Hello, and welcome everyone to the First Quarter Fiscal 2021 Earnings Call for Commercial Metals Company. Today's call is being recorded. After the Company's remarks, we will have a question-and-answer session and we’ll have a few instructions at that time. I would like to remind all participants that during the course of this conference call, the Company will make statements that provide information other than historical information and will include expectations regarding economic conditions, the impact of COVID-19, effects of legislation, U.S. steel import levels, U.S. construction activity, demand for finished steel products, the Company's future operations, the Company's future results of operations and capital spending. These and other similar statements are considered forward-looking and may include, involve forecast and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from these expectations. These statements reflect the Company's beliefs based on current conditions but are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those that are described in the Risk Factors section of the Company's latest annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Although, these statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs, CMC offers no assurance that these expectations or beliefs will prove to have been correct and actual results may vary materially. All statements are made only as of this date. Except as required by law, CMC does not assume any obligation to update, amend or clarify these statements in connection with future events, changes in assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, new information or circumstances, or otherwise. Some numbers presented are historical non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations for such numbers can be found in the Company's earnings release or on the Company's Web site. Some numbers presented are forward looking and non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations are not provided due to the unavailability of forward looking reconciling information. Unless stated otherwise, all references made to year or quarter-end is references to the Company's fiscal year or fiscal quarter. And now, for opening remarks and introductions, I will turn the call over to the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Commercial Metals Company, Ms. Barbara Smith.

Good morning, and welcome to our first quarter earnings conference call. I'd like to wish everyone on the line a Happy New Year and extend my thanks to CMC's 11,500 employees for another great quarter. I'll begin the call with brief comments on our first quarter results before providing some color regarding the current market environment and how CMC is positioned to succeed. I'll also give an update on CMC's strategic growth initiatives. Paul Lawrence will then cover the quarter's financial information in more detail, and I will conclude our prepared remarks with a discussion of our outlook for the second quarter of fiscal 2021, after which we will open the call to question. As announced in our earnings release this morning, we reported fiscal first quarter 2021 earnings from continuing operations of $63.9 million or $0.53 per diluted share on net sales of $1.4 billion. Excluding the impact of certain charges which Paul will cover in more detail, our adjusted earnings from continuing operations were $69.8 million or $0.58 per diluted share. CMC generated core EBITDA of $156.6 million, marking the seventh consecutive quarter near or above the $150 million level. This record underscores not only our company's enhanced earnings capability compared to past periods, but also the stability provided by our integrated value chain. Activity levels in CMC's core end markets remained strong during the first quarter, leading to an increase in the company's finished steel shipments compared to a year ago. In North America, demand for rebar from our mills was driven by resilient construction activity as contractors continued to work off the healthy backlogs they carried into the pandemic. Demand for merchant products benefited from the ongoing recovery of domestic industrial production as well as a lean supply chain following heavy service center destocking in April and May. Demand for CMC's long products in Europe also remained strong during the first quarter. Residential Construction in Poland continued to be strong and grew by 7% compared to a year ago, fueling rebar consumption. Meanwhile, demand for merchant and wire rod products was supported by recovering automotive and industrial production in Poland and Germany. Manufacturing PMI indices for both countries have consistently indicated growth since July. I would like to now spend a few moments discussing the current and near-term market environment. On our earnings call in October, we highlighted elevated levels of uncertainty. Market uncertainty continues to persist. The prospect of future COVID-related lockdowns and their potential impact on the economy has led to hesitation among project owners to award new work. However, in recent weeks, we've seen more willingness to move projects forward. We've also seen a rapid increase in global prices for steel and steelmaking raw materials. Domestic scrap has been particularly impacted, increasing significantly since the end of our fiscal fourth quarter. The current elevation in scrap pricing appears to be driven primarily by increased global demand, particularly China and by near-term shortages as underutilized steel plants increased production levels. While the extension and duration of this rally is difficult to predict, it will certainly pressure margins in the near term on both our steel and downstream products. As we outlined during our Investor Day, CMC is built to weather turbulence and is structured to endure periods of volatility. Our vertical value chain and integration provides CMC with sources of strength at any point in the economic and steel price cycle. Our approach to operational excellence and optimization ensures that CMC is lean and efficient, and our team is always looking for further improvements. Let me give you a few examples of how CMC has responded to the current environment. In order to maintain metal spreads, we have responded to rapidly rising scrap costs with several rounds of announced price increases on each of our mill products. In addition, synergies we achieved following our fiscal 2019 Rebar Asset acquisition as well as our ongoing network optimization efforts have reduced CMC's cost structure meaningfully. During the first quarter, our controllable costs per ton of finished steel were 10% below the levels immediately following the transaction. This represents the cost incurred throughout CMC's vertical value chain from the scales at our recycling yards all the way to the shipment of downstream products from our fabrication facilities. These cost reductions are significant and fall directly to our bottom line. In Europe, our team reduced per ton controllable costs by roughly 10% compared to the prior year, which is a remarkable feat given our belief that this was already one of the lowest cost mills in the world. Even at the recent depressed metal margin level of $200 per ton, our European operation is generating segment-adjusted EBITDA at an annualized rate of $55 million to $60 million. The fact that CMC Europe is succeeding in the current challenging environment is this confidence that it will thrive in better times. The first quarter margin over scrap was nearly an eight-year low and was $25 per ton below the long-term average. Return to mid-cycle levels would add $30 million to $35 million of annualized segment-adjusted EBITDA. Factors driving uncertainty in our markets have led to some erosion in the volume of work within CMC's downstream backlog. As previously mentioned, customers have delayed awarding projects. However, in recent weeks, bookings have picked up and the backlog is starting to stabilize. Looking beyond the near-term uncertainty, longer-term indicators remain encouraging. The amount of potential work that downstream customers are asking us to quote remains strong, indicating a robust project pipeline. Our commercial teams continue to report that project owners, though currently hesitant to book work, are optimistic about future conditions. External indicators also point to reasons for confidence. Residential Construction, which generally leads non-residential and local infrastructure by 12 to 24 months, is very strong. The regional population shift into CMC's core geographical markets has accelerated during the last year, boding well for medium to long-term activity. Additionally, the Portland Cement Association recently revised their 2021 and 2022 estimates for cement consumption growth upwards; roughly 1% and 2% respectively. ECA is a forecast provider we have highlighted in the past as having the highest correlation to domestic rebar shipments. I'll now like to provide a quick update on recent strategic announcements. In conjunction with our announcement last August of construction of our third technologically advanced micro mill, we announced that we would eventually curtail all operations at our Rancho Cucamonga site. At the end of December, we ceased production at the mill while maintaining full service to our customers. Operational changes and logistics were carefully planned. We have experienced a seamless transition thus far. I would like to acknowledge and thank all of CMC's employees at the Rancho site for their service and professionalism through this difficult decision to cease operations. During the quarter, we made significant progress on the construction of our third rolling mill in Poland. The equipment and support utilities are now being installed. We expect to begin testing equipment in a few months and continue to target commercial production later this fiscal year. As indicated during our last earnings call, total project costs should be under our original budget of $80 million. Once operational, the third rolling line will allow our facility to utilize 200,000 tons of current excess mill capacity by converting it to higher value add finished products. This will further increase our production flexibility and leverage fixed melt shop costs. Construction of our new MBQ capable micro mill and our third rolling line in Poland, in conjunction with our ongoing network optimization efforts, and other smaller organic projects is expected to add approximately $135 million through the cycle EBITDA over the next few years. Before turning the call over to Paul, I will briefly mention efforts CMC is undertaking regarding sustainability. Sustainability is core to CMC and has been since our founding as a recycling company 105 years ago. Good business and good environmental stewardship are fully aligned at our company. This has been demonstrated in our adoption of the cleanest steelmaking technologies and our recent announcements of increased sourcing of renewable energy. In addition, to better communicate CMC's strong ESG performance, we are planning to offer new disclosures over the course of calendar 2021. Finally, as stated in our press release, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of CMC common stock for stockholders of record on January 21, 2021. The dividend will be paid on February 4, 2021. This represents CMC's 225th consecutive quarterly dividend. That is an overview. I will now turn the discussion over to Paul Lawrence, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to provide more comments on the results for the quarter.

Thank you, Barbara. And good morning to everyone joining us on the call today. Today, we reported earnings from continuing operations of $63.9 million or $0.53 per diluted share, compared to earnings from continuing operations of $82.8 million or $0.69 per diluted share in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The ultimate quarter includes net after-tax charges of $5.9 million related primarily to facility closure and asset impairment expenses at our Rancho Cucamonga steel California operations. As Barbara mentioned, production ended in late December, excluding these and other one-time expenses, adjusted earnings from continuing operations were $69.8 million or $0.58 per diluted share. Our core EBITDA from continuing operations was $156.6 million for the first quarter of 2021, a decrease of 10% from the near record level of $174.4 million reported in the first quarter of 2020. Slide 5 of the supplemental earnings call slides available on our website shows the stability of our core EBITDA on a per ton of finished steel shipped basis over the course of the pandemic. Now, I will review the results of segments for the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The North America segment recorded adjusted EBITDA of $155.6 million for the quarter, compared to adjusted EBITDA of $174.7 million in the same period last year. The largest driver of this reduction was lower margins over scrap costs on finished products. Margins for both steel products and downstream products were impacted by lower average selling prices compared to a year ago against higher scrap input costs. Selling prices for steel products from our mills decreased by $14 per ton on a year-over-year basis, but did sequentially increase due to price increase announcements that became effective in the latter half of the quarter. These price increases which Barbara mentioned earlier occurred largely in late November and have continued into January. The impact of these increases will be realized by the end of the second quarter. The average selling price of downstream products declined by $42 per ton from a year ago as a result of the mix of work shipped as well as the impact of the high price projects booked in the immediate aftermath of Section 232 rolling off our backlog. Margins in our backlog remain strong and profitable relative to historical levels. As Barbara noted, exceptional operational performance helped offset the impact of lower margins. Prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2020, controllable costs per ton of finished steel shipped declined by roughly 5% due to improvements throughout our vertical footprint. The most significant benefit was lower mill conversion costs, which is our largest cost outside of scrap. We continue to benefit from our decision taken in early fiscal 2020 to curtail melting operations in California and supply the facility with lower-cost billets from other plants. Additionally, metal costs benefited from declining prices for consumables such as electrodes and alloys. Shipments of finished products in the first quarter were essentially equal to the pre-pandemic volume of a year ago, with growth in steel products offset by a decline in downstream products. Rebar volumes out of the mills have been supported by sustained construction activity throughout the pandemic. Non-rebar volume, which is principally merchant bar and wire rod, saw an increase in volumes against the backdrop of flat industry consumption. Downstream product shipments were impacted by lower activity in certain geographies, as well as multiple storms in the Gulf Coast region. Recent trends in North American margins, volumes and cost performance can be seen on slide 6 of the accompanying deck. Our European segment recorded adjusted EBITDA of $14.5 for the first quarter of 2021 compared to EBITDA of $11.4 million in the prior year quarter. The largest contributors to the improved year-over-year performance were strong cost management, higher shipment volumes and a $1.3 million COVID-related benefit from the Polish government. Margins over scrap were down on a year-over-year basis but virtually flat from the prior quarter. Import flows continue to disrupt pricing and spreads in Central Europe across all long product categories. Our Europe segment has experienced four consecutive quarters of margins over scrap between $195 and $200 per ton, which is well below the long-term average, as Barbara pointed out. Based on pricing developments over the last several weeks, we believe margins have bottomed. Europe volumes increased meaningfully compared to the prior year, rising 17% due primarily to the impact of improving industrial demand in Central Europe, as well as service center restocking on merchant and wire rod. Rebar shipments were stable year-over-year demonstrating the resilience of construction-related demand in the domestic Polish market. Now turning to our balance sheet and liquidity; as of November 30, 2020 cash and cash equivalents totaled $465.2 million. In addition, we had availability under our credit and accounts receivable programs of approximately $679 million. During the quarter, we used $12 million of cash to fund operating activities. This usage resulted primarily from the timing of payments related to certain accrued expenses, including the $32 million of acquisition working capital settlement highlighted in the fourth quarter earnings release. Looking ahead to the second quarter of fiscal 2021, we believe the funding of working capital will be a meaningful use of cash. Both our inventory and accounts receivable balances will be impacted by the generally higher price levels for scrap and finished steel. Our leverage metrics remain attractive and have improved significantly over the last two fiscal years. Our trailing 12-month net debt to EBITDA ratio now sits at 1.1, while our net debt to capitalization is just 21%. Our robust balance sheet and overall financial strength provides us the flexibility to fund strategic projects, navigate the uncertainties of the current economic environment and still pursue opportunistic M&A. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 25.3%, in line with our full-year effective tax rate forecast between 25% to 26%. Lastly, I would like to provide our current outlook for capital expenditures for fiscal 2021. We expect to invest between $200 million to $225 million, with roughly $85 million earmarked for our new micro mill. For comparison, we have previously stated that our typical capital spend averages around $150 million annually. This concludes my remarks. I'll turn it back to Barbara for the outlook.

Thank you, Paul. We expect finished steel shipments in the second quarter to follow typical seasonal trends in both North America and Europe. As a reminder, volumes tend to decline mid to high single digits from Q1 to Q2 as construction activity is slowed this time of year with the holidays and winter weather. Shipments of steel and downstream products in North America should be supported by our construction backlog. The manufacturing sectors of both the US and Central Europe appear to signal continued recovery, which we expect to benefit volumes of merchant bar in both markets, as well as our wire rod product in Europe. We anticipate margin pressure in North America during the quarter as a result of rapidly rising scrap costs and the timing lag on announced price increases. CMC is well positioned to navigate market volatility and uncertainty. This gives us confidence that over the long term, our company is structured to earn an average EBITDA of at least $540 million per year through the cycle as we shared with you during our Investor Day, adding the growth projects that are currently underway; we believe we can grow our through-the-cycle EBITDA to $675 million over the next three to four years. Once again, I would like to thank all of the CMC employees for delivering another outstanding quarter of performance. We will now open the call to questions.

The first question today comes from Chris Terry of Deutsche Bank.

Hi, Barbara and Paul. Hope you both are well. I wanted to ask you a question just around the infrastructure bill. I think previously you talked about the rebar market potentially benefiting at 1 million to 1.4 million tons a year in that line. Just wanted your thoughts on if we are to get an improvement in the infrastructure bill, how long in your experience something like that might take to flow through the numbers and just checking that 1 million to 1.4 million is the right range. Thank you.

Thank you, Chris, and Happy New Year. We're still confident in that range of 1 to 1.4. I think we'll have to see what the priorities are of the new administration. But certainly, infrastructure does seem to be one of the areas of focus early on in the administration's term. So, we would be highly encouraged if that moves forward.

Okay, now just in terms of the timing of how that might come through, I assume based on your experience with backlogs that this could be in 2022 or how long would something like that take to flow through the economy?

Yes, I apologize. I didn't hear the second half of your question; normally there's a 12 to 18-month lag, I would say. Given discussions with our customers, there's certainly enthusiasm to start projects, and so we're just really watching a number of things and hoping for the continued recovery in the economy and no setbacks with COVID. But I think if the infrastructure bill is approved in this first year, we would start to see things in the following fiscal year.

Okay, thanks. And just a follow up on the mechanics of the different parts of your business. Just checking that the fabrication business is still sort of that 9 to 12 months lag on pricing, and how you think about that business. And then scrap still flows through on a 30 to 45-day lag into the mills division, just wanted to think about some of the modeling.

Yes, I think that the 9 to 12 months is a good average. More recently, we've seen more short duration and spot business in some of our fabrication business, which is good because it turns a little bit faster. You don't have as much raw material exposure, but those are good averages for both fab turnover and scrap turnover.

Next question comes from Curt Woodworth of Credit Suisse.

Yes, hey, good morning, Barbara and Paul. I know there's been a flurry of price hikes in the last three months and scrap pricing continues to go up pretty dramatically. Just wondering you talked about how you expect to have all the price hikes fully in place by the end of Q2, and obviously scrap cycles into the business through COGS, quickly. So can you give us a sense on what type of metal spread compression you could be facing this quarter? And then when I look at spot rebar and metal bolting, it's about 755. So, it's up roughly 160 over the past three months, which is somewhat equivalent to what the scrap market has done, if we include about an $80 per ton rise this month. So would you say that as it stands today, the price hikes you've announced by the end of Q2, assuming scrap stays where it is right now, you would be roughly back to where you were on metal spread?

Curt, we don't give any specific commentary on pricing for obvious reasons, but certainly there's good transparency on the changes in raw material price, and there's been good transparency on announced price movements, and assuming that those are accepted in the marketplace, we're encouraged by that and are obviously aimed to optimize margins as best we can.

Okay, maybe some another way in terms of the lag on the announced price hikes. So what would a typical lag be between your contract structure, and then the timing in terms of working through the inventory? Like if you announce a price hike today, would that kind of start to flow through on about a 60-day lag or how should we think about kind of the timing mismatch, if you will, between scrap in more fluid and pricing taking a little bit longer to effectuate?

Yes, generally speaking, and every announcement is different based on conditions in the marketplace, but generally speaking if there's an announcement today and customers are protected for two to four weeks as a scrap flows through like it does, and those are guidelines. There are a lot of factors, and every action by every market participant is slightly different.

Sure. Can you provide an update on the recent increase in backlog, particularly in relation to the election and other factors? Which sectors are experiencing this activity? Is it primarily in infrastructure compared to non-residential? You mentioned that residential is performing better, but I believe your exposure to residential is limited, so could you clarify what that exposure looks like? Thank you.

Well, backlog as everyone can appreciate, when the pandemic literally shut the economies down around the world, that took everything to a screeching halt. And so, there was a pause in loading and bidding as everyone's search to understand things would go from there. And as time has gone on, as we all know, our business as an essential business has been able to do upgrades effectively throughout this, and I think construction activity in general has been able to move forward without any major disruptions. So, it then comes back to a lot of other uncertainty factors and people tend to be more hesitant to work when they don't have policy matters going forward. Long story short, after some decline in backlog, we do believe that the backlog is stabilizing. We are encouraged by recent quoting and booking activity. We know from our customers, there is good activity or good projects out there. And we've seen some really interesting ones over the last eight weeks that are finally coming to market after some months of hesitation or just pause to understand the economic fallout from COVID. Our backlog sits around 60%, private and public. There was an infrastructure bill of the magnitude that the House and Senate have talked about, that could start to shift over time and be more heavily weighted towards infrastructure, but I should remind folks, there have been a lot of population movements throughout this past year, and that’s where we do see some market strength as a result of those trends. And that's probably going to continue. With that comes a lot of infrastructure that will follow on from the strength in residential. I should remind our listeners that we do now, with the addition of the recent acquisition, we do have wire rod exposure, not only in Europe, but also here in the US, and there is a good amount of wire rod that goes into residential. So, we have a little more exposure there than maybe what you would think of historically; again, with a strong residential following on to non-residential, and so that's a very encouraging sign for us going forward.

My next question comes from Seth Rosenfeld of Exane BNP Paribas.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking our questions today. If I may, I have first a follow up question about your recent comments on MBQ. And then I wanted to come back to working capital, please. When it comes to MBQ, can you give us a sense on what's driving these particularly strong volumes in both the US and in Europe? To what extent do you attribute this to market share gains versus some weaker competitors? And inventory restocking after the summer trough by your trader customers? And more something more fundamental in real demand trends, if we can start there, please.

Okay, thank you, Seth. Happy New Year. The MBQ has been, as we've highlighted, an important product. It's always been in our portfolio. We very much appreciate our merchant customers. And it's not a simple answer; we have invested in providing a broader product range. And so that opens up opportunities for us. Clearly, there's been inventory restocking, as a lot of the manufacturing sector was shut down for a period of time in the early stages of a pandemic. And then I think service centers have been very judicious and very conservative in managing their working capital, understandably so. Given the market, volatility, and uncertainty, it's a combination of things. I can also remind you that, in the US, there was one mill that was shut down over the past period of time and so certainly that opened up other opportunities for us as well.

Just to clarify, is there anything with these volume numbers that you think is uniquely or unsustainably boosted by restocking? Is this a one-time right we should take moving forward for MBQ definitely the bottom line?

And I don't think so. I think that I don't believe the manufacturing sector is fully ramped up to normal operations. I know there are still shortages throughout the supply chain. If you're in the market buying anything, you certainly will be aware of some of the shortages throughout the supply chain. But so yes, maybe there's some short-term settling out of it. But I still think there's and our data would indicate that there's going to be continued demand growth in 2021 as all of the sectors of the economy recover.

Okay, that's very clear. And if I can ask a follow-up question, please on the guidance for working capital, please, obviously, a big use of cash in Q1, and the guidance for significant investment in Q2, can you provide any framework for the scale of investment we would expect? And then is there any reason to expect a full-year investment this year, or assuming some moderation of trends would we expect to release in the back half, please?

First off, good morning. As far as our working capital in the first quarter, as you indicated, you saw a normal use of cash for us. Typically, the first quarter includes various year-end related payouts that occur in the first quarter, as well as some accrued interest and other activities. And so the normal flow is for us is an outflow in the first quarter, and then holding everything else constant, we recover that working capital throughout the balance of the year. In the current year, obviously, in addition to the normal cycles, we have the impact of the inflationary pressures, both on the inventory side and the receivable side. And really, that's clearly in a cyclical business, that's a temporary investment and really depends on your outlook for the cycle of costs and where you project the scrap prices to go and possibly recover. But the positive thing from our perspective we've got $1.1 billion of liquidity through the judicious cash balance sheet management that we've got. And so, we view this as part of the normal management of the business and we do see overall that we continue to look to optimize the business which includes long-term having working capital reductions in a day’s measure. But in today's environment as a result of the rising prices, clearly we will see an investment in cash here in the second quarter.

Our next question comes from Timna Tanners of Bank of America.

Yes. Hey, good morning, Barbara and Paul, Happy New Year. I just want to clarify, so on the comments about the scrap margin or descriptive pressure on margins from scrap. If we believe this could be the year of scrap and scrap is off to a sharply higher start for the year and into your February quarter. Is your guidance more commentary on like the temporary timing of passing it all through? Or is there any reason to believe that this is the margin squeeze that we could see beyond like the short term? So I'm just really asking about sharply higher scrap prices maybe it's just a question of timing and how you think about that adjustment for your steel business and then I want to ask something about steel fabrication on those lines as well.

Timna, we really think this is a timing lag. We're very encouraged by the ability, which has historically been the case. There are customers who understand that as raw material prices change, that there are adjustments to finished product pricing. So right now, it's really a question of the timing between those movements and price changes. Imports are relatively at bay, and that's another factor as that plays into it and so that bodes well for us that we're going to be able to recover those raw material price changes as they occur.

Okay, that makes sense. So just because of the unusually sharp increase and probably conservatism into February unknowns there it makes sense to be a bit conservative. But along those lines, I'm trying to understand how to think about the fabricating business. So if I understand correctly, the inputs, the rebar that goes into that is priced on like a quarter lag. And then the finished product is priced on like a 9 to 12 months lag. So if we think about the rebar price inflation for now, against what we know from a year ago, does that imply like a near-term margin squeeze until any adjustments can be made on the selling price? Or can you just guide us how to think about that? I believe you talked about it and Paul talked about it and cautioned on it, but I just want to make sure I understood that guidance.

Yes. So, I’d make the following remarks. And Paul can certainly add color if he'd like. Just as a reminder, first and foremost, generally, higher prices are beneficial to the business overall, save the lags that we spoke of. So we are encouraged by the higher finished goods prices that we're seeing in the marketplace. I also want to remind everyone that on the raw material side, when raw material prices move higher, that creates a nice opportunity in our recycling side of the business to improve margins, which helps to offset and buffer the temporary impact on the other side of the coin, which is the fab side that you alluded to, Timna. Yes, there is going to be some temporary adjustments in fab as fab contracts adjust to the higher raw material prices. But I'm encouraged that not only is the fab backlog stabilized and started to build again, but also I think that we're going to see fab prices begin to adjust to these changes in raw material prices. We try to be very judicious in looking at projects when you have this phenomenon going on. But we've been at this for a long time. And there are those offsetting factors between recycling benefits and temporary fab impacts.

The only thing I would add, Timna, is if you look at where the margin is on our downstream products over scrap here in this most recent quarter, it is still at and compared to historical levels elevated margins. And so while we will see temporary squeezes, as Barbara has outlined, we're starting from a place of elevated margins, which will mitigate the impact somewhat in comparison to some prior cycles.

The next question comes from Andreas Bokkenheuser of UBS.

Thank you very much. Happy New Year, everyone. Just a quick question on kind of the order book this year. So I fully understand the backlog. And you were mentioning how residents are kind of sensitive to risk and so on and so forth. When we look at some of the leading indicators like non-residential starts and the ABI and so on, it would suggest that we could actually see pressure on contraction steel demand this year. But from what I'm taking away from the call is that you're pretty comfortable with your new order book. So how should we kind of think about it overall? Are you effectively capturing market share? Is that kind of where the bulk of your volume growth is coming from this year in a potentially shrinking market, or do you think that looking at the ABI, looking at non-residential construction starts, they're just not good indicators of how the market is going to play out this year? How should we think about that?

Yes, I think we're managing a portfolio of products and while certainly rebar is a very, very key component of that, we do have these other products that are not tied to ABI and other things. We like to look at Portland Cement, and cement consumption, because cement consumption is more correlated to rebar consumption than just ABI or non-res, because there are a lot of other uses of rebar outside of just non-res. Certainly, non-res is important. Portland Cement also has a very, very good track record of forecast accuracy in Portland Cement; over this past year, during the pandemic has candidly continued to improve or increase their projections going into 2021. Now factoring in all of the more current economic data, Portland Cement is showing a modest increase in cement consumption year-over-year. So that gives us encouragement along with all the other factors that we are watching.

One point I would add, Andreas, is geographic spread as well. You look at where we're predominantly located in the Sunbelt areas. Those are clearly the strongest markets from a non-res perspective. The Northeast is weak and has been weak now for a number of years. Those often have some elevated impacts on the overall numbers versus our markets.

That's very clear and makes a lot of sense. I have one follow-up on scrap. We've seen the headlines about China reopening for imported scrap. How do you see this affecting costs? Do you think it will create challenges by tightening the global scrap market, leading to increased exports from US scrap yards? Or do you view this as an opportunity to manage your finished yield price at a higher level and protect your spreads if the global scrap market tightens? That's my follow-up, and I have no further questions.

Thank you, Andreas. As I said earlier, generally speaking, higher raw material prices, higher finished good prices lead to much-improved results in our business. So we're not certainly discouraged by that. I think we also have a business model that's designed to flourish. Because we know that raw materials fluctuate, fluctuate within a year, and that can fluctuate certainly year-to-year. So we have a very flexible business model, unlike other products in the steel value chain that have longer lags in order to adjust for raw material pricing, have a relatively short lag in that regard. And so we'll see. Certainly, we're studying the current phenomena. And I think, just like you have a number of mills that were down for a period of time this past year, and they are coming back online as industrial activity and economies begin to heal. I think you have a similar situation that's occurring in China and Asia and other places around the world. So we will remain very nimble and flexible to adjust to.

The next question comes from Phil Gibbs of KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Good morning. Happy New Year. This first question for me, Barbara, I think you mentioned that backlogs on the downstream side domestically are starting to stabilize. They had pulled back a little bit post-election. Where do you think we are year-on-year in terms of downstream US backlogs?

Yes. I don't think the pullback was election-related so I think it was just really the pandemic. So that's been slowly healing as time goes on. And we'll see what happens in the coming months in terms of our recent uptick in COVID cases that I think everybody's learning to live within that environment. I don't think that we'll see the pullback in industrials and other activities, like we saw back in March of last year. The backlogs are down a little bit, still single digits, but just encouraged that it stabilizing, and we do see so much more positive economic activity today than four months ago, six months ago. I would also add, I think I mentioned it earlier that in some parts of the business, our backlog is shorter duration, which is a good thing for us because it cycles through quicker and don't have to react on that raw material and our price, not as exacerbated as when you fill up with a lot of long-duration projects.

Thank you. And as we look at your conversion costs, you pointed to the quarter being very solid in terms of your execution. Any way to isolate how much that benefited you on an absolute basis, year-on-year, relative to Q1 2020? Are we talking five million, 15 million? I'm just trying to get a sense of how much you've been able to optimize the business just in the last 12 months.

If you take a look at the controllable costs, Phil, which we define as everything from what we receive from the scale to the fab locations excluding scrap, we have seen a significant reduction that is meaningful. It's certainly in the range of over 10 million in what we've achieved over time.

Thank you. And then lastly, if I could, on your margins, I think you had said on the US business on the mill side, margins were starting to stabilize to improve later in the quarter as you push through higher pricing. Obviously, you talked about several successive rounds of increases. And then you're saying margins are bottoming in Europe, and maybe you've got some fab pressures that you talked about. So at the end of the day, it seems to me like seasonally speaking, you pointed to the volumes being down, but it sounds like spreads could be reasonably stable given all the puts and takes; it just depends on what type of business we're talking about within your portfolio. Is that fair?

I think we'll see where things go. It's early in the quarter. But I think that the margins, they stabilized at the end of the quarter, but you've still got to push through raw material and the lag effect of price changes still. So I think to recover back to a stable margin by the end of the quarter is probably a realistic expectation but no doubt there's going to be pressure on the margin within the quarter. But very encouraged by markets, escalations in raw material prices. We're going to make much money if we can. And we're fairly encouraged for 2021 coming out of a period of time where it's been very, very difficult to get any insight into where the markets are going.

The next question comes from Tyler Kenyon of Cowen.

Thanks very much. Good morning and Happy New Year. Wondering if you could maybe provide us an update on your progress and where you are in capturing that $50 million of projected EBITDA enhancement just from network optimization that you laid out in your Investor Day. Just with Rancho now closed and a number of other initiatives underway, maybe if you could give us a sense as to the cadence of realizing that $50 million over the next couple of years and perhaps give us a sense as to what's been realized today.

Hi, Tyler. Regarding the activities, it will take time to fully realize all the optimization benefits. We've already acted on the most straightforward opportunity, which was closing steel California and using the lower cost facilities to supply that market while continuing to serve California. That’s the immediate benefit; for the other initiatives, we are optimistic, but they will require substantial effort. We are just at the beginning stages of unlocking those optimization opportunities. As we mentioned during Investor Day, this is a two to three-year undertaking, which is still our outlook. We are experiencing significant benefits from the closure through reduced controllable costs, and there are still good opportunities ahead that we are becoming increasingly confident in as we move forward.

So it sounds like very little, if any, has been realized about $50 million today.

I wouldn't characterize it as very little to any, but take it over the four years, and it's going to be backend weighted.

Got it. Okay, thank you. And then just with respect to the investment in Poland, sounds like that is expected to ramp by the end of this fiscal year? And how quickly do you think you can get to optimal utilization levels and to maintaining that $20 million run rate?

Thank you. Well, we have a really stellar team in Poland and always execute well on their major capital expenditures. We would expect this to be no different. I think we can better update you as time goes on because the commissioning activities are going to be late in this fiscal year. But we would expect a smooth commissioning and ramping up of that equipment. Having said that, you have to look at the market conditions in Europe, and that'll be a factor that we will monitor, and that will weather the market and absorb all of that volume, as quick as we would like and hope. But at this stage, we think in 2021, you'll see a meaningful contribution off of the new mill and you'll see a smooth commissioning and ramp-up. We can probably give you a better thing later in this fiscal year. Have a better view into 2022 outlook.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. Ms. Smith, I will now turn the call back over to you.

Thank you, Elisa. Thank you all for joining us on today's conference call and we look forward to speaking with many of you during our investor calls in the coming week. And Happy New Year and stay safe. Thank you.

This concludes today's Commercial Metals Company Conference Call. You may now disconnect your lines.