Good morning, and welcome to the earnings conference call for the period ended March 31, 2024, for MidCap Financial Investment Corporation. I will now turn the call over to Elizabeth Besen, Investor Relations Manager for MidCap Financial Investment Corporation. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone for joining us today. Speaking on today's call are Tanner Powell, Chief Executive Officer; Ted McNulty, President; and Greg Hunt, Chief Financial Officer. Howard Widra, Executive Chairman, as well as additional members of the management team are on the call and available for the Q&A portion of today's call. I'd like to advise everyone that today's webcasts are being recorded. Please note that they are the property of MidCap Financial Investment Corporation and that any unauthorized broadcast in any form is strictly prohibitive. Information about the audio replay of this call is available on press release. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary safe harbor disclosure on our press release regarding forward-looking information. Today's conference call and webcast may include forward-looking statements. You should refer to our most recent SEC filings for risks that apply to our business and that may adversely affect any forward-looking statements we make. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements or projections unless required by law. To obtain copies of our SEC filings, please visit either the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or our website at www.midcapfinancialic.com. I'd also like to remind everyone that we posted a supplemental financial information package on our website which contains information about the portfolio as well as the company's financial performance. Throughout today's call, we will refer to MidCap Financial Investment Corporation as either MFIC or the BDC, and we'll use MidCap Financial to refer to the lender headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland. At this time I'd like to turn the call over to Tanner Powell, MFIC's Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Elizabeth, and thank you, everyone, for joining today's call. I will begin today's call with a summary of our results and also provide our perspective on the current environment. I will then provide an update on our proposed merger with Apollo Senior Floating Rate Fund Inc and Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc. Ted will then cover our investment activity and provide an update on the investment portfolio and credit quality. Lastly, Greg will review our financial results in greater detail. Yesterday, after market close, we reported solid results for the March quarter, which included a slight increase in net asset value per share, relatively stable credit performance, and continued de-risking of the portfolio. Net investment income per share for the March quarter was $0.44, which corresponds to an annualized return on equity or ROE of 11.4%. Results for the quarter reflect solid recurring interest income from our predominantly floating-rate portfolio and strong fee and prepayment income. GAAP EPS for the March quarter was $0.39. Similar to last quarter, we continued to improve the risk profile of our portfolio by reducing our exposure in Merx, our aircraft leasing portfolio company, as well as our second lien exposure. At the end of March, corporate lending and other represented 92% of the total portfolio, of which 97% was first lien on a fair value basis, up from 96% in the last quarter. With the repayment of one of our few remaining second lien positions, our second lien and other debt exposure is now only about 0.7% of the total corporate lending portfolio. We believe MFIC has one of the most senior corporate lending portfolios among BDCs as evidenced by our weighted average attachment point of essentially 0. We believe we have constructed a corporate lending portfolio that will perform well even during a potential economic downturn. Overall, we feel good about the health and quality of our corporate lending portfolio as our underlying borrowers have largely been able to handle higher borrowing costs. We have not seen any significant signs of credit weakness across the portfolio. We are of course closely monitoring our portfolio and mindful of the potential impacts of a higher-for-longer rate environment. I would like to provide our perspective on the current environment. Despite high interest rates, elevated inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty, the U.S. economy has proven to be resilient and continues to display strong growth. At the beginning of 2024, investors expected the Federal Reserve to cut rates multiple times during the year. However, as the quarter progressed, stubborn inflation has pushed out the expectation for the start of rate cuts, and the market generally believes that we are in a higher-for-longer scenario. Apollo's chief economist believes that there's a reasonable chance that the Fed may not cut at all in 2024. While the market is currently pricing in only one cut this year. Specific to the lending market, during the first quarter, there has been an increase in activity in the syndicated loan market. MFIC is focused on the middle market, which is less susceptible to competition from the syndicated loan market. Although spreads in our market have decreased, the decline has been less than what we've observed in the liquid loan market. Spreads in our market are still healthy by historical standards, and we continue to believe the risk-return in the middle market remains compelling. In our market today, a typical deal would price with a spread of around 500 to 550 basis points. As you know, MFIC is squarely focused on the core middle market. MidCap Financial, which was founded in 2009, has a long track record which includes closing on approximately $114 billion of lending commitments since 2013. This origination track record provides us with a very large data set of middle market company financial information across all industries and we believe makes MidCap Financial one of the most informed and experienced middle market lenders in the market. Apollo's affiliation with MidCap Financial is a significant competitive advantage for MFIC. In short, we believe the core middle market offers attractive investment opportunities across cycles and does not compete directly with either the broadly syndicated loan market or the high yield market. Next, let's turn to the dividend. Our approach to dividends seeks to provide shareholders with an attractive current yield while also retaining some earnings for NAV stability and growth. To that end, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.38 per share, consistent with our prior quarter dividend to shareholders of record as of June 11, 2024, payable on June 27, 2024. A $0.38 dividend represents an annualized yield of approximately 9.9% based on NAV per share as of March 31st. Our dividend continues to be well-covered by net investment income. Before handing the call over to Ted, I would like to provide a brief update on MFIC's proposed mergers with AFT and AIF. We remain excited about these proposed mergers and we believe that their confirmation, which is subject to receipt of certain stockholder approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions will create a stronger combined company. We look forward to realizing the potential benefits of a larger combined company including enhanced returns for all stockholders, greater scale, and enhanced portfolio diversification after closing. As a reminder, if one or both of these mergers close, MFIC will pay a one-time cash dividend of $0.20 per share to all stockholders following the closing. The exact record date for this dividend will be determined by MFIC's Board of Directors based on the timing of the closing. We filed a definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus related to the mergers on April 4th and the special meetings for the stockholders of all three funds to vote on the merger proposals have been scheduled for May 28th. We have officially commenced the proxy solicitation process related to these proposals, and we kindly request that any stockholders of MFIC, AFT, or AIF who have not yet cast their votes on these proposals do so in the coming days. Please note that we will not be able to answer any questions related to the current vote count on today's call. With that, I will turn the call over to Ted.

Thank you, Tanner. Good morning, everyone. Beginning with investment activity, as a reminder, MFIC is focused on investing in loans sourced by MidCap Financial, which provides MFIC with a large pipeline of investment opportunities. MidCap Financial is a leading middle market lender with one of the largest direct lending teams in the U.S. with close to 200 investment professionals. On last quarter's call, we mentioned we were seeing a noticeable pickup in pipeline activity. We're pleased to report that this has led to a strong level of closings during the March quarter. MidCap Financial was active during the March quarter, closing approximately $5.1 billion in new commitments, an increase of approximately 31% from the December quarter. During the March quarter, MFIC's new investment commitments totaled $149 million of new first lien commitments across 16 different borrowers for an average new commitment of $9.3 million as we continue to focus on diversification by borrower. 38% of new commitments were made to existing portfolio companies. Although we are seeing some pricing compression in the market, the weighted average spread of our new commitments in the quarter was relatively unchanged at 624 basis points, 1 basis point lower than commitments made during the December quarter. The weighted average OID for new commitments was approximately 211 basis points. The spread in OID translates into a very attractive unleveraged asset yield of around 12%, assuming a 5% base rate. The weighted average net leverage of new commitments was 3.9x. We believe the risk-return on these new commitments is very compelling. Our pipeline of investment opportunities remains strong. In terms of funded investment activity, gross fundings for the corporate lending portfolio, excluding revolvers, totaled $129 million. Sales and repayments totaled $95 million. Net corporate lending revolver pay downs were $14 million, and we received a $4 million pay down for Merx. In aggregate, net fundings for the quarter totaled $16 million. Our portfolio turnover continues to drive a positive shift in the composition of our portfolio. Sales and repayments included the exit of a $15 million second lien position, which reduced our already low second lien and other debt exposure by half to just $13.8 million or 0.7% of the total corporate lending portfolio at fair value. We believe this negligible amount of non-first lien exposure highlights the very senior nature of our corporate lending portfolio. Turning to our investment portfolio, we have built a well-diversified senior corporate lending book. At the end of March, our portfolio had a fair value of $2.35 billion and was invested in 154 companies across 23 different industries. Corporate lending and other represented approximately 92% of the total portfolio, and Merx accounted for 8% of the total portfolio on a fair value basis. The average funded corporate lending position was $14.6 million or approximately 0.7% of the total corporate and other lending portfolio. 97% of our corporate lending portfolio was first liens, up from 96% last quarter, and over 99% of our corporate lending debt portfolio on a cost basis had one or more financial covenants, and 88% of our corporate lending portfolio is backed by financial sponsors who we know well and with whom MidCap Financial has longstanding relationships. Despite the higher-for-longer interest rate environment, our portfolio companies continue to exhibit strong fundamental performance and meet our expectations. On a median basis for the quarter, portfolio company revenue and EBITDA both increased by mid-single digits year-over-year. The growth in revenue is attributable to organic expansion, while improvements in margins are due to borrowers optimizing their cost structures. We believe the sustained positive improvement is an encouraging indicator of the portfolio's underlying strength. The weighted average yield at cost of our corporate lending portfolio was 12.1% on average for the March quarter, down slightly from 12.2% in the December quarter. At the end of March, the weighted average spread on the corporate lending portfolio was 621 basis points, down 2 basis points compared to the end of December. Turning to credit quality, our focus on true first lien top of the capital structure middle market loans has resulted in what we consider to be strong and resilient credit metrics. Given the second lien repayment I mentioned, the weighted average attachment point for our corporate lending portfolio is essentially 0, or to be more precise, 0.04x. This metric means that there is no senior debt to our positions, illustrating that our corporate lending portfolio is indeed first lien. We believe it is key to look at this metric as not all debt labeled first lien is actually top of the capital structure as its name would suggest. At the end of March, the weighted average net leverage of our corporate lending portfolio was 5.36x, up from 5.27x last quarter. Moving to interest coverage, the weighted average interest coverage ratio remained at 1.9x unchanged with four companies below 1x. We're closely monitoring these situations and believe they are manageable as the companies have strong current liquidity, good underlying business performance, or have strong financial sponsor support. The median EBITDA of MFIC's corporate lending portfolio was approximately $47 million. We have not seen a meaningful increase in covenant breaches or a pickup in amendment activity. We believe our credit quality has benefited from MidCap Financial's strong sourcing and underwriting capabilities. Our underwriting on MidCap-sourced loans has proved to be sound. Based on data since mid-2016, which is the approximate date upon which we began utilizing our co-investment order, our annualized net realized and unrealized loss rate is around 2 basis points on loans sourced by MidCap Financial. We think this performance data shows how well the strategy has performed. Although we added our $12 million investment in Navigator, non-accrual status during the quarter, investments on non-accrual remain very low, totaling $14.4 million or 0.6% of the total portfolio at fair value across three names. Navigator is currently in a sales process and initial bids are reflected in our mark. We believe these stable credit metrics reflect the way in which we have constructed our portfolio and is the direct result of focus on sourcing assets from MidCap Financial, one of the leading middle market lenders. Importantly, MFIC benefits from MidCap Financial's large dedicated portfolio management team of over 60 investment professionals, which helps identify and address issues early. It is also important to note that MidCap Financial leads and serves as the administrative agent on the vast majority of our deals, which provides meaningful downside protection. As agent, we're in active dialogue with the borrower and have enhanced information flow, which allows us to be proactive in resolving problem credits. Moving on to Merx. As discussed previously, we are focused on reducing our investment in our aircraft leasing and servicing businesses. While we don't expect paydowns to occur evenly, we believe aircraft sales and servicing income should allow for the paydown of third-party debt and MFIC's investment in Merx over time. As of March 31, our investment in Merx totaled approximately $190 million, representing approximately 8% of the total portfolio at fair value. During the March quarter, Merx paid MFIC approximately $5.9 million, which included $1.9 million of interest and a $4 million return of capital. With that, I will now turn the call over to Greg to discuss our financial results in detail.

Thank you, Ted, and good morning, everyone. Beginning with our financial results, net investment income per share for the March quarter was $0.44, which reflects solid recurring interest income as well as strong fee and prepayment income. For the quarter, prepayment income was $2.2 million, and fee income was $1.7 million. PIK income remains very low, representing approximately 3% of the total investment income for the quarter. GAAP net income per share for the quarter was $0.39, which reflects a $0.05 loss net on our investment portfolio. Results for the quarter correspond to an annualized return on equity based on net investment income of 11.4% and annualized ROE based on net income of 10.1%. MFIC's NAV per share at the end of March was $15.42, up $0.01 over the prior quarter, which reflects net investment income of $0.44 which is $0.06 above the $0.38 distribution and a $0.05 loss per share on the portfolio. As Ted mentioned, the vast majority of our corporate lending portfolio continues to have strong fundamental performance. Additional details on the change in unrealized gains and losses by strategy are shown on Slide 17 in the earnings supplement deck. Net expenses for the quarter were $39.8 million, down $2.4 million compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to lower general and administrative expenses, as well as lower interest expense and lower incentive fees. We recruited a minimal amount of excise tax in March compared to approximately $1.1 million in the December quarter. The weighted average interest rate on our debt for the quarter was 7.09%, up from 6.94% last quarter, which reflects a full quarter impact of the CLO notes and the baby bonds, which both closed during the December quarter. As stated on last quarter's call, we intend to continue to evaluate and monitor capital-raising transactions going forward. Management fees totaled $4.4 million for the March quarter, essentially flat compared to the prior quarter. As a reminder, MFIC's base management fee was reduced to 1.75% on equity beginning January 1, 2023, and is one of the only listed BDCs. We change management fees on equity which we believe provides greater alignment and focus on net asset value. Incentive fees totaled $6 million for the March quarter. As a reminder, our incentive fee on income is 17.5% and includes a total return hurdle with a 12-quarter lookback. Our current estimate of undistributable taxable income or spillover income at the end of 2023 was $67.3 million or $1.03 per share. Moving to our balance sheet, MFIC's net leverage was 1.35x at the end of March compared to 1.34x at the end of December, reflecting $17 million of net fundings during the quarter. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the call to questions.

Our first question will come from Mark Hughes with Truist.

There seems to be some competitive activity in the broadly syndicated market, with more lenders exploring the middle market, which is affecting spreads. You mentioned a spread of 500 to 550 basis points today. Has that spread remained stable recently, or has it fluctuated during the quarter? What do you see as the trend?

Yes, Tanner, let me comment on that. This is Howard. It’s not so immediate, and that’s really because you may see large sponsors covered and occasionally doing larger deals that reach down into the middle market. However, to effectively cover the middle market, you need a comprehensive coverage approach and continuity with many of those sponsors. Therefore, the people focused on the larger markets often lack the capability to compete directly in the middle market. While it can happen occasionally, it's not the norm. There is, however, capital being generated in the middle market consistently, and those teams may or may not have comprehensive coverage as well. So, while there is definitely competition causing compression, it’s not primarily the result of the broadly syndicated market. The middle market is one of its strengths due to that variation.

And then, any comment on the trajectory of the spread this year, to think about where they were in January to where we are today?

Yes, I'm happy to address that. Mark, I want to highlight that we mentioned deals are between 500 and 550. In the last quarter, we executed at 624. This is related to the gestation period for deals being finalized, reflecting many processes that started last year. We are seeing a significant tightening. Currently, post-December, conditions have improved, which has led to tighter spreads and a broader market rally. These sale processes are progressing, allowing us to create new credit assets, and our pipelines are very full. My initial comment refers to the overall tightening we’ve observed in the middle market, but we are now seeing some stability as sale prices have had the chance to evolve along with opportunities for credit asset creation.

One more in, you probably have addressed this, but I wonder if you could update us kind of the seniority profile? You certainly emphasize the focus on first lien once you do the merger with the other Apollo funds. How will that look, roughly speaking?

Yes, it will look similar; those funds that are publicly available have some broadly syndicated type loans but are primarily first lien. As we have discussed in our prepared remarks and filings, as well as in our investor presentations, the goal over time is to reposition these loans into our core strategy of MidCap loans and first lien floating rate loans that we source from the MidCap platform as they mature or when we can sell them.

Our next question will come from Kyle Joseph with Jefferies.

Sorry if I missed anything. But can you provide an estimate for pro forma leverage or a rough range after the merger?

It will be somewhere around between 1.15 and 1.2x lever.

Okay. Got it. Helpful. And good segue to my next. Over the last couple of years you guys have been focused on reducing core and lowering all leverage and now, especially with the merger where we're at the point where you can think about more transitioning to kind of the offensive side, is that fair to ask?

So Kyle, we are definitely excited about the potential opportunity to deploy more capital if we are successful. I wouldn't necessarily categorize it as purely offensive or defensive since our strategy has always been focused on participating in or investing in loans that are originated at mid-cap. Our approach remains the same, and I see this as a great opportunity to increase our portfolio's proportion of those MidCap-sourced loans.

Got it. Very helpful. And then one follow-up for me, probably Greg, it's where we are on rate. I'm not going to ask you to predict where rates are going to go. But just how you're thinking about the right side of the balance sheet and the mix between floating rate and fixed rate liabilities. And that's it for me.

Okay. I mean I think that from our point of view, we do have our $350 million 10-year note coming due in March of 25, which is fixed rate. I do think we did our baby bond which was fixed rate, and we didn't swap it because we have a 2-year call option on it. I do think that as we go out, we'll match our liabilities with their assets.

Our next question will come from Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

On credit quality, it seems that payments are consistently being made. Have you noticed any increased discussions from sponsors? It was five months ago, and it appeared there would be six cuts, which pressured sponsors to take action rather than wait, especially since interest coverage is still above one. Moving forward might resolve some issues, but the potential for no cuts means that high interest costs may persist in the portfolio. Have sponsors changed their proactive strategies? Are there any requests for amendments, or any early discussions regarding what the outlook looks like given that rates are expected to remain very high for a while longer?

Yes. Yes. Happy to take that. So there's a couple of things going on. One, over the kind of, I would say, economic environment over the last few years, the sponsors and the companies are focused on really becoming more efficient so that they could prepare for a longer-term hold if necessary. And then as you alluded to, when there was a view of there are going to be five rate cuts, people got excited about doing M&A. So with the prospect of rate cuts going away, I think we can at least kind of fall back from a fundamental performance standpoint that the companies are doing well. And then secondly, if you think about the technicals of the private equity market, you still have a lot of dry powder that needs to be put to work, you still have a number of sponsors that need to return capital in order to be able to raise their next fund. So that's going to drive transactions. And there is going to be a period of time like any time that there is volatility in rate expectations or market valuations for the bid-ask to come together. And so I think that's happening. And then that will take a little bit of time to play out. And then the third thing that we're seeing is more and more continuation vehicles where sponsors have companies within their funds and they need to hold on to those longer to really realize the multiples that they're looking for. And then I guess, finally, the last thing I would say is that in terms of discussions with sponsors about other alternatives, there are some early conversations around extensions and repricings where they're coming back and saying, we thought we were going to monitor size this year, but we're going to look to next year. They're not at the point in their fund where they need to do a continuation vehicle or they don't feel the pressure to return capital. And so there are very constructive discussions around the lending groups extending the maturity and addressing the overall structure. So I would say those are kind of the four dynamics at play?

A quick follow-up to that one. Does a continuation vehicle constitute a change in control in the mandatory refinancing? I mean, is it automatic that you get ported across to the new vehicle with the existing loan?

Yes. So it is typical that that would be a change of control, but it's also typical in the direct lending space that you don't show up one day at your desk and get a notice that it's going to happen, right. There's an ongoing dialogue about what the strategy is, what the financing is going to be. And there's some visibility around the sponsor will come and say, hey, do you want to support this going forward? And sometimes we'll say yes and sometimes we say no. At which point they lost their financial process. That aligns with their continuation vehicle.

Got it. And then one more, if I can. If the mergers were to close in the near future, has the change in the competitive environment affected your plans regarding how quickly you would manage the assets within those acquired vehicles if they were acquired?

Thanks, Robert. I would say no, I think you should rely on the evaluation of risk and reward in the context of the market environment. Additionally, when it comes to investing, we're always aware of vintage and prefer to take a measured approach. This would apply even if these hypothetically closed. Therefore, if we find ourselves in a similar environment as today, we would look at the market in the same way and assess risk and reward. Our intention has always been to avoid taking on excessive exposure to any one particular vintage, and we expect to continue this approach should the mergers be successful.

We show no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back to management for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. Thank you, everyone, for listening to today's call. On behalf of the entire team, we thank you for your time today. Please feel free to reach out to us with any other questions, and have a good day.

This does conclude today's call. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day.