Good afternoon. My name is Lauren and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Zillow Group's Third Quarter 2023 Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute, to prevent any background noise. Please note this event is being recorded. I would like to turn the conference over to Bradley Berning, Vice President Strategic Affairs and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Lauren. Good afternoon and welcome to Zillow Group's third quarter 2023 conference call. Joining me today to discuss our results are Zillow Group's Co-Founder and CEO, Rich Barton, CFO, Jeremy Hofmann and COO, Jeremy Wacksman. During today's call, we'll make forward-looking statements about our future performance and operating plans and the housing market based on current expectations and assumptions. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and we encourage you to consider the risk factors described in our SEC filings for additional information. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events, except as required by law. This call is being broadcast on the Internet and is accessible on our Investor Relations website. Recording of the call will be available later today. During the call, we will discuss GAAP and non-GAAP measures, including adjusted EBITDA which we refer to as EBITDA. We encourage you to read our shareholder letter and our earnings release, which can be found on our Investor Relations website, as they contain important information about our GAAP and non-GAAP results, including reconciliations of historical non-GAAP financial measures. We will now open the call with remarks followed by live Q&A. And with that, I will turn the call now over to Rich.

Thank you, Brad. And thanks, Lauren. Good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you dialing in today to hear our third quarter 2023 results. I'm looking forward to sharing the progress we've made on our growth strategy as we yet again, meaningfully outperformed the industry by making steady executional progress, converting traffic into transactions. Before I get to our results, and an update on our five growth pillars, it's important that I address the high level of media attention and speculation surrounding several ongoing industry lawsuits, and what the implications may be for the broader residential real estate industry and for Zillow in particular. The short version is, we strongly believe Zillow is well positioned to thrive regardless of how it all plays out. I'll explain our logic. But first, let me be clear on the marketplace principles that underlie Zillow’s stance. With respect to free, fair and transparent access to real estate information, we are strong supporters. With respect to the importance of independent representation, we are strong supporters. And finally, with respect to transparent and negotiable agent commissions, we are strong supporters. From where we stand it seems clear that these principles are in the best interest of consumers, agents, and the industry as a whole. Consumers and agents should have access to all listings and consumers should be empowered with information about listings and how agent commissions get paid. We believe this is the best way forward. Now regarding litigation news, we expect the Sitzer/Burnett lawsuit that made headlines yesterday, in which a jury ruled in favor of plaintiffs and awarded approximately $1.8 billion in damages will likely be tied up in court for years. Defendants in that case such as the National Association of Realtors, and certain real estate franchisors have already indicated that they intend to pursue an appeals process unless there's some negotiated settlement. As a reminder to you all, Zillow is not a party to this lawsuit nor other similar ones. Aside from how long this particular case may take to fully play out, we expect industry changes resulting from this lawsuit, or ones like it will involve commission transparency and negotiability provisions similar to those seen in several of the settlements plaintiffs entered into with other real estate franchisors in advance of the trial. These industry changes would tend to look like good initial steps that add more transparency and education for consumers. In forward-leaning markets that have been exploring changes that result in increased transparency and negotiability, we believe our business thrives. We also believe complete disruption to the existence of buyer's agents is improbable for a few reasons. Why? Because buyer's agents represent the buyer's interest throughout this complex and often intimidating process of purchasing a home, the biggest purchase most people make in their lifetime, for which most people take on huge debt, and which has ended up being for most homeowners their largest financial asset. Similar to other infrequent high complexity, high-stakes transactions, independent representation in real estate is important. An analogy would be that investment bankers don't represent both the buyer and the seller in an M&A deal because it makes no logical sense that one advisor could effectively represent the best interests of both parties. In fact, dual agency where the same individual listing agent represents both parties or double siding is harmful enough in the real estate transaction that it's already been banned or substantially restricted in eight states in the U.S. Buyers deserve and most need their own independent counsel. For most buyers, this means a dedicated agent. There is always a DIY or do-it-yourself segment of any industry. And we fully support DIY inside of Zillow today, while knowing via research and experience that for most movers, the stakes are too high for DIY. So I'll remind you that Zillow was founded on the first principle of free and fair access to real estate information and listings; we have not wavered. We continue to adhere to this principle and assert our position by advocating and lobbying in favor of more transparency in real estate, the benefits and durability of independent buyer representation, and the importance of transparent and negotiable commissions. We believe change in the industry has been and will be slow but will continually bend towards these principles. However, indulging for a moment a future scenario where buyer's agency does go away, we have high confidence that Zillow will remain in a strong position, potentially even stronger. Why? Because then the U.S market would likely transition to a market structure that we observe in several international geographies where one or two large portals offer a pay-to-play paid inclusion digital listings marketplace, sort of a digital classified advertising analogy. In this scenario, Zillow would be an odds-on favorite to become the leading digital listings marketplace given our brand, traffic, engagement, and our unique focus on solving movers’ real pain points with our software-anchored housing super app vision. If international classifieds markets are any guide, it is also possible that this leads to a larger and more profitable business model for Zillow. Are we advocating for this to happen? No, because we believe a pay-to-play marketplace is a step backwards for consumers and the industry as a whole. And we very much like our position and growth plan in a market structure that continues to evolve towards our principles of access, independence, and transparency. Let me wrap this section up by reiterating that we have always focused first on delighting the masses with software products that attract users with modest marketing spend. Those who know us well know that over the years, we have exhibited an unusually high degree of business model creativity and innovation, as we have figured out how to monetize our incredible user engagement in ways that are a win-win-win: a win for consumers, a win for our partners, and a win for Zillow. This experimentation and innovation has resulted in a revenue roll-up today that features a wide variety of lines of business and monetization models, to the point where revenue derived from buyer agent activity represented less than 50% of our total revenue in Q3. Today, we are focused on delivering the housing Super App, a tech-enabled end-to-end platform with products and services that make it easier for people to move. Zillow, the trusted brand and marketplace will be here to help buyers, sellers, renters and the industry transact in real estate, regardless of how the dollars flow. Now that we've covered what's happening in the industry, I'm excited to share our results with you. You've heard me say many times that 2023 is crucial for Zillow; it's a year of execution as we prepare to scale in 2024 and 2025. We're very pleased with what we've accomplished today. We again delivered strong relative outperformance compared to total industry transaction dollar volumes. We reported better than expected and continued positive revenue growth of $496 million in Q3, up 3% year-over-year. Residential revenue of $362 million declined by only 3% year-over-year while the broader market declined by 14%, meaning Zillow outperformed the industry by 1,100 basis points. This quarter now marks the fourth straight quarter of meaningful outperformance versus the industry. Our ongoing efforts to improve our customer funnel, capture more demand and connect more of that demand to our partner network continue to pay dividends for our performance. A contributor to our outperformance was a great quarter in our Rentals marketplace. Driven by increased traffic and listing growth in both multi-family and single-family, we reported $99 million in revenue in Rentals this quarter, up 34% year-over-year. We remain the number one most visited Rentals platform according to comScore with average monthly Rental unique visitors of double digits year-over-year in Q3. We believe this positions us well for future revenue growth. We're also making excellent progress in mortgages, growing our purchase mortgage originations business by 88% year-over-year, even as mortgage rates hit 20-year highs. Our core business continues to demonstrate healthy top-of-funnel demand driven by our powerful brand, with 224 million average monthly unique users in the third quarter, our overall leading traffic is double that of our next competitor. And a nod to our broad awareness and trust. More than 80% of our users come to us organically, directly, and for free. Less than 5% of our users come from paid SEM and digital acquisition. Our great product, respected brand, and large audience are a meaningful strategic advantage for Zillow. This is the foundation upon which we invest in and build out our growth pillars, all of which are focused on increasing conversion by simplifying, digitizing, and integrating the complex, scary and expensive real estate transaction, real customer problems that we're solving with great software and great partners. Before we get to our roadmap update, I'm excited to speak about our just signed agreement to acquire Follow Up Boss, an industry-leading CRM, customer relationship management system that gives top-performing real estate professionals a central hub to organize and engage customers, close deals, and build their teams. We're investing in great tech solutions that make it easier for people to move, and Follow Up Boss does just that. They have bootstrapped an industry-leading CRM platform from the ground up. It's a great product, one that is beloved by agents and teams across the industry, and currently used by many Zillow premier agent partners and showing time plus clients. We are excited to be able to use Zillow’s resources to help Follow Up Boss grow even faster and to invest in a more integrated software experience for agents and teams across the industry, enabling them to boost productivity and grow their own businesses. Jeremy will speak in more detail about this proposed acquisition shortly. Zillow’s housing Super App vision is to create a single digital experience to help customers across their real estate needs including buying, selling, financing, and renting, serving as one ecosystem of connected solutions for all the tasks and services related to moving. We're bringing this vision to life through investments across five growth pillars: touring, financing, seller solutions, integrating our services, and enhancing our partner network. These five growth pillars mark the pathway to meeting our goals for increased transaction share and revenue per customer transaction. This past year we've been focused on launching, learning, and refining products and services within our growth pillars. As we scale and grow over the coming years, we are making progress as demonstrated by our accelerated product rollouts this quarter. Our efforts are improving our mid-funnel conversion, and with that our connection volumes across the business as we focus on driving real value through customer transactions. We've been encouraged by what we're learning in the geographies where we enroll that are most full-featured in integrated housing super app experience, our enhanced markets. Since we last spoke, we launched five more enhanced markets bringing us to a total of nine. As each month passes, we are increasingly confident in the results we are seeing in our enhanced markets and are encouraged by continued strong connections growth and customer transaction share gains. We anticipate launching additional enhanced markets at an accelerated pace in the months ahead and throughout 2024. Additionally, the investments we're making to improve touring, a key growth pillar will continue to fuel momentum. A home tour is the moment that a dreamed-about home viewed on our Zillow app becomes a reality for the first time. Raising one's digital hand to take a physical tour is a strong indicator of seriousness, and those shoppers who requested a tour convert to buyers at three times the rate of other actions on Zillow. Getting ready to buy starts with getting in the door physically. Powered by showing time, a real-time touring product lets a home shopper schedule and confirm a home tour in real-time as opposed to simply requesting it. Along with other improvements we've made throughout the conversion funnel, real-time touring is meaningfully improving our ability to connect higher-intent customers through our premiere agent partners. Wherever real-time touring is enabled, we continue to see significant outperformance of our overall connections growth versus the industry. As a result, we've accelerated the rollout of real-time touring independent of our enhanced markets. We are currently live in 57 markets and expect to be in an additional 33 covering approximately 10% of our total connections by the end of 2023. Exciting progress. Another pain point in the customer's moving journey is securing financing, the second of our growth pillars. As I've said before, nearly 80% of homes purchased are financed with a mortgage. Approximately 40% of all homebuyers start their journey shopping for a mortgage before deciding on an agent to work with. Knowing that almost all of these mortgage seekers use Zillow sets us up very nicely to build a substantial first-party direct-to-consumer purchase mortgage origination business seamlessly integrated with our extensive premier agent partner network. We began to show real traction over the last few quarters. That growth continued in Q3, and despite a historically horrendous mortgage origination market, Zillow Home Loans reported an 88% year-over-year increase in purchase loan origination volume. Traditionally, Zillow customers went to our mortgage marketplace to shop for rates. Increasingly, those customers are being offered Zillow Home Loans directly. Those customers, along with our work to integrate premier agents with Zillow Home Loans in our enhanced markets, are driving the growth of Zillow Home Loans purchase mortgages. We are not yet at scale, but we are making excellent progress with $452 million in purchase loan originations during Q3, even as mortgage rates hit 20-year highs. I'll now move on to the final growth pillar and our roadmap update, Seller Solutions. As you know, we are investing here to provide sellers and listing agents with tech-enabled products and services that make selling homes easier, a big TAM that we have targeted and been innovating against for quite some time. Last quarter, we launched Listing Showcase under our ShowingTime+ broad real estate industry software brands. Listing Showcase listings feature rich media like scrolling hero images, room-by-room photo organization, and interactive floor plans giving buyers a deep understanding of the home before they ever step inside. We're providing agents industry-wide the tools to highlight a home's best features while also providing them an opportunity to elevate their brand presence on Zillow, which should lead to future business. The response has been quite positive so far. As of today, we are in 17 markets with plans to expand throughout Q4 and beyond. Additionally, with respect to opening up sell-side TAM with Seller Solutions, we've expanded our partnership with our iBuying leader Opendoor to 45 markets as of last week. In these markets, home sellers who start their journey on Zillow can simultaneously request a cash offer from Opendoor as well as an estimate of what their home could sell for on the open market with a local Zillow premier agent partner. The myriad of progress we're reporting against our growth pillar investments and the announcement of an agreement to acquire industry-leading CRM software provider Follow Up Boss paint a picture of a company that has a clear and exciting vision for a digital seamless integrated and efficient transaction in the messy, scary land of a regular person who wants or needs to move. Before I pass things over to CFO, Jeremy Hofmann, I want to commend the extended Zillow team for working hard and successfully on solving real-world concrete consumer problems by great software and great partners. This work requires a high degree of smart, skill, and coordination as we roll out our services together and separately to an increasingly broad set of geographies. While industry noise is loud and the macro drag heavy, our team is executing very well, and it is showing up in our continued relative outperformance and the excitement we all feel about the growth opportunity ahead. With that, I will turn it over to Jeremy.

Thanks, Rich, and hello, everyone. I am pleased to discuss details about our Q3 results as well as our outlook for continued total revenue growth in a very tough macro environment. In my comments today, I will also discuss our agreement to acquire Follow Up Boss as well as how we are currently thinking about share-based compensation or SBC within the framework of our overall cost structure. In Q3, we delivered continued positive year-over-year revenue growth, up 3% to $496 million and $24 million above the midpoint of our outlook range. On a GAAP basis, net loss was $28 million, representing 6% of our revenue. Q3 EBITDA of $107 million resulted in a 22% EBITDA margin. Our revenue outperformance combined with effective cost management drove $30 million of EBITDA outperformance above the midpoint of our outlook range, demonstrating the high incremental margin business we have today. Residential revenue was $362 million, outperforming the high end of our outlook range, down 3% year-over-year. Our residential revenue performance was 1,100 basis points above the industry decline of 14% according to data from the National Association of Realtors. Our internal calculations, which count the number of residential home sales in every market across the country, suggest that the industry was down slightly more in Q3 than even in our numbers indicate. In Q3, we believe our relative outperformance was primarily driven by things that we are doing to grow and less by relative macro factors. Our ongoing investment in our top-of-funnel and mid-funnel experiences continue to drive improvements in our overall lead volumes when compared to the industry. Rentals revenue growth accelerated in Q3, with revenue increasing 34% year-over-year to $99 million, primarily driven by our multifamily revenue, which grew 42% year-over-year in Q3. Growth in our Rentals marketplace is being driven by four factors. First, our Rentals team has executed on accelerating the year-over-year growth in the number of multifamily properties on our apps and sites, growing 28% in Q3, up from 21% in Q2 and 14% in Q1. Second, the total active listings across our entire Rentals marketplace was up 45% year-over-year. Third, the increase in active Rentals listings is driving our industry-leading Rentals traffic which was up 11% year-over-year to 30 million average monthly Rentals unique visitors per ComScore. Last, the occupancy rates have declined from historically high levels driving the need for landlords to advertise their vacant rental properties with us. Mortgages revenue was $24 million, with purchased loan origination volume growing 35% sequentially from Q2 and 88% year-over-year. We have made solid progress each quarter this year to help more of our customers get financing through Zillow Home Loans. This is being driven by adding new tools and integration capabilities as a bridge between Premier Agents and our loan officers as well as directing more customer requests to Zillow Home Loans rather than sending them to third parties via our marketplace. EBITDA expenses in Q3 totaled $389 million, slightly better than what was implied by our outlook. With select operating expenses slightly lower, as a result of selective actions we took in Q3 as part of ongoing efforts to streamline the business and prioritize investments. We also shifted $3 million of our advertising expenses from Q3 to Q4. Cost of revenue increased $21 million or 24% year-over-year primarily due to an increase in website development costs as we continue to release and test new products. We ended Q3 with $3.3 billion of cash and investments, flat compared to the end of Q2, which includes the benefit of net cash provided by operating activities as well as the impact of $100 million in share repurchases during Q3. Convertible debt was $1.7 billion at the end of Q3. Turning to our outlook for Q4. We expect total revenue to be between $430 million and $455 million, implying a year-over-year increase of 2% at the midpoint of our outlook range. This compares to our estimate for an existing home industry transaction dollar decline between 8% and 13% year-over-year in Q4. We expect a total industry decline of 10% at the midpoint of the range to nominally improve compared to the Q3 decline of 14%. Despite these ongoing headwinds, we expect to outperform the industry in Q4 as the investments we have made in our funnel continue to deliver benefits. We expect residential revenue to be between $316 million and $334 million, down 4.5% year-over-year at the midpoint of our outlook range. For Premier Agent, we estimate revenue will decline between 4% to 9% year-over-year. Despite the tough macro existing home sales environment, our customer connections with Premier Agents have outperformed the industry consistently throughout 2023, and we expect this outperformance to continue into Q4. That said, we remain cautious around housing affordability challenges and the low inventory environment. We saw in Q3 and expect to continue to see in Q4, headwinds for prospective buyers who are finding it increasingly difficult to purchase a home. We have factored this into our outlook accordingly. Implied in our guidance for non-residential revenue, which includes rentals, mortgages, and other revenue categories, is 24% year-over-year growth at the midpoint of our outlook range. An acceleration from 21% growth in Q3. We expect rentals revenue to grow more than 30% year-over-year in Q4 as we continue to benefit from the strength of our execution. We also expect positive growth in mortgages revenue year-over-year in Q4 as we lap the refinance activity of a year ago and begin to scale the internalization of our marketplace leads. For Q4, we expect EBITDA to be between $40 million and $60 million, implying an 11% margin at the midpoint of our outlook range. We expect EBITDA to be down sequentially from Q3 due to seasonality of revenue. Excluding the impact of the timing of $3 million of advertising expenses that moved from Q3 to Q4, we expect EBITDA expenses to be relatively flat sequentially. We have made reductions in fixed costs during Q3 that will flow into Q4 that we are reinvesting into revenue-producing variable headcount as we see increased traction across our business. We expect to continue to hire loan officers as we accelerate the pace of our enhanced market rollout into 2024. We also expect to hire salespeople for Listing Showcase as we expand the product to more markets heading into 2024. One item that we have not included in our outlook for Q4 is a potential one-time charge related to a lease agreement amendment we recently signed to reduce our Seattle office space. We estimate that we will record a one-time charge of $15 million included in EBITDA, if and when the landlord exercises their partial termination option, which we believe likely in either Q4 or Q1 2024. Excluding the impact of that one-time charge, if the partial termination option is exercised in Q4 this year, we estimate that our 2024 facilities costs would decrease by $10 million, and we would release an estimated $39 million in EBITDA expenses in total over the remaining life of the Seattle lease, which more than makes up for the one-time hit to our EBITDA. Now on to the announcement we made to acquire Follow Up Boss, an industry-leading customer relationship management system for real estate professionals. We are excited about Follow Up Boss for several reasons. First, they have been a key integration partner of ours for a long time, and the product is beloved by the broader real estate industry and many of our Zillow Premier Agent partners. Follow Up Boss has grown its revenue more than 40% on average annually over the last four years, primarily through word-of-mouth marketing with no meaningful outbound sales efforts. This type of growth is quite a feat in any market environment, and even more impressive in a housing market that is down nearly 20% since 2019. Further, the business has been profitable and growing for the last 11 years and is expected to grow more than 20% in 2023. Similar to our acquisition of ShowingTime in 2021, Follow Up Boss gives agents across the industry a tech-enabled solution that allows them to focus on what they do best, delivering great experiences to customers. Also similar to ShowingTime, Follow Up Boss will remain an independent brand, serving the broader real estate industry as they've done so well for so many years. The purchase price includes $400 million of cash upon closing and up to $100 million in cash earn-out over a three-year period upon achievement of certain performance metrics. We estimate that we are paying upfront approximately 18 times Follow Up Boss's 2024 cash EBITDA on a standalone basis. Once the transaction closes, the Follow Up Boss team will join Zillow as our newest industry offering for real estate agents. Now I'm going to cover our cost structure. First, I want to reiterate what I walked through on our last earnings call. We evaluate costs in three categories: fixed, variable, and advertising. For our fixed cost base, I would like to reemphasize that we believe we are around the right levels of fixed cost to execute on the opportunities we see ahead. Similar to what we did in Q3, we are actively seeking to find efficiencies in our fixed costs to offset the inherent inflation in the fixed infrastructure. While we expect to grow variable costs as we scale our business, we intend to drive operating leverage over time. We will dial our spend up and down for advertising, depending on the environment and opportunities we see to build awareness and drive growth. We will assess advertising levels with that lens, separate and distinct from the rest of the cost base. Before we open up the line for Q&A, I'd like to give you all some additional detail on how we look at share-based compensation and how it fits in our cost structure. Since taking over as CFO in May, I've spent time with many of you on this topic. We understand investors' concerns about the relatively high level of SBC expense, as a percentage of revenue, during this period of time when the macroeconomic environment is pressuring revenue, and we are forward investing to drive future growth. Historically, SBC represents a meaningful portion of compensation for many of our employees, and we give employees the choice of selecting RSUs or option awards each year. However, we see SBC as an expense that should be leverageable on a per-employee basis as we grow revenue. Going forward, it is important to note that approximately 90% of our current SBC expense is related to fixed-cost employees. If you model our fixed and variable EBITDA costs, that we provided last quarter, plus an assumption for marketing while holding SBC expense flat per head count, you will see we can be a GAAP profitable company over time as we drive revenue growth. In addition to monitoring our SBC expense, we also focused on our share dilution related to employee equity awards. Since 2018, we have granted an average annual net share dilution of 3.2%, while the realized annual net dilution for employee equity awards has averaged 2.5%. More recently, the August 2022 retention grants combined with the annual grant issued in 2022, drove annual granted net dilution of 5.2%. While the realized annual net dilution was just 2% that same year. With all that said, we want to reiterate that becoming a GAAP profitable company over time is important to us. To get there, we expect to get leverage from our SBC expense as we grow revenue. To close, I'll reiterate what you have heard from us before. 2022 was a year where we restrategized and reorganized around our Housing Super App vision. 2023 is a year for us to release new products and test in various markets, setting us up for further scaling in 2024 and 2025. We are three quarters through the year and are pleased with how we are progressing. And with that, operator, we'll open up the line for questions.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Brad Erickson from RBC. Brad, please go ahead.

Yes, thanks. Good afternoon. So one for Rich first, appreciate the thoughts about the lawsuits and potential changes going on in the industry. Maybe if we could talk through an outcome where the buyer's agent remains, but commissions get pressured more significantly, maybe talk about some of the effects and impacts the business might see under that scenario? And then I have a follow-up for Jeremy if I could. Thanks.

Okay. Hey, Brad. Yes, thanks. So kind of the middle path scenario. So why don't I try to do a little bit more freeform restatement of what I said in my script, the comments first, Brad, and kind of set the answer up. And then I might toss it over to Jeremy Wacksman to answer your middle path question specifically, which we feel good about our position as in the middle path scenario. But overall, I just want to reiterate that, our kind of the short version of what how we think this plays out. And any changes that might come is that we're positioned really, really well for all weather. Okay, and that is based on some fundamental marketplace principles that we believe in one, free and fair, transparent access to real estate information and listings, that is how we were founded, turned on the lights, we believe a well-lit game is cleaner and more equitable. The second principle is independent representation. People deserve and need independent representation. We've seen double citing in the industry, which is clearly a conflict, and at certain times more expensive for the - to the transaction. We do support DIY - the people who want to do DIY and we have a pretty healthy DIY FSBO marketplace. But in most instances movers want and need counsel. And we think that takes the form of a buyer's agent. And then finally, transparency and negotiability of commissions, which some markets have been moving towards, and we think other markets are going to begin to move more quickly towards because of these legal actions. So how will this play out? I said this already, it's likely the legal process is likely to take years, it's highly complex, it's politically fraught. There are millions of potential employees and people affected in every state. As I just said, I think the industry will move quickly towards these more transparent and negotiable rules that we have begun to see in several markets. I think we'll see that more quickly. But I guess, I would say we don't believe that this scenario, the most radical path, the complete disruption of the existence of a buyer's agent, we believe it's improbable. And I guess I would say mostly because consumers really want and need and deserve representation. But I've been through that. Okay. But entertain the notion where it does happen. All right, we think what happens is listings marketplaces fragment. And we switch to a much more pay to play model like we see in some international geographies, we look more like a pay to play pay for enhanced representation merchandising, kind of like digital classifieds. If you think about that scenario, who set up to do well, it’s who has the biggest audience, the best, most trusted brand, the most information, and Zillow is in a really good position there. We've observed in those international markets, this friction fee on the transaction is actually higher than we see in the commission world in the U.S. It is actually a more opaque, more fragmented, and therefore an opportunity for more profit exists. And that is what we've seen in international markets and so it's possible. It could be even better economics, but we don't like that; we think it's bad for consumers. We think it's less efficient. We think it's less fair. We think it's more expensive. I'll begin my wrap up and hand it over to Wacksman by saying that I made I made a point I don't know if Jeremy Hofmann reiterated but I made a point that we are really well diversified business net business now and getting even more diversified, rentals, mortgages, real estate software, new construction, showcase, these are all growers for Follow Up Boss, we will add to this, these are all growers all big TAMs and now account together for the majority of our revenues. So I guess, in the end, the consumer is our north star that has served us really, really well so far. Having engaged customers and solving real problems with software and partners means that we are really well insulated, regardless of how the dollars end up flowing. So sorry to bore you with all that again, but I thought I'd get it out. Let's talk about the middle path though, Jeremy Wacksman, you maybe want to give me a little relief?

Yes, happy to. Yes. Thanks, Brad. I mean, in a world where there are fewer dollars to go around. I mean, I think similar to what Rich said, we feel really well positioned, and we love our strategy. And I think the investments that we are making in tech and in the transaction itself and helping more customers become even more valuable for the most productive agents. As a reminder, our strategy is to partner with the best teams and agents, and as such, our partner base are those that are likely going to gain share from the part-time or the less productive or effective agents and the participants in the marketplace that might find themselves even more challenged in a world like that. And then it's to hand those partners higher-intent customers; Rich talked a lot about our Super App strategy that is about driving higher intent, higher-quality customers, buyers and sellers in the process of transacting to those partners. And so touring, our financing experience, our Seller Services are all doing that and then helping those partners become more productive, close more deals, and be able to be more efficient in a world powered by software. So we get pretty excited about the value and services we provide. And if there's a void in the industry because the dollars are challenged and the other providers are challenged, we get excited about our ability to fill that because we feel really confident that the partner strategy we have would really grab share here.

Thanks guys. Helpful.

Thank you. Our next question comes from John Campbell from Stephens. John, please go ahead.

Hey guys. I just want to echo the last question. I think, Rich, nice job addressing the lawsuits upfront. I've been frankly surprised to hear the level of investor concerns, but I think you did a good job of framing it up, so we agree with your take there. But going forward, I mean, investors are clearly going to still try to size up all these various scenarios. I'm hoping maybe you guys can help in that process specifically around the paid inclusion model, in those overseas markets like maybe what you're seeing on average or maybe a range of revenue per listing? And then I know with your current listing today, Rich did say it's going to be kind of fragmented potentially. But if you look at just your all-in listing today, what that looks like today? I know with the trough kind of inventory environment, it's probably a little bit lighter than it's been in the past. So maybe talk about what it is today? And maybe what it looks like. I don't know, 5, 6, 7 years ago?

Okay. Sure, John. Why don't I, why don't, we help me out Jeremy and Jeremy, if I mess up. Why don't I start with the second part, the listings question. For all its works and flaws and all the complaints we make, kind of less cooperative, at least the way it's worked in the past, maybe it doesn't work this way going forward. But at least the way it's worked in the past, it's offered up a really good level playing relatively level playing field, equal access transparent marketplace for us to access kind of for sale by agent listings in the marketplace. And so because we're connected to these MLSs, we have a full view of the for-sale inventory in the market. And ever since we have had MLS listings that hasn't changed over time. On top of all of that, let's call it commodity listings information that we have, we add to it a whole bunch of non-commodity listings information in the form of for-sale-by-owners that are oftentimes proprietary to our sites in a different market as well as quite a number, a large number of rental listings that oftentimes are unique to our market place. And so combined, that alloy creates a relatively unique listings asset that is only strengthening over time. In the event that fragments, as I said, the world gets kind of messy and difficult for regular consumers and partners alike. But Zillow, of course, like we've done in the past, will run off and secure the most inventory in the world. We will get it. Now how the business model works in that situation? Is it, we have several we have a lot of experience with paid inclusion business models, okay? And it will likely move to a paid inclusion business model. I don't know how to answer your specific rate question. You're saying, what would the rate look like in that world versus the rate that the industry is taking now other than to point you with the market cap per capita of the leading real estate portals in the U.S. versus, say, Australia or another market. And you'll see pretty quickly that the amount of value, at least in the form of market cap that's being captured by those companies is meaningfully higher than what we've been able to achieve as the leading portal here in the U.S. We see that as obviously as potential upside. But once again, we want to monetize in this industry in a way that is win-win. We want to win for consumers we want to win for our partners, and we want to win for ourselves. We think the most durable business model is where all three of those parties win. Did I leave anything out?

Yes. I mean it's Jeremy Hofmann. I'll just layer on, Rich. The hard part is building the unique content that we've built over time. So that's a combination of for-sale listings, new construction listings, rental listings, for-sale-by-owner listings. That's the really hard part. That's what we've been after for 15, 16, 17 years. Changing business models and doing a paid inclusion business model is not the challenging piece of the puzzle. It's getting all the unique content, getting all the eyeballs, and that's where we've really, really excelled. So in a world in which we go the way of international markets, we feel really well positioned as a result.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Lloyd Walmsley from UBS. Lloyd, please go ahead.

Thank you for taking my question. First, regarding the potential shifts in the industry structure and the classifieds model, could you elaborate on how you see the MLS structure evolving? Do you think a moderate scenario would allow the MLS structure to remain unchanged? What specific events do you think could disrupt that structure? Also, listing showcase seems like a promising model whether or not the overall structure changes. Can you provide an update on its adoption and the feedback from agents? How significant could this be in both a moderate and a more drastic scenario? Thank you.

Okay. Thanks, Lloyd. Maybe I'll begin, Jeremy Wacksman, and then hand it over to you. Lloyd, I guess what I'd say is we just don't think it's likely that like taking a giant hammer to the hundreds of MLSs around the country and how that legislatively regulatorily or legally would happen would be a pretty difficult thing. And so I guess there's a ton of value provided by having an integrated marketplace where most consumers and partners can see everything on the market. And while many industry participants may have forgotten that benefit, we believe that if, as things begin to fragment, they will remember that benefit. So anyway, we see this as unlikely. So I honestly don't want to give it a ton more airtime other than to say, if it happens, we're really well positioned. On the showcase thing, that is a big giant new TAM that we're going after, and I'll hand it over to Wacksman to chat about how that's going and the potential we see.

Yes. I mean, we continue to receive really great feedback about Listing Showcase from both consumers using the product and agents who have been part of our V1 and kind of early MVP rollout. As Rich mentioned, we're now live in 17 markets, and we're hard at work building out the feature set to enable us to scale. And that includes things like being able to offer it more flexibly different geographies have different density, different teams and agents have bigger and smaller businesses, and how do we enable a go-to-market that can serve all of them. I think as we talked about earlier this year, a big key to scale is ensuring that agents can bring their own photographers if they want. We provide a fantastic media service that captures all this great rich media. Rich talked about this interactive floor plan that is just such a unique and differentiated listening experience. It takes really well curated and trained media to do that, but enabling those photographers to do that when agents have a great photography workflow. And the acquisition we did earlier this year is really to help scale that. So building out those capabilities is really the key to scale. You're right that there are some commonalities between agents focusing on how to market their listing for their seller and the international comp conversation. But we really think about Listing Showcase as much about helping listing agents grow their business. What listing agents tell us and what early users of showcase have told us is, this helps them win more listings. And that's how the product is discussed and used is when I'm sitting at the kitchen table, this is something I offer that other agents can't offer. This is why you should list with me. And so that economic value, in addition to helping the seller showcase their home, the best helps the agent showcase themselves, and so we get excited about really helping grow the listing side of our business through tools like that. We'll continue to update you as we make progress, but stay tuned for kind of expansion into more markets into next year.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ryan McKeveny from Zelman & Associates. Ryan, please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question and all the details. Within the commentary you gave in the letter on touring, you mentioned real-time touring is expected to be live and about 10% of or covering about 10% of total connections in the year. I'm curious, are you able to give a similar stat on the share of connections that are happening at the 9 enhanced markets? I assume similarly a small piece of the pie that are enhanced at this point. But any specifics you can share on that?

Ryan, just to make sure you, the question you're asking is how much of our enhanced markets is in, the connections are in real-time touring?

More so just kind of how much coverage do the enhanced markets today of the total pie? You're talking about accelerating the growth opening more enhanced markets in 4Q and into '24. And I'm just trying to think about almost like how low is the base today in terms of the enhanced market to think about the opportunity going forward to expand that.

Yes. Thanks for the clarification. I mean the enhanced markets, the 9 that we're just now in, right? And so prior to this quarter, the 6 that we rolled out, it's a small percentage of overall connections, I want to say, in the teens maybe. And then what Jeremy Hofmann was alluding to is, obviously, a real-time touring experience is not going to be available on 100% of customers. Not every customer requests a tour, and then not every customer agent relationship fits the eligibility criteria. So that's a bit why we gave the color that as we ramp into the, I think, 90-odd markets into ‘24 we expect that will cover about 10% of our customers. And again, it's not simple math. Different markets have different eligibility, different density, different ability to serve. We've talked a lot about the reason we're going market by market is because you're rolling out a new workflow for agents and teams and you're training them on a new experience, deliver for the customer ends up being great, and we get great feedback from those agents because they're now meeting the customer where they want to be met, that appointment set is really when they want to get versus a request, as Rich talked about. And so the customer is happier, and the work rate, the number of times the agent can work with the customer goes up. And so those are all great indicators of transaction share gains and happier customer agent relationships. But it's not just this linear path of lighting up on more pages on the website; it is kind of market by market.

Got it. Okay. That's very helpful. And then one question on mortgage. Part of it is just reiterating that, I think you said for 4Q that you'd see or expect to see revenue growth. But is that implying that your origination growth, roughly 90% this quarter? The revenue piece down slightly year-over-year, and you called out the mortgage marketplace declines as a kind of the offset there. I guess are we reaching the point where origination growth should similarly translate to revenue growth? Like you said expected to begin in 4Q and then presumably going forward, if origination growth is, or if origination volume is growing, generally, revenue should grow going forward?

Yes, Ryan, it's Jeremy Hofmann. I'll take that one. I think it's fair to think about the originations business becoming more and more of the mortgages line item. So it is taking up more revenue at this point and the marketplace is decreasing. With respect to ‘24 and beyond, yes, our expectation is the mortgage, the VHL originations revenue will be the bigger piece of the pie, but unquestionably, marketplace is still part of the mix. So it's not perfectly direct.

Thank you. Our next question comes from John Colantuoni from Jefferies. John, please go ahead.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking my question. This is Vincent Kardos on for John. Sticking on the mortgage topic here. So last quarter, I know you flagged a 50% improvement in loan ops or productivity versus 4Q of last year? And then this quarter, you grew your originations by almost 90%, 35% sequentially, but also hiring a bunch of more loan officers. Maybe you can help us think a little bit about how much of the growth there came from adding officers versus any productivity as you saw in the quarter? And then maybe talk about how much runway you see for opposite productivity given the current housing backdrop and then maybe how that could change once we get a better rate relief going forward? Thanks.

Yes. Thanks for the question. It's Jeremy Hofmann. I think we are really pleased with the way that we are growing the purchase mortgage origination business, no question about it, up 88% in a market like this. This challenge is quite impressive. I would say the ramp in loan officers, we still see opportunities for us to get more productive. We're pleased with the productivity today, and we're obviously hiring loan officers as a result, but we think there's more to do as time goes on and we get to scale.

Yes. And maybe just to add to that a bit. I think you should expect to see both, but you should expect to see us grow loan officer count as we scale origination volume into next year, but you should also expect us to see increases in productivity and efficiency both on the customer experience. We've talked a lot in prior quarters about the huge opportunity we have with all of the customers that are coming to Zillow asking for financing questions and how can we help meet them where they are. There's those that are ready to get a loan right now. There's those that are not. How do we help get them all an answer? As well as the customers coming from our great Premier Agents who know best when to ask them to get financing questions answered to go right and offer on a home. So lots of potential productivity gains there. And then there's also lots of great factory improvements that we're hard at work building, and that's a lot of the investments we've been making to just help our loan officers, our processors and our team get more efficient at being ready to handle the scale of volume that we want to bring. So short answer is you should expect to see both from us and both should contribute to growth into next year.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ron Josey from Citigroup. Ron, please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking the question. I wanted to ask on Rentals. We saw Listings grow 45% year-over-year, revenue reaccelerated multifamily traffic is growing. Just talk to us about the change that's happening here in Rentals and the strategy here longer term? And then a quick follow-up for the team just on listing showcase. Are these buyers new to Zillow or existing, meaning I know we're monetizing, call it a newer side of the transaction on the seller side, but are they newer existing? And then any early feedback would be helpful. Thank you, guys.

Yes. Thanks, Ron. It's Jeremy Hofmann. I'll start on the Rentals. Yes, we're really pleased, and I'll let Jeremy Wacksman hit more of it, but up 34% year-over-year this quarter, up 42% in multifamily. And yes, it's executing on all cylinders. So multifamily properties were up 28% in Q3. Total active listings across both multifamily and single-family up 45% year-over-year. And then obviously, the traffic continues to be really strong. We're industry-leading there and grew double digits there. So we're really, really happy with how we're executing. And like I said in my prepared remarks, we expect 30%-plus growth in Q4 there, too. So Jeremy, anything else you want to add there?

No, I think that's right. I think it's you hit it earlier to the largest and most engaged audience using great products and services across both multi- and single-family listings. Some macro helps in terms of occupancy rates decreasing and more supply in the market means the advertisers need our high-quality customers. And so you're seeing the team execute to drive a lot of revenue growth there across the marketplace as a whole. And we get really excited about that growth continuing. And again, the Rentals business, great business, fast-growing business, a bigger part of our business, as Rich talked about, but also incredibly strategic as half of those renters are thinking about buying, and half of those renters are some of the most affordability challenged first-time homebuyers that will be ready for VHL and our great PA someday as the macro normalizes there. So incredibly great business, growing really fast, teams executing really well and super strategic for us long term. And then on Showcase, how many advertisers or agents, I think, was your question, how many agents are incremental? I mean it's a mix and intentionally so. And I think as we scale it beyond the initial markets, we expect to see that, be interesting to learn how that mix pans out. You can imagine, similar to our overall strategy when Listing Showcase helps great agents and teams grow their business, and it's a business grow driver for them. You find them that look like are great Premier Agents today that want to use it, but you also find new customers who were less interested in the products that Premier Agent has to offer, really interested in using Listing Showcase as a way to grow their business. So we're pleased with the early mix. It wasn't, there's not any sort of intentional target there. For us, it's really more about learning with partners this early MVP and V1 as we're building V2 and getting ready for scale.

Thank you. Our final question comes from Tom Champion from Piper Sandler. Tom, please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Richard, Jeremy, I'm curious if you could talk about any changes or updated thoughts on the competition? How do you think about UV growth @homes.com? And then maybe for Jeremy Hoffman, really appreciate the comments on the cost structure, very helpful. Just curious if you could talk a little bit about your thoughts around headcount growth into next year? Thank you.

We're not really experiencing any impact from the external noise, aside from achieving excellent results and making significant strides toward our growth goals, as discussed during this call. We believe that in order to avoid an overemphasis on competition, we need to concentrate on developing exceptional software that addresses real customer pain points, such as interactive floor plans, 3D virtual walkthroughs, real-time booking, and rental applications. We're also integrating Follow Up Boss, which is a well-regarded CRM among many agents. We believe our long-term success hinges on our ability to create a seamlessly integrated Super App for both our customers and partners. We embrace the challenge and understand that it requires advanced software skills, which has worked in our favor. This focus has proven successful for us thus far; we not only have the largest and most engaged audience, but 80% of that audience comes to us directly, and we expect this trend to continue. I'll pass the last question to Jeremy Hoffman and then we'll wrap up.

Yes. And just on the cost structure, I think just to reiterate what I said before, no specific guidance around 2024, but we do feel like we are at around the right level of fixed cost for the opportunities we see ahead. And then variable costs will grow as we grow revenue, and we'll look for operational efficiencies along the way, but feel really good about what we're investing against and then also the long-term margin profile of the things that we're investing against. And then beyond that, just reiterating that marketing is a different line item for us and one that will assess based on growth opportunities. But overarchingly feeling quite good about the cost structure.

Thank you, both.

We really appreciate the thoughtful questions from, and we look forward to updating you as we plan on continuing to make progress along our growth pillars. Thank you very much for your continued trust and investment in Zillow. Talk to you soon.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.