Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. And welcome to the Second Quarter 2020 Quanex Building Products Corporation earnings conference call. At this time, all participants' lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session (Operator Instructions). Please be advised that today’s conference may be recorded (Operator Instructions). I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Scott Zuehlke, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thanks for joining the call this morning. On the call with me today is George Wilson, our President and CEO. This conference call will contain forward-looking statements and some discussion of non-GAAP measures. Forward-looking statements and guidance discussed on this call and in our earnings release are based on current expectations. Actual results or events may differ materially from such statements and guidance, and Quanex undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information or events. For a more detailed description of our forward-looking statement disclaimer and a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, please see our earnings release issued yesterday and posted to our website. I'll now discuss the financial results. We generated revenue of $187.5 million during the second quarter of 2020 compared to $218.2 million during the second quarter of 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to softer demand in April related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Volume began to decline in late March, which is also when our two manufacturing facilities in the UK were shut down completely to comply with government orders. We've reported net income of $5.5 million or $0.17 per diluted share for the three months ended April 30, 2020 compared to a net loss of $24 million or $0.73 per diluted share during the three months ended April 30, 2019. The net loss in the second quarter of 2019 was mainly due to a non-cash goodwill impairment in our North American cabinet component segment. On an adjusted basis, net income was $6.4 million or $0.19 per diluted share during the second quarter of 2020 compared to $6.3 million or $0.19 per share during the second quarter of 2019. The adjustments made to EPS are for restructuring charges, impairment charges, certain executive severance charges, accelerated depreciation and amortization, foreign currency transaction impact and transaction and advisory fees. Adjusted earnings were essentially flat with lower SG&A offsetting volume declines related to the pandemic. On an adjusted basis, EBITDA for the quarter was $21.8 million compared to $23.4 million during the same period of last year. Moving on to cash flow and the balance sheet. Cash provided by operating activities was $2.5 million for the six months ended April 30, 2020 compared to $143,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2019. Year-to-date as of April 30, free cash flow was slightly lower than last year mainly due to the negative impact the pandemic had on working capital during the second quarter, as it was hard to adjust inventories quickly due to the speed at which it hit. However, we expect an improvement in working capital in the second half of the year, and we have reduced our capital expenditure program. We now plan to spend between $20 million and $25 million this year and currently expect to generate $30 million to $35 million in free cash flow in the second half of the year. As previously disclosed, we drew down our revolver by $50 million during the second quarter as a precautionary measure. We've subsequently repaid the $50 million and do not expect to have to draw on our revolver again for the rest of the year. However, we may use our Swingline as necessary in the normal course of business. Our balance sheet is strong. We have ample liquidity and our leverage ratio of net debt to last 12 months adjusted EBITDA remained unchanged at 1.4 times as of April 30, 2020. We will continue to focus on generating cash and paying down debt in the second half of the year, which should offset the decrease in forecasted EBITDA enough to keep our leverage ratio around 1.4 times for the remainder of the year. Because of our strong liquidity position and confidence in the second half, we do not foresee a change to our current dividend policy. I'll now turn the call over to George for his prepared remarks.

Thanks, Scott. Prior to giving my commentary on the quarter, I would like to take a moment to thank all of my Quanex teammates for their dedication and efforts during this global pandemic. As a group, they accepted the challenge of being an essential business and maintaining production so that we could provide uninterrupted service and products to our customers. They did this in an environment where the rules and regulations seemed to change daily. In addition, we witnessed countless examples of our employees giving their time, talents, and resources to help others in their communities. I am humbled and thankful to be on the team with so many amazing people. Thank you. Similar to our first quarter, the second quarter started strong and our results were trending better than projections. However, the COVID-19 pandemic and related regulations began to impact our business toward the end of March. As such, our focus shifted to the following priorities: first, the health, safety and welfare of our employees; second, supporting our customers; and third, liquidity and cash flow management. Company-wide, we have a very robust enterprise risk management process that evaluates various risk scenarios and prepares action plans to mitigate those risks. One such risk was a global pandemic and when COVID-19 hit, we were able to react quickly as we already had a plan in place. I will now discuss results from each of our operating segments. I'll start with the North American Fenestration segment. Each of our plants in this segment was deemed an essential business and operated throughout the entire quarter. Revenue declined 5.9% from prior year Q2. But we were seeing revenue growth prior to the impact from the pandemic. In fact, revenue was trending 3.1% above prior year levels for the first five months of our fiscal year. However, revenue in April declined by approximately 25% year-over-year due to the impact from COVID-19. As we have stated in the past, our cost structure is highly variable in nature and as such when our volumes drop, we acted quickly with furloughs, reduced work hours and reductions in discretionary spending, which enabled us to protect our margins. In addition, SG&A reductions, lower medical expenses, and lower incentive accruals all favorably impacted results. And we were able to realize a margin expansion of approximately 100 basis points in this segment during the quarter. Revenue in our European Fenestration segment decreased by 27.2% from prior year to $29.2 million, excluding foreign exchange impact. Similar to our North American Fenestration segment, revenue was trending 2.4% above prior year levels for the first five months of our fiscal year. However, largely due to the fact that the UK was shut down completely. Revenue in April was down approximately 85% year-over-year. As Scott mentioned in his comments, our UK manufacturing facilities were mandated to close on March 25th, and just recently restarted operations. Our German manufacturing facility remained operational, but on reduced shifts and work hours. Our North American Cabinet Components segment generated revenue of $50.7 million during the quarter, which was 19.4% less than prior year. This volume drop was driven by COVID-19-related impacts and the previously announced loss of one customer, who exited cabinet manufacturing in late 2019. Revenue in April decreased by approximately 37% year-over-year. After adjusting for the lost customer, revenue was down 14.6% for the quarter and 34% in April. The decrease in revenue in this segment was intensified due to the fact that some of our customers are located in states where cabinet manufacturing was not deemed essential. As a result, they were forced to close for some period. While each of our cabinet component plants was deemed essential and continued to operate throughout the quarter, the rapid pace of the customer closures in other states made it challenging to manage our fixed costs while balancing the needs and delivery requirements of our operating customers. We aggressively managed our variable cost structure by quickly implementing temporary furloughs and shortened work weeks. But the closure of some customers nevertheless had a negative impact on the segment’s EBITDA and margins. EBITDA was also impacted by an accrual for writing off a portion of the inventory associated with Chinese-sourced products for the customer that exited the cabinet business. Absent this write-off, we would have realized margin expansion in this segment as well. As I mentioned earlier, managing liquidity and focusing on cash flow has been a top priority. As such, we are actively managing the line items that we can control. We are proactively working with our suppliers on extended terms and payments. We are also making progress in adjusting our inventory levels to match volumes. Though this process does take some time given the rapid drop in shipments. CapEx has been reduced in an effort to optimize cash flow. However, because of our strong liquidity position, we will continue to spend capital on safety-related projects and growth-related strategic projects, such as the vinyl extrusion technology upgrade project that we have in Kent, Washington. We continue to be confident in our ability to generate cash and manage working capital during the second half of this year. These moves, combined with the normal seasonality of our business, should allow us to generate $30 million to $35 million of free cash flow for the full year, essentially all of which will be generated in the second half. Like most other companies, we withdrew our guidance for 2020 as soon as the negative impacts from the pandemic started to become apparent. As mentioned, results for the first five months of our fiscal year through March were solid. Revenue fell quickly in April. But we were prepared and we took the appropriate actions to minimize the impact on our business and margins. We are beginning to see signs of recovery and optimism across the building products industry. We currently anticipate Q3 revenue will be down by 20% to 25% year-over-year in North America and adjusted EBITDA margin will be down 350 basis points to 400 basis points. For the third quarter in Europe, we currently expect revenue to decrease by 40% to 45% year-over-year with adjusted EBITDA margin contracting by 550 basis points to 600 basis points. This forecast assumes a slow recovery in Europe, no second wave of COVID-19, and no further shutdowns or restrictions on our facilities. While we have very little visibility into our fourth quarter, we anticipate volumes will improve over Q3, but will not recover to prior year levels. We will provide an updated view on the full year when we report third-quarter earnings in early September. But we are very encouraged by what we are seeing and hearing from our customers. In summary, although we expect negative impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic to continue throughout this year, we are optimistic that we are seeing signs of recovery. We will stay focused on managing all items under our control with a continued emphasis on generating cash and maintaining a strong balance sheet. With that being said, operator, we are now ready to take questions.

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Daniel Moore with CJS Securities.

George, Scott, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. And I will say congrats on solid results given all of the challenges that you certainly faced and worked through. Wanted to talk about, George, you said volumes in May were not as soft as anticipated. I'm assuming you're referring a little bit more to the North American operations and maybe just give a little sense of the cadence of the declines that are embedded in the Q2 guidance that you gave. How were we trending in the early part of May and how are we looking in the early part of June? Just trying to get a cadence for how each of the businesses are coming back out.

So, Dan, this is Scott. Let me start with this answer. So we referenced April volumes in George's script. So on a consolidated basis, revenues were down in April about 40% year-over-year. And if we look at May, which we're still closing the books for, but revenue is looking like it trended down about 35% year-over-year. So it improved in May from April by about 5%. Some of that is the fact that Europe started back up in April; our two UK facilities started operating pretty much mid-month and started to ramp up there. Looking into June, we expect further improvement. However, when we were going into May, we thought May was going to be the low water mark for the year and it ended up being, from a volume standpoint, better than April. So that's what gives us some confidence going forward.

I think, this is George. In North America, it was slightly better than we anticipated. I think we were pleasantly surprised and really not knowing what the reaction would be in the UK and certain countries in Continental Europe when they started up, and demand was better than anticipated and optimism seems strong. So, I think that was probably a larger impact on our optimism. North America was better, but as we expected.

And in terms of the furloughs, maybe just give us a sense for how much, what percentage or how much of those have come back online? Really what I'm getting at is, what level of capacity utilization are you operating at across the three businesses today, and would you expect to be back to sort of pre-COVID levels?

So obviously, in the UK, the UK facilities were completely shut down. So, we're probably right now at about 30% to 40% of our capacity. The furlough situation there is different because of their government subsidy plans. In North America, at its highest, we were approximately 30% of our employees being furloughed and we're now below 10% to give you a frame of reference.

Scott, it's impressive to see the free cash flow target remaining strong. What is the working capital benefit included in the guidance of $30 million to $35 million for the year?

Yes, that's tough to answer. But what I can say is compared to where we ended Q2, we absolutely expect some benefit from working inventories down. And then as you may imagine, the accounts receivable and accounts payable side of the business in Q2 suffered a bit because of COVID. We extended some terms on a temporary basis and we expect for those terms to revert back to the original terms here within the quarter. So, we expect working capital to benefit in the second half.

One more for me, I'll jump out. I'm just trying to get a sense for corporate, the SG&A control was up, was obviously very strong. Corporate was actually a benefit, so trying of about $2.5 million in the quarter. So was that mostly reversing compensation accruals, healthcare-related? Trying to get a sense for what drove the change in SG&A on the corporate side and what a good run-rate might be going forward? Thanks.

So, you're right. What drove the benefit was largely driven by compensation accrual reversals obviously, due to the impact from COVID. Medical was lower than we anticipated. And then stock-based compensation was obviously lower, because our stock price took a hit, rebounding nicely today, which is good to see. Going forward, I think $2.5 million a quarter is what we would expect going forward and that would be an expense not a benefit.

Our next question comes from Julio Romero with Sidoti. Your line is open.

I wanted to start on North American fenestration; saw margins rise nicely even with the sales decline. Could you maybe break that out for us from maybe there's structural cost reductions versus more shorter-term expense management?

As we look at that, Julio, I mean the majority of what we saw is structural; you know the short time, and we will have to get back to you on details with the breakout. Obviously, as volume dropped we managed some of the discretionary spending just as you would expect. And it's really hard to determine exactly those pieces when you bridge it out. But I would tell you and I think you've seen this in prior quarters under Bill's guidance and what we were doing. The majority of the things that we've done operationally in cabinets, as well as NAF, are structural in nature and we expected these types of improvements.

I was totally surprised by the margin improvement there. And I know last quarter you guys called out some labor inefficiency in that segment and be related to a specific project. But it sounds like maybe those inefficiencies are under control at this point?

In that specific one that we talked about, we believe that we have that headed in the right direction. Not completely fixed but we saw significant improvement. So yes.

Now, Julio, to be fair, what you're seeing in year-over-year improvement for North America Fenestration and EBITDA margin does include some incentive accrual reversals as well that did help.

And I guess, as we begin to see the market stabilizing. How are you thinking about long-term return on capital allocation? I know you're focused on debt reduction. But do you have any update on some of the internal projects you're considering, especially considering the cash flow that you expect in the back half of the year?

So we talked about the debt reduction; the dividend policy will stay as is. But in terms of our CapEx, we're going to continue to prioritize it based on safety projects. And then there are three or four strategic projects that will continue on. The Extranet vinyl extrusion project, which I mentioned in my script, as well as we'll continue to spend money on screen expansion in the regions where we're underserved right now. So anything related to strategic growth projects we will continue to spend money on.

And just to add to that, Julio with the screens business, we are moving forward, opening a new screens plant here in the August-September timeframe.

Our next question comes from Steven Ramsey with Thompson Research Group.

I guess on the UK plants being shut down now operating again. How much backlog was left sitting and how much of that has been cancelled, or do customers still desire that product? And is there a time lag for those orders to be fulfilled?

We think that the initial demand that we're seeing is backlog related. But the good news that we have in the UK is that their order and opening up did not prohibit people, installers and salespeople from going into the homes, and that continues to remain an unknown. What's the consumer confidence in allowing others into their house. But what I would say is short-term feedback is that that remains pretty strong and people are investing in projects in their own homes.

And then on the cabinet business, I know a mix of the decline was with the customer exiting the business, and then you talked about in the last quarterly calls in the custom stabilizing. I guess is there any way to get a feel for some of custom, how it trends from here? Will it remain in a stabilized state, or could this accelerate decline in the coming quarters?

So we're trying to digest the new KCMA numbers. There was such a rapid change across a lot of the segments. It's really hard to determine what was causing any sort of drop. And so I think that for us to be able to determine the shifts between stock and semi-custom and getting balanced, we're going to need another quarter to look to be able to determine what is that true impact. We anticipate that the conditions are such that people will start looking at the R&R projects and we're seeing signs of that. And we think with wood pricing starting to stabilize, that the semi-custom market that we participate in will be a good place to be.

And then lastly for me, I guess to circle back to the inventory question. You talked about in the last quarterly call how you had built up inventory ahead of large capital investments in North America Fenestration. I guess how does that play out as the quarter moved along? Is that factor passed this or is that part of the inventory work down that you're in the process of?

It is definitely part of our inventory work down. Obviously, you try to build and level load those plants to be able to manage the peaks in the busy time. Right now, as per our forecasts, we're trying to evaluate what that peak will now be; we are bleeding down inventory, so that is part of this process.

Our next question comes from Reuben Garner with Benchmark Company.

So, regarding margins, is there anything fundamentally different from a fixed-variable perspective between the North American Fenestration segment and the Cabinet business? Or is the margin performance this quarter primarily related to challenges faced by some of your cabinet customers being closed? In other words, you managed to improve margins in windows year-over-year despite the circumstances, but experienced some pressure on the Cabinet side?

Without the write-off of the accrual for the customer that left, the inventory accrual, we would have had margin expansion in cabinets as well in the quarter. However, the difference between the two that we called out is truly managing that fixed cost piece when we have certain customers that did shut down for cabinets, and we didn't see that in North American Fenestration. So that's really the difference. Our customer base on the NAF side, almost every customer was deemed essential and on the cabinet side, we did have some. So you had to continue running the plants on the cabinet side at less than ideal run rates and levels to support the ones that are still running. So that's the biggest difference, Reuben.

And then maybe on the guidance for Q3. So I think if I'm reading it correctly, it's implying somewhere the quarter being down in 25% to 30% range. So, a little bit better than the trend you're seeing in May. I'm a little surprised that you're still expecting those types of declines. Do you have any way of breaking down what your new business looks like relative to your repair and remodel business? I know that might be difficult. But the reason I'm asking is a lot of the builders seem to be pretty optimistic and I think in fact even already started to bounce back in May. Is it the new construction site that's going to fare a lot better and the R&R side might not, because people are hesitant to have contractors come into their home to do things like replace kitchen cabinets? Can you just talk to us about what you're hearing and seeing there?

I think we are seeing, or we are hearing optimism from our customers as well. So I think what we're dealing with right now is where we're at in the supply chain. You have our customers also trying to work through inventory levels and adjust. So where we're at in the supply chain, it's just delayed. So we won't see the impact of some of this for a little longer than those builders and some of the OEMs. But we're definitely hearing optimism, Reuben. And we think as people reduce their travel and some of the larger expenses on that type of thing, they're going to invest, and we're seeing more of that type of investment in their homes and living spaces, and we see more of that optimism. There's a lot of comments that housing will lead to recovery, and we are hearing that.

And then last one from me, I mean obviously, some of the states that were shut down, you're going to see it. But any notable regional disparity in your markets that’s worth calling out other than New York? Anything that you've noticed trend-wise that certain markets are bouncing back stronger or faster than others?

I think, you know for us and it goes consistent with what we were seeing in quarters before. For us, the Southwest, South Central, and Southeast continue to remain strong or stronger. From the cabinet side, the shutdowns were primarily in the Northwest. Washington did not deem their cabinet customers as essential and neither did Pennsylvania. So that was where we saw some short-term hits in those regions for the cabinet side.

We have a follow-up question from Daniel Moore from CJS Securities. Your line is open.

Just on capital allocation, I guess number one, any thoughts, like M&A has sort of been on the back burner for quite a while. Any thoughts that the disruptions might shake loose a few tuck-ins and opportunities, or was it just too short-lived, number one? And number two, obviously you took very prudent actions focusing on cash preservation as this was going on. What would you need to see to be more comfortable, more confident in maybe allocating capital or returning cash to shareholders more aggressively once again? Thanks.

In terms of the M&A, my comment is, listen, we'll listen and we'll continue to look at opportunities as they come to us. We think there will be a pause in that area as everyone's going to be trying to understand what true valuations are all about and where that should be. So, I think both the selling and the buying are going to be very cautious, as will we. So not that we wouldn't look at anything; we just think that there will be a natural pause. And we're going to put ourselves in the position by the tactics we are doing now and building and protecting our balance sheet to be ready when that does break. In terms of providing cash back to the shareholders, I think we're really going to need to see at least another quarter. I mean, it's constantly talked at the Board level, and they're very cognizant of doing things to provide value to our shareholders. But we want at least another quarter to see what we can determine and some look into 2021, I think, before we really make that decision permanently.

That concludes today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call back to George Wilson for closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining. And we look forward to providing an update on our next earnings call in September. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.