Greetings and welcome to the MaxLinear Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. The question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Leslie Green. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Julian, and good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's conference call to discuss MaxLinear's third quarter 2024 financial results. Today's call is being hosted by Dr. Kishore Seendripu, CEO, and Steve Litchfield, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer. After our prepared comments, we will take your questions. Our comments today include forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements relating to our guidance for the fourth quarter of 2024, including revenue, GAAP and non-GAAP gross margin, GAAP to non-GAAP operating expenses, GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other expense, and GAAP and non-GAAP diluted share count. In addition, we will make forward-looking statements relating to trends, opportunities, execution of our business plan, and potential growth and uncertainties in various product and geographic markets, including without limitation statements concerning future financial and operating results, opportunities for revenue and market share across our target markets, new products including the timing of production and launches of such products, demand for and adoption of certain technologies, and our total addressable market. These forward-looking statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties, including risks outlined in our Risk Factor section of our recent SEC filings, including our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 which we filed today. Any forward-looking statements are made as of today and MaxLinear has no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. The third quarter 2024 earnings release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at maxlinear.com. In addition, we will report certain historical financial metrics, including but not limited to gross margin, operating margin, operating expenses, and interest in other expense on both GAAP and non-GAAP basis. We encourage investors to review the detailed reconciliation of our GAAP to non-GAAP presentations and the press release available on our website. We do not provide reconciliation of non-GAAP guidance for future periods because of the inherent uncertainty associated with our ability to project certain future changes, including stock-based compensation and its related tax effects, as well as potential impairments. Non-GAAP financial measures discussed today are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable GAAP financial measures. We are providing this information because management believes it is useful to investors as it reflects how management measures our business. Lastly, this call is also being webcast, and a replay will be available on our website for two weeks.

Thank you, Leslie, and good afternoon, everyone. Our Q3 results were slightly above the midpoint of our guidance at $81.1 million in revenue, and the non-GAAP gross margin was 58.7%. We have seen meaningful improvements in our customer order rates for several quarters, along with expedited orders placed within lead times. These are early signs of recovery and combined with new product traction, we are feeling confident that we can achieve sequential improvement in our revenues in the coming quarters. Q3 was also a very active quarter for us as we demonstrated new technology and products at several industry events. In July, at the Flash Memory Summit, we showcased our partnership with AMD for Panther III, our hardware-accelerated storage compression and encryption product targeting enterprise storage and compute server applications. At ECOC, along with ONET, we demonstrated the industry's by far lowest power 8 gigabit DR8 optical transceiver solution consuming less than 12 watts for data center applications. Recently, at Network X Summit, we announced Max AI, a use case of their native machine language technology framework integrated into our Any WAN broadband access and connectivity platform solution for service providers. Additionally, in the quarter, we were delighted to receive the Best Emerging Supplier of the Year award from Cisco. Looking at our key markets, in infrastructure, the exponential growth in AI workloads continues to drive massive design activity in high-speed optical data center connectivity. We are excited that our product shipment volume run rate is now greater than 1 million units per year across several direct customers, including our Q3 ramp at a U.S. data center player. We are seeing continued progress on initial qualification testing for 800 gigabit transceivers and active electrical cables at several large data center customers. More broadly, across the industry, 800 gigabit PAM4 Ethernet adoption is starting to ramp even as 400 gigabit demand continues to accelerate. The superior power and performance of our keystone high-speed optical PAM4 products strongly position us for current opportunities, and we are highly competitive with our differentiated Rushmore family of 200 gigabit per lane PAM4 DSPs for early market adapters moving to 1.6 terabit interconnections. Moving to 5G wireless infrastructure, we are making significant customer inroads with our millimeter and microwave backhaul modem and RF transceiver products as the only full system merchant multiband radio solution in the world. With increasing mobile usage and new functionality such as AI, our hybrid microwave and millimeter wave backhaul technologies are required to support increasing transport data rates. We believe we are positioned strongly for content growth and revenue expansion as service provider CapEx spend is expected to improve in 2025 and 5G access network upgrades pick up pace globally. Also within our infrastructure revenues, our Panther III series hardware storage accelerators are providing exciting incremental growth opportunities. The need for AI at the edge, as well as growing security considerations, are resulting in a shift towards enterprise storage with all flash array and hybrid storage enterprise application systems. Panther is also gaining traction in compute subsystems for usage across servers and datacenter storage customers. Our Panther product is strongly positioned for this macro trend, and we have multiple design wins with enterprise OEM customers spread across major geographies. In Ethernet connectivity, MaxLinear has one of the broadest and most competitive portfolios of 2.5 gigabit Ethernet switch and five products for the enterprise and small and medium business switch markets, where we offer a strong value proposition for the upgrade from 1 gigabit per second legacy data rates to 2.5 gigabits per second using existing CAT5 cabling. Our Tier 1 North American enterprise OEM customer is expected to ramp to production in 2025 and contribute to significant Ethernet revenue growth over the coming years. In addition, we are seeing widespread interest from next-generation broadband gateways and routers. In total, we believe we could reach a $100 million run rate over the next 24 months. Moving to broadband and Wi-Fi connectivity, we are focused on new broadband time growth. In addition to our existing cable MSO data offering, including the latest DOCSIS 4.0 solution, we are excited by the design win traction for our PON platform, based on our single chip integrated fiber PON and 10 gigabit processor gateway, SOC, and tri-band Wi-Fi 7 single chip solution. We have seen continued momentum with design wins and promising ongoing engagements, including traction in the second Tier 1 North American carrier, which we believe can become a major opportunity for 2025 and 2026. As mentioned before at Network X, we were pleased to announce Max AI, a use case aware native machine learning technology framework integrated into our Any WAN solutions. Max AI is designed to enhance network performance, security issue triage and diagnostics, as well as improve the user connectivity experience in multi-user applications like AR, VR, video conferencing, and multiplayer gaming. We believe Max AI further strengthens our competitive position in this market. In conclusion, multiple factors give us confidence that we are well positioned to resume growth in Q4 and 2025. Following three years of innovative product development, we are gaining traction with new products in high value markets, including optical data center interconnect, enterprise Ethernet and storage accelerators, 5G wireless infrastructure, multi-gigabit PON broadband access, and Wi-Fi connectivity. These products not only open significant new target addressable markets but are poised to drive a successive cycle of revenue growth over the next several years, creating enhanced value for our customers and shareholders.

Thanks, Kishore. Total revenue for the third quarter was $81.1 million, down 12% from $92 million in the previous quarter. Broadband revenue for the third quarter was $32 million, connectivity revenue was $13 million. Infrastructure revenue was $23 million, and industrial multi-market revenue was $13 million. GAAP and non-GAAP gross margin for the third quarter were approximately 54.4% and 58.7% of revenue. The delta between GAAP and non-GAAP gross margin in the third quarter was primarily driven by $3.5 million of acquisition-related intangible asset amortization. Third-quarter GAAP operating expenses were $110.8 million, and non-GAAP operating expenses were $72.8 million. The delta between the GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses was primarily due to restructuring costs of $26.8 million related to the workforce reduction initiated in Q2 and stock-based compensation and performance-based equity accruals of $11.5 million combined. GAAP and non-GAAP loss from operations for Q3 2024 was 82% and 31% of net revenue. GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other expense during the quarter was $15.8 million and $4 million respectively, which did include some currency fluctuation in the quarter. The delta between the GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other expense was primarily impairment of an investment in a privately held company of $11.8 million. In Q3 cash flow used in operating activities was approximately $31 million. We exited Q3 of 2024 with approximately $149 million in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash. Our days sales outstanding was down significantly in the third quarter to approximately 54 days. Our gross inventory was also down versus the previous quarter as we continue to improve inventory turns slightly to less than 1. This concludes the discussion of our Q3 financial results. With that, let's turn to our guidance for Q4 of 2024. We currently expect the Q4 of 2024 to be between $80 million and $100 million in revenue. Looking at Q4 by end market, we expect broadband to be slightly down, while infrastructure, connectivity, and industrial multi-market are expected to be up. We expect fourth quarter GAAP gross margin to be approximately 54% to 57%, and non-GAAP gross margin to be in the range of 57.5% to 60.5% of revenue. We expect Q4 2024 GAAP operating expenses to be in the range of $88 million to $94 million. We expect Q4 2024 non-GAAP operating expenses to be in the range of $58 million to $64 million. We expect our Q4 GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other expense each to be in the range of approximately $1 million to $2.5 million. We expect our Q4 GAAP and non-GAAP diluted share count to be approximately 84.5 million each. In closing, following a prolonged market correction, we are now seeing a positive turning point in our business. We are excited that our innovation and investment in strategic applications such as optical high-speed interconnects, wireless infrastructure, storage, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, and fiber broadband access gateways are creating transformative opportunities for long-term growth. In addition, our strong focus on operating efficiency and fiscal discipline are opening up near-term leverage in our business model, as we enter our next stage of growth and expansion. With that, I would like to open up the call for questions.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. And our first question comes from Tore Svanberg, Stifel.

Kishore, I was hoping you could elaborate a little bit more on your $1 million optical transceiver comment. Could you give us a sense for the mix between 400 gig and 800 gig? And I assume that's what you've shipped so far. What I'm trying to get to here, of course, is this sort of a run rate versus is this sort of a run rate now that we should think about into calendar ‘25? Meaning that you could potentially do more than a million for the whole year next year.

Yes, our prepared remarks pointed to a 1 million unit per year run rate as we exit the year. But coincidentally, if you accumulate all the units that we have, we are now forecasting to ship through the end of 2024. We'll be pretty much at 1 million units or slightly more. So, yes, we are excited about the progress we have made and this million units run rate is actually being primarily driven by optical transceiver revenues related to both 800 gigabit and 400 gigabit, but 800 gigabit being the larger fraction relative to 400 gigabit transceivers. We do expect many more designs to come through finish. We have a huge number of design wins that are in place with OEMs, but they are all gated by sort of delays or prolonged data center calls that are happening. So we are very optimistic that we'll exceed this run rate through 2025.

As a follow-up, I was hoping you could give us an update on the broadband business. It's great to see the other three segments growing sequentially in Q4. Obviously, broadband is still going to be down. Just help us understand where we sit on inventory levels. I know there's been some delays with DOCSIS 4.0, is that starting to clear out? So, any visibility and especially sort of a comment on how you expect that broadband business to do in 2025.

So, Tore, obviously, from where we are, we expect the broadband business to grow in 2025. However, as we're straddling the bottom here, the order rates have picked up as it's a full platform solution. They tend to come in a chunky manner, and as the market is gearing up, I think of the character in the Flintstones, revolving legs, so I think we will start picking up orders, but I wouldn't read much into the Q4 dip. It's just the cadence of the POs, and you're seeing still a lagging effect of customer deliveries. I do want to point out that the pickup in the bookings is primarily related to broadband. It's a very good sign. Outside of our infrastructure in optical, these have been the two drivers of our engine for orders right now. So I'm very happy about that. Getting back to the cable side of the business, the cable business right now is still a DOCSIS 3.2, 3.1 business; 4.0 is really just in pilot quantities. And even so, I believe and I know that when the Cable Recovery Act happens, it'll still be dominated by 3.1 and Ultra DOCSIS 3.1, and 4.0 will remain a small fraction of the revenues in ‘25 and probably grow steadily from there in ‘26.

Sounds good. I'll go back in line, and I love the Flintstone analogy.

Our next question comes from Ross Seymore, Deutsche Bank.

Also, congratulations, love the Flintstone thing too. Just a near-term question and then a little bit of a longer-term question. Steve, when you talked about the guidance for the fourth quarter, a little bit down in broadband, everything else up, it seems like everything else has to go up by about 20% sequentially. Can you just give us an idea of where that's coming from? Is it just shipping closer to demand? Is it the secular growth in the infrastructure side and kind of the optical transceivers? Just any color on that is my first question please?

Yes, I mean look, I think we're seeing improved demand in general, really across the board. The bookings have improved across the board. Kishore mentioned the strength in broadband in particular. Yes, that's definitely picked up, but that's also been the one that lagged the most, I think. We're doing well on the optical front. As you're aware, Ross, this year was going to be pretty back-end loaded as 800 gig kind of adoption started. And so that will be a big contributor. As far as the other end markets, we do see some modest recovery happening in connectivity. Industrial multi-market was down quite a bit in Q3; there China continues to be depressed, and industrial continues to be depressed. But we'll start to see that improve in Q4, and then I think we'll see some modest improvements throughout 2025.

And then, I guess, you guys talked about the OpEx cutting last quarter. How should we think about the linearity of that? I think you said year-over-year down 20% to 25%, if I recall right, for next year. Are we still on path for that? And kind of how do you get from the $61 million you talked about before to it looks like you'd be slightly less than that at some point next year?

Yes, I'm glad you noticed that; that's been a lot of work throughout Q3 - getting this cost structure down. Yes, we are on track to realize the 20% to 25% reduction next year. Some of the majority of those costs have been realized, but there will still be some residual kind of over the next quarter or two. But we do feel like we're on track to hit that number.

Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton, Needham & Company.

I wanted to start with bookings. You guys have talked about bookings improving now, I think, for several quarters. Are we now at a point where book-to-bill is back above 1? I mean, it looks like it likely is given that you guided higher for the December quarter, but just wanted to see if you could comment whether book-to-bill was back above 1?

Yes. So, I think you know, we don't break out the bookings number. We feel very good. I mean, we saw a really significant uptick in bookings in this past quarter. So that was very encouraging and we're seeing follow-through now even. Backlogs are building nicely for Q4 and Q1 already, and so we're running at higher levels than we were in previous quarters. So, another encouraging sign, and then I think the last one that I would mention is probably sell-through; sell-through has been very good. So it feels like that demand continues, so all of those are encouraging signs.

We are kind of feeling optimistic that the gap between the sell-in and the sell-through, so to speak, closes within the next couple of quarters, and both will be at equal dynamic, so to speak, on a rate basis.

Any comment on how much higher sell-out is right now than sell-in? That's not my second question, to ask it.

We are still in the Flintstone here to clear.

The second question, the optical business obviously sounds like it's on a very, very good pace. You talked about exceeding $30 million and if you guys are going to do close to 1 million optical DSPs this year. My guess is ASP in the DSP space is definitely over 30 bucks. I wouldn't be surprised, and I won't ask you to comment, but if optical DSP might be closer to 40 or 50, and if that's the case, total infrastructure revenue looks like it's going to be on pace to be about $115 million to maybe $120 million. So if I back out optical, everything else is probably only $70 million or $80 million where it was probably $177 million last year. I understand optical is good, but you've talked about Panther, you've talked about the microwave backhaul and everything you say sounds very encouraging, but the revenue is still very, very depressed. So, I understand optical is good, but you've talked about Panther, you've talked about the microwave backhaul and everything you say sounds very encouraging, but the revenue is still very, very depressed. And so can you give us outside of optical, when do you think the rest of the business really starts to get back? Because it feels like it's pretty depressed. I assume a lot of that is inventory depletion rather than end market demand destruction. But wondering if you could comment on the infrastructure ex-optical.

Yes, no problem, Quinn. Yes, absolutely, I mean, we had mentioned this, we talked through it last quarter as well. As expected, wireless infrastructure is definitely a drag. Telecom spending is down, was it 12 plus months ago now? Wireless infrastructure was really humming and that's really dialed back consistent with all the telecom CapEx spending information that's out there. So I think those revenues really follow that. There is some analog product, as you're aware, that sells into the infrastructure market that's soft. Some of that's enterprise-related. As far as the real growth drivers, I mean, we talked short, kind of talked through the optical side, but Panther also is another encouraging one as far as we are seeing good traction. We do really have positive developments on the customer front with that. We think we're really well positioned. So the outlook is very good as we get through inventory with some of the telecom spend, we'll start to see that recover. I mean, next year I think we'll see 30% plus increases in our infrastructure business. So I think that's really exciting.

Our next question comes from Christopher Rolland, Susquehanna International Group.

Congrats on what looks like the bottom here. As we have more confidence in this bottom, do you guys have a better view on kind of what more normalized revenue would look like, either quarterly or annually for broadband, I guess number one, and then connectivity number two, just in a completely normalized environment, where you think those revenues go to now?

Yes, I think we are getting through the inventory challenges that we've been through over the last two years, frankly. So that's encouraging. You kind of saw that last quarter. You'll see some follow-through over the next couple of quarters, which is good. I think of it a little bit more. Chris, I don't know that we're completely out of the woods yet, but I do feel like we are kind of getting back to that other level. I mean, I do expect to see kind of broadband connectivity growing double digits next year. So, I think we are on the right track there. Is there more to be made up? Yes. But I think all the signs are there, the bookings are there, the new wins. The PON business that we're winning is really encouraging. And for that matter, even the cable improvements that we're seeing are also good. You continue to see upgrades. I think as we look into next year, you're going to start to see some of the bead money rollout. There are a handful of drivers that will see a recovery in the market beyond just the inventory situation. There's new products, there's new wins, there's share gains, there's PON transition, and there's Wi-Fi-7 transition as well, which is something else. There’s been a bit of a lull in the market as that adoption takes place.

And then my second question is on optical. Kishore, you talked about the huge number of design wins. I was wondering if you could kind of bucket these into customers for us, particularly those that you expect to ship in big volumes. So like what percent do you think are going to be like general transceiver providers versus, let's say, hyperscalers versus systems vendors? And can you speak to qualifications particularly at the systems guys and then at hyperscalers?

I would like to highlight that we are currently engaged in numerous designs with leading module makers worldwide. I can confidently assert this. These companies are focusing on all the major data centers. In the past year and a half, all tier-one shipments of optical transceivers have primarily been driven by NVIDIA's InfiniBand products. I just want to point out that as far as the data center guys go on the Ethernet side of the thing, actually the adoption has been very slow and that is just beginning to move, and in fact, if anything, 400 gigabit is accelerating. Some of these module vendors are fully qualified in system vendors if it is systems-level solutions, and some of these module vendors are directly in interop process with many data centers. I just want to point out that China is going to hit a massive AI boom in the next deployment boom starting in '25. There are many, many data centers if you combine both the U.S. and China. The data is raised from the big players like to what we call Tier-2, but they're gigantic as well. I think it's in Tier-2 data centers that we are through the calls. At Tier-1s, we're in the process of the calls, but there is a build-out going on in preparation for that. There's a lot of optimism in the industry about MaxLinear products. Maybe part of a rite of passage that they want to put through. It's like hazing in a fraternity. You can see, many analogies are quite interesting right now, but I feel good. I feel really good that we can deliver. We are delivering and feel pretty excited about it. I will leave it there and let the results speak for themselves as we move forward because that's what it's being for us, and so we want to be measured as well.

Our next question comes from David Williams, Benchmark Company.

Let me also give you my congrats on the turn here. I guess maybe the first question is just around, and you talked a little bit about this earlier Kishore, but the Swan Creek and just that transition of 2.5 G sounds like you've got some really nice traction there. Can you talk maybe about what your expectation is over maybe ‘25 and what that contribution could look like, and how is that, is, I guess, is the adoption coming in at expectations or do you think it's slower, maybe even faster than you would have anticipated?

David, this one case, I would say the adoption has been excellent. It's moving faster than we can support. And so, having said that, adoption has two parts: one is the rate at which they can sell at the end market. So, there are two parts. One is enterprise-type businesses; the other one is kind of consumer-ish type of businesses. We were very surprised by the amount of traction in the consumer retail type markets, whereas the small business, medium business, and major enterprise business are going at a pace as expected with no hiccup. We are very, very pleased with it. In fact, if anything, it's emboldened our view about our future roadmap on Ethernet switch product lines and the various configurations of 2.5 gigabit and the number of ports associated with this. I did talk about Max AI from MaxLinear, and Max AI is not just a framework, a machine learning AI framework for various use case scenarios in performance optimizations just for the broadband platforms. It's a general concept and capability that we are building on that will proliferate all our product lines, including our five switch products, our Panther accelerated products, and so on. So we are really trying to drive the company now to be very, very AI being a necessary tool in terms of showing your competitive superiority in the product. So looking forward to the next year with 2025, and I can't give you but 2025, but I can only tell you about how big the Switch Swan Creek product can be. I look at the Switch Swan Creek product to be anywhere between a $50 million to $100 million potential on an annualized run rate basis over a three-year window.

Maybe talking about the Max AI, can you maybe, how do you think about that in terms of value and driving? Is that something you can monetize or is it more of a value add? How do you think maybe just, what's that go to market look like with the Max AI?

There are two parts to it. One is there are parts of it that we imagine will be offered as default because it's stable stakes and competitive differentiation. The other parts of it will be very customized to develop various customers. And these days, right, as a company, we ship to very large customers, customer consolidation has dramatically impacted the market. So there will be some customization. So I think there’s what you call a pay-to-play model, and if we don't play, we won't win, so to speak, right? So those are the two buckets. So I think it will be a hybrid model. But the latter model of pay-to-play will take some time because the industry is in a very infant phase in terms of utilizing AI for delivering real performance for improving efficiency on the networking and communication side and use case scenarios. I think that will play out as time develops.

Our next question comes from Suji Desilva, ROTH Capital.

Kishore, I hadn't heard other optical guys mentioning the China hyperscaler opportunity, maybe it's just they say there's a larger bucket. But are you guys differentiated in your position in China relative to others who may be more focused on the U.S. opportunity or is it similar across the landscape?

I would say the differentiation is universal. It's neither Chinese nor American. Low power, low power, low power, and if you really go back to our history, we were made to deliver low power to all the products and communications that we have ever offered. I think that's what is beginning to come through. We will continue to do so that with not just a Keystone product; there will be a notion of the lowest power there. But if you look forward to our Rushmore product and the offering of BOM around Rushmore, it will be by far the lowest power anybody will bring out in the next 12 months for sure.

And then maybe perhaps for Steve, on the Wi-Fi, the connectivity revenue versus the broadband revenue, Steve, should I think of those as more coupled than not, or are there specific drivers for each one as you go through the next few quarters?

I think there is definitely some overlap, right? So, Wi-Fi and Ethernet, there is a lot of attach that has happened historically as you're well aware. But we keep them separate because we continue to see more traction winning Wi-Fi outside of standard gateway business as well as winning more Ethernet business. And that was really, you've heard us talk a lot about some of the traction we're getting with our Ethernet product in the industrial markets in the enterprise markets. That's one of the places that we've really leveraged that 2.5 gig solution and penetrating with our sales force kind of getting more opportunities out there. Going forward, you're going to continue to see more growth out of that connectivity enabled by these new markets.

Our next question comes from Ananda Baruah, Loop Capital Markets LLC.

Yes, a couple if I could. Really the first few are probably clarification. Kishore, in the prepared remarks actually, I think you may be beginning of Q&A, you talked about a run rate, this is DSP run-rate exiting optical DSP run rate exiting this year, '24? And did I hear you accurately that you were saying right now the run rate is 1 million, but exiting '24, you may have shipped 1 million which would put you at $4 million rather heading into '25? Just looking for a clarification there, and then I have a couple of other ones.

So, Ananda, just for clarity, the exiting run rate is 1 million units per year, so it's not a quarterly run rate. The question that I believe Tore asked is that, and which I responded to, we obviously expect to do much better than that, and it'll be in excess of the 1 million unit per year run rate. Now $4 million would be fantastic, but let's stick to being greater than 1 million unit per year for now.

And then another clarification around Suji’s question, are you also working with, and actually just sort of clarification on your remarks. When you say you are working with all the leading trans, module makers, does that include the Chinese module makers?

Everyone.

Next question comes from Karl Ackerman, BNP Paribas.

I have one clarification question and a follow-up. Just on the clarification question, Steve, I think you were mentioning China restrictions being a headwind to your September quarter and December quarter guide. Were those restrictions more or less than your prior view or I'm just hoping you could clarify the commentary for December?

Yes, we said that it would probably be $5 million to $10 million in the back half of the year would be the impact. We're definitely feeling that you can kind of see that in our industrial multi-market numbers. I think the good thing here is that thing's behind us. We don't see problems going ahead and so excited about looking forward into next year.

And then, I think what's in broadband, you indicated PON remains a strong longer-term opportunity, particularly with your tri-band ship solution at a second Tier 1 U.S. carrier. I know you're talking about how broadband is still down for December, but I guess as you look into 2025, are you seeing orders for PON being pulled in earlier than you previously envisioned at the second carrier and/or is a recovery upon more of a back half ‘25 and into 2026 view?

Steve, I'll just take it for a second. The general trend, there's a lot of activity on the telco players to start rolling out fiber. They have dusted up their plans, and whether they're doing fixed fire access or not, they realize that they really need a PON fiber network. Anything they're considering right now is how do we lay out what you call start laying more fiber. You see that in the AT&T commitment, and that's like their big thing. You see that Verizon; you are seeing that in their communication related to acquisition discussions that have been in the newspapers. There's a general trend for everybody to start revisiting their fiber rollout plans very seriously. As the real backbone to the bounty, they have been getting on the fixed wireless access. We are seeing momentum. They're discussing RFPs, RFQs and stuff. While some are ahead, some are later, in terms of revenue momentum on solutions for gateways and so on, I really think the latter half of 2025 is slowly coming into a run-rate basis, and the follow-on continuing through 2026 and 2027. There’s going to be any jump starts; like suddenly, they turn on the switch because you've got to keep in mind that our revenue in fiber to start with is a very small share. Last year was about $50 million to $100 million range. The telecom spend has been down, but that has not shown up in the fiber numbers because it's been a growth venue for us. The momentum should start moving forward.

Our next question comes from Richard Shannon, Craig-Hallum.

Maybe to hit on a product segment that hasn't been asked about here in wireless infrastructure. I think you gave Kishore some pretty positive comments about the go forward from here. Maybe you can just give us a sense of visibility here in terms of bookings and when we might start to see some sort of pickup and get back to prior highs?

It's a very, very good question, Richard. And look, everybody is like wireless infrastructure. It's all looking boring and stuff. But I just look at it as a last man's tiny game, the right technology. In a couple of weeks, it will turn around, and then there's going to be beautiful revenue, that's really, really long-term revenue. We have the right investment in technology right now. We're going to start seeing some recovery in telecom spend, and the first focus will be Southeast Asia, Latin America, and India, all the expansion in terms of starting to upgrade their networks to 5G. There, wireless transport is the single biggest mechanism, and they're really, really hungry for expanded bandwidth data rate for transport because fiber is not an option, right? We are very, very well positioned there. And then you come back to the fact of how is the recovery looking like, oh my gosh, I mean, last quarter, I think Quinn pointed out like he said like, also optical things will be very down. Yes, they are very down. In fact, they are horribly down on the wireless side last quarter. And now we have all indications that there's going to be a steady improvement in bookings, and we have bookings that actually reflect those. Wireless is going to recover steadily throughout the entire year next year and beyond '25 is going to really pick up even more strongly. Things are beginning to look positively up on wireless infrastructure and seem to be pretty steadily recovering potential.

Appreciate that summary there. Maybe touching on another topic that hasn't been hit on much today here in storage. I think you made one brief comment about some progress there at Flash Memory Summit. I think you've been quoted publicly in an investor conference talking about a revenue bogey of that category of $50 million to $75 million I think that was applied to the account year '26. Wondering if you're progressing well towards that generic goal or above or below that, just kind of general thoughts there?

So I still hold the bogey over the next three-year window. But things are a little bit slow in terms of that timeline right now because, as I told you, much of the design traction was enterprise storage applications. Those guys have delayed their rollout plans due to a lot of inventory on their side as well. And so the '26 bogey number may shift out a bit, but there is no reason to change our view on how big the Panther storage business can be. That's absolutely right what you've said. What we are trying to do right now is proliferate Panther beyond just a storage application. Steve talked a bit; there are like compute servers, subsystems, and expand the scope beyond that. It's getting a lot of traction right now in what we call customer evaluations and proofs-of-concepts within the customer itself. To help that process, we also rolled out software-defined storage that mimics Panther so that customers can prepare their solutions well ahead of using the hardware to be ready.

I just had a follow-up. Kishore, I know you've been sampling the Rushmore 200 gig per lane since, OFC this year. I was just wondering as far as timing of revenue there and where would that revenue come initially between regular optical modules versus LRO or AEC?

That's a very good question, Tore. I believe we can all recognize that the key challenge is delivering the same DSPs with significantly lower power consumption. We are being seen as leaders in LROs, but the main focus is to provide those DSPs while using a fraction of the power; that has become a guiding principle. This highlights the complexity and difficulty of PAM4 system modulation as we increase the bandwidth. The challenge is even greater on the corporate side with active electrical cables. This is indeed a major technological endeavor, and as we move forward, we feel very optimistic. Regarding the 200 gig, really the only one looking at 200 gig is really the AI type systems. It's really driven by NVIDIA right now. All the other data center folks are sort of the Ethernet types; they got some lot more time for this to happen. Having said that, you are not real in this market unless you have everything the world wants. So, we're gearing up to that and we hope to showcase our Rushmore product in a full-blown way with multiple vendors in the OFC. That's just going to come about in a couple of months, but okay, it's three months away. But that's the goal here. Really, there's no real customer for 200 gig in any way other than NVIDIA trying to get ahead. We have told this before, NVIDIA is developing its own DSP solutions; that will be their first reference, number one, and then hopefully they expand the scope to other multiple vendors to secure their supplies in the future. Thank you, everyone. With that being the last question, I want to thank you all. This quarter will present a number of financial conferences in person and virtual events, and we'll pose the details of the calendar on the investor relations page. We look forward to speaking with you again soon. Thank you very much.

Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time.