Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Universal's Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Arash Soleimani, Chief Strategy Officer.

Good morning. Thank you for joining us today. Welcome to our quarterly earnings call. On the call with me today are Steve Donaghy, Chief Executive Officer; and Frank Wilcox, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, please note today's discussion may contain forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial measures. Forward-looking statements involve assumptions, risks, and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements. For more information, please see the press release and Universal's SEC filing, all of which are available on the Investors section of our website at universalinsuranceholdings.com and on the SEC's website. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to comparable GAAP measures is included in the quarterly press release and can also be found on Universal's website at universalinsuranceholdings.com. With that, I'll turn the call over to Steve.

Thanks, Arash. Good morning, everyone. The third quarter benefited from strong and improving underlying trends, and I'm optimistic as I look forward. During this time, Hurricane Idalia made landfall in Florida, and as always, we were there immediately to assist our policyholders in their time of need. The storm severity appears considerably smaller than initially anticipated and is comfortably absorbed within our retention. We continue to enhance our best-in-class claims structure, which, together with our reinsurance capabilities, serves to differentiate us from our peers. As we look forward, we are more confident in the Florida market, which is our largest geography, and have started to slowly increase new business in additional territories. In the third quarter, we completed the commutation of Hurricane Irma with the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund among partial commutations with private reinsurers for other storms as well. We're pleased to have these transactions behind us, and as we look ahead, we expect future storms to be more predictable and efficient given the benefits of recent legislation. I'll turn it over to Frank to walk through our financial results.

Thanks, Steve. Good morning. Adjusted loss per common share was $0.16 compared to an adjusted loss per common share of $2.27 in the prior year quarter. The improvement mostly stems from higher underwriting income and net investment income. Core revenue of $361.8 million was up 14.2% year-over-year with growth primarily stemming from higher net premiums earned and net investment income. Direct premiums written were $532 million, up 6.3% from the prior year quarter, including 4.4% growth in Florida and 14.7% growth in other states. Overall growth reflects rate increases partially offset by lower policies in force. Direct premiums earned were $474.3 million, up 4.8% from the prior year quarter, reflecting rate-driven direct premiums written growth over the last 12 months. Net premiums earned were $331 million, up 13.9% from the prior year quarter. The increase is primarily attributable to higher direct premiums earned and a lower ceded premium ratio. The net combined ratio was 110.7%, down 28.5 points compared to the prior year quarter. The decrease reflects lower net loss and expense ratios. The net loss ratio was 87%, down 26.7 points compared to the prior year quarter, with the decrease attributable to a lower consolidated current accident year net loss ratio, primarily stemming from lower weather-related losses. The net expense ratio improved by 1.8 points compared to the prior year quarter, primarily reflecting lower renewal commission rates paid to distribution partners. During the third quarter, the company repurchased approximately 894,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $12.3 million. The company currently has $7.8 million of share repurchase authorization remaining. On July 20, 2023, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share of common stock, payable on August 11, 2023, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 4, 2023. With that said, I'd like to ask the operator to open the line for questions.

Thank you. And it comes from the line of Nick Iacoviello with Dowling & Partners. Please proceed.

Good morning, guys. Just first off, what were the net losses from Idalia in the quarter?

Hey, Nick, good morning. Yeah, we set Idalia at a $45 million loss at this point, which is well within the company's net retention. And we do not expect to hit our SaaS lease coverage above $45 million.

Got it. And would that be the only — that $45 million — would that be what you classify as weather above plan? Or are there other events that you saw as well?

There were other events in the quarter, and none of them were of a magnitude that we would have reported separately. But consolidated, they're probably in the area of another $10 million or $15 million.

Got it. And then just maybe a comment on the commutations. I guess, could you quantify the gross and net prior year development incurred in the quarter? And how much of that related to these commutations?

Yeah. Sure, Nick. Great question. We knew that we were going to be commuting Irma and other storms in Q3 of this year just based on the schedule laid out by the state of Florida. So at the end of 2022, we created an accrual at Alder, which of course, is the organization that handles all our adjusting and benefits directly from that adjusting. So we created an accrual that we took into account. And as we logically got to the run-up of the commutation, particularly on Irma, we released that accrual to reimburse UPCIC for the funds in that commutation. And as you are aware, Nick, in 2017, the LAE reimbursement by the state was 5%, and as you know, the reimbursement for LAE is typically in the area of 15% to 25% on average. So we knew we had some funds we were going to need. We put up a certain amount for the commutation of Irma, which is around $15 million, and about another $2.8 million to $2.7 million for Sally. So those were the totals that, had we not been prepared for them through the accrual at the end of '22.

Okay. And sorry just to make sure I'm understanding that. So on a fully consolidated basis, excuse me, is what was the net adverse then from that, right? That's just between subsidiary and claims adjustment?

Yes. So at the end of last year, as Steve pointed out, we put up an accrual at Alder in anticipation of participating in the ultimate outcome of these commutations. So as UPCIC incurs prior development in the current year, it will receive a refund from Alder, which in effect will replenish reserves from which those payments could be made.

Okay. Got it. All right. I guess I just had one more macro I guess. Specific to Hurricane Ian, right, it seems like the reinsurers and the cat modeling firms are still holding on to that $50 billion industry loss figure. But I mean it looks like ground-up losses from the primaries are implying a lower amount than that. I'm wondering what you guys have seen in terms of claims development, if you had a similar view in losses trending lower than that $50 billion at the industry level?

Nick, there's so much involved in the industry level that I'm going to leave that to those experts. We pegged Ian as a $1 billion event. And through the development thus far and the benefits of the timing, we're sticking with the $1 billion estimate that we released at the time of the hurricane. And we feel good about that number as we sit here, even taking into account IBNR and other things in the future.

All right. That’s all I had. Thank you.

One moment for our next questions please. It comes from the line of Paul Newsome with Piper Sandler. Please proceed.

Good morning. Sorry, I got myself a little confused here, but could you talk a little bit more about reserve impacts in the quarter, positive or negative? Start with there just to straighten that.

Yes. So the biggest difference year-over-year when you look at the net ratio, which was I think $113.7 million for the three months ended '22 versus 87% this year. The biggest difference would be the impact from Ian last year, which on a consolidated basis was $111 million versus the $45 million. So the net loss ratio changed by 26 points. That difference in the impact from the storms was about 25 points of that. And then comparatively speaking, prior year development of the $17.7 million that Steve highlighted compares to $2.7 million last year, so that's a $15 million difference. And then, of course, Alder continues to adjust claims for the Ian storm; they generated profits of about $18.7 million versus $5 million. So that's a little bit of an offset there. But when you kind of flush that away, the biggest impact would be the difference in the storms year over year.

Right. So, are we looking at sort of ex cat, ex reserve development improvements? Or if we adjust all that, and maybe talking about prospectively from that perspective as well?

Well, right now, I mean, we see a lot of favorable trends from an operational standpoint — number of claims coming in, number of represented claims, litigated claims, the benefit of which will manifest in the future, and that's all coming from the favorable legislation. But as we stand here today, we're being conservative in our current accident year loss pick. So when you're looking at the larger of the two insurance entities, we're booking to a higher pick this year so far for the first nine months than we were — than we were for the first nine months of last year.

Could we maybe explore that a little bit more why the loss pick is up not down? You're pushing through an enormous amount of rate — you've had obviously — I guess there's some peg of claims inflation in there. But then I guess there's no benefit from potential tort reform in that peg as well is that kind of the way to think about it? Or is there something you want to be thought of there?

Well, I think, Paul, we need to — we look at it from a conservative perspective. And as we've talked about, the legislation still hasn't impacted our entire book of business. So as that flows through the book of business, and as we look to the future, we see a lot of very positive developments that I believe will be reflected in future years. And again, when we look into the future, we look at potential rate reductions in Florida as a result of the legislation. We see a lot of positive impacts. And as you know, the repurchase decision in the quarter reflects our optimism as we look forward as a result of a whole lot of things impacting our business.

I think that's very fair. I guess the actual question is, why have a higher peg if you're pushing for I think like 20%-ish price increases? That would imply that the underlying cost inflation is even higher than that 20%. Is that just an overly simplified way to look at it? Or putting aside the impact of total?

Well, I think, again, the rate reductions always run 12 months in arrears, right? So this year we had a rate indication which was almost double the rate that we took, which reflected our optimism from the legislative changes going into the future. So we put that aside. And then I think we build conservatism into our reserves to ensure that we have plenty of funds moving forward to adjudicate our business and keep the company in the most healthy position in the future.

Appreciate the help as always, guys. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Paul.

Thank you. And I don't see any further questions in the queue. I will turn the call back to Steve Donaghy for final comments.

Thank you, Carmen. Appreciate it. I'd like to thank all of our associates, consumers, our agency force, and our stakeholders for their continued support of Universal. Have a great weekend.

And with that, we thank you for your participation.