Welcome to the Lexicon Pharmaceutical Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-in mode. Following the management's prepared remarks, we will hold a brief question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this call is being recorded today, November 6, 2025. I will now turn the call over to Lisa Di Francesco, Senior Vice President for Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for Lexicon. Please go ahead, Lisa.

Thank you, Mila. Good morning and welcome to our third quarter 2025 conference call. Joining me today are Dr. Mike Exson, Lexicon's Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Craig Granowitz, Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer, and Scott Chianti, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. This morning, Lexicon issued a press release announcing our financial results for the third quarter of 2025, which is available on our website at www.lexpharma.com and through our SEC filing. A webcast of this call, along with the slide presentation, is also available on our website. During the call, we will also review the information provided in the press release, provide a corporate update, and then use the remainder of our time to answer your questions. Before we begin, let me remind you that we will be making forward-looking statements, including statements related to the safety, efficacy, clinical development, regulatory status, and therapeutic and commercial potential of Pilevapidin, LX-9851, Sotagliflozin, and our other drug programs, as well as our business generally. These statements may include characterizations and projections relating to the clinical development, regulatory status, and market opportunity for our drug programs, and the commercial performance of MPEFA for heart failure. This call may also contain forward-looking statements relating to our growth and future operating results, discovery and development of our drug candidates, strategic alliances, in intellectual property, as well as other matters that are not historical facts or information. Various risks may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. And we refer you to our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and our other SEC filings for detailed information describing such risks. I would now like to turn the call over to Mike Exson. Mike?

Okay, great. Thank you, Lisa, and good day, everyone. Great to to have you all with us this morning. We're really excited to give you updates on this quarter and all the great work that's going on here at Lexicon. Now, as we approach the final weeks of the year, I wanted to really begin by re-grounding you on the ambitious set of strategic imperatives that we set out at the start of this year, which were designed to drive long-term value for the company. Now, these goals were, firstly, to progress Pilavapitin to be ready for phase three registrational trials, Secondly, submit an IND for LX9851, our novel non-incretined candidate in obesity. Thirdly, to recruit patients and accelerate recruitment into our ongoing phase 3 clinical trial in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or HCM, named Sonata. Continue the ongoing discussions with FDA on Zinqlista and establish a path forward in type 1 diabetes. and finally to add targeted partnerships to maximize the value of our R&D programs. Now, throughout the past three quarters, we've made really excellent progress, not only against these goals, but within our pipeline and across our organization. In addition, we've continued to make strategic decisions to further advance our position across cardiometabolic disease with high unmet need. In so doing, we've successfully repositioned the company to really focus on R&D. We've achieved this focus by developing our innovative pipeline, maximizing operational efficiency, and elevating the focus on targeted partnering. So allow me to outline the substantial progress in R&D. For Pilavapitin, we recently presented a post-hoc analysis of the aggregated results of our Phase two program in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain or DPNP all of our findings to date reinforce the broad clinical potential for this novel molecule as well as its phase three readiness and we're working with the FDA on next steps as well as engaging with potential partners for LX9851 I'm really pleased to say that we've completed our IND enabling studies and as you know earlier this year we entered into an exclusive agreement with a strong partner who have the capabilities to develop this asset as quickly and as broadly as possible. And finally for Sotica flows and all 130 plus sites are now active in our Phase 3 Sonata study in HCM which is the only Phase 3 HCM program enrolling both obstructive and non-obstructive subtypes. Now operationally we are very mindful of resource utilization here at Lexicon across all parts of the business. This has enabled us to significantly reduce our operating expenses while preserving investment in areas where we believe we have the highest probability of value creation. Embedding an efficiency mindset has also resulted in us implementing innovative ways to drive our business forward. For example, as many of you are aware, a substantial proportion of the current evidence generation for soda is conducted and funded by third parties. On the commercial side of our business, we've recently introduced an innovative virtual sales support system for Impepper here in the US, as we look to move Impepper from a stable break-even business to a growing profitable revenue stream for Lexicon in 2026 and beyond. Now, before Craig takes us through specific updates on the pipeline, I'd like to take a few moments to talk about some other internal and external pillars that we believe will continue to positively shape our business moving forward. First of all, as we continue to advance the science and explore the clinical potential of our assets, strategic and thoughtful partnering is vital to increasing the likelihood of our potential products reaching patients. Now, we've demonstrated our ability to partner with strong organizations, and I'm really impressed not only by the capability and drive our partners are demonstrating, but how seamlessly and effectively our teams are really working together, and we can already see our strategy in action. Firstly, we're working closely with Beatrice on expanding the reach of soda for heart failure in major markets and territories outside of the US and Europe, and they're making really excellent progress, really, really happy with that partnership with VEATRIS. Secondly, we aim to maximize the potential of LX9851 with our licensee Novo Nordisk, who, as you know, are a global expert in obesity and related conditions, and our recent completion of IND enabling studies of LX9851 and obesity means that we may earn up to $30 million in near-term milestone payments as LX9851 enters future phases of development. Lastly, partnership discussions are ongoing with Pilavapitin, where we aim to collaborate with a high-quality partner to unlock the pipeline and appeal potential of this asset globally and across multiple indications. So our approach to partnership remains flexible, as we aim to stay focused internally on our core cardiometabolic expertise. Second, I'd like to turn your attention to Zincquista, as our engagement with the FDA has progressed significantly. In September, we shared that we've submitted additional data to the FDA supporting the benefit-risk profile of Zinqvista as an adjunct to insulin for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. These data were from an ongoing third-party funded investigator-sponsored trials of Zinqvista and were submitted as part of a type D process to address the concerns the FDA had raised in its December 2024 complete response letter. Now, we feel that these data support a positive benefit risk of Zinquista and address the concerns raised. And we're committed to working with the FDA on a path forward. In fact, the agency confirmed that they expect to provide written feedback by the end of this year. And following alignment with the FDA, Lexicon would target a resubmission as early as possible in 2026. And finally, with healthcare on the political agenda in D.C. and beyond, we see positive shifts and opportunities in this environment for our portfolio now one area where this is particularly apparent is neuropathic pain management neuropathic pain is a type of chronic pain in which there's been little advancement in treatments for over two decades despite its significant impact on patients quality of life for those with chronic pain many are prescribed oral opioids despite the known serious risks of misuse better safer options are not only needed but in fact being demanded and they've been three major developments this quarter that I want to update you on firstly as a part of our advocacy efforts this year Lexicon convened the first ever chronic pain roundtable in DC with representatives across clinical patient and payer communities we're really inspired by this discussion with all of these experts all of whom are actively advocating for recognition of chronic pain in legislation and the need for new innovation and access to non-opioid treatment options. Second and most recently, just a few days ago, a new bill, the Relief of Chronic Pain Act, was introduced into the US Senate to increase access to non-opioid therapies for Medicare patients with chronic pain. And finally, the FDA recently issued new draft guidance to expand non-opioid options for chronic pain management. So these three factors, together with additional legislative efforts that are currently making their way through Congress, really underscore the critical bipartisan demand for opioid alternatives in pain management. So overall, we're encouraged to see that not only these signals from the broader legislative environment, but also other important catalysts for change. From regulatory openness, evolving access dynamics, AI exploration, and overall changes in clinical care, all of these changes are huge opportunities for our company. And so with that, I'll turn it over to Craig to further update you on our assets under development. Over to you, Craig.

Thank you, Mike. As Mike mentioned, we have made significant progress across our pipeline this year. It has been a busy and productive three quarters. I'd like to begin with pilavapitin, our novel non-opioid AAK1 inhibitor. Data and analyses from three separate Phase II trials in neuropathic pain provide evidence of consistent and clinically meaningful pain reduction and validate the response and tolerability profiles of pill of apidin. While our lead indication in DPNP represents a mature clinical program, several secondary indications are also Phase II ready, providing significant expansion opportunities. In addition, the AAK pathway is central to a number of cellular processes, such as synaptic signaling between neurons. With this in mind, we've also conducted IND-enabling work in multiple neuroscience indications, underscoring pilovapidin as a potential pipeline in a pill. We've accumulated data from more than 600 patients treated with pilovapidin and have demonstrated a well understood and acceptable safety and tolerability profile. Finally, patent protection on the Pilevapidin molecule extends through 2040 when including an anticipated five-year extension. This provides a long period of exclusivity to maximize the value of any investment related to this asset. For the past several weeks, we have presented data on pilivapidin and DPNP at a number of important medical meetings. For context, earlier this year, we shared top-line result data from PROGRESS, our Phase 2B study of pilivapidin in patients with DPNP. The study met its objective of identifying 10 milligrams as the appropriate dose to advance into Phase 3 development. Since that time, we have completed additional post hoc analyses and an additional renal impairment study to further clarify the product profile. We set out to achieve a few objectives with these analyses. One, to investigate an exposure response relationship. Second, to evaluate adherence across treatment arms. Third, to validate the robustness of the 10 milligram dose. And finally, to confirm the safety and tolerability profile by evaluating pilovapidin's pharmacokinetic profile in a broader patient population. The post hoc progress and relief analysis that we presented in September and October successfully addressed these key objectives, leading us to a few important conclusions. There is a linear relationship between increased plasma levels of pilovapidin and reduction in pain score. The post-hoc analysis confirmed the biological activity of this drug. Second, pilovapidin's effects on pain is clinically meaningful. Notably, the 10-milligram dose achieved a two-point drop in ADPS from baseline by week 12. Third, the 10-milligram dose demonstrates an acceptable powerability profile with nearly the same percentage of patients completing the study on treatment arm as the placebo arms. And lastly, we conducted additional human studies that have concluded there are no cardiac signals such as QTC prolongation, and in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, no pilovapidin dose adjustments will be required. These are important findings that support a broader potential patient population to be included in the Phase III studies. So, what's next for pilivapidin? With the results from our Phase II program, our request for an end of Phase II meeting with the FDA has been granted. We are scheduled to meet with the agency by the end of this year and receive written feedback from the agency by early next year. In parallel, we are progressing our planning for a Phase III program in DPMP. We have incorporated the input from our Scientific Advisory Board, who were supportive of our phased redevelopment approach, as well as elements from the recent guidance from the FDA on non-opioid clinical development. In conjunction with this activity, we continue to have ongoing engagement with potential partners. Now, to shift our attention to sotoglifosin, where we believe our opportunity continues to strengthen with time, MPEPA has remained on the market in the U.S., we see steady sales from our base of loyal prescribers. We also continue to build distinguishing evidence from investigator-initiated studies supporting sodaglifosin's mechanism in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and in major adverse cardiac events, or MACE. Beyond heart failure, which sodaglifosin has been approved in the U.S. based on clinical data from two large outcome studies, enrollment in our Phase III program of sodaglifosin in HCM continues to accelerate. And lastly, as Mike outlined earlier, we are maintaining close communication with the FDA about the potential resubmission of Zynqlista in type 1 diabetes. We strongly believe these three factors are integral in establishing sodaglifosin's potential as a new class of therapy. We have three upcoming data presentations this week at the AHA scientific sessions and the HCM society meetings, which will highlight sodiclifosin's unique potential across diverse patient populations. As you may know, cardiac care is complex, involving multimodal treatment in an effort to improve overall patient outcomes. Of particular importance for us, many patients who have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy go on to experience major adverse cardiac events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart At this weekend's meetings, Dr. Quinn from Boston University Medical Center, Dr. Badaman from Mount Sinai in New York City, and Dr. McGuire from the University of Texas will highlight, respectively, sodoglifosin's impact on cardiac remodeling in HCM, an AHA late breaker on the benefits of sotoglifosin and HFPEF, and a presentation on the effects of MACE events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sonata HCM is a large global registration trial with a KCCQ endpoint designed to support a regulatory filing and broad label in HCM. Sonata HCM is the only ongoing registrational trial currently evaluating a treatment in both obstructive and non-obstructive HCM. We recently completed the target 130-plus site initiations in 20 countries across the United States, Europe, Israel, and Latin America. This is an important milestone for the program, and I couldn't be more proud of the team's significant efforts in achieving this goal. With these site initiations complete, there has been a significant acceleration in study I'll now turn over to Scott to provide an update on the company's financials.

Thank you, Craig, and good morning, everyone. For the third quarter of 2025, we reported total revenue of $14.2 million compared to total revenue of $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2024. Q3 2025 revenue consisted primarily of $13.2 million of licensing revenue recognized from our agreement with Novo Nordisk. Licensing revenue under this agreement is being recognized as the IND-enabling work is completed. Through September 30, 2025, a total of $40.7 million has been recognized as licensing revenue from this agreement, with the remaining $4.3 million expected to be recognized in Q4. Total revenue for the quarter also included net product revenue of $1 million from sales of MPEFA. Research and development expenses for the third quarter of 2025 decreased to $18.8 million from $25.8 million in Q3 2024, primarily reflecting lower external research expenses associated with the completion of our PROGRESS clinical trial, partially offset by increased investment in our Sonata Phase III clinical trial in HCM. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2025 decreased to $7.6 million compared to $39.6 million in 2024. The continued decrease reflects lower costs as a result of our strategic repositioning in late 2024 and significantly reduced marketing efforts in 2025 for IMPEFA, as well as general diligence and focus on operating our business efficiency. Net loss for the third quarter of 2025 was $12.8 million, or $0.04 per share, as compared to a net loss of $64.8 million, or $0.18 per share in the corresponding period in 2024. We ended the third quarter with $145 million in cash, short-term investments, and restricted cash, as compared to $238 million as of December 31, 2024. I would also like to note a few other items from the quarter. On the expense side, we continue to reduce costs and streamline our operations. Quarter over quarter operating expenses decreased by 39.1 million, primarily due to the strategic repositioning as an R&D focused company. We are maintaining our full year 2025 guidance for operating expenses. Total operating expenses are expected to remain between 105 and 115 million, with R&D expenses projected to be between $70 and $75 million, SG&A expenses are expected to range between $35 and $40 million. Our R&D expense assumptions do not include costs associated with Phase III pivotal studies of pilavapitin, as our goal would be to take this asset forward with a development partner. Overall, we are in a strong position with the resources needed to advance our ongoing clinical programs while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation and a focus on creating value for our shareholders. I will now turn it back to Mike for his closing remarks.

Yeah, thanks, Scott. Look, you can see that we have achieved quite a lot already in 2025, and I'm excited about where we continue our strong execution to wrap up this year. As I shared earlier regarding Pillar Vapidon, we're planning for an end of Phase 2 meeting by year's end. Our preclinical work continues as we explore the broad potential value of this asset and evaluate expansion into additional indications. Additionally, a partnership for pilovapidin will allow us to become therapeutically focused on our core cardiometabolic programs and expertise. For soda in HCM, we're really excited to share results from complementary studies of soda starting this upcoming weekend with AHA which could provide valuable additional insights on this therapeutic candidate. In parallel, our Sonata study sites in the US, EU, Israel and LATAM are enrolling according to plan with all phase three sites up and running. For in PAPRI, our partner Vietras continues to make progress against plans for regulatory approval. Zodogoplozin was recently approved in UAE and now has been submitted for approval in Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, where there are a significant number of potential patients in need. In addition, Vietrus has announced plans to submit for approval in additional markets, including Mexico and Malaysia, by the end of this year. That's a total of six important markets to be filed by the end of the year, and we're thrilled with the momentum that we're building together with Vietrus. For Zinquista, we're working closely with the FDA on a potential path forward for T1D. The agency confirmed that they expect to provide written feedback by year's end. And following alignment with the FDA, we'd work to submit our NDA as early as possible in 2026. And finally, LX9851, our IND enabling studies for obesity have been completed. And we anticipate that NOVO will expediently prepare and file the IND and advance into clinical development. So looking ahead to 2026, we plan to maintain focus on what we believe makes Lexicon well-positioned for success. We've got a strong pipeline of differentiated assets, not only first-in-class, but first-to-market potential in therapeutic areas of high and met need. We're excited to embrace these opportunities and showcase what we achieve going into next year in our future updates. So we've got time now for some Q&A, so I'll turn it back over to the operator to manage the questions.

Thank you very much. At this time, we will now conduct a question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please star 11 again. Please stand by as we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Andrew Tsai from Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Hey, guys. Congrats on the progress. This is John on for Andrew. So, for Zinquista and type 1 diabetes, you're seeking regulatory feedback in Q4. Are you looking for, like, a simple yes or no, or just looking for, like, whether a resubmission would make sense, or is there, like, perhaps more color that you're seeking? And then, if you're able to resubmit in 2026, would it be a Class 1 or Class 2 resubmission?

Yeah, thank you for the question, John. It's Craig Granowitz. It's, as Mike has mentioned and we've discussed previously, we're really leveraging ongoing trials, particularly the STENO trial in Denmark, to use the exposure data in a very large number of patients to address the single concern that FDA raised at their end of review meeting, which is a prospective study to document rates of diabetic ketoacidosis. And as you might recall, and as the CRL letter that was made public by the FDA a few months ago mentioned, FDA accepts that there is efficacy with this drug, has meaningful reductions in A1C, meaningful reductions in severe hypo effects, and obviously the proven outcome that we've already seen and the labeling we have in patients with type 1 diabetes and heart failure. So, we are using the steno trial with adequate levels of exposure, which is what we're really discussing with the FDA, to prepare a submission really focused on that one single issue. To answer your second question, while we don't have final written confirmation of this with the FDA, our expectations that this would be, as a resubmission, a six-month review clock.

I think, John, just to provide a little more color from my side, I think what's really pleasing here is that the FDA has endorsed and accepted that the steno protocol and patients that they're capturing are acceptable, and the way they're capturing DKA is acceptable. So as we move forward, it really is around appropriate exposure levels to be able to give them confidence that the positive data that we are seeing gives them confidence for resubmission.

Great. Thanks so much. And then maybe one more if I can. For those third-party IST studies for SODA and HCM and HFPEF, how do you expect the non-HCM data to perhaps give you greater conviction in the Phase III Sonata study success?

Yeah, it's a great question. You know, clearly there's an overlap between HEF-PEF and HCM. From a clinical standpoint, they are, in essence, indistinguishable. You see a very similar profile. You have normal ejection fraction, but you have patients that have symptomatic dysfunction, particularly diastolic dysfunction. And I think, as you've seen with the CMIs, they're actually trying to go from HCM into HEF-PEF. I think they're having some challenges with that because a lot of patients are then developing ejection fractions that are dropping below 50%. We believe that by demonstrating data, and you'll see some of that as early as this weekend in the Sotocardia, which is an oral late breaker at AHA, as well as our continued mechanistic data that will be presented on tomorrow, actually Friday, at the HCM Society meeting. we are distinguishing the effects of soda glifosin in both the preclinical models the animal models on energetics and cardiac remodeling that will fit very nicely with some of the clinical results that you might be seeing in hefpef patients they'll be presented at the soda cardia data on saturday at hcm so it continues to build a wall of evidence that is similar between HFPEF and HCM regarding cardiac energetics, cardiac remodeling, cardiac fibrosis, and ultimately improved functionality and symptomatology in patients either with HFPEF or with HCM.

And John, again, allow me to sort of pile on there, I guess, more from a sort of commercial bent of how we see this. You know, we have this program in HCM for both obstructive and non-obstructive, thinking that a medicine that is oral once daily, easy to use, and a well-known and understandable side effect profile, particularly given the data coming out of Maple, really gives us a great opportunity potentially to work alongside CMIs, but in a first-line position in HCM. And that first-line position, particularly as you're sort of expanding outside of the HCM centers into retail cardiologists and large-scale cardiology practices, allows HEFPEF and HCM, the patients present very similarly in those offices. And so having soda as an option for both HEPPEF and a differentiated option for HEPPEF and HCM gives the cardiologist peace of mind that they can use this medicine very successfully in either condition and particularly in non-obstructive where, you know, diagnosing the difference between the two is a little more challenging. So, you know, both from a utilization as well as scientifically, we continue to generate additional data that will help support the use of this in a broad range of cardiology patients in across the cardiology community in the U.S.

Great. Thanks so much.

Our next question comes from the line of Egal Nokomovic from Citigroup. Your line is now open.

Good morning. Congrats on the progress. This is Chuan, came on for your goal. Thanks for taking our question. Maybe just two quick ones from us. Regarding the partnership opportunity in DPNP, can you orient us on how far along you are in identifying a partner and remind us whether or not you are waiting to complete the discussions from the end of Phase 2 meeting with FDA before completing any partnership agreements?

Yeah, that's a great question. So over the last, I'd say, four to six weeks, we've reengaged with a range of partners who we had originally discussed the top line data with. Obviously, the data that we presented over the last month, including the totality of the Phase 2 program, we've had the opportunity to talk with all of these partners. The end of Phase 2 meeting is a very important milestone in those discussions. I think it's fair to say in a space where there's been nothing developed for two decades, in a space where new draft guidance has come out, it's important to have that confirmation as a part of those overall discussions. So, you know, we're really looking forward now that that end of phase two meeting is scheduled for this year to continue to progress around that. We feel very confident, actually, with the dossier that we've submitted and are really looking forward to having the FDA's endorsement on what we think is a robust Phase 3 program that reflects their draft guidance, and that will certainly be a part of the partnering discussions that we're having.

Got it. And just one more, if I may. Understanding that you're seeking a broad HCM label, in your discussions with the FDA, Have they suggested the possibility that you would also be able to get approval for specifically non-obstructive or obstructive HCM if data from Sonata is stronger in one particular subgroup?

Yeah, very good question. We're approaching it similar to how we approached heart failure, and we had a broad label for heart failure, regardless of whether it was HEF-REF or HEF-PEF. And we're really taking that same approach with the FDA and the commitment we have on them when we met with them to discuss the protocol before initiating the trial was that this, if the study is positive, as conducted, would give us a label that would include both obstructive and non-obstructive patients. So we are seeking that. We are looking to have two groups of 250 patients each within the study. There's a stratification by obstructive versus non-obstructive, but the overall endpoint is anchored to the overall population.

Got it. Thanks so much. Appreciate it.

Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Pontianus from H.E. Wainwright. Your line is now open.

Hey, everybody. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. So a few as well, if you don't mind. So, first, I think it would be helpful if you remind us, you know, when Sonata moves forward and if it were to be positive, can you discuss the positioning, especially with the continued growing excitement in the HCM space and the role of CMIs and the hopefully upcoming approval of Affichampton? So, where would SOTA be positioned with regard to these other assets?

Yeah, it's a great question, Joe. So, you know, I think it's firstly important to note that patients on a CMI are actually eligible to enroll in Sonata, and we've purposefully taken the approach, again, of using a very pragmatic trial that soda can be used in conjunction with underlying meds that are used in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Now, where I would see the positioning is typical across a lot of chronic medications, in as much as those medicines that are somewhat more laborious somewhat more costly often depending on sort of where it where it ranges and you know are often positioned as sort of later lines in therapy and you know we would see sodagliflozin as we discussed a little bit earlier as being broad potential not only being used in the somewhat restrictive you know academic centers that have HCM study sites and and and clinical sites but really across the broad scope of cardiology because it's it's a known mechanism it's easy to use and if we get positive results out of Sonata in both obstructive and non obstructive it allows this broad utilization and particularly given the results of the MAPLE trial which showed that in fact beta blockers don't necessarily add any value and there's question as to whether in fact they may be causing some harm in HCM. I think that offers for us a really good opportunity to become a first-line agent in HCM both obstructive and non obstructive.

Mike if you don't mind I just want to add one other one other point. I think it's becoming more clear, Joe, and I think you've seen and heard some of these presentations even very, very recently, that all of the CMIs that are currently under regulatory review will have REMS of some sort. And that certainly does put significant paperwork and process in place for patients being initiated. I think that inherently is going to limit the sites that are willing to do that because you need to have a critical mass in order to create the paperwork flow and there'll be many places that will have HCM patients in relatively low numbers that will not be willing to take on that burden so I do think the fact that the CMIs will have REMS and there might be differentiated REMS between them but they will be what I would call significant limitations that are always a part of a REMS and we don't have any Inclination that that would be the case with with soda, which is a well-known agent that has already An indication for heart failure That's really helpful.

Thank you. And then I'll just ask my last two questions together So first with regard to the upcoming end to phase two study you've already provided some nice details around that I just want to make sure I understood you already have a lot of great feedback is there anything you would describe as questions that are left to address or finalize number one and then if Zinquista were to move forward on the regulatory front in a positive fashion what kind of commercial plan would you potentially be looking at you know bringing it forward on yourself a potential partner or you know what have you right I might throw the first one to Craig, and I'll take the second one.

Yeah, Joe, great question on the end of phase two. I think when it comes to the endpoint, the duration of the study, the patient population, I think we feel very comfortable with that, and I think that's been validated as well for other companies that are in phase three in neuropathic pain and diabetic neuropathic pain, that it will be two trials of roughly 3 to 350 patients each with a 12-week visual analog pain score with an average daily pain score outcome. I think with any centrally acting agent, some of the areas of discussion are going to be regarding potential for central effects such as drowsiness. I think there's always going to be a question with any agent in this regard, even though there is no reason to believe and we don't believe that there is any issue of human addiction potential type activities. But we don't believe that there are any meaningful or significant next day drowsiness or other central effects of this agent. And there is no indication in that large phase two program that we've run, including a blinded withdrawal that there is any issue around addiction potential. But those certainly are areas that could be points of discussion with the FDA.

Great. No, thanks. And I very much appreciate, Joe, the question on the commercialization of Zinqlister and to a degree also thinking forward for HCM. And just allow me a couple of moments here to talk a little bit more generally and philosophically about how we're commercializing sodicoplozin. As you know, you know, one of the first things that we did when I came into Lexicon was unfortunately having to relook at how we commercialize in PEPA. I want to state categorically that both Synclista and for HCM are not going to be in PEPA situations for a couple of reasons. As you know, PEPA was third to market, actually fourth, really in a space where there were three, particularly two major incumbents, and that made market access incredibly difficult. What we're seeing, actually, is that when physicians use this medicine and patients use them, it's incredibly sticky, but access was a very difficult situation. That is not the case for Xenclista and HCM. Why is that? because it will be the first and only SGLT inhibitor potentially indicated in each of these indications that does a couple of things first it allows or it allows us to completely rethink pricing in both of these indications and that has certain implications particularly in HCM where the CMIs are priced at a significant multiple to what other medicines are being used but secondly and perhaps more importantly there's not an ability at the payer level to substitute to step through and so the access conditions was in Quista and HCM are very very different now that does not mean that we intend to go with a full-blown commercial model traditional commercial model and in fact That's part of our installing the Inpepper virtual sales support system that we've got, which is all-encompassing, and we'll have an opportunity perhaps to talk you through that, which is a good way for us to learn over the coming months of how we do this in a non-traditional way, whether that be completely virtual field presence, whether that be looking at a hybrid, whether it be even partnering on co-promotion, which could be an option. We're exploring all of these details in parallel. And, of course, the other thing that makes us really excited is we have partnered with patient groups over years now, well before I joined the company. And there's interesting commercial models that we can use and utilize some of this patient-driven advocacy, like, for example, in my experience, we've seen with migraine and other conditions where patients just have this built-up, pent-up demand, and we can do it in a very unique way. So more to come on that, but we're certainly exploring how we intend to potentially promote Synquista should it come on the market.

Guys, thank you so much for all the details, and especially on the last commentary, it sounds like you have the ability to leverage a lot of optionality. So, thanks a lot. Thanks, Sarah.

Our next question comes from the line of Yasmin Rahimi from Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Hey, this is Dominic on for Yasmin Rahimi. Thank you for taking our question, and congrats on a great quarter. So, we were looking at HCA. We know it's going to be an exciting year this year, and especially considering that there's going to be a few presentations on the SGLT 1 and 2 inhibitor class in HCM and preclinical models. Could you help us understand how much proof of concept data we could gain from these presentations in HCM? Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Dominic. You know, we look at any one of these presentations, and particularly a preclinical model, as part of a broader tableau around the mechanism of action, and particularly the functionality of both the SGLT1 and the SGLT2 effects of soda, whether we're looking at the effects on stroke and MI, whether we're looking at the effects in HEF-PEF, or we're looking at the effects in HCM. And as you know, we've generated data on all of those over the past year and have published on that extensively. The data from the Boston group that will be presented tomorrow at the HCM meeting, I think, continues that narrative. And in a particular murine model, this group has a lot of experience and a long track record. And the effects that they've seen with soda in that model, and I don't want to presage their presentation, but I think are quite dramatic. And I'll just sort of provide the overview is that it's affecting the energetics. And there's some mechanistic data around the energetics effects of soda in that model. And by affecting and improving cardiac energetics, you're improving fibrosis and other cardiac remodeling, but most importantly, ultimately, diastolic function. And as you know, the major physiologic issue in HCM is diastolic stiffness. So there's really two main issues physiologically in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In obstructive, there is a physical barrier to outflow tract obstruction, and that really is what distinguishes between obstructive and non-obstructive HCM. But fundamentally, the issue that is common, whether it's obstructive or non-obstructive, is cardiac hyperdynamic function, that the actin and myosin are overly active, and there's also an issue around altered energetics. And we believe that sodaglifosin is acting on both of those fundamental physiologic characteristics. And that's why we believe, and we had strong support from the medical community and the FDA, that we could study both obstructive and non-obstructive in the same trial because the underlying pathophysiology is the same regardless of whether they are obstructive or non-obstructive, which is really defined anatomically as opposed to physiologically.

Great. Thank you for the color. That was definitely helpful. And then we just had one more. Once Pilavapitin's end of phase two meeting is complete, and I know you touched on this a little bit earlier, but how soon do you envision a partnership materializing? And then what are your thoughts on the type of deal that you could explore you would be interested in?

Yeah, I think we will continue those engagements after the end of phase two meeting and certainly into the start of 2026, I think the type of partnership that we're and the type of partners that we're engaging with are really pretty diverse. And I think that gives us optionality as to how we take our involvement with Pilavapit and forward. And so we'll continue to engage with them. You know, we'll wait for the minutes, obviously, to have that formalized, which will be in early 2026, and then we'll take it from there.

Great. Thank you so much. Thank you.

I am showing no more further questions. We will now turn it over to Mike Exson, Chief Executive Officer of Lexicon, for closing remarks.

Well, thanks very much, everyone. Thanks for the great questions. I really enjoyed those and look forward to discussing in more detail with you soon I think and I hope that what you've seen is that this year Lexicon has really put our nose to the grindstone and focused on reshaping the company and advancing our pipeline forward we have a number of great things happening in the next couple of months really as we close out the end of the year and into 2026 so look forward to sharing more information on all of those at future updates. So thanks very much and have a great day.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.