. About 75% of that cost is the cost of water treatment over the next 50 years.

Got it. Okay. All right. And then last one, sorry, if I may, because it reminded me that you were doing some work on tailings rehabilitation in terms of — I guess, trying to get an assessment on costs, I guess, the Denver Gold Forum. On the tailings dams that you had highlighted that didn't meet the international standards. Have you — could you provide a little bit more color on what we should expect there in terms of the cost to remediate Boddington and Tanami and — I think it's Porcupine and Musselwhite as well?

Yes. Thanks, Anita. It's an important one to clarify that every mining company that is a member of the International Council on Mining and Metals, ICMM, has committed to implementing the global industry standard on tailings management. That's the standard that we developed in conjunction with other stakeholders post the tragedy of Brumadinho. That standard requires each company to assess their tailings facilities and address extreme or very high consequence tailings facilities by August 2023 and then all others by August 2025. So there's clear commitments. We are assessing the work we need to do around our facilities. As you pointed out, there are facilities at Porcupine, Peñasquito, Ahafo, Yanacocha and Akyem. The work involves additional buttressing at different locations, as you assess those current constructions against that global standard. In some instances, the next lift may need to be to a different design standard. Rather than an upstream lift, it may need to be a full downstream lift. As Tom said, every mining company will be assessing their tailings facilities. My expectation is that every mining company will identify additional costs to comply with this standard and improve tailings management. We're not unique in this. For Newmont, about 25% of our sustaining capital is related to tailings and water. When we look at our sustaining capital budgets, for a business of our size that typically spends about $1 billion, I would anticipate that's probably going to be more like $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion going forward, and a good proportion of that will be associated with additional tailings work and some linked to energy and decarbonization projects as well.

Just a couple of other things, Anita. About the upstream method, if companies choose upstream methods, the level of scrutiny will be very significant. At Nevada, the NGM team are planning and putting buttressing in at the tailings dam there, and that will flow through in their budgets. And a very significant consideration at Pueblo Viejo is how that new tailings dam will meet the requirements of this standard. As Tom said, we're not Robinson Crusoe and the comments at Denver Gold were encouraging the investment community to ask questions of the mining companies about how they comply. We should be more transparent and held to account as an industry.

I'll leave it at that. Thanks. That’s helpful.

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Mike Parkin of National Bank.

Hi, guys thanks for taking my question. Just really one left. Can you comment in terms of your new neighbors in San Nicolás partnering on San Nicolás. Was that something that interested you or the fact that it's primarily a base metal project, it was not of interest to you?

It was something that we were aware of, Mike, but it probably didn't hit our radar in terms of what we already had in our organic pipeline. It was probably a little bit on the small side for us as we thought about further diversification, but we've got a polymetallic mine at Peñasquito. For us, if we're going to put management bandwidth into Mexico, I'd prefer our team to be laser focused on our exploration program to find the larger opportunities we believe sit under cover in and around Peñasquito. There's no doubt there are additional deposits in that district. I'd rather have our team focused on the exploration program on our existing leases rather than be distracted by something smaller next door. I think it's a great combination for those partners involved though.

And just on that regional exploration at Peñasquito, it was a while ago that we were down at Peñasquito, just pretty much on the onset of COVID. And you were talking about implementation of your proprietary technology for deep cover discovery. Can you just give us a bit of an update in terms of where things are, where we could expect an update on that?

Thanks for the question, Mike. Certainly, we are applying significant effort and significant resources at Peñasquito to not only do that type of sampling work, but also in terms of really chasing down our target areas. We've done substantial drilling in and around Cedros. When we visited, we had just struck an agreement with the local community to allow us access. So that drilling is proceeding well. We've also been doing some diamond drilling further afield. In terms of the deep sensing geochemistry, on those wide open plains there's a lot of contamination as material has been washed down from the ridges. So we're having to punch in fairly short holes—about 30 meters down to the rock—so that we can do the sampling there that we typically do on the surface. So it is proceeding well. We've got access in a number of the areas that we need to be in. And in terms of our budget next year, we're going to have six, seven rigs working at any point in time. We're using every possible source of information—DGS techniques, drilling, radiometric surveying, prior knowledge. There's a huge amount of effort going on down there and we will provide updates as we pull that information together.

Look forward to further updates. Thanks very much guys. That’s it for me.

Thanks Michael.

And our last question for today comes from John Tumazos of Very Independent Research.

Thank you for your patience. With cost of sales up about $229 from the fourth quarter 2020, should we assume other things held constant, like exploration results that you need to raise your gold price from $1,200 to $1,400 to stay even? First question. And second, with the current gold prices in the mid-$1,600s, does that undermine the basis for raising the gold price from $1,200 for reserves in which case you raise your cutoff grades or take a few reserves out?

Thanks John, and good morning. We're certainly seeing costs increase as we look into next year up to the $1,200 mark. I don't accept that all of these cost increases are structural—some will be, and some will be transient. We're working hard on cost and productivity improvements to get on top of them and to reduce volatility. When we debate and look at reserve pricing, it's less around the current cost base and more about looking at the macroeconomics of gold and where we see a floor in the gold price over the long run. As we've triangulated different analyses, $1,300 to $1,400 is where that discussion is falling out. We find it difficult to see a world where the gold price would go much below that long-term level. That said, the higher costs we're seeing may wash through, and our reserves and resources may be a wash as we come out the other side. So it's more driven by the long-run gold price view rather than short-term cost changes. And we will continue to work hard on managing our costs and controlling what we can control to maintain a base business with solid margins.

Thank you.

Thanks, John. I think, operator, that might be the last of the questions.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Tom Palmer for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for your time. Please enjoy the rest of your day and week. Thanks, everyone.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.