Good afternoon, and thank you for joining the First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call for LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. Joining the call today are our Chief Executive Officer, Rich Steinmeier, and President and Chief Financial Officer, Matt Audette. Rich and Matt will offer introductory remarks, and then the call will be opened for questions. The company would appreciate if analysts would limit themselves to only one question. To ask a follow-up, please reenter the queue. The company has posted its earnings press release and supplementary information on the Investor Relations section of the company’s website, investor.lpl.com. Today’s call will include forward-looking statements, including statements about LPL Financial’s future financial and operating results, outlook, business strategies, and plans as well as other opportunities and potential risks that management foresees. Such forward-looking statements reflect management’s current estimates or beliefs and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or the timing of events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. For more information about such risks and uncertainties, the company refers listeners to the disclosures set forth under the caption Forward-Looking Statements in the earnings press release as well as the risk factors and other disclosures contained in the company’s recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. During the call, the company will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of such non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP figures, please refer to the company’s earnings release, which can be found at investor.lpl.com. With that, I will now turn the call over to Mr. Steinmeier.

Thanks, Operator, and thank you to everyone for joining our call. It’s a pleasure to speak with you again. It’s been a strong start to the year for LPL. We delivered another quarter of strong business performance. We reported excellent financial results, and we reached an agreement to acquire Commonwealth, significantly accelerating our progress towards our vision to be the best firm in wealth management. We accomplished this against a challenging operating backdrop with rising macroeconomic uncertainty. It’s periods like this that serve as a reminder of the value of professional advice, the importance of our responsibility to support our advisors, and the strength and resiliency of our business model. Okay. Now let’s turn to our Q1 results. Despite market headwinds during the quarter, total assets increased to a new quarterly high of $1.8 trillion as we attracted record organic net new assets of $71 billion representing a 16% annualized growth rate. Our first quarter business results led to strong financial performance with record adjusted EPS of $5.15 Now let’s turn to our strategic plan and our growth across our organic and inorganic activity initiatives. Our vision is clear. We aspire to be the best firm in wealth management. To do that, we are focused on three key priorities. One, pursuing novel and differentiated strategies that enable the firm’s sustained success. Two, creating an extraordinary employee experience so employees in turn deliver an unparalleled client experience. And three, leading the firm with operational excellence through increased intentionality and rigor. Effectively executing on these focus areas will help us sustain our industry-leading growth while delivering improved operating leverage. With that as context, let’s review a few highlights of our business growth. In the first quarter, recruited assets were $39 billion bringing our total for the trailing 12 months to a record $167 billion. In our traditional independent market, we added approximately $20 billion in assets during Q1, a record for the first quarter of the year. This improves on our already industry-leading capture rates of advisors in motion, while also expanding the breadth and depth of our pipeline. With respect to our expanded affiliation models, strategic wealth, independent employee, and our enhanced RIA offering, we delivered another solid quarter recruiting roughly $2 billion in assets. And as we look ahead, we expect that the increasing awareness of these models in the marketplace and the ongoing enhancements to our capabilities will drive sustainable growth. Next, we added approximately $1 billion of assets in the traditional bank and credit union market. We also continued to make progress with large institutions, where during the first quarter, we onboarded the retail wealth management business of WinTrust Financial and completed the transition of Prudential Advisors onto our platform. Our momentum continued in Q2, where in April, we announced that First Horizon would onboard its wealth management business to our institution services platform. Turning to overall asset retention, it remains industry-leading at 98% for the first quarter and over the last twelve months. This is a testament to our continued efforts to enhance the advisor experience through the delivery of new capabilities and technology and the evolution of our service and operations functions. As a complement to our organic growth, we closed and onboarded the acquisition of the investment center and advanced our work to onboard and integrate Atria Wealth Solutions, for which the conversions began last weekend. Now, as for our planned acquisition of Commonwealth Financial Network, I can’t underscore enough how honored we are to be partnering with the team at Commonwealth as we jointly engage with their advisors to articulate the power of combining our two firms. I’ve personally had the good fortune of speaking with a number of Commonwealth advisors. And the more time I spend with them, the more I understand the power of this distinguished community. Many of these advisors have worked together for decades, supported by a highly responsive management team that has cultivated a unique culture and family-like atmosphere. I have the utmost conviction in the value of preserving and fostering the Commonwealth community. We remain steadfast in our commitment to delivering on this tremendous opportunity to bring together the best of two great firms. We will preserve Commonwealth’s industry-leading service experience, which has garnered the number one in independent adviser satisfaction with J.D. Power for eleven consecutive years, and we’ll build upon that with an upgraded best-of-breed platform, including more flexible technology, a more comprehensive product set, extensive research, and unique capabilities like LPL’s liquidity and succession offering. By preserving the Commonwealth experience for advisers and maintaining continuity in the broader community and culture, while also leveraging the substantial resources and capabilities of LPL, we will deliver an unparalleled offering for independent financial advisors with Commonwealth at LPL. We are still in the early innings of the retention effort, but are tracking to our plan and in line with our expectations with respect to advisor commitments. We spent the last several years building out the team, processes, and capabilities to execute large and complex onboardings, all geared towards ensuring a frictionless experience for transitioning advisors. We are now focusing those resources on this important opportunity to ensure that we deliver a seamless transition. In closing, the first quarter was a strong start to the year, and we feel great about our position as a critical partner to our advisors and institutions, while we continue to maximize long-term value for shareholders. With that, I’ll turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Rich. I’m glad to speak with everyone on today’s call. As we move into 2025, we remain focused on serving our advisors, growing our business, and delivering shareholder value. This focus led to another quarter of strong organic growth in both our traditional and expanded market. As we onboarded the wealth management businesses of Prudential and WinTrust and are preparing to onboard First Horizon later this year. As a complement to our strong organic growth, we closed and onboarded the acquisition of the Investment Center in March, continue to prepare to onboard our Atria Advisors and lastly, entered into an agreement to acquire Commonwealth Financial Network. So as we look ahead, we are more excited than ever by the opportunities we have to serve and support our growing advisory while continuing to deliver an industry-leading value proposition and drive organic growth. Now turning to our first quarter business results. Total advisory and brokerage assets were $1.8 trillion, up 3% from Q4 as record organic net new assets more than offset lower equity. Total organic net new assets were $71 billion and approximately 16% annualized growth rate. Prior to the onboarding of WinTrust Advisors and the remaining Prudential assets, our annualized organic growth rate was approximately 7%, a strong result both on an absolute and relative basis. On the recruiting front, Q1 recruited assets were $39 billion which included $16 billion from WinTrust. Prior to large institutions, recruited assets were approximately $22 billion, a record for the first quarter of the year. As for our Q1 financial results, the combination of organic growth and expense discipline led to an adjusted pretax margin of approximately 40% and record adjusted EPS of $5.15. Gross profit was $1.273 billion, up $45 million sequentially. As for the components, commission advisory fees net of payout were $363 million, up $50 million from Q4. Our payout rate was 86.8%, down 100 basis points from Q4, largely due to the seasonal reset of the production bonus at the beginning of the year. Looking ahead to Q2, we anticipate our payout rate will increase by approximately 60 basis points driven by the typical seasonal build in the production. With respect to client cash revenue, it was $408 million, up $11 million from Q4 as average cash balances increased during the quarter. Overall client cash balances ended the quarter at $53 billion, down $2 billion sequentially, primarily driven by advisory fees paid during the quarter. Within our ICA portfolio, the mix of fixed rate balances ended the quarter at roughly 60% within our target range of 50% to 75%. Looking more closely at our ICA yield, it was three thirty-seven basis points in Q1, up two basis points from Q4, driven by higher yields on our fixed rate contract renewals. As we look ahead to Q2, based on where client cash balances and interest rates are today, as well as the yields on our new fixed rate contracts, we expect our ICA yield to be roughly flat to Q1. As for service and fee revenue, it was $145 million in Q1, up $6 million from Q4, driven by strong organic growth and higher IRA fees. Looking ahead to Q2, we expect service and fee revenue to increase by approximately $5 million sequentially, driven by conference revenues and the underlying growth of the business. Moving on to Q1 transaction revenue. It was $68 million, up $6 million sequentially due to increased trading volume. As we look ahead to Q2, we expect transaction revenue to be roughly flat. Now let’s move on to our recent large institution onboardings, as well as our closed and upcoming acquisitions. As for large institutions, in Q1, we onboarded WinTrust and completed the transition of Prudential onto our platform. Collectively, these onboardings added over $80 billion of client. In terms of M&A, we recently started the onboarding of Atria Advisors, which will continue for the next few months and expect to close our acquisition of Commonwealth in the second half of this year. These acquisitions are expected to add nearly $350 billion of client assets to our platform. Now let’s turn to expenses starting with 4G. It was $413 billion in Q1. For the full year 2025, we’re seeing early returns on our renewed focus to drive operating leverage in the business, as our efficiency efforts have slowed the growth of core G&A. As a result, we are lowering the upper end of our outlook range by $15 million. We now anticipate full year 2025 core G&A to be in a range of $1.730 billion to $1.765 billion which includes $170 million to $180 million of expenses related to Prudential and Atria, but it’s prior to expenses associated with Commonwealth. To give you a sense of the near-term timing of the spend, as we look ahead to Q2, we expect core G&A to be in a range of $435 million to $445 million. Moving on to Q1 promotional expense. It was $152 million, down $21 million from Q4, primarily driven by lower Prudential related onboarding costs, as well as seasonally lower conference. Looking ahead to Q2, we expect promotional expense to increase by approximately $20 million driven by conference spend as well as increased transition assistance resulting from strong recruiting. Turning to depreciation and amortization, it was $92 million in Q1, flat sequentially. Looking ahead to Q2, we expect depreciation and amortization to increase by roughly $5 million. As for interest expense, it was $81 million in Q1, down $1 million sequentially due to lower interest expense on our floating rate. In addition, in early April, we issued $1.5 billion of senior notes to finance a portion of the acquisition of Commonwealth. As a result, in Q2, we expect interest expense to increase by approximately $20 million sequentially. Lastly, a reminder that until the closing of Commonwealth, we will earn interest on the proceeds from our recent capital. As such, we expect interest income to increase by approximately $30 million sequentially. Regarding capital management, we ended Q1 with corporate cash of $621 million, up $142 million from Q4. As for our leverage ratio, at the end of Q1, it was 1.8 times. As a reminder, we expect to close our acquisition of Commonwealth in the second half of this year. And following the close, we expect our leverage ratio to be approximately 2.25 times, a little above the midpoint of our target range of 1.5 to 2.5 times. To uphold our commitment to maintaining a strong and flexible capital position, we paused share repurchases following the announcement of our planned acquisition of Commonwealth. Following the close, we have a plan to reduce leverage closer to the midpoint of the range by the end of 2026. Once we onboard Commonwealth, we will revisit share repurchases, guided by our leverage ratio at that time and our overall capital allocation frame. Moving on to capital deployment. Our framework remains focused on allocating capital aligned with the returns we generate, investing in organic growth first and foremost, pursuing M&A where appropriate, and returning excess capital to shareholders. In Q1, we deployed capital across our entire frame as we continue to invest to drive and support organic growth, allocated capital to M&A, both within our liquidity and succession program, as well as the acquisition of the investment center, and lastly, return capital to our shareholders buying back $100 million of our shares. In closing, we delivered another quarter of strong business and financial results. As we look forward, we remain excited about the opportunities we have to continue to drive growth, deliver operating leverage and create long-term shareholder value. With that, operator, please open the call for questions.

Your first question comes from the line of Devin Ryan with Citizens Bank.

I heard the prepared remarks but it would be great to get some additional context just on how the conversations have been going anecdotally. If you can frame how far through the recruiting process you are and how the financial packages are coming together relative to what you modeled. And interrelated, on the other side, the reaction from LPL advisors and other advisors in motion you’re speaking with, I’m assuming others could be excited about what this could look like pro forma or at least curious. So I’d love to get some thoughts on that as well. Thank you.

Thank you, Devin. I appreciate how you combined several questions without breaking the single question rule, which added some depth. Let’s address this directly, and feel free to ask me about any specific points I might miss. Overall, the transaction is progressing very well. We announced it in March, so we’re about five weeks into the process. It's still early, especially as we're navigating an event like this where the advisors at Commonwealth value their community and need some time to process the announcement. However, we are on track with our expectations and aiming for a 90% retention target. There’s been significant discussion in the marketplace concerning the deal, highlighting the strength of the Commonwealth brand and the high caliber of their advisors, which aligns with our expectations for a franchise of this quality. In recent weeks, we’ve collaborated closely with the Commonwealth team, and I have been personally involved with their advisors. Our teams have engaged through both in-person and virtual meetings. Recent conferences have allowed us to participate jointly and share our combined value propositions. We maintain ongoing engagement with the Commonwealth leadership to ensure we accurately communicate with all their advisors. This week alone, I had some valuable interactions, including a memorable bike ride in Scottsdale with Dan and Carrie Penis along with 21 other advisors and their families, and a blind wine tasting with Reagan Sailor and Wes Botto. I also had lunch on Sunday in Sacramento with Leslie Roper Day, who has some interesting family connections. These informal discussions have helped us understand where advisors stand, and they are keen to conduct thorough due diligence while exploring the future of Commonwealth. The feedback I’m getting from these conversations has been very positive. The advisors are asking insightful questions, which reflects their professionalism. Over the past two weeks at two conferences, it’s clear that Commonwealth operates like a tight-knit community that feels almost familial. We are fully committed to preserving that community, their experience, culture, and capabilities. Advisors at Commonwealth can expect to keep everything that makes Commonwealth special while also benefiting from enhancements that will elevate their experience. This includes maintaining the brand, premium service models, their leadership team, and significant resources for training and onboarding Commonwealth service professionals. We will ensure a smooth transition, and we have a strong track record of executing large-scale conversions, with over 90% of Commonwealth accounts transitioning without needing to repaper. Moreover, Commonwealth advisors will enjoy our industry-leading platform, more flexible technology, a comprehensive product lineup, extensive research, and unique offerings like our liquidity and succession services. Overall, we feel excellent about the value we are offering to Commonwealth advisors and the overall transaction. Now, to address your inquiry about how LPL advisors are responding, I can tell you that there is nearly unanimous support among LPL advisors for this collaboration with Commonwealth. Many of our advisors have built strong friendships with those at Commonwealth and have held them in high esteem for years. They are excited to be part of a larger ecosystem that includes advisors from both firms. They recognize that much of the positive culture at Commonwealth will also enrich LPL. The enhancements to our service experience, real-time feedback collection, responsive culture, and alignment create a unique synergy between these top firms in the independent advisor marketplace. The advisors truly appreciate the harmony emerging from this combination. Across the board, I’m receiving enthusiastic recognition from our LPL advisors about the opportunity to integrate Commonwealth’s best practices while also joining a community that includes some of their closest friends.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Chubak with Wolfe Research.

Good afternoon, Rich and Matt, and thanks so much for taking my questions. I did want to ask on expenses. So encouraging to see the tightening of the core G&A range and moving that upper bound lower. I was hoping we can get some additional context around the source of those efficiencies and your confidence in the ability to deliver positive operating leverage while still making the necessary investments in the services platform and deploying that firm-wide leveraging the Commonwealth offering?

Yes, Stephen. I think the headline is the conviction is high. I think even when you just look at what we talked about on guidance for just this quarter, right? I think when you maybe a little bit of context first in our core G&A growth rates. As you know well, going back just a couple of years ago, we’re in the double-digit range, 15% in 2023. And just the plans for this year to be down to 6% to 8%. And then just one quarter in a year, I think you know as well, it’s not very often that we would update our guidance just after one quarter. And I think that gets to the heart of your question on the confidence that we have in delivering operating. And we’re making great progress already. And these, to your question on the things that we are doing and the source of those, it’s kind of basic things, but I think we are very focused on executing. It’s automating manual processes, it’s reducing friction in the system that leads to fewer calls into the service center. It leads to fewer errors in documents that both frustrate advisors and our teams on our side have to process them. So it’s the types of investments that I think it’s a rarity where you can invest a dollar in something, not only does it reduce costs, but it also improves the client experience and improves our employee experience. So kind of a three for one on what we’re delivering here. So I think our conviction is high and of course, we’ll continue to update along the way. But this is something and maybe just to add to it, it’s not just about our conviction being high for 2025. I think this is something that has really been something we focused on before, but I think with the focus, the enhanced focus we have now, I’d describe it as more ingrained in our culture. Because this, again to repeat the point, if we can do something that improves our client experience, our employee experience, and drops savings to the bottom line, meaning our investor experience, there’s it’s kind of a no brainer to really, really focus on that. And I think to your point on how we can continue to do that while still investing in the services group, still investing to deliver and support the Commonwealth experience, they’re related. That is the reason that we can do that. The reason that we can just deliver and support those services and those capabilities because we are getting more efficient, more effective at the rest of the company. So it’s all connected, but the headline point perhaps is obvious. We’re excited about the progress we've made so far and our conviction on continuing to do this remains high.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Cyprys with Morgan Stanley.

Hey, Rich. Hey, Matt. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe just on the recruiting pipeline, maybe you could just speak to that for a moment just in terms of how you see that shaping up in this more volatile backdrop here across the markets. Curious what you’re seeing, what your expectations are for LPL, but also the broader industry. Do you see advisor movement slowing of change? Do you think there’s scope for advisor movement to pick up? And how are you seeing the pipeline shape up across your various channels? Thank you.

Yes. Hey. Thanks, Michael. It’s Rich. So maybe kind of let me try to hit those in turn. I think as we’ve looked over, you know, we’ve seen a new normal in the adviser movement. It’s moved to about 5% movement in or around that range. Historically, we have been used to seeing adviser movements sitting at six, sometimes cresting as high as six and a half percent range. And so when you think about the environment that we’re in today, it does feel like we’re in the new normal. Now for us, while we see that as potentially the new normal and would be opportunistic if it were to move higher, you see us continuing to deliver improved results because that’s reflective of our win rates continuing to move higher. I think you can see that in our Q1 results. And I think you’ve seen that sustainably over the last quarters as well as the last couple of years. We have heard a little bit in the marketplace around an enhanced competitive landscape. That doesn’t feel much different than the competitive landscape we’ve been in before, but we have heard, as you have heard from several peers, that they are intended to change their transition assistance to try to drive more capture. But I would remind you that as we talk to advisers, and we probably talk to more advisers on the move than any other firm in the industry, they’re looking for a firm that has capabilities, technology, and service that is unparalleled. That’s the first. Then they look at ongoing economics for which I can tell you even in the throes of this Commonwealth recruiting event, what we see from ourselves relative to competitive peers are, they may be throwing large TA, but their ongoing economics are not compelling relative to ours. And the third thing that advisors will look at is transition assistant rates. And so we feel really confident that the appeal of our model continues to strengthen, and we should be able to maintain our industry-leading capture of advisers in motion. Now specific to an environment that looks a little more volatile, and I think that’s what we’ve seen recently is a little more volatility. Historically, when we’ve seen more volatile market environments, you will see sometimes advisors push out moves. That’s what we’re used to. Those advisors don’t not move, but they’re oftentimes they don’t want to be out of the marketplace during a highly volatile experience for their end investors or their clients. So you can see the push that may move and give you a little bit of idiosyncratic results quarter to quarter. But over a longer arc, those advisers are still going to move firms. We continue to see in our pipelines that we’re having really good conversations. We continue to see the pipelines grow. But I would say I’m probably a little bit wary of what will happen in a continued volatile market just around the margins as to whether some of that movement doesn’t push out a quarter or two.

Your next question comes from the line of Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs.

So maybe just building on that last question around the current environment. It feels like the underlying client, the wealth client, the customer has been kind of hanging in a little bit better in this market sell-off than what we’ve seen in the past. So maybe talk a little bit about just the same store sale dynamics in the book that you’ve seen through this market volatility, to what extent that differs maybe from other periods of market sell-off? And as part of that, the obligatory question on cash and where that stands would be helpful. Thanks.

Alex. So let’s talk about same store sales. So for us, same store sales has been a real point of emphasis certainly over the last couple of years to continue to build more support into our advisers and give them the tools and capabilities to consistently grow their practice. We’ve done that through building more growth coaching programs, through having more active engagement and financial planning, being active in the marketplace to help our advisors as they think about brokerage to advisory. And you can look at some even teaming and structure of teams. And so we’ve continued to enhance our support of our advisors’ same store sales by building a robust team and support network to help them implement not only best practices, but even not just learn about best practices, but in practice, you know, if they want to do more planning, our business solutions come into the fold in a very material way. We’ve got support of high net worth services and helping them win high net worth cases. As well, we have paraplanners and advanced planning teams that can help them not only with straightforward planning, but with advanced planning capabilities, including tax planning and estate planning. And so for us, we’ve been building a more and more robust set of services and solutions in support of our advisors. And likewise, we’ve seen strengthening in our same store sales that we think hope we hope is going to be sustainable across a longer arc. In this market segment, I think you’re probably right during this movement, we’ve seen what you get to in volatility, Alex. It’s not it’s a little bit different than the adviser discussion we just had, which is that in volatility, advisers may stay put. What you’ll see in volatility for end investors is a flight to quality. And in fact, what you will see is more often than not a flight out of robo solutions, self-serve solutions, self-directed solutions into advisers, reflecting this resilient market reflecting this resilient offering that we support in the marketplace, which is the best advisors in the industry delivering advice to end investors and investors are looking for support. They’re looking for advice. They’re looking for guidance. You will see that in the form of financial advisers. And so it wouldn’t surprise me that across highly volatile times, what you would see is advisers seeing winning more and more new clients while losing fewer clients at the same time. So, that’s kind of maybe a broad brush strokes over same store sales and I’ll let Matt hit the cash question.

And Alex, given we’re sitting here in May, I’ll give maybe a bit of a comprehensive update on April, starting with cash to your question. So, as I think you know well, but just to emphasize for everybody, there are two seasonal factors in April from a cash standpoint. The biggest is annual tax payments typically occur primarily in that month. That reduced cash for us by around $2.5 billion and then the normal month one of a quarter advisory fees are the highest month in the first month of the quarter, which brought cash down around $1.5 billion. So you put those two things together, just from a seasonal standpoint, cash was down over a little over $4 billion in the month. Outside of that though, normal activity had cash grow by almost $3 billion so you net all of that out and April cash decreased by about $1.3 billion to a total of around $51.8 billion which I would describe as being a bit better than typical or a bit better than expected for the month of April. On the organic growth side, similar seasonality for April, both those items, taxes and advisory fees also reduced NNA by about three percentage points. And when you factor that in, April organic growth came in around 4%, So 7% prior to those two seasonal factors. One thing I would remind though for NNA for Q2 is those large OSJ separations that we discussed a few quarters back. They collectively served around $20 billion of assets, $9 billion of that has off boarded so far through Q1. So we have $11 billion to go, which we expect the majority of that to be in Q2 and potentially into Q3. So just keep that in mind for the quarter. And then lastly, given again we are sitting here in May, just pointing to where April overall AUM ended with the market headwinds offsetting the organic growth that we had. April ended right around where March did, so around $1.8 billion right. So, a little bit of a unique update given we’re already sitting here in month two, but hope that helps.

Your next question comes from the line of Dan Fan with Jefferies.

You guys obviously have a lot going on, on the platform. I was hoping to get an update on the integration and onboarding of Atria and PRU, and really how that’s tracking versus the original kind of estimates and expectations you gave us when those deals were announced.

Sure. I’ll start with Atria. So overall, we’re on track, right? If you remember, we closed in Q4 last year. We’re on track to meet our estimate of 80% retention, which would be around $88 billion of assets. And then in terms of the run rate EBITDA, nothing has changed there, even despite a little bit of a market pullback. We anticipate still hitting that run rate benefit from an EBITDA standpoint of $150 million by the end of this year. And then maybe just an update on the conversions which have begun. We mentioned that a little bit in the prepared remarks, but we’ve got as a reminder seven conversions to do in total. We just did the first two just this last weekend. Two conversions with two different custodians, which is not an easy thing to do. And I would tell you, overall, the conversions went really well. And I think it’s just a testament to that team, the capabilities that we built, the experience that we have in really doing the conversions. So those went well. So five more to go, and those will happen over the next couple of quarters. And then the revenue and expense synergies really follow for that. So headline is going well and in line with those estimates. With respect to Prudential, we’ve now completed that onboarding, which led to an overall $67 billion of assets coming onto the platform, $27 billion of that was this quarter. And that was a bit better than the numbers at announcement, which were expected to be $60 million that flows through a bit to the EBITDA contribution as well. So we had initially expected a $70 million run rate. And with those incremental assets, as well as syncing up the rest of the model, we now expect to hit a run rate of $80 million of EBITDA from Prudential. And we’re about through the quarter, we’re about halfway there on that. And so the rest of the synergies will come through. And one of the big drivers of that is the cash balances as they make their way into our cash sweep program. That’s driven by trading activity. So that will shift over the remainder of this year. Hard to predict because it is trading activity, but I think we’ve done this enough times. If history is a guide, by the end of this year, the majority of those balances will shift it over. So that should lead to that $80 million of run rate EBITDA from Prudential.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Brown with Wells Fargo.

The pace of institution wins has continued at a high pace. I just wanted to check-in how is the pipeline looking for activity there? And what is kind of the right cadence for you now on an annual basis?

Yes. Thanks. Appreciate the question. It’s Rich. So I think maybe I’ll take a step back and we’ll answer the question, but I wanted to give you guys maybe a bit of a broader perspective. You know, as we look at a couple of markets. First is we look at the large bank market where we really have exerted leadership in that market, and we’ve successfully attracted a $120 billion in assets to date, including First Horizon, which we announced earlier in Q2. That large bank opportunity sits around a $1.5 trillion market opportunity. And, again, I like our position in that market because we’re usually the first call you’re going to make as you begin exploring, thinking about a partnered outsourced model, and we continue to make enhancements to our experiences and delivery in that marketplace to continue that leadership. And then subsequently, we’ve expanded our offering into that insurance BD as well as product manufacturers, which for us again represents an additional $1.5 trillion market opportunity. As Matt alluded to, we completed that conversion potentially in Q1, which I think as well gives us a run rate client at scale who can reflect on the experiences, the ease of the transition, and then the ongoing value in the partnership. Now all of those, both leadership in those two marketplaces, would reflect in our pipeline as we continue to add to a deep list of potential partners considering. But I would, you know, I would give you one other perspective coming here. And given the critical work we have ahead of us to complete the HR onboarding and to prepare for the acquisition of Commonwealth, we’re really focusing our resources on delivering a seamless experience for those new advisers joining our platform and while ensuring we continue to deliver a great experience for our existing advisers. I wouldn’t expect too much by way of other large announcements for the time being.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Katz with TD Cowen.

Okay. Thank you very much for taking the question this evening. Just coming back to the knock on effects with the Commonwealth transaction. More interested now in terms of what the strategic responses by some of the smaller players and whether or not the combination or the pro forma combination might unlock more opportunities to consolidate strategically versus just through regular way financial advisor wins. Thank you.

So I guess, Bill, I’ll take a cut at it, Rich, and then you redirect me if you don’t feel like you’re getting the answer to the question you asked. So I think what we’ve seen in the marketplace is a lot of activity regarding Commonwealth Advisors, as I alluded to. But to be completely frank with you, I’m not sure that there are a lot of credible players that Commonwealth Advisors would consider as an alternative to LPL. I think there are a couple out there, and they’re being very active. I think you see a lot of the smaller players trying to take and assert themselves into this market opportunity. And I think it’s just going to be a struggle for them to be competitive relative to our robust set of capabilities, especially when you think about how we have been very clear that we are keeping the Commonwealth experience, we are keeping the brand, that we are keeping the service associates that deliver their experience today, that we are keeping the culture, the community, the trips, study groups, the practice consultants, power, and practice consultants that help them grow. You look at that and say, that has been an exceptional franchise with an exceptional leadership team that has delivered support for advisers over forty-six years. We put that together with LPL, and it is very hard, Bill, to come credibly forward as an alternative to that. And I say whether you’re small or whether you’re large, I do not believe there is a credible alternative that is close to our experience. And when you put on top of that the fact that we are going to go through a non-conversion event, meaning that largely these advisors, as I mentioned over 90% of their accounts will not have to be repapered. They will keep the continuity of the service experience. They will not change their brand. They will not have to explain to their clients a major change. They will not have to be out of the marketplace for 30, 60, 90 days as they work through repapering. I think it leads to, I’m hopeful that we will continue to reflect our capabilities, stay humble, and have the Commonwealth Advisors realize that this buying firm will be the leader, not just in the ten ninety-nine segment, but across wealth management. And quite honestly, I would say for advisers, you want to be with a firm that is changing the industry, not reacting to industry change. And that’s the orientation of this firm. We are shaping where the industry is headed. We are pushing forward to serve advisors in new and differentiated ways while recognizing that advisors are our number one constituent and we serve them. Now you asked about whether small firms can continue to participate in the marketplace. I’m sure they will have the ability to carve unique positions in the market. But I think day by day, it becomes more challenging for players that are not at scale to compete effectively with firms like ourselves who not only have scale and capacity to invest, but have been committed. And I think we are unique in the marketplace in that we have committed to the flexibility to ensure that unique communities and service experiences that have first been demonstrated through our newer affiliation models but subsequently will be demonstrated through our Commonwealth partnership where we will allow them to feel flexible and small while gaining the scale and capabilities of a leading player in the marketplace. Just think it gets challenging day after day for smaller players to continue to compete. It doesn’t mean it’s impossible. There are some great players in the marketplace, but I think it’s harder.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Schmitt with William Blair.

How does your internal capacity look for onboarding deals and partnerships? Obviously, you’ve done quite a few. Just curious if you’re seeing any constraints, will you need to build that out further as these deals get bigger? Or do you think you can continue with deals at this pace?

Hey, Jeff. I’ll answer that one. I think just maybe building a little bit on what Rich was saying earlier in my comments. I think from a capacity standpoint and a team standpoint, I think we’ve built a great team and tools and capabilities to bring if you just look at what we’ve done in the last twelve months and we’re working on right now, to be able to have a really, really high capacity. I think that said, you look at what we have in front of us specifically right now on beginning the Atria conversions and specifically getting ready for Commonwealth. Building on Rich’s point earlier, I think that the recruiting pipeline continues to be quite large. The dialogue continues to be quite good. But I think from a timing standpoint, we’re going to be quite focused on those two initiatives and doing those really, really well for those teams and those advisors. So I wouldn’t expect any announcements of other large deals in the near term because I think we’ve got enough to focus on right now, but that doesn’t take away from the opportunity that we would have over the long term. It’s more of a prioritization of the work that we have in front of us right now.

Your last question comes from the line of Benjamin Budish with Barclays.

Hey, this is Chris O’Brien on for Ben. I wanted to hit on annuity sales. It looks like they’ve been pretty strong at LPL. And when we look at the LIMR data, it looks like LPL is outperforming meaningfully. So is there any way you can just tell us what you’re seeing in terms of activity in annuity sales? And how much of this growth has been driven from the recent acquisitions? Thank you.

Yes. I think on I mean, we are the large distributor of annuities, so it’s a strong part of our business. I think that when you just look at the trends in this quarter, I think you’ve got two things going on. One is bringing Prudential fully on board, right? They’re a big part of their business is annuity sales. It is insurance. And I think when you see the trends in sales commissions and specifically annuities, just looking at this quarter, that’s probably three-fourths of it. It’s really Prudential coming fully on board and ramped up on the platform. And the other quarter is our core business and I think it speaks to the diversification of serving and supporting both the advisory business and a brokerage business being in an environment where whether it be the volatility, the level of interest rates, whether it be variable annuities, fixed annuities, that’s a product that matters and is relevant to a lot of our advisors’ clients. And I think we have that offer that 25% of that growth is really just our overall client base wanting and needing and having those products. That said, there is a macro driver in that. So as interest rates kind of have leveled off, as volatility has started to come down, I wouldn’t be surprised if sales commissions, because they are primarily driven by those products come down a bit in future quarters. But I think back to our core offering, it is a big part of our core offering. And as we grow the business with firms like Prudential, this is an area where you see those benefits come through.

That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Steinmeier for closing remarks.

Thank you so much, operator, and thank you all for joining us. We look forward to speaking with you again in July. Have a great night.

That concludes today’s call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.